Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Research Articles

ASO Author Reflections: Enhancing Treatment Outcomes in Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through Immunochemotherapy.

ASO Author Reflections: Enhancing Treatment Outcomes in Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through Immunochemotherapy.

Induction Immunochemotherapy Yields a Higher Conversion Rate and Better Overall Survival than Chemotherapy in Initially Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

This study compared the surgical conversion rate and overall survival (OS) between induction chemotherapy (iC) and induction immunochemotherapy (iIC) for patients with initially unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (iuESCC). In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, patients from four high-volume institutions with unresectable diseases were included. The primary endpoints were the conversion surgery rate and OS. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent significant prognostic factors associated with OS. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to confirm the survival comparison between the iIC and iC cohorts. A total of 309 patients (150 in the iIC cohort and 159 in the iC cohort) were included. A significantly higher conversion surgical rate was observed in the iIC cohort (iIC vs. iC: 127/150, 84.7% vs. 79/159, 49.7%, P < 0.001). The pathological complete response rates were 22.0% and 5.1% in the iIC and the iC cohorts, respectively (P = 0.001). A significant difference in the OS was observed between the iIC (not reached) and iC cohorts (median 95% CI 36.3 [range 27.2-45.5]). The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting yielded similar results. Regimen (iIC vs. iC, HR 0.215, 95% CI 0.102-0.454, P < 0.001) and operation (yes vs. no, HR 0.262, 95% CI 0.161-0.427, P < 0.001) were the significant prognostic factors for OS. Immunochemotherapy plus conversion surgery in the induction setting may be a better treatment option to achieve high pathological responses and improve OS in iuESCC patients.

LEAP-014: first-line lenvatinib+ pembrolizumab+chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Treatment options for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are improving. Current guidelines recommend first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic ESCC, which has led to improvements in survival outcomes. Antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can act synergistically to convert the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to an immune supportive microenvironment, thus enhancing antitumor immune responses. In preclinical models, the antiangiogenic agent lenvatinib combined with an anti-PD-1 agent showed synergistic antitumor activity. We describe the design and rationale for the randomized, open-label, phase III LEAP-014 study of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. Overall survival and progression-free survival are the dual primary end points. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04949256 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CheckMate 648): 29-month follow-up from a randomized, open-label, phase III trial.

First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab both demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the CheckMate 648 trial, leading to approvals of both nivolumab-containing regimens in many countries. We report longer-term follow-up data. This open-label, phase III trial (NCT03143153) enrolled adults with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥1% and then in the overall population. A total of 970 patients were randomly assigned. After 29 months of minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate improvement in OS versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59 [95% CI: 0.46-0.76]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.65-0.93]) and with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.62 [95% CI: 0.48-0.80]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.65-0.92]). In patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated PFS benefit versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.89]); PFS benefit was not observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.79-1.36]). Among all treated patients (n = 936), Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 151 (49%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy), 105 (32%, nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and 110 (36%, chemotherapy) patients. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS benefit versus chemotherapy with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up, further supporting use as first-line standard treatment options for patients with advanced ESCC.

Abstract 5208: Dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA and T cell receptor repertoire predict disease progression in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Background: Patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) showed variations in their response to treatments and experienced inevitable disease progression. The development of non-invasive and clinically viable biomarkers is urgently needed. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in these patients. Methods: A total of 21 ESCC patients who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy, or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-combined therapy from October 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Baseline tumor samples were collected for genomic profiling using targeted NGS. Baseline and post-therapy plasma were collected for genomic and TCR profiling. Results: We found that ctDNA detection rates were significantly reduced after treatment (P&amp;lt;0.001). Post-treatment ctDNA positivity were associated with worse local recurrence-free survival (P=0.001) and progression-free survival (P=0.001), but not overall survival. Moreover, TCR clonality was significantly increased after treatment, including CDR3 diversity (P=0.003), TCR clonotype (P=0.004), and VJ pairs (P=0.010), indicating an increased T cell expansion and complexity. Specifically, we identified two increased and four reduced VJ rearrangements after treatment, and the four reduced VJ rearrangements (Vβ12-2Jβ2-4, Vβ6-9Jβ1-5, Vβ6-7Jβ1-5, and Vβ6-9Jβ1-1) were significantly associated with worse progression-free survival. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the prognostic implication of plasma ctDNA and TCR profiles in patients with unresectable ESCC receiving definitive therapy, supporting the future development of non-invasive monitoring of disease progression in these patients. Citation Format: Baidong Zhang, Xiang Zhan, Qiang Li, Chenxuan Wang, Jiaohui Pang, Yaru Zhang, Song Wang, Qiuxiang Ou, Haimeng Tang, Alei Feng, Zhe Yang. Dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA and T cell receptor repertoire predict disease progression in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5208.

