US-guided Group Research Articles

Anestesia neuroaxial guiada por ultrasonido vs. reparos anatómicos en ancianos: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia requires palpation of surfaces in order to identify the intervertebral spaces in the lumbar spine. In elderly individuals, the procedure is more challenging due to age-related degenerative changes in the spine. Objective: To determine which technique between ultrasound (US) guidance or the use of anatomical landmarks to guide spinal anesthesia ensures a higher success rate in elderly patients. Methods: Prospective observational cohort study in patients with an indication to receive subarachnoid anesthesia, regardless of the type of surgical intervention, carried out at Hospital Universitario del Valle and Fundación Hospital San José Buga. Data were collected over a 12-month period at the time of making the puncture. The treating anesthetists were free to choose between US guidance or the use of anatomical landmarks. Results: Overall, 80 patients were assessed, including men and women over 65 years of age (mean 78.50±9.04). The number of punctures as well as needle redirections were significantly lower in the US-guided group. Additionally, in the group in which anatomical landmarks were used to guide the puncture, the marked site did not coincide with the actual puncture site confirmed with US in 37.5% of cases (p<0.001). This could result in inadequate block or complications associated with intradural puncture. Conclusions: US-guided neuroaxial anesthesia in elderly individuals could facilitate success on the first attempt.

Combined Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy versus Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term effectiveness and safety of a combined ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy (FL)-guided approach in comparison to US-guided and FL-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (CESI) for treating unilateral lower lumbar radicular pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 154 patients who underwent CESI between 2018 and 2022 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the guidance method: combined US and FL (n = 51), US-guided (n = 51), and FL-guided (n = 52). The study design was retrospective case-controlled, utilizing patient charts and standardized forms to assess clinical outcomes, adverse events, complications during the procedures. Results: In all groups, Oswestry Disability Index and Verbal Numeric Scale scores improved at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection, with no significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). The treatment success rate at all time points was also similar among the groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that injection method, cause, sex, age, number of injections, and pain duration did not independently predict treatment success. Blood was aspirated before injection in 2% (n = 1), 13.5% (n = 7), and 4% (n = 2) of patients in the combined US and FL groups, FL-guided groups, and US-guided groups, respectively. Intravascular contrast spread was detected in one patient in the combined method groups and seven in the FL-guided groups. Conclusions: When comparing pain reduction and functional improvement, there was no significant difference between the three methods. The combined method took less time compared to using FL alone. The combined approach also showed a lower occurrence of intravascular injection compared to using FL alone. Moreover, blood vessels at the injection site can be identified with an ultrasound using the combined method. Given these advantages, it might be advisable to prioritize the combined US- and FL-guided therapy when administering CESI for patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain.

Uterine Balloon Tamponade under Ultrasound Guidance in Women with Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) represents one of the principal causes of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) is recommended for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony in women who do not respond to pharmacological first-line treatment. The success of UBT in bleeding control is related to the correct positioning of the device, since incorrect insertion can be associated with ineffectiveness and requires time-consuming repositioning maneuvers, with a further increase in blood loss. The use of ultrasound (US) during UBT may increase the success rate by preventing wrong positioning. This study aims to demonstrate the role of US guidance during UBT and to assess whether US guidance can ease positioning and reduce insertion times, preventing additional repositioning maneuvers, in comparison with a US check carried out after balloon insertion. Methods: This was a retrospective study including 370 women who underwent vaginal delivery, had PPH caused by uterine atony and required UBT at Sant'Anna Hospital from 2015 to 2019. The exclusion criteria were an abnormal placental site, vaginal or cervical trauma, coagulation defects, uterine anomalies, previous postpartum hemorrhage and previous caesarean section. Included subjects were divided into two groups: the US-guided group (n = 200) underwent Bakri balloon positioning under US guidance, and the non-guided group (n = 170) received a US check only after balloon insertion. The primary outcome was the success rate of the procedure, expressed as the percentage of cases with bleeding control without the need for balloon repositioning; the secondary outcomes were the length of the procedure and some parameters related to blood loss. Results: The success rate was 99% for the US-guided group vs. 86% for the non-guided group. None of the patients required hysterectomy. In the US-guided group with respect to the non-guided group, we observed a significant reduction in blood loss (1100 ± 450 vs. 1500 ± 600 mL; p < 0.001), Δhemoglobin level (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 2.0 g/dL, p < 0.001) and time required for the procedure (8 vs. 13 min, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the use of US guidance for placement of UBT was associated with reduced need for balloon repositioning, lower blood loss, and faster resolution of postpartum hemorrhage.

