Unvaccinated Gilts Research Articles

Initial vaccination and revaccination with Type I PRRS 94881 MLV reduces viral load and infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

BackgroundPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) causes respiratory distress in pigs, reproductive failure in breeding-age gilts and sows, and can have devastating economic consequences in domestic herds. Several PRRS vaccines are available commercially. This study compared the effectiveness of single-vaccination and revaccination schedules using the PRRS 94881 Type I modified live virus (MLV) vaccine ReproCyc® PRRS EU with no vaccination (challenge control) in protecting against a PRRS virus (PRRSV) challenge in non-pregnant gilts.ResultsData were available from 48 gilts across three groups: a challenge control group (n = 16), which received no vaccination; a revaccination group (n = 16), which received ReproCyc® PRRS EU on Days 0 and 56; and a single vaccination group (n = 16), which received ReproCyc® PRRS EU on Day 56. All gilts were PRRSV RNA-negative (based on reverse transcription and quantitative polymerase chain reaction [RT-qPCR]) and PRRSV seronegative (based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) at Day 0. All gilts were challenged with PRRSV strain 190136 on Day 91.Viral RNA loads in both vaccination groups were significantly reduced compared with the challenge control group on Days 98 (P < 0.0001) and 101 (P < 0.0001), indicating that vaccinated gilts were better able to respond to challenge than unvaccinated gilts. At all timepoints following challenge, mean viral RNA load and the percentage of PRRSV RNA-positive gilts were numerically higher in the single-vaccination group than in the revaccination group; these differences were statistically significant on Day 101 (P = 0.0434). Furthermore, viremia levels after challenge were significantly lower in the revaccination group than in the single-vaccination group based on median area under the curve (AUC) values for viral RNA load from Day 91 to Day 112, suggesting that revaccinated gilts had better protection from viral infection than gilts who received a single vaccination. Protection from viremia did not correlate with the proportion of seropositive gilts on Day 91. In the single-vaccination group, 94% of pigs were seropositive on Day 91 compared with 56% in the revaccination group. Vaccination was well tolerated and no safety concerns were identified.ConclusionsBoth single-vaccination and revaccination with ReproCyc® PRRS EU were effective in reducing PRRSV viremia post-challenge. These findings have important implications for herd management as both the single-vaccination and revaccination schedules protect against PRRSV challenge, with revaccination appearing to provide better protection from viremia than single vaccination.

Cross-protection of a modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-2 vaccine against a heterologous PRRSV-1 challenge in late-term pregnancy gilts

We have evaluated the cross-protection of a modified-live virus (MLV) vaccine based on porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-2, against a heterologous PRRSV-1 challenge in late term pregnancy gilts. Gilts were vaccinated 42 days prior to breeding and then challenged intranasally with PRRSV-1 at 93 days of gestation. No local or systemic adverse effects related to vaccination were observed in the vaccinated gilts throughout the study. Vaccination resulted in a longer gestation period, a higher number of live-born and weaned piglets, and a significant decrease in the number of stillborn piglets compared to the unvaccinated group. The PRRSV-2 MLV vaccine was also able to significantly reduce PRRSV-1 viremia. At the time of PRRSV-1 challenge, vaccinated gilts had significantly higher PRRSV-1 specific interferon-γ secreting cells but low neutralizing antibody titers against PRRSV-1 compared to unvaccinated gilts. This correlated with a reduction of PRRSV-1 viremia, indicating that cell-mediated rather than humoral immunity played a role in PRRSV-1 clearance from the blood. Fetal thymic tissues from vaccinated pregnant gilts had fewer PRRSV-1 positive cells compared to unvaccinated gilts. Taken together these results indicate that vaccination of gilts with PRRSV-2 MLV vaccine can provide cross-protection against PRRSV-1 challenge and improve reproductive performance.

