Use Of Basal Insulin Research Articles

Treatment Patterns and Glycaemic Control Between 2015 and 2019 in Tianjin, China: A Real-World Study of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Diabetes is associated with a high economic burden in China; therefore, strategies to prevent diabetes, improve glycaemic control, delay disease-related complications and maintain quality of life are essential. This study was conducted to evaluate trends in treatment patterns and glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in real-world clinical practice in Tianjin, China. This retrospective, cross-sectional, multicentre study analysed data from adults with T2D living in Tianjin, China between 2015 and 2019, based on information obtained from a regional electronic medical record database. Temporal trends in treatment patterns and glycaemic control were assessed using linear regression (continuous variables), and Cochran-Armitage (two categories) or Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (≥ 3 categories) tests. Between 2015 and 2019, data from 312,203 individuals treated at 75 hospitals were included. Over this period, there was an upward trend in the prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, obesity, cardiovascular disease, stroke and retinopathy each year (all P < 0.001). The use of metformin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors increased, while thiazolidinedione, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor and glinide use decreased; the use of basal insulin (BI), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), GLP-1 RAs + BI, bolus insulin and BI + bolus insulin increased, whereas the use of premixed insulin showed a downward trend (all P < 0.001). From 2015 to 2019, an increased proportion of individuals achieved glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7% (< 53 mmol/mol; 28.1-33.7%), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 7 mmol/l (21.7-26.9%) and postprandial glucose (PPG) < 10 mmol/l (22.0-48.2%; all P < 0.001). There was no change in the proportion of individuals with an FPG ≥ 7 mmol/l and a PPG ≥ 10 mmol/l, while the prevalence of residual hyperglycaemia increased (P < 0.001). Glycaemic control improved between 2015 and 2019 in people with T2D in Tianjin, China; however, there is an unmet need for more effective glycaemic control.

6680 GLP-1 Agonists in Type 1 Diabetes - Indications and Use

Abstract Disclosure: P. Panjawatanan: None. N. Radovanovic: None. R.J. Comi: None. Introduction: Insulin therapy is the mainstream treatment in patients with Type 1 diabetes. The use of insulin, though mimicking normal physiology, is associated with weight gain. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists are a class of antidiabetic medication that lowers blood sugar levels and helps promote weight loss. We propose that GLP-1 agonists can reverse the trend of weight gain and help lower hemoglobin A1C (A1C) levels in patients with Type 1 diabetes who were gaining weight. Method: A retrospective chart review was performed at a single institution’s endocrine practice over five years. Patients with Type 1 diabetes with concomitant GLP-1 agonists used for at least one year were included. Observed outcomes were the change in A1C, weight, and basal insulin use compared at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using mixed models repeated measures. The result was reported as estimated means (95%CI). Statistical significance was determined by a p-value less than 0.05. Results: There were 49 patients included in the study. The mean age was 44.7 years old. There were 32 females (65.3%) and 17 males (34.7%). The mean duration of diabetes was 24.6 years. Thirty-five patients (71.4%) used insulin pumps, and fourteen (28.6%) were on multiple daily injections. Overall, patients had been gaining an average of 2.0 kg per year. After the treatment with GLP-1 agonists, weight was significantly reduced at 12 months (90.0 kg (95%CI 84.9-95.1), p&amp;lt;0.001) compared to baseline (97.6 kg (95%CI 92.7-102.5)). The A1C was significantly improved at 12 months (7.6% (95%CI 7.2-7.9), p&amp;lt;0.001) compared to the baseline (8.2% (95%CI 7.9-8.6)). Total daily basal dose was significantly reduced at 12 months (35.8 units (95%CI 29.8-41.9), p&amp;lt;0.001) compared to the baseline (39.2 units (95%CI 33.3-45.1)). The improvement in the parameters was more pronounced at 6 months after treatment but persisted at 12 months. Conclusion: Weight gain is a consequence of insulin usage in both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, which considerably impacts treatment outcomes and the development of comorbidities. We conclude that GLP-1 agonists are helpful to reverse the trend of weight gain and help lower A1C levels in patients with Type 1 diabetes who require life-long insulin treatment. Presentation: 6/3/2024

