Recovery Of Upper Limb Research Articles

Brain-movement relationship during upper-limb functional movements in chronic post-stroke patients

BackgroundFollowing a stroke, brain activation reorganisation, movement compensatory strategies, motor performance and their evolution through rehabilitation are matters of importance for clinicians. Two non-invasive neuroimaging methods allow for recording task-related brain activation: functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electroencephalography (fEEG), respectively based on hemodynamic response and neuronal electrical activity. Their simultaneous measurement during movements could allow a better spatiotemporal mapping of brain activation, and when associated to kinematic parameters could unveil underlying mechanisms of functional upper limb (UL) recovery. This study aims to depict the motor cortical activity patterns using combined fNIRS-fEEG and their relationship to motor performance and strategies during UL functional tasks in chronic post-stroke patients.MethodsTwenty-one healthy old adults and 21 chronic post-stroke patients were recruited and completed two standardised functional tasks of the UL: a paced-reaching task where they had to reach a target in front of them and a circular steering task where they had to displace a target using a hand-held stylus, as fast as possible inside a circular track projected on a computer screen. The activity of the bilateral motor cortices and motor performance were recorded simultaneously utilizing a fNIRS-fEEG and kinematics platform.Results and conclusionsKinematic analysis revealed that post-stroke patients performed worse in the circular steering task and used more trunk compensation in both tasks. Brain analysis of bilateral motor cortices revealed that stroke individuals over-activated during the paretic UL reaching task, which was associated with more trunk usage and a higher level of impairment (clinical scores). This work opens up avenues for using such combined methods to better track and understand brain-movement evolution through stroke rehabilitation.

Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome: a pilot study

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the recovery of upper limb in patients with post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Methods This pilot study was conducted with 54 patients with post-stroke CRPS. Patients were randomized into three groups: the MLD combined with rTMS group (MLD + rTMS group), the rTMS group and the sham-rTMS group. The results of numeric rating scale (NRS), volumetric measurement, Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE), CRPS severity score (CSS), generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) and patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) before and after the intervention were analyzed. Results Fifty-four participants (37 males, 17 females; mean age 66.11 ± 8.43 years; range, 18 to 85) were included in the study. Among groups, improvements were statistically significant with superiority of rTMS + MLD group after treatment (p < 0.05). NRS, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 in the rTMS + MLD group improved more significantly than those in the rTMS group (p < 0.05). Conclusion MLD combined with rTMS has an add-on efficacy on the basis of rTMS therapy in post-stroke patients, especially in pain. MLD could also have an effect on anxiety and depression.

Modeling Upper Limb Rehabilitation-Induced Recovery after Stroke: The Role of Attention as a Clinical Confounder.

People who have survived stroke may have motor and cognitive impairments. High dose of motor rehabilitation was found to provide clinically relevant improvement to upper limb (UL) motor function. Besides, mounting evidence suggests that clinical, neural, and neurophysiological features are associated with spontaneous recovery. However, the association between these features and rehabilitation-induced, rather than spontaneous, recovery has never been fully investigated.The objective was to explore the association between rehabilitation dose and UL motor outcome after stroke, as well as to identify which variables can be considered potential candidate predictors of motor recovery. People who survived stroke were assessed before and after a period of rehabilitation using motor, cognitive, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological measures. We investigated the association between dose of rehabilitation and UL response (ie, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity [FMA-UE]), using ordinary least squares regression as the primary analysis. To obtain unbiased estimates, adjusting covariates were selected using a directed acyclic graph. Baseline FMA-UE was the only factor associated with motor recovery (b = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.15 points). Attention emerged as a confounder of the association between rehabilitation and final FMA-UE (b = 5.5; 95% CI = -0.8 to 11.9 points), influencing both rehabilitation and UL response. Preserved attention in people who have survived stroke might lead to greater UL motor recovery, albeit estimates have high levels of variability. Moreover, the increase in the dose of rehabilitation can lead to 5.5 points improvement on the FMA-UE, a nonsignificant but potentially meaningful finding. The approach described here discloses a new framework for investigating the effect of rehabilitation treatment as a potential driver of recovery. Attentional resources could play a key role in UL motor recovery. There is a potential association between amount of UL recovery and dose of rehabilitation delivered, needing further exploration. Preserved attention and rehabilitation dose are candidate predictors of UL motor recovery.