Impact of a novel inactivated PRRS virus vaccine on virus replication and virus-induced pathology in fetal implantation sites and fetuses upon challenge

Preventing congenital infection is important for the control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS). Recently, in our laboratory, an inactivated porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine has been developed. Promising results in young pigs encouraged us to test the vaccine potency to prevent congenital infection. In the present study, the performance of this experimental inactivated vaccine was investigated in pregnant gilts. An advanced protocol was used to test the PRRSV vaccine efficacy. This protocol is based on recent insights in the pathogenesis of congenital PRRSV infections. Three gilts were vaccinated with an experimental PRRSV 07V63 inactivated vaccine at 27, 55, and 83 days of gestation. Three unvaccinated gilts were included as controls. At 90 days of gestation, all animals were intranasally inoculated with 105 tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) of PRRSV 07V63. Twenty days postchallenge animals were euthanized and sampled. The vaccinated gilts quickly developed virus neutralizing (VN) antibodies starting from 3 to 7 days postchallenge (1.0 to 5.0 log2). In contrast, the unvaccinated gilts remained negative for VN antibodies after challenge. The vaccinated gilts had shorter viremia than the control gilts. Gross pathology (mummification) was observed in 8% of the fetuses from vaccinated gilts and in 15% of the fetuses from unvaccinated gilts. The number of fetuses with severe microscopic lesions in the fetal implantation sites (a focal detachment of the trophoblast from the uterine epithelium; a focal, multifocal, or full degeneration of the fetal placenta) was lower in the vaccinated (19%) versus unvaccinated (45%) gilts (P < 0.05). The number of PRRS-positive cells in the fetal placentae was higher in unvaccinated versus vaccinated gilts (P < 0.05). In contrast, the number of PRRS-positive cells in the myometrium/endometrium was higher in vaccinated versus unvaccinated gilts (P < 0.05). Fifty-seven percent of the fetuses from the vaccinated gilts and 75% of the fetuses from the unvaccinated gilts were PRRSV-positive. In conclusion, implementation of the novel experimental inactivated PRRSV vaccine primed the VN antibody response and slightly reduced the duration of viremia in gilts. It also reduced the number of virus-positive fetuses and improved the fetal survival, but was not able to fully prevent congenital PRRSV infection. The reduction of fetal infection and pathology is most probably attributable to the vaccine-mediated decrease of PRRSV transfer from the endometrium to the fetal placenta.

Effets métaboliques du by-pass gastrique

Preventing congenital infection is important for the control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS). Recently, in our laboratory, an inactivated porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine has been developed. Promising results in young pigs encouraged us to test the vaccine potency to prevent congenital infection. In the present study, the performance of this experimental inactivated vaccine was investigated in pregnant gilts. An advanced protocol was used to test the PRRSV vaccine efficacy. This protocol is based on recent insights in the pathogenesis of congenital PRRSV infections. Three gilts were vaccinated with an experimental PRRSV 07V63 inactivated vaccine at 27, 55, and 83 days of gestation. Three unvaccinated gilts were included as controls. At 90 days of gestation, all animals were intranasally inoculated with 105 tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) of PRRSV 07V63. Twenty days postchallenge animals were euthanized and sampled. The vaccinated gilts quickly developed virus neutralizing (VN) antibodies starting from 3 to 7 days postchallenge (1.0 to 5.0 log2). In contrast, the unvaccinated gilts remained negative for VN antibodies after challenge. The vaccinated gilts had shorter viremia than the control gilts. Gross pathology (mummification) was observed in 8% of the fetuses from vaccinated gilts and in 15% of the fetuses from unvaccinated gilts. The number of fetuses with severe microscopic lesions in the fetal implantation sites (a focal detachment of the trophoblast from the uterine epithelium; a focal, multifocal, or full degeneration of the fetal placenta) was lower in the vaccinated (19%) versus unvaccinated (45%) gilts (P < 0.05). The number of PRRS-positive cells in the fetal placentae was higher in unvaccinated versus vaccinated gilts (P < 0.05). In contrast, the number of PRRS-positive cells in the myometrium/endometrium was higher in vaccinated versus unvaccinated gilts (P < 0.05). Fifty-seven percent of the fetuses from the vaccinated gilts and 75% of the fetuses from the unvaccinated gilts were PRRSV-positive. In conclusion, implementation of the novel experimental inactivated PRRSV vaccine primed the VN antibody response and slightly reduced the duration of viremia in gilts. It also reduced the number of virus-positive fetuses and improved the fetal survival, but was not able to fully prevent congenital PRRSV infection. The reduction of fetal infection and pathology is most probably attributable to the vaccine-mediated decrease of PRRSV transfer from the endometrium to the fetal placenta.

SEROLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF PARVOVIRUS INFECTION ON PIG FARMS

Porcine parvovirus (PPV) is one of the causative agents in reproductive disorders in swine that causes great economic losses. The objective of our research was to determine prevalence of this infection on farms with intensive breeding in 5 municipalities in Vojvodina. The research encompassed 19 herds with a total of 344 blood samples screened for the presence of antibodies against PPV (gilts, breeding sows and boars). Serological examination was carried out by haemagglutination inhibition test (HI test). After the analyses of the results, seropositive animals were detected on the farms and there were no PPV-free farms. The determined antibody titre against PPV ranged from 1:64 to 1:16384. Out of 344 examined animals, there were 305 (88.66%) with a high antibody titre (1:1024 to 1:16384). The highest level of antibodies (1:16384) was detected in 145 animals, what is 42.15% of total number. In 24 animals (6.97%) titre antibody was 1:512 and these animals were of low seropositivity. Simultaneously, a comparison of antibodies in blood sera was carried out on 20 gilts (Table 3, farm 2) originating from a farm where the animals were vaccinated against PPV and 20 unvaccinated gilts (Table 4, farm 1) originating from a farm without vaccination against PPV. In unvaccinated animals antibody titre was unequal and ranged from 1:256 to 1:16384, in unvaccinated animals the values were considerably higher and ranged from 1:4096 do 1:16384, and in 17 out of 20 vaccinated pigs (85%) the highest antibody titre was 1:16384.

Evaluation of a pcv2 vaccine on finishing pig growth performance and mortality rate (2007)

A total of 2,553 pigs (PIC L337 × C22) were used in two experiments in a commercial research barn to evaluate the effects of a commercially available Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2) vaccine on finisher pig growth rate, feed efficiency, and mortality rate. Pigs in Exp. 1 were vaccinated at 9 and 11 wk of age while pigs in Exp. 2 were vaccinated earlier at 5 and 7 wk of age. In Exp. 1, 1,300 pigs were individually weighed and the vaccine treatment administered 15 and 1 d before being placed on test in the finisher. In Exp. 2 1,253 pigs were used and randomly allotted based on nursery pen average pig weight and the vaccine treatment administered 41 and 27 d before being placed on test in the finisher. Pen weights were obtained on d 0 and every 2 weeks until the end of the trial. Feed intake was recorded on a pen basis. In Exp 1, growth rate, feed intake, feed efficiency, and mortality were improved (P<0.05) in vaccinated pigs compared to unvaccinated pigs. In Exp. 2, there was a vaccine by sex interaction (P<0.01) for ADG 2. The interaction was the result of the vaccine increasing ADG to a greater extent in barrows than in gilts. The interaction for ADG resulted in a vaccine by sex interaction for market weight (P<0.05). Vaccinated barrows were 10.6 lb heavier compared to unvaccinated control barrows while vaccinated gilts were only 2.1 lb heavier than unvaccinated gilts at market. In Exp. 2, ADFI and F/G were numerically better and mortality rate was decreased for vaccinated pigs compared to control pigs. In both experiments, mortality rates were lower (P<0.05) in vaccinated pigs. Vaccinated pigs had 2.6 and 5.9% less mortality than non-vaccinated pigs in Exp. 1 and 2, respectively. The commercial PCV2 vaccine used in this study was effective at reducing mortality and increasing growth rate in finisher pigs with histopathologic lesions suggestive of Porcine Circoviral Disease (PCVD).

Development of a vaccine preventing parvovirus‐induced reproductive failure in pigs

An inactivated porcine parvovirus (PPV) vaccine for the prevention of PPV-induced reproductive failure in pigs was developed, using virus grown in cell culture, inactivated with beta-propiolactone and adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide. The vaccine was tested for safety by subcutaneous injection into pregnant gilts. There were no signs of abnormal reactions nor evidence of PPV infection in the gilts or their foetuses when they were sacrificed 6 weeks after vaccination. To demonstrate that the vaccine was immunogenic, pigs were immunised either once or twice with 4 weeks between doses. Resulting antibody titres (haemagglutination inhibition - HAI) ranged from less than 8 to 64 (geometric mean of 30) after one dose of vaccine, and from 128 to 512 (geometric mean 256) after two doses. To demonstrate that the vaccine was protective, antibody-negative gilts were vaccinated twice, with 4 weeks between doses, joined after the second dose, and were then infected with virulent PPV 40 to 50 days after joining. In litters from 10 vaccinated gilts, none of 93 foetuses showed evidence of PPV infection. In contrast, in litters from two unvaccinated gilts, all 13 foetuses showed evidence of PPV infection and 10 of these were mummified. The average number of live piglets per litter was 9.2 from vaccinated gilts and 1.5 from unvaccinated gilts. The vaccine was therefore considered to be effective in preventing PPV reproductive failure in susceptible gilts.

