US General Surgery Residents Research Articles

The current landscape of global international surgical rotations for general surgery residents in the United States: a survey by the Association for Program Directors in Surgery’s (APDS) global surgery taskforce

As interest in global surgery increases among surgical trainees, more programs are incorporating global surgery rotations into residency training. The structure of such rotations varies widely and there are multiple barriers to establishing, maintaining, and expanding international global surgery rotations. This study assesses the existing opportunities for global surgery experiences at US general surgery residency programs and explores opportunities for sharing resources and expertise among the Association of Program Directors in Surgery’s membership.

Disparities in Mentorship and Implications for US Surgical Resident Education and Wellness

Many surgeons cite mentorship as a critical component of training. However, little evidence exists regarding factors associated with mentorship and the influence of mentorship on trainee education or wellness. To evaluate factors associated with surgical trainees' perceptions of meaningful mentorship, assess associations of mentorship with resident education and wellness, and evaluate programmatic variation in mentorship. A voluntary, anonymous survey was administered to clinically active residents in all accredited US general surgery residency programs following the 2019 American Board of Surgery In-Service Training Examination. Data were analyzed from July 2019 to July 2022. Residents were asked, "Do you have a mentor who genuinely cares about you and your career?" Resident characteristics associated with report of meaningful mentorship were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. Associations of mentorship with education (clinical and operative autonomy) and wellness (career satisfaction, burnout, thoughts of attrition, suicidality) were examined using cluster-adjusted multivariable logistic regression controlling for resident and program factors. Residents' race and ethnicity were self-identified using US census categories (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White), which were combined and dichotomized as non-Hispanic White vs non-White or Hispanic. A total of 6956 residents from 301 programs completed the survey (85.6% response rate); 6373 responded to all relevant questions (2572 [40.3%] female; 2539 [39.8%] non-White or Hispanic). Of these, 4256 (66.8%) reported meaningful mentorship. Non-White or Hispanic residents were less likely than non-Hispanic White residents to report meaningful mentorship (odds ratio [OR], 0.81, 95% CI, 0.71-0.91). Senior residents (postgraduate year 4/5) were more likely to report meaningful mentorship than interns (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.59-3.62). Residents with meaningful mentorship were more likely to endorse operative autonomy (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 3.35-4.46) and less likely to report burnout (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.46-0.58), thoughts of attrition (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36-0.50), and suicidality (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60) compared with residents without meaningful mentorship. One-third of trainees reported lack of meaningful mentorship, particularly non-White or Hispanic trainees. Although education and wellness are multifactorial issues, mentorship was associated with improvement; thus, efforts to facilitate mentorship are needed, especially for minoritized residents.

National ABSITE Preparation Practices: A Survey of General Surgery Residency Program Directors

