Ursodeoxycholic Acid In Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Research Articles

High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid increases risk of adverse outcomes in patients with early stage primary sclerosing cholangitis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in a dose of 28-30 mg/kg/day increases the likelihood of clinical deterioration of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. To compare the risk of adverse clinical endpoints in patients with varying disease status. We reviewed records from patients previously enrolled in a study evaluating the effects of high dose (28-30 mg/kg/day) UDCA in PSC. Patients were grouped according to treatment (UDCA vs. placebo) and baseline disease status (histological stage of PSC, total serum bilirubin). Development of clinical endpoints including death, liver transplantation, cirrhosis, oesophageal varices and cholangiocarcinoma was sought. A total of 150 patients were included of whom 49 patients developed endpoints. There was an increased development of endpoints among patients using UDCA vs. placebo (14 vs. 4, P=0.0151) with early histological disease (stage 1-2, n=88) but not with late stage (stage 3-4, n=62) disease (17 vs. 14, P=0.2031). Occurrence of clinical endpoints was also higher in patients receiving UDCA vs. placebo (16 vs. 2, P=0.0008) with normal bilirubin levels (total bilirubin ≤1.0 mg/dL) but not in patients with elevated bilirubin levels (15 vs. 16, P=0.6018). Among patients not reaching endpoints 31.7% had normalisation of their alkaline phosphatase levels when compared to 14.3% in patients who reached endpoints (P=0.073). The increased risk of adverse events with UDCA treatment when compared with placebo is only apparent in patients with early histological stage disease or normal total bilirubin.

Ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis: meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment on survival and liver histological progression of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains uncertain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect and safety of UDCA in PSC. Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, Web of Science and PubMed (updated to January 2009) and manual bibliographical searches were carried out. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing UDCA with placebo or no treatment was carried out. Eight RCT including 465 patients were assessed. UDCA could significantly improve liver biochemistry, but had no effect on pruritus and fatigue. Meta-analysis of the included RCT showed UDCA had no significant effect on the incidence of death, liver transplantation, and death and/or liver transplantation. However, a significant difference for the incidence of histological improvement was found between the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 9.19; 95% CI: 0.98, 86.15; P = 0.05). Meta-analysis also indicated a reduction trend of histological deterioration and an improvement trend of cholangiographic changes. These trends were constant in the sensitivity analyses. The meta-analysis found that UDCA can improve liver biochemistry and there is a trend towards improvement in liver histology and cholangiography, but has no effect on survival free of transplantation.

High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a cholestatic liver disease that results in progressive fibrosis of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. No effective therapy currently exists for this disease. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hydrophilic bile acid, is the most promising treatment option because of its benign side effect profile and documented benefit in the treatment of other cholestatic liver diseases, including primary biliary cirrhosis. Multiple studies using standard-dosage (8-15 mg/kg/d) and high-dosage (20-30 mg/kg/d) UDCA generally show improvement in liver chemistries in PSC patients, and several show improvement in liver histology. However, the majority of trials using UDCA in PSC are underpowered and fail to show improvements in clinically relevant endpoints, such as delayed progression to cirrhosis, portal hypertension, liver transplantation, development of cholangiocarcinoma, or death.

24-norUrsodeoxycholic Acid Is Superior to Ursodeoxycholic Acid in the Treatment of Sclerosing Cholangitis in Mdr2 (Abcb4) Knockout Mice

Current therapy for primary sclerosing cholangitis is of limited efficacy. Multidrug resistance gene 2 knockout mice (Mdr2(-/-)) represent a well-characterized model for sclerosing cholangitis. Experiments were performed to test in such mice the therapeutic effects of 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid, a C(23) homologue of ursodeoxycholic acid with 1 fewer methylene group in its side chain. Mdr2(-/-) mice were fed a diet containing 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid (0.5% wt/wt) or ursodeoxycholic acid (0.5% wt/wt) as a clinical comparator for 4 weeks; controls received standard chow. Effects on serum liver tests, liver histology, markers of inflammation and fibrosis, and bile acid transport and metabolism were compared. 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid metabolism was studied in serum, liver, bile, and urine. 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid markedly improved liver tests and liver histology and significantly reduced hydroxyproline content and the number of infiltrating neutrophils and proliferating hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid underwent extensive phase I/II metabolism (hydroxylation, sulfation, and glucuronidation), thereby increasing the hydrophilicity of biliary bile acid secretion. There was a coordinated induction of bile acid detoxifying enzymes (Cyp2b10, Cyp3a11, and Sult2a1) and efflux pumps (Mrp3 and Mrp4). Ursodeoxycholic acid, in contrast, increased alanine transaminase and alkaline phosphatase levels, had no significant effects on hydroxyproline content, and induced biliary transporters and detoxification enzymes to a much smaller extent than 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid. 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid ameliorates sclerosing cholangitis in Mdr2(-/-) mice. Its therapeutic mechanisms involve (1) increasing the hydrophilicity of biliary bile acids, (2) stimulating bile flow with flushing of injured bile ducts, and (3) inducing detoxification and elimination routes for bile acids.

Management of extraintestinal manifestations and other complications of inflammatory bowel disease

The past 18 months have seen many studies of the prevalence, pathogenesis, and treatment of the extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha have shown effectiveness in randomized trials for the treatment of spondyloarthropathies and ocular manifestations. Open-label studies suggest that these agents may be effective for pyoderma gangrenosum as well. The epidemiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and its relationship to IBD, is becoming clearer. Colorectal neoplasia in PSC remains an important clinical problem. Osteoporosis occurs more commonly in IBD, but the relative importance of corticosteroid use versus underlying chronic bowel inflammation as risk factors remains controversial. Chromoendoscopy may be an important means to improve detection of colorectal neoplasia in IBD. Observational studies suggest that prolonged use of aminosalicylates is associated with decreased risk of neoplasia, but data are conflicting. A randomized trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in PSC showed decreased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients receiving the drug relative to those on placebo.

Metronidazole and ursodeoxycholic acid for primary sclerosing cholangitis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

No effective medical therapy is currently available for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver enzymes, but its effect on liver histology is controversial. Metronidazole (MTZ) prevents PSC-like liver damage in animal models and reduces intestinal permeability. We recruited 80 patients with PSC into a randomized placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of UDCA and MTZ (UDCA/MTZ) compared with UDCA/placebo on the progression of PSC. Patients (41 UDCA/placebo and 39 UDCA/MTZ) were followed every third month. Assessment of liver function test, histological stage and grade, and cholangiography (via ERCP) at baseline showed no differences between the groups. After 36 months, serum aminotransferases gamma-glutamyltransferase, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased markedly in both groups, serum ALP more significantly in the UDCA/MTZ group (-337 +/- 54 U/L, P < .05) compared with the UDCA/placebo group. The New Mayo Risk Score decreased markedly only in the UDCA/MTZ group (-0.50 +/- 0.13, P < .01). The number of patients with improvement of stage (P < .05) and grade (P < .05) was higher in the combination group. ERCP findings showed no progression or improvement in 77% and 68% of patients on UDCA/MTZ and UDCA/placebo, respectively. In conclusion, combining MTZ with UDCA in PSC improved serum ALP levels and New Mayo Risk Score, but no statistically significant effect on disease progression as assessed via liver histology or ERCP was seen. Long-term studies using a higher dose of UDCA combined with MTZ in larger patient populations are indicated.