Upper Extremity Motor Score Research Articles

Clinical Subsets of Central Cord Syndrome: Is It a Distinct Entity from Other Forms of Incomplete Tetraplegia for Research?

Central cord syndrome (CCS) is the most prevalent and debated incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) syndrome, with its hallmark feature being more pronounced weakness of the upper extremities than of the lower extremities. Varying definitions encapsulate multiple clinical features under the single umbrella term of CCS, complicating evaluation of its frequency, prognosis discussions, and outcomes research. Often, people with CCS are excluded from research protocols, as it is thought to have a favorable prognosis, but the vague nature of CCS raises doubts about the validity of this practice. The objective of this study was to categorize CCS into specific subsets with clear quantifiable differences, to assess whether this would enhance the ability to determine if individuals with CCS or its subsets exhibit distinct neurological and functional outcomes relative to others with incomplete tetraplegia. This study retrospectively reviewed individuals with new motor incomplete tetraplegia from traumatic SCI who enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database from 2010 to 2020. Through an assessment of the prevailing criteria for CCS, coupled with data analysis, we used two key criteria, including the severity of distal upper extremity weakness (i.e., hands and fingers) and extent of symmetry, to delineate three CCS subsets: full CCS, unilateral CCS, and borderline CCS. Of the 1490 participants in our sample, 17.5% had full, 25.6% had unilateral, and 9% had borderline CCS, together encompassing >50% of motor incomplete tetraplegia cases. Despite the increased sensitivity and specificity of these subsets compared with existing quantifiable criteria, substantial variability in clinical presentation was still observed. Overall, individuals meeting CCS subset criteria showed a higher likelihood of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) D grade than those with motor incomplete tetraplegia without CCS. Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) for those with CCS was lower on admission, a difference that diminished by discharge, whereas their Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) consistently remained higher than for those without CCS. However, these neurological distinctions did not result in significant functional differences, as lower and upper extremity functional outcomes at discharge were mostly similar, with some differences observed within those with AIS D grade. The AIS grade, rather than the diagnosis of CCS, remains the foremost determinant influencing neurological and functional outcomes. We recommend that future studies consider incorporating motor incomplete tetraplegia into their inclusion/exclusion criteria, instead of relying on criteria specific to CCS. Although there remains clinical value in characterizing an injury pattern as CCS and perhaps using the different subsets to better characterize the impairments, it does not appear to be a useful research criterion.

Effects of early mobilization within 48 hours of injury in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury

Objective To investigate the effects of early mobilization within 48 h of injury on motor function and walking ability in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Design A retrospective observational study. Setting Intensive care unit or high care unit of a university hospital emergency center. Participants Of 224 patients with SCI having American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale grades C and D, 158 consecutive patients hospitalized for at least 3 weeks after injury were included. Interventions Patients were categorized into two groups: an early mobilization group in which patients were mobilized within 48 h of injury and a delayed mobilization group in which they were mobilized after 48 h of injury. Outcome measures The upper extremity motor score (UEMS), lower extremity motor score (LEMS), and Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II) were compared using propensity score matching analysis. Results Of the 158 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 32 were matched between the groups. There was a significant difference in the change in LEMS from the initial assessment to the assessment 2 weeks postoperatively in the early mobilization group (median 9 points vs. 3 points, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in UEMS or WISCI II. Conclusion Early mobilization within 48 h may improve lower extremity motor function in patients with acute incomplete cervical SCI.

Systematic Review of Cell Therapy Efficacy in Human Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most debilitating problems for humans. About 6 months after the initial injury, a cascade of secondary cellular and molecular events occurs and the primary damage enters the chronic phase. Current treatments are not curative. One of the new treatment methods is the use of cell therapy, which is gradually being tested in clinical trials to improve the symptoms of SCI patients. In this review article, we investigated the effect of different cell therapy trials in improving patients' symptoms and their paraclinical indicators. In the 72 final reviewed studies with 1144 cases and 186 controls, 20 scores were recorded as outcomes. We categorized the scores into seven groups. In upper extremity motor score, daily living function, trunk stability, postural hypotension, somatosensory evoked potential, and motor evoked potential scores, the bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell therapy had a more healing effect. In the International Association of Neurorestoratology SCI Functional Rating Scale, light touch score, bowel function, decreased spasticity, Visual Analog Scale, and electromyography scores, the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell had more impact. The olfactory ensheathing cell had a greater effect on lower extremity motor score and pinprick scores than other cells. The embryonic stem cell had the greatest effect in improving the important score of the American Spinal Injury Association scale. Based on the obtained results, it seems that a special cell should be used to improve each symptom of patients with chronic SCI, and if the improvement of several harms is involved, the combination of cells may be effective. Impact statement Compared to similar review articles published so far, we reviewed the largest number of published articles, and so the largest number of cases and controls, and the variety of cells we examined was more than other published articles. We concluded that different cells are effective for improving the symptoms and paraclinical indicators of patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell have had the higher overall mean effect in more scores (each in six scores). If the improvement of several harms is involved, the combination of cells may be effective.

Pattern of neurological recovery in persons with an acute cervical spinal cord injury over the first 14 days post injury.

Following a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) it is critical to document the level and severity of injury. Neurological recovery occurs dynamically after injury and a baseline neurological exam offers a snapshot of the patient's impairment at that time. Understanding when this exam occurs in the recovery process is crucial for discussing prognosis and acute clinical trial enrollment. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the trajectory of motor recovery in persons with acute cervical SCI in the first 14 days post-injury; and (2) evaluate if the timing of the baseline neurological assessment in the first 14 days impacts the amount of motor recovery observed. Data were obtained from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) site in Vancouver and additional neurological data was extracted from medical charts. Participants with a cervical injury (C1-T1) who had a minimum of three exams (including a baseline and discharge exam) were included. Data on the upper-extremity motor score (UEMS), total motor score (TMS) and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) were included. A linear mixed-effect model with additional variables (AIS, level of injury, UEMS, time, time2, and TMS) was used to explore the pattern and amount of motor recovery over time. Trajectories of motor recovery in the first 14 days post-injury showed significant improvements in both TMS and UEMS for participants with AIS B, C, and D injuries, but was not different for high (C1-4) vs. low (C5-T1) cervical injuries or AIS A injuries. The timing of the baseline neurological examination significantly impacted the amount of motor recovery in participants with AIS B, C, and D injuries. Timing of baseline neurological exams was significantly associated with the amount of motor recovery in cervical AIS B, C, and D injuries. Studies examining changes in neurological recovery should consider stratifying by severity and timing of the baseline exam to reduce bias amongst study cohorts. Future studies should validate these estimates for cervical AIS B, C, and D injuries to see if they can serve as an "adjustment factor" to control for differences in the timing of the baseline neurological exam.

Risk Factors for Suicidality in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Focus on Physical and Functional Characteristics.

: To demonstrate the association between the physical and functional characteristics of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and suicidality, an area of research that is less understood than the association with demographic, social, and psychological characteristics. : A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 259 patients with SCI admitted for rehabilitation at the National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, between January 2019 and December 2021. Demographic, SCI-related, physical, and functional data were collected from their medical records. Suicide risk was assessed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. : The 259 participants had an average age of 49.1 years, and 75.7% were male. The analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between age and suicidality. No significant differences were found for sex, education, occupation, or SCI-related factors. Lower upper extremity motor score (UEMS) was significantly associated with higher suicide risk. Regarding functional factors, the inability to perform independent rolling, come to sit, wheelchair propelling, and self-driving were associated with increased suicidality. In the multiple linear regression analysis, lower UEMS, limited shoulder joint motion, upper extremity spasticity, and dependent wheelchair propulsion were predictors of higher suicide risk. : This study highlights the associations among physical status, functional dependency, and suicide risk in individuals with SCI. These findings emphasize the need to address psychological aspects and physical and functional factors in the management of individuals with SCI who are at a high risk of suicide.

Functional Outcome Prediction After Spinal Cord Injury Using Ensemble Machine Learning

ObjectivesTo establish a machine learning model to predict functional outcomes after SCI with Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) using features present at the time of rehabilitation admission. Study DesignA retrospective, single-center study. The following data were collected from the medical charts: age, sex, acute length of stay (LOS), level of injury, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), motor scores of each key muscle, Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS), Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), SCIM total scores, and subtotal scores on admission and discharge. Based on the multivariate linear regression analysis, age, acute LOS, UEMS, LEMS, and SCIM subtotal scores were selected as features for machine learning algorithms. Random forest, support vector machine, neural network, and gradient boosting were used as the base models and combined using ridge regression as a metamodel. SettingA spinal center in Tokyo, Japan. ParticipantsParticipants were individuals with SCI admitted to our hospital from March 2016 to October 2021 for the first rehabilitation after the injury. They were divided into 2 groups: training (n=140) and testing (n=70). InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresThe root-mean-square error (RMSE), R2, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) were used as accuracy measures. ResultsRMSE, R2, and MAE of the meta-model using the testing group were 9.7453, 0.8835, and 7.4743, respectively, outperforming any other single base model. ConclusionsOur study revealed that functional prognostication could be achieved using machine-learning methods with features present at the time of rehabilitation admission. Goals can be set at the beginning of rehabilitation. Moreover, our model can be used to evaluate advanced medical treatments, such as regenerative medicine.

Decision Tree Analysis Accurately Predicts Discharge Destination After Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

ObjectivesTo predict discharge destination after spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. Study DesignA retrospective, single-center study. We collected the following data from medical charts: age, sex, living arrangement before injury, acute length of stay (LOS), level of injury on admission, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) on admission, Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) on admission, Lower Extremity Motor Score on admission (LEMS), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) scores on admission and discharge, and discharge destination. A decision tree algorithm was used to establish prediction models in a train-test split manner using features on admission or discharge. SettingA spinal center in Tokyo, Japan. ParticipantsParticipants were individuals with SCI admitted to our hospital from March 2016 to October 2021 for the first rehabilitation after the injury. The study included 210 participants divided into 2 groups: training (n=140) and testing (n=70). Random sampling without replacement was used. InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresPrediction accuracy was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). ResultsAIS was significantly different between the groups. The prediction model using total SCIM scores on discharge (D-Classification and Regression Tree [CART]) revealed that a cut-off value of 40 accurately predicted the discharge destination. In contrast, the prediction model using features on admission (A-CART) revealed that subtotal SCIM mobility scores of 5, age of 74 years, and UEMS of 23 were significant predictors. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of D-CART and A-CART were 0.837, 0.810, 0.911, 0.680, and 0.832 and 0.857, 0.810, 0.913, 0.708, and 0.869, respectively. ConclusionsD-CART and A-CART showed comparable prediction accuracies. This suggests that, even during the early stages of rehabilitation, it is possible to predict the discharge destination.

Robotic locomotor training in a low-resource setting: a randomized pilot and feasibility trial

Purpose Activity-based Training (ABT) represents the current standard of neurological rehabilitation. Robotic Locomotor Training (RLT), an innovative technique, aims to enhance rehabilitation outcomes. This study aimed to conduct a randomized pilot and feasibility trial of a locomotor training program within South Africa. Materials and methods Individuals with chronic traumatic motor incomplete tetraplegia (n = 16). Each intervention involved 60-minute sessions, 3x per week, for 24-weeks. Outcomes included feasibility measures and functional capacity. Results 17 out of 110 individuals initiated the program (recruitment rate = 15.4%) and 16 completed the program (drop-out rate = 5.8%) and attended sessions (attendance rate = 93.9%). Both groups showed a significant increase in upper extremity motor score (MS) and abdominal strength post intervention. Only the RLT group showed a significant change in lower extremity MS, with a mean increase of 3.00 [0.00; 16.5] points over time. Distance walked in the Functional Ambulatory Inventory (SCI-FAI) increased significantly (p = 0.02) over time only for the RLT group. Conclusions Feasibility rates of the intervention and functional outcomes justify a subsequent powered RCT comparing RLT to ABT as an effective rehabilitation tool for potentially improving functional strength and walking capacity in people with incomplete SCI.

The temporal burden of preparing catheters for re-use in adults with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study.

Cross-sectional OBJECTIVES: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction is common among people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Although single-use clean intermittent catheterization is recommended to facilitate routine bladder emptying, catheter re-use is common. Barriers associated with the preparation (i.e., cleaning) of catheters for re-use are unknown. This study examined barriers to catheter re-use in adult individuals with SCI by assessing (1) the time needed to clean a catheter, and (2) the perceived difficulty of the catheter cleaning routine. Laboratory METHODS: Twenty individuals with chronic SCI ( ≥ 1 year since injury; Group 1 = 10 with tetraplegia; Group 2 = 10 with paraplegia) completed the study. Using a standardized cleaning procedure (i.e., Milton method), catheter cleaning was timed for each participant. Perceived difficulty was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Functional impairment was assessed with the Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS). Significant between-group differences were observed for total cleaning time (Group 1 = 1584.1 ± 179.8 s; Group 2 = 1321.0 ± 93.8 s, p = 0.004) and perceived difficulty [Group 1 = 2.6 (2, 3); Group 2 = 2 (1.7, 2.3), p = 0.028]. Total cleaning time was significantly correlated with UEMS (ρ = -0.709, p ≤ 0.001) and perceived difficulty (ρ = 0.468, p = 0.037). UEMS emerged as an independent predictor of total cleaning time (R2 = 0.745, β = -0.833, p ≤ 0.001). Preparing catheters for re-use is time-intensive and difficult for people with higher SCI level, severity and more pronounced upper limb motor impairment, which was independently associated with total cleaning time. Performing this routine on a consistent basis would require a substantial time commitment and would have a profoundly negative impact on overall quality of life.

Soluble Nogo-Receptor-Fc decoy (AXER-204) in patients with chronic cervical spinal cord injury in the USA: a first-in-human and randomised clinical trial

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes neural disconnection and persistent neurological deficits, so axon sprouting and plasticity might promote recovery. Soluble Nogo-Receptor-Fc decoy (AXER-204) blocks inhibitors of axon growth and promotes recovery of motor function after SCI in animals. This first-in-human and randomised trial sought to determine primarily the safety and pharmacokinetics of AXER-204 in individuals with chronic SCI, and secondarily its effect on recovery. We conducted a two-part study in adults (aged 18-65 years) with chronic (>1 year) cervical traumatic SCI at six rehabilitation centres in the USA. In part 1, AXER-204 was delivered open label as single intrathecal doses of 3 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg, or 200 mg, with primary outcomes of safety and pharmacokinetics. Part 2 was a randomised, parallel, double-blind comparison of six intrathecal doses of 200 mg AXER-204 over 104 days versus placebo. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) by investigators using a central electronic system, stratified in blocks of four by American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade and receipt of AXER-204 in part 1. All investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation until at least day 169. The part 2 primary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics, with a key secondary objective to assess change in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) at day 169 for all enrolled participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03989440, and is completed. We treated 24 participants in part 1 (six per dose; 18 men, six women), and 27 participants in part 2 (13 placebo, 14 AXER-204; 23 men, four women), between June 20, 2019, and June 21, 2022. There were no deaths and no discontinuations from the study due to an adverse event in part 1 and 2. In part 2, treatment-related adverse events were of similar incidence in AXER-204 and placebo groups (ten [71%] vs nine [69%]). Headache was the most common treatment-related adverse event (five [21%] in part 1, 11 [41%] in part 2). In part 1, AXER-204 reached mean maximal CSF concentration 1 day after dosing with 200 mg of 412 000 ng/mL (SD 129 000), exceeding those concentrations that were efficacious in animal studies. In part 2, mean changes from baseline to day 169 in ISNCSCI UEMS were 1·5 (SD 3·3) for AXER-204 and 0·9 (2·3) for placebo (mean difference 0·54, 95% CI -1·48 to 2·55; p=0·59). This study delivers the first, to our knowledge, clinical trial of a rationally designed pharmacological treatment intended to promote neural repair in chronic SCI. AXER-204 appeared safe and reached target CSF concentrations; exploratory biomarker results were consistent with target engagement and synaptic stabilisation. Post-hoc subgroup analyses suggest that future trials could investigate efficacy in patients with moderately severe SCI without prior AXER-204 exposure. Wings for Life Foundation, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and ReNetX Bio.

Urodynamics Are Essential to Predict the Risk for Upper Urinary Tract Damage after Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

We used clinical parameters to develop a prediction model for the occurrence of urodynamic risk factors for upper urinary tract (UUT) damage during the first year after acute spinal cord injury (SCI). A total of 97 patients underwent urodynamic investigation at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after acute SCI, within the framework of a population-based longitudinal study at a single university SCI center. Candidate predictors included demographic characteristics and neurological and functional statuses 1 month after SCI. Outcomes included urodynamic risk factors for UUT damage: detrusor overactivity combined with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, maximum storage detrusor pressure (pDetmax) ≥ 40 cmH2O, bladder compliance < 20 mL/cmH2O, and vesicoureteral reflux. Multivariable logistic regression was used for the prediction model development and internal validation, using the area under the receiver operating curve (aROC) to assess model discrimination. Two models showed fair discrimination for pDetmax ≥ 40 cmH2O: (i) upper extremity motor score and sex, aROC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69-0.89), C-statistic 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87), and (ii) neurological level, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade, and sex, aROC 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.89), C-statistic 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85). We identified two models that provided fair predictive values for urodynamic risk factors of UUT damage during the first year after SCI. Pending external validation, these models may be useful for clinical trial planning, although less so for individual-level patient management. Therefore, urodynamics remains essential for reliably identifying patients at risk of UUT damage.

Grasp Analysis in the Home Environment as a Measure of Hand Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Background Following a spinal cord injury, regaining hand function is a top priority. Current hand assessments are conducted in clinics, which may not fully represent real-world hand function. Grasp strategies used in the home environment are an important consideration when examining the impact of rehabilitation interventions. Objective The main objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between grasp use at home and clinical scores. Method We used a previously collected dataset in which 21 individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) recorded egocentric video while performing activities of daily living in their homes. We manually annotated 4432 hand-object interactions into power, precision, intermediate, and non-prehensile grasps. We examined the distributions of grasp types used and their relationships with clinical assessments. Results Moderate to strong correlations were obtained between reliance on power grasp and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM; P < .05), the upper extremity motor score (UEMS; P < .01), and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) Prehension (P < .01) and Strength (P < .01). Negative correlations were observed between the proportion of non-prehensile grasping and SCIM (P < .05), UEMS (P < .05), and GRASSP Prehension (P < .01) and Strength (P < .01). Conclusion The types of grasp types used in naturalistic activities at home are related to upper limb impairment after cervical SCI. This study provides the first direct demonstration of the importance of hand grasp analysis in the home environment.

Impact of Mechanism of Injury on Long-term Neurological Outcomes of Cervical Sensorimotor Complete Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Mechanism of injury is a largely understudied descriptor of acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). This study sought to compare the impact of high-energy and low-energy mechanisms of injury in neurological outcomes of cervical sensorimotor complete tSCI. Patients with tSCI were identified in 4 prospective, multicenter clinical trials and registries. American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade was assessed ≤ 72 hours postinjury and followed up between 12 to 52 weeks. Patients were included if they had a cervical and sensorimotor complete (AIS-A) injury at baseline. Study outcomes were change in AIS grade and lower extremity motor, upper extremity motor, and total motor scores. Propensity score matching between high-energy mechanisms of injury (HEMI; e.g. , motor vehicle collisions) and low-energy mechanisms of injury (LEMI; e.g. , falls) groups was performed. Adjusted groups were compared with paired t-tests and McNemar test. Of 667 patients eligible for inclusion, 523 experienced HEMI (78.4%). HEMI patients were younger, had lower body mass index, more associated fractures or dislocations, and lower baseline lower extremity motor scores. After propensity score matching of these baseline variables, 118 pairs were matched. HEMI patients had a significantly worse motor recovery from baseline to follow-up based on their diminished change in upper extremity motor scores and total motor scores. Cervical sensorimotor complete tSCIs from HEMI were associated with significantly lower motor recovery compared to LEMI patients. Our findings suggest that mechanism of injury should be considered in modelling prognosis and in understanding the heterogeneity of outcomes after acute tSCI.

Cortical Reorganization of Early Somatosensory Processing in Hemiparetic Stroke.

The cortical motor system can be reorganized following a stroke, with increased recruitment of the contralesional hemisphere. However, it is unknown whether a similar hemispheric shift occurs in the somatosensory system to adapt to this motor change, and whether this is related to movement impairments. This proof-of-concept study assessed somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), P50 and N100, in hemiparetic stroke participants and age-matched controls using high-density electroencephalograph (EEG) recordings during tactile finger stimulation. The laterality index was calculated to determine the hemispheric dominance of the SEP and re-confirmed with source localization. The study found that latencies of P50 and N100 were significantly delayed in stroke brains when stimulating the paretic hand. The amplitude of P50 in the contralateral (to stimulated hand) hemisphere was negatively correlated with the Fügl-Meyer upper extremity motor score in stroke. Bilateral cortical responses were detected in stroke, while only contralateral cortical responses were shown in controls, resulting in a significant difference in the laterality index. These results suggested that somatosensory reorganization after stroke involves increased recruitment of ipsilateral cortical regions, especially for the N100 SEP component. This reorganization delays the latency of somatosensory processing after a stroke. This research provided new insights related to the somatosensory reorganization after stroke, which could enrich future hypothesis-driven therapeutic rehabilitation strategies from a sensory or sensory-motor perspective.

Early vs Late Surgical Decompression for Central Cord Syndrome

The optimal clinical management of central cord syndrome (CCS) remains unclear; yet this is becoming an increasingly relevant public health problem in the face of an aging population. To provide a head-to-head comparison of the neurologic and functional outcomes of early (<24 hours) vs late (≥24 hours) surgical decompression for CCS. Patients who underwent surgery for CCS (lower extremity motor score [LEMS] - upper extremity motor score [UEMS] ≥ 5) were included in this propensity score-matched cohort study. Data were collected from December 1991 to March 2017, and the analysis was performed from March 2020 to January 2021. This study identified patients with CCS from 3 international multicenter studies with data on the timing of surgical decompression in spinal cord injury. Participants were included if they had a documented baseline neurologic examination performed within 14 days of injury. Participants were eligible if they underwent surgical decompression for CCS. Early surgery was compared with late surgery. Propensity scores were calculated as the probability of undergoing early compared with late surgery using the logit method and adjusting for relevant confounders. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio by an optimal-matching technique. The primary end point was motor recovery (UEMS, LEMS, American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] motor score [AMS]) at 1 year. Secondary end points were Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score and complete independence in each FIM motor domain at 1 year. The final study cohort consisted of 186 patients with CCS. The early-surgery group included 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.8 [16.8] years; 66 male [71.0%]), and the late-surgery group included 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.0 [15.5] years; 75 male [80.6%]). Early surgical decompression resulted in significantly improved recovery in upper limb (mean difference [MD], 2.3; 95% CI, 0-4.5; P = .047), but not lower limb (MD, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.8 to 3.0; P = .30), motor function. In an a priori-planned subgroup analysis, outcomes were comparable with early or late decompressive surgery in patients with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade D injury. However, in patients with AIS grade C injury, early surgery resulted in significantly greater recovery in overall motor score (MD, 9.5; 95% CI, 0.5-18.4; P = .04), owing to gains in both upper and lower limb motor function. This cohort study found early surgical decompression to be associated with improved recovery in upper limb motor function at 1 year in patients with CCS. Treatment paradigms for CCS should be redefined to encompass early surgical decompression as a neuroprotective therapy.

A Novel Method to Classify Cervical Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Based on Potential for Recovery: A Group-Based Trajectory Analysis.

The outcomes of cervical incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) are heterogeneous. This study sought to dissociate subgroups of cervical incomplete SCI patients with distinct longitudinal temporal profiles of recovery in upper limb motor function. Patients with cervical incomplete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS] B-D; C1-C8) were identified from four prospective, multi-center SCI datasets. A group-based trajectory model was fit to longitudinal upper extremity motor scores out to 1 year. Multi-variable multinomial logistic regression was performed to identify features that characterize each trajectory group. A classification system for predicting trajectory group at baseline was developed by recursive partitioning. In total, 801 patients were eligible. Four distinct trajectory groups were identified: 1) "Poor outcome": Severe injury, very minimal recovery; 2) "Moderate recovery": Moderate-to-severe injury, moderate recovery; most recovery occurs by 6 months, with mild, gradual recovery continuing thereafter; 3) "Good recovery": Moderate injury, good recovery; most recovery occurs by 3 months, with mild, gradual recovery continuing thereafter; and 4) "Excellent outcome": Mild injury, recovery to normal/near-normal by 3 months. On adjusted analyses, older age was associated with lower likelihood of "excellent outcome" (p = 0.020). AIS C and D injuries were associated with "moderate recovery," "good recovery," and "excellent outcome" (p < 0.001). Mid-cervical injuries occurred more frequently in "moderate recovery," "good recovery," and "excellent outcome" (p < 0.001) groups. Early surgical decompression (< 24 h) was associated with increased propensity for "good recovery" (p = 0.039) and "excellent outcome" (p = 0.048). A classification model based on recursive partitioning could predict trajectory group using age, AIS grade, and neurological level with an area under the curve of 0.81. Patients with cervical incomplete SCI demonstrate distinct temporal profiles of recovery in upper limb motor function. The trajectory a patient is likely to follow may be predicted at baseline with fair accuracy.

22. Early vs (

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> The optimal clinical management of central cord syndrome (CCS) remains unclear; yet this is becoming an increasingly relevant public health problem in the face of the global aging population. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To provide a head-to-head comparison of the neurological and functional outcomes of early (<24 hrs) vs late (24 hrs) surgical decompression for CCS. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Propensity, score-matched analysis cohort study. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Participants were included if they had a documented baseline American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) / International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) neurological examination performed within 14 days of injury. Participants were eligible if they underwent surgical decompression for CCS, as defined by apoint difference of five or more between baseline ASIA lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and upper extremity motor score (UEMS), in favor of the lower limbs (LEMS - UEMS 5). <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> The primary endpoint was motor recovery (upper extremity motor score (UEMS); lower extremity motor score (LEMS); AMS) at one year. Secondary endpoints were Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score and complete independence in each FIM motor domain at one year. <h3>METHODS</h3> This study identified CCS patients from three international, multicentre studies examining the timing of surgical decompression in spinal cord injury. Patients who underwent surgery for CCS (LEMS-UEMS5) were identified from three spinal cord injury (SCI) datasets (NACTN; STASCIS; NASCIS III). Propensity scores were calculated as the probability of undergoing early (< 24 hrs) compared to late (24 hrs) surgery using the logit method and adjusting for data source, age, injury mechanism, and baseline ASIA motor score (AMS), AIS grade, and neurological level. Propensity score matching was performed in a one-to-one ratio by an "optimal matching" technique. Effect sizes for outcomes were summarized by mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals. <h3>RESULTS</h3> The final study cohort consisted of 186 patients with CCS. Baseline characteristics were balanced between matched early (N=93) and late (N=93) surgery groups. Early surgical decompression resulted in significantly improved recovery in upper limb (MD 2.3, P=0.047), but not lower limb (MD 1.1, P=0.256), motor function, as compared with late surgery. More patients in the early surgery group appeared to achieve complete independence in various functional activities, particularly those involving upper limb function; however, these associations did not reach statistical significance, and there was no difference in one-year FIM motor score (MD 4.4, P=0.182). On subgroup analysis, outcomes were comparable with early or late decompressive surgery in AIS grade D patients. However, in patients with AIS grade C injury, early surgery resulted in significantly greater recovery in overall motor score (MD 9.5, P=0.038), owing to gains in both upper and lower limb motor function. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> This study found early (<24 hrs) compared to late (24 hrs) surgical decompression to result in improved recovery in upper limb motor function at one year in patients with central cord syndrome. The benefit of early surgery was especially realized in patients with AIS grade C injury. Treatment paradigms for central cord syndrome should be redefined to encompass early surgical decompression as a neuroprotective therapy. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Measuring Hand Use in the Home after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using Egocentric Video.

