Uptake Of Evidence-based Practices Research Articles

Uptake of evidence-based practice and its predictors among nurses in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Uptake of evidence-based practice and its predictors among nurses in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Narrative Review of NICU Implementation of Evidence-Based Early Relational Health Interventions.

Early relational health (ERH) interventions in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) buffer infants from toxic stress effects. Implementation science (IS) can guide successful uptake of evidence-based practice (EBP) ERH interventions. It is unknown if implementors of ERH interventions currently use the resources of IS to improve implementation. A narrative review of recent literature on implementation of ERH EBPs was completed to understand (a) which ERH interventions are currently being implemented in NICUs globally, (b) whether clinical implementors of ERH interventions have adopted the resources of IS, (c) existence of implementation gaps, and (d) implementation outcomes of ERH interventions in contemporary literature. Scopus, PubMed, and CINHAL were searched for original research regarding implementation of dyadic ERH interventions using key words related to IS and ERH. For inclusion, ERH EBPs had to have been implemented exclusively in NICU settings, contained data addressing an IS domain, printed in English within the last 5 years. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were distilled for intervention, IS domains addressed, location, aims, design, sample, and outcomes. Eleven ERH interventions were described in the literature. Few studies utilized the resources of IS, indicating variable degrees of success in implementation. Discussions of implementation cost were notably missing. Implementors of ERH interventions appear to be largely unfamiliar with IS resources. More work is needed to reach clinicians with the tools and resources of IS to improve implementation outcomes.

Technical Assistance for Systemic Change: Lessons Learned From a National Technical Assistance Center.

Despite the millions of dollars awarded annually by the United States Department of Education to build implementation capacity through technical assistance (TA), data on TA effectiveness are severely lacking. Foundational to the operationalization and consistent research on TA effectiveness is the development and use of standardized TA core competencies, practices, and structures. Despite advances toward a consistent definition of TA, a gap still exists in understanding how these competencies are used within an operationalized set of TA practices to produce targeted outcomes at both individual and organizational levels to facilitate implementation of evidence-based practices. The current article describes key insights derived from the evaluation of an operationalized set of TA practices used by a nationally funded TA center, the State Implementation & Scaling Up of Evidence Based Practices (SISEP) Center. The TA provided by the Center supports the uptake of evidence-based practices in K-12 education for students with disabilities. Lessons learned include: (1) the need to understand the complexities and dependencies of operationalizing TA both longitudinally and at multiple levels of the system (state, regional, local); (2) the relative importance of building general and innovation-specific capacity for implementation success; (3) the value of using a co-design and participatory approach for effective TA delivery; (4) the need to develop TA providers' educational and implementation fluency across areas and levels of the system receiving TA; and (5) the need to ensure coordination and alignment of TA providers from different centers. Gaining an understanding into optimal TA practices will not only provide clarity of definition fundamental to TA research, but it will also inform the conceptual framing and practice of TA.

Do no harm: the impact of implementing cancer prevention strategies on other preventive health measures

BackgroundTranslational efforts to increase uptake of evidence-based practices typically look at those outcomes in isolation of their impact on other aspects of care delivery. If we are in fact to “do no harm”, we must consider the possible negative impact of improving use of one practice on other quality measures. Alternatively, a focus on one practice could lead to spread of effective strategies to other practices, which would be highly beneficial. We studied the impact of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiative on delivery of other preventive care measures.MethodsWe used an interrupted time series design with implementation year as the interruption point. The initiative was conducted between 2015 and 2020, with three staggered cohorts. Main outcomes were quality measures for colorectal cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, hypertension management, diabetes management, weight screening and follow-up, tobacco use screening and cessation treatment, and depression screening and follow-up.ResultsThe initiative was associated with an increase in CRC screening (OR = 1.67, p ≤ 0.01; average marginal effect = 12.2% points), and did not reduce performance on other quality measures in the year of CRC program implementation or a change in their respective secular trends.ConclusionsThe initiative led to a clinically meaningful increase in CRC screening and was not associated with reductions in delivery of six other preventive services. Quality improvement (QI) initiatives typically approach implementation with an eye towards reducing unintended impact and leveraging existing staff and resources. Implementation research studies may benefit from considering how QI initiatives factor in the local context in implementation efforts.