Benefits of camrelizumab plus carboplatin and albumin paclitaxel as induction therapy for locally advanced borderline resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin in the neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 27 patients with borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment with camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2020 to March 2022. Of these, 20 patients underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant treatment. Overall, 88.9% (24/27) of patients completed neoadjuvant treatment. The objective response rate was 79.2% (19/24) according to the RECIST criteria. Of the 20 patients who underwent surgery, the R0 resection rate was 95%, and 35% (7/20) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). During neoadjuvant treatment, 30% (6/20) of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and 20% (4/20) had grade ≥3 postoperative complications. There were no cases of reoperation or perioperative mortality. Camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin were found to be safe and effective in the neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. It was observed to improve the rate of curative resection without increasing perioperative complications.

Camrelizumab combined with apatinib for unresectable, metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center, single-arm, prospective study.

The prognosis for esophageal cancer (EC), a common malignant tumor, is poor. The new oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor apatinib has shown an excellent therapeutic effect on treating EC. Camrelizumab is a humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor with high affinity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced EC. The new combination strategy of anti-angiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy has great application prospects in the treatment of tumors. We aimed to assess camrelizumab in combination with apatinib as a new combination regimen for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this study, we recruited patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, with pathologically confirmed unresectable, locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Each patient received an intravenous infusion of camrelizumab 200 mg and oral administration of apatinib 250 mg once a day, every 21 days, as a cycle until disease progression, intolerance, or death. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), while the Kaplan-Meier method and LIFETEST procedure were used to estimate survival functions for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used to evaluate adverse events. Between December 1, 2019 and July 31, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, with 29 patients in the efficacy and safety analysis. The ORR was 34.5%, and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 82.8%. Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI: 11.2-16.2), and the estimated 6-, 9-, and 12-month OS rates were 85.5% (95% CI: 65.7-94.3%), 80.9% (95% CI: 60.3-91.5%), and 67.0% (95% CI: 43.8-82.4%), respectively. Median PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.0-13.6). The most prominent grade ≥3 adverse events associated with treatments were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase (10.3%), hypertension (10.3%), and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (CCEP) (6.9%), and no deaths occurred due to adverse events. Among patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, camrelizumab combined with apatinib showed a reasonable remission rate and survival benefit with a manageable safety profile.

A quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis comparing nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (N+CT) versus CT in patients (pts) with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): CheckMate 648.

251 Background: In CheckMate 648, pts with advanced ESCC treated with first-line N+I or N+CT had significantly longer overall survival (OS) vs CT and maintained quality of life (QoL) with no new safety signals. Here we compare between-treatment differences in quality-adjusted survival using a Q-TWiST analysis in all randomized pts (29-month minimum follow-up). Methods: Survival time was partitioned into 3 health states: toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (TWiST), and relapse (REL). TOX was defined as time spent with all-cause grade 3/4 adverse events after randomization, prior to disease progression. TWiST was defined as time prior to REL where pts did not experience TOX. REL was defined as time between disease progression and death, or the last known date alive. Mean duration of time in each state was calculated for each treatment group using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Utility values from the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire were used to adjust the time spent within each health state for QoL and to calculate Q-TWiST as the utility-weighted sum of the mean health state durations. Bootstrapping (500 samples) was used to estimate time in each health state and to compare mean Q-TWiST estimates between treatments. A between-group difference in Q-TWiST of 5 weeks was prespecified as being clinically important (defined as 10% of OS; based on a median OS in CT group of 10.7 months). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using different combinations of prespecified utility weights for each health state. Results: 970 pts were randomized 1:1:1 to N+I (n = 325), N+CT (n = 321), or CT (n = 324) and included in the Q-TWiST analysis. Median duration of follow-up for survivors was 155 weeks. Mean time in each health state was significantly longer for pts treated with N+I or N+CT compared to CT (Table). Between-group differences in Q-TWiST score were considered clinically important: 5.7 weeks (95% CI 5.5–6.0) favoring N+I vs CT and 7.6 weeks (95% CI 7.4–7.9) favoring N+CT vs CT. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Conclusions: In CheckMate 648, pts with unresectable advanced ESCC treated with N+I or N+CT had significantly longer OS compared with those treated with CT. Quality-adjusted survival using Q-TWiST also significantly favored N+I and N+CT compared to CT alone. Pts treated with N+I and N+CT not only experienced increased survival time, but also better QoL during their survival time. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153 . [Table: see text]