The Effect of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheterization on Complications and Success Rate in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Study

Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the results of ultrasound (US) guidance and the landmark (LM) technique for central venous catheter (CVC) placement in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) as performed by clinicians. Material and Methods: The patients were divided into two groups according to the technique used: an LM group (459 patients) and a US-guided group (200 patients). We evaluated the success rate, the number of attempts, and the complication rates based on each patient’s age and weight. Results: The time required for the successful placement of the CVC was significantly different between the two groups: 10.9±10.8 min in the LM group and 8.1±7.6 min in the US-guided group (p=0.012). Additionally, the average number of attempts for successful catheterization was 1.8±0.8 in the US-guided group; and 2.5 ± 1.4 in the LM group (p=0.024). A total of 115 (17.3%) complications were noted: 24 (3.6%) in the US-guided group and 91 (13.7%) in the LM group (p=0.014). The frequency of complications decreased as the age and weight of the patients increased. When the inserted catheters used by ultrasound were evaluated, 59.5% of them were placed by clinicians who had ultrasound training while 40.5% were inserted by clinicians who did not have ultrasound training. There was no significant difference in the complication rate, number of punctures, and success rates between the ultrasound-trained and untrained clinicians (p=0.476). Conclusion: This is the largest multicenter study comparing the US-guided vs. LM technique for CVC placement in children. We believe that the US-guided CVC procedure is more safe and takes less time than the LM technique. Also, point-of-care ultrasound is useful, beneficial, and easily available for pediatric intensivists.

Ultrasound-Guided Vs Non-Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

This randomized clinical trial study aims to compare ultrasound-guided versus non-guided Dextrose 10% injections in patients suffering from internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The study population included 22 patients and 43 TMJs suffering from unilateral or bilateral TMJ painful clicking, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), refractory to or failed conservative treatment. The patients were divided randomly into two groups (non-guided and ultrasound (US)-guided groups). The procedure involved injection of 2 mL solution of a mixture of 0.75 mL 0.9% normal saline solution, 0.3 mL 2% lidocaine and 0.75 mL dextrose 10% using a 25G needle in the joint and 1 mL intramuscular injection to the masseter muscle at the most tender point. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used to compare joint pain intensity over four different periods, beginning with pre-injection, 1-, 2-, and 6-months postinjection. Twenty-two patients 5 males (n = 5/22, 22.7%) and 17 females (n = 17/22, 77.2%) were included in this study. The mean age was 27.3 ± 7.4 years (30.2 ± 7.0) for the non-guided group and 24.3 ± 6.9 for the US-guided group. The dextrose injection reduced intensity over time in both groups with statistically significant improvement (P value <.05) at 2 and 6 months in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS assessment between both groups. Intra-articular injection of dextrose 10% for patients with painful clicking and DDWR resulted in reduced pain intensity in both US-guided and non-guided groups with significant symptomatic improvement over time in both groups. US guidance allowed accurate anatomical localization and safe procedure with a single joint puncture.

Comparative outcome of ultrasound guided vs. fluoroscopy guided hydrodilatation in adhesive capsulitis: a prospective study.

