Urinary Toxicity Research Articles

Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review of Treatment-Related Side Effects and Toxicities

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Around half of all cancer patients undergo some type of radiation therapy throughout the course of their treatment. Photon radiation remains (RT) the most widely utilized modality of radiotherapy despite recent advancements in proton radiation therapy (PBT). PBT makes use of the particle’s biological property known as the Bragg peak to better spare healthy tissue from radiation damage, with data to support that this treatment modality is less toxic than photon RT. Hence, proton radiation dosimetry looks better compared to photon dosimetry; however, due to proton-specific uncertainties, unexpected acute, subacute, and long-term toxicities can be encountered. Reported neurotoxicity resulting from proton radiation treatments include radiation necrosis, moyamoya syndrome, neurosensory toxicities, brain edema, neuromuscular toxicities, and neurocognitive toxicities. Pulmonary toxicities include pneumonitis and fibrosis, pleural effusions, and bronchial toxicities. Pericarditis, pericardial effusions, and atrial fibrillations are among the cardiac toxicities related to proton therapy. Gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities are also found in the literature. Genitourinary toxicities include urinary and reproductive-related toxicities. Osteological, oral, endocrine, and skin toxicities have also been reported. The side effects will be comparable to the ones following photon RT, nonetheless at an expected lower incidence. The toxicities collected mainly from case reports and clinical trials are described based on the organs affected and functions altered.

Effect of Prior Transurethral Prostate Resection (TURP) or Laser Enucleation (ThuLEP) on Radiotherapy-Induced Toxicity and Quality of Life in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy.

In our study, the post-radiotherapy quality of life of prostate cancer patients who previously underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is compared to those who had thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and those who had no prior surgery. It also aims to identify and assess risk factors affecting therapy tolerance in this patient group. We analyzed 132 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), including 23 who had prior TURP and 19 who previously underwent ThuLEP. A total of 62% of patients underwent irradiation within 12 months after surgery. We included only patients treated with radiotherapy using the IMRT technique. Changes in patient-reported urinary toxicity were evaluated using the International Prostate Syndrome Score (IPSS) and the quality of life index of the World Health Organization (QoL/WHO-PSS) over a three-year post-radiotherapy period. Patients with prior TURP experienced significant deterioration in QoL and IPSS immediately after irradiation (p < 0.001), whereas those without previous surgery showed both less significant differences in IPSS and QoL scores. In conclusion, patients with previous TURP/ThuLEP differ from those without previous surgery in urinary quality of life and acute and chronic urinary symptom profiles after RT. The surgical technique (ThuLEP vs. TURP) and the time interval to irradiation are crucial factors affecting RT tolerance in acute and late settings. The previously operated patient group reported a significantly longer period of increased symptom burden.

Changes in Bladder Volume During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Patients irradiated for prostate cancer may experience urinary toxicity, particularly if the bladder volume is small. A mobile application (app) that reminds the patients to drink water prior to each radiation fraction may help avoid small volumes. This study investigating bladder volumes during a radiotherapy course is a prerequisite for a prospective trial testing such a reminder app. Frequency of bladder volumes <200 ml and seven potential risk factors were retrospectively evaluated in 72 patients receiving external beam radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer. The mean and median values of the numbers of radiation fractions with bladder volumes <200 ml were 17.8 (standard deviation=12.0) and 16.5 (interquartile range Q1-Q3=7.5-29.5) fractions, respectively. Higher numbers of fractions with volumes <200 ml were significantly associated with pre-radiotherapy bladder volumes <200 ml (p<0.001) and high-risk prostate cancer (p=0.014). The proportion of bladder volumes <200 ml during the radiotherapy course was high and needs to be decreased. Pre-radiotherapy bladder volume and risk level of prostate cancer were significant risk factors for higher numbers of fractions with volumes <200 ml. These results are important for designing a prospective trial.