Reframing Fall Prevention and Risk Management as a Chronic Condition Through the Lens of the Expanded Chronic Care Model: Will Integrating Clinical Care and Public Health Improve Outcomes?

Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among adults aged 65 years and older (older adults) and are increasingly recognized as a chronic condition. Yet, fall-related care is infrequently provided in a chronic care context despite fall-related death rates increasing by 41% between 2012 and 2021. One of the many challenges to addressing falls is the absence of fall-focused chronic disease management programs, which improve outcomes of other chronic conditions, like diabetes. Policies, information systems, and clinical-community connections help form the backbone of chronic disease management programs, yet these elements are often missing in fall prevention. Reframing fall prevention through the Expanded Chronic Care Model (ECCM) guided by implementation science to simultaneously support the uptake of evidence-based practices could help improve the care of older adults at risk for falling. The ECCM includes seven components: (1) self-management/develop personal skills, (2) decision support, (3) delivery system design/re-orient health services, (4) information systems, (5) build healthy public policy, (6) create supportive environments, and (7) strengthen community action. Applying the ECCM to falls-related care by integrating health care delivery system changes, community resources, and public policies to support patient-centered engagement for self-management offers the potential to prevent falls more effectively among older adults.

Leveraging human-centered design and causal pathway diagramming toward enhanced specification and development of innovative implementation strategies: a case example of an outreach tool to address racial inequities in breast cancer screening

BackgroundImplementation strategies are strategies to improve uptake of evidence-based practices or interventions and are essential to implementation science. Developing or tailoring implementation strategies may benefit from integrating approaches from other disciplines; yet current guidance on how to effectively incorporate methods from other disciplines to develop and refine innovative implementation strategies is limited. We describe an approach that combines community-engaged methods, human-centered design (HCD) methods, and causal pathway diagramming (CPD)—an implementation science tool to map an implementation strategy as it is intended to work—to develop innovative implementation strategies.MethodsWe use a case example of developing a conversational agent or chatbot to address racial inequities in breast cancer screening via mammography. With an interdisciplinary team including community members and operational leaders, we conducted a rapid evidence review and elicited qualitative data through interviews and focus groups using HCD methods to identify and prioritize key determinants (facilitators and barriers) of the evidence-based intervention (breast cancer screening) and the implementation strategy (chatbot). We developed a CPD using key determinants and proposed strategy mechanisms and proximal outcomes based in conceptual frameworks.ResultsWe identified key determinants for breast cancer screening and for the chatbot implementation strategy. Mistrust was a key barrier to both completing breast cancer screening and using the chatbot. We focused design for the initial chatbot interaction to engender trust and developed a CPD to guide chatbot development. We used the persuasive health message framework and conceptual frameworks about trust from marketing and artificial intelligence disciplines. We developed a CPD for the initial interaction with the chatbot with engagement as a mechanism to use and trust as a proximal outcome leading to further engagement with the chatbot.ConclusionsThe use of interdisciplinary methods is core to implementation science. HCD is a particularly synergistic discipline with multiple existing applications of HCD to implementation research. We present an extension of this work and an example of the potential value in an integrated community-engaged approach of HCD and implementation science researchers and methods to combine strengths of both disciplines and develop human-centered implementation strategies rooted in causal perspective and healthcare equity.

Describing nurses' communication about evidence-based practice change: A social network analysis of hospital nurses.

