BackgroundBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common issue among older men. Diagnosis of BPH currently relies on imaging tests and assessment of urinary flow rate due to the absence of definitive diagnostic markers. Developing more accurate markers is crucial to improve BPH diagnosis.MethodThe BPH dataset utilized in this study was sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Initially, differential expression and functional analyses were conducted, followed by the application of multiple machine learning techniques to identify key diagnostic markers. Subsequent investigations have focused on elucidating the functions and mechanisms associated with these markers. The ssGSEA method was employed to evaluate immune cell scores in BPH samples, facilitating the exploration of the relationship between key diagnostic markers and immune cells. Additionally, molecular docking was performed to assess the binding affinity of these key markers to therapeutic drugs for BPH. Tissue samples from BPH patients were collected for experimental validation of the expression differences of the aforementioned genes.ResultA total of 185 differential genes were identified, comprising 67 up-regulated and 118 down-regulated genes. These genes are implicated in pathways that regulate extracellular matrix tissue composition and cellular responses to transforming growth factor beta stimulation, as well as critical signaling pathways such as AMPK and mTOR. Through the application of various machine learning techniques, DACH1, CACNA1D, STARD13, and RUNDC3B were identified as key diagnostic markers. The ssGSEA algorithm further corroborated the association of these diagnostic genes with diverse immune cells. Moreover, molecular docking analysis revealed strong binding affinities of these markers to tamsulosin and finasteride, suggesting their potential as drug targets. Finally, experimental validation confirmed the expression differences of DACH1, CACNA1D, STARD13, and RUNDC3B in BPH tissues.ConclusionThis study introduces novel immune-related diagnostic markers for BPH and highlights their promise as new drug targets, providing a valuable approach for predictive diagnosis and targeted therapy of BPH.
Read full abstract