EVALUATION OF THE GLYCOREGULATION EFFICACY BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT WITH INSULIN DEGLUDEC IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have unsatisfactory glycoregulation with concurrent use of basal insulin and oral hypoglycemics, should be switched to a more intensive therapy regime. To evaluate the efficacy of newly available insulin degludec 70/insulin aspart 30 (IDegAsp), we retrospectively analyzed glycoregulation in 131 patients with T2DM treated with this insulin. All 131 patients were with unsatisfactory glycoregulations, and were switched to IDegAsp from other insulins (except basal-bolus insulin regimen). After a mean period of 11.75±5 months of the treatment with IDegAsp, we found statistically significant improvement in fasting and postprandial glucose levels, and HbA1c (12.5±4.4 vs. 8.8±3.9mmol/l, 13.2±4.6 vs. 9.6±4.1mmol/l, 9.7±1.8 vs. 8.1±1.6%, p&lt;0.01, respectively). The total average daily dose of insulin units (IU) was the same, and there weren’t statistically significant differences in the frequency of hypoglycaemia (p&lt;0.05). From the results, we can conclude that patients with T2DM, who switched to IDegAsp from previous antidiabetic insulin treatment (except basal-bolus insulin regimen) had improved glycaemic control without increased insulin units, and without higher risk for hypoglycemia.

Beyond HbA1c: Identifying Gaps in Glycemic Control Among Children and Young People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

To describe continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) derived glycemic variables, and study their association with HbA1c and socio-economic factors in young people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Ninety-two participants [age 15.7 ± 5.0 y (mean ± SD), HbA1c 8.0 ± 1.5% (mean ± SD)] wore a professional CGM sensor for 14 d. Median (IQR) time in range (TIR) was 41 (18)%. Participants spent 41 ± 20% of their day in hyperglycemia (>180mg/dl), and 14 (13)% in hypoglycemia (<70mg/dl). High glycemic variability (percent CV >36%) was seen in 92% participants. Older age at diagnosis was associated with higher TIR (β = 0.267, p = 0.01), lower time above range (TAR) (β = -0.352, p <0.001), but higher time below range (TBR) (β = 0.274, p = 0.006). The use of NPH vs. glargine basal insulin was associated with higher TBR (β = -0.262, p = 0.009) but lower TAR (β = 0.202, p = 0.041). HbA1c showed negative correlation with TIR (r= -0.449, p <0.001) and TBR (r= -0.466, p <0.001) and positive correlation with TAR (r = 0.580, p <0.001) and mean glucose (r = 0.589, p <0.001). These data demonstrate wide gaps between the recommended vs. real world glycemic variables in patients with T1DM in thisregionon multiple daily insulin injections. CGM identifies glycemic variability and complements HbA1c in improving glycemic control.

Age disparities in glucose-lowering treatment for Danish people with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study between 2019 and 2020

