Urban Jail Research Articles

Measuring Adaptive Functioning in a Correctional Setting: An Analysis of the Problems in Everyday Living Test (PEDL)

Identifying incarcerated individuals with poor adaptive functioning (AF) is critical to ensuring their safety and preserving their legal rights, particularly when a diagnosis of intellectual disability (ID) is considered. This study examined the utility of the Problems in Everyday Living Test (PEDL) to identify incarcerated individuals with deficits in AF who may warrant further assessment for ID. The sample consisted of 154 incarcerated adults housed in mental health units in a large urban jail. Latent class analysis supported a three-class model consistent with Impaired, Borderline, and Intact groups, which differed in the level of AF and other indicators of ID. A cutoff score of 13 in the PEDL was optimal to identify incarcerated individuals with deficits in AF, possible intellectual impairment, and a history of special education. Study findings provided preliminary support for using a 12-item modified version of the PEDL as a screening tool in correctional settings.

Rapid jail-based implementation of overdose education and naloxone distribution in response to the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundPeople incarcerated in jails are highly impacted by the opioid epidemic, and overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) is an effective strategy to reduce opioid overdose deaths. This study examines barriers and facilitators of fast-track OEND implementation within the jails in the Wave 1 Kentucky counties of the HEALing Communities Study during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsMeeting minutes with jail stakeholders were qualitatively coded using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) as the coding framework. The analysis highlighted the top barriers and facilitators to fast-track OEND implementation within the PRISM framework.ResultsSpace and staffing shortages related to the COVID-19 pandemic, disruptions in interorganizational programming from pandemic-related service suspensions, and a lack of technological solutions (e.g., reliable Internet access) for socially distanced delivery were the top barriers to fast-track OEND implementation. In addition, there were limitations on non-jail staff access to jails during COVID-19. Top facilitators included jail leadership support, the option to prioritize high-risk groups, and the incorporation of OEND processes into existing communications and management software. While the COVID-19 pandemic strained jail infrastructure, jail and partner agency collaboration led to creative implementation strategies for the successful integration of OEND into jail operations. Urban jails were more likely than rural jails to be early adopters of OEND during the public health emergency.ConclusionsUnderstanding the barriers to and facilitators of OEND within jails will improve implementation efforts seeking to curb opioid overdose deaths. Jail leadership support and interorganizational efforts were key facilitators to implementation; therefore, it is recommended to increase buy-in with multiple agencies to promote success. Challenges brought on by COVID-19 have resulted in a need for innovative solutions for implementation.Clinical trial informationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04111939, Submitted 30 September 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04111939?titles=HEALing%20Communities%20Study&rank=1.

Dynamic contact networks of residents of an urban jail in the era of SARS-CoV-2

BackgroundIn custodial settings such as jails and prisons, infectious disease transmission is heightened by factors such as overcrowding and limited healthcare access. Specific features of social contact networks within these settings have not been sufficiently characterized, especially in the context of a large-scale respiratory infectious disease outbreak. The study aims to quantify contact network dynamics within the Fulton County Jail in Atlanta, Georgia. MethodsJail roster data were utilized to construct social contact networks. Rosters included resident details, cell locations, and demographic information. This analysis involved 6702 male residents over 140,901 person days. Network statistics, including degree, mixing, and dissolution (movement within and out of the jail) rates, were assessed. We compared outcomes for two distinct periods (January 2022 and April 2022) to understand potential responses in network structures during and after the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant peak. ResultsWe found high cross-sectional network degree at both cell and block levels. While mean degree increased with age, older residents exhibited lower degree during the Omicron peak. Block-level networks demonstrated higher mean degrees than cell-level networks. Cumulative degree distributions increased from January to April, indicating heightened contacts after the outbreak. Assortative age mixing was strong, especially for younger residents. Dynamic network statistics illustrated increased degrees over time, emphasizing the potential for disease spread. ConclusionsDespite some reduction in network characteristics during the Omicron peak, the contact networks within the Fulton County Jail presented ideal conditions for infectious disease transmission. Age-specific mixing patterns suggested unintentional age segregation, potentially limiting disease spread to older residents. This study underscores the necessity for ongoing monitoring of contact networks in carceral settings and provides valuable insights for epidemic modeling and intervention strategies, including quarantine, depopulation, and vaccination, laying a foundation for understanding disease dynamics in such environments.Top of Form

Hepatitis A Exposure Response and Outbreak Prevention in a Large Urban Jail - Los Angeles County, California, May-July 2023.

