Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Stem Cell Research Articles

High CD34-positive cell dose in matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is not associated with graft-versus-host disease or mortality.

CD34+ stem cells serve as the primary graft source for allogeneic transplants, with a minimum of 2-4 × 106 cells/kg needed for engraftment. There are conflicting data on outcomes at high stem cell doses, with studies limited by few patients receiving doses far above the minimum target. In this retrospective, single-center study of patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent matched unrelated donor transplants, we assessed outcomes for engraftment, survival, relapse, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) for the highest CD34+ dose quintile (>13 × 106 cells/kg, n = 36) compared to the remaining patients (n = 139). Similar analysis was performed correlating T cell dose and outcomes. There was no difference between the groups in neutrophil engraftment, with a trend toward faster platelet engraftment. There was no significant difference in mortality (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-1.22), relapse (aRR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42), or overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = .44). High CD34+ dose was not associated with higher incidence of acute GVHD (aRR = 0.99 grades II-IV, aRR = 1.18 grades III-IV) or chronic GVHD (aRR = 0.87 overall, RR = 1.21 severe). There was limited correlation between CD34+ and T cell dose (R2 = .073), and there was no significant difference in survival, relapse, or GVHD in the highest T cell dose quintile (n = 33) compared to the remaining quintiles (n = 132). We found no difference in survival, relapse, or GVHD incidence or severity in patients receiving CD34+ doses above prior cutoffs reported in the literature. These data do not support the routine use of graft CD34+ dose reduction.

Clinical outcomes of patients receiving three versus four doses of methotrexate with concomitant antithymocyte globulin in match unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplant: A single-center experience.

Methotrexate (MTX) doses on days +1, +3, +6, and +11 after match unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplant (MUD HSCT) is a common graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen. However, the overlapping toxicity of MTX with conditioning chemotherapy sometimes warrants the omission of the fourth dose of MTX. Prior single-institution studies showed conflicting results comparing the outcomes of patients who received three versus four doses of MTX, but to our knowledge, the effect of concomitant antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has not been reported. Charts of patients who underwent MUD HSCT between 2009 and 2023 were reviewed. Patients received rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin), given at 0.5mg/kg on day -3, 2mg/kg on day -2, and 2.5mg/kg on day -1. MTX is given at 15mg/m2 on day +1 and 10mg/m2 on days +3, +6, and +11. Severe mucositis was the most common indication for day +11 MTX omission (82%). We identified 292 patients (116 in 3 dose cohort and 176 in 4 dose cohort). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 1-151). Patients in the 4 doses cohort were more frequently male (68% vs. 50%, p<0.01), received a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (38.0% vs. 22%, p<0.01), were older (median 58 vs. 54 years, p=0.02), and received a transplant in the earlier era (median HSCT year 2014 vs. 2018, p<0.01). A statistically significant difference was not evidenced between the cohorts for the following outcomes: acute GVHD (aGVHD) (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.5), chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-1.6), relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.5), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2), and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.7). Both cohorts had similar median time to neutrophil engraftment at 14 days. When ATG is incorporated, omission of day +11 MTX does not significantly impact the rate of engraftment or cumulative incidence of aGVHD, cGVHD, RFS, NRM, and OS.

Haploidentical and matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offer similar survival outcomes for acute leukemia.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) has emerged as an effective approach for acute leukemia, primarily due to the inherent difficulty in finding human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated donors (MUD). Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether haplo-HSCT and MUD-HSCT can provide comparable outcomes in patients with acute leukemia. This study aimed to assess the overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) outcomes between the MUD-HSCT and haplo-HSCT groups. This retrospective analysis encompassed adult patients with acute leukemia undergoing the initial allo-HSCT. Among these 85 patients, we stratified 33 patients into the MUD-HSCT group and 52 to the haplo-HSCT group. The primary outcomes were OS and LFS. The median OS was not reached in the haplo-HSCT group, while it reached 29.8 months in patients undergoing MUD-HSCT (p = .211). Likewise, the median LFS periods were 52.6 months in the haplo-HSCT group and 12.7 months in the MUD-HSCT group (p = .212). Importantly, neither the OS nor LFS showed substantial differences between the MUD-HSCT and haplo-HSCT groups. Furthermore, univariate analyses revealed that haplo-HSCT did not demonstrate a significantly higher risk of worse LFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.25; p = .216) or OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-1.26; p = .214) than MUD-HSCT. Notably, a high European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation risk score (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.87; p = .007) and non-complete remission (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.17-5.23; p = .017) were significantly correlated with worse OS. Haplo-HSCT may serve as an alternative to MUD-HSCT for the treatment of acute leukemia, offering similar survival outcomes.