The pharmacotherapeutic guidelines for type 2 diabetes have changed considerably during the past decades. SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists have emerged as first-line agents by preventing cardiovascular events within a few years of treatment. In contrast, sulphonylureas and insulin have been deprioritised due to less beneficial effects and the risk of hypoglycaemia-particularly in older people who are frail. We hypothesised that medications with a high risk of hypoglycaemia were used more often in older people compared with younger people. In a nationwide cohort of people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark from 2019 to 2020, we described the use of specific glucose-lowering medications in relation to age and glycated haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) by descriptive statistics and regression models adjusted for sex, socioeconomic factors, renal function, and several comorbidities. Among 290 890 people with type 2 diabetes, glucose-lowering medication usage peaked at age 70 years. Increasing age was associated with relatively less use of metformin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors and more use of basal insulin, DDP-4 inhibitors, and sulphonylureas. When comparing 80-year-olds with 60-year-olds at similar HbA1c levels of 6·5% (48 mmol/mol), 80-year-olds used 8% (95% CI 7-10%) fewer glucose-lowering medications, were 55% less likely to receive GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors (relative ratio 0·45, 95% CI 0·42-0·48), and 65% more likely to receive sulphonylureas (1·65, 1·54-1·76). Among 23 032 individuals aged 80 years or older with HbA1c levels of less than 6·5% (<48 mmol/mol), 2291 (10%) used sulphonylureas or insulin. In Danish people with type 2 diabetes, the likelihood of using glucose-lowering medications with a high risk of hypoglycaemia (eg, sulphonylureas and basal insulin) increased with age, whereas the likelihood of using GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors decreased. Some people aged 80 years or older with an HbA1c level of less than 6·5% (48 mmol/mol) were potentially overtreated with sulphonylureas or insulin. These findings emphasise the importance of frequently re-evaluating glucose-lowering treatments. None. For the Danish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Children and Adolescents With Hybrid Diabetes: A Management Conundrum

ObjectiveHybrid diabetes (HD); ie, insulin resistance with positive diabetes-associated autoantibodies (DAAs) is increasing in children. We aimed to compare the characteristics of children with HD with those with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at diagnosis and after 2 years. MethodsA retrospective review of patients aged 0 to 19 years, with C-peptide and 4 DAA measurements available, who were diangosed with new-onset diabetes from 2016 to 2020 were included in the analysis. ResultsOverall, 102 subjects were included, 32 with T1DM, 21 with HD, and 49 with T2DM. Amongst the groups (T1DM vs HD vs T2DM), there were differences in the proportion of non-Hispanic Whites (81.3% vs 47.6% vs 16.4%, P < .001), frequency of family history of T2DM (37.5% vs 100% vs 85.4%, P < .001), acanthosis nigricans (0% vs 42.9% vs 93.9%, P <.001), median body mass index z-score (−0.55 vs 1.8 vs 2.4, P <.001), and median C-peptide (0.4 ng/mL vs 0.9 ng/mL vs 2.4 ng/mL, P <.001). At 2 years, differences were seen in median body mass index z-scores (0.3 vs 1.9 vs 2.3, P <.001), mean HDL-cholesterol (58.0 mg/dL vs 48.2 mg/dL vs 39.5 mg/dL, P <.001), and the use of basal insulin (100% vs 100% vs 74.4%, P <.001). ConclusionPhenotypic and metabolic differences were seen in youth with T1DM, HD, and T2DM at diagnosis and follow-up. At 2 years, all subjects with HD remained insulin dependent whereas some with T2DM were not, indicating the need for targeted interventions to address the etiopathogenesis.

Potential preventive properties of GLP-1 receptor agonists against prostate cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been suggested to possess antineoplastic properties against prostate cancer. We examined the association between GLP-1RA use and prostate cancer risk in a real-world setting. We performed a nationwide register-based cohort study using an active-comparator, new-user design. We included all men in Denmark aged ≥50 years who commenced use of GLP-1RAs or basal insulin during 2007-2019. HRs and 95% CIs for incident prostate cancer were estimated using multivariable Cox regression in 'intention-to-treat' (ITT)- and 'per-protocol'-like analyses. Among 14,206 initiators of GLP-1RAs and 21,756 initiators of basal insulin, we identified 697 patients with prostate cancer during a mean follow-up period ofabout 5 years from initiation of the study drugs. In comparison with basal insulin use, GLP-1RA use was associated with an adjusted HR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.73, 1.14) in the 'ITT' analysis and 0.80 (95% CI 0.64, 1.01) in the 'per-protocol' analysis. Stronger inverse associations were seen among older men (≥70 years) ('ITT' HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38, 0.82; 'per-protocol' HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30, 0.74), and in patients with CVD ('ITT' HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.53, 1.06; 'per-protocol' HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39, 0.91). GLP-1RA use was inversely associated with prostate cancer risk compared with use of basal insulin in the 'per-protocol' analysis. Older men and patients with CVD exhibited stronger inverse associations in both the 'ITT' and 'per-protocol' analyses. Our results may indicate that GLP-1RA use could protect against prostate cancer.