Image-guided brachytherapy for pediatric bladder and/or prostate rhabdomyosarcoma: toward an increased personalization of treatment.: Brachytherapy in uro-pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma

IntroductionRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue cancer in children. Around 15% of RMS involve the bladder and/or prostate (BP). Overall survival is around 85%. After chemotherapy, patients receive local treatment based on surgery and/or radiotherapy. In recent decades, image guidance and pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy have made it possible to personalize treatment, reduce radiation-related toxicity, while maintaining a good tumor control. We report one of the largest series of image-guided brachytherapy for pediatric RMS BP. Material and methodsThe clinical and dosimetric parameters of children treated with brachytherapy for BP RMS between July 2014 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were treated with a multimodal conservative approach, combining partial conservative surgery (preservation of the bladder neck and urethra), followed by an interstitial brachytherapy procedure. Iridium-192 PDR treatment was administered on the basis of CT and MRI planning. Toxicities were reported according to version 4.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. ResultsA total of 75 patients were identified, with a median age of 29 months (range 2–84) at diagnosis. The median brachytherapy dose was 60.06 Gy (143 pulses, 0.42 Gy/pulse). With a median follow-up of 44.1 months (range 0.7–90), the 5-year OS and PFS rates were 97.3% and 92% respectively. Median D50% for the bladder and D1cc for the rectum were 38.6 Gy and 49 Gy respectively. The 5-year probability of survival without severe late urinary toxicity (grade 3 or higher) was estimated at 78.8% (CI95%: 68.1–91.1). A total of 9.3% of children experienced grade 2 or 3 late rectal toxicity. ConclusionsImage-guided PDR brachytherapy offers a personalized treatment for pediatric BP RMS, with a favorable therapeutic index. No prognostic factors for urinary toxicity have been identified. Multicenter studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to clarify these data.

Tolérance à court et moyen terme d’une radiothérapie prostatique hypofractionnée selon la technique du boost intégré

PurposeThis retrospective study was conducted to ensure that irradiation of the pelvic lymph node areas associated with simultaneous hypofractionated boost to the prostate according to the protocol implemented at the university hospital of Tours (France) does not result in excess urinary and digestive toxicity in the short and medium term. Materials and methodsThe study population included patients with localized unfavourable intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. The dose delivered was 65Gy in 25 fractions of 2.6Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles, and 50Gy in 25 fractions of 2Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes. Acute toxicity events (between the start of radiotherapy and the first follow-up consultation) and medium-term toxicity events (after the first follow-up consultation) were assessed using the CTCAE version 5.0 classification. ResultsSixty-three patients were treated according to the protocol between January 1st, 2020, and October 31st, 2022. The majority of them had high-risk prostate cancer (79%). The median follow-up was 15 months. Very few patients reported grade 3–4 toxicity acutely (6% urinary and 0% digestive toxicity) or in the medium term (7% urinary and 0% and digestive toxicity). ConclusionRadiotherapy of pelvic lymph node areas with simultaneous hypofractionated boost to the prostate is feasible, with low rates of severe acute and medium-term toxicity.

Long-term Results of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Intra-prostatic Boosts in Men With Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Trial

AimsIn the conventionally fractionated phase III FLAME prostate trial, focal boosts improved local control and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS). We explored the toxicity and effectiveness of a moderately hypofractionated schedule with focal boosts. Material and methodsBIOPROP20 is a phase II single-arm non-randomised trial for intermediate- to very high-risk localised prostate cancer patients with bulky tumour volumes. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-choline positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans were used for staging and boost volume definition. Patients were treated with 60Gy in 20 fractions with a boost dose up to 68Gy. Five patients with positive lymph nodes on the PET-CT scan received radiotherapy to pelvic lymph nodes (45Gy to elective nodes, boosted up to 50Gy to involved nodes). Primary outcomes were acute (≤18 weeks) and late urinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, prospectively recorded up to 5 years with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4 (CTCAE). Secondary outcomes were biochemical or clinical progression, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Results61 patients completed radiotherapy with hormone therapy (range: 6–36 months). Cumulative acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity was low at 6.6% and 5.0%, respectively. Cumulative acute and late urinary toxicity was 49.2% and 30.1%, respectively; the prevalence reduced to 5.9% at 5 years. At 5 years: 6 patients had biochemical progression (bDFS: 88.5%; 95% CI: 80.2–97.6%), the MFS was 82.4% (95% CI: 73.0–92.9%), 5 patients died (OS: 91.2%; 95% CI: 84.1–98.9%), one with prostate cancer. The prostate, boost, nodal planning volumes, and the organs at risk (rectum, bowel, urethra, and bladder) met the optimal protocol dose constraints. There was a trend to increased urinary toxicity with increasing urethral (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 0.73–5.22, p = 0.18), but not bladder dose. ConclusionFocal boosts with a 20 fraction hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy schedule are associated with an acceptable risk of gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity and achieve good cancer control. ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02125175.

