US Transplant Centers Research Articles

Representativeness of Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) trial participants

Underrepresentation by race and ethnicity in oncology clinical trials, including hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), is a known challenge. This analysis studied accrual on Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) trials conducted in 2014-20 by race/ethnicity, age, and sex comparing these characteristics with those of potentially eligible patients identified from SEER and CIBMTR databases for the disease, age, and years of interest of BMT CTN studies. Five BMT CTN trials met inclusion criteria, including one autologous and four allogeneic HCT trials. Two studies focused on multiple myeloma (BMT CTN 1302 and 1401), two studies on graft versus host disease (GVHD) treatment (BMT CTN 1301 and 1501), and one study on post-HCT maintenance therapy in FLT3+ acute myelogenous leukemia (BMT CTN 1506). A decline in the proportion of patients from minority racial and ethnic groups was seen from the SEER population to trial enrollees, with the largest drop seen between the SEER population and all patients transplanted (on or off trial) in US transplant centers. Allogeneic HCT trials which allowed alternate donor graft sources had less decrease from the SEER population. No decrease was seen in clinical trial enrollment with respect to older age and female HCT recipients. This study provides insights into the underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority patients in BMT CTN clinical trials, largely due to lack of access to HCT in general. Pathways expanding access to donors and improving the outreach of HCT programs to underserved populations are needed to improve access to clinical trials.

Influence of induction therapy and antiretroviral regimen on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients living with human immunodeficiency.

Kidney transplantation has a survival benefit for people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and end-stage kidney disease, however increased rates of rejection remain an issue. Questions remain regarding the impact of induction immunosuppression therapy and antiretroviral (ARV) choice on long-term outcomes. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of outcomes in recipients with HIV who received kidneys from donors without HIV transplanted between 2004 and 2019. The association between induction and ARV regimens and long-term outcomes including rejection, graft, and recipient survival over 5 years was investigated using Cox regression modeling. Seventy-eight kidney transplants (KT) performed in 77 recipients at five US transplant centers were included, with median follow up of 7.1 (4.3-10.7) years. Overall recipient and graft survival were 83% and 67%, respectively. Rejection occurred in 37% (29/78). Recipients with rejection were more likely to be younger, recipients of deceased donor organs, and Black. Receipt of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction without protease-inhibitor (PI)-based ARVs was associated with 83% lower risk of rejection (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.17 (95% CI 0.05-0.63), p =.007) and a non-statistically significantly lower risk of graft failure (aHR 0.18 (0.03-1.16), p =.07) when compared to those who received other induction and ARV combinations. In this multicenter retrospective study, we found a trend toward lower rejection and improved graft survival among those who received both rATG for induction and PI-sparing ARVs.

US Liver Transplant Outcomes After Normothermic Regional Perfusion vs Standard Super Rapid Recovery

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is an emerging recovery modality for transplantable allografts from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors. In the US, only 11.4% of liver recipients who are transplanted from a deceased donor receive a cDCD liver. NRP has the potential to safely expand the US donor pool with improved transplant outcomes as compared with standard super rapid recovery (SRR). To assess outcomes of US liver transplants using controlled donation after circulatory death livers recovered with normothermic regional perfusion vs standard super rapid recovery. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing liver transplant outcomes from cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR. Outcomes of cDCD liver transplant from January 2017 to May 2023 were collated from 17 US transplant centers and included livers recovered by SRR and NRP (thoracoabdominal NRP [TA-NRP] and abdominal NRP [A-NRP]). Seven transplant centers used NRP, allowing for liver allografts to be transplanted at 17 centers; 10 centers imported livers recovered via NRP from other centers. cDCD livers were recovered by either NRP or SRR. The primary outcome was ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Secondary end points included primary nonfunction (PNF), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary anastomotic strictures, posttransplant length of stay (LOS), and patient and graft survival. A total of 242 cDCD livers were included in this study: 136 recovered by SRR and 106 recovered by NRP (TA-NRP, 79 and A-NRP, 27). Median (IQR) NRP and SRR donor age was 30.5 (22-44) years and 36 (27-49) years, respectively. Median (IQR) posttransplant LOS was significantly shorter in the NRP cohort (7 [5-11] days vs 10 [7-16] days; P < .001). PNF occurred only in the SRR allografts group (n = 2). EAD was more common in the SRR cohort (123 of 136 [56.1%] vs 77 of 106 [36.4%]; P = .007). Biliary anastomotic strictures were increased 2.8-fold in SRR recipients (7 of 105 [6.7%] vs 30 of 134 [22.4%]; P = .001). Only SRR recipients had IC (0 vs 12 of 133 [9.0%]; P = .002); IC-free survival by Kaplan-Meier was significantly improved in NRP recipients. Patient and graft survival were comparable between cohorts. There was comparable patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients of cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR, with reduced rates of IC, biliary complications, and EAD in NRP recipients. The feasibility of A-NRP and TA-NRP implementation across multiple US transplant centers supports increasing adoption of NRP to improve organ use, access to transplant, and risk of wait-list mortality.