Outcomes of Attenuated Dose Fludarabine and Melphalan Based Conditioning Regimen in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Acute Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Introduction: Fludarabine combined with melphalan 140 mg/m2 (FluMel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen in patients undergoing matched related (MRD) and unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Ciurea et al Blood 2020, described outcomes of Flu 160 mg/m2 and Mel 100 mg/m2. In this study, we describe our experience of attenuated melphalan dosing 100-120 mg/m2 versus 140 mg/m2 with fludarabine 125 mg/m2 (attenuated FluMel versus regular dose FluMel). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients from November 2016 to April 2023 with AML, ALL or MDS undergoing alloSCT who received fludarabine and melphalan. Patients who received the lower dose of melphalan were considered to be the attenuated FluMel cohort, whereas patients receiving the melphalan 140 mg/m2 were considered to be the control cohort. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to estimate OS. NRM and relapse incidence (RI) was calculated using competing risk analysis. R 4.2.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) was used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of 134 patients [92 (68.7%) males] were evaluated. Thirty-seven (27.6%) patients received attenuated FluMel and 97 (72.4%) patients received regular dose FluMel (controls). Among the patients in the attenuated FluMel cohort, 5 (13.5%) patients also received fludarabine at doses less than 125 mg/m 2 [median 20 mg/m 2 (range 87.5-112.5 mg/m 2]. Median age at transplant was 65 years (range 30 - 76 years). The most common disease was AML [75 (56.0%) patients] ( Table 1). Patients in the attenuated FluMel group had comparable iothalamate clearance compared to control cohort (clearance &amp;lt;65 ml/min/1.73 m2: 18.9% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.52). Patients in the attenuated FluMel group had comparable rates of high/very high DRI to those in control cohort (51.4% vs. 43.3%, P = 0.91). Compared to the control cohort, patients in the attenuated FluMel group were less likely to have a matched related donor (21.6% vs. 45.4%, P = 0.02) and were more likely to receive PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis (37.8% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.02). Among the patients receiving attenuated FluMel, the median melphalan dose administered was 100 mg/m2. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 19 days (IQR 16-21 days), and median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range 12-25 days). Eleven (29.7%) patients developed post-alloSCT mucositis, and 3 (8.1%) patients developed grade 3-4 mucositis. All the patients in the attenuated FluMel group achieved 100% CD33 donor chimerism at day +30 (n=35) and day +100 (n=28) after alloSCT. Similarly, 26 (74.3%, n = 35) patients achieved ≥ 95% CD3 donor chimerism at day +30 after alloSCT and 23 (82.1%, n = 28) patients achieved ≥ 95% CD3 donor chimerism at day +100 after alloSCT. Median follow-up of the entire cohort after alloSCT was 2.3 years (95% CI 2.1-2.5 years). Median follow-up was 1.5 years in the attenuated FluMel cohort and 2.5 years for the control cohort ( P&amp;lt;0.001) . Survival was similar among patients receiving attenuated FluMel vs. control cohort (2-year OS 74.7% vs. 65.0%, P = 0.28). At 2 years post-alloSCT, the attenuated FluMel and control cohort had similar non-relapse mortality (19.9% vs. 24.4%, P=0.58) and relapse (22% vs. 15.2%, P=0.51). The attenuated FluMel was not associated with an increased incidence of relapse (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.50-3.73, P=0.55) or NRM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.28-1.95, P = 0.55). GVHD-free relapse free (GRFS) survival was also similar among the attenuated Flu/Mel and control cohort (1-year GRFS rate 41.1% vs. 45.6%, P = 0.8). Among the patients receiving PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis, the 2-year OS in patients receiving attenuated FluMel was higher than the control group, but it was not statistically significant (2-year OS rate: 90% vs. 55%, P=0.37, Figure 1). Compared to the control group, the attenuated FluMel group had similar rates of NRM at 100 days (10% vs. 12.5%), 1 year (NA vs. 25%) and at 2 years after alloSCT (NA vs. 25%, P=0.54). GRFS at 1 year was also similar between the attenuated FluMel and control group (68.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.69). Conclusion: The attenuated dosed FluMel conditioning is a safe and effective regimen for elderly patients with acute leukemia and MDS, and is non-inferior to regular dose FluMel. Among patients receiving PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis, the lower dose of melphalan was non-inferior to regular dose FluMel for survival outcomes. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

