Urology Residents Research Articles

Implementation of a Urologic Surgery Skills Fair for Medical Students

To increase the proportion of applicants to urology residencies, we created a surgical skills fair to introduced urology early in undergraduate medical education. Funded by the Department of Urology, the fair was designed to have student rotations through 12 hands-on practice stations supervised by faculty and an advanced care practitioner or resident physicians. At conclusion, medical students completed a voluntary survey about their experience. Surgical skills fairs were organized at Yale School of Medicine (New Haven, CT) in 2022 and 2023. The fair was designed to encourage interaction between medical students, urology residents, and urology faculty by highlighting common urologic procedures and skills. The fair was well received by medical students at all levels of training. Over 2 years, 155 medical students attended, including 67 (43%) first-year and 60 (39%) second-year medical students. Eighty-two medical students completed the survey. An average of 19 attendings, advanced care practitioners and residents attended each event. Of the survey respondents, 42.7% reported prior interest in a surgical specialty but had not considered urology. Students reported increased interest in urology and greater confidence in urologic skills after the event (p < 0.001). We demonstrate that creating a surgical fair in urology is feasible and enhances early exposure and interest in urology. For students who do not pursue urology, the fair provides knowledge of urological pathologies and valuable skills for all physicians.

Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Ureteral Stent Placement.

Currently, there are no validated training models for cystoscopy with ureteral stent placement. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a novel endoscopic simulation model for training in ureteral stent placement. A low-cost, low-fidelity training model was developed to simulate ureteral stent placement. Recruited participants were divided into 3 groups: novices (postgraduate year 3/4 gynecology residents), advanced learners (urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows), and experts (urology residents, urogynecology faculty, and urology faculty). Construct validity was measured using de-identified video-recorded performances on the model, which were evaluated by 2 expert reviewers using validated scales (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills [GOALS], Global Rating Scale [GRS]) and procedure-specific metrics. The model was created using a hollow Styrofoam sphere, plastic tubing from a retropubic sling, and a silicone pacifier. Thirty-six surgeons were assessed performing the procedure using the model with cystoscopic equipment. The experts (n = 12) performed significantly better than the advanced learners (n = 17) and novices (n = 7) in total scores (max 75, median [IQR]: 75 [75-75], 61 [56.5-68.5], 45 [43-46], respectively; P < 0.001) and within each individual scale domain. Increasing experience with ureteral stent placement had a significant correlation (P < 0.001) with better performance on the model. A minimum total passing score of 63 was established. On post simulation assessment, most participants "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the model closely approximates the feel of ureteral stent placement. This ureteral stenting simulation model is easy to construct, affordable, and reproducible. The model is valid and reliable for practicing the procedure in preparation for live surgery.

Estado actual de la formación en cirugía reconstructiva en España: resultados de una encuesta nacional

Introduction and objectiveAssessment of urethral stricture (US) management in a specific group of professionals, Urology Residents, in a specific region (Spain), seems to be important to determine the quality of the educational program and design educational interventions to improve it. We aim to investigate diagnosis and therapeutics practices among Urology Residents for the US management. Materials and methods20-question on-line survey was conducted among residents and junior consultants registered on the mailing list of residents and young urologists of the Spanish Association of Urology (RAEU) group of the educational period 2018-2023. We evaluated demographic, educational, surgical technics and experience data during the training period. 290 questionnaires were mailed between May-August 2023. Data was collected in a prospective way between May-December 2023, with 29,6% response rate. ResultsThe survey obtained 86 responders, with 29,65% (86/290) response rate. Two first sections were answered by all the responders, however, from the assessment section on, only 57 responders completed the survey, which represents 66,28% of them. ConclusionsEducational program in Reconstructive Urology among Urology Residents in Spain has an improvement margin. We must dedicate our efforts to standardize the educational process and facilitate access to formation to and increasing area of interest among residents.

Updated Research Publication Standards and Expectations for Successful Matching in Urology Residency Following Step 1 Scoring Changes.

