Use Of Adaptive Servo-ventilation Research Articles

Chronic Effects of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy on Mortality and the Urgent Rehospitalization Rate in Patients Experiencing Recurrent Admissions for Heart Failure - A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study (SAVIOR-L).

This study investigated whether the chronic use of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) reduces all-cause mortality and the rate of urgent rehospitalization in patients with heart failure (HF).Methods and Results: This multicenter prospective observational study enrolled patients hospitalized for HF in Japan between 2019 and 2020 who were treated either with or without ASV therapy. Of 845 patients, 110 (13%) received chronic ASV at hospital discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and urgent rehospitalization for HF, and was observed in 272 patients over a 1-year follow-up. Following 1:3 sequential propensity score matching, 384 patients were included in the subsequent analysis. The median time to the primary outcome was significantly shorter in the ASV than in non-ASV group (19.7 vs. 34.4 weeks; P=0.013). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the all-cause mortality event-free rate between the 2 groups. Chronic use of ASV did not impact all-cause mortality in patients experiencing recurrent admissions for HF.

Adaptive servo-ventilation for sleep-disordered breathing in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (ADVENT-HF): a multicentre, multinational, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, sleep-disordered breathing, comprising obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and central sleep apnoea (CSA), is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and sleep disruption. We hypothesised that treating sleep-disordered breathing with a peak-flow triggered adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device would improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. We conducted a multicentre, multinational, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial of peak-flow triggered ASV in patients aged 18 years or older with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%) who were stabilised on optimal medical therapy with co-existing sleep-disordered breathing (apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI] ≥15 events/h of sleep), with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessments. The trial was carried out at 49 hospitals in nine countries. Sleep-disordered breathing was stratified into predominantly OSA with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 10 or lower or predominantly CSA. Participants were randomly assigned to standard optimal treatment alone or standard optimal treatment with the addition of ASV (1:1), stratified by study site and sleep apnoea type (ie, CSA or OSA), with permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 in random order. Clinical evaluations were performed and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and New York Heart Association class were assessed at months 1, 3, and 6 following randomisation and every 6 months thereafter to a maximum of 5 years. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of the composite of all-cause mortality, first admission to hospital for a cardiovascular reason, new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, and delivery of an appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator shock. All-cause mortality was a secondary endpoint. Analysis for the primary outcome was done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01128816) and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN67500535), and the trial is complete. The first and last enrolments were Sept 22, 2010, and March 20, 2021. Enrolments terminated prematurely due to COVID-19-related restrictions. 1127 patients were screened, of whom 731 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive standard care (n=375; mean AHI 42·8 events per h of sleep [SD 20·9]) or standard care plus ASV (n=356; 43·3 events per h of sleep [20·5]). Follow-up of all patients ended at the latest on June 15, 2021, when the trial was terminated prematurely due to a recall of the ASV device due to potential disintegration of the motor sound-abatement material. Over the course of the trial, 41 (6%) of participants withdrew consent and 34 (5%) were lost to follow-up. In the ASV group, the mean AHI decreased to 2·8-3·7 events per h over the course of the trial, with associated improvements in sleep quality assessed 1 month following randomisation. Over a mean follow-up period of 3·6 years (SD 1·6), ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome (180 events in the control group vs 166 in the ASV group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·77-1·18; p=0·67) or the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality (88 deaths in the control group vs. 76 in the ASV group; 0·89, 0·66-1·21; p=0·47). For patients with OSA, the HR for all-cause mortality was 1·00 (0·68-1·46; p=0·98) and for CSA was 0·74 (0·44-1·23; p=0·25). No safety issue related to ASV use was identified. In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing, ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome or mortality but eliminated sleep-disordered breathing safely. Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Philips RS North America.