A phase 2 trial of CD24Fc for prevention of graft-versus-host disease

AbstractPatients who undergo human leukocyte antigen–matched unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with myeloablative conditioning for hematologic malignancies often develop acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) despite standard calcineurin inhibitor–based prophylaxis in combination with methotrexate. This trial evaluated a novel human CD24 fusion protein (CD24Fc/MK-7110) that selectively targets and mitigates inflammation due to damage-associated molecular patterns underlying acute GVHD while preserving protective immunity after myeloablative conditioning. This phase 2a, multicenter study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CD24Fc in combination with tacrolimus and methotrexate in preventing acute GVHD in adults undergoing MUD HSCT for hematologic malignancies. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase to identify a recommended dose was followed by an open-label expansion phase with matched controls to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD24Fc in preventing acute GVHD. A multidose regimen of CD24Fc produced sustained drug exposure with similar safety outcomes when compared with single-dose regimens. Grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD–free survival at day 180 was 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.7-99.4) in the CD24Fc expansion cohort (CD24Fc multidose), compared with 73.6% (95% CI, 63.2-81.4) in matched controls (hazard ratio, 0.1 [95% CI, 0.0-0.6]; log-rank test, P = .03). No participants in the CD24Fc escalation or expansion phases experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The multidose regimen of CD24Fc was well tolerated with no DLTs and was associated with high rates of severe acute GVHD–free survival after myeloablative MUD HSCT. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02663622.

Overcoming difficulties in donor selection for pediatric allogeneic transplantation in a resource- limited country

Objective: Centers in resource-limited countries face significant challenges in performing unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We analyze the outcome of concrete actions taken by our program since 2008 to gain access to worldwide transplant donors, select and procure the preferred donor for our patients, and perform the transplant timely. &#x0D; Methods: We focused on three aspects to gain unlimited access to unrelated donors: hiring and training dedicated nurse coordinators, establishing fluid communication and collaboration with donor registries and cord blood banks, and careful planning of the transplant procedure to avoid delays. We describe the evolution of donor choice since 2008 and the time to transplantation between related (matched sibling and haploidentical) and unrelated (adult and cord blood) donors. &#x0D; Results: We transplanted 238 children between 2008 and 2022. Transplant activity increased from 28 procedures in 2008-2010 to 85 in 2020-2022, mainly at the expense of unrelated donors. The proportion of unrelated donors between both periods increased from 14% to 65% as cord blood usage decreased from 65% to 9% (p&lt;0,001). DKMS donor centers provided 60% of the products. The mean time to transplantation was 68 days for related donors (MSD and haploidentical) and 74 days for unrelated donors (MUD, MMUD, UCB). &#x0D; Conclusion: Despite practicing in a limited resource setting, specific actions allowed us to overcome difficulties in search, procurement, and timely transplantation.

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Donor Collections and Safety.

