Use Of Deformable Image Registration Research Articles

Deformable image registration for composite planned doses during adaptive radiation therapy

IntroductionSome patients have significant anatomic changes during radiotherapy, necessitating an adaptive repeat CT-simulation and re-planning. This yields two unique planning datasets that introduce uncertainty into total dose records. This study explored the impact of using deformable image registration (DIR) to spatially align repeat CT-simulation images and calculate total planned dose distributions. Materials & methodsData from 5 head-and-neck, 5 lung, and 5 sarcoma patients who had unanticipated re-planning during radiotherapy were analyzed in a treatment planning system (RayStation v6.1 RaySearch Laboratories). Total planned doses to normal tissues were calculated using two methods and the previously generated manual contours defined on each CT. The first method, termed ‘parameter addition’, simply sums the relevant DVH metrics from the initial and re-planned distributions without spatially registering the CTs. The second, termed ‘dose accumulation’, uses a validated hybrid contour/intensity-based DIR algorithm to deform initial CT and dose distribution onto the repeat CT and re-planning dose distribution. DVH metrics from the summed distribution on the repeat CT are then calculated. Dose differences for organs-at-risk between parameter addition and dose accumulation ≥100 cGy were assumed to be clinically relevant. To elucidate whether relevant differences were due to registration accuracy or contouring variability between CTs, the analysis was repeated using contours on the first CT and the same contours deformed to the repeat CT with DIR. ResultsFor all patients, high overall DIR accuracy was verified visually (qualitatively) and numerically (quantitatively) using image similarity and contour-based metrics. All head-and-neck and lung patients, and one sarcoma patient (11 of 15 total) had dose differences between parameter addition and dose accumulation ≥100 cGy, with absolute mean differences of 160 cGy (range 101–436 cGy) seen in 41 of 205 total DVH criteria. In 22 of these 41 criteria, these differences were attributed to contouring variability between CTs. After correcting for contouring variations using DIR, the mean absolute differences in 7 of these 22 criteria with a relevant result (across 6 patients) was 146 cGy (range 100–502 cGy). In only 4 DVH criteria, the DIR mapped contours had higher variations than the original contours. One lung patient had a DVH criteria exceeding the clinical dose constraint by 125 cGy with parameter addition, and with accurate DIR and dose accumulation, the criteria was actually 97 cGy lower than the constraint. ConclusionsThe use of DIR to generate total planned dose records revealed substantial dose differences in most cases compared to commonly used clinical methods (i.e. parameter addition), and altered the planned acceptance criteria in a minority. DIR is recommended to be used for future adaptive re-plans to generate total planned dose records and facilitate accurate re-contouring. More accurate dose records may also improve our understanding of clinical outcomes.

Deep learning based uncertainty prediction of deformable image registration for contour propagation and dose accumulation in online adaptive radiotherapy

Objective. Online adaptive radiotherapy aims to fully leverage the advantages of highly conformal therapy by reducing anatomical and set-up uncertainty, thereby alleviating the need for robust treatments. This requires extensive automation, among which is the use of deformable image registration (DIR) for contour propagation and dose accumulation. However, inconsistencies in DIR solutions between different algorithms have caused distrust, hampering its direct clinical use. This work aims to enable the clinical use of DIR by developing deep learning methods to predict DIR uncertainty and propagating it into clinically usable metrics. Approach. Supervised and unsupervised neural networks were trained to predict the Gaussian uncertainty of a given deformable vector field (DVF). Since both methods rely on different assumptions, their predictions differ and were further merged into a combined model. The resulting normally distributed DVFs can be directly sampled to propagate the uncertainty into contour and accumulated dose uncertainty. Main results. The unsupervised and combined models can accurately predict the uncertainty in the manually annotated landmarks on the DIRLAB dataset. Furthermore, for 5 patients with lung cancer, the propagation of the predicted DVF uncertainty into contour uncertainty yielded for both methods an expected calibration error of less than 3%. Additionally, the probabilisticly accumulated dose volume histograms (DVH) encompass well the accumulated proton therapy doses using 5 different DIR algorithms. It was additionally shown that the unsupervised model can be used for different DIR algorithms without the need for retraining. Significance. Our work presents first-of-a-kind deep learning methods to predict the uncertainty of the DIR process. The methods are fast, yield high-quality uncertainty estimates and are useable for different algorithms and applications. This allows clinics to use DIR uncertainty in their workflows without the need to change their DIR implementation.

