Use Of Computer Navigation Research Articles

Thoracolumbar injuries: operative treatment: indications, techniques, timing and implant removal. Current practice.

The operative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures is a rapidly evolving improvement in the care of patients with this injury after trauma. This article describes the different techniques and principles. Considerations and methods of treatment are scientifically addressed and illustrated according to the classification and severity of the fracture pattern. The use of computer navigation and optimisation of minimally invasive techniques is inevitable. The timing of surgery as well the removal of the material after fracture healing are also discussed. The operative treatment of spinal fractures is emerging and there is still much more knowledge to gain.

Use of Computer Navigation for Optimal Acetabular Cup Placement in Revision THA: Case Reports and Surgical Techniques

The outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) have become increasingly important as their volume increases. Computer navigation, a reliable method to improve component positioning during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), is not well studied in the rTHA setting. Given that dislocation rates following rTHA are significantly higher than those of primary THA, component positioning becomes paramount in these cases. Here, we present two case reports and surgical techniques, one of a 77-year-old man undergoing rTHA for recurrent hip instability following primary THA, and one of a 61-year-old woman undergoing rTHA for severe iliopsoas bursitis who was at increased risk for instability and dislocation given her history of large segment spinal fusion. Both patients achieved optimal acetabular component positioning after rTHA with imageless computer navigation. The use of imageless computer navigation in rTHA provides accurate and reproducible component positioning during acetabular rTHA.

Planned Glenoid Implant Utilization: A Comparison of Preoperative Planning with and Without Computer-Assisted Navigation.

Preoperative planning for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is becoming increasingly common. While preoperative planning allows surgeons to determine individualized implant types, utilization of intraoperative navigation improves the accuracy of implant placement and may increase confidence in the preoperative plan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate at which surgeons use a glenoid implant different than their preoperative plan with and without the use of computer navigation. A retrospective review of a multicenter prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was conducted between 2016 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were primary aTSA or rTSA with an available preoperative plan and record of the actual implant used. Change in glenoid implant was defined as a deviation in the final implant from the preoperative plan in regard to backside shape (nonaugmented vs augment or differing augment shape). We included 1,915 shoulder arthroplasties (525 aTSA, 1,390 rTSA) performed with preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation and 110 shoulder athroplasties (37 aTSA, 73 rTSA) performed with preoperative planning alone. Overall, the final glenoid implant deviated from the preoperative plan less frequently when intraoperative navigation was used compared with preoperative planning alone (1.9% [n = 36] versus 7.3% [n = 8], P = 0.002). When stratified by procedure, deviation from the preoperative plan occurred significantly less for rTSA when preoperative planning was used with intraoperative navigation versus planning alone (2% [n = 29] versus 11% [n = 8], P < 0.001; OR = 0.17 [95% CI = 0.07 to 0.46]), but not aTSA (1% [n = 7] versus 0% [n = 0], P = 1). Use of intraoperative navigation was independently associated with lower odds of deviation from the preoperative plan on multivariable logistic regression (OR = 0.25 [95% CI = 0.11 to 0.56], P = 0.001). Use of intraoperative navigation is associated with increased adherence to the preoperative plan for primary rTSA. Use of navigation may increase surgeon confidence despite known limitations of glenoid visualization during this procedure. This may offer advantages in outpatient surgery centers and smaller hospitals where inventory space may be limited. Ⅲ, retrospective cohort study.

Robotics and Navigation Do Not Affect the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.

The use of computer navigation or robotic assistance during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has yielded numerous benefits due to more accurate component positioning. The utilization of these tools is generally associated with longer operative times and also necessitates additional surgical equipment and personnel in the operating room. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of technology assistance on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary THA. We retrospectively reviewed the records for 12,726 patients who had undergone primary THA at a single high-volume institution between 2018 and 2021. Patients were stratified by surgical technique (conventional THA, computer-navigated THA [CN-THA], or robotic-assisted THA [RA-THA]) and were matched 1:1 with use of propensity score matching. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the rates of PJI within 90 days postoperatively between the cohorts. After propensity score matching, there were 4,006 patients in the THA versus RA-THA analysis (2,003 in each group) and 5,288 patients in the THA versus CN-THA analysis (2,644 in each group). CN-THA (p < 0.001) and RA-THA (p < 0.001) were associated with longer operative times compared with conventional THA by 3 and 11 minutes, respectively. The rates of PJI after conventional THA (0.2% to 0.4%) were similar to those after CN-THA (0.4%) and RA-THA (0.4%). On the basis of logistic regression, the development of PJI was not associated with the use of computer navigation (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7 to 5.3]; p = 0.232) or robotic assistance (OR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.3]; p = 0.808). Despite longer operative times associated with the use of computer navigation and robotic assistance, the use of these tools was not associated with an increased risk of PJI within 90 days after surgery. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The use of computer navigation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision: a case report.