The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) was designed as a low-stakes, medical knowledge examination for US general surgery residency programs. However, in practice, this exam has been utilized for higher stakes purposes, such as resident promotion or remediation, and fellowship selection. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ABSITE preparation resources, but best practices for ABSITE preparation and national preparatory habits are currently unknown. The aim of this work was to determine current residency programs' strategies for ABSITE preparation. We distributed an electronic survey to program directors or program coordinators of US general surgery programs asking them to anonymously report program ABSITE educational practices and ABSITE scores. We analyzed the proportion of responses using descriptive statistics and compared the effect of various strategies using the Mann-Whitney testing for nonparametric data. An average ABSITE percentile score was calculated for each residency based on program self-reported scores. Association of Program Directors (APDS) Listserv PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residency programs participating at the time of distribution (278). Response rate was 24% (66/278); 41 programs (62.1%) identified as university-affiliated, and 25 (37.9%) were community-based. Median intern class size was 8 (range: 3-14), including preliminary interns. Average ABSITE percentile score was 52.8% (range 36.9%-67.6%). There were no significant differences in ABSITE scores based on affiliation or program size. Educational resources utilized for ABSITE preparation included SCORE (89.3%), Q-banks (50%), and surgical textbooks (25.8%). The majority (56.1%) of programs reported using a year-long curriculum for ABSITE preparation, and 66.6% used a time-limited curriculum completed in the months immediately prior to ABSITE. Most programs reported that ABSITE scores were a low priority (63.6%) or not a priority (13.6%). The existence of a year-long curriculum for ABSITE was positively correlated with score as compared to programs without a year-long curricula (53.9% vs 48.5%, p <0.01). Programs using a time-limited curriculum demonstrated lower scores as compared to programs without time-limited curricula (51.3% v 56.1%, p < 0.01). General surgery programs use a variety of strategies to prepare residents for the ABSITE. Despite reporting that they utilize ABSITE scores for a variety of high stakes purposes including evaluation for promotion and as a predictor of the preparedness for the ABS QE, many programs reported that they consider ABSITE scores as a low priority. A year-long focused curriculum was the only strategy correlated with increased scores, which may reflect the value of encouraging consistent studying and spaced repetition. Additional work is needed to guide programs in optimal utilization of ABSITE scores for remediation and resident evaluation, as well as understanding how ABSITE preparatory strategies correlate with clinical performance.

Program Website Evaluation Regarding Dedicated Research Years Offered in General Surgery Residency Programs in the United States

IntroductionResearch is a vital component in the advancements of surgical sciences due to the reliance of treatment options on innovations and outcomes of patient care. This study aimed to identify research pathways, opportunities, and academic productivities of different general surgery residency programs in the United States. Materials and MethodsA web-based review was conducted concerning accredited US general surgery residency programs. Each program's official website was assessed for the availability of research year, compulsory status, duration, type, structure, and location. The study also identified faculty supervision, research day, funding, output, and opportunities to obtain an advanced degree. ResultsData were collected from all 313 general surgery programs in the United States, out of which 127 (41%) offered a dedicated research year to their residents. The research year was deemed mandatory in 27 programs (8%) and optional in 100 programs (32%). Seventy-two programs (23%) offered to start the dedicated research year after postgraduate year 2 or postgraduate year 3. Twenty-two programs (7.02%) provided examples of resident publications and presentations. Resident research day was cited by 42 programs (13.41%). On campus research opportunity was mentioned by nine programs (2.8%), while the off campus chance was provided by 10 programs (3.19%). Furthermore, 36 programs (11.5%) demonstrated potential funding sources. Finally, 38 (12.14%) programs mentioned receiving advanced degrees after the research year. ConclusionsAlthough dedicated research time is provided to trainees for some research programs, there is a lack of structure and the need to expand the available content and information regarding research opportunities for the various general surgery residency programs.

20 Years of Stability: Decreasing Vascular Case Volumes Have Not Changed National Patterns of Vascular Fellowship Applications Among US General Surgery Residents

20 Years of Stability: Decreasing Vascular Case Volumes Have Not Changed National Patterns of Vascular Fellowship Applications Among US General Surgery Residents

Coverage of Fertility Preservation and Treatment Among Surgical Trainees in the United States of America

Surgery trainees spend their prime fertility years in training, which leads to delays in childbearing, accompanying infertility challenges, and high-risk pregnancies. Literature report of institutional support for fertility preservation (egg/sperm freezing) and treatment is lacking. The cost is particularly prohibitive while receiving a resident physician salary. This study aimed to assess availability of fertility resources and institutional coverage of fertility services to US General Surgery Residents (GSR) and Breast Fellows. We composed and distributed a 26-question survey to GS residency and fellowship program directors nationwide to survey residents and fellows. Summary and descriptive statistics were tabulated, and categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi square test. A total of 234 US surgical trainees (male n = 75, female n = 155, unreported n = 4) completed the survey. Total of 12 % of trainees reported having been counseled on family planning/fertility treatment during training, and only 5.1% were counseled on fertility preservation. Perceived lack of support from program (p = 0.027) and counseling of fertility preservation (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with female gender. A minority (12.5%) reported having insurance coverage for fertility preservation and 26% had coverage of fertility treatment. In addition, 2.6% respondents pursued fertility preservation while in training and 33% reported they would pursue fertility preservation if it was covered by insurance. Fertility preservation is rarely discussed in US General Surgery residency programs. The large majority of GSR lacks awareness of insurance coverage of fertility preservation and treatment. Strong efforts are necessary to improve fertility education for GSR and insurance coverage to meet trainee's needs.