Nurses play a critical role in providing evidence-based, high-quality care to optimize patient outcomes. Models from implementation science suggest social networks may influence the adoption of evidence-based practices (EBPs). However, few studies have examined this relationship among hospital nurses. Social network analysis (SNA) mathematically evaluates patterns of communication, a critical step in implementation. Exploring hospital nurses' communication networks may provide insight into influences on the adoption of EBPs. This study aimed to describe complete communication networks of hospital nurses for practice changes on inpatient units, including upper level nursing administrators. This descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional study used SNA on two inpatient units from one hospital. A sociometric survey was completed by nurses (unit to executive level) regarding communication frequency about practice changes. Network-level density, diameter, average path length, centralization, and arc reciprocity were measured. Attribute data were used to explore subnetworks. Surveys from 148 nurses on two inpatient adult intensive care units (response rates 90% and 98%) revealed high communication frequency. Network measures were similar across the two units and among subnetworks. Analysis identified central (charge nurses and nurse leaders) and peripheral members of the network (new-to-practice nurses). Subnetworks aligned with the weekend and shift worked. Established communication channels, including subnetworks and opinion leaders, should be used to maximize and optimize implementation strategies and facilitate the uptake of EBPs. Future work should employ SNA to measure the impact of communication networks on promoting the uptake of EBP and to improve patient outcomes.

Virtual facilitation best practices and research priorities: a scoping review

BackgroundFacilitation is an implementation strategy that supports the uptake of evidence-based practices. Recently, use of virtual facilitation (VF), or the application of facilitation using primarily video-based conferencing technologies, has become more common, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. Thorough assessment of the literature on VF, however, is lacking. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe conceptual definitions of VF, evaluate the consistency of terminology, and recommend “best” practices for its use as an implementation strategy.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review to identify literature on VF following the PRISMA-ScR guidance. A search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was conducted in June 2022 for English language articles published from January 2012 through May 2022 and repeated in May 2023 for articles published from January 2012 through April 2023. Identified articles, including studies and conference abstracts describing VF, were uploaded into Covidence and screened independently by two reviewers. Data extraction was done by two reviewers in Microsoft Excel; additionally, studies were evaluated based on the Proctor et al. (2013) reporting guidelines for specifying details of implementation strategies.ResultsThe search strategy identified 19 articles. After abstract and full-text screening, eight studies described by 10 articles/abstracts were included in analysis. Best practices summarized across studies included (1) stakeholder engagement, (2) understanding the recipient’s organization, (3) facilitator training, (4) piloting, (5) evaluating facilitation, (6) use of group facilitation to encourage learning, and (7) integrating novel tools for virtual interaction. Three papers reported all or nearly all components of the Proctor et al. reporting guidelines; justification for use of VF was the most frequently omitted.ConclusionsThis scoping review evaluated available literature on use of VF as a primary implementation strategy and identified significant variability on how VF is reported, including inconsistent terminology, lack of details about how and why it was conducted, and limited adherence to published reporting guidelines. These inconsistencies impact generalizability of these methods by preventing replicability and full understanding of this emerging methodology. More work is needed to develop and evaluate best practices for effective VF to promote uptake of evidence-based interventions.Trial registrationN/A.

IMPROVING NURSING HOME DISASTER READINESS THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE

Abstract The new investigation on the state of emergency preparedness in nursing homes from the Senate Finance and Aging Committee Chairs is a call to action. As large-scale disasters continue to become increasingly common worldwide, nursing homes, whose residents are more vulnerable to disaster-related health and psychosocial shocks, and their staff, are carrying progressively more responsibility for healthcare readiness practices. Implementation science is a research discipline that seeks to improve uptake of evidence-based practices, such as healthcare readiness planning, and thus has potential to improve nursing home care delivery during and after disasters. The purpose of this review was to describe the limited field of existing evidence-based strategies in the peer-reviewed literature that seek to advance healthcare readiness in the nursing home setting and illustrate how implementation science can better support healthcare readiness planning for nursing homes. We discuss three main themes: 1) implementation science frameworks can strengthen nursing home staff engagement around healthcare readiness; 2) implementation science can support tailoring of emergency preparedness plans to individual nursing homes’ unique needs; and 3) implementation science can advance the integration of nursing homes into local, state, and federal healthcare readiness planning initiatives. Finally, research is urgently needed to both generate and disseminate implementation strategies that increase uptake of evidence-based health care readiness practices in the nursing home setting.