Control hospitalario de la diabetes y de la hiperglucemia: una auditoría en hospitales españoles

ObjectivesEvaluation of the quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to hospitals in Spain. MethodsCross-sectional study in one day that included 1193 (26.7%) patients with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycemia out of 4468 patients admitted to the internal medicine departments of 53 hospitals in Spain. We collected demographic data, adequacy of capillary glycemic monitoring, treatment administered during admission, and recommended therapy at discharge. ResultsThe median age of the patients was 80 years (74-87), of which 561 (47%) were women, with a Charlson index of 4 points (2-6), and 742 (65%) were fragile. Median blood glucose on admission was 155mg/dL (119-213). On the third day, the number of capillary blood glucose levels in target (80-180mg/dL) was pre-breakfast 792/1126 (70.3%), pre-lunch 601/1083 (55.4%), pre-dinner 591/1073 (55.0%) and night 317/529 (59.9%). A total of 35 patients (0.9%) were suffering from hypoglycemia. Treatment during hospitalization was performed with sliding scale insulin in 352 (40.5%) patients, with basal insulin and rapid insulin analogs in 434 (50%), or with diet exclusively in 101 (9.1%). A total of 735 (61.6%) patients had a recent HbA1c value. At the time of discharge, the use of iSGLT2 increased significantly (30.1% vs. 21.6%; p<0.001), as well as the use of basal insulin (25.3% vs. 10.1%; p<0.001). ConclusionsThere is an excessive use of insulin on a sliding scale as well as deficient information on HbA1c values and an even deficient prescription at the discharge of treatments with cardiovascular benefit.

558-P: Online Medical Education Advances Physicians’ Knowledge and Competence for the Use of Basal Insulin

Background and aims: Despite various alternative treatment options basal insulin continues to play an important role in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The goal of this activity for primary care physicians (PCP) and diabetologists/endocrinologists (D/E) was to improve their understanding of the continued role of basal insulin in the management of T2D, address barriers to its initiation, and increase the awareness of novel once-weekly basal insulin formulations. Materials and methods: Two diabetes experts joined a 24-min online video discussion with synchronized slides. Educational effect was assessed using a repeated-pair design with pre-/post-assessment. 3 multiple choice questions assessed knowledge/competence, 1 question rated on a Likert-type scale assessed confidence. A paired samples t-test was conducted on overall average number of correct responses and for confidence rating, a McNemar’s test was conducted at the question level (5% significance level). Cohen’s d with correction for paired samples estimated the effect size of the education on number of correct responses. Data collection from 10/25/22 to 12/13/22. Results: • PCPs (n=73) improved their knowledge regarding basal insulin therapy in the management of T2D by 69% (p&amp;lt;.001) • D/E (n=126) improved their knowledge regarding the clinical profile of emerging once-weekly basal insulin formulations by 52% (p&amp;lt;.01) and their competence related to the identification of patients with T2D as suitable candidates for future treatment with once-weekly basal insulins by 192% (p&amp;lt;.001) • 40% of PCP (P&amp;lt;.001) and 31% of D/E (P&amp;lt;.001) increased their confidence in initiating basal insulin therapy in their patients with T2D Conclusion: Participation of D/E and PCP in an online video expert discussion improved their understanding of basal insulin therapy, the profile of emerging once-weekly formulations and the identification of appropriate patients with T2D significantly. Disclosure J.Trier: None. H.S.Bajaj: Research Support; Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Anji Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Company, Ltd., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, Tricida, Inc. A.Philis-tsimikas: Advisory Panel; Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Other Relationship; Medtronic, Research Support; Novo Nordisk A/S, Lilly, Viking Therapeutics, NIH - National Institutes of Health.