The incidence of adhesive capsulitis varies from 2-5% in the general population to 20% in people with diabetes. One of the most effective treatment methods is hydrodilatation, which can be done under US-guidance or Fluoroscopic guidance. However, the clinical effectiveness of US-guided injections in comparison to fluoroscopy-guided injections is still debatable. The possibility of severe side effects, the expense, and the time required to carry out this minimally invasive procedure highlight how crucial it is for patients to have a precise intra-articular injection. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided vs. Fluoroscopic guided hydrodilatation for patients with adhesive capsulitis. Sixty-four patients were randomly selected for hydrodilatation using any one of the techniques. The patients were evaluated for clinical improvements using the visual analog scale (VAS), oxford shoulder score (OSS), and range of motion (ROM). The US-guided group experienced more pain reduction than the fluoroscopy group within the first four weeks (P < 0.001). The increase in ROM was much more significant in the US-guided group for the first 8 weeks. Improvement in Abduction and External rotation was much more significant (P < 0.001) in the first 4 weeks after hydrodilatation in the US-guided group. The improvement in ROM was maintained on long-term follow-up (mean 24 months), with 45 out of 64 (70.3%) reporting a normal or near normal ROM. On assessing the Oxford shoulder score improvements, the US-guided group's score significantly increased after the first week (P = 0.003), but the fluoroscopy-guided group's score increased after the second week. On comparison between the two groups, the amount of score improvement was more significant in the US-guided group than in the fluoroscopy-guided group in the first 4 weeks (P < 0.001). US-guided technique for intra-articular injection for patients with adhesive capsulitis provided a quicker pain reduction and a larger improvement in range of motion and overall shoulder functions.

Comparing the efficacy of blind vs. ultrasound-guided injections in Lateral Epicondylitis: A prospective analysis

Lateral epicondylitis is a relatively common non-traumatic elbow disorder. It is a painful musculoskeletal condition that usually follows forceful repetitive pronation and supination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages of ultrasound-guided injection in patients of Lateral Epicondylitis in comparison to non-image-guided blind injections. This comparative observational study was conducted on sixty patients who had clinical diagnosis of Lateral Epicondylitis. They were divided into two groups of thirty each (randomization done on odd even manner), one group underwent US-guided injections and the other group underwent the blind procedure by a specialist. Pain relief using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) {score of 0–10} was recorded before the procedure, immediately after the procedure, one-week post-procedure, and six weeks post-procedure. Demographic characteristics, chief complaints, duration of symptoms, previous treatment taken, and complications post-procedure were gathered and compared between the two groups. All patients in both groups finished the period of study. Significant improvement in pain score and tenderness was found in both groups immediately after the injection, one-week post-procedure, and after six weeks post-procedure when compared to the baseline value (p value < 0.05). The US-guided group showed a better reduction in VAS scores immediately after the procedure and one-week post-procedure as compared to patients who were given blind injections, however no statistical difference was found at six weeks follow up. This study shows that US-guided injection relatively improves elbow pain and functional activities early and more effectively than blind/non-image-guided injections, although such results fade as time passes by.

Combined Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Reduces Local Recurrence Rate

Background/Aim: In radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the therapeutic effect depends on the appropriate position of the electrode. To improve the accuracy of the electrode needle position, we currently perform RFA with combined ultrasound sonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) guidance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this US/CT-guided RFA method. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study recruited 97 patients with single tumors treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and monopolar RFA between January 2013 and December 2017. Among these, 50 patients were treated with RFA under US/CT guidance (US/CT-guided group) and 47 were treated with RFA under US guidance alone (US-guided group). We analyzed the efficacy of US/CT guidance compared with US guidance alone. Results: The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local recurrence rates for the US/CT-guided and US-guided groups were 4.1%, 6.3%, and 8.6%, and 19.6%, 31.6%, and 41.9%, respectively. The local recurrence rate was lower in the US/CT-guided group (p=0.0030). Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis demonstrated that the independent risk factors associated with local recurrence were tumor size (p=0.0028) and US/CT guidance (p=0.0037). Conclusion: US/CT-guided RFA for HCC reduced the local recurrence rate compared with US-guided RFA alone.

Percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a comparison between the outcomes of grayscale US guidance and Sonazoid CEUS Kupffer phase guidance using propensity score matching

Purpose To assess the utility of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for guiding percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Materials and Methods The medical records of patients who had undergone ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous MWA between July 2020 and June 2022, were reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a ratio of 1:1 was used to balance the potential bias between the grayscale US-guided and Sonazoid CEUS-guided groups. Local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic recurrence (IR), and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Results Of 252 patients enrolled, 247 achieved complete ablation, and the technical effectiveness was 98.0% (247/252). Of these 247 patients, 158 were in the grayscale US-guided group and 89 in the Sonazoid CEUS-guided group. The median follow-up period was 14.6 months. After PSM, there were no significant differences in LTP, IR, or complication rates between the two groups (p = 0.100, p = 0.511, p > 0.99, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified tumor size ≥ 3 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 7.945; 95% CI, 2.591-24.370; p < 0.001), perivascular (HR, 2.331; 95% CI, 1.068-5.087; p = 0.034), and tumor depth > 8 cm (HR, 3.194; 95% CI, 1.439-7.091; p = 0.004) as significant factors associated with LTP. For tumors with poor vision on grayscale US, Sonazoid CEUS-guided ablation achieved a better LTP rate than grayscale US-guided ablation (3.7% vs.14.8%, p = 0.032). Conclusion For tumors with poor vision on grayscale US, Sonazoid CEUS guidance is recommended for better local tumor control.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous and Open Surgery Approaches in The Animal Model of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Induced Disc Degeneration.

Animal models provide a deeper understanding about various complications and better demonstrate the effect of therapeutic approaches. One of the issues in the low back pain (LBP) model is the invasiveness of the procedure and it does not mimic actual disease conditions in humans. The purpose of the present study was to compare the ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous approach with the open-surgery method in the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced disc degeneration model for the first time to showcase the advantages of this recently developed, minimally invasive method. In this experimental study, eight male rabbits were divided into two groups (open-surgery and US-guided). Relevant discs were punctured by two approaches and TNF-α was injected into them. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to assess the disc height index (DHI) at all stages. Also morphological changes (annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus) were evaluated by assessing Pfirrmann grade and histological evaluation (Hematoxylin and Eosin). The findings indicated targeted discs became degenerated after six weeks. DHI in both groups was significantly reduced (P<0.0001), however the difference was not significant between the two groups. In the open-surgery group, osteophyte formation was seen at six and eighteen weeks after the puncture. Pfirrmann grading revealed significant differences between injured and adjacent uninjured discs (P<0.0001). The US-guided method indicated significantly fewer signs of degeneration after six (P=0.0110) and eighteen (P=0.0328) weeks. Histological scoring showed significantly lower degeneration in the US-guided group (P=0.0039). The US-guided method developed a milder grade condition and such a model better mimics the chronic characteristics of LBP and the procedure is more ethically accepted. Therefore, the US-guided method could be a merit approach for future research in this domain as a safe, practical and low-cost method.

Investigation of Real-Time Diagnostic Ultrasound as a Means of Biofeedback Training in Transversus Abdominus Re-Education of Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