Association between depression and adherence to upper limb exercises among community-dwelling stroke survivors: A cross-sectional study.

Upper limb recovery after stroke tends to be slower and incomplete. Participation in motor rehabilitation and exercise adherence are crucial to improve motor recovery. However, post-stroke depression (PSD) could impede active participation in exercises. Therefore, this study investigates the association between depression and exercise adherence among community-dwelling stroke survivors. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 215 stroke survivors undergoing motor rehabilitation between February 2021 and January 2023. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Stroke-Specific Measure of Adherence to Home-based Exercises (SS-MAHE) were measured to assess depression symptoms and exercise adherence, respectively. Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) was administered to identify the influence of impairment on these factors. Chi-square and multinomial and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to determine the relationships between these measurements. Using the Chi-square test, the PHQ-9 was significantly associated with SS-MAHE (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with moderate depression had lower odds of exercise adherence (OR:0.69, 95%CI:0.56, 0.85, p < 0.01) compared to those with no depression. Type of exercises such as movement-based (OR:2.00, 95%CI:1.80, 2.24, p < 0.001) and task-based exercises (OR:1.80, 95%CI:1.53, 2.13, p < 0.001), had higher adherence odds compared to those not exercising. Severe impairment (FMA-UE) was significantly associated with lower exercise adherence (OR:0.71, 95%CI:0.54, 0.94, p < 0.05) and an increased risk of minimal depression (RR:11.09, 95%CI:1.17, 105.04, p < 0.05) compared to mild impairment. PSD significantly impacts exercise adherence, with moderate depression notably reducing adherence rates. Incorporating mental health support into stroke rehabilitation could improve exercise adherence and potentially enhance upper limb motor recovery outcomes.

Post-rehabilitation programme to support upper limb recovery in community-dwelling stroke survivors: a mixed methods cluster-feasibility controlled trial

BackgroundLess than 50% of stroke survivors regain their pre-stroke level of upper limb function, compounded with a lack of long-term rehabilitation options available. The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Programme (GRASP)...

Action observation therapy impact on mirror neurons combined with acupuncture for upper limb motor impairment rehabilitation in stroke patients

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Upper limb (UL) dysfunction rehabilitation in stroke patients is complicated in the clinic. Action observation therapy’s (AOT) impact on mirror neurons (MNs) has been observed and made applications in related brain disease treatment. Acupuncture mentioned in the present study mainly stimulates peripheral nerves for neuronal plasticity. However, the clinical effect of AOT impact on MNs and acupuncture irritate afferent nerve fibers in combination for UL motor impairment rehabilitation after stroke is still unclear. In the present study, we investigate the central and peripheral neural stimulation meanwhile for UL recovery with stroke patients. METHODS: In this clinical study, 82 stroke patients recruited with impaired UL were randomly assigned to three groups. Twenty-four cases were in the AOT group, 28 cases were in the AOT combined acupuncture treatment group, and 30 cases were in the acupuncture treatment group. All volunteers were scored for limb function through the Fugl–Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), the Action Research Arm Test, and the modified Barthel Index (BI) before and after a systematic treatment according to the groups. Meanwhile, conventional physical therapy was also implemented for all cases. RESULTS: Before the specific intervention, the scores of FMA-UE, FMA-UE, and BI with all stroke patients have no significant statistical difference (P &gt; 0.05). After the corresponding treatment, we assessed UL function again at 4 and 8 weeks. At 4 weeks, the patients with AOT showed a significant increase in BI scores compared to the acupuncture group (P &lt; 0.05). At 8 weeks, the FMA-UE scores of the patients with AOT combined with acupuncture were significantly increased than acupuncture alone (P &lt; 0.05). We also observed that the BI scores of the combination and the AOT group both were improved compared to the acupuncture group with significant statistical analysis (P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the MNs theory, we adopted AOT impact on MNs which would be a promising rehabilitation technique, especially combined with acupuncture treatment in UL recovery of stroke. Mirror therapy seems to be effective for central neuronal plasticity, but for action or AOT, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend its optimal strategy and neuromodulation mechanism. Here, research on the MNs-based AOT technique with acupuncture in UL dysfunction with stroke patients is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn (identifier: ChiCTR2300077010).

