Use Of Clinical Preventive Services Research Articles

Racial trends in clinical preventive services use, chronic disease prevalence, and lack of insurance before and after the Affordable Care Act.

To compare the relative change in the use of clinical preventive services, prevalence of chronic disease, and share uninsured among White, Black, and Hispanic adults before and after the introduction of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Retrospective analysis using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey of adults aged 18 to 64 years. The regression relies on a fully interacted set of indicator variables of each racial group by 3 time periods: 2005-2009, 2010-2013, and 2014-2018. Outcomes included indicators of mammography, colonoscopy, and lipid panel use. Several chronic conditions were examined, including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and mental health status. The final outcome variables examined health insurance (uninsured or not) and out-of-pocket spending as a share of family income. Regression models were used controlling for patient characteristics (age, income, education) and for a set of fully interacted indicator variables of race and time period. We tested for relative changes in White adults vs minority adults for each outcome variable. We used the Wald test (test command in Stata) to test for relative changes over time. We found reductions in baseline (pre-ACA) disparities over time in several of the measures between minority adults and White adults. This included greater growth in the use of mammograms and colonoscopies among minority populations. The results also saw relative reductions in hypertension, coronary heart disease, and fair or poor mental health. Finally, the share uninsured among Hispanic adults decreased at a faster rate than among White adults pre-ACA compared with the ACA period examined. The ACA is associated with a reduction in baseline differences in the use of some clinical preventive services, chronic disease prevalence, health insurance coverage, and out-of-pocket spending. Continued efforts to promote prevention and further expansions of coverage would appear to pay dividends.

Trends in the Impact of Medicaid Expansion on the Use of Clinical Preventive Services

This study aims to evaluate the trends in the impact of Medicaid expansion on the use of selected recommended clinical preventive services and examine the differences in use by income level over time. The data were obtained from the 2011-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and were analyzed in 2021. This study conducted a difference-in-differences analysis of the association between Medicaid expansion and the use of 5 clinical preventive services, including colon/breast/cervical cancer screenings, HIV testing, and influenza vaccination. Annual percentage change was applied to assess the trends in the impact of Medicaid expansion on the use of clinical preventive services. The use of all the 5 clinical preventive services varied over time. In almost every year, the use of 4 clinical preventive services (all but HIV testing) among Medicaid expansion states was higher than that among the nonexpansion states. People with lower income used 4 clinical preventive services (all but HIV testing) less frequently than those with higher income, regardless of their residence in expansion or nonexpansion groups. Among the lower-income group, the use of 5 clinical preventive services increased after Medicaid expansion almost every year, with the use of colon cancer screening and HIV testing reaching statistical significance and the impact of Medicaid expansion in the use of each clinical preventive service kept stable from 2014 to 2019. These findings provide evidence that Medicaid expansion may be associated with sustainably increased use of the selected recommended clinical preventive services among the lower-income population and that Medicaid expansion to reduce financial barriers may be an effective strategy to improve population health.

Use of Selected Recommended Clinical Preventive Services - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2018.

Clinical preventive services play an important role in preventing deaths, and Healthy People 2020 has set national goals for using clinical preventive services to improve population health (1). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires many health plans to cover certain recommended clinical preventive services without cost-sharing when provided in-network (covered clinical preventive services).* To ascertain prevalence of the use of selected recommended clinical preventive services among persons aged ≥18 years, CDC analyzed data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a state-based annual nationwide survey conducted via landline and mobile phones in the United States, for 10 clinical preventive services covered in-network with no cost-sharing pursuant to the ACA. The weighted prevalence of colon, cervical, and breast cancer screening, pneumococcal and tetanus vaccination, and diabetes screening ranged from 66.0% to 79.2%; the prevalence of the other four clinical preventive services were <50%: 16.5% for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, 26.6% for zoster (shingles) vaccination, 33.2% for influenza vaccination, and 45.8% for HIV testing. Prevalence of HIV testing had the widest variation (3.1-fold differences) across states among the 10 services included in this report. The prevalence of use of clinical preventive services varied by insurance status, income level, and rurality, findings that are consistent with previous studies (2-6). The use of nine of the 10 services examined was lower among the uninsured, those with lower income, and those living in rural communities. Among those factors examined, insurance status was the dominant factor strongly associated with use of clinical preventive services, followed by income-level and rurality. Understanding factors influencing use of recommended clinical preventive services can potentially help decision makers better identify policies to increase their use including strategies to increase insurance coverage.