Background: It is believed that ultrasound-guided imaging of activation/contraction of the deep abdominal muscles (such as transervsus abdominis) is useful for assisting deep muscle re-education, which is often dysfunctional in non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Thus, this pilot study aimed to evaluate the use of real-time ultrasound (US) as a feedback device for transverse abdominis (TrA) activation/contraction during an exercise program in chronic NSLBP patients. Methods: Twenty-three chronic NSLBP patients were recruited and randomly assigned to a US-guided (n = 12, 8 women, 47.6 ± 2.55 years) or control group (n = 11, 9 women, 46.9 ± 4.29 years). The same motor control-based exercise program was applied to both groups. All patients received physiotherapy twice per week for seven weeks. Outcome measures, tested at baseline and post-intervention, included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, TrA activation level (measured through a pressure biofeedback unit-based developed protocol), seven established motor control tests, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results: For each group, all outcome variables yielded statistical differences post-intervention (p < 0.05), indicating significant improvements. However, there were no significant group x time interactions for any of the outcomes (p > 0.05), thus, indicating no superiority of the US-guided group over the control. Conclusions: The addition of US as a visual feedback device for TrA re-education during a motor control exercise program was not proven superior to traditional physiotherapy.

Percutaneous ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a comparison between the outcomes of ultrasound guidance and CT guidance using propensity score matching.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of percutaneous ablation guided by ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) in colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM). This study included patients with CLOM treated with percutaneous ablation from January 2008 to January 2021 in this observational study. Only lesions visualized on both CT and US images were further analyzed according to whether patients' initial ablation treatments utilized US guidance or CT guidance. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival after propensity score matching (PSM). The LTP-free survival and treatment-related outcomes were compared between these two groups. PSM identified 116 patients from each group, with 269 and 238 lesions in the USguided and CT-guided groups, respectively. US-guided ablation had a shorter average procedure time and lower cost than CT-guided ablation (27.54±12.06 minutes vs. 32.70±13.88 minutes, P=0.003; $2,175.13±618.17 vs. $2,455.49±710.25, P=0.002). For patients >60 years of age, the cumulative LTP rate at 1 year was lower in the US-guided group than in the CT-guided group (17.8% vs. 25.1%, P=0.038). For patients with perivascular liver lesions, the cumulative LTP rate at 1 year was lower in the US-guided group (14.4% vs. 28.2%, P=0.040). For patients whose age is >60 years or who have perivascular liver lesions, USguided ablation is better than CT-guided ablation, with a shorter treatment time and lower costs when both ablation methods are feasible for patients.

Efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in anterior mediastinal masses

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB) using ultrasound (US)-guided and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-guided procedures for anterior mediastinal masses (AMMs). MethodsIn total, 284 consecutive patients (166 men, 118 women; mean age, 43.0 ​± ​18.4 years) who underwent PCNB for AMMs were enrolled. Patients were divided into the US-guided group (n ​= ​133) and the CEUS-guided group (n ​= ​151). PCNB was performed using a core needle (16-gauge or 18-gauge). Internal necrosis, diagnostic yield, and diagnostic accuracy were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe predominant final diagnosis of the cases in this study was thymoma (29.7%), lymphoma (20.5%), thymic carcinoma (13.3%), and germ cell tumour (13.3%), respectively. There was no significant difference in patient age, sex, number of percutaneous biopsies, or display rate of internal necrosis on conventional US between the two groups. The rate of internal necrosis of the lesions was significantly higher after contrast agent injection (72.2% vs. 41.7%; P ​< ​0.001). The CEUS-guided group had a higher diagnostic yield than the US-guided group (100% vs. 89.5%, P ​< ​0.001). There was no significant difference between the diagnostic accuracy of the CEUS-guided and US-guided groups (97.3% vs. 97.4%; P ​= ​1.000). None of the patients experienced adverse reactions or complications after US-guided or CEUS-guided PCNB. ConclusionsCEUS-guided PCNB can improve the diagnostic yield by optimizing the biopsy procedure.