Clinical Consultation During a Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Community-Based Learning Collaborative: Examination of Consultation Content, Consultative Strategies, and Provider Engagement

Consultation following evidence-based practice (EBP) training enhances the uptake of EBPs. Yet, little is known about what occurs during consultation, and it is often difficult for providers to engage in consultation. This study examined provider engagement in consultation and the content and strategies used during consultation following training in Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) as part of a community-based learning collaborative (CBLC). Minute-to-minute live coding of consultation calls revealed most content was clinically-oriented and the most common strategies used by consultants were didactic in nature. Providers with more years of professional experience and those with greater TF-CBT knowledge attended significantly more consultation calls. Providers with a greater average weekly caseload and providers who were supervisors presented significantly more cases on calls. Providers with greater TF-CBT knowledge spoke significantly more minutes on calls. Consistent with previous work, findings highlight difficulties with provider engagement in consultation and that providers with more baseline expertise are most likely to be engaged. Findings suggest tailoring EBP training efforts to better engage providers at greatest risk for low engagement.

Quality improvement collaboratives as part of a quality improvement intervention package for preterm births at sub-national level in East Africa: a multi-method analysis

BackgroundQuality improvement collaboratives (QIC) are an approach to accelerate the spread and impact of evidence-based interventions across health facilities, which are found to be particularly successful when combined with other...

The Price of Practice Change: Assessing the Cost of Integrating Research Findings Into Clinical Practice.

Clinicians, health care administrators, and implementation scientists know that it takes intentional effort, resources, and implementation strategies to integrate research findings into routine clinical practice. An oft-cited concern for those considering whether and how to implement an evidence-based program is how much it will cost to implement the change. Yet information about the cost of implementation is not often available to health care decision-makers. Teams that received Implementation Award funding from PCORI are conducting implementation projects to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in health care settings. As part of their implementation efforts, a number of teams have examined the costs of implementation. In this Topical Collection, 5 teams will report their findings on implementation costs and discuss their methods for data collection and analysis. The teams' costing efforts provide specific information about the costs sites can expect to incur in promoting the uptake of specific evidence-based programs. In addition, the papers illuminate 3 key features of the teams' approaches to measuring the cost of implementation: (1) the use of specific micro-costing methods with time-driven activity-based costing serving as the most popular method; (2) different ways to categorize and organize costs, including a site-based and non-site-based framework; and (3) cost collection challenges experienced by the teams. The cost of implementation is a critical consideration for organizations seeking to improve practice in accordance with research findings. This Topical Collection describes detailed approaches to providing this type of cost information and highlights insights to be gained from a rigorous focus on implementation cost.

Increasing consumer engagement: tools to engage service users in quality improvement or implementation efforts.

Engaging service users or consumers in quality improvement or implementing a new service is important across settings and may reduce health inequities. Implementation strategies leveraging consumer engagement are neither commonly used nor robustly operationalized in implementation science. Implementers (e.g., middle managers, facilitators) want to involve consumers in implementation activities, but do not always feel confident in how to proceed. We developed a compendium of tools called Consumer Voice to guide others how to engage consumers in design/delivery of implementation strategies. Although generalizable to other settings, we developed Consumer Voice within the context of implementing suicide prevention treatments in healthcare to reach rural U.S. military veterans, as there are suicide inequities for people in rural areas. We developed Consumer Voice using a multistep process and human-centered design methods. In between steps, a design team met to generate insights from data, and decide which prototypes to create/refine. In preliminary work, we conducted a scan of examples in healthcare of patient engagement in implementation activities and interviewed two implementation experts about preferred learning styles. In Step 1, we interviewed 26 participants with experience in community engagement, implementation, or lived experience as a rural U.S. veteran with suicidal thoughts/behavior. In Step 2, 11 implementers beta tested prototypes then share feedback in focus groups. In Step 3, we reconvened participants from prior steps to review tools and, using nominal group technique, prioritized remaining recommendations. Consumer Voice is online, modular, and nonlinear for self-guided learning tailored to beginner, intermediate, or advanced experience with consumer engagement. Tools consist of slides, audiovisual content with written text, and templates. Findings indicated there is not one "right" way to engage consumers in implementation activities, rather that implementers wanted tools showcasing core principles for consumer engagement and practical ideas. Consumer Voice can be used by implementers to reflect and decide on how to apply consumer engagement implementation strategies to improve equitable dissemination and uptake of evidence-based practices. Most insights generated by user data were explicitly to build trust between consumers and professionals representing institutions, which may be one component to reducing healthcare inequities.