The efficacy and safety of conversion therapy after initial systemic chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer with distant metastases: A multicenter retrospective observational study.

310 Background: Systemic chemotherapy, with or without radiation, has been the standard treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with distant metastasis. The increased efficacy of multimodality treatment allows for the consideration of conversion therapy with curative intent for initially unresectable ESCC after initial treatment. In the present study, we examined the safety and effectiveness of conversion therapy for ESCC. Methods: Conversion therapy was defined as surgery or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) aiming at cure after initial treatment for tumors that were initially unresectable due to distant metastasis. The patients who underwent conversion therapy for ESCC between 2011 and 2021 at participating institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patient backgrounds, treatment outcomes, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: From 22 institutions, 149 patients were enrolled. As defined, all patients received systemic chemotherapy as an initial treatment. The distant metastatic sites in para-aortic lymph nodes/extra regional mediastinal lymph nodes/lung/liver/bone/others were 81(54%)/19 (13%)/14 (9%)/11 (7%)/4 (3%)/20 (14%), respectively. After the initial treatment, 116 patients underwent surgery and 33 patients received CRT as conversion therapy. Of 116 patients who underwent conversion surgery, the incidence rate of postoperative pneumonia/leakage/recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was 16%/7%/6%, respectively. R0 resection was obtained in 87%. Regarding the non-hematological toxicities during conversion CRT (CTCAE grade 3 or higher), decreased appetite/dysphagia/esophagitis was 21%/15%/9%, respectively. No grade 4 or higher hematologic toxicities were observed. The 3-year OS (3y-OS) rate for all patients was 41.9%; no significant differences were found between surgery and CRT groups (43.3% vs 37.0%, p = 0.112). Pathological responders showed a significantly longer OS than non-responders (3y-OS, 56.4% vs 36.1%, p = 0.010). The distribution or number of distant metastases were not identified as prognostic factors. Conclusions: This study showed that conversion therapy for ESCC patients with distant metastasis could be conducted safely and have a favorable prognosis. Since its survival benefit would depend on the pathological response, it is important to develop an indicator to predict pathological response before surgery and carefully select appropriate candidates of conversion therapy in ESCC.

Efficacy of Nimotuzumab plus Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy for Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Real-World Study

The esophageal cancer ranked 7th in the morbidity of malignant cancer and the 6th contributed to carcinoma deaths. Most patients are diagnosed of advanced stage at first visiting. The 5-year survival rate of unresectable esophageal cancer is about 20% after the standard treatment of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Nimotuzumab, a humanized anti-EGFR antibody, has shown good efficacy and low toxicity in epithelial tumors. This two-center, real-world study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Totally 503 eligible unresectable ESCC patients from Jan 2014 to Dec 2020 were included. 1:2 nearest neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the Nimo group (nimotuzumab plus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy) and CRT group (concurrent chemo-radiotherapy), and the covariates included age, gender, tumor location, lesion length, TNM stage, clinical stage, and radiotherapy dose. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). A total of 61 patients were in Nimo group which received nimotuzumab (200 mg/w, 4-6 weeks) combined with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (chemotherapy: S-1/FP/TP/DP for 2-4 cycles; radiotherapy: 2DRT,3D-CRT or IMRT, 50-70 Gy in 25-35 fractions) and 107 patients in CRT group only received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The efficacy of Nimo group was better than that of CRT group. The ORR was 85.2% vs. 71.0%, (P=0.037), the DCR was 98.4% vs. 91.6%, (P>0.05). The median PFS was 28.07 months vs. 19.54 months, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year PFS rates were 78.2% vs. 72.9%, 37.5% vs. 28.3%, and 29.1% vs. 21.3%, respectively (HR: 0.6860, 95% CI: 0.4902-0.9600, P=0.034). The median OS was 34.93 months vs. 24.30 months and the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 88.5% vs. 81.3%, 46.8% vs. 35.2% and 37.4% vs. 28.0%, respectively (HR: 0.6701, 95% CI: 0.4792-0.9372, P=0.024). The adverse events including radiation esophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, bone marrow suppression, nausea, vomiting, and rash were no significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Nimotuzumab combined with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy improved the ORR, and prolonged PFS and OS in unresectable ESCC patients with a good tolerance.

Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin in Patients with Locally Advanced Borderline Resectable or Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) plus cisplatin as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in locally advanced borderline resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with locally advanced ESCC (cT3-4, Nany, M0-1, M1 was limited to lymph node metastasis in the supraclavicular area) were enrolled. All the patients received the cCRT of nab-PTX plus cisplatin. After the cCRT, those resectable patients received esophagectomy; those unresectable patients continued to receive the definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). The locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate and adverse events (AEs) were calculated. A total of 45 patients with ESCC treated from October 2019 to May 2021 were finally included. The median follow-up time was 30.3 months. The LRC, OS, EFS, DMFS at 1and 2 years were 81.5%, 86.6%, 64.3%, 73.2% and 72.4%, 68.8%, 44.8%, 52.7% respectively. 21 patients (46.7%) received conversional chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (cCRT+S). The pCR rate and R0 resection rate were 47.6% and 84.0%. The LRC rate at 1 and 2 years were 95.0%, 87.1% in cCRT+S patients and 69.3%, 58.7% in dCRT patients respectively (HR, 5.14; 95% CI, 1.10-23.94; P = 0.021). The OS rate at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% and 84.2% in resectable patients compared to 78.8% and 54.4% in unresectable patients (HR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.10-10.61; P = 0.024). The toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were tolerated, the most common grade 3-4 toxicities were radiation esophagitis (15.6%). Nab-PTX plus cisplatin were effective and safe as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy of ESCC. The patients receiving conversional chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (cCRT+S) were prone to have a better survival.

PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for stage IV ESCC

To evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy and tolerability of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients at stage IV in a real-world cohort. All unresectable ESCC patients at stage IV who initiated first-line therapy with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy between August 2018 and March 2021 in a general hospital in China were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Propensity score matching (1:1) with control patients receiving chemotherapy alone was performed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. In this study, fifty patients (n = 25 each group) were included, all of whom could be evaluated for efficacy. PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy exhibited better OS than chemotherapy alone (median 15.8 vs 12.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46 [95% CI 0.23–0.95]; P = 0.036). The median PFS for the PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy group was 8.7 months compared with 6.1 months for the chemotherapy group (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.26–0.90]; P = 0.014). Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or above related to treatment were found in 24.0% and 32.0% of the PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone groups, respectively. PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy exhibited durable anti-tumor activity and relatively controllable safety as first-line therapy for unresectable ESCC patients at stage IV, but these results need to be confirmed by further research.

Predictive values of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet score (HALP) and the modified -Gustave Roussy immune score for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy

The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score and the Gustave Roussy immune score (GRIm⁃Score) are prognostic markers in several types of malignant tumors. The prognostic values of HALP score and GRIm⁃Score in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer remain unknown. MethodsWe enrolled 150 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our institution between 2013 and 2018. The cutoff values for HALP, and GRIm⁃Score were defined by using receiver’s operating characteristic curves. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan– Meier method, with differences analyzed with the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of HALP and GRIm for ESCC. ResultsHALP was significantly associated with the Zubrod ECOG WHO performance status, tumor location, and the clinical tumor, node, metastasis stage. Modified GRIm (mGRIm) was only significantly associated with metastasis / recurrence before radiotherapy (χ2 = 6.25). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that higher mGRIm (HR 1.9 95%CI 1.3–2.9) and lower HALP (HR 2.4 95%CI 1.6–3.7) were all associated with worse OS. Multivariate COX analysis found that higher mGRIm score (HR 1.7 95%CI 1.1–2.6), and lower HALP score (HR 2 95%CI 1.3–3.2) were both independent risk factors of overall survival. The nomogram c-index in inside validation was 0.66. ConclusionBoth HALP and mGRIm are independent prognostic factors for patients with unresectable ESCC.