Resident Operative Autonomy and Attending Verbal Feedback Differ by Resident and Attending Gender.

This study tests the null hypotheses that overall sentiment and gendered words in verbal feedback and resident operative autonomy relative to performance are similar for female and male residents. Female and male surgical residents may experience training differently, affecting the quality of learning and graduated autonomy. A longitudinal, observational study using a Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning collaborative dataset describing resident and attending evaluations of resident operative performance and autonomy and recordings of verbal feedback from attendings from surgical procedures performed at 54 US general surgery residency training programs from 2016 to 2021. Overall sentiment, adjectives, and gendered words in verbal feedback were quantified by natural language processing. Resident operative autonomy and performance, as evaluated by attendings, were reported on 5-point ordinal scales. Performance-adjusted autonomy was calculated as autonomy minus performance. The final dataset included objective assessments and dictated feedback for 2683 surgical procedures. Sentiment scores were higher for female residents (95 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-100] vs 86 [IQR 2-100]; P < 0.001). Gendered words were present in a greater proportion of dictations for female residents (29% vs 25%; P = 0.04) due to male attendings disproportionately using male-associated words in feedback for female residents (28% vs 23%; P = 0.01). Overall, attendings reported that male residents received greater performance-adjusted autonomy compared with female residents (P < 0.001). Sentiment and gendered words in verbal feedback and performance-adjusted operative autonomy differed for female and male general surgery residents. These findings suggest a need to ensure that trainees are given appropriate and equitable operative autonomy and feedback.

National Comparison of Program Director Perceptions vs. Resident Reports of the Learning Environment and Well-Being

Our research objectives were to (1) assess the correlation between PD perceptions and their residents' reported experiences and (2) identify PD and program characteristics associated with alignment between PD perceptions and their residents' reports. A survey was administered to US general surgery residents following the 2019 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) to study wellness (burnout, thoughts of attrition, and suicidality) and mistreatment (gender discrimination, sexual harassment, racial/ethnic/religious discrimination, bullying). General surgery program directors (PDs) were surveyed about the degree to which they perceived mistreatment and wellness within their programs. Concordance between PDs' perceptions and their residents' reports was assessed using Spearman correlations. Multivariable logistic regression models examined factors associated with alignment between PDs and residents. Of 6,126 residents training at SECOND Trial-enrolled programs, 5,240 (85.5%) responded to the ABSITE survey. All 212 PDs of programs enrolled in the SECOND Trial (100%) responded to the PD survey. Nationally, the proportion of PDs perceiving wellness issues was similar to the proportion of residents reporting them (e.g., 54.9% of PDs perceive that burnout is a problem vs. 40.1% of residents experience at least one burnout symptom weekly); however, the proportion of PDs perceiving mistreatment vastly underestimated the proportion of residents reporting it (e.g., 9.3% of all PDs perceive vs. 65.9% of all residents report bullying). Correlations between PDs' perceptions of problems within their program and their residents' reports were weak for racial/ethnic/religious discrimination (r = 0.176, p = 0.019), sexual harassment (r = 0.180, p = 0.019), burnout (r = 0.198, p = 0.007), and thoughts of attrition (r = 0.193, p = 0.007), and non-existent for gender discrimination, bullying, or suicidality. Multivariable regression models did not identify any program or PD characteristics that were consistently associated with improved resident-program director alignment. Resident and PD perceptions were generally disparate regarding mistreatment, burnout, thoughts of attrition, and suicidality. Reconciling this discrepancy is critical to enacting meaningful change to improve the learning environment and resident well-being.

