Use In Residential Care Facilities Research Articles

FC47: To use or not to use? Multiple perspectives on residents’ alcohol and tobacco use in residential care facilities

Objectives:Residential care facilities (RCFs) provide 24/7 care to older adults with cognitive and/or physical disabilities. RCFs aim to provide person-centred care (PCC) to enhance the quality of life (QoL) of residents. Residents are dependent on their environment to fulfil their needs and wishes, such as drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco. Although alcohol and tobacco use can be experienced as a part of QoL in the final phase of life and the motivation to quit these substances is low, it can cause severe health problems in older adults. In RCFs this may cause a dilemma between the QoL of individual residents and the health and safety problems of all residents. This study aims to explore multiple perspectives on alcohol and tobacco use within the RCF.Methods:A qualitative research design was chosen, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. A various sample was purposively selected in two organizations on two types of units (psychogeriatric units and units providing care for residents with mainly physical disabilities): residents who use alcohol and/or tobacco and those who do not. Subsequently, four of these 16 residents were invited to participate in an in-depth case study. To explore the dynamics of the social environment, both formal and informal caregivers were invited to participate.Results:Residents are satisfied with their current use and value their autonomy regarding alcohol and tobacco use. Residents acknowledge that their use could cause a nuisance to others. Multiple caregivers are involved in their use and residents experience dependency on these caregivers to smoke tobacco or drink alcohol. There was limited interaction between the residents and their (in)formal caregivers and amongst the caregivers on this topic. Moreover, caregivers tended to act from their own perspectives, based on their professional expertise, knowledge, and attitudes towards residents’ alcohol and tobacco use.Conclusion:A dilemma arises between protecting residents from the adverse (health) outcomes of alcohol and tobacco use and sustaining their QoL by optimizing their autonomy. Future research could assess how to integrate providing PCC to residents by offering choices and autonomy, while considering the addictive component of these substances, health, and safety risks for all.

Live and let live: Residents' perspectives on alcohol and tobacco (mis)use in residential care facilities.

Alcohol and tobacco use could cause health problems in older adults. Older adults who become in need of 24/7 care due to physical and/or neurological disabilities may need to move to a Residential Care Facility (RCF). RCFs aim to provide person-centred care (PCC) to enhance quality of life (QoL) of residents. This study aims to explore perspectives of residents on alcohol and tobacco use, which is essential to provide PCC. A qualitative research design was chosen, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Residents who use alcohol and/or tobacco and those who do not use these substances were purposively selected in two organisations on two types of units: psychogeriatric units and units providing care for residents with mainly physical disabilities. The results were analysed using thematic analysis. Thematic analysis resulted in five themes: Current use and self-reflection, knowledge and attitudes, addiction or habit, policies and availability, dependency versus autonomy. Residents in this study value their autonomy regarding alcohol and tobacco use. They experience dependency on their (in)formal caregivers to use these substances and acknowledge that their use could cause a nuisance to others, challenging the ability of caregivers to implement PCC. Future research could assess how to integrate providing PCC to residents by offering choices and autonomy, while considering the addictive component of these substances, health and safety risks for all. This study could help care professionals to become aware of the habits and wishes of residents regarding alcohol and tobacco use and to discuss the possibilities and limitations within RCFs.

Modelling of hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 point of care tests for routine testing in residential care homes: rapid cost-effectiveness analysis.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which at the time of writing (January 2021) was responsible for more than 2.25 million deaths worldwide and over 100,000 deaths in the UK. SARS-CoV-2 appears to be highly transmissible and could rapidly spread in residential care homes. The work undertaken aimed to estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of viral detection point-of-care tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 compared with laboratory-based tests in the setting of a hypothetical care home facility for elderly residents. The perspective was that of the NHS in 2020. The setting was a hypothetical care home facility for elderly residents. Care homes with en suite rooms and with shared facilities were modelled separately. A discrete event simulation model was constructed to model individual residents and simulate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 once it had entered the residential care facility. The numbers of COVID-19-related deaths and critical cases were recorded in addition to the number of days spent in isolation. Thirteen strategies involving different hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 tests were modelled. Recently published desirable and acceptable target product profiles for SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests and for hospital-based SARS-CoV-2 tests were modelled. Scenario analyses modelled early release from isolation based on receipt of a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result and the impact of vaccination. Incremental analyses were undertaken using both incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and net monetary benefits. Cost-effectiveness results depended on the proportion of residential care facilities penetrated by SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests with desirable target product profiles appear to have high net monetary benefit values. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests with acceptable target product profiles had low net monetary benefit values because of unnecessary isolations. The benefit of allowing early release from isolation depended on whether or not the facility had en suite rooms. The greater the assumed efficacy of vaccination, the lower the net monetary benefit values associated with SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests, when assuming that a vaccine lowers the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2. There is considerable uncertainty in the values for key parameters within the model, although calibration was undertaken in an attempt to mitigate this. Some degree of Monte Carlo sampling error persists because of the timelines of the project. The example care home simulated will also not match those of decision-makers deciding on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of introducing SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests. Given these limitations, the results should be taken as indicative rather than definitive, particularly the cost-effectiveness results when the relative cost per SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test is uncertain. SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests have considerable potential for benefit for use in residential care facilities, but whether or not this materialises depends on the diagnostic accuracy and costs of forthcoming SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests. More accurate results would be obtained when there is more certainty on the diagnostic accuracy of and the reduction in time to test result associated with SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests when used in the context of residential care facilities, the proportion of care home penetrated by SARS-CoV-2 and the levels of immunity once vaccination is administered. These parameters are currently uncertain. This report was commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme as project number 132154. This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 39. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Electronic Information Systems Use in Residential Care Facilities: The Differential Effect of Ownership Status and Chain Affiliation.