Outcomes of I-125 Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis from a Specialized Tertiary Referral Center.

Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy with I-125 seeds is one of the most common primary tumor treatments for low-risk and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This report aimed to present an analysis of single-institution long-term results. We analyzed the treatment outcomes of 119 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with LDR brachytherapy at our institution between 2014 and 2020. The analysis focused on biochemical recurrence rates (BRFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative local recurrence rate (CLRR), and the incidence of acute and late toxicities. Patient-reported quality of life measures were also evaluated to provide a holistic view on the treatment's impact. The median follow-up period was 46 months. CLRR was 3.3% (4/119), five-year BRFS was 87%, and the five-year OS rate was 95%. Dysuria was the most common acute urinary toxicity, reported in 26.0% of patients as grade 1 and 13.4% as grade 2. As a late side effect, 12.6% of patients experienced mild dysuria. Sexual dysfunction persisted in 6.7% of patients as grade 1, 7.5% as grade 2, and 10.0% as grade 3. LDR brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer is an effective treatment, with favorable clinical outcomes and manageable toxicity. The low CLRR and high OS rates, as well as low incidence of severe side effects, support the continued use of LDR brachytherapy as a primary treatment modality for localized prostate cancer.

Development of deep learning-based novel auto-segmentation for the prostatic urethra on planning CT images for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Urinary toxicities are one of the serious complications of radiotherapy for prostate cancer, and dose-volume histogram of prostatic urethra has been associated with such toxicities in previous reports. Previous research has focused on estimating the prostatic urethra, which is difficult to delineate in CT images; however, these studies, which are limited in number, mainly focused on cases undergoing brachytherapy uses low-dose-rate sources and do not involve external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In this study, we aimed to develop a deep learning-based method of determining the position of the prostatic urethra in patients eligible for EBRT. We used contour data from 430 patients with localized prostate cancer. In all cases, a urethral catheter was placed when planning CT to identify the prostatic urethra. We used 2D and 3D U-Net segmentation models. The input images included the bladder and prostate, while the output images focused on the prostatic urethra. The 2D model determined the prostate's position based on results from both coronal and sagittal directions. Evaluation metrics included the average distance between centerlines. The average centerline distances for the 2D and 3D models were 2.07 ± 0.87mm and 2.05 ± 0.92mm, respectively. Increasing the number of cases while maintaining equivalent accuracy as we did in this study suggests the potential for high generalization performance and the feasibility of using deep learning technology for estimating the position of the prostatic urethra.

Development of cantharidin/baicalin co-delivery system based on mitochondrial targeting strategy for enhanced hepatocellular carcinoma therapy

Cantharidin (CTD) as a treatment for primary liver cancer are well known, and although structural alteration and nano-delivery are efficient in diminishing toxicity, its urinary and digestive toxicity has hindered its clinical application. Based on the synergistic effect of CTD and baicalin (BA) on proliferation inhibition of liver tumor cells, the highly expressed folic acid (FA) receptor of liver cancer cell membrane and the high negative membrane potential of tumor cell mitochondria, we synthesized CHEMS-FRFK and prepared a dual-ligand modified co-delivery liposomes (FA/FRFK-CTD/BA-Lips). Liposomes were spherical particles with uniform particle size, high encapsulation rate, good stability and no hemolysis. The results confirmed that FA/FRFK-CTD/BA-Lips had good targeting to mitochondria of tumor cells, and its target effect on mitochondria of HepG2 was better than that of Huh-7 cells. Compared with CTD, the cytotoxicity of liposomes on HepG2 is 7.0 times higher, while the cytotoxic effect on normal liver cells Thle-2 is 2.1 times lower. It may be related to increasing clathrin-mediated endocytosis, inhibiting tumor cell migration, arresting cell cycle in G1/G0 phase, and promoting mitochondria-mediated endogenous Bcl-2/Caspase 3 apoptosis pathway. Meanwhile, FA/FRFK-CTD/BA-Lips could alter the pharmacokinetic behavior of CTD and BA by increasing concentrations in vivo, slowing release and excretion, good anti-tumor with no obvious toxicity, and successfully delivered CTD/BA to liver tissue, tumor cells and mitochondria. Therefore, FA/FRFK-CTD/BA-Lips, as a delivery system targeting the mitochondria of liver cancer cells, has promising development potential, and could provide a new strategy for solving the problem of CTD toxicity and the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Reduction of post-radiotherapy urinary toxicity via intrafractional MV-kV prostate location monitoring