To analyze the research productivity of 2024 urology residency applicants and its impact on match outcomes following the transition of the Step 1 exam to a Pass/Fail scoring system. We conducted a retrospective review of PubMed-indexed publications for 98 applicants matched to the top 25 urology residency programs, as ranked by Doximity. Metrics such as the number of publications, citations, journal impact factors, and authorship rank were analyzed. Statistical comparisons of publication rates between top-ranked and lower-ranked programs were made using independent samples t-tests. The average number of publications per applicant was 5.95, with those entering top-ranked programs exhibiting higher research outputs. Most publications were found in journals like "Urology" and "Urology Practice." A significant portion of the research was published in the final year of medical school, indicating a push for paper acceptances prior to the urology application deadline date. The increase in research output among applicants reflects the shifting weights of factors important for residency competitiveness following the Step 1 Pass/Fail scoring changes. Early engagement and mentorship in research have been shown to increase the research output of students. The findings of this study clarify the research expectations of matching successfully into a top urology program and can be used by both medical students and program directors in the current and upcoming cycles.

Editorial Comment on "PubMed-Indexed Research Productivity of Urology Applicants and Residents: Does Medical Student Research Productivity Predict Resident Research or Pursuit of an Academic Career?"

Editorial Comment on "PubMed-Indexed Research Productivity of Urology Applicants and Residents: Does Medical Student Research Productivity Predict Resident Research or Pursuit of an Academic Career?"

The impact of single-port robotic surgery: a survey among urology residents and fellows in the United States.

Our aim was to investigate the perception and future expectations of Single-Port (SP) surgery among urology trainees in the United States. A 34-item online survey was distributed to urological residency and fellowship programs across the US, covering demographic profiles, SP training opportunities, perceived educational impact, and future perspectives. Descriptive analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to assess predictors of SP adoption. 201 surveys were completed (28.6% completion rate). Among institutions with an SP platform, about 50% have used it regularly for over 2 years, though often in less than 50% of procedures. While robotic simulators are commonly available, only 17% offer both multi-port and SP simulators, and structured pre-clinical SP training is limited. Approximately 30% of respondents expressed concerns over limited hands-on experience and a steeper learning curve with SP. Around 40% felt that their robotic surgery exposure was negatively impacted by SP's introduction. SP surgery's benefits are seen mostly in the immediate post-operative period and a significant number of respondents foresee a major role for SP in urology. However, proficiency in SP surgery is not seen as crucial for career advancement or job opportunities. Academic job aspirations, SP platform availability, and SP surgery workload are predictors of future SP implementation. Trainees increasingly recognize the clinical benefits of SP procedures but express concerns about the potential negative impact on hands-on experience. Training programs should more systematically integrate SP technology into curricula. There is a correlation between training in high-volume SP centers and future SP adoption.

PubMed-indexed Research Productivity of Urology Applicants and Residents: Does Medical Student Research Productivity Predict Resident Research or Pursuit of an Academic Career?

ObjectivesTo assess the research output of urology residents at top programs and investigate the correlation between medical school research productivity (MRP), research during residency (RRP), and pursuit of academic practice. Further, to characterize trends in MRP before and after the transition to pass/fail scoring of USMLE Step 1. MethodsOur team previously reported on the PubMed-indexed research productivity of applicants matching into top 50 urology programs. Here, we used the same list of residents, recorded their publications during residency, and noted their career paths, including fellowships, academic roles, or private practice. We then highlight the relationship between MRP, RRP, and pursuit of an academic career. We also highlight trends in MRP of applicants matching to top residency programs before and after the transition to pass/fail Step 1 exams. ResultsWe collected data on 727 residents. On multivariate logistic regression, total medical school publications (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97, 1.19), total urology publications (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92, 1.21), and total first author publications (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91, 1.33) were not associated with academic appointment after residency. On the other hand, RRP was correlated with pursuit of academics (1.08, 95% 1.03,1.14). MRP was significantly higher amongst applicants who applied with a pass/fail exam compared to those who did not. ConclusionMRP is not predictive of pursuing an academic career, but RRP is. There is a significant increase in average MRP of those matching to top urology programs after the transition to a pass/fail scoring system for Step 1.