The use of electronic information systems (EISs) including electronic health records continues to increase in all sectors of the health care industry. Research shows that EISs may be useful for improving care delivery and decreasing medical errors. The purpose of this project is twofold: First, we describe the prevalence of EIS use among residential care facilities (RCFs), and second, we explore utilization differences by ownership status and chain affiliation. We anticipate that RCFs that are non-profit and non-chain will use more EIS than other categories of RCFs. Data for this project come from the 2010 National Survey of Residential Care Facilities. The sample consists of 2,300 facilities. Overall use of EIS was greatest among RCFs that are non-profit and chain-affiliated. Conversely, the use was lowest among for-profit RCFs that were also non-chain affiliated. This may suggest that these facilities lack the necessary resources or motivation to invest in information systems.

The Oral Health Assessment Tool — Validity and reliability

The Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) was a component of the Best Practice Oral Health Model for Australian Residential Care study. The OHAT provided institutional carers with a simple, eight category screening tool to assess residents' oral health, including those with dementia. This analysis presents OHAT reliability and validity results. A convenience sample of 21 residential care facilities (RCFs) in urban and rural Victoria, NSW and South Australia used the OHAT at baseline, three-months and six-months to assess intra- and inter-carer reliability and concurrent validity. Four hundred and fifty five residents completed all study phases. Intra-carer reliability for OHAT categories: percent agreement ranged from 74.4 per cent for oral cleanliness, to 93.9 per cent for dental pain; Kappa statistics were in moderate range (0.51-0.60) for lips, saliva, oral cleanliness, and for all other categories in range of 0.61-0.80 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.05). Inter-carer reliability for OHAT categories: percent agreement ranged from 72.6 per cent for oral cleanliness to 92.6 per cent for dental pain; Kappa statistics were in moderate range (0.48-0.60) for lips, tongue, gums, saliva, oral cleanliness, and for all other categories in range of 0.61-0.80 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients for OHAT total scores were 0.78 for intra-carer and 0.74 for inter-carer reliability. Validity analyses of the OHAT categories and examination findings showed complete agreement for the lips category, with the natural teeth, dentures, and tongue categories having high significant correlations and percent agreements. The gums category had significant moderate correlation and percent agreement. Non-significant and low correlations and percent agreements were evident for the saliva, oral cleanliness and dental pain categories. The Oral Health Assessment Tool was evaluated as being a reliable and valid screening assessment tool for use in residential care facilities, including those with cognitively impaired residents.

Medication use in residential care facilities for the elderly.

To describe medication use by residents of residential care facilities for the elderly (RCFEs). A cross-sectional survey of medication use. Licensed, private RCFEs recruited from a roster of all licensed RCFEs in the Los Angeles area. Residents who were > or =60 years of age and whose medications were centrally stored in the facility. Age, gender, race, health insurance coverage, dietary restrictions, ambulation status, medical diagnoses, and medication profile. A total of 818 residents were surveyed. Residents were primarily white women who were >80 years. The average number of medications per resident was five; 94% of the sample took at least one medication. Cardiovascular drugs, central nervous system drugs, analgesics, diuretics, and potassium supplements were most commonly used. Use of multiple drugs within a therapeutic class was also common, with means ranging from 1.46 to 1.81 per resident for the most commonly prescribed classes. Diagnoses supporting the use of many medications were not documented in the residents' health records. This RCFE sample was medically frail and took many medications. The frequent use of cardiovascular medication reflected the prevalence of cardiac disease in the elderly. The frequency of psychotropic drug use without a corresponding indication suggested prescribing for symptoms rather than documented medical conditions. Lack of recorded diagnoses limited the ability to evaluate drug therapy. Improved record keeping; periodic medication review; and resident, staff, and prescriber education are necessary to ensure appropriate medication use in this setting.

Exploratory study of medication use in residential-care facilities in San Francisco

Journal Article Exploratory study of medication use in residential-care facilities in San Francisco Get access Donna J. Schroeder, Pharm. D., Donna J. Schroeder, Pharm. D. Hospital Pharamacy Asministration Resident Department of Pharamaceutical Services University of California San Franciso Medical Center (UCFMC) and Division of Clinical Pharamacy, School of Pharamacy, university of Califorina-San Franciso(UCSF) Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Gary McCart, Pharm. D. Gary McCart, Pharm. D. Clinical Professor Division of Clinical Pharamacy School of Pharamcy, UCSF, and Associate Director, Department of Pharamacy, UCSF, and Associate Director Department of Pharamaceutical Services, UCSFMC Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Volume 49, Issue 6, 1 June 1992, Pages 1485–1487, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/49.6.1485 Published: 01 June 1992