Revision shoulder surgery is always a challenge, especially in the management of periprosthetic joint infection. Staged surgery with antibiotic-loaded cement spacer, seems to yield satisfactory and encouraging results. New technologies such as computer navigation are additional tools that could aid surgeons in particular conditions where the native anatomy is distorted. This study presents the unique experience of revision shoulder surgery with computer navigation assistance. Benefits related to this approach could lead to better prosthesis longevity and survivorship.

Wound Complication and Surgical Site Infection in Sarcoma Patients Undergoing Internal Hemipelvectomy

Abstract Background Hemipelvectomy is associated with a significant risk of wound complications, including infections, bleeding, and injuries to nearby neurovascular structures as well as the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract. This study aimed to determine the patient characteristics and approach to treatment that could affect the occurrence of surgical site infection or wound complications in sarcoma patients who have undergone hemipelvectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 33 adult patients who underwent hemipelvectomy at a large tertiary academic cancer center from 2008 to 2016. We used χ 2 (exact Fisher) test to investigate the association between wound complication and categorical variables. We used a t test to evaluate the difference in numerical variables for outcomes. Results Among 33 patients, 12 patients (36.4%) experienced wound complications after hemipelvectomy. The average age of patients with wound complications was 63.3 years (57.1 ± 15.4 years), significantly higher than that of patients without wound complications (P = 0.004). Without adjustment, the use of computer navigation had a lower wound complication rate (P = 0.027). Patients with wound complications had longer hospital length of stay (14.8 vs 7.0 days, P = 0.016). Patient and surgical characteristics were not associated with surgical site infection. Five patients (15%) developed surgical site infection, and they had longer hospital stay (19.4 vs 8.1 days, P = 0.001). Conclusion Older patients undergoing hemipelvectomy are at an increased risk of developing wound complications with a prolonged hospital stay. Initial antimicrobial therapy for suspected surgical site infection should include broad-spectrum coverage to include skin and gastrointestinal flora.

A retrospective study of articular surface mounting computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty in alignment, knee function, and survival

Background Hong Kong Chinese exhibits a greater varus lower limb mechanical axis and coronal bowing when compared to Caucasians. This anatomical difference may affect the accuracy of bone cuts in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using western anatomy-based intramedullary TKA cutting jigs. Use of computer navigation may avoid suboptimal cuts due to altered anatomy. This is the first study evaluating clinical function, radiological alignment and long-term survival of computer-assisted TKA amongst Hong Kong Chinese patients. Methods Retrospective study comparing articular surface mounting computer-assisted TKA (ASM-CATKA) and conventional TKA performed in a single centre from 2008 to 2010. Patients were followed up for ​assessment of clinical parameters including range of motion, Knee Society Knee score, and radiological parameters such as limb alignment, component alignment, and survival. Results Seventy-five patients were included in this study. Baseline clinical and radiological data were similar between groups. The computer-navigated group had superior radiological mechanical alignment ( p &lt; 0.001), tibial component alignment ( p = 0.016) and femoral component alignment ( p &lt; 0.01) when compared to conventional TKA. There were no differences in knee scores ( p = 0.488), range of motion ( p = 0.432) and survival at 117 months ( p = 0.986) between the two groups. Conclusion This retrospective study showed that ASM-CATKA was more accurate in achieving neutral mechanical axis and component alignment amongst Hong Kong Chinese. Clinical outcomes and implant survival were comparable.

Computer Navigation vs. Conventional Overlay Methods in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Single Surgeon Experience.