“Pre-Histologic” Antibody-Mediated Rejection Detected by Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA and a Novel Tissue Gene Expression Assay: A Case Report

Despite its well-characterized association with poor long-term graft outcomes, subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in recipients of kidney transplants continues to pose a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Specifically, its detection currently relies on invasive histologic surveillance, a relatively uncommon practice among US transplant centers. We describe a subclinical, "pre-histologic" antibody-mediated rejection identified and characterized by a combination of novel molecular tools, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), and molecular histology. A 67-year-old kidney transplant recipient was found to have a marked elevation of dd-cfDNA on routine testing at 3 months post-transplant; other laboratory parameters were stable. A biopsy was performed, demonstrating the absence of rejection by traditional histology, but evidence of rejection was seen when tissue was evaluated using a research use molecular histology assay. Four months later, in the setting of persistently elevated dd-cfDNA, the patient developed graft dysfunction and was found to have C4d-negative ABMR, which was treated with improvement in both graft function and dd-cfDNA. This case highlighted the complementary use of dd-cfDNA and molecular histology to aid in the early detection and characterization of graft injury. Hybrid approaches combining these tools may allow more expeditious therapeutic intervention, leading to improved graft and patient outcomes.

Racial Equity in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Centers, 2008-2018

It is unclear whether center-level factors are associated with racial equity in living donor kidney transplant (LDKT). To evaluate center-level factors and racial equity in LDKT during an 11-year time period. A retrospective cohort longitudinal study was completed in February 2023, of US transplant centers with at least 12 annual LDKTs from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, identified in the Health Resources Services Administration database and linked to the US Renal Data System and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Observed and model-based estimated Black-White mean LDKT rate ratios (RRs), where an RR of 1 indicates racial equity and values less than 1 indicate a lower rate of LDKT of Black patients compared with White patients. Estimated yearly best-case center-specific LDKT RRs between Black and White individuals, where modifiable center characteristics were set to values that would facilitate access to LDKT. The final cohorts of patients included 394 625 waitlisted adults, of whom 33.1% were Black and 66.9% were White, and 57 222 adult LDKT recipients, of whom 14.1% were Black and 85.9% were White. Among 89 transplant centers, estimated yearly center-level RRs between Black and White individuals accounting for center and population characteristics ranged from 0.0557 in 2008 to 0.771 in 2018. The yearly median RRs ranged from 0.216 in 2016 to 0.285 in 2010. Model-based estimations for the hypothetical best-case scenario resulted in little change in the minimum RR (from 0.0557 to 0.0549), but a greater positive shift in the maximum RR from 0.771 to 0.895. Relative to the observed 582 LDKT in Black patients and 3837 in White patients, the 2018 hypothetical model estimated an increase of 423 (a 72.7% increase) LDKTs for Black patients and of 1838 (a 47.9% increase) LDKTs for White patients. In this cohort study of patients with kidney failure, no substantial improvement occurred over time either in the observed or the covariate-adjusted estimated RRs. Under the best-case hypothetical estimations, modifying centers' participation in the paired exchange and voucher programs and increased access to public insurance may contribute to improved racial equity in LDKT. Additional work is needed to identify center-level and program-specific strategies to improve racial equity in access to LDKT.

The Determinants and Consequences of Living Donor Discussion Direction.