We hypothesized that an in-house developed system using MV and kV image guidance (MKIG) to ensure correct prostate positioning during SBRT could potentially avoid unwanted doses to non-target tissues, leading to reduced toxicities. We built a 3D MKIG platform that accurately tracks prostate implanted fiducials in real-time and clinically translated the system to replace a commercial approach, intrafraction motion review (IMR), which only tracks fiducials in the 2D kV views. From 2017 to 2019, 150 prostate cancer patients were treated with SBRT and monitored by MKIG. The motion trace of the fiducials alerts therapists to interrupt and reposition the prostate when displacement exceeds a 1.5 mm threshold. A comparison cohort of 121 patients was treated with the same dose regimen and treatment technique but managed by IMR. Statistics of intrafractional patient shifts and delivery time were collected to evaluate the workflow efficacy. The incidence of grade ≥2 urinary toxicities was analyzed to assess clinical complications. The median follow-up time was 3.7 years (0.2 to 8.2 years). MKIG treatments had more treatment shifts (1.09 vs. 0.28) and a longer average delivery time per fraction (579±205s vs. 357±117s) than IMR treatments. Three-quarters (75%) of shifts resulting from MKIG were ≤3mm, vs. 51% in IMR, indicating that MKIG detected and corrected smaller deviations. The incidence of grade ≥2 urinary toxicity was lower in the MKIG than IMR cohort: 10.7% vs. 19.8% (p=0.047). On multivariate analysis of late urinary toxicity, only high (>7) pre-RT IPSS (p<0.043) and the use of MKIG were selected (p< 0.029). Automated and quantitative MKIG introduced minimal workflow impact and was superior to IMR in localizing the prostate during SBRT, which correlated with a clinically significant reduction in late urinary toxicity. Further clinical testing via randomized trial will be required to validate the impact on outcomes.

Long-term evaluation of the safety of a rectal-prostate spacer, the ProSpace® balloon, in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer

BackgroundDue to the close proximity of the prostate and rectum, rectal toxicity remains a major problem in patient treated by radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. One method of increasing the distance between the prostate and the rectum is to use a spacer implanted into the rectoprostatic space. This report describes the long-term outcomes obtained with a new ballon spacer.MethodsPatients treated with curative radiotherapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, who underwent insertion of the ProSpace® (BioProtect Ltd, Tzur Yigal, Israel) rectal-prostate balloon spacer, were included. The main objective was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of the spacer for OARs. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of ProSpace® balloon placement and to evaluate its long-term therapeutic efficacy and tolerance.ResultsBetween October 2013 and March 2015, 16 patients were enrolled in the Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France. The median follow-up was 85.5 months. From top to bottom, the space created was a mean of 16.3 mm (range: 11–20.5 mm) at the base of the prostate, 12.1 mm (range: 4–16 mm) at the middle and 8.9 mm at the apex (range: 5–15 mm). On average, rectal volumes receiving a dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 50 Gy were significantly lower after balloon implantation: -4.81 cc (1.5 vs. 6.3; p < 0.0005), -8.08 cc (6.4 vs. 14.5; p = 0.002) and -9.06 cc (16.7 vs. 25.7; p = 0.003), respectively. There were significant differences in coverage after balloon implantation: Median V95% (p < 0.0005), median Dmin (p = 0.01) and median V98% (p < 0.001) were higher after balloon implantation. At 5 years, cumulative gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 1 in 6% (1/16 patients). No toxicity of grade 2 or higher was found. At 5 years, no urinary toxicity grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found. The QoL was not deteriorated.ConclusionsThe use of the ProSpace® balloon seems to be well accepted by patients, allowing a double dosimetric gain: a decrease in doses received by the rectum and an improvement in the coverage of the high-risk PTV. The long-term gastrointestinal toxicity remains low and QoL is preserved in all treated patients.