How does combining physical therapy with transcranial direct stimulation improve upper-limb motor functions in patients with stroke? A theory perspective.

More than half of stroke survivors suffer from upper-limb dysfunction that persists years after stroke, negatively impacting patients' independence and, therefore, affecting their quality of life. Intense motor rehabilitation is required after a stroke to facilitate motor recovery. More importantly, finding new ways to maximize patients' motor recovery is a core goal of stroke rehabilitation. Thus, researchers have explored the potential benefits of combining the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with physical therapy rehabilitation. Specifically, combining transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) with neurorehabilitation interventions can boost the brain's responses to interventions and maximize the effects of rehabilitation to improve upper-limb recovery post-stroke. However, it is still unclear which modes of tDCS are optimal for upper-limb motor recovery in patients with stroke when combined with physical therapy interventions. Here, the authors review the existing literature suggesting combining physical therapy rehabilitation with tDCS can maximize patients' motor recovery using the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Stroke. The authors focus on two main rehabilitation paradigms, which are constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and Mirror therapy with and without tDCS. The authors also discuss potential studies to elucidate further the benefit of using tDCS adjunct with these upper-limb rehabilitation paradigms and its effectiveness in patients with stroke, with the ultimate goal of maximizing patients' motor recovery.

Evaluation of upper limb perception after stroke with the new Affected Limb Perception Questionnaire (ALPQ): a study protocol

BackgroundFollowing a stroke, patients may suffer from alterations in the perception of their own body due to an acquired deficit in body representations. While such changes may impact their quality of life as well as recovery, they are not systematically assessed in clinical practice. This study aims at providing a better understanding of the rate, evolution, and impact on recovery of upper limb (UL) body perceptions (BPs) alterations following stroke. In addition, we will investigate associations among BPs alterations items, their associations with the sensorimotor functions, UL activity, damages in brain structure and connectivity.MethodsWe developed a new tool named ALPQ (for Affected Limb Perception Questionnaire) to address the present study objectives. It assesses subjective alterations in the perception of the affected UL following stroke, by measuring several dimensions, namely: anosognosia for hemiplegia, anosodiaphoria for hemiplegia, hemiasomatognosia, somatoparaphrenia, personification of the affected limb, illusion of modification of physical characteristics (temperature, weight, length), illusory movements, super- or undernumerary limb, UL disconnection, misoplegia, and involuntary movement. This study combines a cross-sectional and longitudinal design. The completed data sample will include a minimum of 60 acute and 100 sub-acute stroke patients. When possible, patients are followed up to the chronic stage. Complementary evaluations are administered to assess patients’ sensorimotor and cognitive functions as well as UL activity, and brain lesions will be analysed.DiscussionThis study will provide a better understanding of BPs alterations following stroke: their rate and evolution, as well as their associations with sensorimotor deficit, cognitive profile and UL activity, brain lesions and recovery. Ultimately, the results could support the personalization of rehabilitation strategy according to patients’ UL perception to maximize their recovery.Study registrationThe protocol for this study has been pre-registered on the Open Science Framework on July the 7th, 2021: https://osf.io/p6v7f.

