Uptake Of Advance Care Planning Research Articles

Interventions aiming to improve advance care planning uptake in oncology: a scoping review of recent randomized controlled trials.

The evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions aiming to improve ACP uptake appears mixed. The purpose of this scoping review is to summarize findings from recent RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions designed to increase ACP uptake in cancer care. The PubMed database was searched for studies published between 2021 and 2023. Ten RCTs were identified that evaluated a wide range of interventions aimed at encouraging or facilitating ACP communication among patients with advanced cancer, caregivers, and HCPs. Three RCTs developed ACP facilitation tools for patients and sometimes caregivers. Six RCTs involved integrating trained ACP facilitators into patient care, and one RCT used nudges to encourage oncologists trained in ACP discussions to initiate discussions with patients at highest risk of short-term mortality. Most of the reviewed interventions were based on previously tested intervention approaches or tools. The key effects identified in this review are the facilitation of ACP discussions among patients, caregivers, and HCPs, and the documentation of patient preferences in the medical record. The direct involvement of facilitators in ACP document drafting and inclusion in patient files, as well as interventions prompting end-of-life discussions, contributed to this effect.

Incorporating advance care planning in dementia care.

Recent policy focus in dementia care has been on living well with the condition; however, being able to die well with dementia is of equal importance. Advance care planning (ACP) enables people to consider, express and record their wishes and preferences for palliative and end of life care, however there is a low uptake of ACP in people with dementia. Although ACP discussions should be initiated as soon as possible after a diagnosis of dementia, there are other opportunities and transition points in the person's care during which health and social care professionals could promote, engage in and support ACP discussions. This article considers the importance of ACP in dementia care and uses a case study to explore opportunities for initiating and engaging in ACP with people with dementia.

HETEROGENOUS EFFECTS OF MEDICARE BENEFIT FOR ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONVERSATION BY SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS

Abstract Background Although Medicare makes the option of physician-patient advance care planning (ACP) discussion available to everyone starting in 2016, older adults from disadvantaged backgrounds may be less likely to benefit from the policy. Motivated by Fundamental Cause Theory, this study examines the heterogenous policy effect, as a natural experiment, on older adults’ ACP uptake. Methods Data were from Health and Retirement Study 2012-2020 with 15,647 individuals. I used two quasi-experimental models – interrupted time series (ITS) analysis and difference-in-difference (DID) – to study ACP outcomes before and after the policy implementation between older adults who were Medicare-eligible and those who weren’t. I studied the heterogenous effects in stratified samples by race/ethnicity, immigration background, and socioeconomic status. I used coarsened exact matching to address the potential bias that the comparison group is not the ideal counterfactual control unit. Results DID reveals that, in the total population, Medicare expansion was associated with a significant increase (0.05 percentage point) in the proportion of older adults who completed advance directives, but not for having informal conversations. Furthermore, I find no evidence that the Medicare expansion was effective in improving the rates of ACP among Black, Hispanic, Asian or Native American, or non-US-born older adults. Lastly, based on ITS results, the policy only has significant immediate policy effects (level change) on ACP uptake, but not for sustained effects (slope change). Discussions: The current policy reproduced the disparities in ACP. I discuss health policy recommendations to improve the ACP rate among older adults with disadvantaged backgrounds.

Deployment of a Digital Advance Care Planning Platform at an Accountable Care Organization.

Advance care planning (ACP), a process of sharing one's values and preferences for future medical treatments, can improve quality of life, reduce loved ones' anxiety, and decrease unwanted medical utilization and costs. Despite benefits to patients and health care systems, ACP uptake often remains low, due partially to lack of knowledge and difficulty initiating discussions. Digital tools may help reduce these barriers to entry. We retrospectively examined data from pilot deployment of Koda Health patient-facing ACP among Houston Methodist Coordinated Care patients, for quality improvement (QI) purposes. Patients referred by nurse navigators could access Koda's digital platform, complete ACP, and share the legal documentation generated. Analyzed measures include usage rates and ACP-related decisions within the platform. Of eligible patients (n = 203), 52.7% voluntarily completed their plan. Engagement and completion rates were similar across demographics. Patients indicated majority preference (66.4%) toward spending the last days of life at home. Most patients indicated wanting no life-support intervention if quality of life became unacceptable (51 to 71% across 4 treatments). Life-support decisions were similar between demographic categories, excepting CPR and dialysis, wherein a greater portion of Black patients than White patients preferred at least trial intervention, rather than none. As an observational QI analysis, limitations include bounded geographical reach and lack of data on ACP impacts to subsequent health care utilization, which future studies will address. Findings suggest that digital health tools like Koda can effectively facilitate equitable ACP access and may help support health systems and providers in offering comprehensive ACP.

