GLP-1RA Use Research Articles

Abstract 4115541: Association of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Use with Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown efficacy for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but conflicting evidence exists regarding their impact on cardiac arrhythmias. Whereas some studies suggested a possible association between GLP-1RA use and arrhythmogenesis, other studies suggested decreased association with atrial fibrillation (AF). Overall, large-scale real-world data evaluating risk of AF in association with GLP-1RAs are lacking. Objective: To compare risk of incident AF after initiation of GLP1-RA vs Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i), as active comparators, in patients with DM. Methods: This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted within the Veterans Health Administration from fiscal years 2006 to 2021. The study included U.S. veterans aged 35 years or older who initiated either GLP1-RA or DPP4i prescriptions. The primary outcome assessed was a composite outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF), defined as a diagnosis of AF/flutter based on administrative codes or undergoing an AF procedure. Results: Out of 116,235 GLP1-RA users and 217,668 DPP4i users, we propensity score-matched 80,948 pairs, on 88 characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, cardiovascular risk score, healthcare utilization, DM control, laboratory investigation, and medications. Composite outcome of AF was similar in GLP-1RA group (4.1%) and DPP4i group (4.3%); odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.01. Secondary analyses stratified by medication use duration showed no significant differences in composite AF risk (P>0.05). Notably, individuals achieving weight loss of 2%, 5%, or 10% of baseline body weight had significantly lower AF incidence, whereas no significant differences were observed in those with no weight loss or weight gain (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.07). Conclusions: Use of GLP1-RA in patients with DM was not associated with a decreased risk of AF when compared with the use of DPP4i. In the subgroup analysis, significantly lower AF risk was seen in the GLP-1 RA group who achieved weight loss vs. DPP4i and this highlights weight loss as a potential modifier of cardiovascular outcomes in DM.

Abstract 4118762: Large-scale multinational trends in the use of cardioprotective antihyperglycemic agents as first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a LEGEND-T2DM study

Background: US guidelines for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) recommend metformin as first-line anti-hyperglycemic therapy (AHT), but prioritizing the use of AHTs that reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk – GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is – is increasingly suggested for people with CVD. We examine the multinational use patterns of GLP1-RAs, SGLT2is, DPP4is, and sulfonylureas (SUs) as first-line therapies for patients with CVD. Methods: In 10 US and 6 non-US databases between 2016 and 2021 mapped to a common data model [A], we measured yearly initiation of GLP1-RAs, SGLT2is, DPP4is, and SUs as first-line AHTs in patients with T2DM with and without CVD [B]. We also compared the initiation of the drug classes as second-line after metformin. We calculated the annual rate of change in proportional initiation of each drug class as first-line AHT and assessed differences in trends as group x time interactions in linear mixed models. Results: Across all data sources, 3.3 million patients with T2DM used GLP1-RAs, SGLT2is, DPP4is, or SUs as first-line AHTs, and 3.9m initiated these drug classes as second-line AHT after metformin. Within the first-line cohort, 1.4m (41%) had established CVD compared with 1.2m (31%) in the second-line cohort. For GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is, the annual rate of their relative use as first-line agents increased among patients with T2DM with CVD (GLP1RAs: ranging 1.3-5.4% in US [C] and 0.3-0.8% in non-US [D], SGLT2is: 2.1-12.9% in US [E] and 8.1-10.6% in non-US databases [F]). There was a larger relative increase in the use of SGLT2i and a smaller increase in GLP1RA use in CVD vs non-CVD cohorts (P interaction <.001). While there was a larger increase in GLP1RAs uptake in the US cohorts, SGLT2i use increased more in non-US cohorts ([C-F], P interaction <.001 for all, except .01 for SGLT2i). Of note, across cohorts, the uptake of GLP1RA and SGLT2i as first-line was higher than second-line use among those with CVD (P interaction <.001). In contrast, DPP4i and SU use as first-line was lower than GLP1RA and SGLT2is and decreased over time (P<.001). Conclusions: In a large-scale multinational, federated cohort of patients with T2DM, the use of cardioprotective agents increased as first-line AHT, with variation in SGLT2i and GLP1RAs uptake across study cohorts.

Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on prostate cancer risk reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies among men globally. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), primarily used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management, have been investigated for their potential effects on cancer risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between GLP-1 RA use and risk reduction of prostate cancer. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to July 30, 2024. Studies that met the inclusion criteria randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and observational studies assessing the incidence of prostate cancer in GLP-1 RA-treated patients were included. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. A total of five studies were included, analyzing data from diverse international contexts. The included studies showed a reduced risk of prostate cancer with both adjusted and unadjusted effect estimates with GLP-1 RAs. The meta-analysis revealed an RR of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.610 to 0.832), indicating a statistically significant 28% reduction in prostate cancer risk associated with GLP-1 RA use compared to placebo or other antidiabetic drugs. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 51%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the results. The findings suggest a significant protective association between GLP-1 RA use and reduced prostate cancer risk in men, particularly those with T2DM. This supports the potential of GLP-1 RAs not only in diabetes management but also as a strategy to mitigate cancer risk. Further research is required to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms, considering different dosages, durations of therapy, and patient subgroups based on demographic and metabolic characteristics.

Persistence and Adherence to GLP-1 RA treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Nationwide registry study

Abstract Background The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonsists (GLP-1 RA) continues to rise and is increasingly important in the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Though the use of GLP-1 RA continues to increase, persistence and adherence to therapy remains suboptimal. Purpose We aimed to assess the level of adherence and persistence to GLP-1 RA using real-world data and to investigate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with discontinuation of GLP-1 RA therapy. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, all first-time users of GLP-1 RA with T2DM ≥18 years from 2007-2020 were identified using the Danish registries (Figure 1A-1B). All participants had 18 months of follow-up. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated by summing days of medication supply from all dispensed prescription made during the study period divided by number of days in study period. MPR ≥0.80 was used to define adherence. Discontinuation was defined as >90 days between the last day of prescription coverage and the first day of a new dispensed prescription. Adherence to GLP-1 RA therapy and the risk of discontinuing therapy was estimated at 6- and 12-months of follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with discontinuing GLP-1 RA therapy. Results In total, 44,343 first-time users of GLP-1 RA with T2DM were identified (mean age: 58.6 years, 42.7% female, 21.3% had cardiovascular disease, median duration of T2DM was 6.8 years, median HbA1c was 65 mmol/mol). The absolute risk of discontinuing GLP-1 RA at 6 and 12 months was 14.2% (95%CI: 13.9-14.6) and 21.4% (95%CI: 21.1-21.8), respectively (Figure 2A). Of the 9,520 (21.5%) who discontinued therapy during the 12-month follow-up, 1,947 (20.5%) occurred within the first 31 days of treatment. At 6 months, 58.5% were adherent to GLP-1 RA therapy with a median MPR of 0.84 [IQR: 0.70-0.95]. At 12 months, 61.1% were adherent to therapy with a median MPR of 0.85 [IQR: 0.71, 0.94]. In the multivariable model, low (<40 years) and high age (>75 years), lower household income, educational level, longer diabetes duration, and higher comorbidity burden were associated with a higher risk of discontinuing GLP-1 RA whereas baseline HbA1c was not (Figure 2B-2E). Conclusion Approximately one in five patients discontinued therapy within 12 months and a little over 60% were adherent. Sociodemographic factors, including household income, age, and comorbidity burden were associated with risk of discontinuing GLP-1 RA therapy. Given the changing landscape of who should be treated with GLP-1 RA, the cardio-renal benefits reported in recent trials, and the ongoing trials in the field, future research into adherence and persistence to GLP-1 RA and possible interventions to improve these, are needed.

Anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1RA) receptor agonists possess multiple favourable metabolic, anti-inflammatory effects and their use is associated with marked body weight reduction. More importantly, this drug class has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at high cardiovascular risk or with established cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, current guidelines recommend the use of GLP-1RA sas first-line antidiabetic therapies in patients at high cardiovascular risk. Semaglutide is a potent GLP-1RA used in the treatment of T2DM with proven cardiovascular benefits. It is currently available in formulations for oral and subcutaneous administration. The anti-inflammatory effect could be one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Determining the anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide was the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomised clinical trials that have quantified the effect of semaglutide on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to placebo or a control group (other glucose-lowering drugs). The primary outcome was CRP index (final CRP/basal CRP). A random-effects model was used. Results Overall, this meta-analysis shows that semaglutide therapy was associated with lower CRP index values compared to placebo (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.43, I2 92%) or when comparing semaglutide treatment versus a control group consisting of patients medicated with other glucose-lowering drugs (SMD -0.45; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.23, I 3 82%). The stratified analysis was performed by analysing only the trials that used a placebo group as comparator, When the trials were analysed according to the different dosing schemes (subcutaneous vs. oral), the results were not statistically significantly different (oral semaglutide group: SMD -0.33; 95% CI -0.75 to 0.08, I2 95%); semaglutide subcutaneous dose group: SMD -0.69; 95% CI -0.78 to -0.60, I2 74%); interaction p = 0.098. Furthermore, when the trials were analysed according to the included populations (patients with or without T2DM), the results were similar (patients with T2DM: SMD -0.32; 95% CI -0.51 to -0.14, I2 86%); patients without T2DM: SMD -0.82; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.74, I2 58%); interaction p = < 0.0001. Conclusion The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of semaglutide was associated with a reduction in inflammation irrespective of the population evaluated or the treatment regimen used. These findings would explain one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events.

A real-world data analysis investigating the cardioprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among people with type 2 diabetes in England

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common and major complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Anti-diabetic therapy aims to lower blood glucose, with primary clinical trial endpoints for new antidiabetic entrants focused on HbA1c. Research suggests some glucose-lowering drugs, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), can have a cardioprotective effect in people with T2D.1,2 Purpose To compare the real-world risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) in people with T2D treated with GLP-1 RAs compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or basal insulin. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, secondary care Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics death registrations. We included patients aged ≥18 years with T2D at high-risk or very-high-risk of CVD (as defined by the European Society of Cardiology) who had ≥2 prescriptions of either GLP-1 RA (dulaglutide, liraglutide, and semaglutide), DPP-4 inhibitor (as part of line 4 therapy) or basal insulin from 01/01/2014-31/12/2018. We excluded those pregnant at therapy initiation or with type 1 diabetes. Follow-up started at second prescription of relevant therapy and ended at the earliest of two years later, pregnancy, death, end of primary care record, or 31/12/2019. We used data from patients’ medical histories to define baseline characteristics. We calculated the incidence of MACE per 100,000 person-years (PY), defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death. We used Cox proportional hazards regression, using LASSO to select confounding clinical variables including BMI, prior MACE and intercurrent antidiabetic treatments, to estimate risk difference of MACE among those treated with 1) GLP1-RA and DPP-4 inhibitor and 2) GLP1-RA and basal insulin. Results We included 63,237 patients, among whom the patients treated with GLP1-RA were younger and a higher proportion were obese or severely obese than those treated with DPP-4 inhibitor or basal insulin (Table 1). The incidence of MACE was highest in those treated with DPP-4 inhibitor (high-risk 1,503.0/100,000 PY; very-high-risk 6,000.7/100,000 PY) followed by basal insulin (high-risk 1,396.9/100,000 PY; very-high-risk 5,707.1/100,000 PY), and lowest in those treated with GLP1-RA (high-risk 377.1/100,000 PY; very-high-risk 1,946.1/100,000 PY). After adjustment, the risk of MACE among patients treated with GLP1-RA was still significantly lower than those treated with either DPP-4 inhibitor (high-risk aHR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.86 and very-high-risk aHR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.73) or those treated with basal insulin (high-risk aHR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.72 and very-high-risk aHR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.81). Conclusion(s) Our study supports clinical trial and other observational research studies which find a cardioprotective effect of GLP-1 RA use in people with T2D.

GLP1-RA versus DPP4 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes: A three-year real-world analysis