Correctional settings provide a high-risk environment for hepatitis A transmission because of the high proportion of homelessness and injection drug use among persons who are incarcerated. On May 30, 2023, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health informed the Communicable Disease Surveillance and Control (CDSC) unit of the Los Angeles County Jail system that a symptomatic incarcerated person had received a positive test result for acute hepatitis A. Upon learning the next day that the patient was a food handler, CDSC staff members identified 5,830 potential contacts of the index patient, 1,702 of whom had been released from the jail. During June 1-12, a total of 2,766 contacts who did not have a documented history of hepatitis A serology or vaccination that could be confirmed from the electronic health record or state immunization registry were identified. These persons were offered hepatitis A vaccination as postexposure prophylaxis; 1,510 (54.6%) accepted vaccination. Contacts who were food handlers without confirmed evidence of immunity and who declined vaccination were removed from food-handling duties for the duration of their potential incubation period. No additional cases were identified. Identifying contacts promptly and using immunization and serology records to ensure rapid delivery of postexposure prophylactic vaccine can help prevent hepatitis A transmission during exposures among incarcerated populations.

Genomic Epidemiology of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in a County Jail.

In the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, correctional facilities are potential hotspots for transmission. We examined the genomic epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) early in the pandemic in one of the country's largest urban jails. Existing SARS-CoV-2 isolates from 131 detainees at the Cook County Jail in Chicago, Illinois, from March 2020 through May 2020 were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing. Contemporaneous isolates from Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, Illinois) and the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) were used to identify genetic clusters containing only jail isolates. Transmission windows were identified for each pair of detainees using the date of the SARS-CoV-2-positive test and location data to determine if detainees overlapped in the jail, within a specific building, or within particular living units during transmission windows. We identified 29 jail-only clusters that contained 75 of the 132 SARS-CoV-2 isolates from detainees; of these clusters, 17 (58.6%) had individuals who overlapped in the jail during putative transmission windows. Focusing on specific buildings revealed that 2 buildings, a single- and double-cell style of housing. were associated with having detainees infected with similar SARS-CoV-2 genomes during their infectious time period (P < .001). Our findings suggest that there was transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the jail, in the setting of extensive importation of COVID-19 from the community. Numerous infection control practices at intake and during incarceration were implemented in the jail to limit viral spread. Our study shows the importance of genomic analysis in this type of settings and how it can be utilized within infection control protocols.

Layered Screening and Contact-Limiting Interventions Are Necessary to Reduce SARS-Cov-2 Outbreak Risks in Large Urban Jails.

Highly transmissible infections with short serial intervals, such as SARS-Cov-2 and influenza, can quickly overwhelm healthcare resources in institutional settings such as jails. We assessed the impact of intake screening measures on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in this setting. We identified which elements of the intake process created the largest reductions in caseload. We implemented an individual-based simulation representative of SARS-Cov-2 transmission in a large urban jail utilizing testing at entry, quarantine, and post-quarantine testing to protect its general population from mass infection. We tracked the caseload under each scenario and quantified the impact of screening steps by varying quarantine duration, removing testing, and using a range of test sensitivities. We repeated the simulations under a range of transmissibility and community prevalence levels to evaluate the sensitivity of our results. We found that brief quarantine of newly incarcerated individuals separate from the existing population of the jail to permit pre-quarantine and end-of-quarantine tests reduced SARS-CoV-2 caseload 30-70% depending on test sensitivity. These results were robust to variation in the transmissibility. Further quarantine (up to 14 days) on average created only a 5% further reduction in caseload. A multilayered intake process is necessary to limit the spread of highly transmissible pathogens with short serial intervals. The pre-symptomatic phase means that no single strategy can be effective. We also show that shorter durations of quarantine combined with testing can be nearly as effective at preventing spread as longer-duration quarantine up to 14 days.