MIRSIG position paper: the use of image registration and fusion algorithms in radiotherapy

The report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group No. 132 published in 2017 reviewed rigid image registration and deformable image registration (DIR) approaches and solutions to provide recommendations for quality assurance and quality control of clinical image registration and fusion techniques in radiotherapy. However, that report did not include the use of DIR for advanced applications such as dose warping or warping of other matrices of interest. Considering that DIR warping tools are now readily available, discussions were hosted by the Medical Image Registration Special Interest Group (MIRSIG) of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists & Engineers in Medicine in 2018 to form a consensus on best practice guidelines. This position statement authored by MIRSIG endorses the recommendations of the report of AAPM task group 132 and expands on the best practice advice from the ‘Deforming to Best Practice’ MIRSIG publication to provide guidelines on the use of DIR for advanced applications.

Quantitative CT Characteristics of Cluster Phenotypes in the Severe Asthma Research Program Cohorts.

Background Clustering key clinical characteristics of participants in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP), a large, multicenter prospective observational study of patients with asthma and healthy controls, has led to the identification of novel asthma phenotypes. Purpose To determine whether quantitative CT (qCT) could help distinguish between clinical asthma phenotypes. Materials and Methods A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted with the use of qCT images (maximal bronchodilation at total lung capacity [TLC], or inspiration, and functional residual capacity [FRC], or expiration) from the cluster phenotypes of SARP participants (cluster 1: minimal disease; cluster 2: mild, reversible; cluster 3: obese asthma; cluster 4: severe, reversible; cluster 5: severe, irreversible) enrolled between September 2001 and December 2015. Airway morphometry was performed along standard paths (RB1, RB4, RB10, LB1, and LB10). Corresponding voxels from TLC and FRC images were mapped with use of deformable image registration to characterize disease probability maps (DPMs) of functional small airway disease (fSAD), voxel-level volume changes (Jacobian), and isotropy (anisotropic deformation index [ADI]). The association between cluster assignment and qCT measures was evaluated using linear mixed models. Results A total of 455 participants were evaluated with cluster assignments and CT (mean age ± SD, 42.1 years ± 14.7; 270 women). Airway morphometry had limited ability to help discern between clusters. DPM fSAD was highest in cluster 5 (cluster 1 in SARP III: 19.0% ± 20.6; cluster 2: 18.9% ± 13.3; cluster 3: 24.9% ± 13.1; cluster 4: 24.1% ± 8.4; cluster 5: 38.8% ± 14.4; P < .001). Lower whole-lung Jacobian and ADI values were associated with greater cluster severity. Compared to cluster 1, cluster 5 lung expansion was 31% smaller (Jacobian in SARP III cohort: 2.31 ± 0.6 vs 1.61 ± 0.3, respectively, P < .001) and 34% more isotropic (ADI in SARP III cohort: 0.40 ± 0.1 vs 0.61 ± 0.2, P < .001). Within-lung Jacobian and ADI SDs decreased as severity worsened (Jacobian SD in SARP III cohort: 0.90 ± 0.4 for cluster 1; 0.79 ± 0.3 for cluster 2; 0.62 ± 0.2 for cluster 3; 0.63 ± 0.2 for cluster 4; and 0.41 ± 0.2 for cluster 5; P < .001). Conclusion Quantitative CT assessments of the degree and intraindividual regional variability of lung expansion distinguished between well-established clinical phenotypes among participants with asthma from the Severe Asthma Research Program study. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Verschakelen in this issue.

Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy - the need for guidance and QA tools.