Abstract PO-262: Achieving health equity in cancer preventive services: NIH Workshop insights on barriers and the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions and strategies

Abstract Background: Evidence-based guidelines for preventive services are developed by expert groups such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to help Americans stay healthy. Despite the proven value of evidence-based preventive services (e.g., screenings, provider counseling, and preventive medications), implementation by providers and uptake by patients vary, contributing to disparities in disease burden and life expectancy. The NIH convened a workshop with multidisciplinary and multisector participants in June 2019 to assess the available scientific evidence on achieving health equity in the use of clinical preventive services for three leading causes of death: diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Methods: The workshop was framed around five key questions (KQ) and included a systematic evidence review, speaker presentations, and public discussion. KQ 1-2 considered the effects of barriers on the part of providers and patients to adopting and implementing evidence-based preventive services, and how they contribute to health disparities. KQ 3-5 addressed the effectiveness of health information technology and health care organization interventions to reduce disparities in preventive services use. An unbiased, independent panel of experts considered the scientific evidence in addition to speaker and audience perspectives to develop a report of findings and recommendations for addressing disparities in the use of ten clinical preventive services recommended by the USPSTF. Results: Overall, the need for more research on the effects of barriers was identified. However, compared with heart disease and diabetes, the barriers to adopting preventive services for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening have received greater attention. While patient navigation was shown to be effective in increasing cancer screening rates, strategies for bundling preventive services and implementing health information technologies require more study. The importance of addressing unmet basic needs related to health and enhancing community resources to reduce disparities were recurring themes throughout the workshop. Lastly, there were implications for more research in cancer dissemination and implementation. Conclusion: Chronic diseases, including heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, are responsible for seven of every ten deaths in the U.S. each year. Greater use of proven clinical preventive services could avert the loss of millions of life-years. Achieving health equity in preventive services is feasible, but requires efforts at the patient, provider, healthcare organization, and community levels, and greater attention to addressing social determinants of health. Citation Format: Antoinette Percy-Laurry, Richard Berzon, Jennifer Croswell, Carrie Klabunde, Melissa Green Parker, LeShawndra Price, Pamela Thornton, Kate Winseck, Xinzhi Zhang. Achieving health equity in cancer preventive services: NIH Workshop insights on barriers and the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions and strategies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-262.

Use of Clinical Preventive Service and Related Factors in Middle-Aged Postmenopausal Women in Korea.

Postmenopausal women experiencing health transitions can improve health-related quality of life through clinical health service use. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting clinical preventive service use, focusing on a multi-dimensional approach among middle-aged postmenopausal women. This descriptive study is a secondary analysis of the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANESVII-1) in 2016. Among the 8150 participants, our analysis included 771 naturally menopausal women aged 40–65. National health insurance (OR = 1.659, 95% CI = 1.080–2.550), private health insurance (OR = 2.877, 95% CI = 1.665–4.971), needs for health service (OR = 2.363, 95% CI = 1.332–4.195), cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.570, 95% CI = 1.009–2.445), hospital admission (OR = 3.054, 95% CI = 1.298–7.184), smoking (OR = 0.262, 95% CI = 0.144–0.477), drinking (OR = 0.573, 95% CI = 0.335–0.979), and depression (OR = 0.535, 95% CI = 0.340–0.841) were associated with clinical preventive service use among middle-aged postmenopausal women. To promote clinical preventive service use among postmenopausal women, policies promoting health behavior expansion should be introduced and should consider the predictive variables revealed by this study.

Linking primary care and community organizations to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: the HAPPI project.