The efficacy and safety of adaptive servo-ventilation therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

It is unclear whether adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is effective. The aim of this study was to investigate the details of ASV use, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ASV in real-world HFpEF patients. We retrospectively enrolled 36 HFpEF patients at nine cardiovascular centers who initiated ASV therapy during hospitalization or on outpatient basis and were able to continue using it at home from 2012 to 2017 and survived for at least one year thereafter. The number of hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) during the 12months before and 12months after introduction of ASV at home was compared. The median number of HF hospitalizations for each patient was significantly reduced from 1 [interquartile range: 1-2] in the 12months before introduction of ASV to 0 [0-0] in the 12months after introduction of ASV (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, reduction in heart failure hospitalization was significantly greater in female patients, patients with a body mass index < 25, and those with moderate or severe tricuspid valve regurgitation. In patients with HFpEF, the number of HF hospitalizations was significantly decreased after the introduction of ASV. HFpEF patients with female sex, BMI < 25, or moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation are potential candidates who might benefit from ASV therapy.

FACE study: 2-year follow-up of adaptive servo-ventilation for sleep-disordered breathing in a chronic heart failure cohort

BackgroundSleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with worse prognosis. ObjectivesThis study evaluated the effects of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) on morbidity and mortality in a large heterogeneous population of HF patients with different etiologies/phenotypes. MethodsConsecutive HF patients with predominant central sleep apnea (± obstructive sleep apnea) indicated for ASV were included; the control group included patients who refused or stopped ASV before three months follow-up. Six homogenous clusters were determined using the latent class analysis (LCA) method. The primary endpoint was time to composite first event (all-cause death, lifesaving cardiovascular intervention, or unplanned hospitalization for worsening of chronic HF). ResultsOf 503 patients at baseline, 324 underwent 2-year follow-up. Compared to control group, 2-year primary endpoint event-free survival was significantly greater in patients in ASV group only in univariable analysis (1.67, 95% [1.12–2.49]; p = 0.01). Secondary endpoints, event-free of cardiovascular death or heart failure-related hospitalization and all-cause death or all-cause hospitalization were positively impacted by ASV (univariate and multivariable analysis). LCA identified two groups, with preserved and mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and severe hypoxia, in whom ASV increase prognosis benefit. ConclusionsPatients with HF and SDB are a highly heterogeneous group identified using LCA. Systematic deep phenotyping is essential to ensure that ASV is prescribed to those benefit from therapy, as ASV use in patients with severe hypoxic burden and those with HFpEF was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality. Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01831128.

1004 A novel use of adaptive servo ventilation for VNS-induced central sleep apnea in an adolescent with refractory epilepsy

Abstract Introduction Epilepsy is frequently encountered in the pediatric population and some patients are treated by stimulation of the vagus nerve to reduce their seizure frequency. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may induce central sleep apnea. Adaptive servo ventilation is a known treatment option for central sleep apnea in certain adult patients with heart failure and Cheyne-Stokes respiration but is infrequently utilized in the pediatric population. Report of case(s) A 17-year-old male with a history of intractable generalized epilepsy, VNS placement, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) presented to our tertiary care center for management of his sleep disordered breathing. Initial management of sleep disordered breathing included CPAP for OSA. After VNS placement, the patient began to have a high residual apnea-hypopnea index on data card download of his CPAP. Polysomnography (PSG) was performed on CPAP and CSA events were noted that correlated with VNS firing. BiPAP was titrated and was unsuccessful in treating the CSA. VNS adjustment did not impact the sleep disordered breathing. Repeat titration with adaptive servo ventilation successfully treated the OSA and CSA. In follow up, the patient is tolerating ASV with improvement in his nocturnal sleep disordered breathing events and his daytime functioning. Conclusion Central sleep apnea can be induced by vagus nerve stimulation. This unique case documents successful treatment of vagus nerve stimulation induced central sleep apnea by adaptive servo ventilation in an adolescent patient. Support (if any)

Abstract 10454: Heart Failure With Recovered Ejection Fraction is Good Therapeuticmerkmal for Adaptive-Servo Ventilation Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure

Introduction: Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) is a complex clinical entity in which biology and clinical management. Previous clinical trial showed adaptive-servo ventilation (ASV) therapy is harmful for patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), whereas we can initiate ASV for patients with HFrEF by adhering rigidly to Japanese statement about the proper use of ASV for HF. Hypothesis: It is still unclear whether ASV therapy is really harmful in patients with HFrecEF. Our aim is to estimate that ASV therapy is really harmful in patients with HFrecEF by estimating biomarkers and fatal cardiovascular events. Methods: The study group consisted of 78 patients with HF (age;70±12 years). Baseline LVEF was 27.8±8.5%. After optimal medical therapy, ASV was initiated as an additional HF treatment. After 6-month follow-up, we classified into 2 groups by result of LVEF after ASV therapy. Group A (n=20) was categorized as HFrecEF {low pre-LVEF (&lt;45%) and improved post-LVEF (≧45%)}, Group B (n=58) was categorized as HFrEF {low pre-LVEF (&lt;45%) and not improved post-LVEF (&lt;45%)}. We estimate the changes of BNP and fatal cardiovascular events after ASV therapy. Results: Before ASV therapy, BNP did not show significant difference in 2 groups {Group A: 439(149-1344) pg/ml vs. Group B: 531(265-892) pg/ml, p=0.73}. After ASV therapy, the changes of BNP showed significant differences (Figure 1A), LVEF also showed significant differences in 2 groups (Group A: 52.3±7.5% vs. Group B: 30.8±3.7%, p=0.039). The fatal cardiovascular events rate after three-year follow-up showed significant good prognosis in Group A (Figure 1B). Conclusions: Our study showed that approximately one in four patients can change from HFrEF to HFrecEF, and ASV is acceptable and effective treatment for patients with HFrecEF by contributing to low fatal cardiovascular events and improvement of BNP level.

Characterizing respiratory parameters, settings, and adherence in real-world patients using adaptive servo ventilation therapy: big data analysis.

There is minimal guidance around how to optimize inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) levels during use of adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) in clinical practice. This real-world data analysis investigated the effects of IPAP and minimum pressure support settings on respiratory parameters and adherence in ASV-treated patients. A United States-based telemonitoring database was queried for patients starting ASV between August 1, 2014 and November 30, 2019. Patients meeting the following criteria were included: United States-based patients aged ≥ 18 years; AirCurve 10 device (ResMed); and ≥ 1 session with usage of ≥ 1 hour in the first 90 days. Key outcomes were mask leak and residual apnea-hypopnea index at different IPAP settings, adherence and therapy termination rates, and respiratory parameters at different minimum pressure support settings. There were 63,996 patients included. Higher IPAP was associated with increased residual apnea-hypopnea index and mask leak but did not impact device usage per session (average > 6 h/day at all IPAP settings; 6.7 h/day at 95th percentile IPAP 25 cm H2O). There were no clinically relevant differences in respiratory rate, minute ventilation, leak, and residual apnea-hypopnea index across all possible minimum pressure support settings. Patients with a higher 95th percentile IPAP or with minimum pressure support of 3 cm H2O were most likely to remain on ASV therapy at 1 year. Our findings showed robust levels of longer-term adherence to ASV therapy in a large group of real-world patients. There were no clinically important differences in respiratory parameters across a range of pressure and pressure support settings. Future work should focus on the different phenotypes of patients using ASV therapy. Malhotra A, Benjafield AV, Cistulli PA, etal. Characterizing respiratory parameters, settings, and adherence in real-world patients using adaptive servo ventilation therapy: big data analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2355-2362.

Outcomes of deep sedation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, with adaptive servo ventilation.