Improving palliative and supportive care in advanced cirrhosis: the HepatoCare model of integrated collaborative care.

Patients with advanced cirrhosis experience an unpredictable disease trajectory but are infrequently referred to palliative care (PC) services and rarely undertake advance care planning (ACP). We assessed whether a novel model of care increased provision of meaningful PC in advanced cirrhosis compared with standard of care (SOC). Thirty consecutive hepatology clinic outpatients with advanced cirrhosis, meeting one or more cirrhosis-related PC referral criteria, consented to treatment in the HepatoCare clinic (PC physician, specialist liver nurse, pharmacist) in parallel with usual specialist hepatology care. A control cohort of 30 consecutive outpatients with advanced cirrhosis undergoing SOC treatment was retrospectively identified for comparison. The primary outcome was provision of meaningful PC using HepatoCare versus SOC. Additional clinical outcomes were assessed over 12 months or until death and significant differences were identified. The intervention and control cohorts had similarly advanced cirrhosis (mean Child-Pugh scores 8.7 vs 8.2, P = 0.46; mean model for end-stage liver disease scores 14.4 vs 14.6, P = 0.88) but a lower 12-month mortality rate (33% HepatoCare vs 67% SOC; P = 0.02). The intervention cohort experienced higher uptake of formal ACP (100% vs 25% for the control cohort) and outpatient PC referral (100% vs 40%), and were more likely to die at home or in a PC bed/hospice (80% vs 30%). The majority of the HepatoCare cohort (81%) had medications safely deprescribed and experienced fewer unplanned admission days (470 vs 794). HepatoCare is a novel multidisciplinary model of care that integrates effective PC and specialist hepatology management to improve outcomes in advanced cirrhosis.

Advanced care planning in the early phase of COVID-19: a rapid review of the practice and policy lessons learned.

The importance of advance care planning (ACP) has been highlighted by the advent of life-threatening COVID-19. Anecdotal evidence suggests changes in implementation of policies and procedures is needed to support uptake of ACPs. We investigated the barriers and enablers of ACP in the COVID-19 context and identify recommendations to facilitate ACP, to inform future policy and practice. We adopted the WHO recommendation of using rapid reviews for the production of actionable evidence for this study. We searched PUBMED from January 2020 to April 2021. All study designs including commentaries were included that focused on ACPs during COVID-19. Preprints/unpublished papers and Non-English language articles were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened, full-texts were reviewed, and discrepancies resolved by discussion until consensus. From amongst 343 papers screened, 123 underwent full-text review. In total, 74 papers were included, comprising commentaries (39) and primary research studies covering cohorts, reviews, case studies, and cross-sectional designs (35). The various study types and settings such as hospitals, outpatient services, aged care and community indicated widespread interest in accelerating ACP documentation to facilitate management decisions and care which is unwanted/not aligned with goals. Enablers of ACP included targeted public awareness, availability of telehealth, easy access to online tools and adopting person-centered approach, respectful of patient autonomy and values. The emerging barriers were uncertainty regarding clinical outcomes, cultural and communication difficulties, barriers associated with legal and ethical considerations, infection control restrictions, lack of time, and limited resources and support systems. The pandemic has provided opportunities for rapid implementation of ACP in creative ways to circumvent social distancing restrictions and high demand for health services. This review suggests the pandemic has provided some impetus to drive adaptable ACP conversations at individual, local, and international levels, affording an opportunity for longer term improvements in ACP practice and patient care. The enablers of ACP and the accelerated adoption evident here will hopefully continue to be part of everyday practice, with or without the pandemic.

Attitudes and Perceptions on Advance Care Planning Among Chinese-Speaking Older Australians.