Induction immunochemotherapy conversion rate and survival outcomes versus chemotherapy in initially unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

e16077 Background: Currently, no comparative study has been reported to elucidate whether the addition of immunotherapy in the induction setting could improve treatment efficacy and prolong the overall survival of initially-unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (iuESCC). This study aimed to compare surgical conversion rate and short-term overall survival in induction chemotherapy (iC) and induction immunochemotherapy (iIC) for patients with iuESCC. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with the guideline-defined unresectable disease were included at four high-volume institutions. The primary endpoints were conversion surgical rate and overall survival (OS). Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as the disappearance of tumor cells in the primary lesion site. Multivariate cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent significant prognostic factors associated with OS. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to confirm the survival comparison between iIC and iC cohorts. Results: A total of 309 patients (150 in iIC and 159 in iC cohort) were included. A significantly higher conversion surgical rate was observed in iIC cohort (iIC vs. iC: 127/150, 84.7% vs. 79/159, 49.7%, P &lt; 0.001). In terms of pathological response, the rates of pCR were 22.0% and 5.1% in the iIC and the iC cohort, respectively (P = 0.001). A significant difference in OS was observed between iIC (not reached) and iC cohorts (median [95% CI]: 36.3 [27.2 – 45.5] months). The stabilized IPTW yielded similar results. Regimen (iIC vs. iC, HR 0.215, 95% CI: 0.102 - 0.454, P &lt; 0.001) and operation (Yes vs. No, HR 0.262, 95% CI: 0.161 - 0.427, P &lt; 0.001) were the significant prognostic factors for OS. Further, subgroup analysis revealed that significantly higher OS was seen in iIC cohort than that in the iC cohort (P = 0.003) in patients who had non-pCR disease. Conclusions: Immunochemotherapy plus conversion surgery in the induction setting had higher pathological response rate and better OS in iuESCC patients. Moreover, this combined modality also contributed to improving OS in patients with residual tumor burden. This study provided evidence for future randomized control trial designs.

Phase II trial of terelizumab combined with radiotherapy of locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: TREC trial.

e16086 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC)，However, some patients cannot tolerate or are unwilling to CCRT. The aim of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of the tirelizumab combined with radiotherapy in patients of locally advanced unresectable ESCC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria were as follows: ESCC of clinical stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa; aged 18 to 90 years; cannot tolerate or are unwilling to CCRT; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; and performed radiotherapy: Involvement field irradiation, nodal GTV (GTVn) (regional lymphatic metastasis) radiotherapy dose 60Gy, the esophageal gross tumor volume (GTVt) radiotherapy dose 50Gy, if the gastroscope pathology is completely relieved, otherwise it is 60Gy. All patients registered before radiotherapy. The patient received concurrent therapy with tirelizumab (200mg every time, 3-week cycle), until the disease progresses or clinical benefits are lost (the longest time is 12 months). The primary endpoint was the esophageal gross tumor pathological complete remission rate (pCR). Results: Between 01 August 2021 and 31 December 2022, 31 patients were enrolled, and 27 completed radiotherapy and at least two times of tirelizumab treatment. Data cutoff date was 31 January 2023, median follow-up time among survivors after radiotherapy was 9 months (range 4-20). The esophageal gross tumor pCR rate was 66.7% (95% CI, 14.3%-52.3%) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of low severity (grade 1-2, 48.1%; grade 3, 7.4%; grade 4-5, no). No treatment-related mortality occurred. Two (7.4%) patients had tumor recurrence and two (7.4%) patients died (Infection and heart disease). The 1-year PFS rate, median PFS and median OS had not been reached yet. For locally advanced unresectable ESCC that can't receive CCRT, the combination of tirelizumab and radiotherapy shows promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity, providing a feasible and effective choice. The research of long-term survival analysis is under way. Conclusions: Concurrent radiotherapy with tirelizumab shows promising efficacy and controllable safety for patients with locally advanced ESCC who are unable or unwilling to undergo CCRT, and warrants further evaluation in larger studies. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100053182 .