The Healthy Aging Partnerships in Prevention Initiative (HAPPI) aims to increase the use of clinical preventive services (CPS) among underserved Latinos and African Americans in South Los Angeles who are 50+ years old. HAPPI uses an evidencebased model, SPARC, to leverage existing resources and link community resources. HAPPI's multi-sectoral partnerships include local non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community health centers (CHCs), aging and public health agencies serving the City and County of Los Angeles, and a university. Activities include CHC capacity assessment and training, and community capacity-building that included a small grants program. We engaged five CHCs in quality improvement activities and eight NGOs in networking and programming to increase awareness and receipt of CPS. We discuss barriers and facilitators including the success of trainings conducted with CHC providers and NGO re- presentatives. Multi-sectoral collaborations hold promise for increasing awareness and use of CPS in underserved communities.

Cancer Risk Among Older Adults: Time for Cancer Prevention to Go Silver.

Over two-thirds of all new cancers are diagnosed among adults aged ≥60 years. As the number of adults living to older ages continues to increase, so too will the number of new cancer cases. Can we do more as a society to reduce cancer risk and preserve health as adults enter their 60s, 70s, and beyond? Cancer development is a multi-step process involving a combination of factors. Each cancer risk factor represents a component of cancer causation, and opportunities to prevent cancer may exist at any time up to the final component, even years after the first. The characteristics of the community in which one lives often shape cancer risk-related behaviors and exposures over time, making communities an ideal setting for efforts to reduce cancer risk at a population level. A comprehensive approach to cancer prevention at older ages would lower exposures to known causes of cancer, promote healthy social and physical environments, expand the appropriate use of clinical preventive services, and engage older adults in these efforts. The collection of articles in this supplement provide innovative insights for exciting new directions in research and practice to expand cancer prevention efforts for older adults. This brief commentary sets the stage for the papers that follow.

EVIDENCE-BASED CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PRACTICE PATTERNS IN DIVERSE MIDDLE-AGED AND OLDER FEMALE POPULATIONS WITH AND WITHOUT ANY LIMITATIONS

Enhancing the use of clinical preventive services and closing the access gap in middle-aged and older adults is a key joint priority of the Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Administration on Aging. We identified disparities in U.S. Preventive Services Task Force evidence-based cervical cancer screening practices in middle-aged and older females with and without any limitations. Our overall approach involved use of publically available nationally representative Medical Expenditure Survey longitudinal data from calendar years 2004–2014 of community-dwelling females ages 50–75 with and without any limitation. We found middle-aged and older females with any limitation in comparison to females with no limitation were less likely to have received cervical cancer screening (OR=0.64, p<0.001). Studies need to evaluate if less use of cancer screening in females with disabilities protects them from subsequent downstream harms.

CITY-LEVEL ADULT STROKE PREVALENCE IN RELATION TO REMOTE SENSING DERIVED PM2.5 ADJUSTING FOR UNHEALTHY BEHAVIORS AND MEDICAL RISK FACTORS

Abstract. This research explores the use of PM2.5 gird derived from remote sensing for assessing the effect of long-term exposure to PM2.5 (ambient air pollution of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 μm or less) on stroke, adjusting for unhealthy behaviors and medical risk factors. Health data was obtained from the newly published CDC “500 Cities Project” which provides city- and census tract-level small area estimates for chronic disease risk factors, and clinical preventive service use for the largest 500 cities in the United States. PM2.5 data was acquired from the “The Global Annual PM2.5 Grids from MODIS, MISR and SeaWiFS Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), V1 (1998–2012)” datasets. Average PM2.5 were calculated for each city using a GIS zonal statistics function. Map data visualization and pattern comparison, univariate linear regression, and a multivariate linear regression model fitted using a generalized linear model via penalized maximum likelihood found that long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 may increase the risk of stroke. Increasing physical activity, reducing smoking and body weight, enough sleeping, controlling diseases such as blood pressure, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and cholesterol, may mitigate the effect. PM2.5 grids derived from moderate resolution satellite remote sensing imagery may offer a unique opportunity to fill the data gap due to limited ground monitoring at broader scales. The evidence of raised stroke prevalence risk in high PM2.5 areas would support targeting of policy interventions on such areas to reduce pollution levels and protect human health.