BackgroundCatheter ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is an established treatment, but the effect of deep sedation on PSVT inducibility remains unclear.AimWe sought to examine PSVT inducibility and outcomes of catheter ablation under deep sedation using adaptive servo ventilation (ASV).MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for PSVT under deep sedation (Propofol + Dexmedetomidine) with use of ASV. Anesthetic depth was controlled with BIS™ monitoring, and phenylephrine was administered to prevent anesthesia‐induced hypotension. PSVT induction was attempted in all patients using extrastimuli at baseline, and after isoproterenol (ISP) infusion when necessary.ResultsPSVT was successfully induced in 145 of 147 patients, although ISP infusion was required in the majority (89%). The PSVT was atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in 77 (53%), atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) in 51 (35%), and atrial tachycardia (AT) in 17 (12%). A higher ISP dose was required for AT compared to other PSVT (AVNRT: 0.06 (IQR 0.03‐0.06) vs AVRT: 0.03 (0.02‐0.06) vs AT: 0.06 (0.03‐0.12) mg/h, P = .013). More than half (51%) of the patients developed hypotension requiring phenylephrine; these patients were older. Acute success was obtained in 99% (patients with AVNRT had endpoints with single echo on ISP in 46%). Long‐term success rate was 136 of 144 (94%) (AVNRT 96%, AVRT 92%, and AT 93%). There were no complications related to deep sedation.ConclusionsDeep sedation with use of ASV is a feasible anesthesia strategy for catheter ablation of PSVT with good long‐term outcome. PSVT remains inducible if ISP is used.

Adaptive Servo-Ventilation: A Comprehensive Descriptive Study in the Geneva Lake Area.

Background: Use of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) has been questioned in patients with central sleep apnea (CSA) and chronic heart failure (CHF). This study aims to detail the present use of ASV in clinical practice.Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentric study of patients undergoing long term (≥3 months) ASV in the Cantons of Geneva or Vaud (1,288,378 inhabitants) followed by public or private hospitals, private practitioners and/or home care providers.Results: Patients included (458) were mostly male (392; 85.6%), overweight [BMI (median, IQR): 29 kg/m2 (26; 33)], comorbid, with a median age of 71 years (59–77); 84% had been treated by CPAP before starting ASV. Indications for ASV were: emergent sleep apnea (ESA; 337; 73.6%), central sleep apnea (CSA; 108; 23.6%), obstructive sleep apnea (7; 1.5%), and overlap syndrome (6; 1.3%). Origin of CSA was cardiac (n = 30), neurological (n = 26), idiopathic (n = 28), or drug-related (n = 22). Among CSA cases, 60 (56%) patients had an echocardiography within the preceding 12 months; median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62.5% (54–65); 11 (18%) had a LVEF ≤45%. Average daily use of ASV was [mean (SD)] 368 (140) min; 13% used their device <3:30 h. Based on ventilator software, apnea-hypopnea index was normalized in 94% of subjects with data available (94% of 428).Conclusions: Use of ASV has evolved from its original indication (CSA in CHF) to a heterogeneous predominantly male, aged, comorbid, and overweight population with mainly ESA or CSA. CSA in CHF represented only 6.5% of this population. Compliance and correction of respiratory events were satisfactory.Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04054570.

Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy does not favourably alter sympatho-vagal balance in sleeping patients with systolic heart failure and central apnoeas: Preliminary data