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of the clinical use of deformable image registration (DIR) in radiotherapy and to gain an understanding of the challenges faced by centres in clinical implementation of DIR, including commissioning and quality assurance (QA), and to determine the barriers faced. The goal was to inform whether additional guidance and QA tools were needed.Methods:A survey focussed on clinical use, metrics used, how centres would like to use DIR in the future and challenges faced, was designed and sent to 71 radiotherapy centres in the UK. Data were gathered specifically on which centres we using DIR clinically, which applications were being used, what commissioning and QA tests were performed, and what barriers were preventing the integration of DIR into the clinical workflow. Centres that did not use DIR clinically were encouraged to fill in the survey and were asked if they have any future plans and in what timescale.Results:51 out of 71 (70%) radiotherapy centres responded. 47 centres reported access to a commercial software that could perform DIR. 20 centres already used DIR clinically, and 22 centres had plans to implement an application of DIR within 3 years of the survey. The most common clinical application of DIR was to propagate contours from one scan to another (19 centres). In each of the applications, the types of commissioning and QA tests performed varied depending on the type of application and between centres. Some of the key barriers were determining when a DIR was satisfactory including which metrics to use, and lack of resources.Conclusion:The survey results highlighted that there is a need for additional guidelines, training, better tools for commissioning DIR software and for the QA of registration results, which should include developing or recommending which quantitative metrics to use.Advances in knowledge:This survey has given a useful picture of the clinical use and lack of use of DIR in UK radiotherapy centres. The survey provided useful insight into how centres commission and QA DIR applications, especially the variability among centres. It was also possible to highlight key barriers to implementation and determine factors that may help overcome this which include the need for additional guidance specific to different applications, better tools and metrics.

An international survey on the clinical use of rigid and deformable image registration in radiotherapy.

ObjectivesRigid image registration (RIR) and deformable image registration (DIR) are widely used in radiotherapy. This project aims to capture current international approaches to image registration.MethodsA survey was designed to identify variations in use, resources, implementation, and decision‐making criteria for clinical image registration. This was distributed to radiotherapy centers internationally in 2018.ResultsThere were 57 responses internationally, from the Americas (46%), Australia/New Zealand (32%), Europe (12%), and Asia (10%). Rigid image registration and DIR were used clinically for computed tomography (CT)‐CT registration (96% and 51%, respectively), followed by CT‐PET (81% and 47%), CT‐CBCT (84% and 19%), CT‐MR (93% and 19%), MR‐MR (49% and 5%), and CT‐US (9% and 0%). Respondent centers performed DIR using dedicated software (75%) and treatment planning systems (29%), with 84% having some form of DIR software. Centers have clinically implemented DIR for atlas‐based segmentation (47%), multi‐modality treatment planning (65%), and dose deformation (63%). The clinical use of DIR for multi‐modality treatment planning and accounting for retreatments was considered to have the highest benefit‐to‐risk ratio (69% and 67%, respectively).ConclusionsThis survey data provides useful insights on where, when, and how image registration has been implemented in radiotherapy centers around the world. DIR is mainly in clinical use for CT‐CT (51%) and CT‐PET (47%) for the head and neck (43–57% over all use cases) region. The highest benefit‐risk ratio for clinical use of DIR was for multi‐modality treatment planning and accounting for retreatments, which also had higher clinical use than for adaptive radiotherapy and atlas‐based segmentation.

Fast predictive simple geodesic regression.

Deformable image registration and regression are important tasks in medical image analysis. However, they are computationally expensive, especially when analyzing large-scale datasets that contain thousands of images. Hence, cluster computing is typically used, making the approaches dependent on such computational infrastructure. Even larger computational resources are required as study sizes increase. This limits the use of deformable image registration and regression for clinical applications and as component algorithms for other image analysis approaches. We therefore propose using a fast predictive approach to perform image registrations. In particular, we employ these fast registration predictions to approximate a simplified geodesic regression model to capture longitudinal brain changes. The resulting method is orders of magnitude faster than the standard optimization-based regression model and hence facilitates large-scale analysis on a single graphics processing unit (GPU). We evaluate our results on 3D brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) from the ADNI datasets.