Abstract Background Cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP1-RAs have massively impacted the clinical practice in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. The cardiovascular protective properties of GLP1-RA compared to DPP4 have been demonstrated in an observational setting before, however recent methodological developments have enabled clinically relevant effect estimation. Aim This study aimed to evaluate the real-world cardiovascular outcomes of GLP1-RA versus DPP4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. Methods In this study, we utilized the Danish nationwide registers to identify new users of GLP1-RA or DPP4 therapies from 2012 to 2022. Participants were required to be either at least 50 years of age and have one or more of the following conditions: hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, or chronic renal disease or be at least 60 years of age and have hypertension. Additionally, their glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels needed to be 53 mmol/mol or higher within the year preceding their first prescription date for these therapies. The index date was defined as the initial prescription date, and comorbidities and medicine use were evaluated up to 10 years prior to this date. Individuals who had filled prescriptions for SGLT2 inhibitors within six months prior to their index date were excluded from the study. The outcome of interest was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (MACE). Patients were followed for up to three years until MACE, all-cause mortality, emigration, or until the end of follow-up on December 31, 2022. To assess the three-year risk of MACE, the Aalen Johansson estimator was used. A casual inference framework was employed estimating the three-year average treatment effect using g-formula based on Cox regression with competing risk. Results A total of 26,190 individuals were included, with 19,494 initiating DPP4 inhibitor therapy and 6,696 initiating GLP1-RA therapy. The three-year risk of MACE was 8.56% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.11 to 9.00) for the DPP4 initiator group, compared to 4.76% (95% CI: 4.08 to 5.43) for the GLP1-RA initiator group. Emulating what would have happened had all included individuals initiated GLP1-RA treatment versus had all initiated treatment with DPP4, accounting for age, sex, income, education, degree of urbanization, diabetes duration, baseline hba1c level, co-medicine, and co-morbidities, we estimated an three-year average treatment effect of -2.05% (95% CI:-2.92;-1.18) , p-value<0.001) for GLP1-RA initiation versus DPP4 initiation for MACE. Conclusion Our findings suggest that GLP1-RA use is associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared to DPP4 inhibitors in a real-world population of patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. This supports the cardiovascular protective role of GLP1-RA in clinical practice.

Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Does Not Increase the Risk of Cancer in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are increasingly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) given their extra-pancreatic effects. However, there are concerns about carcinogenesis in the pancreas and thyroid gland. We aimed to evaluate the site-specific incidence of cancer in patients with T2DM-treated GLP-1 RAs using a nationwide cohort. This study included data obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (between 2004 and 2021). The primary outcome was newly diagnosed cancer, and the median follow-up duration for all participants was 8 years. After propensity score matching, 7,827 participants were analyzed; 2,609 individuals each were included in the GLP-1 RA, diabetes mellitus (DM) control, and non-DM control groups. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of subsequent cancer in patients with T2DM was 1.73, which was higher than that of individuals without DM, and it increased in both men and women. Analysis of patients with T2DM showed no increased cancer risk associated with the use of GLP-1 RA, and similar results were observed in both men and women. The IRRs of pancreatic cancer (0.74), thyroid cancer (1.32), and medullary thyroid cancer (0.34) did not significantly increase in the GLP-1 RA group compared with those in the DM control group. There was a 73% higher risk of cancer in patients with T2DM compared with the general population. However, among patients with T2DM, there was no association between the use of GLP-1 RAs and new-onset cancers, including pancreatic and medullary thyroid cancers.

The risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidal behavior in patients with obesity on glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy.

This large community-based cohort study investigates the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), specifically Liraglutide and Semaglutide, on the risk of developing psychiatric conditions such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal behaviors in patients with obesity. Utilizing post-marketing data, this research compares patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs (cases) with those not taking these medications (controls). The analysis spanned data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. To minimize selection bias, we employed 1:1 propensity score matching to account for demographic factors such as age, sex, race, and comorbidities. After matching, the study included 162,253 case and control patients. This study showed a significant association between GLP-1 RA treatment and an 98% increased risk of any psychiatric disorders. Notably, patients on GLP-1 RAs exhibited a 195% higher risk of major depression, a 108% increased risk for anxiety, and a 106% elevated risk for suicidal behavior. These findings underscore the critical need for physicians to thoroughly assess patient history before prescribing GLP-1 RAs and highlight the urgent requirement for further prospective clinical trials to fully understand the implications of GLP-1 RA use on mental health in the obese patient population.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on blood pressure in overweight or obese patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are novel medications with proven efficacy in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, and are increasingly being used for weight loss. They may potentially have benefit in treating metabolic disorders; however, evidence is sparse with regards to treating high blood pressure (BP). We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression investigating the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in lowering BP in obese or overweight patients. Three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to 13 February 2024. Pair-wise meta-analysis and random effects meta-regression models were utilized. Fixed effects meta-regression was used to unify treatment effects across different GLP-1 RA doses. We included a total of 30 RCTs with a combined population of 37 072 patients. GLP-1 RAs demonstrated a mean systolic BP (SBP) reduction of -3.37 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.95 to -2.80] and a mean diastolic BP (DBP) reduction of -1.05 mmHg (95% CI -1.46 to -0.65) compared with placebo. This effect was consistent across subgroups for diabetic status, formulation of GLP-1 RA, follow-up duration and route of administration for both SBP and DBP, with the exception of subgroups investigating exenatide. Meta-regression suggested no significant correlation between BP reduction and baseline characteristics such as age, percentage of male patients, HbA1c, weight, BMI, and percentage of patients with hypertension. Our meta-analysis suggests significant BP reduction benefits from GLP-1 RA use in obese or overweight patients, consistent across diabetic status, duration of treatment, and across route of administration.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists may benefit cardiopulmonary outcomes in patients with COPD