Should we give patients what they want? Patient expectations and financial pressures need to be addressed to increase uptake of evidence-based practice

Contextual factors such as patient expectations and financial pressures are overlooked challenges for Physiotherapists (PTs) and other rehabilitation professionals trying to implement evidence-based practice (EBP), particularly in private practice settings. In today's hypercompetitive pain management market, PTs may risk detrimental impacts to their reputation and livelihood if they do not give patients what they want, even if what they want does not align with clinical guidelines and research evidence. The aim of this professional practice paper is to shed light on these real-world challenges and encourage discussion among the PT community about strategies to increase uptake of EBP that involve multiple stakeholders such as PT training programs, professional organizations, researchers and clinic owners, which all have a role to play in supporting the translation of evidence into practice in our profession.

LM Initiative Success at the Institutional Level Through the RE-AIM Approach: 12 Tips and Implementation Science Strategies

Transforming research into practice via implementation science may improve institution-wide implementation success rates for lifestyle medicine (LM). Implementation science (IS) is the study of methods that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice and research into regular use by practitioners and policymakers. Multiple IS frameworks, such as the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance/Practical Robust Implementation Strategy Model (RE-AIM/PRISM) model, Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model, and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) model, have been developed. IS frameworks provide a strong yet adaptable foundation for launching initiatives, minimizing barriers by challenging implementers to identify and address problems that impede implementation, and promoting long-term sustainability and positive outcomes. The trouble-shooting tips provided in this article are strategically aligned with the RE-AIM/PRISM model of IS to maximize the likelihood of implementation success within the LM space. These tips provide guidance on how to effectively implement interventions, sustain their delivery, and avoid or overcome barriers to implementation. This article presents 12 tips intended as a list of options to facilitate the implementation phases of an initiative, as opposed to offering an all-or-nothing approach to implementation strategy. Current IS priorities emphasize system change and sustainability, which are essential components of successful implementation of LM initiatives.

The use of theories, models, and frameworks to inform the uptake of evidence-based practices in veterinary medicine - a scoping review

Evidence-based practices (EBPs) provide strategies to improve the health, welfare and productivity of animal species. However, ensuring implementation and uptake into routine practice of these EBPs is often challenging. In human health research, one approach used to improve uptake of EBPs is the use of theories, models and/or frameworks (TMFs), however the extent of the use of this approach in veterinary medicine is unknown. The aim of this scoping review was to identify existing veterinary uses of TMFs to inform the uptake of EBPs, and to understand the focus of these applications. Searches were conducted in CAB Abstracts, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, alongside grey literature, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. The search strategy consisted of a list of known existing TMFs that have been used to improve uptake of EBPs in human health, alongside more generic terminology for implementation and terminology relevant to veterinary medicine. Peer reviewed journal articles and grey literature detailing the use of a TMF to inform uptake of EBP(s) in a veterinary context were included. The search identified 68 studies that met the eligibility criteria. Included studies represented a diverse spread of countries, areas of veterinary concern and EBP. A range of 28 different TMFs were used, although the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) predominated, featuring in 46% of included studies (n = 31). The majority of studies (n = 65, 96%) utilised a TMF with the aim to understand and/or explain what influences implementation outcomes. Only 8 studies (12%) reported the use of a TMF alongside/in conjunction with the actual implementation of an intervention. It is clear there has been some use to date of TMFs to inform uptake of EBPs in veterinary medicine, however it has been sporadic. There has been a heavy reliance on usage of the TPB and other similar classic theories. This has typically been to inform the understanding of factors, such as barriers and facilitators, that may influence the outcome of an implementation effort without then applying this knowledge to the actual implementation of an intervention. Furthermore, there has been a lack of acknowledgement of wider contextual factors and consideration of sustainability of interventions. There is clear potential to increase and expand the usage of TMFs to improve uptake of EBPs in veterinary medicine, including utilising a wider range of TMFs and developing interdisciplinary collaborations with human implementation experts.