Evolutionary Machine Learning for Multi-Objective Class Solutions in Medical Deformable Image Registration

Current state-of-the-art medical deformable image registration (DIR) methods optimize a weighted sum of key objectives of interest. Having a pre-determined weight combination that leads to high-quality results for any instance of a specific DIR problem (i.e., a class solution) would facilitate clinical application of DIR. However, such a combination can vary widely for each instance and is currently often manually determined. A multi-objective optimization approach for DIR removes the need for manual tuning, providing a set of high-quality trade-off solutions. Here, we investigate machine learning for a multi-objective class solution, i.e., not a single weight combination, but a set thereof, that, when used on any instance of a specific DIR problem, approximates such a set of trade-off solutions. To this end, we employed a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to learn sets of weight combinations for three breast DIR problems of increasing difficulty: 10 prone-prone cases, 4 prone-supine cases with limited deformations and 6 prone-supine cases with larger deformations and image artefacts. Clinically-acceptable results were obtained for the first two problems. Therefore, for DIR problems with limited deformations, a multi-objective class solution can be machine learned and used to compute straightforwardly multiple high-quality DIR outcomes, potentially leading to more efficient use of DIR in clinical practice.

EP-2038 Use of deformable image registration for automatic outlining of the rectum

EP-2038 Use of deformable image registration for automatic outlining of the rectum

Review of Deformable Image Registration for Clinical Application

One of the characteristics of deformable image registration (DIR) is to detect anatomical coincidence points between two different images. The advantages of using DIR with radiotherapy are as follows. (1) to support the determination of the target using images of modality and series different from the treatment plan image, and (2) to evaluate the dose administered to the target and risk organs by summing the multiple dose distributions. Although DIR has been widely used in the field of external irradiation, application in the field of brachytherapy has been widespread in recent years. Also, the use of DIR is tried for quantitative assessment of anatomical changes over time during the treatment period and determination of the treatment effect after completion of treatment.In this article, we describe the outline of the technique and the evidence of the current status about the application of DIR in clinical practice.

"Patient-specific validation of deformable image registration in radiation therapy: Overview and caveats".

Over the last few decades, deformable image registration (DIR) has gained popularity in image-guided radiation therapy for a number of applications, such as contour propagation, dose warping, and accumulation. Although this raises promising perspectives for the improvement of treatment outcomes and quality of radiotherapy clinical practice, the variety of proposed DIR algorithms, combined with the lack of an effective quantitative quality control metric of the registration, is slowing the transfer of DIR into the clinical routine. Recently, a task group (AAPM TG132) report was published outlining the essential aspects of DIR for image guidance in radiotherapy. However, an accurate and efficient patient-specific validation is not yet defined, and appropriate metrics should be identified to achieve the definition of both geometric and dosimetric accuracy. In this respect, the use of a dense set of anatomical landmarks, along with additional evaluations on contours or deformation field analysis, are likely to drive patient-specific DIR validation in clinical image-guided radiotherapy applications to account for geometric inaccuracies. Automatic and efficient strategies able to provide spatial information of DIR uncertainties and to evaluate monomodal and multimodal image registration, as well as to describe homogenous and un-contrasted regions are believed to represent the future direction in DIR validation. But especially in the case of DIR applications for dose mapping and accumulation, the need of accurate patient-specific validation is not only limited to the evaluation of geometric accuracy. In fact, the need to account for dosimetric inaccuracies due to DIR represents another important area in the field of adaptive treatments. Different approaches are currently being investigated to quantify the effect of DIR error on dose analysis, mainly relying on clinically relevant dose metrics, or on the study of deformation field properties for a voxel-by-voxel evaluation. However, novel research is required for the definition of dedicated and personalized measures capable to relate the geometric and dosimetric inaccuracies, thus bearing useful information for a safe use of DIR by clinical end users. In this paper we provide insights on DIR results evaluation on a patient-specific basis, facing the issues of both geometric and dosimetric paradigms. Challenges on DIR validation are overviewed and discussed, in order to push preliminary clinical guidelines forward on this fundamental topic and boost the implementation of more robust and reliable patient-specific evaluation metrics.