The use of computer navigation (CN) is expanding in direct anterior (DA) total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we investigated the use of a noninvasive, fluoroscopic-based, CN technology suite on operative outcomes in a single surgeon DA THA practice. Computer-navigated DA THA decreases leg length discrepancy(LLD) variationand fluoroscopic radiation dose without adding operative time compared to the traditional overlay (OL) technique. A retrospective review was performed on a total of 109 primary DA THA patients, with 58 in the CN and 51 in the OL group.Outcome metrics were postoperative LLD, radiation dose per case, and operative time.Statistical analysis was completed with Mann-Whitney U tests for differences between the means for LLD, radiation dose, and operative time. No difference was observed in postoperative LLD between the CN (average: 1.8 mm)and OL (average: 1.9 mm) groups (p = 0.458).A significant reduction in average radiation dose (mGy) per case within the CN group (8.17 ±6.09 mGy) compared to the OL group (13.17 ± 7.75 mGy) (p < 0.02) was observed. The average operative time in the CN group was 80 ± 18 minutes compared to 120 ± 32 minutes in the OL group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in LLD between the two groups.The addition of CN into a DA THA practice decreased both average radiation dose and operative time when compared to the standard OL technique.

Use of computer navigation and robotics in adult spinal deformity

Recent years have seen significant advancements in the implementation of computer-assisted surgery in spine. Enabling technologies like robots and navigation have been refined to compliment the field's shift towards minimally invasive techniques and to fit more seamlessly into the existing workflow. Robotic-surgery and navigation in deformity can be particularly helpful in cases where the severe curves of the spinal column or the abnormal pedicle anatomy make pedicle screw placement challenging with the use of traditional anatomic landmarks. Furthermore, the ability to pre-plan patient specific rods has opened the door for greater precision in rod contouring. Drawbacks of robotic-assisted surgery include the steep upfront cost, the need for additional staff and training and the lack of tactile feedback. This review will discuss the current state of navigation and robotics, with a specific focus on their applications to deformity surgery.

No Difference in Quality-Of-Life Outcomes in the First 7 Years Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Computer Navigation Versus Conventional Referencing: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BackgroundComputer navigation techniques can potentially improve both the accuracy and precision of prosthesis implantation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but its impact on quality-of-life outcomes following surgery remains unestablished. MethodsAn institutional arthroplasty registry was queried to identify patients with TKA performed between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2019. Propensity score matching based on demographical, medical, and surgical variables was used to match computer-navigated to conventionally referenced cases. The primary outcomes were Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey scores (VR-12 PCS and MCS), Short Form 6 Dimension utility values (SF-6D), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the first 7 years following surgery. ResultsA total of 629 computer-navigated TKAs were successfully matched to 1,351 conventional TKAs. The VR-12 PCS improved by a mean of 12.75 and 11.94 points in computer-navigated and conventional cases at 12-month follow-up (P = .25) and the VR-12 MCS by 6.91 and 5.93 points (P = .25), respectively. The mean VR-12 PCS improvement at 7-year follow-up (34.4% of the original matched cohort) for navigated and conventional cases was 13.00 and 12.92 points (P = .96) and for the VR-12 MCS was 4.83 and 6.30 points (P = .47), respectively. The mean improvement in the SF-6D utility score was 0.164 and 0.149 points at 12 months (P = .11) and at 7 years was 0.115 and 0.123 points (P = .69), respectively. Computer-navigated cases accumulated 0.809 QALYs in the first 7 years, compared to 0.875 QALYs in conventionally referenced cases (P = .65). There were no differences in these outcomes among a subgroup analysis of obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2). ConclusionThe use of computer navigation did not provide an incremental benefit to quality-of-life outcomes at a mean of 2.9 years following primary TKA performed for osteoarthritis when compared to conventional referencing techniques.

No-touch smartphone technique to confirm acetabular cup position in Total Hip Replacement

In order to achieve good results following Total hip replacement , proper and reproducible acetabular cup placement is of paramount importance. The safe zone described by Lewwinick is still considered to be the target cup position. Various techniques have been used to improve the precision and accuracy of cup placement including the use of computer navigation which is often prohibitively expensive for developing countries. We present a ‘No touch smartphone technique’ to check positioning of acetabular cup intra operatively, without compromising the sterility of the operative field which we have found to be simple, quick, inexpensive and reproducible.

Computer Navigation for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces Dislocation Rates.

Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers potential for more accurate placement of acetabular components, avoiding impingement, edge loading, and dislocation, all of which can necessitate revision THA (rTHA). Therefore, the use of computer navigation may be particularly beneficial in patients undergoing rTHA. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of computer-assisted hip navigation reduces the rate of dislocation in patients undergoing rTHA. A retrospective review of 72 patients undergoing computer-navigated rTHA between February 2016 and May 2017 was performed. Demographics, indications for revision, type of procedure performed, and incidence of postoperative dislocation were collected for all patients. Clinical follow-up was recorded at 3months, 1year and 2years. All 72 patients (48% female; 52% male) were included for analysis. The mean age was 70.4 ± 11.2years and mean BMI was 26.4 ± 5.2kg/m2. 22 of 72 patients (31%) required a rTHA procedure due to instability resulting in dislocation. At 3months, 1year, and 2years, there were no dislocations (0%). There was a significant reduction in dislocation rate after computer-navigated rTHA (0%) relative to that following primary THA in the same patient cohort (31%; p < 0.05). Our study demonstrates a significant reduction in dislocation rate following rTHA with computer navigation. Although the cause of postoperative dislocation is often multifactorial, the use of computer navigation may help to curtail femoral and acetabular malalignment in rTHA. Level III: retrospective.

Utilization of technology-assisted total hip arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2018.

BackgroundSuccessful outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA) rely in part on accurate component positioning, which may be optimized through the use of computer navigation and robot-assistance. Therefore, we queried a large national database to characterize national trends in technology-assisted THA utilization, determine whether these technologies were associated with increased hospital charges, and identify demographic factors associated with technology-assisted THA.MethodsUsing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, patients that underwent conventional THA, computer-navigated THA, and robot-assisted THA from 2005 to 2018 were identified. Patient and hospital demographics, charge data, and payer characteristics were collected. Temporal trends in utilization were reported. Univariate analyses were performed to compare differences between groups with multiple logistic regression analysis to account for confounders.ResultsIn total, 3,428,208 patients undergoing THA from 2005 to 2018 were identified, of which 63,136 (1.8%) used computer navigation and 32,660 (1.0%) used robot-assistance. National utilization of computer navigation in THA increased from 0.1% to 1.9% between 2005 and 2018, while utilization of robot-assisted THA increased from <0.1% to 2.1% from 2008 to 2018. On multivariate analysis, technology-assisted THA was most commonly performed in urban hospitals in the Northeastern United States. Median hospital charges were increased for technology-assisted THAs relative to conventional THAs ($66,089 ± $254 vs $55,418 ± $43).ConclusionsComputer navigation and robot-assistance in THA demonstrated a consistent increase in utilization during the period examined, representing 4.0% of THAs performed in 2018. Patient and hospital characteristics including risk of mortality, geographic region, and teaching status were associated with increased utilization. Utilization of computer navigation was associated with increased hospital charges.

The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

The use of computer navigation has been shown to produce more accurate cup positioning when compared with non-navigated total hip arthroplasty (THA), but so far there is only limited evidence to show its effect on clinical outcomes. The present study analyzed data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to assess the impact of computer navigation on the rates of all-cause revision and revision for dislocation following THA. Data for all non-navigated and navigated primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis in Australia from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019, were examined to assess the rate of revision. We analyzed the effects of navigation on rate, reason, and type of revision. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, and head size, were utilized. Because of known prosthesis-specific differences in outcomes, we performed a further analysis of the 5 acetabular and femoral component combinations most commonly used with navigation. Computer navigation was utilized in 6,912 primary THAs for osteoarthritis, with the use of navigation increasing from 1.9% in 2009 to 4.4% of all primary THAs performed in 2019. There was no difference in the rate of all-cause revision between navigated and non-navigated THAs looking at the entire group. There was a lower rate of revision for dislocation in the navigation THA cohort. The cumulative percent revision for dislocation at 10 years was 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2% to 0.6%) for navigated compared with 0.8% (95% CI, 0.8% to 0.9%) for non-navigated THAs (HR adjusted for age, sex, and head size, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.74; p = 0.002). In the 5 component combinations most commonly used with navigation, the rate of all-cause revision was significantly lower when these components were navigated compared with non-navigated. The cumulative percent revision at 10 years for these 5 prostheses combined was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.6% to 3.4%) for navigated compared with 4.2% (95% CI, 4.0% to 4.5%) for non-navigated THAs (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.86; p = 0.003). This study showed that the use of computer navigation was associated with a reduced rate of revision for dislocation following THA. Furthermore, in the component combinations most commonly used with navigation there was also a reduction in the rate of all-cause revision. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Use of Computer Navigation and Robotic Technology in Complex Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The potential benefits of computer-assisted surgical (CAS) navigation and robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems, such as increased reliability of restoring the mechanical axis, fewer outliers, more rapid hospital discharge, less physical therapy requirements, decreased blood loss, and decreased revision rates, have led to their application not only in primary cases but also in complex cases such as preoperative deformity and revision. Early evidence demonstrates that CAS navigation may help to improve alignment in complex cases of femoral and tibial deformity and in cases of femoral bowing. Data regarding deformity correction with robotic systems are similar to CAS navigation with regard to alignment, but are more limited. There are also scant data regarding revision cases and cases of previous intramedullary canal instrumentation. Concerns remain regarding cost, learning curves, and operative times. There are potential long-term cost savings associated with a decrease in revisions and readmissions that require additional investigation. Early evidence for the use of these emerging technologies for deformity correction and revision cases is promising, but their impact on long-term functional outcomes remains to be demonstrated. Additional well-designed comparative studies are warranted.