Sexuality of urologist in training: Does cobbler always wear the worst shoes? Sex AFUF study.

Sexuality is an integral part of well-being. Urologists are a population faced with a significant workload and stress that can affect their sexuality. The purpose of this study is to investigate sexuality in this population and assess factors that may impact it. A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and July 2023 among French urology residents and fellows. Data was collected through an anonymous questionnaire sent by the French Association of Trainee Urologists (AFUF) via email. Out of 445 members of the AFUF, 196 trainee urologists responded. Among them, 130 young urologists, accounting for 66% of respondents, were satisfied with their sexual life, and 123 (63%) respondents reported having one or more sexual encounters per week. In univariate analysis, factors significantly impacting the level of sexual satisfaction were gender (p=0.029), level of job satisfaction/well-being (p<0.01), level of professional burnout (p<0.001), and the existence of a romantic relationship. Young urologists are mostly satisfied with their sexual life. Gender, level of job satisfaction/well-being, and level of professional burnout are significant factors impacting the level of sexual satisfaction.

A novel smartphone application for bladder cancer management (BCM App): Design, development, and usability evaluation

BACKGROUND: Providing clinical guidelines to clinicians using innovative technologies seems practical and useful. This study aimed to design, develop, and evaluate a smartphone application to assist urologists in managing bladder cancer (BCM App). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in three phases, following the user-centered design model, at the urology clinic of Khorshid Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) in 2021. Components and functionalities for BCM App were specified in three focus group sessions with urologists and urology residents using clinical guidelines. Adopting the Delphi technique, the participants completed a questionnaire addressing issues including educating and informing clinicians, performing clinical calculations, representing graphical information, and recording patient information. A conceptual model for the app was designed, and the final product was developed. The usability of the BCM App was evaluated using the think-aloud technique by usability experts and end-users. RESULTS: The app’s components were categorized into three groups: Patient evaluation, disease staging and management, and patient follow-up. The app’s main components included “bladder cancer classification,” “disease grading and staging,” “management based on the disease stages,” “principles of intravesical treatment,” and “classifying follow-ups by disease stages.” Moreover, the most prominent app’s functionalities were “using staging and grading table,” “using American Urological Association risk stratification,” “calculating disease stages,” “calculating patient’s follow-up,” and “recording patient information.” The usability evaluation results revealed that the BCM App was at a “highly acceptable” level. CONCLUSION: To design and develop a smartphone app for managing bladder cancer, the involvement of urologists is crucial. Apart from assisting urologists in effectively managing bladder cancer, the proposed app has the potential to enhance residents’ knowledge and streamline their access to evidence.

A needs assessment for simulation-based training in emergency urological skills in Ethiopia.

Urologic emergencies are common and complications from their management are high. Simulation-based education (SBE) is a highly effective training method, allowing trainees to learn both technical and nontechnical skills in a safe environment. Training in the management of urological emergencies is limited in many healthcare settings, so we performed a needs assessment for a urological emergencies SBE course in Ethiopia. This study presents data from a descriptive cross-sectional, survey-based survey of consultants and residents in the Ethiopian surgical community. The survey was disseminated using online Google Forms, through social media (WhatsApp), and to colleagues in the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) via email and social media. One hundred-seven results were received; two were discarded due to incomplete data. Fifty three of the respondents were general surgeons and 38 of the respondents were urologists. Sixty nine respondents strongly agreed that simulation-based training was important for first-year surgical residents, whereas twenty-five respondents agreed and nine respondents strongly disagreed; one respondent disagreed and one was neutral. Eighty seven respondents suggested a 3-day training course, whereas 17 respondents suggested a two-day course. More than 80 of the respondents rated training in the management of acute urinary retention, acute scrotum, urethral, and suprapubic catheterization as extreme or very important and 79 respondents wanted education about urologic trauma and Fournier's gangrene. Surgical and urology residents in Ethiopia have expressed a need for, and a strong interest in, simulation-based urological emergency training.