Jail Officers’ Adherence to Traditional Bases of Social Power: Understanding Inmate Control in a Unique Correctional Context

Scholars have investigated the social sources of power that correctional officers embrace as their means of control over people who are incarcerated. However, this work has been conducted with community correctional officers and those working in state prisons, with almost no attention to officers who work in local jails. Jails are distinctive in ways that may be important for the bases of power on which officers may draw, and the current study analyzed data from officers employed by a large urban jail. Jail officers favored coercive power more so and referent power less so than has been reported in prior studies of prison officers. Further, we employed latent class analysis to identify groups of officers and analyzed covariates of the resultant classes. We discuss implications for understanding the exercise of power in local jails.

A randomized control trial of a combined community health worker and re-entry intervention for people with HIV recently released from jail who use substances

IntroductionPeople with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PWH) who use substances are disproportionately involved in the criminal justice system. While HIV viral suppression typically improves during incarceration, these gains are frequently lost after release. We evaluated the impact of a combined intervention (formerly incarcerated community health workers [CHW] plus a re-entry organization; CHW+) on postrelease HIV- and substance use–related outcomes. MethodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of a CHW+ for PWH who use substances, within 30 days of release from a large southern, urban jail. Between February 2019 and August 2021, participants were recruited, enrolled, and randomized to treatment as usual (TAU; passive referral to care) or CHW+. Follow up study visits occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was HIV VL at 6 months; secondary outcomes included 6-month urinary toxicology and high-risk substance use at 12 months. ResultsA total of 31 participants were enrolled who were primarily male (n = 24; 77 %), Black (n = 22; 71 %), unemployed (n = 23; 74.2 %), had unstable housing (n = 18; 58 %), had food insecurity (n = 14; 45 %), and reported their drug of choice was stimulants (n = 24; 77 %). The study identified no significant difference in HIV VL suppression at 6 months (20 % v. 37 %; [CHW+ v. TAU], p = 0.61). We observed improved substance use outcomes in CHW+ v. TAU, including fewer positive urinary toxicology screens for stimulants (40 % v. 100 %; p = 0.01) and a trend toward less high-risk substance use (30 % v. 43 %). The CHW+ group met more basic needs, such as food security [+32 % v. +11 %], housing security [+52 % v. −7 %] and full-time employment [+20 % v. +5 %] compared to TAU. ConclusionsPWH who use substances assigned to a combined intervention of CHW+ after jail release did not achieve higher rates of HIV VL suppression than TAU; however, they had improved substance use outcomes and met more basic subsistence needs. Results highlight the potential of culturally informed interventions to address the competing needs of PWH who use substances after release from jail and call for further development of innovative solutions to successfully bridge to HIV care in the community.

HIV testing in jails: Comparing strategies to maximize engagement in HIV treatment and prevention.

Despite 15,000 people enter US jails yearly with undiagnosed HIV infection, routine HIV testing is not standard. Maximizing the yield and speed of HIV testing in short-term detention facilities could promote rapid entry or re-entry of people living with HIV (PLWH) into care. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of third generation, rapid point-of-care (rPOC) vs. fourth generation, laboratory-based antigen/antibody (LBAg/Ab) testing on the HIV care cascade in a large urban jail during a planned transition. We used aggregate historical data to compare rPOC testing and LBAg/Ab testing in the D.C. Department of Corrections. We examined two time periods, January to August 2019 when rPOC testing was performed, and October 2019 to January 2020 after LBAg/Ab testing began. We calculated monthly rates of HIV tests performed, HIV test results received, HIV test results received among those tested, antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation, and proportion of PLWH receiving discharge planning prior to release. We then conducted an interrupted time series analysis to assess the differences between testing periods. There were 14,237 entrants during the first time period and 7,569 entrants during the second. Transitioning from rPOC to LBAg/Ab testing increased the rate of test uptake by 38.5% (95% CI: 14.0, 68.3), decreased the rate of test results received among those tested by 13.1% (95% CI: -14.0, -12.1), and increased the combined rate of HIV tests performed and results received by 20.4% (95% CI: 1.5, 42.8). Although the rate of HIV testing was greater under LBAg/Ab, PLWH received results immediately through rPOC testing, which is critically important in short-stay enviroments. Increasing rPOC uptake would increase its value and combined testing may maximize the detection of HIV and receipt of results among persons passing through jails.