84-LB: Intensification of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Therapy with Glargine 300 U/mL or IDegLira—The RESTORE-G Real-World Study

Combined use of basal insulin (BI) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) deserves consideration for the synergistic effects on glucose profile. Nevertheless, it is unclear if the addition of BI to the ongoing GLP1-RA therapy in free or fixed combination is associated with different outcomes. Aim of this RESTORE-G sub-study was to perform a propensity-score adjusted comparative effectiveness analysis of the two most innovative BIs for intensifying GLP1-RA therapy (±oral agents), i.e. Glargine 300 U/mL in free combination (Gla-300) vs. the fixed ratio combination of insulin degludec + liraglutide (IDegLira). Table shows sample sizes, patients characteristics and effectiveness results. Compared to IDegLira, Gla-300 group had older age, worse metabolic control, and higher starting BI doses. After 6 months, statistically significant larger FBG reduction and BI dose increase were found in the free vs. fixed combination group. Trends of larger HbA1c and weight reductions with the free combination were also found, without reaching the statistical significance. In conclusion, higher benefits on FBG control in free vs. fixed combination has been found in people uncontrolled on GLP-1 RA, likely due to a better titration of the components. However, inertia in insulin initiation was documented in both groups. Disclosure R. Candido: None. A. Nicolucci: Board Member; AstraZeneca, Research Support; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Sobi, Shionogi &amp; Co., Ltd., AlfaSigma, Speaker's Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly Alliance. M. Rossi: Research Support; Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Shionogi &amp; Co., Ltd., AlfaSigma. M. Larosa: None. R. Napoli: Advisory Panel; Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Speaker's Bureau; Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, MSD Life Science Foundation. Restore-g study group: n/a. Funding Sanofi

Inpatient management of diabetes and hyperglycaemia: an audit of Spanish hospitals

ObjectivesEvaluation of quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to hospitals in Spain. MethodsCross-sectional study in one day that included 1193 (26.7%) patients with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycaemia out of a total of 4468 patients admitted to the internal medicine departments of 53 hospitals in Spain. We collected demographic data, adequacy of capillary glycaemic monitoring, treatment administered during admission, and recommended therapy at discharge. ResultsThe median age of the patients was 80 years [74–87], of which 561 (47%) were women, with a Charlson index of 4 points [2–6], and 742 (65%) were fragile. Median blood glucose on admission was 155 mg/dl [119–213]. On the third day, the number of capillary blood glucose levels in target (80−180 mg/dl) at pre-breakfast was 792/1126 (70.3%), pre-lunch 601/1083 (55.4%), pre-dinner 591/1073 (55.0%), and at night 317/529 (59.9%). A total of 35 patients (0.9%) were suffering from hypoglycemia. Treatment during hospitalization was performed with sliding scale insulin in 352 (40.5%) patients, with basal insulin and rapid insulin analogues in 434 (50%), or with diet exclusively in 101 (9.1%). A total of 735 (61.6%) patients had a recent HbA1c value. At discharge, the use of SGLT2i increased significantly (30.1% vs. 21.6%; p< 0.001), as did the use of basal insulin (25.3% vs. 10.1%; p < 0.001). ConclusionsThere is an excessive use of sliding scale insulin as well as insufficient information on HbA1c values and prescription upon discharge of treatments with cardiovascular benefit.

Issues of insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes and ways to solve them

The article is a summary of personal experience and literature data from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov databases. As a result of the analysis, the main problems faced by practical endocrinologists when administering insulin therapy to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been determined. Insulin therapy remains an important component of glucose-lowering therapy in T2DM. A significant increase in the number of oral hypoglycemic agents has allowed delaying the start of insulin therapy but the treatment for T2DM without insulin is not real today. The current problems of insulin therapy are as follows: untimely start, insufficient titration of the dose of basal insulin, excessive use of basal and bolus insulins, the irrationality of the use of premixes and the basis bolus regimen of insulin therapy. There are methods to overcome each of these issues that have proven their effectiveness according to clinical trials and real clinical practice data. The combination of insulin and oral therapy plays an important role, the addition of oral hypoglycemic agents is effective at different stages of insulin therapy. One of the most promising options is the use of fixed combinations of basal insulin with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Fixed combinations can be used as initial therapy and are often the first step when changing other insulin therapy regimens. The use of fixed combinations can be an option for modification (simplification) of complex insulin therapy regimens, including the basal bolus regimen. Authors review current evidence and circumstances in which insulin can be used, consider individualized choices of alternatives and combination regimens, and offer some guidance on personalized targets and approaches to glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. In general, most of the modern problems of insulin therapy have options for successful overcome.