Post-Stroke Impairments of Manual Dexterity and Finger Proprioception: Their Contribution to Upper Limb Activity Capacity

Background Knowing how impaired manual dexterity and finger proprioception affect upper limb activity capacity is important for delineating targeted post-stroke interventions for upper limb recovery. Objectives To investigate whether impaired manual dexterity and finger proprioception explain variance in post-stroke activity capacity, and whether they explain more variance than conventional clinical assessments of upper limb sensorimotor impairments. Methods Activity capacity and hand sensorimotor impairments were assessed using clinical measures in N = 42 late subacute/chronic hemiparetic stroke patients. Dexterity was evaluated using the Dextrain Manipulandum to quantify accuracy of visuomotor finger force-tracking (N = 36), timing of rhythmic tapping (N = 36), and finger individuation (N = 24), as well as proprioception (N = 27). Stepwise multivariate and hierarchical linear regression models were used to identify impairments best explaining activity capacity. Results Dexterity and proprioceptive components significantly increased the variance explained in activity capacity: (i) Box and Block Test was best explained by baseline tonic force during force-tracking and tapping frequency (adjusted R2 = .51); (ii) Motor Activity Log was best explained by success rate in finger individuation (adjusted R2 = .46); (iii) Action Research Arm Test was best explained by release of finger force and proprioceptive measures (improved reaction time related to use of proprioception; adjusted R2 = .52); and (iv) Moberg Pick-Up test was best explained by proprioceptive function (adjusted R2 = .18). Models excluding dexterity and proprioception variables explained up to 19% less variance. Conclusions Manual dexterity and finger proprioception explain unique variance in activity capacity not captured by conventional impairment measures and should be assessed when considering the underlying causes of post-stroke activity capacity limitations. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03934073.

Point of View on Outcome Prediction Models in Post-Stroke Motor Recovery

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide which can cause significant and persistent upper limb (UL) impairment. It is difficult to predict UL motor recovery after stroke and to forecast the expected outcomes of rehabilitation interventions during the acute and subacute phases when using clinical data alone. Accurate prediction of response to treatment could allow for more timely and targeted interventions, thereby improving recovery, resource allocation, and reducing the economic impact of post-stroke disability. Initial motor impairment is currently the strongest predictor of post-stroke motor recovery. Despite significant progress, current prediction models could be refined with additional predictors, and an emphasis on the time dependency of patient-specific predictions of UL recovery profiles. In the current paper a panel of experts provide their opinion on additional predictors and aspects of the literature that can help advance stroke outcome prediction models. Potential strategies include close attention to post-stroke data collection timeframes and adoption of individual-computerized modeling methods connected to a patient’s health record. These models should account for the non-linear and the variable recovery pattern of spontaneous neurological recovery. Additionally, input data should be extended to include cognitive, genomic, sensory, neural injury, and function measures as additional predictors of recovery. The accuracy of prediction models may be further improved by including standardized measures of outcome. Finally, we consider the potential impact of refined prediction models on healthcare costs.

Imagética motora na reabilitação do membro superior pós AVC: uma revisão narrativa

Introduction: Considering that the brain is a highly complex and organized organ, the severity and impairment of deficits caused by a Stroke largely depend on their extent and location. These deficits are the result of the loss of neural circuits linked to sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. Various clinical studies indicate that mental training through motor imagery (MI) appears to be effective when associated with neurorehabilitation, in the recovery of upper limb function. Objective: To explore the theoretical aspects of using MI in upper limb rehabilitation post-stroke, through a narrative review. Methods: Research was conducted in bibliographic sources through the databases PubMed, EBSCOhost, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro, with the last search carried out on 30th May 2023. Results: RCT articles and systematic reviews that addressed the effects of motor imagery on upper limb function were selected for review. Conclusion: The articles analysed in this review point to a positive relationship between the effects of MI and the recovery of upper limb post-stroke, particularly when this technique is combined with Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, reinforcing the importance of considering the introduction of mental training with Motor Imagery in rehabilitation programs.