Reliance on Community Emergency Departments by People Ever Detained in Jail: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Millions are confined in U.S. jails each year, often with unmet health and social needs. After release, many will visit the emergency department (ED). To illuminate their patterns of ED use, this study linked records from all individuals detained at a Southern urban jail over a 5-year period with health records from a large health care system with three EDs. Over half used the ED at least once, and of those who received care at the health system, 83% visited the ED. Jail-involved people made up 4.1% of the health care system's ED users but 21.3% of its chronic frequent ED users. Frequent ED use was associated with more frequent jail bookings and with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance use disorder. Health systems and jails have a common interest in addressing the needs of this population. Individuals with co-occurring disorders should be prioritized for intervention.

United States county jail treatment and care of pregnant incarcerated persons with opioid use disorder

BackgroundStandards of care for pregnant persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) have been published across multiple institutions specializing in obstetrics and addiction medicine. Yet, this population faces serious barriers in accessing medications for OUD (MOUD) while incarcerated. Therefore, we examined the availability of MOUD in jails. MethodsA Cross-sectional survey of jail administrators (n=371 across 42 states; 2018–2019) was conducted. Key indicators for this analysis include pregnancy testing at intake, number of county jails offering methadone or buprenorphine to pregnant incarcerated persons for detoxification on admission, continuation of pre-incarceration treatment, or linkage to post-incarceration treatment. Analyses were performed using SAS. FindingsPregnant incarcerated persons had greater access to MOUD than non-pregnant persons (χ2=142.10, p<0.0001). Larger jurisdiction size and urban jails were significantly more likely to offer MOUD (χ2=30.12, p<0.0001; χ2=26.46, p<0.0001). Methadone was the most common MOUD offered for continued care for all incarcerated persons. Of the 144 jails within a county with at least one public methadone clinic, 33% did not offer methadone treatment to pregnant persons, and over 80% did not provide linkage after release from jail. ConclusionMOUD access was greater for pregnant incarcerated persons compared to non-pregnant persons. Compared to urban jails, rural jails were significantly less likely to offer MOUD, even as the number of opioid deaths in rural counties continues to surpass those in urban counties. The lack of post-incarceration linkage in counties with at least one public methadone clinic could be indicative of broader issues surrounding connections to MOUD resources.

Infectious disease surveillance in U.S. jails: Findings from a national survey.

While infectious diseases (ID) are a well-documented public health issue in carceral settings, research on ID screening and treatment in jails is lacking. A survey was sent to 1,126 jails in the United States to identify the prevalence of health screenings at intake and characteristics of care for ID; 371 surveys were completed correctly and analyzed. Despite conflicting Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, only seven percent of surveyed jails test individuals for HIV at admission. In 46% of jails, non-healthcare personnel perform ID screenings. Jails in less urban areas were more likely to report healthcare screenings performed by correctional officers. Survey findings indicate that HIV, HCV and TB testing during jail admissions and access to PrEP are severely lacking in less urban jails in particular. Recommendations are provided to improve ID surveillance and address the burden of ID in correctional facilities.

Preventing Interruptions in Health Care After Release From Jail.

The burden of illness, especially mental health and substance abuse, among the incarcerated population is a major factor for recidivism. County jails throughout the United States provide health care disconnected to care given before and after incarceration. Although the mental health issues of incarcerated individuals are well managed during incarceration, they have inadequate medical coverage and medications upon release. In partnership with the Philadelphia Department of Prisons, we launched a new initiative to enroll women into Medicaid before release and set up their first doctor's appointments to ensure continuous access to treatment. This article presents a methodology for connection between health care provided while inside a jail and health care given in the community for people returning to communities after incarceration. We describe a process for establishing and reestablishing health insurance while incarcerated and making first appointments in preparation for discharge from a large urban jail.

Hepatitis C Epidemiology in a Large Urban Jail: A Changing Demographic.