Risk factors associated with multiple correlated health outcomes in the 500 Cities Project

Reducing chronic disease is a major health challenge. Risk factors for chronic diseases are often studied at the individual level, even though interventions and policies may be implemented at the city level. We use an ecologic study design with city-level data, to simultaneously assess the relative impact of unhealthy behaviors and preventive care measures on multiple chronic disease health outcomes. We analyze a newly available, large national dataset called the 500 Cities Project. We examine the associations between city-level prevalence of unhealthy behaviors, clinical preventive service use, and all chronic disease health outcomes in 500 of the largest U.S. cities for year 2014. After adjusting for age and demographic characteristics, using MANOVA we found that the top three risk factors for all health outcomes are smoking (Pillai's trace = 0.95, approx. F = 688.7, p-value < 0.0001), lack of physical activity (Pillai's trace = 0.91, approx. F = 380.0, p-value < 0.0001) and binge drinking (Pillai's trace = 0.91, approx. F = 348.8, p-value < 0.0001), which are statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Higher prevalence of an annual dental checkup, a preventive service use measure, is correlated with lower prevalence of several chronic diseases such as diabetes (correlation coefficient r = −0.88), poor physical health (r = −0.91), stroke (r = −0.85), cardiovascular disease (r = −0.83) and poor mental health (r = −0.82). Identifying important chronic disease risk factors at the city-level may provide more actionable information for policymakers to improve urban health.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Priorities for Prevention Research

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) makes recommendations about clinical preventive services. The USPSTF examines chains of direct and indirect evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of a clinical preventive service. Missing links across the chains of evidence reflect gaps in the research. Evidence gaps can occur for preventive services that receive a letter grade recommendation and those that receive an I statement (insufficient evidence). This article describes the types of evidence gaps that the USPSTF encounters across its various recommendations and how the USPSTF identifies and communicates these gaps to researchers and policymakers, who can help generate the needed evidence. Common types of evidence gaps include limited evidence in primary care settings and populations, a lack of appropriate health outcomes, limited evidence linking behavior change to health outcomes, and a lack of evidence for effective preventive services in diverse populations. The USPSTF annual report to Congress focuses on the evidence gaps of new recommendations from the past year and is sent to leading research funding agencies. The Office of Disease Prevention at NIH uses this report to help direct future funding opportunities that may address these evidence gaps. The USPSTF plays a critical role in highlighting the information needed to advance the science to optimize the use of clinical preventive services in primary care.

Health Insurance Status and Clinical Cancer Screenings Among U.S. Adults.

Health insurance coverage is linked to clinical preventive service use. This study examined cancer screenings among U.S. adults by health insurance status. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System collected data on healthcare access and cancer screenings from 42 states and the District of Columbia in 2014. Data analyses were conducted in 2016. Participants' health insurance status during the preceding 12 months was categorized as adequately insured, underinsured, or never insured. Primary type of insurance coverage was categorized as employer-based or Medicare (aged ≥65 years), self-purchased plan, Medicaid/Medicare (aged <65 years), and other public insurance. Clinical cancer screenings were assessed following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Compared with adequately insured adults, underinsured and never insured women were 6% (p<0.001) and 41% (p<0.001) less likely to receive breast cancer screening, respectively; 1% (p<0.05) and 19% (p<0.001) less likely to receive cervical cancer screening, respectively; and 3% (p<0.01) and 47% (p<0.001) less likely to receive colorectal cancer screening, respectively; underinsured and never insured men were 6% (p<0.001) and 52% (p<0.001) less likely to receive colorectal cancer screening, respectively. Compared with adults with employer-based insurance/Medicare (aged ≥65 years), women with all other types of insurance were less likely to receive breast and cervical cancer screenings; women and men with self-purchased plans were less likely to receive colorectal cancer screening; however, men with other public insurance were more likely to receive colorectal cancer screening. Disparities in cancer screenings by health insurance status and type of insurance exist among U.S. adults. Greater efforts to increase screening rates and to reduce disparities in cancer screenings are an important strategy to help improve overall population health.

Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.

Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.

Psychological Distress and the Use of Clinical Preventive Services by Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

In this study, we explored whether psychological distress plays a role in the use of recommended clinical preventive services among community-dwelling older adults. The sample is drawn from respondents 65 years and older who participated in the 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Logistic regressions with selected covariates were entered in the model to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the independent effect of psychological distress on the utilization of each of five preventive services. With the exception of breast cancer screening where the uptake of preventive services was significantly lower for older adults with psychological distress (OR = 0.57, p < .001), uptake of other key preventive measures revealed no significant utilization differences between older adults with and without psychological distress. The results suggest that adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines may be increased by improving recognition and treatment of emotional health problems in older women.

Improving Medical Student Education About Preventive Services

AbstractBackground: The majority of clinical preventive services are underused in primary care contributing to premature death and illness. Educational gaps on the topics of wellness and prevention in medical schools may lead to less use of preventive services among medical students as they start to practice medicine. Research suggests that incorporation of prevention education interventions into medical schools core curriculum leads to increased use of clinical preventive services in primary care. Purpose: The purpose of the project was to develop an innovative prevention education module for third-year medical students and evaluate its impact on their knowledge, attitudes, behavior and self-efficacy regarding clinical preventive services. Methods: Sixty-three medical students were recruited when they started their rotation in family medicine during their third year of Jefferson Medical College. The project employed a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design in which we compared students who received the educational intervention and those who did not receive the intervention within the same rotation period. Descriptive analysis was conducted for all outcome variables and participant characteristics. A two-way (2x2) repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze all outcome variables. Results: Thirty-three medical students in the intervention group were compared with thirty medical students in the comparison group. All completed the pre and post education questionnaire. The mean age of subjects was 25.6 (SD=2.3, range=22-33) with no difference between the groups. Students in the intervention group showed greater change in knowledge and improvement in self-efficacy compared to the control group. Conclusion: Since increased knowledge and self-efficacy are known determinants of behaviour change, this approach may result in behavior and practice change among medical students with regard to use of preventive services.

Patient-centered medical home implementation and use of preventive services: the role of practice socioeconomic context.

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model of primary care is being implemented in a wide variety of socioeconomic contexts, yet there has been little research on whether its effects differ by context. Clinical preventive service use, including cancer screening, is an important outcome to assess the effectiveness of the PCMH within and across socioeconomic contexts. To determine whether the relationship between the PCMH and cancer screening is conditional on the socioeconomic context in which a primary care physician practice operates. A longitudinal study spanning July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2012, using data from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Physician Group Incentive Program was conducted. Michigan nonpediatric primary care physician practices that participated in the Physician Group Incentive Program (5452 practice-years) were included. Sample size and outlier exclusion criteria were applied to each outcome. We examined the interaction between practices' PCMH implementation scores and their socioeconomic context. The implementation of a PCMH was self-reported by the practice's affiliated physician organizations and was measured as a continuous score ranging from 0 to 1. Socioeconomic context was calculated using a market-based approach based on zip code characteristics of the practice's patients and by combining multiple measures using principal components analysis. Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates for practices' Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan patients. The implementation of a PCMH was associated with higher breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates across most market socioeconomic contexts. In multivariable models, the PCMH was associated with a higher rate of screening for breast cancer (5.4%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 9.3%), cervical cancer (4.2%; 95% CI, 1.4% to 6.9%), and colorectal cancer (7.0%; 95% CI, 3.6% to 10.5%) in the lowest socioeconomic group but nonsignificant differences in screening for breast cancer (2.6%; 95% CI, -0.1% to 5.3%) and cervical cancer (-0.5%; 95% CI, -2.7% to 1.7%) and a higher rate of colorectal cancer (4.5%; 95% CI, 1.8% to 7.3%) screening in the highest socioeconomic group. Because PCMH implementation was associated with larger increases in screening in lower socioeconomic practice settings, models suggest reduced disparities in screening rates across these contexts. For example, the model-predicted disparity in breast cancer screening rates between the highest and lowest socioeconomic contexts was 6% (77.9% vs 72.2%) among practices with no PCMH implementation and 3% (80.3% vs. 77.0%) among practices with full PCMH implementation. In our study, the PCMH model was associated with improved cancer screening rates across contexts but may be especially relevant for practices in lower socioeconomic areas.