Preoperative Ultrasound‐Guided Incisional Biopsy Enhances the Pathological Accuracy of Incisional Biopsy of Cutaneous Melanoma

To assess the feasibility of preoperative ultrasound (US)-guided incisional biopsy through a prospective controlled clinical trial. This was a prospective, double-arm, single-center study of Chinese patients. Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. Fourteen patients received incisional biopsies for which the choice of biopsy area relied on a clinical evaluation, and 16 patients received incisional biopsies for which the choice of biopsy area relied on a US-guided evaluation. The following procedure was used in the US-guided incisional biopsy group: 1) clinical and dermoscopic evaluation of skin lesions; 2) US examination; 3) incisional biopsy; 4) surgical excision; and 5) histopathological examination. The same procedure was used in the non-US-guided group except without US examination. In the non-US-guided group, the mean tumor thicknesses obtained from incisional biopsy and postoperative histopathological examination were 2.1 and 4.1 mm, respectively. Seven melanomas were underestimated by incisional biopsy, resulting in margins narrower than currently recommended. In the US-guided group, the mean tumor thicknesses obtained from US, incisional biopsy, and postoperative histopathological examination were 3.4, 2.9, and 2.7 mm, respectively. In only 3 melanomas was the tumor thickness of the incisional biopsy less than that of the postoperative histopathological examination, demonstrating that US-guided biopsy obtains the maximum thickness area. Preoperative US-guided incisional biopsy can enhance the pathological accuracy of incisional biopsy, which may allow us to better perform surgical excision with safe peripheral surgical margins.

Comparison Between Open and Ultrasonography Guided Venous Access Ports in Children with Malignancy

Background: Long-term central venous access is used in children for various reasons specially for delivering chemotherapy. Since vessels in children have smaller diameters, they are more prone to injury and complications such as thrombosis. Different methods are used for implantation of port-a-cath in children. We aimed to compare the complications of insertion of central venous access ports between two methods of open and ultrasound (US) guided. Methods: All children who were referred to pediatric surgery department of a children hospital from April 2018 to March 2020 for implantation of port-a-cath were included. Right jugular vein was the target vein and patients were randomly divided between two methods of insertion of open lateral neck exploration and ultrasound real-time guided percutaneous insertion and the reservoir was fixed in subpectoral fascia pouch. All open cases in which jugular vein was ligated proximally were excluded. Patients were followed up for early and late complications two days and one week later by the surgical team, then monthly by a trained nurse and were referred to the surgeon if any complication or malfunction had occurred for at least 6 months. Results: We included 76 patients (21 girls and 55 boys) less than 18 years of age: 24 patients with ultrasound guided method (1-13 years, median 3 years) and 52 patients with open exploration method (4 months-17 years, median 6 years). We observed no statistically significant difference between two groups with respect to sex, underlying disease, and complications. Most patients had hematological malignancies including ALL (52.9%), AML (19.1%) and the rest had solid organ malignancies. Early complications were observed in 2 (3.8%) in the open and 1 (4.2%) in the US- guided group (P=1). Late complications were observed in 9 (17.3%) patients in the open group and 1 (4.2%) in the US guided group. Infection was observed in 9.6% and malfunction in 5.8% of the open group leading to earlier removal of the catheter. There was not any complication indicative of infection in the US-guided group. Conclusion: US-guided method can be suggested for routine use as a safe method of insertion of port venous access in children.

Real-time ultrasound-guided lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia in obese or appropriate body condition score dogs: A randomized clinical trial