Acute Toxicity and Early Prostate Specific Antigen Response After Two-Fraction Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Using Peri-Rectal Spacing – Initial Report of the SABR-Dual Trial

Purpose: SABR-Dual is a phase III trial with an initial phase-I safety cohort, of two-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) with optional MRI-based focal boost, using peri-rectal spacing, for localized prostate cancer. This represents the initial report from the phase-I non-randomized cohort. Materials and methods: Subjects had favorable intermediate risk (FIR) or low risk (LR) prostate adenocarcinoma, and gland volume <80cc. All underwent radiopaque hydrogel spacer and fiducial marker placement prior to simulation (CT and 3-tesla T2 MRI). The clinical target volume included the entire prostate, and in FIR patients, 1-2cm of seminal vesicle (SV). A 2mm expansion was applied for planning target volume (PTV), and a dose of 27 Gy was prescribed to the PTV-prostate, 23 Gy to the PTV-SV, with an optional 30 Gy simultaneous boost (SIB) to an MRI-defined dominant lesion. Primary endpoint was 3-month patient-reported changes in quality of life based on the EPIC-26, IPSS, and SHIM questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were 6-month quality of life, acute toxicity (using CTCAEv5) and early PSA response. Results: Among the 20 patients in the phase-I cohort, 95% had FIR disease, and 50% received an SIB. At median follow-up of 8 months, a 3-month minimally clinically important change occurred in 1/20 (5%), 6/20 (30%), 2/20 (10%), 4/20 (20%), and 5/20 (25%) in urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. There was a mean increase of 1±5.4 in IPSS and decrease of 1.8±6.5 in SHIM scores. Rates of grade 2 urinary and bowel toxicity 10% and 0%, respectively, with no grade ≥3 toxicities. Mean PSA decrease at last follow-up was 70.4%±17.7%. Conclusion: This generalizable protocol of two-fraction prostate SABR using peri-rectal spacing is a safe approach for ultra-hypofractionated dose-escalation, with minimal acute toxicity. Longer-term outcomes and direct comparison with standard 5-fraction SABR are being studied in the phase-III randomized portion of SABR-Dual.

Clinical Outcomes of 3 Versus 4 Fractions of Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer

PURPOSEMRI-guided brachytherapy (MRgBT) is essential in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. This study compares disease and toxicity outcomes in cervical cancer patients treated with 24 Gy/3 fractions (Fr) versus the conventional 28 Gy/4 Fr. METHODS AND MATERIALSThis retrospective study included 241 consecutive patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation between April 2014 - March 2021. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), distant failure (DF) and G2+ gastrointestinal (GI), urinary (GU) and vaginal toxicity were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death as a competing risk and compared using the Gray's test. RESULTSOf the 241 patients, 42% received 24 Gy/3 Fr and 58% received 28 Gy/4 Fr. With a median follow up of 3.2 (range 0.2-9.2) years, there were 14 local, 41 regional nodal and 51 distant failures in 63 (26%) patients. No significant differences were found between the 24 Gy/3 Fr vs 28 Gy/4 Fr group in 3-year DFS (77% vs 68%, P = 0.21), 3-year cumulative incidence of LF (5% vs 7%, P = 0.57), DF (22% vs 25%, P = 0.86), G2+ GI toxicity (11% vs 20%, P = 0.13), or G2+ vaginal toxicity (14% vs 17%, P = 0.48), respectively. The 3-year cumulative G2+ urinary toxicity rate was lower in the 24 Gy/3 Fr group (9% vs 23%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONCervical cancer patients treated with 24 Gy/3 Fr had similar DFS, LF, DF, GI and vaginal toxicity rates, and a trend towards lower G2+ urinary toxicity rate compared to those treated with 28 Gy/4 Fr. A less resource-intensive brachytherapy fractionation schedule of 24 Gy/3 Fr is a safe alternative to 28 Gy/4 Fr for definitive treatment of cervical cancer.