Communicating Research Evidence within the Therapeutic Space: A Competency Framework for Graduate Social Work Education

ABSTRACT Although social work, as a profession, has increasingly emphasized the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP), social work students do not consistently learn to infuse EBP as a process in their daily practice, contributing to low EBP uptake in the field. Communicating evidence to clients is an ethical imperative for informed consent and a precondition for shared decision-making; however, students are not adequately trained to talk to clients about research evidence as part of intervention planning and contracting. This article describes the development of a competency framework for communicating research evidence within the therapeutic relationship, in support of a teaching and learning innovation aimed at cultivating holistic competence in Master of Social Work students as they learn about and perform EBP. The competency framework draws on models and practices from social work, medicine, nursing, psychology, and related disciplines. The development of competencies in the communicative process within EBP is part of an evolving pedagogical approach that may serve to enhance EBP education in social work.

Development and validation of the global assessment of the evidence implementation environment [GENIE] tool

BackgroundOvercoming the various barriers to evidence implementation is critical to delivering evidence-based health care. Identifying and managing these obstacles is somewhat challenging however, due to interprofessional and interjurisdictional variations in reported barriers. An efficient, systematic, comprehensive and innovative approach to isolating the barriers to evidence implementation is therefore needed. Materials and methodsUsing a mixed methods design, the study aimed to develop, refine and validate a tool to assess the evidence implementation environment for complementary medicine (CM) professions. The tool was developed using a five-stage process, and refined and validated using a two-round e-Delphi technique. ResultsInformed by reviews examining the barriers and enablers to evidence implementation in CM, and shaped by the Behaviour Change Wheel Framework, a preliminary 33-item tool was created (i.e. the Global Assessment of the Evidence Implementation Environment [GENIE] tool). A two-round Delphi technique was used to refine the criteria, with a panel of 23 experts agreeing to the removal of two criteria, and the addition of two items. In the end, the Delphi panel reached consensus on 33 criteria, which were sorted into nine stakeholder groups. ConclusionThis study has for the first time, created an innovative tool to assess the capacity and capability of CM professions to engage in evidence-based practice at an optimal level. By assessing the evidence implementation environment of CM professions, the GENIE tool is able to determine where resources, infrastructure and personnel should be directed in order to optimise the uptake of evidence-based practices within CM professions.

Implementation science for quality improvement in pediatric surgery

Despite the widespread integration of quality improvement principles into pediatric surgical practice, the actual adoption of evidence-based practices continues to be a challenge. The field of pediatric surgery, in particular, has been slow to adopt clinical pathways and protocols that lead to decreased practice variation and improved clinical outcomes. This manuscript provides an introduction to how implementation science principles into quality improvement efforts may optimize uptake of evidence-based practices, ensure success of these endeavors, and help assess the effectiveness of the interventions. Examples of implementation science application to pediatric surgical quality improvement endeavors are explored.

Improving Nursing Home Disaster Readiness Through Implementation Science

As large-scale disasters continue to become increasingly common worldwide, nursing homes, whose residents are more vulnerable to disaster-related health and psychosocial shocks, and their staff, are carrying progressively more responsibility for health care readiness practices. Implementation science is a research discipline that seeks to improve uptake of evidence-based practices, such as health care readiness planning, and thus has potential to improve nursing home care delivery during and after disasters. We describe the limited field of existing evidence-based strategies in the peer-reviewed literature that seek to advance health care readiness in the nursing home setting and illustrate how implementation science can better support health care readiness planning for nursing homes. We rest on 3 main themes: (1) implementation science frameworks can strengthen nursing home staff engagement around health care readiness; (2) implementation science can support tailoring of emergency preparedness plans to individual nursing homes’ unique needs; and (3) implementation science can advance the integration of nursing homes into local, state, and federal health care readiness planning initiatives. Finally, research is urgently needed to both generate and disseminate implementation strategies that increase uptake of evidence-based health care readiness practices in the nursing home setting.