Correctly identifying the puncture site and needle position in obese dogs can be challenging to achieve epidural anaesthesia. The current study aimed to evaluate a real-time ultrasound-guided technique, to perform epidural anaesthesia in obese or appropriate body condition score dogs, based on visualization of local anaesthetic flow during its injection, compared to the traditional method of palpation of anatomical landmarks. Seventy-two client-owned dogs were evaluated in a prospective, comparative, randomized clinical trial, allocated into four groups of 18 dogs. For the Palpation-guided 1 (PG1) and 2 (PG2) groups, epidural anaesthesia was based on palpating anatomical landmarks. Dogs with a body condition score (BCS) 1-5/9 were included in the PG1 (non-obese), and those with a BCS 6-9/9 in PG2 (obese) groups. In the Ultrasound-guided 1 (USG1 - BCS 1-5/9) and 2 (USG2 – BCS 6-9/9) groups, epidural anaesthesia was guided by ultrasound (US).The flow of anaesthetic through the epidural canal was observed in all dogs by US. There were fewer needle-to-bone contacts in the US-guided groups when performing epidural anaesthesia; this only occurred on the vertebral laminae, never in the vertebral canal. Ultrasound guidance enabled local anaesthetic injection into the epidural space without the need for palpation of anatomical landmarks to guide needle placement. Blood reflux occurred in 11.1% (PG1), 22.2% (PG2), 5.5% (USG1), and 0% (USG2) of the dogs. Ultrasound-guided punctures led to fewer vascular punctures. Epidural anaesthesia was effective in all animals, and no complications were observed.

Feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and flank position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with no apparent hydronephrosis: a randomized controlled trial

PurposeTo investigate the puncture accuracy and feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in flank position for patients with no apparent hydronephrosis.MethodsBetween May 2018 and June 2020, 72 kidney stone patients with no or mild hydronephrosis were randomized into two groups: a CEUS-guided PCNL group and a conventional ultrasound (US)-guided group. Patients’ demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared, including the success rate of puncture via calyceal fornix, the success rate of a single-needle puncture, puncture time, operative time, postoperative hemoglobin loss, stone-free rate, incidence of complications and postoperative stay.ResultsThe success rate of puncture via calyceal fornix for CEUS-guided group was significantly higher than that for conventional US-guided group (86.1 vs. 47.2%, p = 0.002). Patients performed with CEUS-guided PCNL required shorter renal puncture time than those guided with conventional US (36.5 s vs. 61.0 s, p < 0.001). The median postoperative hemoglobin loss in the CEUS-guided group was significantly lower than that in conventional US-guided group (2.5 vs. 14.5 g/L, p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of a single-needle puncture, operative time, stone-free rate, incidence of complications and postoperative stay between the two groups.ConclusionCEUS guidance facilitates identification of the renal calyx fornix, and benefits more precise renal puncture and less hemoglobin loss in PCNL. CEUS-guided PCNL in flank position is a feasible approach to the treatment of kidney stone patients with no apparent hydronephrosis.Trial registration number: ChiCTR1800015417.

A Comparison of Blinded versus Ultrasound-Guided Limited-Open Trigger Finger Release Using the Yasunaga Knife

Background: An open approach is the gold standard for trigger finger (TF) release. However, this may be associated with infection and scar tenderness. Percutaneous trigger release is an alternative, but this can sometimes result in incomplete release and digital nerve injury, even with ultrasound (US) guidance. Limited-open TF release is an intermediate technique that uses a specially designed knife via a 2-3 mm incision. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of blinded versus US-guided limited-open TF release using the Yasunaga knife (Medical U&A, Inc., Japan). Methods: About 138 fingers in 111 patients underwent limited-open TF release using the Yasunaga knife. Green classification was used to grade the severity of TF. Thirty-one patients had grade 3 TF and 80 patients had grade 4 TF. The TF was released in a blinded fashion in 60 patients and using US guidance in 51 patients. Outcome measures included residual triggering, contracture of the proximal interphalangeal joint, visual analog scale (VAS) for assessment of pain, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and the Patel and Moradia grading of patient satisfaction. Complications were also recorded. Results: Six patients had residual triggering in the blinded group, whereas it resolved in all patients in the US-guided group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.03). Patients in both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and Quick DASH score postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the two groups for these two outcomes. Patient satisfaction was graded as excellent by 20 patients and good by 30 patients in the US-guided group compared to eight excellent and 45 good in the blinded group. Conclusion: The incidence of residual triggering was lower and overall satisfaction higher in patients who underwent US-guided limited-open TF release using the Yasunaga knife. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Conventional Tracheostomy: Technique and Outcome