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly influenced unrelated donor (UD) allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections. Changes included efforts to minimize COVID-19 exposure to donors and cryopreservation of products. The extent to which the efficacy and safety of PBSC donations were affected by the pandemic is unknown. Prospective cohort analysis of PBSC collections comparing pre-pandemic (01 April 2019-14 March 2020) and pandemic (15 March 2020-31 March 2022) eras. Of a total of 291 PBSC collections, cryopreservation was undertaken in 71.4% of pandemic donations compared to 1.1% pre-pandemic. The mean requested CD34+ cell dose/kg increased from 4.9 ± 0.2 × 106 pre-pandemic to 5.4 ± 0.1 × 106 during the pandemic. Despite this increased demand, the proportion of collections that met or exceeded the requested cell dose did not change, and the mean CD34+ cell doses collected (8.9 ± 0.5 × 106 pre-pandemic vs. 9.7 ± 0.4 × 106 during the pandemic) remained above requested targets. Central-line placements were more frequent, and severe adverse events in donors increased during the pandemic. Cryopreservation of UD PBSC products increased during the pandemic. In association with this, requested cell doses for PBSC collections increased. Collection targets were met or exceeded at the same frequency, signaling high donor and collection center commitment. This was at the expense of increased donor or product-related severe adverse events. We highlight the need for heightened vigilance about donor safety as demands on donors have increased since the pandemic.

Low dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants in children

Low dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants in children

Outcomes of Matched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants with High CD34-Positive Cell Dose: A Single Center Experience

Introduction: CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells serve as the primary source for the majority of allogeneic stem cell transplants for hematologic malignancy, and adequate cell numbers must be infused to ensure engraftment. While the target dose is typically 5x106 cells/kg, there have been conflicting data on the effect of higher doses on outcomes. Due to concern for adverse effects, such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), some groups have suggested capping the CD34+ cell dose; however, various levels have been recommended, and the majority of studies have only small numbers of patients at very high cell doses where any effects may be most evident. In addition, manipulation of grafts can be time-consuming and lead to an increased risk of contamination. To better assess the effect of high cell dose on outcomes, we reviewed patients at our center who received matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants with CD34+ dose in the highest quintile. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients with hematologic malignancy who received a MUD allogeneic stem cell transplant with CD34+ cell dose in the highest quintile (>13x106 cells/kg) from 2005 to 2021. Data were collected on patient and donor demographics, disease and transplant characteristics, and CIBMTR risk index. Outcomes were compared with the remaining MUD transplant patients during the same time period, including overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), GVHD rates and severity, and engraftment kinetics, with survival data censored at 10 years. Patients who received multiple transplants or had cryopreserved grafts were excluded. Neutrophil (PMN) engraftment was defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with absolute neutrophil count >500 cells/µL, and platelet (PLT) engraftment defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with PLT count >20x103 cells/µL and at least 7 days after most recent transfusion. Demographic data and GVHD rates were compared by Fisher's exact test or chi-squared test; age by Welch's t-test; engraftment kinetics medians by Mann-Whitney U test; and OS, RFS, and TRM by Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test for significance. Results: 36 patients were identified in the highest quintile with a median CD34+ dose of 16.83x106 cells/kg (range: 13.02-39.02) compared to 139 control patients with median dose of 7.74x106 cells/kg (2.72-12.99). Patients in the high-dose group were more likely to be female (58.3% vs 38.8%, p=.04), with no other statistically significant differences in donor, recipient, or disease characteristics (Table 1). There was a trend toward faster PLT engraftment in the CD34-high group (median 16 vs 16.5 days, p=.058), but there was no effect on PMN engraftment time (14 vs 14, p=.78). There was no difference in incidence of acute GVHD, either grade 2 or above (33.3% vs 36.0%, p=.85) or grade 3 or above (19.4% vs 15.8%, p=.62), and the groups showed similar incidence of chronic GVHD both overall (38.9% vs 48.2%, p=.35) and for severe disease (13.9% vs 11.5%, p=.77). There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure 1, p=.44). Comparing the CD34-high group to the control group, the estimated 2-year survival was 47.2% vs 55.7%, and the estimated 5-year survival was 37.3% vs 45.2%. There was similarly no difference in RFS or TRM (p=.34 and p=.55, data not shown). Conclusions: Previous studies of the effect of CD34+ cell dose on transplant outcomes have been limited by small numbers of patients at the highest doses. In this single-center study using one of the highest dose cutoffs in the literature (>13x106 cells/kg), we showed a trend toward faster PLT engraftment with no difference in GVHD incidence or mortality. As a retrospective study, a major limitation is possible confounding, and we plan to include other potential factors, such as GVHD prophylaxis, in multivariate analysis, though our initial results did not show major differences in baseline characteristics. In this cohort, patients receiving very high CD34+ cell doses had similar outcomes to those receiving standard doses. These data do not support the routine use of graft reduction by CD34+ cell number, which may help guide future practice. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