Theoretical Impact of Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon on Urethroplasty Education Among Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons Fellows and United States Urology Residents.

Theoretical Impact of Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon on Urethroplasty Education Among Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons Fellows and United States Urology Residents.

Does Blacklight Illumination Improve Speed and Accuracy of Foot Pedal Activation in the Low-Light Operating Room?

Background: Urologists frequently activate foot pedals in a low-light operating room (OR). Pedal activation in low-light conditions poses the potential for incorrect pedal activation, potentially leading to increased radiation exposure, patient burns, or OR fires. This study compares speed, accuracy, dark adaptation, and surgeon preference for pedal activation in 4 lighting conditions. Materials and Methods: During a simulated percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), pedals for C-arm, laser, and ultrasonic lithotripter (USL) were randomized to 3 different positions. Urology attendings, residents, and medical students activated pedals in a randomized order in 4 settings: a dark OR with no illumination, an OR with overhead illumination, a dark OR with glowstick illumination, and a dark OR with blacklight illumination. Endpoints included pedal activation time; number of attempted, incomplete, and incorrect activations; dark adaptation; and subjective pedal preference. ANOVA was used for analysis with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: In our study with 20 participants, the mean pedal activation times were significantly faster when using glowstick illumination (6.77 seconds) and blacklight illumination (5.34 seconds) compared with the no illumination arm (8.47 seconds, p < 0.001). Additionally, individual pedal activations for the C-arm, laser, and USL were significantly faster with glowstick and blacklight illumination compared with a dark OR (p < 0.001 for all). The blacklight illumination arm demonstrated decreased attempted (0.30 vs. 3.45, p < 0.001), incomplete (1.25 vs. 7.75, p < 0.001), and incorrect activations (0.35 vs. 1.25, p < 0.001) compared with the dark setting, while demonstrating no difference compared with having room lights on. Dark adaptation was significantly improved with blacklight illumination compared with having the room lights on (134.5 vs. 140.5 luminance, p < 0.001). All participants (100%) preferred illuminated pedals compared with the dark OR, with 90% favoring the blacklight illumination. Conclusions: During a simulated PCNL, blacklight illumination significantly improved accuracy and efficiency of pedal activation compared with the conventional dark OR, while maintaining the surgeon's dark adaptation.

Financial and Business Literacy Among Urology Residents: Is this a Problem and How Can We Better Prepare Residents for their Careers?

Although financial wellness is a predictor of physician burnout, we are yet to optimize financial education or wellness of Urology trainees. We assessed existing studies, compared them to those of other specialties, and discussed resources and methods to address this deficiency. Urology residents tend to be less fiscally savvy (carry significant debt, and lack retirement savings or disability insurance), and 90% of trainees and young Urologists do not feel comfortable with the business of practice, including skills like coding and billing, contract negotiation, and self-value assessment. Financial and business literacy are deficiencies of Urology training, as in other specialties. Eventually, the goal should be universal adoption of a formal curriculum that is graded in nature. In the interim, we need to propose and endorse adoption of a formal curriculum, and we should support trainees by promoting a space for easily accessible and transparent information regarding best practices in personal finance and the business of healthcare.

Sex-specific differences in surgical confidence: results of the Endo Workshop of the German Society of Residents in Urology 2022