Real-World Patterns of Basal Insulin Use with Other Diabetes Medications Among People with Type 2 Diabetes Between 2014 and 2020.

Basal insulin's position in the type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment paradigm has undergone significant revisions since the advent of diabetes medications such as glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), which offer cardiorenal protection for people with T2D (PwT2D). This study aimed to characterize the demographic, clinical, and diabetes medication utilization patterns of PwT2D initiating basal insulin between 2014 and 2020 over the time period when these revisions were occurring. A retrospective study was conducted using the IBM® MarketScan® databases and included adults with T2D who initiated basal insulin therapy (basal insulin initiators) in 2015, 2017, or 2019. Patient characteristics, medication utilization patterns, and time to add an additional diabetes drug class were compared across years. Characteristics of users of basal insulin-GLP-1RA combination therapy (GLP-1RA-basal insulin dual users) were also compared across years. Between 2015 and 2019, initiation of basal insulin therapy remained steady, with 1.6-1.9% of PwT2D starting basal insulin in each year. GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i use increased pre- and post-basal insulin initiation (pre-basal: GLP-1RA, from 14.8% to 25.2%, p < 0.0001; SGLT-2i, from 11.4% to 20.5%, p < 0.0001; post-basal: GLP-1RA, from 16.7% to 30.5%, p < 0.0001; SGLT-2i, from 13.4% to 23.3%, p < 0.0001]). The proportion of PwT2D with underlying cardiovascular and renal diseases did not increase during this period. Among basal insulin initiators without prior GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, or bolus insulin use, time to adding on these agents decreased, with 14.0-15.6% starting bolus insulin within the first year. Among GLP-1RA-basal insulin dual initiators, the proportion of those with underlying cardiovascular disease was not higher among GLP-1RA first users. In this real-world study, insulin remained key in the T2D treatment paradigm. A growing proportion of PwT2D utilized GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is before and after initiation of basal insulin therapy. At the same time, there was no increase in the proportion of those initiating basal insulin who had cardiorenal comorbidity profiles for which treatment guidelines have recommended the use of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is.

Reclassification of type 2 diabetes to type 1 diabetes in Asturias (Spain) between 2011 and 2020

BackgroundDifferentiating between type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) can be difficult in adults. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of diagnostic reclassification from T2D to T1D, the characteristics of the patients and the impact on the management of the disease.MethodsObservational and descriptive study including patients diagnosed with T1D in Asturias (Spain) between 2011 and 2020 who had been considered as T2D for at least 12 months.ResultsA total of 205 patients were included, representing 45.3% of those diagnosed with T1D over 30 years of age. Median time of evolution as T2D was 7,8 years. The age was 59.1 ± 12.9 years. BMI was > 25 kg/m2 in 46.8% of patients. HbA1c was 9.1 ± 2.1%, 77 ± 22 mmol/mol, and 56.5% were using insulin. Pancreatic antibodies were present in 95.5%, the most frequent being GAD, 82.6%. At 6 months, basal insulin use increased from 46.9 to 86.3%, and HbA1c decreased, 9.2 ± 2.0%vs7.7 ± 1.2%, 77 ± 22vs60 ± 13 mmol/mol; p < 0.0001.ConclusionsDiagnosis as T2D in patients with T1D in adults is common. Age, BMI, insulin use and other clinical features are not definitely discriminatory. GAD is the antibody of choice in case of diagnostic suspect. Reclassification has important implications for metabolic control.