Use of clinical preventive services in infants, children, and adolescents.

At each stage from birth to young adulthood, the use of clinical preventive services (CPSs) provides an opportunity to intervene early to improve outcomes for many costly and complex conditions and to modify important disease-defining risk factors.1 A number of important provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will provide impetus to improve the use of CPSs, in particular, the provision that such services are now covered without cost sharing.2 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has collected baseline data and reported detailed information on a select set of CPSs for children to serve as a benchmark to measure change following ACA implementation.3 The selected CPSs were identified by the CDC because they represent important public health issues for which CPSs exist, the service was underused before ACA implementation, and national data (largely parent and self-report or provider office-based surveys) were available to establish a baseline (defined as prior to 2012). Other important CPSs for children were not included in the report because of the lack of national data to track the clinical service (eg, screening for body mass index was considered, but surveillance data on screening in clinical care were not available), or the utilization of the CPS was already at high levels (eg, many infant immunizations). Not all of the CPSs included in the CDC report have a US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade A or B or a comparable evidence review process recommendation (eg, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices); but all, with the exception of dental visits and preventive services by dentists, like dental sealants, are now covered under the ACA.3

Effects of Massachusetts health reform on the use of clinical preventive services.

Expansion of health insurance coverage, and hence clinical preventive services (CPS), provides an opportunity for improvements in the health of adults. The degree to which expansion of health insurance coverage affects the use of CPS is unknown. To assess whether Massachusetts health reform was associated with changes in healthcare access and use of CPS. We used a difference-in-differences framework to examine change in healthcare access and use of CPS among working-aged adults pre-reform (2002-2005) and post-reform (2007-2010) in Massachusetts compared with change in other New England states (ONES). Population-based, cross-sectional Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. A total of 208,831 survey participants aged 18 to 64 years. Massachusetts health reform enacted in 2006. Four healthcare access measures outcomes and five CPS. The proportions of adults who had health insurance coverage, a healthcare provider, no cost barrier to healthcare, an annual routine checkup, and a colorectal cancer screening increased significantly more in Massachusetts than those in the ONES. In Massachusetts, the prevalence of cervical cancer screening in pre-reform and post-reform periods was about the same; however, the ONES had a decrease of -1.6 percentage points (95 % confidence interval [CI] -2.5, -0.7; p <0.001). As a result, the prevalence of cervical cancer screening in Massachusetts was increased relative to the ONES (1.7, 95 % CI 0.2, 3.2; p = 0.02). Cholesterol screening, influenza immunization, and breast cancer screening did not improve more in Massachusetts than in the ONES. Data are self-reported. Health reform may increase healthcare access and improve use of CPS. However, the effects of health reform on CPS use may vary by type of service and by state.

Strategic Priorities to Increase Use of Clinical Preventive Services Among Older US Adults

The objective of this project was to obtain professionals’ perceptions of system-level strategies with potential to increase use of clinical preventive services (CPS) among adults aged 50 years or older through community settings. Public health, aging services, and medical professionals participated in guided discussions and a modified Delphi process. Priority strategies, determined on the basis of a 70% or higher a priori agreement level, included enhancing community capacity; promoting the design of health information technologies to exchange data between clinical and community settings; promoting care coordination; broadening scope of practice; providing incentives to employers; and eliminating cost-sharing. Findings provide insights about preferences for system-level strategies that align with national and state initiatives to increase CPS use.

Federal Health-Care Reform: Opportunities for Obesity Prevention

Federal Health-Care Reform: Opportunities for Obesity Prevention