Current literature indicates low uptake of advance care planning (ACP) among the Chinese-speaking community in Australia. To increase the uptake of ACP among the Chinese-speaking community, a better understanding of their attitudes and perceptions on end-of-life (EOL) matters, and ACP is required. This study aimed to identify significant events and social and cultural factors that influence participants' values and characterize the attitudes and perceptions towards ACP among older Chinese-speaking Australians. A qualitative study explored participants' experiences through semi-structured one-to-one interviews. The interviews were conducted in Mandarin, Cantonese or English, then translated and transcribed into English. The transcripts were coded and analysed thematically. Twenty participants were recruited (14 female, six male). Participants typically reported a preference to make health-related decisions autonomously. Their perspectives were grounded in past experiences of illnesses and EOL decision-making of loved ones, personal values, and perceived needs. Family dynamics and intimacy of relationships appeared to influence the role and responsibility of family members in EOL decision-making and ACP. Most participants perceived the need to engage in ACP only when encountering significant health changes or higher care needs. Healthcare professionals should initiate ACP discussion using culturally appropriate communication with consideration of personal values, past experiences and family dynamics. Efforts should be invested in raising public awareness of ACP within the Chinese-Australian community.

Advance Care Planning in Belgium

This paper aims to 1) describe current levels of Advance Care Planning (ACP) development since 2002 in Belgium, 2) report on challenges and opportunities to inspire other countries with similar contextual characteristics and 3) support further development of ACP practice and research in Belgium. To address these aims, we consulted local researchers, 12 domain experts and (grey) literature (regulatory documents, reports, policy documents and practice guidelines) on ACP, palliative care, and related healthcare topics. Since 2002, when the Patient’s Right Law was passed in the federal Parliament, Belgium has had a specific medicolegal context for ACP. Initiatives to improve the uptake of ACP have been taken, e.g. standardised documentation, reimbursement codes for physicians provided by the government, and implementation of quality indicators in hospitals and nursing homes. Most of these initiatives are grassroots or predominantly oriented towards a single group of professions, e.g. general practitioners, disregarding the role that other professions can play. The patient groups most often targeted are those with cancer and older adults. Limited but growing attention is given to those with low health literacy or other minority groups. Main barriers to ACP in Belgium are: no unified platform to exchange outcomes of ACP discussions or advance directives between healthcare professionals and though efforts are made, ACP is still predominantly oriented towards documentation.

Advance Care Planning for Spanish-Language Speakers: Patient, Family, and Interpreter Perspectives.

Language access barriers for individuals with limited-English proficiency are a challenge to advance care planning (ACP). Whether Spanish-language translations of ACP resources are broadly acceptable by US Spanish-language speakers from diverse countries is unclear. This ethnographic qualitative study ascertained challenges and facilitators to ACP with respect to Spanish-language translation of ACP resources. We conducted focus groups with a heterogeneous sample of 29 Spanish-speaking persons who had experience with ACP as a patient, family member, and/or medical interpreter. We conducted thematic analysis with axial coding. Themes include: (1). ACP translations are confusing; (2). ACP understanding is affected by country of origin; (3). ACP understanding is affected by local healthcare provider culture and practice; and (4). ACP needs to be normalized into local communities. ACP is both a cultural and clinical practice. Recommendations for increasing ACP uptake extend beyond language translation to acknowledging users' culture of origin and local healthcare culture.

Implementing advance care planning in Swedish healthcare settings – a qualitative study of professionals’ experiences

Background Advance care planning (ACP) is a process involving conversations about values and preferences regarding future care at the end-of-life. ACP has led to positive outcomes, both in relation to quality of life and with increased use of palliative care, less life-sustaining treatment and fewer hospital admissions. Sweden has yet to embrace the practice systematically, but scattered initiatives exist. Aim To study implementation of a routine for ACP in NH settings in Sweden by exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences of engaging in ACP following this implementation. Methods The study followed a qualitative inductive design with convenience and snowball sampling. Semi-structured group and individual interviews with registered healthcare professionals were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Findings Organisational support for sustainable ACP implementation was found to be essential. This included sufficient training, facilitation, collaboration and uniform work routines across providers and professionals. Engaging in ACP conversations following the implemented routine was found to be a process of preparing, being, talking, deciding and sharing. Conclusions Successful implementation of ACP in NHs requires a carefully planned implementation strategy. ACP in NHs tend to be medically focused at the expense of residents’ psychosocial care-planning needs. Widespread uptake of ACP in Sweden could be useful in the national effort to adopt more person-centred care in Swedish healthcare. KEY POINTS While advance care planning has been implemented in many other countries, Sweden lacks a national strategy on advance care planning and Swedish healthcare settings have yet to systematically implement this practice. • This study is the first to report on professionals’ experiences of engaging in sustainable advance care planning, following top-down implementation of the practice in one Swedish region. • Successful implementation of advance care planning in nursing homes requires a system-level approach, and shortcomings of the implementation process are highlighted.