Porcine parvovirus: propagation in microcarrier cell culture and immunogenic evaluation in pregnant gilts

Porcine parvovirus was propagated in PK-15 cells cultured in roller bottles or on microcarrier beads. After inactivation, the virus was used as antigen in the preparation of vaccines. The immunogenic potency and safety of the vaccines were evaluated in specific pathogen free pregnant gilts and guinea pigs. Experimental challenge tests determined the efficacy of the vaccine in preventing porcine parvovirus transplacental infection. Neither viral antigens nor specific antibodies were detected in fetuses from vaccinated gilts. In contrast, fetal death and, or, mummification occurred when unvaccinated gilts were infected. Both virus and, or, antibodies were also detected in fetuses from these unvaccinated gilts. Serum conversion after vaccination was assayed by microserum neutralisation using guinea pig erythrocytes as cell indicators and by haemagglutination inhibition tests. Viral antigens in fetal tissues were detected using ELISA, the immunobeads technique, the haemagglutination test and by virus isolation.

Vaccination against Aujeszky's disease: field experiences.

Twelve herds were investigated where outbreaks of clinical Aujeszky's disease had occurred. Clinical Aujeszky's disease was eliminated from all farms following vaccination. After vaccination was stopped in two of the six fattening herds virus was also apparently eradicated, judging from serological examination. These two herds were the smallest of the six fattening farms and size and the throughput of pigs may have contributed to apparent eradication of virus. In two of six breeding farms where controlled vaccination is still practised unvaccinated gilts and boars were seronegative. In this case possible eradication of infection may have resulted from either no excretion or insufficient production of virus from vaccinates to infect susceptible non-vaccinates. It is postulated that a properly controlled and monitored vaccination and culling programme may result in the eradication of disease and perhaps also infection from breeding herds experiencing Aujeszky's disease.

An inactivated, oil-emulsion vaccine for the prevention of porcine parvovirus-induced reproductive failure

Pig fetuses inoculated at 45 days gestation with virulent porcine parvovirus (PPV) were harvested 10 days later. Virus was extracted, inactivated with binary ethylenimine and the antigen suspension emulsified with mineral oil adjuvant. One dose of this vaccine, or two doses with a 14 day interval, stimulated high and long lasting serum antibody titres in gilts. Vaccination caused no clinical reactions and lesions at injection sites were minor. Vaccination of seronegative gilts at 40 days gestation caused no adverse effects on fetuses. Six gilts which had been vaccinated five to nine weeks before mating were challenged intravenously with live, virulent PPV at 40 days gestation. At 98 days gestation 78 out of 84 (93 per cent) fetuses were alive and normal and no evidence of PPV infection was found in the six dead (mummified) fetuses. In four unvaccinated gilts similarly challenged with PPV at 40 days gestation only five out of 51 (10 per cent) fetuses survived to 98 days gestation and the virus was detected in 41 of the 46 dead (mummified) fetuses. This vaccine appears to be safe and effective for prevention of PPV-induced fetal loss in gilts.

Cross-protection studies between feline infectious peritonitis and porcine transmissible gastroenteritis viruses

Cross-protection studies between the feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) and the porcine transmissible gastroenteritis (TGE) viruses were conducted in cats, pigs and pregnant gilts. Cats vaccinated with TGE virus developed neutralizing antibodies against TGE virus and low titer antibody against FIP virus detected by an indirect fluorescent antibody technique but were not protected against a virulent FIP virus challenge. Baby pigs and pregnant gilts vaccinated with FIP virus did not develop detectable antibodies to TGE virus. Nevertheless, it appeared that vaccination of swine with FIP virus conferred some immunity against TGE virus infection. Seventeen-day-old pigs vaccinated with two doses of FIP virus had a 67% survival rate following a virulent TGE virus challenge, and 75% of the 3-day-old pigs suckling either FIP or TGE-virus-vaccinated gilts survived virulent TGE virus infection in contrast to 0% survival of baby pigs suckling unvaccinated gilts.