Characteristics Associated With Outstanding General Surgery Residency Graduate Performance, as Rated by Surgical Educators

Characteristics of outstanding graduating surgical residents are currently undefined. Identifying these qualities may be important in guiding resident selection and resident education. To determine characteristics that are most strongly associated with being rated as an outstanding graduating surgical resident. The multi-institutional study had 3 phases. First, an expert panel developed a list of characteristics embodied by top graduating surgical residents. Second, groups of faculty from 14 US general-surgery residency programs ranked 2017 through 2020 graduates into quartiles of overall performance. Third, faculty evaluated their graduates on each characteristic using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using Spearman rank-order correlation to identify which individual characteristics were associated with overall graduate performance. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) ordinal regression was performed to select a parsimonious model to predict the outcome of overall performance rating from individual characteristic scores. Surgical educators' rankings of general surgery residency graduates' overall performance. Fifty faculty from 14 US residency programs with a median of 13 (range, 5-30) years of surgical education experience evaluated 297 general surgery residency graduates. Surgical educators identified 21 characteristics that they believed outstanding graduating surgical residents possessed. Two hundred ninety-seven surgical residency graduates were evaluated. Higher scores in every characteristic correlated with better overall performance. Characteristics most strongly associated with higher overall performance scores were surgical judgment (r = 0.728; P < .001), leadership (r = 0.726; P < .001), postoperative clinical skills (r = 0.715; P < .001), and preoperative clinical skills (r = 0.707; P < .001). The remainder of the characteristics were moderately associated with overall performance. The LASSO regression model identified 3 characteristics from which overall resident performance could be accurately predicted without measuring other qualities: surgical judgment (odds ratio [OR] per 1 level of 5-level Likert scale OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.51), leadership (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06-1.48), and medical knowledge (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). All individual characteristics identified by surgical educators as being qualities of outstanding graduating surgical residents were positively associated with overall graduate performance. Surgical judgment and leadership skills had the strongest individual associations. Assessment of only 3 qualities (surgical judgment, leadership, and medical knowledge) were required to predict overall resident performance ratings. These findings highlight the importance of developing specific surgical judgment and leadership skills curricula and assessments during surgical residency.

Representativeness of Workplace-Based Operative Performance Assessments for Resident Operative Experience

Workplace-based assessment is increasingly prevalent in surgical education, especially for assessing operative skill. With current implementations, not all observed clinical performances are assessed, in part because trainees often have discretion about when they seek assessment. As a result, these samples of observed operative performances may not be representative of the full breadth of experience of surgical trainees. Therefore, analyses of these samples may be biased. We aimed to benchmark patterns of procedures logged in the SIMPL operative performance assessment system against records of trainee experience in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs. We analyzed SIMPL longitudinal intraoperative performance assessments from categorical trainees in US general surgery residency programs. We compared overall patterns of how procedures are logged in SIMPL and in ACGME case logs using a Pearson correlation, and we examined differences in how individual procedures are logged in each system using Fisher's exact test. Total procedure frequency from the SIMPL dataset was strongly correlated with total procedure frequency from ACGME case logs (r = 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.90). A subset of these procedures (10 of 116 procedures) was logged more frequently in the SIMPL dataset. These 10 procedures accounted for 56% of SIMPL observations and 30% of ACGME logged cases. Case complexity was comparable for assessments initiated by residents and faculty. Samples of intraoperative performance ratings gathered using the SIMPL application largely resemble ACGME case logs. There is no evidence to indicate that residents preferentially select fewer complex cases for assessment.