Nearly 1 in 3 people with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection pass through the criminal justice system annually; the system is a crucial location for HCV screening, education, and linkage to care. We aimed to (1) determine the prevalence and incidence of HCV antibody positivity and (2) evaluate the demographic characteristics of people with HCV in a large urban jail. We offered universal opt-out HCV testing to any person undergoing a routine blood test at the Dallas County Jail from June 2015 through December 2019 (N = 14 490). We extracted data on demographic characteristics from the electronic medical record and collected data on risk factors from people with HCV antibody positivity. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses. The prevalence of HCV antibody positivity was 16.7%; the incidence was 13.5 cases per 1000 person-years. HCV antibody positivity was significantly associated with older age (P < .001), female sex (P = .004), non-Hispanic White race versus non-Hispanic Black race (P < .001), and being released to prison versus not (P < .001). Among people born after 1965, those who were HCV antibody-positive were more frequently non-Hispanic White and Hispanic women, whereas among those born in 1965 or before, those who were HCV antibody-positive were more frequently non-Hispanic Black men. The high prevalence and incidence of HCV antibody positivity in a large county jail argue for routine, universal HCV testing and prevention counseling in criminal justice settings. Changing demographic characteristics mirror those of the national injection drug use epidemic and shed insight into designing interventions for risk reduction, education, linkage to care, and treatment.

Implementation of a COVID-19 Infection Control Plan in a Large Urban Jail System.

When the COVID-19 pandemic hit the United States, the number of people confined in correctional facilities on a single day numbered 1.8 million. Incarcerated people are at an increased risk of contracting and spreading SARS-CoV-2. Recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on case recognition, management, isolation, and contact tracing are particularly challenging in jails because of the high turnover of incarcerated people. Beginning in late February 2020, the Department of Correctional Health Services in the Los Angeles County Jail system implemented a multipronged COVID-19 mitigation plan that was progressively amended in accordance with local and national recommendations. This plan entailed the creation of housing for people under investigation, SARS-CoV-2 screening upon entry, a mass-testing program, and identification and monitoring of medically vulnerable people. After the identification of the first laboratory-confirmed case on March 29, 2020, predictive models were generated to visualize potential disease spread and gain support for mitigation strategy planning, which forecasted approximately 3300-4600 cumulative cases during a 278-day period. From March 7 through December 31, 2020, the percentage positivity among unique people tested for SARS-CoV-2 was 11.6% (3933 of 33 921 tested). Among those screened at intake, the percentage positivity was 2.0% (502 of 25 702 tested). The ethnic distribution among people with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result was largely representative of the overall jail population, and most people were asymptomatic. A sustainable, multifaceted mitigation plan that relies on collaboration among medical, custodial, and local public health personnel is essential for limiting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection in correctional facilities.

A Comparison Between Rural and Urban Jail Proximities to Inpatient Mental Health Care in New York State.

The authors created a model to examine the distance between jails and inpatient mental health care facilities in rural counties versus urban counties in New York State. Using U.S. census data, the top seven most rural counties and top seven most urban counties were selected for analysis. Results indicate that, overall, urban jails have closer access than rural jails to inpatient mental health care, with the furthest facilities for urban jails being 15.1 kilometers and the furthest for rural jails being 43.6 kilometers. The closest inpatient mental health care facility for urban jails was 174 meters, whereas the closest mental health care facility for rural jails was 0.02 kilometers. Average distance from inpatient mental health care was 4.3 kilometers for urban jails and 26 kilometers for rural jails. Policy implications are discussed.

Jail as a Point of Contraceptive Care Access: Needs and Preferences Among Women in an Urban Jail.