The safety and efficacy of volumetric modulated Arc therapy combined with computer tomography-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a single institution experience

BackgroundVolumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel form of IMRT, which can deliver more accurate dose distribution and shorten treatment time. Compared to MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy, which is recommended as gold standard imaging for cervical cancer contours, CT-guided adaptive brachytherapy (CTGAB) is more available, more widespread, and more affordable in many centers. This study aims to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and the safety of VMAT combined with CTGAB for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.Methods and materialsThis study retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who underwent VMAT and CTGAB. Clinical outcomes including local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response to treatment evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1), and toxicities including gastrointestinal toxicity, urinary toxicity and hematologic toxicity evaluated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 5.0) were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate LC, OS, and PFS.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 19 months. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) occurred in 68 (66.7%), 24 (23.5%), 4 (3.92%), and 6 (5.88%), respectively. The 2-year and 3-year OS were 89.6% and 83%, respectively. The 2-year and 3-year PFS were 84.2% and 74.3%, respectively. The 2-year and 3-year LC were 90.1% and 79.3%, respectively. The average cumulative D2cm3 in the rectum, the bladder, the colon, and the small intestine were 78.07 (SD: 0.46) Gy, 93.20 (SD: 0.63) Gy, 63.55 (SD: 1.03) Gy and 61.07 (SD: 0.75) Gy, respectively. The average cumulative D90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was 92.26 (SD: 0.35) Gy. Grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities occurred in 4.9% and 0.98%, respectively. 1.96% of patients were observed grade ≥ 4 gastrointestinal toxicities and none of the patients observed grade ≥ 4 urinary toxicities.ConclusionVMAT combined with CTGAB for locally advanced cervical cancer was an effective and safe treatment method, which showed satisfactory LC, OS, PFS, and acceptable toxicities.

Salvage low-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive irradiation

PurposeThe optimal management of locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive irradiation is still unclear but local salvage treatments are gaining interest. A retrospective, single-institution analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity after salvage I-125 low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) for locally-recurrent prostate cancer was conducted in a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients and methodsA total of 94 patients treated with salvage LDR-BT between 2006 and 2021 were included. The target volume was either the whole-gland +/- a boost on the GTV, the hemigland, or only the GTV. The prescribed dose ranged from 90 to 145 Gy. Toxicity was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. ResultsMedian follow-up was 34 months. Initial radiotherapy was external beam radiotherapy in 73 patients (78 %) with a median dose of 76 Gy and I-125 BT in 21 patients (22 %) with a prescribed dose of 145 Gy. Median PSA at salvage was 3.75 ng/ml with a median interval between first and salvage irradiation of 9.4 years. Salvage brachytherapy was associated with androgen deprivation therapy for 32 % of the patients. Only 4 % of the patients were castrate-resistant. Failure free survival was 82 % at 2 years and 66 % at 3 years. The only factors associated with failure-free survival on multivariate analysis were hormonosensitivity at relapse and European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic group. Late grade 3 urinary and rectal toxicities occurred in 12 % and 1 % of the patients respectively.No significant difference in toxicity or efficacy was observed between the three implant volume groups. ConclusionThe efficacy and toxicity results are consistent with those in the LDR group of the MASTER meta-analysis. Salvage BT confirms to be an effective and safe option for locally recurrent prostate cancer. A focal approach could be interesting to reduce late severe toxicities, especially urinary.

Late Urinary Toxicity After Extreme or Moderate Hypofractionated Prostate Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prior Transurethral Resection of Prostate

PurposeTo study the late urinary toxicity in patients with prostate cancer with prior transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and treated with hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy. MethodsPatients diagnosed with prostate cancer, with a prior TURP, and treated with moderate or extreme hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy (MHRT or SBRT), were included in this study. Severity and duration of urinary symptoms observed during serial follow up after at least three months from radiotherapy were graded per CTCAE v5.0 using information from prospectively maintained institutional database. Impact of hypofractionation and other potential contributory factors on cumulative grade 2+ late urinary toxicity was analysed with univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression. ResultsTotal 203 eligible patients were included (MHRT=114, 64-68Gy/25#; SBRT=89, 35-37.5Gy/5#). Median time from TURP to radiotherapy was 10 months (IQR 7-16), similar for MHRT and SBRT. Overall, mean cavity volume was 1.17cc (IQR 0.5-1.35), while in MHRT and SBRT groups was 1.03 cc (IQR 0.4-1.15) and 1.27 cc (IQR 0.5-1.4), respectively. At a median follow up of 37 months, cumulative grade 3 and grade 2 late urinary toxicity was 8.4% (n=17) and 23.2% (n=47) respectively. Grade 3 symptoms were observed at median 29 months (IQR 19-62) after radiotherapy completion, lasting for a median duration of 8 months (IQR 2-14). Hematuria (6.4%) and urinary obstruction (3.4%) were the chief grade 3 symptoms. Multivariable analysis for age, diabetes, pelvic radiotherapy, fraction size, prostate volume, TURP to radiotherapy duration, and TURP cavity volume showed no significant association with late grade 2+ urinary toxicity. Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients with prior TURP and treated with hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy, incidence of severe late urinary adverse effects was <10%, mainly hematuria or urinary obstruction. Most of these were temporary, and no significant contributory factors were identified for late urinary morbidity after TURP and radiotherapy.

Conditional Risk and Predictive Factors Associated With Late Toxicity in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy Alone in the Randomized Trial RTOG 0126

The objective of this study was to characterize the conditional risk of developing grade 2+ urinary or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for patients treated with external beam radiation therapy in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0126. A secondary objective was to analyze baseline patient and treatment characteristics and determine their relevance in predicting toxicity both at the time of trial enrollment and at later points of follow-up. One thousand five hundred thirty-two patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled between March 2002 and August 2008, of whom 1499 were eligible and included in data analysis with a median follow-up of 8.4 years (range, 0.02-13 years). Patients were treated with either 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy according to institutional practice without the addition of androgen deprivation and randomized to receive either standard-dose radiation therapy of 70.2 Gy or dose-escalated radiation therapy of 79.2 Gy of radiation therapy to the prostate only with standard fractionation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether initial factors were predictive of late toxicity at the time of treatment and at later time points. As patients proceed further from completion of radiation therapy without the development of toxicity, the subsequent risk of both grade 2+ genitourinary (GU) and GI toxicity decreases with time. At the time of enrollment, the risk of developing grade 2+ toxicity over the next 5 years was 9.57% and 17.89%, respectively. After 5 years of toxicity-free survival, the risk of developing grade 2+ GU or GI toxicity in the subsequent 5 years was 3.02% and 1.54%, respectively. Baseline treatment and patient-related factors predicted late toxicity both at trial enrollment and after 2 years of toxicity-free survivorship. Baseline urinary dysfunction and dose-escalated radiation therapy were associated with increased late GU toxicity. Acute GI toxicity and dose-escalated radiation therapy were associated with increased risk of late GI toxicity. Treatment with intensity-modulated radiation therapy was associated with reduced risk of either toxicity. The conditional risk of grade 2+ toxicities decreases as patients proceed further from treatment, with most toxicities occurring in the first few years after treatment completion. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics remain relevant at both enrollment and later time points.