The Combined Effect of Robot-assisted Therapy and Activities of Daily Living Training on Upper Limb Recovery in Persons With Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy (RAT) followed by activities of daily living (ADL) training in comparison with conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT) and ADL training in individuals with subacute stroke. DesignA single-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group, open-level, randomized controlled trial. SettingA tertiary care teaching hospital in India. ParticipantsForty-four persons (n=44) with first-ever stroke (in subacute stage) were enrolled from August 2021 to July 2023. InterventionParticipants in the RAT group (n=22) received RAT for 30 minutes, followed by ADL training for 30 minutes. In contrast, participants in the CRT group (n=22) received CRT (30 minutes) followed by ADL training (30 minutes). Both groups received allocated interventions for 15 days over 3 weeks (5 days/week, 3 weeks). Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcome: Motor domain score of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale for upper extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary outcomes: the other domains scores of FMA-UE (UL -sensation, -joint motions, -joint pain); Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (spasticity); hand-function (HF) and ADL-domain scores of the stroke impact scale (SIS); WHOQQL-BREF questionnaires (QOL). Participants were assessed at enrolment and follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 weeks. ResultsPersons who received RAT and ADL training reported significant improvement (P<.05) in UL motor function (mean difference [MD]=3.54;(95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 5.79]), UL passive joint motions (MD=2.54; [95% CI: 1.56 to 3.52]), SIS-HF (MD=6.37;[95% CI: 4.75 to 7.99]), SIS-ADL (MD=7.13 [95% CI: 3.52 to 8.74]), and in all domains of WHOQOL-BREF (except environmental domain) compared with persons who received CRT and ADL training at 12 weeks. ConclusionsThe findings indicate that RAT followed by ADL training is more effective than CRT followed by ADL training in motor improvement, SIS-HF, SIS-ADL, and QOL at 12 weeks.

Post Stroke Depression: Relationship with Upper Limb Recovery, Activity and Participation

Post Stroke Depression: Relationship with Upper Limb Recovery, Activity and Participation

Abstract TP79: Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Enhanced Stroke Recovery: Real-World Application in a Multidisciplinary Program

Introduction: Randomized-controlled trial (RCT) evidence has demonstrated the efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) with paired rehabilitation for upper limb functional recovery after ischemic stroke. There remains a need to assess the generalizability of these findings to a broader population of stroke patients with chronic functional deficits. Hypothesis: VNS for upper limb recovery after stroke may be safely and effectively applied to diverse populations of patients in a multidisciplinary program. Methods: Patients at one center not included in the original RCT of VNS for stroke recovery were implanted with left-sided VNS, paired with six weeks of in-clinic therapy, as implemented in the original RCT. At the conclusion of in-clinic therapy, clinical benefit was assessed by improvement from baseline in the validated Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score for stroke recovery (maximum score of 66 equating to normal function). Results: All four patients included had chronic, stable functional deficits &gt;1.5 years after stroke when implanted with VNS at ages of 43, 61, 70, and 71. Three patients with ischemic stroke were included with FMA-UE improvements of 13 (baseline 45, left-sided deficits), 15 (baseline 36, right-sided deficits), and 6 (baseline 21, left-sided deficits). One patient was implanted 3.0 years after intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke, with an FMA-UE improvement of 14 (baseline 16, right-sided deficits). No procedural complications were seen. Conclusions: Vagal nerve stimulation paired with in-clinic therapy can have a profound impact on upper limb function in patients after stroke. All patients in this series achieved greater FMA-UE improvement than the mean improvement in the largest RCT of VNS for stroke recovery (5.0 ± 4.4 points). This pilot series of real world application of paired VNS for upper limb functional recovery after stroke demonstrates early feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this treatment.