Identifying barriers to advance care plan completion among older adults

Advance care planning (ACP) is an important tool for preserving patient autonomy and benefits patients, families, and providers. ACP is underutilized throughout the United States, yet the factors contributing to this deficit are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of older individuals’ attitudes towards advance care planning and to characterize perceived barriers to ACP completion. A sample of 240 United States residents age 65-years and older were invited to complete a survey assessing their attitudes toward ACP through an online panel. Participants were administered a structured questionnaire comprised of scaled items that were derived from prior qualitative discussions about ACP with groups of seniors. An analysis of Likert scale responses was performed to identify common barriers underlying participants’ reluctance to complete advance care plans. One hundred and thirty (54%) respondents reported having completed an advance care plan, while 110 (46%) had not. Those who completed ACPs feel it is important to avoid burdening their families with difficult decisions and healthcare expenses by stating their preferences, a finding that is consistent with prior research. Among those without advance care plans, 53 (48%) reported they had heard of advance care planning before participating in the study. The most prevalent barriers were uncertainty about healthcare preferences and uncertainty about how to initiate advance care planning. External barriers such as inconvenience, time, and cost did not emerge as important barriers. Free-text responses provided additional context to respondents’ answers. The relatively low rates of advance care plan completion and awareness among older Americans illustrate a pressing need to expand ACP education. Additionally, participants’ responses indicate that a set of internal barriers inhibit older individuals from completing advance care plans. Understanding these barriers can guide patient-centered discussions of advance care planning across multiple clinical settings and inform community efforts to improve ACP access. In particular, helping patients formulate and articulate their healthcare preferences may help increase ACP uptake.

Gynecologic oncology patient perspectives and knowledge on advance care planning: A quality improvement intervention

ObjectivesAssess and improve advance care planning (ACP) awareness and uptake among gynecologic oncology patients. MethodsUsing a quality improvement Plan-Do-Check-Act framework, we completed a single institution needs assessment and intervention. The needs assessment was a 26-question survey assessing baseline ACP knowledge and preferences of gynecologic oncology patients. We used this survey to implement an outpatient intervention in which patients were offered ACP resources (pamphlet, discussion with their gynecologic oncologist, and/or social work referral). We conducted a post-intervention survey among patients who had and had not received ACP resource(s) to assess whether our intervention increased ACP knowledge, discussions, or uptake. ResultsAmong 106 patients surveyed in the needs assessment, 33 % had ACP documents, 26 % had discussed ACP with a physician, and 82 % thought discussing ACP was important. The majority preferred these conversations in the outpatient setting (52 %) with their gynecologic oncologist (80 %) instead of nurses or trainees. In the intervention, 526 patients were offered ACP resources. Compared to women who did not receive resources (n = 324), patients who received ACP resource(s) (n = 202) were more likely to have ACP discussions with their gynecologic oncologist (38 % vs 68 %, P = 0.001) and had greater proficiency regarding how to create ACP documents (median score 5/10 vs 8/10, P = 0.048), although they were no more likely to have ACP documented in their electronic medical record (27 % vs 9 %, p = 0.08). ConclusionsACP uptake among gynecologic oncology patients is low, but ACP discussions with an oncologist during outpatient visits are important to patients and improve their knowledge regarding completing ACP documents.

A model for the uptake of advance care planning in older cancer adults: a scoping review

Advance care planning (ACP) might assist older cancer patients in expressing their goals, values, and care preferences; yet, the ACP uptake rates in this group are low. The goal of this study is to discover factors that influence ACP uptake in older cancer adults and to construct a model that integrates these factors. Using Arksey and O' Malley's methodology, we systematically searched seven electronic databases of ACP literature in older cancer adults from inception to March 2022. To identify factors linked to ACP uptake in elderly cancer patients, researchers used a pre-piloted extraction form. There were two phases to the thematic analysis of the labeled factors. First, factors were grouped into one of three categories using a directed content analysis approach: patient context, provider context, or mechanism. Second, we took both a deductive and inductive thematic approach to identifying and coding contributing factors in each category to identify themes and subthemes. Deductive coding was undertaken using the Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization. Finally, results were visualized into a conceptual model. In the including 37 articles, 131 factors were extracted. Thematic analysis of patient context factors (n = 72) showed that ACP uptake in older cancer adults is associated with predisposing characteristics, enabling resources and need. Factors attributed to provider context (n = 28) concerned predisposing characteristics and enabling resources. Mechanism factors (n = 31) are related to perceived value and patient trust, and the C-ACP uptake model was created. ACP uptake in older cancer patients is commonly influenced by patient-provider-related contextual factors, and highlights the fact that ACP uptake is more likely to be mediated through both perceived value and patient trust. This review serves as a resource for providers exploring ACP implementation options in older cancer adults.

Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

The impact of primary palliative care on advance care planning in advanced cancer.

12030 Background: Palliative care specialists are experts in conducting advance care planning (ACP), but are a limited resource. We sought to determine the impact of a nurse-led primary palliative care intervention on ACP completion among patients with advanced cancer. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial looking at the impact of nurse-based primary palliative care at community cancer centers. In the parent trial, patients with advanced cancer received either monthly primary palliative care visits with trained nurses within their cancer center or usual care. Nurses in the intervention arm received special training in addressing symptom management and ACP. ACP uptake was assessed at enrollment and 3 months later via validated questionnaire in the forms of an end-of-life conversation (EOLC) with one’s oncologist or completion of an advance directive (AD). The present analyses were restricted to patients without ACP at baseline. Multivariable logistic regression tested differences in ACP uptake by treatment arm when adjusting for age, religious importance, education, time with current oncologist, and ECOG. Results: Of 672 patients enrolled, 182/336 in the intervention arm and 196/336 in usual care lacked an EOLC at baseline and completed three-month assessments. Of those, 82/182 (45.1%) in the intervention arm and 29/196 (14.8%) in the usual care arm reported having an EOLC at three months (Table). Similarly, 111/336 in the intervention arm and 105/336 in usual care lacked an AD at baseline and completed the three-month assessments. Of those, 48/111 (43.2%) in the intervention arm and 19/105 (18.1%) in usual care completed an AD over the study period (Table). For both types of ACP, the treatment effect suggested increased uptake of new ACP in the intervention arm after controlling for variables known to be associated with ACP (Table) Conclusions: Nurse-led primary palliative care increased the uptake of ACP among patients with advanced cancer. Training oncology nurses embedded within community cancer centers may represent a feasible mechanism to improve access to primary palliative care and uptake of advance care planning. Clinical trial information: NCT02712229. [Table: see text]

Advance Care Planning in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly acknowledged as a key step to enable patients to define their goals/preferences for future medical care, together with their carers and health professionals. We aimed to map the evidence on ACP in neurodegenerative disorders. We conducted a scoping review by searching PubMed (inception-December 28, 2020) in addition to trial, review, and dissertation registers. From 9367 records, we included 53 studies, mostly conducted in Europe (45%) and US-Canada (41%), within the last five years. Twenty-six percent of studies were qualitative, followed by observational (21%), reviews (19%), randomized controlled trials (RCTs, 19%), quasi-experimental (11%), and mixed-methods (4%). Two-thirds of studies addressed dementia, followed by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (13%), and brain tumors (9%). The RCT interventions (all in dementia) consisted of educational programs, facilitated discussions, or videos for patients and/or carers. In conclusion, more research is needed to investigate barriers and facilitators of ACP uptake, as well as to develop/test interventions in almost all the neurodegenerative disorders. A common set of outcome measures targeting each discrete ACP behavior, and validated across the different diseases and cultures is also needed.

A whole-of-community program of advance care planning for end-of-life care

Since 2015 a whole-of-community program to promote advance care planning (ACP) within one Queensland Hospital and Health Service (HHS) catchment has spread statewide, financed by Queensland Health (QH) agencies and led by the Statewide Office of Advance Care Planning (SOACP). The program aims to identify ACP-eligible patients, invite and finalise ACP discussions, and ensure documented care preferences are easily retrievable by clinicians to guide future care if a person loses capacity. The SOACP established a digital infrastructure whereby quality-audited ACP documents are uploaded to a software platform accessible to all QH clinicians, private medical specialists, ambulance paramedics, general practitioners (GPs), and registered nurses, including those in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). The SOACP also hosts a website providing resources for clinicians and patients, delivers educational events and mentorship to GPs and hospital and RACF staff, and employs ACP facilitators working across all QH HHSs. The program has seen yearly increases in the numbers of ACP documents uploaded from around the state, with up to 79% of eligible patients in some hospitals receiving ACP, significant ACP uptake in RACFs, and acceptance by GPs to engage in ACP. Audits reveal high concordance between stated preferences and hospital care received, and ACP patients, compared to matched non-ACP controls, more frequently die out of hospital, have fewer inpatient days during their last 6 months of life, and receive less invasive care, with similar results seen among same-patient cohorts post-ACP. Barriers and enablers to ACP have been identified which will inform program evolution.