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with nivolumab in the treatment of advanced upper gastrointestinal tumor as second-line or later-line therapy: The results of gastric cancer cohort.

e16015 Background: The upper gastrointestinal tumors, such as gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), have high rates of incidence and poor prognosis in our country, lacking of efficient therapy after failure of first-line regimen. Despite available treatment, there are still huge unmet medical needs of second-line or later-line therapy for patients with GAC or ESCC. Therefore, we will investigate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib Hydrochloride (a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor) combined with Nivolumab (PD-1 antibody) in GAC and ESCC. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic GAC or ESCC who have failed standard therapy were treated by Anlotinib Hydrochloride 12mg/day orally for two weeks and Nivolumab 360mg every 3 week until the disease progression or intolerable adverse effects occurring. The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT04503967,07/08/2020). The primary endpoint of this study was ORR (Objective Response Rate). The secondary endpoints were PFS (Progression-Free Survival), OS (Overall Survival), DCR (Disease Control Rate), and safety. Results: Gastric adenocarcinoma cohort would be reported only. From December 2020 to September 2022, 45 patients were enrolled in gastric adenocarcinoma cohort. There were 34 male patients and 11 female patients. The median age was 59 years. The percentage of gastric cancer patients with second-line and later-line treatment were 62.2% and 37.8%, respectively. 2 patients (4.4%) achieved complete remission (CR), 11 patients (24.4%) got partial remission (PR), and 15 patients (33.3%) got stable disease (SD). The ORR (CR+PR) was 28.9%, and DCR (CR+PR+SD) was 62.2%. Among 28 patients (62.2%) treated as second-line therapy, ORR was 32.1%, and DCR was 57.0%. As for later-line therapy of 17 patients, ORR and DCR were 23.5% and 70.6%, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 15.0 months (95% CI 8.17~21.83), then median PFS was 3.80±0.94 months, and median OS was 11.10±3.04 months. When the patients were treated as second-line therapy, median PFS was 3.0±0.97 months, and median OS was 14.50±3.89 months. Median PFS and OS in later-line patients of gastric adenocarcinoma were 3.80±1.30 months and 8.0±0.68 months, respectively. 36 patients (80%) had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). More than 10% of incidence rate included hypothyroidism (n=8), liver dysfunction (n=6), and rash (n=6). G3-4 of TRAEs were hypothyroidism (n=1), liver dysfunction (n=1), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n=1), rash (n=1), and hypophysitis (n=1). Conclusions: Anlotinib hydrochloride combined with Nivolumab showed effective clinical response and tolerable safety in second-line or later-line treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04503967 .

Nivolumab combination therapy as first-line treatments for unresectable, advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

ABSTRACT Introduction Esophageal cancers continue to confer a dismal prognosis. Targeted and immune therapies have skyrocketed in the world of cancer management. Unlike other solid tumors, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has lacked effective targeted therapy. Promising outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently changed ESCC management. Areas covered Nivolumab has been granted several approvals to treat ESCC patients. Nivolumab is recommended as adjuvant therapy for localized ESCC patients following trimodality therapy who have residual cancer in the surgical specimen (lymph node(s) and or the primary). CheckMate-648 led to dual ICI therapy approval with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab plus platinum with fluoropyrimidine as first-line treatment for unresectable ESCC patients. ATTRACTION-3 resulted in nivolumab approval for second-line therapy of unresectable ESCC patients who have not been exposed to ICI. Here we provide a review of nivolumab and how this relates to ESCC management. Expert opinion Some ESCC patients will not experience a response to ICIs. Determining intrinsic and acquired resistance patterns are needed to further capitalize on ICI therapy for ESCC patients. PD-L1 expression has been explored as a potential biomarker. Data show, however, PD-L1 positive tumor patients benefit but this assessment is not always needed.

Real-world clinical outcomes of nivolumab and taxane as a second- or later-line therapy for recurrent or unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Nivolumab is approved in Japan as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) resistant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs. It is also used in adjuvant and primary postoperative therapies. This study aimed to report real-world data on nivolumab use for esophageal cancer treatment. In total, 171 patients with recurrent or unresectable advanced ESCC who received nivolumab (n = 61) or taxane (n = 110) were included. We collected real-world data of patients treated with nivolumab as a second- or later-line therapy and evaluated treatment outcomes and safety. Median overall survival was longer and progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer (p = 0.0172) in patients who received nivolumab than in patients who received taxane as a second- or later-line therapy. Furthermore, subgroup analysis for second-line treatment only showed the superiority of nivolumab in increasing the PFS rate (p = 0.0056). No serious adverse events were observed. In real-world practice, nivolumab was safer and more effective than taxane in patients with ESCC with diverse clinical profiles who did not meet trial eligibility criteria, including those with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, comorbidities, and receiving multiple treatments.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, Nivolumab, Combined with Chemotherapy Improved the Survival of Unresectable Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Experience.

Patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have a poor prognosis when treated with standard chemotherapy. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in esophageal cancer has been associated with poor survival and more advanced stage. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1 inhibitors, showed benefits in advanced esophageal cancer in clinical trials. We analyzed the prognosis of patients with unresectable esophageal SCC who received nivolumab with chemotherapy, dual immunotherapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab), or chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Patients who received nivolumab with chemotherapy had a better overall response rate (ORR) (72% vs. 66.67%, p = 0.038) and longer overall survival (OS) (median OS: 609 days vs. 392 days, p = 0.04) than those who received chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. In patients receiving nivolumab with chemotherapy, the duration of the treatment response was similar regardless of the treatment line they received. According to clinical parameters, liver and distant lymph nodes metastasis showed a trend of negative and positive impacts, respectively, on treatment response in the whole cohort and in the immunotherapy-containing regimen cohort. Nivolumab add-on treatment showed less gastrointestinal and hematological adverse effects, compare with chemotherapy. Here, we showed that nivolumab combined with chemotherapy is a better choice for patients with unresectable esophageal SCC.

Abstract 6187: The combination of Trifluridine/Tipiracil and a WEE1 inhibitor is an effective and tolerable candidate strategy against ESCC

Abstract Background: Recently we reported that trifluridine (FTD)/Tipiracil (TPI) is tolerable for unresectable Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients although the anti-tumor effect was modest (Mori Y, et al. Esophagus 2022). Therefore, we aimed at developing a combination therapy with FTD/TPI with another small molecule to achieve better efficacy against ESCC. CHK1 inhibitor was considered to be the candidate, because combination treatment with FTD/TPI and prexasertib showed potent antitumor effects in p53-mutant ESCC cells through the synthetic lethality (Ohashi S, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2020); however, CHK1 inhibitors are not clinically available for further clinical development. Here we explored the concept of synthetic lethality with CHK1 perturbation to the whole ATR-CHK1-WEE1 pathway, especially to the downward WEE1 which directly targets a cell cycle regulator CDK1. The aim of this study is to elucidate the efficacy of the combination of a WEE1 inhibitor (WEE1i) MK1775 with FTD/TPI in ESCC. Methods: ESCC cells (TE-8 and TE-11) are used for in vitro assay, with compounds including FTD, MK1775 (WEE1i). Mitosis assay (flowcytometry with phospho-Histone H3 [p-hH3] antibody), cell viability assay (WST-1 and clonogenic assays), cytotoxicity assay (CytoTox-Glo assay), and western blotting (double-strand DNA break [γ-H2AX], DDR activity [phospho-CHK1], and CDK1 activity [phospho-Tyr15-CDK1]) were performed. Antitumor effects and tolerability were observed in vivo with TE-8 xenograft model with nu/nu nude mice. Results: FTD induced activation of CHK1 and inhibition of CDK1 sequentially in ESCC cells. FTD also decreased the proportion of p-hH3 positive cells in mitosis assay. Combination treatment with WEE1i and FTD had activated CDK1, increased p-hH3 positive cells, and induced γ-H2AX. The WST-1 cell viability assay showed significant sensitizing effect of WEE1i to FTD in ESCC cells. The cytotoxicity assay also revealed the significant increase of dead cells by the combination treatment (p = 0.003). Furthermore, we confirmed the combination treatment significantly suppressed xenografted tumor growth (-86%) without major adverse events in vivo (two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc analyses: FTD/TPI vs. control, P &amp;lt; 0.05; MK1775 vs. control, P &amp;lt; 0.05, without significant interaction between the FTD/TPI treatment and MK1775 treatment). Conclusion: FTD/TPI and WEE1i combination showed potent cytotoxicity, and is considered as a candidate treatment strategy against ESCC. Citation Format: Hoang Trang Nguyen Vu, Osamu Kikuchi, Tomoki Saito, Yukie Nakai, Tomomi Ida, Yuki Kondo, Shigeki Kataoka, Yosuke Mitani, Shinya Ohashi, Manabu Muto. The combination of Trifluridine/Tipiracil and a WEE1 inhibitor is an effective and tolerable candidate strategy against ESCC. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6187.