Introduction: Living donor discussions in which kidney transplant candidates discuss living kidney donation with their social network are an important step in the living donor kidney transplant process. No prior research has investigated whether who initiates discussion or influences evaluation agreement rates or how these processes may contribute to disparities. Research Questions: This study aimed to determine how common candidate- and potential-donor-initiated discussions were, at what rate each discussion type resulted in agreement to be evaluated for living donation, and what sociodemographic characteristics predicted living donor discussion and agreements. Design: A 2015 cross-sectional survey at a single, large Southeastern US transplant center measured kidney transplant candidates' social networks, including whether they had a donor discussion, who initiated it, and whether the discussion resulted in the donor evaluation agreement. Candidate-network member pairs' probability of having a candidate-initiated discussion, potential-living donor-initiated discussion, or no discussions were compared in multinomial logistic regression, and the probability of the discussion resulted in evaluation agreement was evaluated in multinomial logistic regression. Results: Sixty-six kidney transplant candidates reported on 1421 social network members. Most (80%) candidate/network-member pairs did not have a living donor discussion, with candidate-initiated discussions (11%) slightly more common than potential-donor-initiated discussions (10%). Evaluation agreement was much more common for potential-donor-initiated (72%) than for candidate-initiated discussions (39%). Potential-donor-initiated discussions were more common for White candidates (16%) than for Black candidates (7%). Conclusion: Potential-donor-initiated discussions resulted in evaluation agreement much more frequently than candidate-initiated discussions. This dynamic may contribute to racial living donation disparities.

Efficacy of Brentuximab Vedotin Maintenance Therapy Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma with and without Pre-Transplant Exposure to Novel Agents

Background: Maintenance therapy with brentuximab vedotin (BV) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improved progression-free survival (PFS) among high-risk patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in the phase III AETHERA trial. However, cHL treatment has changed significantly since that trial with frequent incorporation of BV and PD-1 inhibitors into earlier lines of therapy. The efficacy of BV maintenance may be different among pts who receive novel agents before ASCT. Methods: Pts with a diagnosis of R/R cHL who underwent ASCT between 2010 and 2022 were identified at 5 US transplant centers. Pts receiving no systemic post-ASCT maintenance or BV maintenance were included, while pts receiving investigational maintenance treatments were excluded. Medical records were reviewed to identify clinical variables. Results: 921 pts were identified. Median age was 32 yrs (IQR 24-44). 641 pts (70%) had primary refractory disease or relapsed within 12 months of frontline therapy, 326 (35%) had extranodal disease at relapse, and 173 (19%) had B symptoms at relapse. Pts received a median of 2 (1-9) lines of therapy before ASCT, including 295 (32%) who received ≥3 lines. 425 (46%) pts received BV before ASCT (including 24 pts as part of frontline treatment). 70 pts (8%) were BV-refractory (defined as failure to achieve an objective response to any BV-based treatment). 169 (18%) received a PD-1 agent with salvage treatment. 638 pts (69%) had a complete response on pre-ASCT positron emission tomography (PET). BEAM (71%) or CBV (21%) conditioning were used for most pts and 236 pts (26%) received peri-ASCT radiation. 224 pts (24%) received post-ASCT BV maintenance (including 37% of pts undergoing ASCT from 2015-2022). Compared to pts receiving no maintenance, pts receiving BV maintenance were more likely to have primary refractory/early relapsed disease (79% vs 67%, p&amp;lt;0.001), have received only 1 salvage regimen (79% vs 65%, p=0.001), and received BEAM conditioning (83% vs 67%, p&amp;lt;0.001). BV maintenance pts were less likely to receive peri-ASCT radiation (20% vs 28%, p=0.022). The median number of BV maintenance cycles was 10 (1-18) and the most common reason for discontinuation was neuropathy. Median post-ASCT follow-up was 4.9 yrs. 5-yr PFS and OS after ASCT were 70% (95% CI 67-74%) and 85% (83-88%), respectively. Because BV-refractory pts were much less likely to receive BV maintenance (p=0.0044) and had inferior PFS (HR 2.2, p&amp;lt;0.001) (and therefore would serve as a confounder), we excluded BV-refractory pts from additional analyses. Use of BV maintenance was associated with improved PFS (5-yr 81% vs 67%, HR 0.47 [0.33-0.69], p&amp;lt;0.001) and OS (5-yr 92% vs 83%, HR 0.38 [0.20-0.73], p=0.004). The benefit of BV maintenance depended upon pre-ASCT therapy. BV maintenance was associated with a significant improvement in PFS for pts who received no novel agents before ASCT (HR 0.41 [0.25-0.65], p&amp;lt;0.001), but not for BV-treated (HR 0.69 [0.38-1.25], p=0.22) or PD-1-treated pts (HR 0.63 [0.13-3.03], p=0.56) ( Figure). Among pts with 0-1 modified AETHERA risk factors, BV maintenance was not associated with a significant PFS benefit in any treatment subgroup (no novel agents, HR 0.50, p=0.087; BV-treated, HR 1.28, p=0.67; PD-1-treated, HR 2.97, p=0.44). For pts with 2+ modified AETHERA risk factors, BV maintenance significantly improved PFS in the no novel agent group (HR 0.35, p&amp;lt;0.001) but not in the BV-treated (HR 0.55, p=0.099) or PD-1 treated groups (HR 0.24, p=0.19). In multivariable analyses that included key variables (age, year of ASCT, conditioning regimen, peri-ASCT radiation, early relapse/primary refractory disease, B symptoms, extranodal sites, pre-ASCT PET, lines of therapy), BV maintenance was associated with a significant PFS benefit among pts who received no novel agents before ASCT (HR 0.27 [0.12-0.65], p&amp;lt;0.001), but not for pts treated with BV (HR 0.56 [0.28-1.10], p=0.091) or PD-1 blockade (HR 1.10 [0.22-5.56], p=0.91) before ASCT. Conclusions: In this large cohort, BV maintenance was associated with the clearest benefit among pts who received only chemotherapy before ASCT. We were unable to identify a significant improvement in PFS for pts receiving novel agents before ASCT (which could be due to insufficient power to detect a small benefit in this population), suggesting that if these pts benefit from BV maintenance, its impact is likely more limited.