General Surgery Going Viral: Current Trends in Social Media Utilization by General Surgery Residency Programs

This study examined the current and changing trends in utilization of social media platforms by general surgery residency programs. US general surgery residency programs were identified. Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter were surveyed for active accounts specific to an institution's general surgery residency program. Metrics for these accounts included: Date of first post/date of account creation, total number of posts, number of followers, number of posts categorized per year for 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021. Active accounts were categorized into university based, university affiliated, or independent programs. Number of followers and the number of posts were compared among those categories. Data collection took place from 7/21/2021 - 8/2/2021. 295 social media accounts were identified. 55% of all programs have at least one social media account. Instagram (47.8%) and Twitter (36.3%) make up the majority of the social media accounts. The majority of all social media accounts (51.2%) were created in 2020. Instagram saw the largest increase in activity in 2020 with posting increasing by 403.7% compared to 2019. Twitter accounts had the highest amount of posts in 2020 (9940). Instagram accounts have the highest follower base (113,499). Facebook also saw increased posting in 2020 but its overall account creation has remained stagnant. University based program accounts have higher on average followers and posts when compared to independent program accounts. Social media accounts specific to general surgery residency programs have grown steadily in the past few years, with a dramatic rise of account creation and activity in 2020. Instagram and Twitter serve as the dominant platforms for new account creation and activity. University based programs attract more followers than independent programs on Instagram and Twitter.

Factors Affecting Family Planning and Fertility Preservation Decisions among US General Surgery Residents: A Nationwide Survey

Introduction: General surgery trainees (GSTs) spend their prime fertility years in training. As more women enter the surgical workforce, family planning and fertility preservation considerations are of utmost relevance. The needs of fertility preservation/treatment and factors contributing to family planning decisions are unknown. This study aimed to examine potential barriers to family planning/childbearing among US GSTs. Methods: We composed and distributed a 26-question survey to all general surgery and fellowship program directors nationwide to survey GSTs. Summary and descriptive statistics were tabulated and categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: A total of 234 US GSTs completed the survey (male 32.1%, female 66.2%, unreported 1.7%). Average age of respondents was 32.3 years. Trainee work hours (p=0.007) and female gender (p=0.002) were found to be associated with delay of childbirth. More women trainees reported having considered fertility preservation (p<0.001). Of those who answered questions regarding prohibitive factors for childbearing (n=74), balancing time (93.2%), career/education goals (63%), and cost (59.5%) were the most commonly reported prohibitive factors. More female trainees reported time (p=0.021) and career/education goals (p=0.001) as “moderately prohibitive” or “very prohibitive” compared with their male counterparts. In addition, 9% of trainees reported that their family planning was affected by the COVID pandemic. Conclusion: Balancing time and career goals are more prohibitive factors for childbearing among female GST. Institutional resources should tailor to gender-specific needs and address barriers to family planning, fertility treatment, and childbearing during surgery training. [Formula presented]

Coverage of Fertility Preservation and Treatment among US General Surgery Residents: The First Nationwide Survey

Coverage of Fertility Preservation and Treatment among US General Surgery Residents: The First Nationwide Survey