BackgroundIn contrast to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the use of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) for treatment of central sleep apnoea (CSA) was associated with increased mortality in patients with chronic systolic heart failure (CHF). In order to characterize the interplay between sleep-disordered breathing, CHF and sympathovagal balance (SVB) this study investigated the effect of nocturnal CPAP and ASV on SVB in CSA patients with or without CHF. MethodsThirty-seven patients with ongoing positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP or ASV) for CSA (17 patients with systolic CHF - left ventricular ejection fraction <50% - and 20 patients with CSA but no CHF) underwent evaluation of SVB (spectral analysis of heart rate -HRV- and diastolic blood pressure variability) during full nocturnal polysomnography. The night was randomly split into equal parts including no treatment (NT), automatic CPAP and ASV. Data analysis was restricted to stable N2 sleep. ResultsIn patients with CSA and systolic CHF, neither automatic CPAP nor ASV showed favourable effects on parameters reflecting SVB during N2 sleep (all p > 0.05). In contrast, in subjects with CSA without CHF automatic CPAP, but not ASV, favourably altered SVB by decreasing the low frequency and increasing the high frequency component of HRV (both p = 0.03). ConclusionsEffects of various modes of positive airway pressure therapy of CSA on SVB during sleep depend on the mode of pressure support and underlying cardiac function. Automatic CPAP but not ASV favourably influences SVB in subjects without CHF, whereas both interventions leave SVB unchanged in patients with CHF.

The use and effectiveness of adaptive servo ventilation in central sleep apnea: a study of consecutive sleep clinic patients.

The use of adaptive servo ventilation to treat central sleep apnea in the clinical setting is incompletely understood and could be under-utilized. We reviewed our experience of adaptive servo ventilation use in patients with central sleep apnea. This study shows the effectiveness of adaptive servo ventilation in treating patients with central sleep apnea, irrespective of a predisposing factor, as assessed during a 4-week treatment trial. Results show that adaptive servo ventilation was effective and superior to continuous positive airway pressure in controlling central sleep apnea and improving symptoms. Only a small proportion of these patients had comorbid heart failure. Early treatment with adaptive servo ventilation may improve long-term adherence to therapy. These findings highlight the utility of adaptive servo ventilation in the management of central sleep apnea.

Nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using adaptive servo ventilation in a patient with severe respiratory dysfunction: a case report

BackgroundVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is usually performed under general anesthesia with a double-lumen tube. Recently, VATS without tracheal intubation in a patient with severe respiratory dysfunction has been reported. A case of nonintubated (also known as awake or tubeless) VATS using adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), a form of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation providing varying amounts of ventilator support, is presented. This is the first report of nonintubated VATS using ASV.Case presentationA 60-year-old woman was scheduled for VATS bullectomy for the treatment of pneumothorax. She had severe respiratory dysfunction and had been receiving ASV therapy because of type 2 respiratory failure. Thus, nonintubated VATS using ASV, epidural anesthesia, and dexmedetomidine were selected. When surgical pneumothorax was created by incision of the pleura, her respiratory status remained stable. In addition, lung collapse was easily induced at operation. The leaking bulla was easy to identify, and bullectomy was performed. During surgery, she continued spontaneous breathing and did not complain of pain or discomfort. She was transferred to the intensive care unit with ASV and discharged on postoperative day 12 with no respiratory complications.ConclusionIt is necessary to maintain a stable respiratory status, as well as adequate analgesia and sedation, during nonintubated VATS in patients with severe respiratory dysfunction. When total lung collapse is not necessary for the surgical procedure, use of ASV would be an effective strategy.

Effects of Adaptive Servoventilation Therapy for Central Sleep Apnea on Health Care Utilization and Mortality: A Population-Based Study.

Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) is the suggested treatment for many forms of central sleep apnea (CSA). We aimed to evaluate the impact of treating CSA with ASV on health care utilization. In this population-based study using the Rochester Epidemiology Project database, we identified patients over a 9-year period who were diagnosed with CSA (n = 1,237), commenced ASV therapy, and had ≥ 1 month of clinical data before and after ASV initiation. The rates of hospitalizations, emergency department visits (EDV), outpatient visits (OPV) and medications prescribed per year (mean ± standard deviation) in the 2 years pre-ASV and post-ASV initiation were compared. We found 309 patients (68.0 ± 14.6 years, 80.3% male, apnea-hypopnea index 41.6 ± 26.5 events/h, 78% with cardiovascular comorbidities, 34% with heart failure) who met inclusion criteria; 65% used ASV ≥ 4 h/night on ≥ 70% nights in their first month. The overall 2-year mortality rate was 9.4% and CSA secondary to cardiac cause was a significant risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.09-3.01, P = .02). Comparing pre-ASV and post-ASV initiation, there was no change in the rate of hospitalization (0.72 ± 1.63 versus 0.79 ± 1.44, P = .46), EDV (1.19 ± 2.18 versus 1.26 ± 2.08, P = .54), OPV (31.59 ± 112.42 versus 13.60 ± 17.36, P = .22), or number of prescribed medications (6.68 ± 2.0 versus 5.31 ± 5.86, P = .06). No differences in these outcomes emerged after accounting for adherence to ASV, CSA subtype and comorbidities via multiple regression analysis (all P > .05). Our cohort of patients with CSA was quite ill and the use of ASV was not associated with a change in health care utilization.