The use of deformable image registration to integrate diagnostic MRI into the radiotherapy planning pathway for head and neck cancer

Background and purposeTo assess the accuracy of gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using a diagnostic position MRI (MRI-D) deformably registered to the planning CT (pCT), by comparison with a dedicated planning position MRI (MRI-RT). Material and methodsFourteen patients with HNSCC underwent a T1-weighted MRI-D and MRI-RT. A reference GTV was defined as that delineated on MRI-RT rigidly registered to pCT. GTVs were delineated on: MRI-D and then registered to pCT by deformable image registration over the whole image (DIR-whole); MRI-D and then registered to pCT with rigid registration over a region of interest defined as GTV+3cm (Rigid-ROI); and on the pCT alone. These were compared using positional metrics to the reference. ResultsGTVs delineated on MRI-D followed by DIR-whole were significantly more accurate than those delineated on CT alone. The mean Dice Similarity Coefficient was 0.6 and 0.72 for pCT and DIR-whole respectively. Use of MRI-D with Rigid-ROI provided no advantage over CT-only delineation. ConclusionsContouring on MRI-RT rigidly registered to pCT should be considered as the gold standard for HNSCC. In radiotherapy centres lacking a dedicated MRI-RT, the use of an MRI-D with DIR-whole offers a significant advantage for the accuracy of GTV delineation over contouring on pCT alone.

MO-E-BRC-03: Fast Online Replanning Techniques

Online adaptive radiation therapy has the potential to ensure delivery of optimal treatment to the patient by accounting for anatomical and potentially functional changes that occur from one fraction to the next and over the course of treatment. While on-line adaptive RT (ART) has been a topic of many publications, discussions, and research, it has until very recently remained largely a concept and not a practical implementation. However, recent advances in on-table imaging, use of deformable image registration for contour generation and dose tracking, faster and more efficient plan optimization, as well as fast quality assurance method has enabled the implementation of ART in the clinic in the past couple of years. The introduction of these tools into routine clinical use requires many considerations and progressive knowledge to understand how processes that have historically taken hours/days to complete can now be done in less than 30 minutes. This session will discuss considerations to perform real time contouring, planning and patient specific QA, as well as a practical workflow and the required resources. Learning Objectives: 1.To understand the difficulties, challenges and available technologies for online adaptive RT. 2.To understand how to implement online adaptive therapy in a clinical environment and to understand the workflow and resources required. 3.To understand the limitations and sources of uncertainty in the online adaptive process I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; R. Kashani, I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; X. Li, Research supported by Elekta Inc.

MO-E-BRC-02: MRI-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy: The UCLA Approach to Quality Management

Online adaptive radiation therapy has the potential to ensure delivery of optimal treatment to the patient by accounting for anatomical and potentially functional changes that occur from one fraction to the next and over the course of treatment. While on-line adaptive RT (ART) has been a topic of many publications, discussions, and research, it has until very recently remained largely a concept and not a practical implementation. However, recent advances in on-table imaging, use of deformable image registration for contour generation and dose tracking, faster and more efficient plan optimization, as well as fast quality assurance method has enabled the implementation of ART in the clinic in the past couple of years. The introduction of these tools into routine clinical use requires many considerations and progressive knowledge to understand how processes that have historically taken hours/days to complete can now be done in less than 30 minutes. This session will discuss considerations to perform real time contouring, planning and patient specific QA, as well as a practical workflow and the required resources. Learning Objectives: 1.To understand the difficulties, challenges and available technologies for online adaptive RT. 2.To understand how to implement online adaptive therapy in a clinical environment and to understand the workflow and resources required. 3.To understand the limitations and sources of uncertainty in the online adaptive process I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; R. Kashani, I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; X. Li, Research supported by Elekta Inc.