BackgroundClinical studies have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) can have beneficial effects on cardiopulmonary function. We conducted this longitudinal cohort study to compare the risk of cardiopulmonary...

8418 Association of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT-2 Inhibitors with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Serious Liver Events among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and MASLD

Abstract Disclosure: A. Kutz: None. D.J. Wexler: None. J. Liu: None. J.M. Paik: None. E. Patorno: None. Introduction and study question Little is known about the cardiovascular (CV) and hepatic effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and known metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in clinical practice. We assessed the comparative CV and hepatic effectiveness and the safety of GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i in people with T2D and prevalent MASLD. Methodology Using pooled data from Medicare fee-for-service (2013–2020) and a large U.S. health insurance database (2013-June 2022), we conducted two propensity-score fine stratification weighted cohort studies including adults with T2D and a diagnosis of MASLD who initiated GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i, reference). Using Cox proportional hazards models, we assessed the primary CV effectiveness composite outcome of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or all-cause mortality. The primary hepatic effectiveness outcome was a composite of serious liver events (hospitalization for ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, or liver transplantation). The safety outcome was a composite of severe adverse events (lower limb amputation, non-vertebral fracture, emergency admission for hypoglycemia, or hospitalization for acute kidney injury, diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA], severe genital or urinary tract infection, acute pancreatitis, or biliary event). Major results Compared with DPP-4i (n=17,084 initiators), the hazard ratio (HR) for the primary CV outcome associated with GLP-1 RA (n=13,666 initiators) was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81), corresponding to an incidence rate difference (IRD) per 1,000 person-years of -21.6 (95% CI, -26.7 to -16.6). The HR for the primary hepatic outcome was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.90), the IRD -2.1 (95% CI -3.4 to -0.9). Similar CV benefits were observed for SGLT-2i (n=11,108) vs DPP-4i (n=16,979), with a HR for the primary CV outcome of 0.82 (95% CI 0.70–0.96) and an IRD of -11.0 (95% CI -16.2 to -5.8). For the primary hepatic outcome, the HR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.44) and the IRD -1.1 (95% CI -2.4 to 0.3). Severe adverse events were not more frequent with GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i compared with DPP-4i. Interpretation and conclusion Among people with T2D and MASLD, the use of GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i was associated with fewer CV events, vs DPP-4i, while GLP-1 RA also reduced serious liver events. Compared with DPP-4i, GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i were not associated with higher safety adverse event rates. Presentation: 6/2/2024