Beneficial effects of adaptive servo-ventilation on natriuretic peptides and diastolic function in acute heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is a ventilator algorithm able to correct breathing through anticyclic support of breathing in patients with central sleep apnea (CSA). So far, very few data exist regarding the role of ASV on acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We performed a single-center prospective, randomized, case-control study in consecutive acute HFpEF (left ventricle ejection fraction, LVEF ≥ 45%) patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB, apnea-hypopnea index, AHI > 15/h) and prevalence of CSA. We included ten consecutive patients randomized for ASV on top of standard therapy for acute heart failure (group 1) versus standard care alone (group 2). ASV therapy significantly reduced AHI and CSA. An improvement in cardiac diastolic function was seen in group 1 compared to group 2 (E/E' 17.5 to 9.6, p < 0.02 vs 18.5 to 14.5, p = 0.4). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) markedly decreased in cases, but not in controls (298 to 84pg/ml, p < 0.02 vs 280 to 120pg/ml, p = 0.06). Right ventricle (RV) function significantly improved in group 1, differently from group 2. An acute use of ASV seems effective in reducing BNP and improving diastolic and RV function in acute HFpEF patients with SDB and CSA, compared to standard treatment.

0514 Impact of Adaptive Servoventilation Therapy on Outpatient Healthcare Utilization

Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) has been shown to provide significantly better control of central sleep apnea (CSA) and may be better tolerated than other treatment modalities. Prior studies have demonstrated a reduction in healthcare utilization with treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. In this study, we evaluated the impact of ASV on outpatient healthcare utilization in patients with CSA. All cases of CSA (n=1,237) from Olmsted County, MN were identified utilizing the Rochester Epidemiology Project database. Patients with CSA commenced on ASV were selected. The rate of Emergency Room (ER) visits, outpatient (OP) visits and outpatient prescription medications per year in the 2 years before and after ASV were compared using the paired t-test. Multiple regression analyses were conducted accounting for adherence to ASV, CSA subtype and comorbidities. Manual review of charts was performed to obtain all relevant data. Those with a follow-up period of <1 month pre- and/or post-ASV were excluded. A total of 309 patients (68.0 ± 14.6 years, 80.3% male) were included. Mean body mass index was 31.7 ± 6.5 kg/m2, mean apnea-hypopnea index 41.6 ± 26.5/hour and mean central apnea index 14/hour. Treatment-emergent CSA (72.5%) was the most common subtype; 65% were fully adherent (≥4hrs/night on ≥70% nights) to treatment at 1 month and 16% partially adherent. Twenty-nine (9%) patients died during follow-up. There was no change in the rate of yearly ER visits [mean 1.19(SD=2.18) versus 1.26(SD=2.08), p=0.93], OP visits [mean 5.32(SD=47.25) versus 2.34(SD=8.72), p=0.43], or medications [mean 6.68(SD=12.0) versus 5.31(SD=5.86), p=0.70] in the 2 years before and after ASV. There was also no significant change in the rates of these outcomes pre- and post-ASV in sub-analyses accounting for adherence to ASV, CSA subtype or comorbidities (all p<0.05). Although reasonably well tolerated, the use of ASV in patients with CSA was not associated with a change in outpatient healthcare utilization, perhaps reflective of the overall ill health of this cohort. ResMed Foundation.