MO-E-BRC-00: Online Adaptive Radiotherapy - Considerations for Practical Clinical Implementation

Online adaptive radiation therapy has the potential to ensure delivery of optimal treatment to the patient by accounting for anatomical and potentially functional changes that occur from one fraction to the next and over the course of treatment. While on-line adaptive RT (ART) has been a topic of many publications, discussions, and research, it has until very recently remained largely a concept and not a practical implementation. However, recent advances in on-table imaging, use of deformable image registration for contour generation and dose tracking, faster and more efficient plan optimization, as well as fast quality assurance method has enabled the implementation of ART in the clinic in the past couple of years. The introduction of these tools into routine clinical use requires many considerations and progressive knowledge to understand how processes that have historically taken hours/days to complete can now be done in less than 30 minutes. This session will discuss considerations to perform real time contouring, planning and patient specific QA, as well as a practical workflow and the required resources. Learning Objectives: 1.To understand the difficulties, challenges and available technologies for online adaptive RT. 2.To understand how to implement online adaptive therapy in a clinical environment and to understand the workflow and resources required. 3.To understand the limitations and sources of uncertainty in the online adaptive process I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; R. Kashani, I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; X. Li, Research supported by Elekta Inc.

MO-E-BRC-01: Online Adaptive MR-Guided RT: Workflow and Clinical Implementation

Online adaptive radiation therapy has the potential to ensure delivery of optimal treatment to the patient by accounting for anatomical and potentially functional changes that occur from one fraction to the next and over the course of treatment. While on-line adaptive RT (ART) has been a topic of many publications, discussions, and research, it has until very recently remained largely a concept and not a practical implementation. However, recent advances in on-table imaging, use of deformable image registration for contour generation and dose tracking, faster and more efficient plan optimization, as well as fast quality assurance method has enabled the implementation of ART in the clinic in the past couple of years. The introduction of these tools into routine clinical use requires many considerations and progressive knowledge to understand how processes that have historically taken hours/days to complete can now be done in less than 30 minutes. This session will discuss considerations to perform real time contouring, planning and patient specific QA, as well as a practical workflow and the required resources. Learning Objectives: 1. To understand the difficulties, challenges and available technologies for online adaptive RT. 2. To understand how to implement online adaptive therapy in a clinical environment and to understand the workflow and resources required. 3. To understand the limitations and sources of uncertainty in the online adaptive process I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; R. Kashani, I have research funding from ViewRay Inc. and Philips Medical Systems.; X. Li, Research supported by Elekta Inc.

Dose distribution for gynecological brachytherapy with dose accumulation between insertions: Feasibility study

PurposeFor gynecological treatments, it is standard to acquire CT images and preferably also MR images before each treatment to calculate the dose of the day. The dose of the complete treatment is calculated by adding the dose metrics of each fraction. It makes the conservative assumption that the same part of the organs at risk always receives the highest dose. The dose calculated this way often limits the prescription dose or the target coverage. We investigated the use of deformable image registration (DIR) as an alternative method to assess the cumulative dose for a treatment course. Methods and materialsRigid registration is preformed on CT images, followed by DIR. DIR can be based either solely on the three-dimensional images or combined with organ contours. To improve DIR in the pelvic region with low CT contrast, we propose (1) using contours drawn on CT or (2) modifying artificially the contrast in certain volumes. The dose matrix from fraction_n (n > 1) is deformed using a calculated deformation field. ResultsThe use of the contrast-enhanced images or of contour information helps to guide the DIR. However, because of the very high dose gradients involved in brachytherapy, the uncertainty on the accumulated dose remains of the order of 5–10%. Even for good contour matching, a small local error in the deformation can have significant consequences for the dose distribution. ConclusionsUsing DIR, based on image features and contours, allows to accumulate the dose from different brachytherapy fractions. A robust validation procedure should be developed.

EP-1820: On the use of deformable image registration to evaluate the need to perform ART in head and neck cancer

EP-1820: On the use of deformable image registration to evaluate the need to perform ART in head and neck cancer

SU-E-J-106: The Use of Deformable Image Registration with Cone-Beam CT for a Better Evaluation of Cumulative Dose to Organs