7947 Semaglutide Induced Pancreatitis: A Case Report

Abstract Disclosure: T. Altaweel: None. A. Mathew: None. P. Chalasani: None. L. Lawrence: None. S. Hussain: None. N. Aldaoud: None. Introduction/Background: As semaglutide (GLP1 RA) has become a cornerstone in diabetes and weight management, there have been studies indicating pancreatic inflammation with GLP1 RA use. We report a case of acute necrotizing pancreatitis secondary to semaglutide use.Clinical Case: A 52 year old male with a history of hypertension, morbid obesity with BMI of 40 kg/m2, alcohol induced pancreatitis presented to the hospital complaining of epigastric pain. On presentation, he appeared in distress due to pain but was hemodynamically stable. Physical examination revealed a moderately distended abdomen, tender to palpation over the epigastric area without guarding, and negative Murphy’s sign. The patient reported no alcohol consumption, tobacco usage, or recent abdominal injuries. Laboratory workup revealed elevated WBC 14.6 thous/mcL (4.5-10.5) and lipase 1941 U/L (<60). Abdominal ultrasound showed common bile duct 2 mm without gallstones and CT abdomen revealed acute pancreatitis with suspected necrosis in the pancreatic head and the pancreatic tail. Patient was started on aggressive fluid hydration, pain management and admitted to intensive care. Patient reported that he was started on semaglutide three months ago for weight management by his primary care physician. Patient improved symptomatically with pain control and tolerated oral intake. He was discharged home with recommendations not to resume semaglutide. Conclusion: Semaglutide involves direct stimulation of GLP-1 receptors in pancreatic cells, potentially leading to cell overgrowth, increased pancreatic weight, duct occlusion and inflammation. Despite the SUSTAIN-6 trial indicating no increased risk of acute pancreatitis in diabetic patients using semaglutide, atypical presentations of pancreatitis are noted in patients using the medication for weight management. When all identifiable causes of pancreatitis are eliminated, semaglutide-induced pancreatitis should be a primary consideration in the differential diagnosis. Physicians should exercise caution and give careful consideration when prescribing semaglutide for weight management in patients with conditions that increase risk for pancreatitis. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Recent trends in GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i use among people with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the USA

IntroductionThis study aimed to assess recent trends in the US use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in people with type 2 diabetes...

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Use in Hospital: A Multicentre Observational Study

IntroductionGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are effective medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, yet their uptake among patients most likely to benefit has been slow. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medication exposure in adults hospitalized at 16 hospitals in Ontario, Canada between 2015 and 2022. We estimated the proportion with T2DM, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. We identified the frequency of GLP-1RA use, and conducted multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with their use. ResultsAcross 1,278,863 hospitalizations, 396,084 (31%) had T2DM and approximately 327,844 (26%) had obesity. GLP-1RA use (n=1,274) was low among those with a diagnosis of T2DM (0.3%) or obesity (0.7%), despite high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (36%). In contrast, use of diabetes medications lacking cardiovascular benefits was high during inpatient hospitalizations related to diabetes: 60% (n=236,612) received insulin and 14% (n=54,885) received a sulfonylurea. Apart from T2DM (OR=29.6, 95% CI 23.5, 37.2), characteristics associated with greater odds of receiving GLP-1RA were age 50-70 years (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.38, 2.11) compared to age < 50 years, hemoglobin A1C > 9% (OR=1.83, 95% CI 1.36, 2.47) compared to < 6.5%, and highest income quintile (OR=1.73, 95% CI 1.45, 2.07) compared to lowest income quintile. ConclusionKnowledge translation interventions are needed to address the low adoption of GLP-1RA among hospitalized patients with T2DM and obesity, who are the most likely to benefit.

S2351 GLP-1 RA Use in Patients with T2DM is Associated with Lower Risk of Gastric Cancer: A National Analysis

S2351 GLP-1 RA Use in Patients with T2DM is Associated with Lower Risk of Gastric Cancer: A National Analysis

S727 GLP-1 RA Use in Patients with T2DM is Associated with Lower Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A National Analysis

S727 GLP-1 RA Use in Patients with T2DM is Associated with Lower Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A National Analysis

A post-hoc pooled analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes with/without prior use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy

AimsTo evaluate treatment advancement with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), with or without prior glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). MethodsEfficacy and safety outcomes of insulin-naïve patients intensifying with Gla-300, with/without prior GLP-1 RA therapy, were evaluated in three analyses (N = 3562): a pooled analysis of seven interventional studies, a subanalysis comparing participants who stopped GLP-1 RA therapy and initiated Gla-300 with those who received add-on Gla-300, and an expanded analysis including two observational studies. ResultsGlycaemic outcomes, including HbA1c improvement and fasting plasma glucose, were similar between groups with/without prior GLP-1 RA use. HbA1c least squares mean change from baseline was − 1.7 % and − 1.6 % with and without prior GLP-1 RA, respectively. Glycaemic outcomes were similar between participants who stopped GLP-1 RA therapy when initiating Gla-300 and those who received add-on Gla-300, although more participants receiving add-on Gla-300 achieved HbA1c targets. The expanded analysis yielded similar results. Incidence of hypoglycaemia was low with no clinically relevant weight changes in all analyses. ConclusionsTreatment advancement with Gla-300 in patients with T2D, with/without prior GLP-1 RA therapy, improved glycaemic outcomes with no relevant impact on weight, while maintaining a low hypoglycaemia risk.