Uptake of advance care planning and its circumstances: Annationwide survey in Australian general practice.

There are potential benefits associated with advance care planning (ACP), and general practitioners (GPs) are well placed to coordinate ACP initiatives with their patients. Few studies have reported on the uptake of different forms of advance care plan conducted by GPs and how this affects patients' place of death. The primary aims of the study were to examine uptake of verbal (conversations regarding care preferences) and written (documented care preferences) advance care plans and their associated factors from the perspective of Australian GPs. The secondary aim was to determine the impact of different types of advance care plans on place of death. Sixty-one GPs from three Australian states used a validated clinic-based data collection process to report on care provided for decedents in the last year of life, including provision of services, place of death, and uptake of ACP. We found that 58 (27.9%), 91 (43.7%) and 59 (28.4%) reported decedents had no advance care plans, verbal plans or written plans, respectively. There were increased uptake of both verbal plans (relative risk ratio [RRR]=13.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.18-77.34) and written plans (RRR=10.61, 95% CI: 1.72-65.57) if GPs foresaw the death for >90days versus <7days. Palliative care training history for GPs predicted uptake of verbal plans (RRR=5.83, 95% CI: 1.46-31.93). Patients with verbal plans versus no plans were more likely to die at a private residence (odds ratio=4.97, 95% CI: 1.32-18.63). Our findings suggest that expectation of death for at least three months prior to the event (where clinically possible) and palliative care training for GPs improve the uptake of ACP in general practice. Larger pragmatic trials are required to determine the impact of ACP on patients' place of death.

Evaluation of a Large Scale Advance Care Planning Co-Design Education Program for Chinese-Speaking People in Australia

Advance care planning (ACP) is important, however ethnic minorities have half the completion rates in the United States compared to Caucasian counterparts, and in Australia only 3.5% of advance directives were completed by those overseas-born.Educational intervention improves ACP knowledge and subsequent uptake. We evaluated immediate and longer-term outcomes of a co-designed ACP education toolkit in Chinese-speaking people in Victoria, Australia. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Chinese-speaking community members who participated in a co-designed Chinese ACP educational workshop. A self-selected subgroup were subsequently contacted 6 months later to determine longer-term outcomes. Of 519 attendees across 17 workshops, 325 (63%) completed the evaluation. The majority (63%;n = 206) were previously unaware of ACP. Perception of receipt of useful information positively correlated with motivation to undertake ACP (r = 0.3486, p < 0.001). Of the 70 participants who consented to follow up, 36% (n = 26) agreed to participate in structured telephone interviews. English speakers were more likely to have undertaken ACP (n = 6 vs n = 3). ACP completion was not associated with being a carer or suffering from cancer or chronic illness. This first Australian study evaluating ACP co-design education implementation outcomes in Chinese-speaking people supports that motivation to undertake ACP is related to knowledge,albeit a modest ACP uptake in a small follow up sample. Clinicians should note that this assists with ACP uptake, with likely downstream improved health outcomes. This co-designed toolkit could be helpful in increasing ACP uptake. Future engagement by Chinese language societies to overcome further barriers to ACP is needed.

Palliative Care for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease on the Liver Transplant Waiting List: An International Systematic Review.

People with end-stage liver disease on the liver transplant waiting list have high symptom burden, which can successfully be addressed by specialist palliative care. Potential tensions with the perceived curative nature of liver transplant make delivering specialist palliative care challenging. This systematic review seeks to establish what is known on the impact of specialist palliative care for patients on liver transplant waiting lists, healthcare professionals' perspectives of providing specialist palliative care for this population, and uptake of advance care planning (ACP). Medline, Embase, and CINAHL were searched to May 5, 2020. Qualitative and quantitative findings were grouped together according to main relevant themes. Eight studies of mixed quality and mainly quantitative, were identified. Findings suggest early palliative care intervention improve patients' symptoms and prompt ACP conversations, but patients on the waiting list receive limited palliative care input. Liver physicians' lack of clarity on referral criteria and liver transplant patients' concerns of being abandoned, were reasons for reluctance to refer to specialist palliative care. They felt referral to specialist palliative care is appropriate only for patients receiving hospice or end of life care. Uptake and understanding of ACP and goals of care designation by patients is poor. This review found evidence of benefit of specialist palliative care for patients on liver transplant waiting lists, but found in a limited understanding of their role. Evidence is limited to studies from North America. Future research is needed to understand better how palliative care could be provided into this clinical environment.