Simulation-based training is gaining importance in urologic residents training. This prospective study evaluated the influence of the Endo Workshop of the German Society of Residents in Urology e. V. (GeSRU) on surgical confidence. GeSRU Endo Workshop 2022 included 1 h simulation-based training sessions on stone removal using ureteroscopy (URS) and transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). Using an online questionnaire, surgical confidence was assessed before and after the workshop. Surgical assessment relied on the global rating scale (GRS). Overall, 40residents participated: 25(62.5%) men and 15(37.5%) women. In URS assessment, men vs. women achieved an average of 26.6 vs.26.1/35points on the GRS (p = 0.7) and completed the task in 8.1 ± 1.9 vs.9.9 ± 0.4 min (p < 0.001). In TURB assessment, men vs. women achieved an average of 26.0 vs.27.3/35points on the GRS (p = 0.3) and required 7.6 ± 1.9 vs.7.7 ± 2.2 min (p = 0.9), respectively. Among participants who answered the baseline survey and the evaluation (n = 33), 16(80%) men vs.3 (23%) women had surgical confidence to perform URS before (p = 0.01), and 19(95%) men vs.7 (54%) women after the workshop (p = 0.03). Regarding the performance of TURB, 10(50%) men vs.7 (54%) women reported surgical confidence before (p = 0.1), and 15(75%) men vs.10 (77%) women after the workshop (p = 1.0). An increase in surgical confidence to perform URS and TURB was reported by 9(45%) and 10(50%) men and 9(69%) and 8(62%) women, respectively. Endourologic simulation-based training increases surgical confidence of both female and male residents. Despite comparable surgical outcomes, women approach URS with lower surgical confidence compared to their male counterparts.

Evaluating the Impact of the Standardized Letter of Recommendation on a Successful Match in Urology Residency

ObjectivesTo evaluate the contribution of the SLOR to the likelihood of matching in urology residency by applying a novel scoring system and characterize utilization in the 2022 application cycle. MethodsWe conducted an investigation of all applicants to our urology residency program during the 2022 cycle. We developed a scoring system to assess SLOR strength across all templates. Match outcomes were verified with the Society of Academic Urologists listing. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for factors predictive of a successful match. ResultsOut of 386 total applicants, 239 (61.9%) had at least one SLOR in their application. SLOR utilization was more prevalent in MD applicants, in those with higher Step 2 scores, and in those who matched (p < 0.01). The majority of SLOR scores (66.5%) were above a 3.5/5 in our cohort. Step 1 score, number of research entries, and presence of a SLOR were predictive of successful match. However, a SLOR score of < 3 was strongly associated with not matching (OR 0.021, p < 0.01). ConclusionsThe presence of a SLOR in our cohort overall was associated with a successful match. A poor SLOR score was highly deleterious to an applicant’s chance of matching in urology. Our SLOR scoring system can be used across all letter templates and demonstrates that strength of SLOR can significantly impact an applicant’s chance of matching.

Sustainable residency training in urology in context of current changes in the German healthcare system

Promoting sustainable structures and measures in residency is crucial to meet current and future requirements of the German healthcare system. This process does not only involve the integration of social, ecological, and economic aspects into everyday professional life but also into residency training. Specifically, sustainable structures and measures in residency include initiatives such as structured training curricula, simulation-based training, digital training opportunities, flexible working time models, and gender equality. In addition, consideration of environmental aspects as well as expansion of quality management programs are essential. Aholistic approach that considers both the efficiency and the needs of physicians and their patients is the key to sustainable urologic residency programs. This way, urology will remain an attractive specialty for future generations.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Cost of the Urology Application Process

ObjectiveTo review the self-reported costs of urology residency applications from 2019 to 2023 and examine the impact of Society of Academic Urologists (SAU) policy changes made during the COVID-19 pandemic on these costs. MethodsData from the Texas Seeking Transparency in Applications to Residency (STAR) survey was used to evaluate costs incurred by fourth-year urology residency applicants from U.S. medical schools. Outcomes included median total cost (mTC), interview costs, application fees, and other associated costs, alongside the number of interviews offered and match outcomes. Cost comparisons among surgical specialties were made. Simple linear regression was used to identify cost drivers and cost-outcome correlations. ResultsBetween 2019 and 2023, 522 urology residency applicants responded to the survey. The adoption of virtual interviews and discontinuation of in-person away rotations in the 2020-21 cycle led to a 79% reduction in mTC and a 92% reduction in interview costs. Key cost drivers were the number of away rotations and number of applications submitted. Each incremental away rotation is associated increased cost of $1,490. In the 2020-21 cycle, urology applicants spent on average $2,000 more than their general surgery counterparts. Urology shared the position of most expensive surgical specialty with thoracic surgery and ophthalmology in the 2021-22 match cycle. ConclusionPandemic-related policy changes significantly reduced the costs of urology residency applications, helping to reduce socio-economic barriers. The critical role of away rotations in securing match success, along with their associated costs, highlights equity concerns for students from institutions without home urology programs.