Abstract Background: In the 21st century, the majority of trache-ostomies are now inserted by the intensivists in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is one of the most frequent procedures performed in critically ill patients. It has been advocated for those requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation because it facilitates weaning by decreasing the work of breathing, decreases the requirement for sedation and may allow for earlier patient mobilization, feeding and physical and occu-pational therapy. Aim of Study: To evaluate ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy in critically ill patients regarding effect on outcome (weaning from mechanical ventilation and ICU stay), duration of the technique, success rate and to evaluate incidence of perioperative, early and late complications. Patients and Methods: Our study is a randomized con-trolled clinical trial conducted on 40 critically ill patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit at Ain Shams University Hospitals, from the period from September 2020 until March 2021 they were intubated and mechanically ventilated and required elective percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. Results: US-guided group showed fewer procedural com-plications compared to conventional group. We had faced procedural complications in conventional group in form of 2 (10%) of patients suffer from hypoxemia, Pneumothorax, decannulation and post. Tracheal wall injury. 3 (15%) of patients had transient hypotension and false passage. And 5 (25%) cases of perforation of ETT cuff during insertion, one case (5%) of subcutaneous emphysema and 7 (35%) cases of minor bleeding compered to three cases of minor bleeding in US-guided group, one case of decannulation and three case of transient hypotension. No early complications were detected in both study groups; except one case of tube obstruction or displacement in conventional group. According to late com-plications our analysis illustrates decrease in late complication in US-guided group 2 (10%) versus 4 (20%) in conventional group. In US-guided group only two cases of Stoma site infection resolved by antibiotic and local care. In conventional group there were two case of Tracheoesophageal fistula, one case of Stoma site infection and one case of Tracheoinnominate fistula. Conclusion: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy could be a safer procedure when performed by using peri- and preoperative US assistance. The use of US guidance for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy could reduce the complication rates of the procedure. The ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy seems to reduce the late and early complications when compared to the anatomical landmark guided Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Pre-procedural US-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy can be considered as a reliable tool to increase safety and improve outcomes of elective tracheostomy.

Accuracy and Feasibility of Ultrasound-Guided Intra-articular Injection of the Rat Hip Joint

Intra-articular injection is frequently used as an effective diagnostic and treatment tool for hip joint diseases. However, the underlying treatment mechanism remains unclear because of a lack of experimental animal models. A challenge facing researchers is how to accurately and consistently perform injections involving animal hip joints. The purpose of this study, then, was to establish an ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular (IA) injection technique using rat hip joints and to evaluate its accuracy and feasibility versus a fluoroscopy (FL)-guided technique. For this study, 20 US-guided and 20 FL-guided IA injections were administered to separate groups of Sprague-Dawley rats. For each procedure, 50 μL of iohexol was injected into the hip joint using a 25G needle. The US-guided injections were performed using a linear probe, and the FL-guided IA injections were performed using C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy. All injections were verified by computed tomography imaging. The number of successful injections and needle repositions per injection, as well as operating times, were recorded, and the rats were observed for complications for 10 d after the injections. Statistical analysis was used to compare US-guided and FL-guided techniques with significance set at p < 0.05. The success rate was markedly higher for the US-guided interventions (90%) than for the FL-guided interventions (75%) (p<0.05). The intervention time was shorter in the US-guided group (95.95 ± 8.376 s) than in the FL-guided group (110.70 ± 20.236 s) (p < 0.05), and the median number of needles repositioned per injection in the US-guided group (1.20 ± 0.41) was notably less than that in the FL-guided group (1.60 ± 0.68) (p < 0.05). A puncture site hematoma was noted in two rat hips (10%) the day after injection in the FL-guided group. Overall, the study indicated that ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of the hip is a feasible, accurate and safe method for use in rats. This makes it a promising tool for diagnosing coxofemoral pain, producing hip osteoarthritis animal models and administering intra-articular medication.