Effects of Task-Oriented and Strength Training on Upper Limb Recovery in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

Effects of Task-Oriented and Strength Training on Upper Limb Recovery in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

Effectiveness of an Intensive, Functional, and Gamified Rehabilitation Program on Upper Limb Function in People With Stroke (EnteRtain): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Background1 Despite a growing interest in gaming rehabilitation for upper limb (UL) recovery post-stroke, studies investigating the effects of game-based rehabilitation incorporating functional games are lacking. Objective To investigate the efficacy of an intensive, functional, gamified rehabilitation program compared to task-based training on UL motor function in acute/sub-acute stroke survivors. Methods This randomized, multicenter, single-blind, clinical trial comprises 120 participants with unilateral stroke who were randomized to receive either gamified training (n = 64) using the ArmAble™ [experimental group (EG)] or task-based training (n = 56) in conjunction with conventional therapy for 2 hours per day, 6 days per week for 2 weeks, followed by UL rehabilitation for another 4 weeks at home. Primary outcomes evaluated by a blinded assessor included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FM-UE), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effect regression model. Results The mean (standard deviation) age of the participants was 54.4 ± 11.7 years (78.1% men) in the EG and 57.7 ± 10.9 years (73.2% men) in the comparator group (CG). The median (interquartile range) time since stroke was 30.0 (54.0) days in the EG and 22.5 (45.0) days in the CG. Following the 2-week intervention, a statistically significant improvement was observed in the EG for the FM-UE [between-group mean differences (95% confidence interval): −3.9 (−6.5, −1.3); P = .003]; but not for the ARAT [−2.9 (−5.8, 0.0); P = .051]. Gains at 6 weeks were significantly greater in the EG for both FM-UE [−3.9 (−6.5, −1.3); P = .003]; and ARAT [−3.0 (−5.9, −0.0); P = .046]. Conclusion Gamified rehabilitation using the ArmAble™ device has shown immediate and short-term improvement in UL function after acute/sub-acute stroke. Clinical Trials Registry Number: CTRI/2020/09/027651

Bilateral versus unilateral upper limb training in (sub)acute stroke: A systematic and meta-analysis.

Integrating high dosage bilateral movements to improve upper limb (UL) recovery after stroke is a rehabilitation strategy that could potentially improve bimanual activities. This study aims to compare the effects of bilateral with unilateral UL training on upper limb impairments and functional independence in (sub)acute stroke. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, ScienceDirect, Web of Science) were systematically searched from inception to June 2023. Randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of bilateral training to unilateral training in stroke survivors (< 6 months poststroke) were included. The treatment effect was computed by the standard mean differences (SMDs). The review included 14 studies involving 706 participants. Bilateral training yielded a significant improvement on UL impairments measured by FMA-UE compared to unilateral training (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.88; P = 0.02). In addition, subgroup analysis based on the severity of UL impairments reported significant results in favour of bilateral UL training in improving UL impairments compared to unilateral training in "no motor capacity" patients (SMD = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.15; P = 0.009). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in favour of bilateral UL training compared to unilateral UL training on daily activities measured by Functional Independence Measure (SMD = 0.45; 0.13 to 0.78; P = 0.006). Bilateral UL training was superior to unilateral training in improving impairments measured by FMA-UE and functional independence in daily activities measured by Functional Independence Measure in (sub)acute stroke. Bilateral upper limb training promotes recovery of impairments and daily activities in (sub)acute phase of stroke.

Wearable Sensor to Monitor Quality of Upper Limb Task Practice for Stroke Survivors at Home.

