Use Of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Articles

ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

OEIS Syndrome: Omphalocele, Exstrophy of the Cloaca, Imperforate Anus, and Spinal Defects

OEIS Syndrome: Omphalocele, Exstrophy of the Cloaca, Imperforate Anus, and Spinal Defects

A survey of pediatric diagnostic radiologists in North America: current practices in fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging examination in evolution. Rapid developments over recent decades have led to better image quality, an increased number of examinations and greater impact on patient care. To gather data regarding current practices among established programs in North America and provide information to radiologists interested in implementing or growing a fetal MRI service. An electronic survey containing 15 questions relevant to the use of fetal MRI was submitted to pediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists. Items regarded scheduling and reporting logistics, magnet strength, patient positioning and patient preparation. Answers and comments were collected, and descriptive statistics were summarized. One hundred and six survey responses were evaluated. Of the survey responses, 62/106 (58.5%) allow fetal MR scheduling any time during the day and 72/105 (68.6%) exclusively use 1.5-T strength platforms for fetal MRI, while only 7/105 (6.7%) use exclusively 3T. Patient positioning is variable: supine, 40/106 (37.8%); left lateral decubitus, 22/106 (20.8%), and, patient's choice, 43/106 (40.6%). Of the centers responding, 51/104 (49.0%) require no particular fasting instructions, while 20/104 (19.2%) request the patient avoid caffeine before the scanning. Logistical trends in performing fetal MRI may supplement the American College of Radiology's published technical standards and offer guidance to radiologists new to the field.

Evaluation of the fetal abdomen by magnetic resonance imaging. Part 1: malformations of the abdominal cavity.

Although ultrasound continues to be the mainstay modality for the evaluation of fetal disorders, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has often been used as a valuable adjunct in recent years. The exponential growth of the use of fetal MRI has been facilitated by technological advancements such as ultrafast T2-weighted sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging. Fetal MRI can achieve results that are comparable to or better than those of ultrasound, particularly in cases of maternal obesity, severe oligohydramnios, or abnormal fetal position. Because of its superior soft tissue contrast, wide field of view, and multiplanar imaging, fetal MRI is able to evaluate the large fetal organs, such as the lungs, liver, bowel, and kidneys. In addition, fetal MRI allows large or complex malformations to be examined, facilitating the understanding of the malformation within the context of the body as a whole. Initial fetal MRI studies were focused on the central nervous system. With advances in software and hardware, fetal MRI gained importance in the evaluation of the fetal abdomen. The purpose of this article is to review the recent literature and developments in MRI evaluation of the fetal abdomen, with an emphasis on imaging aspects, protocols, and common clinical indications.

Inter-rater reliability of the APD, SFU and UTD grading systems in fetal sonography and MRI

Antenatal hydronephrosis (ANH) is frequently detected on screening obstetric ultrasonography. Common ANH grading systems include the anterior-posterior diameter (APD) and the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grading system. Recent developments in the management of ANH include the use of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and a new grading system - Urinary Tract Dilation (UTD). This study reviewed patients who underwent fetal MRI and ultrasound, and compared the grading systems across these imaging modalities. Patients who underwent paired fetal MRI and ultrasound studies between January 2012 and January 2014 were included. Two pediatric urologists and a pediatric radiologist reviewed the studies. Data collected included APD, SFU grade, and UTD grade. Fleiss' kappa statistic determined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the SFU and UTD grading within each imaging modality. Intra-class correlation assessed the consistency of the APD measurements. Forty-seven patients and 88 renal units were evaluated. Median gestational age was 22 weeks. Kappa values of the SFU grading system indicated fair IRR for ultrasound imaging and moderate IRR for MRI imaging, while the UTD grading system reached moderate IRR for both. The IRR of the SFU grading system was improved with the use of MRI, while the UTD grading system was no different. The APD intraclass correlation coefficient improved significantly when measured by MRI. As the ultrasound SFU grade increased, the odds of the MRI SFU grade being scored higher increased by a factor of 3.7. There was no difference between ultrasound and MRI when using the UTD grading system. This study was the first to assess the UTD system in a cohort of patients who underwent paired ultrasound and MRI studies. The results suggested that the UTD system might improve IRR, compared with the SFU system. The use of fetal MRI may improve the IRR of the SFU grading system. It also found that the proportion of SFU grades was affected by the imaging modality, raising the possibility that MRI 'overcalls' the SFU grade, compared with ultrasound. This difference was not observed using the UTD grading system. The most important limitation was the selection bias favoring complex pathology with severe ANH diagnosed at an early gestational age. In this unique cohort, the UTD system improved IRR when compared to the SFU grading system. Fetal MRI improved the IRR of the SFU grading system, and improved the APD intraclass correlation. The SFU grading was likely to be higher when assessed by MRI vs ultrasound, but the UTD grade was not affected by the imaging modality.

The developing role of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac anomalies: A systematic review

Advances in the fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over the last few years have resulted in the exploring the use of fetal MRI to detect congenital cardiac anomalies. Early detection of congenital cardiac anomalies can help more appropriately manage the infant's delivery and neonatal management. MRI offers anatomical and functional studies and is a safe adjunct that can help more fully understand a fetus’ cardiac anatomy. It is important for the obstetricians and pediatric cardiologists to be aware of the recent advancements in fetal MRI and it`s potential utility in diagnosing congenital cardiac anomalies.

Prenatal Imaging

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development held a workshop on September 18-19, 2006, to summarize the available evidence on the role and performance of current fetal imaging technology and to establish a research agenda. Ultrasonography is the imaging modality of choice for pregnancy evaluation due to its relatively low cost, real-time capability, safety, and operator comfort and experience. First-trimester ultrasonography extends the available window for fetal observation and raises the possibility of performing an early anatomic survey. Three-dimensional ultrasonography has the potential to expand the clinical application of ultrasonography by permitting local acquisition of volumes and remote review and interpretation at specialized centers. New advances allow performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without maternal or fetal sedation, with improved characterization and prediction of prognosis of certain fetal central nervous system anomalies such as ventriculomegaly when compared with ultrasonography. Fewer data exist on the usefulness of fetal MRI for non-central nervous system anomalies.

Giant intracranial teratoma and lack of cortical development in a fetus

Antenatal diagnosis of an intracranial neoplasm is extremely rare. The authors describe a case in which a 21-week-old fetus was found, by using fetal ultrasonography, to have a large intracranial mass. Fetal magnetic resonance (MR) images, obtained at 21 and 25 weeks' gestation, supported the diagnosis of a teratoma. As the tumor increased in size, near-complete brain atrophy ensued. Premature labor was induced, and a nonviable fetus died within minutes of delivery. Postmortem analysis confirmed a teratoma occupying a major portion of the intracranial space. In cases in which abnormal brain development is suspected in a fetus, the use of fetal MR imaging can give a clearer picture of the pathological entity, which may allow for a more accurate diagnosis. The usefulness of fetal MR imaging in monitoring brain development and tumor growth during treatment planning is discussed.