The Effects of a Structured Resiliency Program on Indicators of Burnout in Medical Residents

Because of the well documented burnout and stress experienced by medical residents, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Education (ACGME) has directed training programs to address these issues in their residents. The current study describes a resiliency enhancement program administered to residents from differing residencies. Method: Residents received group-based sessions focusing on awareness of stress reactions, mindfulness, cognitive coping skills and balancing life and work. All sessions were interactive. The training occurred over a 9-month time span. Residents provided informed consent so that data could be collected. The percentage of burnout was calculated based on one indicator (high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, or low personal accomplishment using the Maslach Burnout Scale). Standardized assessment instruments were administered at the beginning (September) and the end of the program (May) to assess the impact of the intervention. Residents were in training at a medium-sized academic medical center. They came from urology, internal medicine, emergency medicine and neurology training programs. Eighteen female and 51 male residents participated. Results: Baseline rates of burnout were as follows: urology residents, 89%; internal medicine, 73%; neurology, 50%; emergency medicine, 22%. There was a significant decrease in perceived stress for the overall group following the intervention. Residents who significantly improved on mindfulness measures also showed significant improvement on resiliency, stress, and personal accomplishment scores. Residents who significantly lowered perceived stress also lowered emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and increased resiliency and compassion satisfaction. Discussion: This study demonstrated that a resiliency enhancement program and data collection after IRB approval is feasible and effective during medical residency. Based on our analysis, mindfulness, and cognitive skills to reduce perceptions of stress seem to be critical components. Future research is necessary to identify elements of the program most relevant to specific residencies.

Practice Readiness? Trends in Chief Resident Case Logs vs Subsequent Case Log Data in Clinical Practice.

Limited information exists regarding the association between resident surgical case experience and subsequent case mix in practice. We compare the case log distribution residents completed during their chief year to those completed by these graduates in their first 2 years in independent practice. Resident chief year case logs from 10 institutions were analyzed across 4 categories of index procedures: (1) general urology, (2) endourology, (3) reconstructive urology, and (4) urologic oncology. Current Procedural Terminology codes for associated index procedures were used to query case log data during their first 2 years in practice collected by the American Board of Urology. Interactions were tested between the trends of chief year case logs relative to trends in practice case logs. Amongst 292 residents, a total of 104,827 cases were logged during chief year and 77,976 cases in the first 2 years as an attending. Most cases completed during chief year were in oncology followed by general urology, endourology, and reconstructive urology. As attendings, most cases completed were in general urology, followed by endourology, reconstructive urology, and oncology. Chief year case logs showed decreasing trends in the median number of case logs in reconstructive urology, endourology, and general urology, while case logs in independent practice noted increasing trends in all index procedure categories over time. Urology residents perform more cases during their chief year compared to their first 2 years of independent practice. Case types completed as chief residents vs subsequent clinical practice also differ significantly. These observations may have implications for residency training, particularly regarding curriculum design.

Professional Burnout and Career Choice Regret in Urology Residents.

High rates of professional burnout and career choice regret among urology residents may increase professional dissatisfaction, shorten career longevity, and exacerbate urology workforce shortages. Understanding the prevalence of and risk factors for burnout may help develop interventions. Up to 48% of contemporary U.S. urology residents experience burnout symptoms, including up to 70% of second-year residents. Among overlapping personal, professional, institutional, and lifestyle risk factors, barriers to accessing medical and mental health care are frequently cited as an important association in residents. Limited intervention studies suggest that providing basic needs, such as on-call meals, and facilitating physical wellness and social engagement among residents may result in sustained reductions in burnout. Urology residents continue to experience high rates of burnout and career choice regret among medical specialties. Evidence-based interventions and sustainable policies that address primary risk factors are urgently needed.