Research Article| December 01 2019 Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Steroids in Croup AAP Grand Rounds (2019) 42 (6): 68. https://doi.org/10.1542/gr.42-6-68 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Steroids in Croup. AAP Grand Rounds December 2019; 42 (6): 68. https://doi.org/10.1542/gr.42-6-68 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All PublicationsAll JournalsAAP Grand RoundsPediatricsHospital PediatricsPediatrics In ReviewNeoReviewsAAP NewsAll AAP Sites Search Advanced Search Topics: comparative effectiveness research, croup, steroids, prednisone Source: Parker CM, Cooper, MN. Prednisolone versus dexamethasone for croup: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2019; 144(3): e20183772; doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3772Google Scholar Investigators at multiple Australian institutions conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of 3 oral steroid regimens in the treatment of croup. Patients were eligible if they presented to 1 of 2 study EDs between 2009–2012, were clinically diagnosed with croup, and were >6 months old. Patients were excluded if they had a known steroid allergy or were already on oral steroids. Demographics of enrolled participants were collected at baseline. Participants were randomized to receive either 0.6 mg/kg dexamethasone (DEX), low-dose (0.15 mg/kg) dexamethasone (LD-DEX), or 1 mg/kg prednisolone (PRED). Staff and patients were blinded to treatment allocation. Each participant was assessed at baseline and 1-hour post-treatment using a validated measure of croup severity: the Westley croup score (WCS). The WCS is scored from 0–17, with higher scores indicating higher severity. Participant caregivers were contacted at 4 weeks to assess subsequent unscheduled medical visits within 7 days after treatment. The primary outcomes were WCS scores at 1 hour and unscheduled medical visits within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included the use of nebulized epinephrine and the need for additional steroid doses. Investigators performed a noninferiority analysis for the WCS score outcome, with noninferiority specified as the upper bound of the 95% CI not exceeding a WCS score of 0.5. There were 1,231 participants included in analyses, with 410 assigned to DEX, 410 to LD-DEX, and 411 to PRED. The baseline mean WCS scores were 1.4 in the DEX group, 1.5 in the LD-DEX group, and 1.5 in the PRED group. There were no significant differences in demographics between participants in each group. Mean WCS scores at 1 hour were 0.43, 0.48, and 0.49 in the DEX, LD-DEX, and PRED groups, respectively. Compared to DEX, these WCS scores in LD-DEX and PRED groups were not significantly different and had upper 95% CI bounds within the prespecified 0.5 margin. There was also no difference between groups in unscheduled medical visits (17.8%, 19.5%, and 21.7% for the DEX, LD-DEX, and PRED groups, respectively; P=.19) or the need for nebulized epinephrine. The proportion receiving additional steroid doses was different by treatment group (11.3% in the DEX group, 15.1% in the LD-DEX group, and 18.9% in the PRED group; P=.04). The investigators conclude that LD-DEX and PRED are as effective for the treatment of croup as dexamethasone, though more doses may be required. Dr Bechtel has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device. The current study is well-designed (prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled) to evaluate if a single dose of either PRED (1 mg/kg/dose) or oral LD-DEX (0.15 mg/kg/dose) is “not inferior” or “not acceptably less efficacious”1 to a single dose of oral DEX (0.6 mg/kg/dose), the usual dosing for children with infectious croup.2... You do not currently have access to this content.
Read full abstract