Reduced postoperative morbidity in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective comparison of 225,123 cases

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common elective surgical procedures in the United States, with more than 650,000 performed annually. Computer navigation technology has recently been introduced to assist surgeons with planning, performing, and assessing TKA bone cuts. The aim of this study is to assess postoperative complication rates after TKA performed using computer navigation assistance versus conventional methods. MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for unilateral TKA cases from 2008 to 2016. The presence of the CPT modifier for use of computer navigation was used to separate cases of computer-navigated TKA from conventional TKA. Multivariate and propensity-matched logistic regression analyses were performed to control for demographics and comorbidities. ResultsThere were 225,123 TKA cases included; 219,880 were conventional TKA (97.7%) and 5,243 were navigated (2.3%). Propensity matching identified 4,811 case pairs. Analysis demonstrated no significant differences in operative time, length of stay, reoperation, or readmission, and no differences in rates of post-op mortality at 30 days postoperatively. Compared to conventional cases, navigated cases were at lower risk of serious medical morbidity (18% lower, p = 0.009) within the first 30 days postoperatively. ConclusionAfter controlling for multiple known risk factors, navigated TKA patients demonstrated lower risk for medical morbidity, predominantly driven by lower risk for blood transfusion. Given these findings, computer-navigation is a safe surgical technique in TKA.

The in vivo impact of computer navigation on screw number and length in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Little information exists regarding the benefit of computer navigation in shoulder arthroplasty in the clinical setting. This study aims to quantify how computer navigation affects the number and length of screws used during in vivo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) placement. A retrospective review of a research database was performed from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019 to identify patients who underwent primary RSA before and after the use of computer navigation. One-hundred consecutive RSAs were selected from the computer navigation implantation date; then, 100 consecutive sex-matched RSAs were chosen prior to navigation implantation in reverse chronological order. Baseplate augments were chosen based on surgeon discretion, with the goal of restoring version to within 10 degrees of neutral and inclination to neutral or slightly inferior with removal of the smallest amount of subchondral bone possible. Screws were placed with the goal of at least 3 screws with good purchase and added as needed, with up to 5 screws utilized. We compared demographic factors, comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, number of screws, screw length, number of wasted screws, and number of cases with bone graft used behind the baseplate between the 2 groups. Chi-squared test was used for bivariate analysis and student t-test was used for continuous variables. A total of 200 RSAs were included, with 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.3 years) performed prior to computer navigation compared to 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.7 years) performed using computer navigation. The total number of screws used in RSAs without computer navigation was 414 screws; the total used in the computer navigation cases was 344. RSAs placed with computer navigation used significantly fewer screws per case (3.4 vs. 4.1 screws; p<0.001) and had a significantly longer average screw length (35.0mm vs. 32.6mm; p<0.001). Three screws were implanted in 61% of computer navigation cases compared to 1% of cases without computer navigation (p<0.001). Screws 30mm in length or longer were more commonly used in patients undergoing RSA using computer navigation (84.6% vs. 73.7%; p<0.001). This study shows that computer navigation in RSA leads to longer and fewer glenoid baseplate screws being implanted. Computer navigation appears to assist with better screw placement, which may have similar clinical benefits of better glenoid fixation. Additionally, using fewer screws can save glenoid bone stock, avoid added glenoid stress risers, and decrease operative time.