Individuals who are incarcerated in the United States often struggle to access family planning care because of the common practice of jails not providing contraceptives on site. However, less is known about the contraceptive needs and preferences, including the desirability of intrauterine devices and implants, among those who are incarcerated. Cross-sectional, in-person surveys were administered to 148 reproductive-age women (aged 18-48) incarcerated at an urban jail in Utah to identify women's contraceptive needs and preferences while incarcerated. We used summary statistics and logistic regression to investigate relationships between demographic characteristics, the desire to access contraceptive services while incarcerated, and interest in specific contraceptive methods. Surveys indicate a high interest in accessing contraceptives while in jail (73%). Participants who were more likely to prefer access to contraceptive services in jail were also more likely to be interested in the injectable (odds ratio [OR], 4.75; 95% CI, 1.03-21.94), the implant (OR, 8.44; 95% CI, 1.70-41.99), and intrauterine devices (OR, 10.04; 95% CI, 3.46-29.20) than participants indicating no desire to access contraceptive services while in jail. Jails could be an access point for contraceptive methods requiring health care provider intervention in the state of Utah. However, care must be taken due to broader historical legacies of reproductive coercion in carceral settings.

Perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception among women in an urban U.S. jail

ObjectiveGiven incarcerated women's lack of access to contraception prior to, during, and post-incarceration and concerns of potential reproductive coercion in correctional settings, the objective was to explore incarcerated women's perspective of making provider-controlled methods of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) available in an U.S. urban jail. Study designUsing a concurrent mixed-methods approach, we explored contraceptive use and method choice prior to and after incarceration among women detained in a U.S. urban jail. Focus group discussions primarily focused on incarcerated women's perceptions of LARC. ResultsIn the 30 days prior to arrest, 28 of 116 women (24%) were using a non-barrier contraceptive method. Methods of LARC were used the least, and the majority (n = 74, 64%) were not interested in initiating LARC in jail. Concern about the potential side effects of LARC was the main reason for disinterest followed by distrust in correctional health care staffs’ qualifications. Study participants did not reference coercion as a concern. ConclusionsApprehension about the training of health care providers and cleanliness of the detention facility outweighed participants’ concerns regarding autonomy restrictions associated with provider-controlled methods of LARC. Despite limited interest in initiating LARC use while incarcerated, participants supported making all forms of contraception more accessible in jail settings. ImplicationsUnderstanding incarcerated women's reproductive and contraceptive desires, including their perceptions of LARC, will help improve the provision of equitable reproductive health care in correctional settings. Our findings highlight the importance of contextual factors in determining women's willingness to access contraceptive care in carceral settings, if available.

Adult and Child Visiting at Urban Jails: Perspectives on Visitation Experiences and Policies among Visitors and People in Jail

Growth in the US incarcerated population over recent decades has brought a burgeoning body of research on parent-child visitations in correctional facilities. In contrast to this research, which has largely focused on prisons, this study reports survey results from over 900 visitors and incarcerated adults in an urban jail system. We center our attention on the commonality of children visiting jail incarcerated parents, the ways in which a jail system may facilitate or hamper the visitation process, and opinions on potential visiting policy modifications, including the use of video visiting. Implications for jail visitation policies are discussed.

Does incarceration influence patients’ goals for opioid use disorder treatment? A qualitative study of buprenorphine treatment in jail

BackgroundCorrectional facilities increasingly offer medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), including buprenorphine. Nevertheless, retention in treatment post-incarceration is suboptimal and overdose mortality remains high. Our objectives were to understand how incarcerated patients viewed buprenorphine treatment and identify modifiable factors that influenced treatment continuation post-release. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 men receiving buprenorphine treatment in an urban jail. Interviews were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using a grounded-theory approach. Team members constructed preliminary case memos from transcripts, and then interactively discussed themes within respective memos. We established participant ‘typologies’ by consensus. ResultsDistinct typologies emerged based on participants’ post-release treatment goals: (1) those who viewed buprenorphine treatment as a cure for OUD; (2) those who thought buprenorphine would help manage opioid-related problems; and (3) those who did not desire OUD treatment. Participants also described common social structural barriers to treatment continuation and community re-integration. Participants reported that post-release housing instability, unemployment, and negative interactions with parole contributed to opioid use relapse and re-incarceration. ConclusionParticipants had different goals for post-release buprenorphine treatment continuation, but their prior experiences suggested that social structural issues would complicate these plans. Incarceration can intensify marginalization, which when combined with heightened legal supervision, reinforced cycles of release, relapse, and re-incarceration. Participants valued buprenorphine treatment, but other structural and policy changes will be necessary to reduce incarceration-related inequities in opioid overdose mortality.