Factors Associated With Diabetes Distress Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes.

Examine factors associated with increased diabetes distress (DD) among patients with type 2 diabetes with DD assessed by Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) total and subscale scores (emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress). Cross-sectional analysis of data from veterans with persistently poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Multivariable linear regression models included baseline patient characteristics (independent variables) and DDS total and subscale scores (dependent variable). The cohort's (N = 248) mean age was 58 years (SD 8.3); 21% were female, 79% were non-White, and 5% were Hispanic/Latinx. Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 9.8%, and 37.5% had moderate to high DD. Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (β=0.41; 95% CI 0.01, 0.80), baseline HbA1c (0.07; 95% CI 0.01,0.13), and higher Personal Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) scores (0.07; 95% CI 0.05, 0.09) were associated with higher total DD. Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (0.79; 95% CI 0.25, 1.34) and higher PHQ-8 (0.05; 95% CI 0.03, 0.08) were associated with higher interpersonal-related distress. Higher HbA1c (0.15; 95% CI 0.06, 0.23) and higher PHQ-8 scores (0.10; 95% CI 0.07, 0.13) were associated with higher regimen-related distress. The use of basal insulin (0.28; 95% CI 0.001, 0.56) and higher PHQ-8 (0.02; 95% CI 0.001, 0.05) were associated with higher physician-related distress. Higher PHQ-8 (0.10; 95% CI 0.07, 0.12) was associated with higher emotional burden. Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity, depressive symptoms, uncontrolled hyperglycemia, and insulin use were associated with higher risk for DD. Future research should explore these relationships, and interventions designed to reduce diabetes distress should consider accounting for these factors.

Survey Reveals Patient and Health Care Provider Experiences and Challenges With the Use of High Doses of Basal Insulin.

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease, and its management results in a high emotional burden on patients. Eventually many patients require and can benefit from the use of insulin. This article reports results of a survey of patients and health care providers regarding their experiences of and challenges with the use of basal insulin. Health care providers can play a key role in helping people with type 2 diabetes overcome the challenges associated with the use of basal insulin, including connecting with their emotional needs and understanding the stressors associated with managing diabetes.

Profile of glucose lowering drug use in outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The use of glucose lowering agents with favorable weight profile is a growing practice in Diabetology. To characterize medication combinations in patients with type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and their effect on metabolic control. Review of medical records of 249 outpatients with T2D with a median age of 66 years, cared for at a medical network. Clinical characteristics, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), details of Diabetes treatment (types of drugs or insulin), renal function, lipids and B12 vitamin levels were registered. The median disease duration was 16 years. The most recent HbA1c was 7.4%. No patient was using sulfonylureas, 45 were using Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, 113 were using Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2i) Inhibitors, 21 used Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1ra), 158 used basal insulin and 61 on basal plus bolus insulin. The use of SGLT2i or GLP1ra was associated with a metabolic control similar to those patients not using them, while patients on rapid insulin had a significantly worse metabolic control and a tendency to greater body mass index. The use of basal insulin and rapid insulin was significantly associated with more hypoglycemia events. The use of SGLT2i and GLP1ra in patients with T2D is associated with better metabolic control than rapid insulin with less risk of hypoglycemia. The use of these therapies should be prioritized in the future.

Use of Glargine u 300 in Insulin Nieve Patients…….. Use of basal Insulin in Young Newly Detected T2DM in OPD during Covid 19 Pandemic

The New Onset Diabetes was very common finding in young obese persons who presented with very high sugars and weight loss as a prominent symptoms

Effect of the Concomitant Use of Subcutaneous Basal Insulin and Intravenous Insulin Infusion in the Treatment of Severe Hyperglycemic Patients.