Transition of Care of Stable Kidney Transplant Patients to Referring Nephrologists: A National Survey of US Transplant Centers

Transition of Care of Stable Kidney Transplant Patients to Referring Nephrologists: A National Survey of US Transplant Centers

Alcohol Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Alcohol-related Liver Disease: A Comparative Assessment of Relapse Prediction Models.

The selection of liver transplant (LT) candidates with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is influenced by the risk of alcohol relapse (AR), yet the ability to predict AR is limited. We evaluate psychosocial factors associated with post-LT AR and compare the performance of high-risk alcoholism risk (HRAR), sustained alcohol use post-LT (SALT), and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) scores in predicting relapse. A retrospective analysis of ALD patients undergoing LT from 2015 to 2021 at a single US transplant center was performed. Risk factors associated with post-LT AR were evaluated and test characteristics of 3 prediction models were compared. Of 219 ALD LT recipients, 23 (11%) had AR during a median study follow-up of 37.5 mo. On multivariate analysis, comorbid psychiatric illness (odds ratio 5.22) and continued alcohol use after advice from a health care provider (odds ratio 3.8) were found to be significantly associated with post-LT AR. On sensitivity analysis, SIPAT of 30 was optimal on discriminating between ALD LT recipients with and without post-LT AR. SIPAT outperformed both the HRAR and SALT scores (c-statistic 0.67 versus 0.59 and 0.62, respectively) in identifying post-LT AR. However, all scores had poor positive predictive value (<25%). AR after LT is associated with comorbid psychiatric illness and lack of heeding health care provider advice to abstain from alcohol. Although SIPAT outperformed the HRAR and SALT scores in predicting AR, all are poor predictors. The current tools to predict post-LT AR should not be used to exclude LT candidacy.

How the websites of high-volume US centers address the risks of living kidney donation.

The websites of US transplant centers may be a source of information about the renal risks of potential living kidney donors. To include only likely best practices, we surveyed websites of centers that performed at least 50 living donor kidney transplants per year. We tabulated how risks were conveyed regarding loss of eGFR at donation, the adequacy of long-term ESRD risk data, long-term donor mortality, minority donor ESRD risk, concerns about hyperfiltration injury versus the risk of end-stage kidney diseases, comparisons of ESRD risks in donors to population risks, the increased risks of younger donors, an effect of the donation itself to increase risk, quantifying risks over specific intervals, and a lengthening list of small post-donation medical risks and metabolic changes of uncertain significance. While websites had no formal obligation to address donor risks, many offered abundant information. Some conveyed OPTN-mandated requirements for counseling individual donor candidates. While actual wording often varied, there was general agreement on many issues. We occasionally noted clear-cut differences among websites in risk characterization and other outliers. The websites of the most active US centers offer insights into how transplant professionals view living kidney donor risk. Website content may merit further study.