Effect of neoadjuvant concurrent three-dimensional conformal chemoradiotherapy with conventional two-dimensional chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Background: Rectal carcinoma is a prevalent clinical condition, and treatment hinges on factors like tumor specifics, staging, grading, and histopathological characteristics. While surgery remains the primary treatment, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, particularly using 3D-CRT, has proven effective in reducing local recurrence rates for locally advanced cases. Alternatively, 2D-RT is considered for neoadjuvant treatment. This study aimed to compare the impact of neoadjuvant concurrent three-dimensional conformal chemoradiotherapy with conventional two-dimensional chemoradiotherapy in the context of locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: In this multicentre quasi-experimental study, 60 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma and clinically confirmed locally advanced rectal cancer, were divided into Group A (receiving oral capecitabine with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) and Group B (receiving the same capecitabine dose with 50 Gy two-dimensional radiotherapy). After surgery within 6-12 weeks, outcomes were analysed. Results: After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, clinical complete response rates were 16.7% in Group A and 10.0% in Group B, with a higher pathological complete response in Group A (10.0% vs. 3.3%). Tumor downsizing occurred in 83.3% of Group A and 73.3% of Group B, and sphincter-sparing surgery was achieved in 73.3% of Group A and 56.7% of Group B. Grade 2 toxicities included anemia (10.0% vs. 13.3%), leucopenia (13.3% vs. 20.0%), diarrhoea (10.0% vs. 16.7%), proctitis (13.3% vs. 40.0%), and urinary toxicity (10.0% vs. 20.0%). Grade-1 toxicities were nausea (20.0% vs. 40.0%), vomiting (20.0% vs. 36.7%), mucositis (56.7% vs. 60.0%), hand-foot syndrome (33.3% vs. 40.0%), and urinary toxicity (43.3% vs. 56.67%), with significant proctitis in Group A (p=0.012). Other toxicities showed non-significant p-values (&gt;0.05). Conclusions: Tumour response was not statistically significant between the patients of concurrent 3D-CRT and 2D-RT Arms. But the patients of 3D-CRT arm showed better response arithmetically. Also, there was an observable significant reduction of toxicities (lower gastrointestinal) in the 3D-CRT arm.

Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for localized prostate Cancer: Efficacy and late urinary toxicity according to transurethral resection of the prostate history

Background and purposeExtreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic alternative for localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Despite the availability of several studies, the toxicity profile of SBRT has not been comprehensively described. This real-world evidence study assessed the efficacy and toxicities associated with this regimen, and potential prognosis factors for genitourinary toxicities. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 141 consecutive patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with CyberKnife™ SBRT, as primary irradiation, at the Oscar Lambret Center between 2010 and 2020. The prescribed dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE (version 5.0). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (cBR) was estimated using the Kalbfleisch–Prentice method. ResultsAmong the included patients, 13.5 % had a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The median follow-up was 48 months. At 5 years, bRFS, cBR, and OS were 72 % (95 %CI: 61–81), 7 % (95 %CI: 3–14), and 82 % (95 %CI: 73–89), respectively. Twenty-nine patients experienced at least one late toxicity of grade ≥ 2; genitourinary (N = 29), including 3 cases of chronic hematuria, and/or gastrointestinal (N = 1). The cumulative incidence of late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2 was 20.6 % at 5 years (95 %CI: 13.9–28.1). Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of TURP was significantly associated with late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2, after adjusting for clinical target volume (Odds Ratio = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.05–8.86; P = 0.04). ConclusionExtreme hypofractionated SBRT is effective for localized prostate cancer with a low risk of late toxicity. A history of TURP is associated with a higher risk of late urinary toxicity. These findings may contribute to the optimal management of patients treated with this regimen, particularly those with a history of TURP.

High-Grade Late Urinary Toxicity Following Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose: To find out the incidence and predictors for late high-grade genitourinary (GU) toxicity following salvage radiotherapy (SRT), we investigated the consecutive patients who were treated with SRT after radical prostatectomy.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent SRT for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy were reviewed. The incidence of GU toxicity was assessed and risk factors for grade ≥2 and ≥3 GU toxicity were evaluated. The STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) guided the reporting of this study.Results: Among the total of 217 patients, 88 patients (40.5%) showed late grade ≥2 GU toxicity. The incidence of late grade ≥3 GU toxicity was 11.5%. The presence of grade ≥2 baseline GU dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR], 6.097; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.280–11.333; p&lt;0.001) and short interval (&lt;1 year) from surgery to SRT (HR, 1.994; 95% CI, 1.182–3.365; p=0.01) were associated with late grade ≥2 GU toxicity. A short interval from surgery to SRT was an independent predictor of late grade ≥3 GU toxicity (HR, 2.975; 95% CI, 1.135–7.794; p=0.027).Conclusions: The incidence of late high-grade GU toxicity was not uncommon after SRT. Thus, care should be taken when we consider SRT in patients with baseline urinary dysfunction and a short interval from surgery to SRT, to determine an optimal treatment strategy with balancing quality of life and oncologic outcome of patients.