BackgroundNo consensus exists regarding the early use of subcutaneous (SC) basal insulin facilitating the transition from continuous intravenous insulin infusion (CIII) to multiple SC insulin injections in patients with severe hyperglycemia other than diabetic ketoacidosis. This study evaluated the effect of early co-administration of SC basal insulin with CIII on glucose control in patients with severe hyperglycemia.MethodsPatients who received CIII for the management of severe hyperglycemia were divided into two groups: the early basal insulin group (n=86) if they received the first SC basal insulin 0.25 U/kg body weight within 24 hours of CIII initiation and ≥4 hours before discontinuation, and the delayed basal insulin group (n=79) if they were not classified as the early basal insulin group. Rebound hyperglycemia was defined as blood glucose level of >250 mg/dL in 24 hours following CIII discontinuation. Propensity score matching (PSM) methods were additionally employed for adjusting the confounding factors (n=108).ResultsThe rebound hyperglycemia incidence was significantly lower in the early basal insulin group than in the delayed basal insulin group (54.7% vs. 86.1%), despite using PSM methods (51.9%, 85.2%). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the early basal insulin group than in the delayed basal insulin group (8.5 days vs. 9.6 days, P=0.027). The hypoglycemia incidence did not differ between the groups.ConclusionEarly co-administration of basal insulin with CIII prevents rebound hyperglycemia and shorten hospital stay without increasing the hypoglycemic events in patients with severe hyperglycemia.

Effect of hyperglycaemia in combination with moxifloxacin on cardiac repolarization in male and female patients with type I diabetes

BackgroundPatients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus have been shown to be at a two to ten-fold higher risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) (Svane et al., Curr Cardiol 2020; 22:112) than the general population, but the underlying mechanism is unclear. Hyperglycaemia is a recognised cause of QTc prolongation; a state patients with type 1 diabetes are more prone to, potentially increasing their risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Understanding the QTc prolongation effect of both hyperglycaemia and the concomitant additive risk of commonly prescribed QTc-prolonging drugs such as Moxifloxacin may help to elucidate the mechanism of sudden cardiac death in this cohort. This single-blinded, placebo-controlled study investigated the extent to which hyperglycaemia prolongs the QTc in controlled conditions, and the potential additive risk of QTc-prolonging medications.Methods21 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were enrolled to a placebo-controlled crossover study at a single clinical trials unit. Patients underwent thorough QTc assessment throughout the study. A ‘hyperglycaemic clamp’ of oral and intravenous glucose was administered with a target blood glucose of > 25 mM and maintained for 2 h on day 1 and day 3, alongside placebo on day 1 and moxifloxacin on day 3. Day 2 served as a control day between the two active treatment days.Thorough QTc assessment was conducted at matched time points over 3 days, and regular blood sampling was undertaken at matched time intervals for glucose levels and moxifloxacin exposure.ResultsConcentration-effect modelling showed that acute hyperglycaemia prolonged the QTc interval in female and male volunteers with type 1 diabetes by a peak mean increase of 13 ms at 2 h. Peak mean QTc intervals after the administration of intravenous Moxifloxacin during the hyperglycaemic state were increased by a further 9 ms at 2 h, to 22 ms across the entire study population. Regression analysis suggested this additional increase was additive, not exponential.Hyperglycaemia was associated with a significantly greater mean QTc-prolonging effect in females, but the mean peak increase with the addition of moxifloxacin was the same for males and females. This apparent sex difference was likely due to the exclusive use of basal insulin in the male patients, which provided a low level of exogenous insulin during the study assessments thereby mitigating the effects of hyperglycaemia on QTc. This effect was partially overcome by Moxifloxacin administration, suggesting both hyperglycaemia and moxifloxacin prolong QTc by different mechanisms, based on subinterval analysis.ConclusionsHyperglycaemia was found to be a significant cause of QTc prolongation and the additional effect of a QTc-prolonging positive control (moxifloxacin) was found to be additive. Given the high risk of sudden cardiac death in type 1 diabetes mellitus, extra caution should be exercised when prescribing any medication in this cohort for QTc effects, and further research needs to be undertaken to elucidate the exact mechanism underlying this finding and explore the potential prescribing risk in diabetes.Trial RegistrationNCT number: NCT01984827.Graphical abstract