Experiences of LGBTQ+ Residents in US General Surgery Training Programs

Previous studies have shown high rates of mistreatment among US general surgery residents, leading to poor well-being. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) residents represent a high-risk group for mistreatment; however, their experience in general surgery programs is largely unexplored. To determine the national prevalence of mistreatment and poor well-being for LGBTQ+ surgery residents compared with their non-LGBTQ+ peers. A voluntary, anonymous survey adapting validated survey instruments was administered to all clinically active general surgery residents training in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery programs following the 2019 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination. Self-reported mistreatment, sources of mistreatment, perceptions of learning environment, career satisfaction, burnout, thoughts of attrition, and suicidality. The associations between LGBTQ+ status and (1) mistreatment, (2) burnout, (3) thoughts of attrition, and (4) suicidality were examined using multivariable regression models, accounting for interactions between gender and LGBTQ+ identity. A total of 6956 clinically active residents completed the survey (85.6% response rate). Of 6381 respondents included in this analysis, 305 respondents (4.8%) identified as LGBTQ+ and 6076 (95.2%) as non-LGBTQ+. Discrimination was reported among 161 LGBTQ+ respondents (59.2%) vs 2187 non-LGBTQ+ respondents (42.3%; P < .001); sexual harassment, 131 (47.5%) vs 1551 (29.3%; P < .001); and bullying, 220 (74.8%) vs 3730 (66.9%; P = .005); attending surgeons were the most common overall source. Compared with non-LGBTQ+ men, LGBTQ+ residents were more likely to report discrimination (men: odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% CI, 1.78-3.72; women: OR, 25.30; 95% CI, 16.51-38.79), sexual harassment (men: OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.39-2.99; women: OR, 5.72; 95% CI, 4.09-8.01), and bullying (men: OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.07-2.12; women: OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.37-2.91). LGBTQ+ residents reported similar perceptions of the learning environment, career satisfaction, and burnout (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.97-1.52) but had more frequent considerations of leaving their program (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.52-2.74) and suicide (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.26-3.04). This increased risk of suicidality was eliminated after adjusting for mistreatment (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.90-2.39). Mistreatment is a common experience for LGBTQ+ surgery residents, with attending surgeons being the most common overall source. Increased suicidality among LGBTQ+ surgery residents is associated with this mistreatment. Multifaceted interventions are necessary to develop safer and more inclusive learning environments.

National Evaluation of the Association Between Resident Labor Union Participation and Surgical Resident Well-being

Labor unions are purported to improve working conditions; however, little evidence exists regarding the effect of resident physician unions. To evaluate the association of resident unions with well-being, educational environment, salary, and benefits among surgical residents in the US. This national cross-sectional survey study was based on a survey administered in January 2019 after the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). Clinically active residents at all nonmilitary US general surgery residency programs accredited by the American Council of Graduate Medical Education who completed the 2019 ABSITE were eligible for participation. Data were analyzed from December 5, 2020, to March 16, 2021. Presence of a general surgery resident labor union. Rates of labor union coverage among non-health care employees within a region were used as an instrumental variable (IV) for the presence of a labor union at a residency program. The primary outcome was burnout, which was assessed using a modified version of the abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory and was defined as experiencing any symptom of depersonalization or emotional exhaustion at least weekly. Secondary outcomes included suicidality, measures of job satisfaction, duty hour violations, mistreatment, educational environment, salary, and benefits. A total of 5701 residents at 285 programs completed the pertinent survey questions (response rate, 85.6%), of whom 3219 (56.5%) were male, 3779 (66.3%) were White individuals, 449 (7.9%) were of Hispanic ethnicity, 4239 (74.4%) were married or in a relationship, and 1304 (22.9%) had or were expecting children. Among respondents, 690 residents were from 30 unionized programs (10.5% of programs). There was no difference in burnout for residents at unionized vs nonunionized programs (297 [43.0%] vs 2175 [43.4%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.75-1.13]; IV difference in probability, 0.15 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.42]). There were no significant differences in suicidality, job satisfaction, duty hour violations, mistreatment, educational environment, salary, or benefits except that unionized programs more frequently offered 4 weeks instead of 2 to 3 weeks of vacation (27 [93.1%] vs 52 [30.6%]; OR, 19.18 [95% CI, 3.92-93.81]; IV difference in probability, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.09-1.45]) and more frequently offered housing stipends (10 [38.5%] vs 9 [16.1%]; OR, 2.15 [95% CI, 0.58-7.95]; IV difference in probability, 0.62 [95% CI 0.04-1.20]). In this evaluation of surgical residency programs in the US, unionized programs offered improved vacation and housing stipend benefits, but resident unions were not associated with improved burnout, suicidality, job satisfaction, duty hour violations, mistreatment, educational environment, or salary.