Characterization of Transplant Center Decisions to Allocate Kidneys to Candidates With Lower Waiting List Priority

Allocation of deceased donor kidneys is meant to follow a ranked match-run list of eligible candidates, but transplant centers with a 1-to-1 relationship with their local organ procurement organization have full discretion to decline offers for higher-priority candidates and accept them for lower-ranked candidates at their center. To describe the practice and frequency of transplant centers placing deceased donor kidneys with candidates who are not the highest rank at their center according to the allocation algorithm. This retrospective cohort study used 2015 to 2019 organ offer data from US transplant centers with a 1-to-1 relationship with their local organ procurement organization, following candidates for transplant events from January 2015 to December 2019. Participants were deceased kidney donors with a single match-run and at least 1 kidney transplanted locally and adult, first-time, kidney-only transplant candidates receiving at least 1 offer for a locally transplanted deceased donor kidney. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2022 to March 28, 2023. Demographic and clinical characteristics of donors and recipients. The outcome of interest was kidney transplantation into the highest-priority candidate (defined as transplanted after zero declines for local candidates in the match-run) vs a lower-ranked candidate. This study assessed 26 579 organ offers from 3136 donors (median [IQR] age, 38 [25-51] years; 2903 [62%] men) to 4668 recipients. Transplant centers skipped their highest-ranked candidate to place kidneys further down the match-run for 3169 kidneys (68%). These kidneys went to a median (IQR) of the fourth- (third- to eighth-) ranked candidate. Higher kidney donor profile index (KDPI; higher score indicates lower quality) kidneys were less likely to go to the highest-ranked candidate, with 24% of kidneys with KDPI of at least 85% going to the top-ranked candidate vs 44% of KDPI 0% to 20% kidneys. When comparing estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) scores between the skipped candidates and the ultimate recipients, kidneys were placed with recipients with both better and worse EPTS than the skipped candidates, across all KDPI risk groups. In this cohort study of local kidney allocation at isolated transplant centers, we found that centers frequently skipped their highest-priority candidates to place kidneys further down the allocation prioritization list, often citing organ quality concerns but placing kidneys with recipients with both better and worse EPTS with nearly equal frequency. This occurred with limited transparency and highlights the opportunity to improve the matching and offer algorithm to improve allocation efficiency.

Health-related Quality of Life After Liver Transplantation-An Important Goal, but One Definition (or Size) Does Not Fit All.

Health-related Quality of Life After Liver Transplantation-An Important Goal, but One Definition (or Size) Does Not Fit All.

Increased volume of organ offers and decreased efficiency of kidney placement under circle-based kidney allocation

The newest kidney allocation policy kidney allocation system 250 (KAS250) broadened geographic distribution while increasing allocation system complexity. We studied the volume of kidney offers received by transplant centers and the efficiency of kidney placement since KAS250. We identified deceased-donor kidney offers (N = 907,848; N = 36,226 donors) to 185 US transplant centers from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021 (policy implemented March 15, 2021). Each unique donor offered to a center was considered a single offer. We compared the monthly volume of offers received by centers and the number of centers offered before the first acceptance using an interrupted time series approach (pre-/post-KAS250). Post-KAS250, transplant centers received more kidney offers (level change: 32.5 offers/center/mo, P < .001; slope change: 3.9 offers/center/mo, P = .003). The median monthly offer volume post-/pre-KAS250 was 195 (interquartile range 137-253) vs. 115 (76-151). There was no significant increase in deceased-donor transplant volume at the center level after KAS250, and center-specific changes in offer volume did not correlate with changes in transplant volume (r = −0.001). Post-KAS250, the number of centers to whom a kidney was offered before acceptance increased significantly (level change: 1.7 centers/donor, P < .001; slope change: 0.1 centers/donor/mo, P = .014). These findings demonstrate the logistical burden of broader organ sharing, and future allocation policy changes will need to balance equity in transplant access with the operational efficiency of the allocation system.