Prevalence of obesity and cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes and use of diabetes medication in Germany: A claims data study.

To identify the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Germany and to evaluate if antidiabetic treatment patterns varied by comorbidity status. Patients with T2D (aged ≥18 years) were identified during the study period (2014-2020) from medical claims of 4.5 million publicly insured German residents and divided into different cohorts based on CVD and/or obesity diagnosis. Annual prevalence and incidence were estimated for each study year, while characteristics and treatments were assessed in 2020. Data were extrapolated to the German population by age and sex. The prevalence of T2D in 2020 was 11.4%. Among patients with T2D, 53.0% had CVD, 39.3% had obesity, and 20.9% had CVD and obesity. Since 2014, CVD increased by 1.4%, obesity by 4.5%, and CVD with obesity by 2.7% in patients with T2D. The incidence of T2D in 2020 was 1.0% (42.9% had CVD, 37.9% had obesity, and 15.8% had CVD and obesity). Among the prevalent T2D population in 2020, 4.9% received glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), 9.7% received sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and 13.0% received GLP-1 RAs and/or SGLT2 inhibitors. Of those with CVD, 12.9% received GLP-1 RAs and/or SGLT2 inhibitors (without CVD, 13.2%). Of those with obesity, 19.4% received GLP-1RAs and/or SGLT2 inhibitors (without obesity, 9.0%). In this retrospective claims database study, more than two thirds of patients with T2D also had CVD, obesity, or both CVD and obesity. GLP-1 RA and SGLT2 inhibitor use remained low.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Cirrhosis and Related Complications in Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is an increasing cause of cirrhosis. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective in improving liver inflammation in patients with MASLD. To determine whether use of GLP-1 RAs is associated with lower risk of developing cirrhosis and its complications, including decompensation and hepatocellular cancer (HCC), among patients with MASLD. This retrospective cohort study with an active comparator, new-user design used data from the national Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse and Central Cancer Registry. Patients with MASLD and diabetes who were seen at 130 Veterans Health Administration hospitals and associated ambulatory clinics and who initiated either a GLP-1 RA or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2022, were included. Patients were followed up from baseline until one of the study outcomes or the end of the study period (December 31, 2022), whichever came first. Each GLP-1 RA new user was propensity score matched in 1:1 ratio to a patient who initiated a DPP-4i during the same month. Separate analyses were conducted among patients without and with cirrhosis at baseline. For patients without cirrhosis, the primary outcome was progression to cirrhosis defined by validated diagnoses codes or a noninvasive marker of liver fibrosis, and secondary outcomes were cirrhosis complications defined both as a composite and individual complications, including decompensation, HCC, or liver transplant, and all-cause mortality. For patients with cirrhosis, the primary outcome was a composite outcome of cirrhosis complications, and secondary outcomes were decompensation, HCC, and all-cause mortality. Of 16 058 patients who initiated GLP-1 RAs, 14 606 did not have cirrhosis (mean [SD] age, 60.56 [10.31] years; 13 015 [89.1%] male), and 1452 had cirrhosis (mean [SD] age, 66.99 [7.09] years; 1360 [93.7%] male) at baseline. These patients were matched to an equal number of patients who initiated a DPP-4i. In patients without cirrhosis, GLP-1 RA use, compared with DPP-4i use, was associated with a lower risk of cirrhosis (9.98 vs 11.10 events per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98). Similar results were seen for the secondary outcomes. GLP-1 RA use, compared with DPP-4i use, was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome of cirrhosis complications (1.89 vs 2.55 events per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.59-1.04) and mortality (21.77 vs 24.43 events per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98). There were no associations between GLP-1 RA use and outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. In this cohort study, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower risk of progression to cirrhosis and mortality among patients with MASLD and diabetes. The protective association was not seen in patients with existing cirrhosis, underscoring the importance of treatment earlier in the disease course.