Many stroke survivors experience persistent upper extremity impairment that limits performance in activities of daily living. Upper limb recovery requires high repetitions of task-specific practice. Stroke survivors are often prescribed task practices at home to supplement rehabilitation therapy. A poor quality of task practices, such as the use of compensatory movement patterns, results in maladaptive neuroplasticity and suboptimal motor recovery. There currently lacks a tool for the remote monitoring of movement quality of stroke survivors' task practices at home. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of classifying movement quality at home using a wearable IMU. Nineteen stroke survivors wore an IMU sensor on the paretic wrist and performed four functional upper limb tasks in the lab and later at home while videorecording themselves. The lab data served as reference data to classify home movement quality using dynamic time warping. Incorrect and correct movement quality was labeled by a therapist. The home task practice movement quality was classified with an accuracy of 92% and F1 score of 0.95 for all tasks combined. Movement types contributing to misclassification were further investigated. The results support the feasibility of a home movement quality monitoring system to assist with upper limb rehabilitation post stroke.

Effects of Cognitive Sensory Motor Training Versus Repetitive Facilitation Exercises of Upper Limb in Hemiparetic Patients

Stroke [CVA] is the sudden loss of neurological function caused by an interruption of blood flow to the brain. Large numbers of people who survive a stroke are left with permanent impairment of arm and hand function, even after completion of conventional rehabilitation programs. The standard neuro physiological facilitation technique use for hemiplegic upper limb have not been confirmed to promote functional recovery of hemiplegic limb. This promote that more research needs to be conducted for same. Cognitive Sensory Motor Training Therapy &amp; The repetitive facilitation exercises (RFEs) Both techniques will promote functional recovery of hemiparetic upper limb and hand by improving joint perception and realization of movement. Hence, this study aims to compare the effectiveness of cognitive sensory motor training versus repetitive facilitation exercises on quality of movement of upper limb, functional activity and Range of motion of upper limb in hemiparetic patients. A blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted 30 patients were divided into 2 groups (GROUP A and GROUP B)- those who performed cognitive Sensory Motor exercises(GROUP A- experimental group) and those who performed repetitive facilitation exercises (GROUP B-control group) Data for measures quality of movement performance of the hemiparetic arm and hand on MESUPES scale, Barthel Index (BI) measures the extent to which somebody can function independently and has mobility in their &amp;, goniometer measuring the joint ranges in each plane of the joint was collected on day 1 (pretreatment session), and on 190 day after the experiment. This study produced a stastically significant increase in overall on quality of movement, functional activity and range of motion in both the group of upper limb in hemiplegic patients. This research also provides evidence that training exercise may be a valuable and important tool in clinical practice and is consistent with the current use by clinical physiotherapist in the treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic patients.

Effect of movement-based priming combined with task specific training on upper limb recovery in patients after stroke

Background: Rehabilitation of upper limb impairments and functional deficits is a top goal in stroke rehabilitation. Alternative therapeutic methods may be developed to facilitate upper limb recovery. Priming prepares the brain for better action. When some therapies accompany Priming, it results in a change in behaviour at the performance level by improving the effect of Neuro-Rehabilitation Therapies and enhancing change in the neural process. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of movement-based priming combined with task-specific training on upper limb recovery in patients after stroke. Materials and methods: Twenty-four subjects in the early phase of stroke, attending the Department of Neurology in a tertiary care hospital of Bhubaneswar, Odisha participated in a single-blind randomized controlled trial. 24 subjects after stroke were recruited to the study and randomly allocated to a control group receiving task-specific training only (TST) and an experimental group receiving Movement-Based Priming with task-specific training (MBP+TST). The control group received only task-specific training for 45 minutes per session three days a week for six weeks, while the experimental group received 15 minutes of priming and 30 minutes of task-specific training. Fugl-Mayer Assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE)was used to measure upper extremity motor recovery, and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) was used to measure the use of arm and hand during activities of daily living at baseline and after six weeks of therapy. Results: Both the TST group and the MBP+TST group had significantly improved their capacity to move and use their upper limbs functionally (p&lt;0.001). FMA-UE and MAL scores improved more favorably in the MBP+TST group than in the TST group (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Priming in combination with task-specific training results in better upper limb recovery than task-specific training alone.