What Is New in Heart Failure Management in 2017? Update on ACC/AHA Heart Failure Guidelines.

The goal of this paper is to provide a summary of the new recommendations in the most recent 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. The intent is to provide the background and the supporting evidence for the recommendations and to provide practical guidance for management strategies in treatment of heart failure patients. In the 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of HF guidelines, important additions include new information on biomarkers, specifically on the topics of the diagnostic, prognostic role of natriuretic peptides in heart failure, and the role of natriuretic peptides in screening in patients high risk for HF and prevention of HF. There are important recommendations for treatment of patients with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), including the beneficial role of angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibition (ARNI) treatment in reducing outcomes including mortality, ivabradine in reducing heart failure hospitalizations in stable HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm and heart rate ≥ 70bpm despite β-blockers. In patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), though there are no studies demonstrating survival benefit, potential benefit with aldosterone antagonism in reducing HF hospitalizations is noted. In treatment of comorbidities, optimization of blood pressure control to less than 130mmHg is recommended in hypertensive patients to prevent HF or in patients with hypertension and HFrEF or HFpEF. In addition to recognition on the potential role of treatment of iron deficiency anemia to improve symptoms and functional capacity, caution against use of adaptive servo-ventilation in patients with HFrEF and central sleep apnea and against use of erythropoietin stimulating agents in patients with HFrEF is provided. There are new treatment strategies that are associated with significant improvements in mortality and other outcomes in patients with HF. Successful management of HF requires recognition of indications, contraindications, benefits, safety, and risk of these new therapies. In addition to incorporation of these new treatment strategies, it is critical to focus also on patient education, care coordination, identification of goals of care, monitoring, management of comorbidities, and individualization of therapies. New treatment modalities increase the choices for treatment and provide the opportunity to implement individualized treatment strategies for our patients.

Management of Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure.

This paper reviews treatment options for sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure. We sought to identify therapies for SDB with the best evidence for long-term use in patients with heart failure and to minimize uncertainties in clinical practice by examining frequently discussed questions: what is the role of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with heart failure? Is adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) safe in patients with heart failure? To what extent is SDB a modifiable risk factor? Consistent evidence has demonstrated that the development of SDB in patients with heart failure is a poor prognostic indicator and a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. However, despite numerous available interventions for obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea, it remains unclear what effect these therapies have on patients with heart failure. To date, all major randomized clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit with SDB therapy and one major study investigating the use of adaptive servo-ventilation demonstrated harm. Significant questions persist regarding the management of SDB in patients with heart failure. Until appropriately powered trials identify a treatment modality that increases cardiovascular survival in patients with SDB and heart failure, a patient's heart failure management should remain the priority of medical care.

Distinct Patterns of Hyperpnea During Cheyne-Stokes Respiration: Implication for Cardiac Function in Patients With Heart Failure.

In heart failure (HF), we observed two patterns of hyperpnea during Cheyne-Stokes respiration with central sleep apnea (CSR-CSA): a positive pattern where end-expiratory lung volume remains at or above functional residual capacity, and a negative pattern where it falls below functional residual capacity. We hypothesized the negative pattern is associated with worse HF. Patients with HF underwent polysomnography. During CSR-CSA, hyperpnea, apnea-hyperpnea cycle, and lung to finger circulation times (LFCT) were measured. Plasma N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed. Of 33 patients with CSR-CSA (31 men, mean age 68 years), 9 had a negative hyperpnea pattern. There was no difference in age, body mass index, and apnea-hypopnea index between groups. Patients with a negative pattern had longer hyperpnea time (39.5 ± 6.4 versus 25.8 ± 5.9 seconds, P < .01), longer cycle time (67.8 ± 15.9 versus 51.7 ± 9.9 seconds, P < .01), higher NT-proBNP concentrations (2740 [6769] versus 570 [864] pg/ml, P = .01), and worse New York Heart Association class (P = .02) than those with a positive pattern. LFCT and LVEF did not differ between groups. Patients with HF and a negative CSR-CSA pattern have evidence of worse cardiac function than those with a positive pattern. Greater positive expiratory pressure during hyperpnea is likely generated during the negative pattern and might support stroke volume in patients with worse cardiac function. A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 1227. The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com; ISRCTN67500535) and Clinical Trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01128816).