National Evaluation of Surgical Resident Grit and the Association With Wellness Outcomes

Grit, defined as perseverance and passion for long-term goals, is predictive of success and performance even among high-achieving individuals. Previous studies examining the effect of grit on attrition and wellness during surgical residency are limited by low response rates or single-institution analyses. To characterize grit among US general surgery residents and examine the association between resident grit and wellness outcomes. A cross-sectional national survey study of 7464 clinically active general surgery residents in the US was administered in conjunction with the 2018 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination and assessed grit, burnout, thoughts of attrition, and suicidal thoughts during the previous year. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the association of grit with resident burnout, thoughts of attrition, and suicidal thoughts. Statistical analyses were performed from June 1 to August 15, 2019. Grit was measured using the 8-item Short Grit Scale (scores range from 1 [not at all gritty] to 5 [extremely gritty]). The primary outcome was burnout. Secondary outcomes were thoughts of attrition and suicidal thoughts within the past year. Among 7464 residents (7413 [99.3%] responded; 4469 men [60.2%]) from 262 general surgery residency programs, individual grit scores ranged from 1.13 to 5.00 points (mean [SD], 3.69 [0.58] points). Mean (SD) grit scores were significantly higher in women (3.72 [0.56] points), in residents in postgraduate training year 4 or 5 (3.72 [0.58] points), and in residents who were married (3.72 [0.57] points; all P ≤ .001), although the absolute magnitude of the differences was small. In adjusted analyses, residents with higher grit scores were significantly less likely to report duty hour violations (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93), dissatisfaction with becoming a surgeon (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.48-0.59), burnout (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.49-0.58), thoughts of attrition (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.55-0.67), and suicidal thoughts (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.71). Grit scores were not associated with American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination performance. For individual residency programs, mean program-level grit scores ranged from 3.18 to 4.09 points (mean [SD], 3.69 [0.13] points). In this national survey evaluation, higher grit scores were associated with a lower likelihood of burnout, thoughts of attrition, and suicidal thoughts among general surgery residents. Given that surgical resident grit scores are generally high and much remains unknown about how to employ grit measurement, grit is likely not an effective screening instrument to select residents; instead, institutions should ensure an organizational culture that promotes and supports trainees across this elevated range of grit scores.

Examining the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on the operative volumes of US general surgery residents

BackgroundIn March 2020, the COVID-19 virus global pandemic forced healthcare systems to institute regulations including the cancellation of elective surgical cases, which likely decreased resident operative experience. The objective of this study was to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected operative experiences of US general surgery residents. MethodsThe operative experience of general surgery residents was examined nationally and locally. Aggregate Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for 2018 to 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2019 to 2020 (COVID) graduates were compared using national mean cumulative operative volume for total major and surgeon chief cases. Locally, ACGME case logs were used to analyze the operative experience among residents at a single, academic center. Average operative volumes per month per resident during peak COVID-19 quarantine months were compared with those the previous year. ResultsCompared with 2019 graduates, 2020 graduates completed 1.5% fewer total major cases (1055 ± 155 vs 1071 ± 150, P = .011). This was most evident during chief year, with 8.4% fewer surgeon chief cases logged in 2020 compared with 2019 (264 ± 67 vs 289 ± 69, P < .001). Institutional data revealed that during the peak of the pandemic, residents across all levels completed 42.5% fewer total major operations (12 ± 11 vs 20 ± 14, P < .001). This effect was more pronounced among junior residents compared with senior and chief residents. ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased resident case volume. The ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic for operative competency and autonomy should be carefully examined.

US general surgical trainee performance for representative global surgery procedures

BackgroundMany US general surgery residents are interested in global surgery, but their competence with key procedures is unknown. MethodsUsing a registry managed by the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL), we extracted longitudinal operative performance ratings data for a national cohort of US general surgery residents. Operative performance at the time of graduation was estimated via a Bayesian generalized linear mixed model. ResultsOperative performance ratings for 12,976 procedures performed by 1584 residents in 52 general surgery programs were analyzed. These spanned 17 of 31 (55%) procedures deemed important for global surgical practice. For these procedures, the probability of a graduating resident being deemed competent to perform a procedure was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.86–1.00) but was less than 0.9 for 3 observed procedures. ConclusionOur results highlight gaps in the preparedness of US general surgery trainees to perform procedures deemed most important for global surgery settings.