Testing the Differential Access Hypothesis That Black Kidney Transplant Candidates Perceive Social Network Access to Fewer Potential Living Donors Than White Candidates.

Many studies of Black-White disparities in living donor kidney transplantation hypothesize that they were partially due to Black-White differences in candidate social network access to healthy, willing donors. This differential access hypothesis has not been tested using directly measured social network data. Do black kidney transplant candidates have perceived lower social network access to health and/or willing living donors than white candidates? A cross-sectional survey that measured the social network members was collected in 2015. Black-White differences in patient counts of perceived healthy and/or willing potential donors in social networks, and individual network members' probability of being perceived healthy and/or willing, were compared using logistic and negative binomial regression models. The survey included 66 kidney transplant candidates reporting on 1474 social network members at a large Southeastern US transplant center in 2015. Black and White patients had similar access to perceived healthy, likely potential donors (86% vs 87% had 1 or more, P = .92; 5.91 vs 4.13 mean counts, P = .20) and perceived healthy, agreed potential donors (56% vs 48%, P = .54; 1.77 vs 1.74, P = .97). Black patients' network members were individually more likely to be perceived healthy and likely potential donors (26% vs 21%, P = .04), and White patients' network members were more likely to have agreed (13% vs 9%, P = .03), but these differences were statistically insignificant in demographically adjusted models. Black and White transplant candidates perceived access to similar numbers of potential donors in their social networks. This result does not support the differential access hypothesis.

Virtual crossmatch for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States: A survey of histocompatibility lab directors and transplant surgeons

Virtual crossmatch (VXM) is used as an alternative to or in conjunction with a cell-based physical crossmatch (PXM) for assessing HLA (human leukocyte antigen) compatibility prior to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Data on practice patterns and perceptions regarding VXM use in the US are limited. We performed a survey of US HLA directors and transplant surgeons regarding HLA testing and crossmatch strategies. 53 (56 %) HLA directors and 68 surgeons (representing ∼ 23 % of US transplant centers) completed the survey. Both groups agreed that VXM could reduce cold ischemia time (CIT), costs and improve allocation efficiency. VXM use increased following the 2021 kidney allocation change. Reducing CIT was the primary reason for favoring VXM over PXM. Preference for VXM reduced as candidates’ panel reactive antibodies increased. Regulations, program policies and limitations of HLA technology were cited as important reasons for preferring PXM over VXM. Surgeons reported similar perceptions, but findings are limited by the low response rate. Finally, half the labs reported lacking specific protocols for VXM use. In conclusion, improved HLA technology and protocols along with changes to institutional procedures and policy regulations are needed for safer expansion of VXM in DDKT.

Remote ex vivo lung perfusion at a centralized evaluation facility.

In the US, only 23% of lungs offered for transplantation are transplanted. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) allows for evaluation of additional donor lungs; its adoption has been limited by resources and expertise. Dedicated facilities with a centralized lung evaluation system (CLES) could expand access to EVLP. In this unblinded, nonrandomized, traditional feasibility study, 7 US transplant centers referred lungs declined for standard transplantation to a dedicated EVLP facility, which utilized a CLES. EVLP was remotely monitored by the transplant teams. CLES lungs were matched with contemporaneous conventional static cold-preserved controls at each center. A total of 115 recipients were enrolled, and 66 received allografts from 63 donors after EVLP at the dedicated CLES facility. Forty-nine contemporaneous patients served as controls. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours (PGD3-72 hours) was higher in the CLES group with 16 (24%) vs 2 (4%) in the control (common RD 95% CI, 0.07-0.32; p=0.0009). All recipients survived to 30 days and 1-year survival was similar for both groups (92% controls vs 89% CLES; common RD 95% CI, -0.14-0.08; p=0.58). Total preservation time, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and time to first extubation were longer in the CLES group. Remote ex vivo perfusion of lung allografts declined for conventional transplantation at a dedicated CLES facility is feasible and resulted in additional transplants. Recipients of allografts assessed with a CLES had a higher rate of PGD3-72 hours, but similar 30-day and 1-year outcomes compared to conventional lung recipients. (NCT02234128).

Potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) survivors: A BMT Survivor Study report.

Blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) is increasingly offered to older individuals with hematologic malignancies. The high prevalence of chronic health conditions in such individuals necessitates use of multiple medications. Beers Criteria represent a list of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) shown to increase the risk of health problems in the elderly. We sought to determine the prevalence and predictors of PIM use in older BMT survivors and identify associations with health problems. Study participants were drawn from the BMT Survivor Study, a cohort study of patients transplanted at three US transplant centers between 1974 and 2014 and surviving ≥2years. For this report, the survivors were aged ≥65 years. Siblings served as a comparison group. Participants self-reported sociodemographics, chronic health conditions, and medication use. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of PIM use and associations with health problems. Overall, PIM use was comparable between BMT survivors (49.4%) and siblings (49.3%) (odds ratio [OR]=0.9; 95% CI,0.7-1.2); however, BMT survivors were more likely to use >1 PIM (17.4% vs. 12.4%; OR=1.5; 95% CI,1.01-2.4) and central nervous system-related PIMs (8.3% vs. 4.3%; OR=2.18; 95% CI,1.17-4.09). Predictors of PIM use included presence of severe/life-threatening chronic health conditions (OR=1.5; 95% CI,1.1-2.0), and chronic graft versus host disease (OR=1.7; 95% CI,1.1-2.7). Survivors taking >1 PIM reported more issues with vertigo (OR=2.3; 95% CI,1.1-4.7), balance (OR=2.6; 95% CI,1.7-4.1), faintness/dizziness (OR=2.8; 95% CI,1.8-4.6), and personal care (OR=4.5; 95% CI,1.4-14.8). This study shows the health problems associated with PIM use and identifies vulnerable populations at higher risk for PIM use, providing evidence for caution in using PIMs in high-risk populations.

Diabetes-free survival among living kidney donors and non-donors with obesity: A longitudinal cohort study.

Approval of living kidney donors (LKD) with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) risk factors, such as obesity, has increased. While lifetime ESKD development data are lacking, the study of intermediate outcomes such as diabetes is critical for LKD safety. Donation-attributable diabetes risk among persons with obesity remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 10-year diabetes-free survival among LKDs and non-donors with obesity. This longitudinal cohort study identified adult, LKDs (1976-2020) from 42 US transplant centers and non-donors from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (1985-1986) and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (1987-1989) studies with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. LKDs were matched to non-donors on baseline characteristics (age, sex, race, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) plus diabetes-specific risk factors (family history of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, smoking history). Accelerated failure time models were utilized to evaluate 10-year diabetes-free survival. Among 3464 participants, 1119 (32%) were LKDs and 2345 (68%) were non-donors. After matching on baseline characteristics plus diabetes-specific risk factors, 4% (7/165) LKDs and 9% (15/165) non-donors developed diabetes (median follow-up time 8.5 (IQR: 5.6-10.0) and 9.1 (IQR: 5.9-10.0) years, respectively). While not significant, LKDs were estimated to live diabetes-free 2 times longer than non-donors (estimate 1.91; 95% CI: 0.79-4.64, p = 0.15). LKDs with obesity trended toward living longer diabetes-free than non-donors with obesity, suggesting within the decade following donation there was no increased diabetes risk among LKDs. Further work is needed to evaluate donation-attributable diabetes risk long-term.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Long-Term Survivors of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Secondary Analysis from Two Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trials of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivorship Interventions