Which is the better choice? A clinical cohort study protocol evaluating the differences between standard medial parapatellar and minimally invasive approaches in total knee replacement.

Background:There is still a lack of consensus on the best approach for total knee replacement (TKR). We carried out this present retrospective cohort study to assess the overall safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive approach without the use of computer navigation in comparison with conventional TKR.Methods:A retrospective review of patients who receiving the primary TKR in the same institution from 2014 to 2016 was conducted. The inclusion criteria for the study indicated that the patient required a unilateral or bilateral TKR was between 18 and 80 years’ old, provided informed consent, was followed up for at least 2 years, and was in stable health. There was no treatment for any condition or condition that might pose a risk of excessive surgery. The same TKR standard rehabilitation program was provided to all patients. Data were collected on patient demographics, anesthesia style, American Society of Anesthesiology scores, tourniquet duration, and surgical drainage loss. Our primary outcome measure was discharge time. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, imaging location 6 weeks after surgery, Oxford Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and knee ROM. Complications were recorded and classified as surgical site, thromboembolic, systemic, or requiring reoperation.Results:It was assumed that there is a remarkable difference in postoperative outcomes between the 2 groups.Conclusion:The limitations of our present research include the inherent limitations in any retrospective cohort research, including the observation bias and possibility of selection.Trial registration:This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6349).

The Use of Computer Navigation and Patient Specific Instrumentation in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Everyday Practice, Just for Special Cases or Actually Teaching a Surgeon?

Background:The use of computer assisted surgery, navigation (NAV) in shoulder arthroplasty is still under discussion, regarding the clinical outcome and prosthesis longevity, especially when combining these factors with cost, time and surgeon’s experience. Beside the NAV, there has been in use patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) as an additional tool for more precise glenoid implant position. Surgical NAV and PSI for glenoid implant positioning in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are in last years under observation and discussion.Objective:To critically review and evaluate the current literature regarding the use of computer navigation and PSI in shoulder arthroplasty.Methods:Critical review of the existing literature.Results:Cost-effectiveness, prosthesis longevity and revision arthroplasty rate have not yet been proven clinically. Moreover, heterogeneity is high in studies that include different positioning systems (NAV, PSI and standard instrumentation). Heterogeneity is due to differences in surgical technique, implants, surgeon’s expertise, radiographic image analysis technique.Conclusion:The use of navigation systems and PSI should be clinically proven in the shoulder arthroplasty. Independent experts’ opinion and independent high level studies lack at the moment. There will be still a lot of talk regarding this topic in future.

894. Patient and Surgery Characteristics on Wound Complication and Surgical Site Infection in Sarcoma Patients undergoing Hemipelvectomy

BackgroundHemipelvectomy is associated with a significant risk of wound complications, including infections, bleeding and injuries to nearby neurovascular structures as well as the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract. This study aimed to determine the patient characteristics and approach to treatment that could affect the occurrence of surgical site infection or wound complications in sarcoma patients undergone hemipelvectomy.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 33 adult patients who underwent hemipelvectomy at Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, from 2008 to 2016. We used Chi-square (Exact Fisher) test to investigate the association between wound complication and categorical variables. We used a T-test to evaluate the difference in numerical variables for outcomes.ResultsOut of 33 patients, 12 (36.4%) patients experienced wound complications after hemipelvectomy (Table 1). The average age of patients with wound complications was 63.3 3 (57.1±15.4) years old, significantly higher than that of patients without wound complications (p=0.004). Without adjustment, the use of computer navigation had a lower wound complication rate (p=0.027). Patients with wound complications had longer hospital length of stay (14.8 vs. 7.0 days, p=0.016). Among patients with surgical site infection (Table 2), there were no patients’ characteristics or surgical characteristics associated with this outcome. Five (15%) patients developed surgical site infection and they had longer hospital stay (19.4 vs. 8.1 days, p=0.001). The organisms identified from wound cultures include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, viridans Streptococcus, Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus, Enterobacter cloacae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans. The organisms in late infections (more than 6 months since surgery), included above organisms plus Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter xylosidans. ConclusionOlder patients undergoing hemipelvectomy are at an increased risk of developing wound complications with a prolonged hospital stay. Initial antimicrobial therapy for suspected surgical site infection should include a broad-spectrum coverage to include skin and gastrointestinal flora.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures