Upper Esophageal Sphincter High Pressure Zone Research Articles

Variables influencing manometric parameters of deglutitive and non-deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter: A study of 89 asymptomatic participants.

High-resolution manometry overcomes limitations imposed by axial and radial asymmetry as well as swallow and respiration-induced movement of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), allowing for its reliable use in evaluation of dysphagic and reflux patients. The aim of this study was to determine normative values and their variability across position, sex, age, height, weight, BMI, and volume for clinically relevant deglutitive and non-deglutitive UES parameters. We studied 89 asymptomatic volunteers age 19-90years, (45 female) during 3-10 repetitions of dry, 5 and 10ml water swallows at 30-s intervals using high-resolution manometry. Upper esophageal sphincter high-pressure zone was longer in men than women and in supine than upright position. UES basal contractile integral and mean basal pressure were higher in supine compared to upright; higher in men than women, inversely correlated with age, correlated positively with height and with weight in the supine position only. UES relaxation duration was longer in upright than in supine position but not affected by age, sex, height, weight, or BMI. It was longer with 5 and 10ml compared with dry swallows. UES minimum/nadir relaxation and mean relaxation pressures were lower in upright than supine position, increased with increase in age and were higher in men than women. Position, sex, age, height, weight, and volume affect some deglutitive and non-deglutitve UES manometric parameters. BMI does not affect the studied manometric parameters. These effects should be taken into consideration in clinical evaluation of UES.

A human model of restricted upper esophageal sphincter opening and its pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia due to upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysfunction is commonly encountered in the clinical setting. Selective experimental perturbation of various components of the deglutitive apparatus can provide an opportunity to improve our understanding of the swallowing physiology and pathophysiology. The aim is to characterize the pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena in an experimentally induced restriction of UES opening in humans. We studied 14 volunteers without any dysphagic symptoms (7 men, 66 ± 11 yr) but with various supraesophageal reflux symptoms. To induce UES restriction, we used a handmade device that with adjustment could selectively apply 0, 20, 30, or 40 mmHg pressure perpendicularly to the cricoid cartilage. Deglutitive pharyngeal and UES pressure phenomena were determined during dry and 5- and 10-ml water swallows × 3 for each of the UES perturbations. External cricoid pressure against the UES resulted in a significant increase in hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure and UES nadir deglutitive relaxation pressure for all tested swallowed volumes (P < 0.05). Application of external cricoid pressure increased the length of the UES high pressure zone from 2.5 ± 0.2 to 3.1 ± 0.2, 3.5 ± 0.1, and 3.7 ± 0.1 cm for 20, 30, and 40 mmHg cricoid pressure, respectively (P < 0.05). External cricoid pressure had no significant effect on pharyngeal peristalsis. On the other hand, irrespective of external cricoid pressure deglutitive velopharyngeal contractile integral progressively increased with increased swallowed volumes (P < 0.05). In conclusion, acute experimental restriction of UES opening by external cricoid pressure manifests the pressure characteristics of increased resistance to UES transsphincteric flow observed clinically without affecting the pharyngeal peristaltic contractile function.

841 Variability of Pharyngeal Peristaltic Pressure Parameters Measured by High Resolution Manometry (HRM); A Study of Over 900 Pressure Signatures

Introduction: With the many alluring features of HRM including superior spatial resolution and rapid recording frequency, interest in manometric evaluation of the pharynx during swallowing has been renewed. However, crucial information about the physiologic variability of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave parameters is scarce. These data are vital for developing normative data and correct interpretation of pharyngeal manometry results. The aims of the present study were to determine: 1) the variability of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave amplitude and duration between swallows at various distances from the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and 2) Pharyngeal Contractile Integral(PCI),hypo-pharyngeal intra-bolus pressure(IBP) and nadir UES pressure(N-UESP) for a range of swallowed volumes. Methods: We studied seven healthy individuals (age:51±25 years, 6F) in upright head neutral position using a high resolution manometry catheter with 36 recording sites positioned trans-nasally such that pressure was recorded from the entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. In each subject, we tested three repetitions each of dry and room temperature 0.5,5 and 10ml water at 20-30second intervals. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis Testing, Bartlett's Test of variance, Conover's Squared Rank Test of Variance and the coefficient of variation. Results: Spatial variation of the peak peristaltic pressure wave amplitude showed significant difference in variance across locations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8cm above the upper margin of the UES high pressure zone (umUESHPZ) for dry(p=0.043), 0.5 (p=0.006) and 5ml (p=0.049)swallows (table). There was significant variability in the peak amplitude between swallows at all sites as seen by the standard deviation bars in the figure (representative example for 5ml swallows). The smallest degree of variability across sites was seen at p6 (6 cm above the umUESHPZ) shown in the figure as circles representing the coefficients of variation. Variance due to volume effects also showed significant differences; however, these difference in variance were confined only to sites 3 (p=0.015), 4 (p=0.020) and 6 (p=0.022) cm above the umUESHPZ. In contrast, PCI and IBP showed similar variability for the tested swallow volumes. Conclusions: 1) Parameters of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave vary significantly from one swallow to the other for dry and water swallows,2) this variability is significantly different for different locations across the pharynx. 3) these findings should be taken into account for defining normative data and using pharyngeal manometry for clinical purposes. Supported in part by R01DK025731 and P01DK068051.

Tu1454 Inter-Rater Agreement for Analysis of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry Parameters

Introduction: Pharyngeal manometry using high resolution technology is a developing field that is being advocated for evaluation of dysphagic symptoms that are not explained by a conclusive or objective finding on routine evaluation such as radiography. Fundamental to the success of this approach, automated analysis techniques not withstanding, is the reliability and reproducibility of the measurements performed by the clinicians. Our aim was to determine the inter-rater reliability for measurements of deglutitive pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave characteristics such as peak peristaltic amplitude, pharyngeal contractile integral (PCI), nadir upper esophageal sphincter (UES) deglutitive pressure and intrabolus pressure (IBP). Methods: We studied 11 healthy individuals (age 56±25 years, 6F) by high resolution manometry using a catheter with 36 recording sites spaced at 1 cm intervals that recorded from the entire pharyngeal contractile zone, UES and proximal esophagus. Each volunteer swallowed 0.5 ml of room temperature water 40 times with 20 seconds intervals between swallows. Three raters (one seasoned, two with recent training) each independently analyzed a total of 3080 pressure signatures, 440 pharyngeal contractile integrals and 440 intra-bolus pressures. Measured parameters included peak peristaltic wave pressures at specific manometric locations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 cm above the upper margin of the UES high pressure zone, as well as PCI, nadir UES deglutitive pressure and IBP. Inter-rater agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Results: As seen in the table, agreement among the three raters all for all manometric locations was highly significant (p<0.001) with sites p2 and p3 (2 and 3cm above the upper margin of the UES) having the lowest levels of agreement. Furthermore, metrics with a single value for each swallow like PCI and UES nadir pressure also showed highly significant agreement whereas IBP measurements did not. A graphical depiction of intra-rater agreement is shown in the figure for PCI as a representative parameter. Conclusion: Analysis of pharyngeal pressure parameters by individuals with proper training is reproducible as evidenced by high level of agreement between the results obtained independently by three different raters. Supported in part by EOPH grant and PPG. Supported in part by R01DK025731 and P01DK068051

842 Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Acidic and Non-Acidic Gastric Juice Modulates Bronchial Epithelial IL-8 Response

Introduction: With the many alluring features of HRM including superior spatial resolution and rapid recording frequency, interest in manometric evaluation of the pharynx during swallowing has been renewed. However, crucial information about the physiologic variability of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave parameters is scarce. These data are vital for developing normative data and correct interpretation of pharyngeal manometry results. The aims of the present study were to determine: 1) the variability of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave amplitude and duration between swallows at various distances from the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and 2) Pharyngeal Contractile Integral(PCI),hypo-pharyngeal intra-bolus pressure(IBP) and nadir UES pressure(N-UESP) for a range of swallowed volumes. Methods: We studied seven healthy individuals (age:51±25 years, 6F) in upright head neutral position using a high resolution manometry catheter with 36 recording sites positioned trans-nasally such that pressure was recorded from the entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. In each subject, we tested three repetitions each of dry and room temperature 0.5,5 and 10ml water at 20-30second intervals. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis Testing, Bartlett's Test of variance, Conover's Squared Rank Test of Variance and the coefficient of variation. Results: Spatial variation of the peak peristaltic pressure wave amplitude showed significant difference in variance across locations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8cm above the upper margin of the UES high pressure zone (umUESHPZ) for dry(p=0.043), 0.5 (p=0.006) and 5ml (p=0.049)swallows (table). There was significant variability in the peak amplitude between swallows at all sites as seen by the standard deviation bars in the figure (representative example for 5ml swallows). The smallest degree of variability across sites was seen at p6 (6 cm above the umUESHPZ) shown in the figure as circles representing the coefficients of variation. Variance due to volume effects also showed significant differences; however, these difference in variance were confined only to sites 3 (p=0.015), 4 (p=0.020) and 6 (p=0.022) cm above the umUESHPZ. In contrast, PCI and IBP showed similar variability for the tested swallow volumes. Conclusions: 1) Parameters of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave vary significantly from one swallow to the other for dry and water swallows,2) this variability is significantly different for different locations across the pharynx. 3) these findings should be taken into account for defining normative data and using pharyngeal manometry for clinical purposes. Supported in part by R01DK025731 and P01DK068051.

843 Association of Novel High-Resolution Impedance Manometry Parameters (HRIM) With Timed Barium Esophagram Measures and Dysphagia Symptoms in Achalasia Patients

Introduction: With the many alluring features of HRM including superior spatial resolution and rapid recording frequency, interest in manometric evaluation of the pharynx during swallowing has been renewed. However, crucial information about the physiologic variability of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave parameters is scarce. These data are vital for developing normative data and correct interpretation of pharyngeal manometry results. The aims of the present study were to determine: 1) the variability of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave amplitude and duration between swallows at various distances from the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and 2) Pharyngeal Contractile Integral(PCI),hypo-pharyngeal intra-bolus pressure(IBP) and nadir UES pressure(N-UESP) for a range of swallowed volumes. Methods: We studied seven healthy individuals (age:51±25 years, 6F) in upright head neutral position using a high resolution manometry catheter with 36 recording sites positioned trans-nasally such that pressure was recorded from the entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. In each subject, we tested three repetitions each of dry and room temperature 0.5,5 and 10ml water at 20-30second intervals. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis Testing, Bartlett's Test of variance, Conover's Squared Rank Test of Variance and the coefficient of variation. Results: Spatial variation of the peak peristaltic pressure wave amplitude showed significant difference in variance across locations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8cm above the upper margin of the UES high pressure zone (umUESHPZ) for dry(p=0.043), 0.5 (p=0.006) and 5ml (p=0.049)swallows (table). There was significant variability in the peak amplitude between swallows at all sites as seen by the standard deviation bars in the figure (representative example for 5ml swallows). The smallest degree of variability across sites was seen at p6 (6 cm above the umUESHPZ) shown in the figure as circles representing the coefficients of variation. Variance due to volume effects also showed significant differences; however, these difference in variance were confined only to sites 3 (p=0.015), 4 (p=0.020) and 6 (p=0.022) cm above the umUESHPZ. In contrast, PCI and IBP showed similar variability for the tested swallow volumes. Conclusions: 1) Parameters of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure wave vary significantly from one swallow to the other for dry and water swallows,2) this variability is significantly different for different locations across the pharynx. 3) these findings should be taken into account for defining normative data and using pharyngeal manometry for clinical purposes. Supported in part by R01DK025731 and P01DK068051.

338 Maturation and Stimulus-Volumes Modulate Pharyngeal Provocation Induced Pharyngeal Rhythms in Human Premature Infants

Introduction: Human disease models can help to better understand the pathophysiology and systematically characterize its consequences. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysphagia is a common sequela of a number of disorders including CVA, reflux disease and aging. Intrinsic disorders of the UES such as fibrosis and inflammation can result in its diminished distensibility and restrict its opening causing dysphagia. Aim: To characterize the pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena in an experimentally induced restricted UES model in humans. Methods: We studied 15 patients (8 male, age 65±11 years) with various supraesophageal reflux symptoms. To induce UES restriction, we used a handmade simple device comprised of two components that could be comfortably worn around the neck: an elastic band and a cushion (5 X 3 X 2.5 CM). The cushion was placed horizontally at the center of the cricoid cartilage. By adjusting the elastic band, we selectively applied 0, 20, 30, 40 mmHg pressure perpendicular to the cricoid laryngeal structure inducing equivalent resistance against UES opening. In this model, the UES, in addition to relaxation, has to overcome the externally imparted pressure to open. Deglutitive pharyngeal and UES pressure phenomena were determined using high-resolution manometry, which recorded from entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. We tested dry, 5 and 10ml swallows x 3. Results: Application of the external pressure band increased the length of the UES high pressure zone from 2.5 cm without the band to 3.1, 3.5 and 3.7 cm for 20, 30, 40mmHg cricoid restrictive pressure, respectively (p<0.05). Increased restrictive pressure against UES resulted in a significant increase in hypopharyngeal intra-bolus pressure (IBP) during all swallowed volumes (figure). Similarly, increased UES restrictive pressure resulted in increased UES nadir deglutitive relaxation pressure for all swallowed volumes (table, p<0.05). Swallowed volume had no effect on pharyngeal peak pressure, duration or velocity. None of these were affected by restrictive external UES pressures. Deglutitive velopharygeal pressure progressively increased with increased swallowed volume (p<0.05). These pressures were also not affected by UES restrictive external pressure. Conclusions: Acute experimental restriction of UES opening by external cricoid pressure in humans manifests the pressure characteristics of increased resistance to UES trans-sphincteric flow observed in disorders that are accompanied by reduced UES opening. These pressure characteristics include increased hypopharyngeal intra-bolus as well as nadir deglutitive UES relaxation pressures. This model can potentially be helpful in better understanding of UES pathophysiology. The effect of external cricoid (UES restrictive) pressure on UES nadir pressure

337 Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES) Expedites Swallowing Recovery in Dysphagia Post-Acute Stroke: a Phase II Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction: Human disease models can help to better understand the pathophysiology and systematically characterize its consequences. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysphagia is a common sequela of a number of disorders including CVA, reflux disease and aging. Intrinsic disorders of the UES such as fibrosis and inflammation can result in its diminished distensibility and restrict its opening causing dysphagia. Aim: To characterize the pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena in an experimentally induced restricted UES model in humans. Methods: We studied 15 patients (8 male, age 65±11 years) with various supraesophageal reflux symptoms. To induce UES restriction, we used a handmade simple device comprised of two components that could be comfortably worn around the neck: an elastic band and a cushion (5 X 3 X 2.5 CM). The cushion was placed horizontally at the center of the cricoid cartilage. By adjusting the elastic band, we selectively applied 0, 20, 30, 40 mmHg pressure perpendicular to the cricoid laryngeal structure inducing equivalent resistance against UES opening. In this model, the UES, in addition to relaxation, has to overcome the externally imparted pressure to open. Deglutitive pharyngeal and UES pressure phenomena were determined using high-resolution manometry, which recorded from entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. We tested dry, 5 and 10ml swallows x 3. Results: Application of the external pressure band increased the length of the UES high pressure zone from 2.5 cm without the band to 3.1, 3.5 and 3.7 cm for 20, 30, 40mmHg cricoid restrictive pressure, respectively (p<0.05). Increased restrictive pressure against UES resulted in a significant increase in hypopharyngeal intra-bolus pressure (IBP) during all swallowed volumes (figure). Similarly, increased UES restrictive pressure resulted in increased UES nadir deglutitive relaxation pressure for all swallowed volumes (table, p<0.05). Swallowed volume had no effect on pharyngeal peak pressure, duration or velocity. None of these were affected by restrictive external UES pressures. Deglutitive velopharygeal pressure progressively increased with increased swallowed volume (p<0.05). These pressures were also not affected by UES restrictive external pressure. Conclusions: Acute experimental restriction of UES opening by external cricoid pressure in humans manifests the pressure characteristics of increased resistance to UES trans-sphincteric flow observed in disorders that are accompanied by reduced UES opening. These pressure characteristics include increased hypopharyngeal intra-bolus as well as nadir deglutitive UES relaxation pressures. This model can potentially be helpful in better understanding of UES pathophysiology. The effect of external cricoid (UES restrictive) pressure on UES nadir pressure

336 A Human Model of Restricted UES Opening and Its Characteristic Pharyngeal and UES Deglutitive Pressure Phenomena

Introduction: Human disease models can help to better understand the pathophysiology and systematically characterize its consequences. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysphagia is a common sequela of a number of disorders including CVA, reflux disease and aging. Intrinsic disorders of the UES such as fibrosis and inflammation can result in its diminished distensibility and restrict its opening causing dysphagia. Aim: To characterize the pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena in an experimentally induced restricted UES model in humans. Methods: We studied 15 patients (8 male, age 65±11 years) with various supraesophageal reflux symptoms. To induce UES restriction, we used a handmade simple device comprised of two components that could be comfortably worn around the neck: an elastic band and a cushion (5 X 3 X 2.5 CM). The cushion was placed horizontally at the center of the cricoid cartilage. By adjusting the elastic band, we selectively applied 0, 20, 30, 40 mmHg pressure perpendicular to the cricoid laryngeal structure inducing equivalent resistance against UES opening. In this model, the UES, in addition to relaxation, has to overcome the externally imparted pressure to open. Deglutitive pharyngeal and UES pressure phenomena were determined using high-resolution manometry, which recorded from entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. We tested dry, 5 and 10ml swallows x 3. Results: Application of the external pressure band increased the length of the UES high pressure zone from 2.5 cm without the band to 3.1, 3.5 and 3.7 cm for 20, 30, 40mmHg cricoid restrictive pressure, respectively (p<0.05). Increased restrictive pressure against UES resulted in a significant increase in hypopharyngeal intra-bolus pressure (IBP) during all swallowed volumes (figure). Similarly, increased UES restrictive pressure resulted in increased UES nadir deglutitive relaxation pressure for all swallowed volumes (table, p<0.05). Swallowed volume had no effect on pharyngeal peak pressure, duration or velocity. None of these were affected by restrictive external UES pressures. Deglutitive velopharygeal pressure progressively increased with increased swallowed volume (p<0.05). These pressures were also not affected by UES restrictive external pressure. Conclusions: Acute experimental restriction of UES opening by external cricoid pressure in humans manifests the pressure characteristics of increased resistance to UES trans-sphincteric flow observed in disorders that are accompanied by reduced UES opening. These pressure characteristics include increased hypopharyngeal intra-bolus as well as nadir deglutitive UES relaxation pressures. This model can potentially be helpful in better understanding of UES pathophysiology. The effect of external cricoid (UES restrictive) pressure on UES nadir pressure

SIG 13 Perspectives Vol. 21, No. 2, June 2012

SIG 13 Perspectives Vol. 21, No. 2, June 2012

Movement of the upper esophageal sphincter and a manometric device during deglutition. A cineradiographic investigation.

A cineradiographic examination of 9 healthy subjects showed asynchronous movement of a manometric device in relation to movement of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) during deglutition. A single sensor placed within the UES high pressure zone at rest registered pressures existing outside this zone during the major part of deglutition. The manometric device must therefore comprise at least three sensors placed at different levels and about 10 mm apart if consistent pressure recording within this zone is to be achieved. In order to evaluate the pressure profile within the sphincter adequately, cineradiographic determination of the orientation of the measuring device is necessary. This was made possible by insertion of two mutually perpendicular radiopaque indicators into the catheter.