Are General Surgery Residencies Preparing Graduates for the Practice of Today's General Surgeon? An Analysis of American Board of Surgery Data From Applicants and Re-certifying Surgeons.

To compare the operative experience of general surgery residents and practicing general surgeons. The scope of general surgery has evolved, yet it remains unknown whether residents are being exposed to the right mix of operations during residency. A retrospective review of operative case logs submitted to the American Board of Surgery by US general surgery graduates and practicing general surgeons from 2013 to 2017 was performed. The operative experience of both cohorts was calculated as a proportion of total experience and ranked by frequency. The proportional experience between cohorts was analyzed using factorial analysis of variance. During the 5-year period, 5482 graduates applied for initial American Board of Surgery certification, and 4152 diplomates applied for recertification. Among all operative domains, the graduate experience was similar to that of diplomates in 6 of 12 areas (abdomen, alimentary tract, endoscopy, endocrine, other, skin/soft tissue; all P > 0.05). Residents have a greater experience in subspecialty areas (pediatric, thoracic, trauma, vascular, and plastic) at the expense of fewer breast procedures (all P < 0.05). The 30 operations most commonly performed by graduates comprised 67% of their total operative experience. Among these, residents performed 25 cases ≥10 times, 14 cases ≥20 times, and 7 cases ≥40 times. The operative experience of graduating US general surgery residents is largely similar to that of practicing general surgeons, particularly for core general surgery domains. These data offer reassurance that surgical training in the modern era appropriately exposes residents to the operations they may perform in practice.

Perspectives of US General Surgery Program Directors on Cultural and Fiscal Barriers to Maternity Leave and Postpartum Support During Surgical Training

Although pregnancy during surgical residency is increasingly common, studies of surgical residents have identified challenges associated with pregnancy and motherhood. These include perceptions of different maternity leave policies among institutions, lack of mentorship, stigma, and desire for greater lactation support. To describe the perspective and experience of US surgical program directors regarding maternity leave and postpartum support for surgical residents. This qualitative study included surgical program directors of US general surgery residency programs who were selected using purposive-stratified, criterion-based sampling. Transcripts were collected from semi-structured interviews, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, from October 21, 2018, to June 1, 2019. Maternity leave and postpartum support. Perspectives of program directors regarding maternity leave and postpartum support were categorized into common themes identified using content analysis. A total of 40 US general surgical programs directors (28 [70.0%] male; mean [SD] age, 49.7 [6.8] years) were interviewed, of whom 36 (90.0%) were from university-based programs. All reported having maternity leave policies allowing a duration of leave of 6 weeks or longer. Analysis of program director interviews identified 5 themes: (1) residents are reluctant to extend training despite being offered multiple leave options; (2) childbearing negatively impacts the quality of work of certain residents; (3) lack of formal lactation policies creates practical challenges in supporting residents who are nursing; (4) resentment from coresidents who are asked to provide maternity leave coverage varies based on the prepregnancy reputation of the resident on leave; and (5) lack of salary support limits the practicality of extended leave options. Complex interpersonal issues affected residents differently, including stigma, reluctance to change established surgical training patterns, and challenges with work-life balance. This qualitative study found that sociopolitical issues within surgical training culture and fiscal constraints created obstacles against program directors supporting pregnant residents. These findings suggest that a multidimensional approach to supporting residents through written maternity and lactation policies, structured mentorship and coaching programs, and efforts by leadership to enforce family priorities is needed to promote a surgical culture that normalizes pregnancy and motherhood during training.