Purpose: The knowledge of dose accumulation in the patient tissues in radiotherapy helps in determining the treatment outcomes. This project aims at providing a workflow to map cumulative doses that takes into account interfraction organ motion without the need for manual re-contouring. Methods: Five prostate cancer patients were studied. Each patient had a planning CT (pCT) and 5 to 13 CBCT scans. On each series, a physician contoured the prostate, rectum, bladder, seminal vesicles and the intestine. First, a deformable image registration (DIR) of the pCTs onto the daily CBCTs yielded registered CTs (rCT) . This rCT combined the accurate CT numbers of the pCT with the daily anatomy of the CBCT. Second, the original plans (220 cGy per fraction for 25 fractions) were copied on the rCT for dose re-calculation. Third, the DIR software Elastix was used to find the inverse transform from the rCT to the pCT. This transformation was then applied to the rCT dose grid to map the dose voxels back to their pCT location. Finally, the sum of these deformed dose grids for each patient was applied on the pCT to calculate the actual dose delivered to organs. Results: The discrepancy between the planned D98more » and D2 and these indices re-calculated on the rCT, are, on average, of −1 ± 1 cGy and 1 ± 2 cGy per fraction, respectively. For fractions with large anatomical motion, the D98 discrepancy on the re-calculated dose grid mapped onto the pCT can raise to −17 ± 4 cGy. The obtained cumulative dose distributions illustrate the same behavior. Conclusion: This approach allowed the evaluation of cumulative doses to organs with the help of uncontoured daily CBCT scans. With this workflow, the easy evaluation of doses delivered for EBRT treatments could ultimately lead to a better follow-up of prostate cancer patients.« less

Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.

Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of head and neck (H&N) cancer patients may be improved by plan adaptation. The decision to adapt the treatment plan based on a dose recalculation on the current anatomy requires a diagnostic quality computed tomography (CT) scan of the patient. As gantry-mounted cone beam CT (CBCT) scanners are currently being offered by vendors, they may offer daily or weekly updates of patient anatomy. CBCT image quality may not be sufficient for accurate proton dose calculation and it is likely necessary to perform CBCT CT number correction. In this work, the authors investigated deformable image registration (DIR) of the planning CT (pCT) to the CBCT to generate a virtual CT (vCT) to be used for proton dose recalculation. Datasets of six H&N cancer patients undergoing photon intensity modulated radiation therapy were used in this study to validate the vCT approach. Each dataset contained a CBCT acquired within 3 days of a replanning CT (rpCT), in addition to a pCT. The pCT and rpCT were delineated by a physician. A Morphons algorithm was employed in this work to perform DIR of the pCT to CBCT following a rigid registration of the two images. The contours from the pCT were deformed using the vector field resulting from DIR to yield a contoured vCT. The DIR accuracy was evaluated with a scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) algorithm comparing automatically identified matching features between vCT and CBCT. The rpCT was used as reference for evaluation of the vCT. The vCT and rpCT CT numbers were converted to stopping power ratio and the water equivalent thickness (WET) was calculated. IMPT dose distributions from treatment plans optimized on the pCT were recalculated with a Monte Carlo algorithm on the rpCT and vCT for comparison in terms of gamma index, dose volume histogram (DVH) statistics as well as proton range. The DIR generated contours on the vCT were compared to physician-drawn contours on the rpCT. The DIR accuracy was better than 1.4 mm according to the SIFT evaluation. The mean WET differences between vCT (pCT) and rpCT were below 1 mm (2.6 mm). The amount of voxels passing 3%/3 mm gamma criteria were above 95% for the vCT vs rpCT. When using the rpCT contour set to derive DVH statistics from dose distributions calculated on the rpCT and vCT the differences, expressed in terms of 30 fractions of 2 Gy, were within [-4, 2 Gy] for parotid glands (D(mean)), spinal cord (D(2%)), brainstem (D(2%)), and CTV (D(95%)). When using DIR generated contours for the vCT, those differences ranged within [-8, 11 Gy]. In this work, the authors generated CBCT based stopping power distributions using DIR of the pCT to a CBCT scan. DIR accuracy was below 1.4 mm as evaluated by the SIFT algorithm. Dose distributions calculated on the vCT agreed well to those calculated on the rpCT when using gamma index evaluation as well as DVH statistics based on the same contours. The use of DIR generated contours introduced variability in DVH statistics.