Egocentric video has recently emerged as a potential solution for monitoring hand function in individuals living with tetraplegia in the community, especially for its ability to detect functional use in the home environment. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a wearable vision-based system for measuring hand use in the home among individuals living with tetraplegia. Several deep learning algorithms for detecting functional hand-object interactions were developed and compared. The most accurate algorithm was used to extract measures of hand function from 65 h of unscripted video recorded at home by 20 participants with tetraplegia. These measures were: the percentage of interaction time over total recording time (Perc); the average duration of individual interactions (Dur); and the number of interactions per hour (Num). To demonstrate the clinical validity of the technology, egocentric measures were correlated with validated clinical assessments of hand function and independence (Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension [GRASSP], Upper Extremity Motor Score [UEMS], and Spinal Cord Independent Measure [SCIM]). Hand-object interactions were automatically detected with a median F1-score of 0.80 (0.67-0.87). Our results demonstrated that higher UEMS and better prehension were related to greater time spent interacting, whereas higher SCIM and better hand sensation resulted in a higher number of interactions performed during the egocentric video recordings. For the first time, measures of hand function automatically estimated in an unconstrained environment in individuals with tetraplegia have been validated against internationally accepted measures of hand function. Future work will necessitate a formal evaluation of the reliability and responsiveness of the egocentric-based performance measures for hand use.

Recognizing the individualized sensorimotor loop of stroke patients during BMI-supported rehabilitation training based on brain functional connectivity analysis

BackgroundElectroencephalogram (EEG) based brain-machine interaction training can facilitate rehabilitation by closing the sensorimotor loop. However, it remains unclear how to evaluate whether the loop is closed, especially for stroke patients whose brain regions of motor control and sensorimotor feedback could be altered. Our hypothesis is that motor recovery depends on whether sensorimotor loop is established poststroke. This study aims to explore how to evaluate the establishment of sensorimotor loop based on the evolving neural reorganization patterns after stroke. New Method14 stroke patients participated in the experiment and EEG were recorded during three specific tasks: Movement Imagery (MI), Passive Movement (PM) and Movement Execution (ME). Activated brain regions correlated with movement intention expression and sensorimotor feedback were detected respectively during MI and PM. In ME, local-averaged Phase Lag Index (PLI) was analyzed to represent the functional connectivity between activated brain regions of MI and PM. ResultsIndividualized cortical activation was found both in MI and PM. The overlapping brain activation during PM and MI did not correlate with patient’s Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Score (FMU) . However, we found that FMU of the group with higher local-averaged PLI was statistically higher than FMU of the group with lower local-averaged PLI compared with global-averaged PLI (p < 0.05). ConclusionsThe findings demonstrate functional connectivity between activated brain regions of motor control and sensorimotor feedback may imply if the individualized sensorimotor loop is established poststroke. The successful formation of the closed loop can indicate stroke patients’ motor recovery.

The MMT of Elbow Flexion and the AFE Predict Impairment and Disability at 3 Weeks in Patients With Acute Stroke.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether upper extremity motor function assessment within 72 h from stroke onset can predict the functional outcomes of the upper extremity.DesignThis was a prospective, cohort study of patients with a first unilateral hemispheric stroke between May 2018 and March 2020. The motor arm item of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, manual muscle testing of the elbow and forearm, and active finger extension scale were assessed within 72 h after stroke onset. The Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity motor score and action research arm test were assessed at discharge from the acute hospital. Multiple regression analysis was used to study predictors of upper extremity motor function at discharge from the acute hospital. The adjustment variables included age, sex, thumb localizing test, and visuospatial function.ResultsSixty acute stroke patients were recruited. The model with the highest coefficient of determination for the Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity motor score at discharge was the elbow flexion model (R2 = 0.76), followed by the active finger extension model (R2 = 0.69). For the action research arm test, the highest model was the active finger extension model (R2 = 0.64), followed by the elbow flexion model (R2 = 0.63).ConclusionThe manual muscle testing of elbow flexion and the active finger extension may be useful for predicting impairment and disability at 3 weeks in patients with acute stroke.