Quality of life improves in patients with chronic heart failure and Cheyne-Stokes respiration treated with adaptive servo-ventilation in a nurse-led heart failure clinic.

The aim of this study was to investigate if quality of life improved in chronic heart failure patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration treated with adaptive servo-ventilation in nurse-led heart failure clinic. Cheyne-Stokes respiration is associated with decreased quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. Adaptive servo-ventilation is introduced to treat this sleep-disordered breathing. Randomised, controlled design. Fifty-one patients (ranging from 53-84years), New York Heart Association III-IV and/or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and Cheyne-Stokes respiration were randomised to an intervention group who received adaptive servo-ventilation or a control group. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire was used to assess quality of life at randomisation and after three months. Both groups were followed in the nurse-led heart failure clinic. Adaptive servo ventilation improved quality of life-scores both in a per protocol analysis and in an intention to treat analysis. Twenty-one patients dropped out of the study, nine in the control and 12 in the intervention group. Use of adaptive servo-ventilation improved quality of life in chronic heart failure patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration. However, the drop-out rate was high. Chronic heart failure patients come regularly to the nurse-led heart failure clinic. The heart failure nurses' competency has to include knowledge of equipment to provide support and continuity of care to the patients.

Mechanisms underlying increased mortality risk in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction randomly assigned to adaptive servoventilation in the SERVE-HF study: results of a secondary multistate modelling analysis

A large randomised treatment trial (SERVE-HF) showed that treatment of central sleep apnoea with adaptive servoventilation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) increased mortality, although the analysis of the composite primary endpoint (time to first event of death from any cause, life-saving cardiovascular intervention, or unplanned hospital admission for worsening heart failure) was neutral. This secondary multistate modelling analysis of SERVE-HF data investigated associations between adaptive servoventilation and individual components of the primary endpoint to try to better understand the mechanisms underlying the observed increased mortality. In SERVE-HF, participants were randomly assigned to receive either optimum medical treatment for heart failure alone (control group), or in combination with adaptive servoventilation. We analysed individual components of the primary SERVE-HF endpoint separately in a multistate model, with and without three covariates suggested for effect modification (implantable cardioverter defibrillator at baseline, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], and proportion of Cheyne-Stokes Respiration [CSR]). The SERVE-HF study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00733343. Univariate analysis showed an increased risk of both cardiovascular death without previous hospital admission (hazard ratio [HR] 2·59, 95% CI 1·54-4·37, p<0·001) and cardiovascular death after a life-saving event (1·57, 1·01-2·44, p=0·045) in the group receiving adaptive servoventilation versus the control group. Adjusted analysis showed that the increased risk attributed to adaptive servoventilation of cardiovascular death without previous hospital admission for worsening heart failure varied with LVEF and that the risk attributed to adaptive servoventilation of hospital admission for worsening heart failure varied with LVEF and CSR. In patients with LVEF less than or equal to 30%, use of adaptive servoventilation markedly increased the risk of cardiovascular death without previous hospital admission (HR 5·21, 95% CI 2·11-12·89, p=0·026). Adaptive servoventilation is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤45%) treated for predominant central sleep apnoea. This multistate modelling analysis shows that this risk is increased for cardiovascular death in patients not previously admitted to hospital, presumably due to sudden death, and in patients with poor left ventricular function. ResMed.