Background: Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) recipients with Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL and NHL) who survive progression-free for ≥2years can expect a 5-year overall survival rate of 90% (Myers et al, Cancer, 2018). However, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in long-term lymphoma survivors after AHCT have not been well described. We present secondary analyses from a combined baseline dataset from two multi-center randomized clinical trials of HCT survivorship interventions, enrolling at 18 US transplant centers, including a large cohort of 1-10-year lymphoma AHCT survivors. Our objectives were to describe health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cancer and treatment-related distress (CTXD), and to examine their associations with available clinical and sociodemographic correlates. Methods: Cross-sectional data at the time of study enrollment were pooled from two trials: SCP (Survivorship Care Plan; NCT02200133) and INSPIRE (INternet Survivorship Program with Information and REsources; NCT01602211). The SCP study enrolled patients (N=456) who were in a stable remission 1-5 years after transplant and the INSPIRE study enrolled survivors (N=1177) who were 2-10 years post-transplant, between 2003-2014. This analysis was restricted to AHCT recipients with diagnosis of HL or NHL. Our objectives were to describe HRQoL and cancer related distress (CTXD), and to examine their association with available baseline correlates. HRQoL was assessed using SF-12 v2 (12-item short survey form) and described as physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) T-scores (higher scores indicated better functioning). Comparisons between SF-12 scores and age-matched population norm (mean score 50, standard deviation [SD] 10) were analyzed using paired t-tests. Distress was assessed using the CTXD instrument, which reports mean scores from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater distress. Based on prior receiver operating characteristic analysis, CTXD score >1.1 was considered clinically significant. Multivariate linear regression models were performed to evaluate the association of PCS score, MCS score, and CTXD with the following variables: diagnosis (HL vs. NHL), sex, race/ethnicity, number of HCT, use of total body irradiation (TBI) for AHCT, subsequent allogeneic transplant, age at time of enrollment, and time since AHCT. Results: Of 522 HL and NHL AHCT recipients, 60% were male, 94% were Caucasian, 94 (18%) had HL, 428 (82%) had NHL; 26 (5%) received >1 HCT, including 16 (4%) who received a subsequent allogeneic HCT. 8% patients received TBI-based conditioning regimens. Median age at index AHCT was 55 (range: 17-80) years, and median time from AHCT to study entry was 5 (range: 2-11) years. The mean [±SD] PCS T-score in the study population (48.96 [±10.59]) was slightly lower than the population norm (50 [±10]) (p=0.03). Mean [±SD] MCS T-scores were not significantly different between patients (50.75 [±10.40]) and general population (50 [±10]) (p=0.16) (Figure 1). The mean CTXD score was 0.79 (±0.59), with 135 (26%) patients reporting clinically significant distress (mean score ≥ 1.1). Among CTXD domains, "health burden” and "uncertainty” accounted for the highest burden of clinically significant distress, with 42% and 35% of patients reporting distress in these domains, respectively (Figure 2). On multivariable analysis, older age at study entry was associated with higher MCS score (estimated slope: 1.3 [95% CI: 0.5-2.2]; p=0.002), although there was no association of age with PCS score or CTXD. We did not observe associations of other variables and PCS score, MCS score, or CTXD. Conclusions: Patients with HL and NHL who are long-term disease-free survivors of AHCT have lower physical HRQoL compared to general population, although the difference is not clinically meaningful. Mental HRQoL in HL and NHL AHCT survivors is similar to general population. Older age is associated with higher mental HRQoL. Approximately a quarter of patients report clinically significant cancer and treatment-related distress. Survivorship programs should continue to screen for, and address concerns regarding HRQoL and distress. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Bridging the gap: An approach to reporting antimicrobial stewardship metrics specific to solid organ transplant recipients.

This study seeks to describe inpatient antimicrobial use (AU) utilizing the National Healthcare Safety Network-AU (NHSN-AU) framework among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) within 12 months after transplant. This cross-sectional study included SOTr ≥ 18 years of age who underwent transplantation from January 2015 to December 2016 at a Midwestern US transplant center. Inpatient AU was followed for 12 months post-transplant. Hospital days present up to 12 months post-transplant, AU variables, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurrences were analyzed. The cohort of 530 SOTr included 225 kidney (42.5%), 171 liver (32.3%), 45 lung (8.5%), 40 heart (7.5%), 39 multivisceral (7.4%), seven small bowel (1.3%), and three pancreas (0.6%) transplants. Total days of therapy (DOT) were 22 782 among the cohort, with a median of 5 days [interquartile range [IQR], 1-12]. Lung and liver transplants had the most total DOT (6571vs. 5569 days), while lungs and small bowels had the highest median DOT (13 [IQR, 2-56] vs. 12 [IQR, 2-31]). The facility-wide DOT/1000 days were lowest in pancreas and highest in lung transplants (5.3vs. 428.1). Small bowel transplants received the most resistant-Gram-positive infection and hospital-onset infection agents for facility-wide DOT/1000 days present. Pancreas and kidney transplants accounted for the most high-risk CDI agents. CDI occurred in 34 patients, with kidney and liver transplants experiencing 13 each. This study represents one of the first reports of AU in SOTr utilizing the NHSN-AU framework. More studies are needed for further peer-to-peer comparison of AU in this complex patient population.