A Tale of Two Rashes in a Bone Marrow Transplant Patient

A 68-year-old female patient with myelofibrosis was admitted for scheduled matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Her past medical history was also significant for Grover disease, also known as transient acantholytic dermatosis, characterized by chronic pruritic skin eruptions. On admission, the patient had no complaints with stable vital signs and benign physical examination. Laboratory values were notable for anemia with hemoglobin of 8.33g/dL, white blood cell count of 7.22 k/uL, and platelet count of 297 k/uL.

Should anti-thymocyte globulin be added in post-transplant cyclophosphamide based matched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia? A study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.

In this registry-based study which includes acute myeloid leukemia patients who underwent a matched unrelated donor allogeneic peripheral-blood stem cell transplantation in complete remission and received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, we compared 421 recipients without anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) with 151 patients with ATG. The only significant differences between PTCY and PTCY + ATG cohorts were the median year of transplant and the follow-up period (2017 vs 2015 and 19.6 vs 31.1 months, respectively, p < 0.0001). Overall, 2-year survival was 69.9% vs 67.1% in PTCY and PTCY + ATG, respectively, with deaths related to relapse (39% vs 43.5%), infection (21.9% vs 23.9%) or GvHD (17.1% vs 17.4%) not differing between groups. On univariate comparison, a significantly lower rate of extensive chronic GvHD was found when ATG was added (9.9% vs 21%, p = 0.029), a finding which was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. The Cox-model showed no difference between PTCY + ATG and PTCY alone with respect to acute and chronic GvHD of all grades, non-relapse mortality, relapse, leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GvHD-free-relapse-free survival between study cohorts. Our results highlight that the addition of ATG in PTCY does not provide any extra benefit in terms of further GvHD reduction, better GRFS or better survival.

Donor Socioeconomic Status As a Predictor of Altered Immune Function and Treatment Response Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancy

Introduction: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) carries significant risks for mortality, which are not proportionally shared across individuals. Among HCT recipients, we have previously shown that low socioeconomic status (SES) is predictive of increased mortality following HCT, and the underlying mechanism for this outcome is not fully explained by race, insurance status or access to care. Furthermore, following HCT, the donor immune system replaces that of the recipient, leading to long-term engraftment with donor-derived immune cells. Previous work has not addressed the influence of donor socioeconomic factors on HCT recipient outcomes. Therefore, we hypothesized that SES would impact donor hematopoietic cells and this effect would be transferrable and associated with adverse recipient outcomes.Methods: Recipients of matched unrelated donor allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell HCT between 2000-2013 for hematologic malignancy, resided in the United States (US) with a documented ZIP code, and had a HCT donor with documented US ZIP code were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR). Using donor ZIP code, SES measures of household income, poverty, education, housing and employment were derived from the U.S. Census American Community Survey. A standardized donor SES composite score was computed as an equally weighted average of the 5 standardized SES variables (mean composite score = 0, standard deviation (SD) = 1). Multivariable models, adjusted for donor and recipient characteristics, were used to evaluate associations between donor SES composite score with HCT recipient disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), treatment related mortality (TRM), relapse, and acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). Results were considered significant if P < 0.01.Results: Among 2,005 HCT recipients, median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range 1-77), 44% were female, and 55% had acute myeloid leukemia. Median post-HCT follow up was 120 months (range 4-219). Donors were 44% female and median age at hematopoietic cell donation was 34.7 years (range 18-62). The standardized donor composite scores ranged from -2.6 to 3.9, with a higher composite score indicative of greater socioeconomic disadvantage. Multivariable analyses identified significant associations between the standardized donor SES composite score and DFS (HR 1.07 per SD SES, 95% CI 1.02-1.13; p=0.0088), OS (HR 1.09 per SD SES, 95% CI 1.04-1.15; p=0.0007), and TRM (HR 1.10 per SD SES, 95% CI 1.03-1.17; p=0.0049). Significant associations were not identified between donor SES and relapse or GVHD. Quantitatively, recipients transplanted with cells from a donor of greater socioeconomic disadvantage (i.e. SES composite score 2 SD above the mean) experienced a 10% reduction in DFS and OS, and a 5% increase in TRM at 3 years compared with those transplanted with cells from a high-SES donor (SES composite score 2 SD below the mean) (Figure).Conclusions: For the first time, we have demonstrated that socioeconomic disadvantage among HCT donors results in adverse transplant outcomes in the HCT recipient. This novel finding suggests that SES has biologic impacts down to the stem cell level that persist even when transplanted into a new host during HCT. The implications of these findings are broad and suggest the need for public health interventions targeting socioeconomic support as a means for preventing social disparities in cancer treatment outcomes. [Display omitted] DisclosuresVerneris: Novartis: Other: advisory board; jazz: Other: advisory board; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Outcomes with Mismatched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the optimal and potentially curative therapy in various high-risk hematologic malignancies. Although a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor is a clinically preferred stem cell source, the use of haploidentical family donors and umbilical cord blood HCT now offers the option of HCT in patients lacking a matched donor. However, many patients lack an appropriate donor, in particular the ethnic minorities. Mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) have historically been utilized as alternative donor source for these patients due to ease of donor availability but is associated with increased risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the outcomes with MMUD HCT.Methods:Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) from date of inception through February 2021 using the MeSH and entry terms for “hematopoietic stem cell transplantation”, OR “hematologic neoplasms”, AND unrelated donors“ AND ”treatment outcome“. A total of 2477 records were identified and primary and secondary screening was done. After excluding review, duplicate, and non-relevant articles, we included 13 studies (11 retrospective, 2 prospective) reporting outcomes following MMUD HCT. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data and randomized control trial was used for quality assessment, and all studies were reported as good. Proportions along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted to compute pooled analysis using the ‘meta’ package by Schwarzer et al. in the R programming language (version 4.16-2). The variance between the studies was calculated using Der Simonian-Laird Estimator.Results:We identified 2588 patients from 13 included studies who had MMUD HCT. (Table 1) Median age was 51.7 (18-76) years and 52% (n=1347) were males. Source of primary graft was bone marrow (BM) in 19% (n=478/2508) and peripheral blood (PB) in 81% (n=2030/2508) HCT recipients. Median time to transplant was 10.45 (1.5-139.6) months and median follow up was 41.5 (0.4-136.5) months. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) conditioning was used for 73% (n=1884) of the patients while 27.2% (n= 704) patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC). We estimated a pooled overall survival (OS) of 59% (95% CI 0.52-0.66, I 2 = 92%, n=2563) at one year and 44% (0.36-0.53, I 2=92%, n=1972) at three years. The pooled incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV), acute GVHD (grade III-IV), and chronic GVHD were 39% (95% CI 0.33-0.44, I 2=84%, n=2282), 19% (95% CI 0.15-0.23, I 2=65%, n=1417), and 38% (95% CI 0.32-0.47, I 2=93%, n=2477) respectively. Progression free survival (PFS) was 39.5% (95% CI 0.31-0.48, I 2=94% n=2505). The pooled incidence of relapse rate (RR) and NRM were 31% (95% CI 0.25-0.38, I 2=90%, n=2482) and 27% (95% CI 0.21-0.34, I 2 =90% n=2448) respectively.Conclusion:Mismatched unrelated donor HCT has shown favorable outcomes with acceptable toxicity profile. MMUD HCT represents a promising option for patients lacking an HLA-matched donor and has expanded access to HCT in patients with ethnic minorities who often lack a matched donor. [Display omitted] DisclosuresAbhyankar: Incyte/Therakos: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. McGuirk: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Outcomes with Mismatched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Reduced Intensity Conditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) is often the optimal and only potentially curative therapy in several high-risk hematologic malignancies. Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors remain the preferred choice for HSCT recipients, haploidentical and umbilical cord blood HSCT has increased access to transplantation. Despite these advances, many patients lack an appropriate donor, in particular the ethnic minorities. The use of mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) has increased over the years but concerns regarding increased risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) limits the utility of MMUD HSCT. The intensity of the conditioning regimen has a significant impact on survival in case of mismatched donors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the outcomes with MMUD HSCT using reduced intensity conditioning (RIC).Methods:Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) from date of inception through February 2021 using the MeSH and entry terms for “hematopoietic stem cell transplantation”, OR “hematologic neoplasms”, AND unrelated donors“ AND ”treatment outcome“. A total of 2477 records were identified and primary and secondary screening was done. After excluding review, duplicate, and non-relevant articles, we included 6 (4 retrospective, 2 prospective) studies reporting outcomes following RIC MMUD HSCT. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data and randomized control trial was used for quality assessment, and all studies were reported as good. Proportions along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted to compute pooled analysis using the ‘meta’ package by Schwarzer et al. in the R programming language (version 4.16-2). The variance between the studies was calculated using Der Simonian Laird Estimator.Results:We identified 895 participants in the 6 studies, who had MMUD HSCT with RIC. (Table 1) Median age was 57.5 (18-76) years and 56% (n= 415) were males as reported by four studies (n=740). In five studies with available data (n=855), source of the primary graft was peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) in 72% (n=614) and 28% (n=241) of the HSCT recipients respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 (3-125) months, we estimated a pooled overall survival (OS) of 62% (95% CI 0.52-0.72, I 2=84%, n=895) at one year and 43.5% (95% CI 0.33-0.54, I 2 =84% n=855) at three years. The pooled incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV), acute GVHD (grade III-IV), and chronic GVHD were 37% (95% CI 0.26-0.49, I 2=81%, n=610), 16% (95% CI 0.07-0.29, I 2=87%, n=542), and 28% (95% CI 0.13-0.47, I 2=95%, n=848) respectively. Progression free survival (PFS) and relapse rates (RR) were 46% (95% CI 0.30-0.62, I 2=92%, n=814) and 31% (95% CI 0.24-0.39, I 2=65%, n=814) respectively. The pooled incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 23% (95% CI 0.09-0.40, I 2=91%, n=707). Kasamon et al. and Shaw et al. reported 1-year OS of 75-79% with MMUD HSCT using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and 2 Gy total body irradiation RIC, bone marrow graft and post-transplant cyclophosphamide, sirolimus and mycophenolate for GVHD prophylaxis.Conclusion:Mismatched unrelated donor HSCT has shown favorable outcomes with reduced intensity conditioning using a post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen, comparable to the historical outcomes with mismatched related donor (haploidentical) HSCT. MMUD HSCT with RIC can be considered in patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. This strategy will expand access to HSCT in patients with ethnic minorities who often lack a matched donor. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMcGuirk: EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Clinical impact of multiple DNA virus infections in nondepleted haploidentical and unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Few studies have compared the clinical impact of multiple DNA-virus infections in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (UD-HSCT) with thymoglobulin, so we retrospectively analyzed viral infections in the first 6mo posttransplant in these scenarios. Fifty-nine patients underwent to haplo-HSCT, and 68 to UD-HSCT. The most frequent infection was cytomegalovirus (CMV) (76.3% in haplo-HSCT and 69.1% in UD-HSCT) (P=.878) and in the group of patients with CMV reactivation, maximal CMV viral load over 2500UI/ml correlated with worse overall survival-hazard ratio (HR) 1.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-3.59) P=.03. The cumulative incidence of multiple DNA virus within 180d of posttransplant was 78.7% for one virus and 28.4% for two or more viruses with no difference regarding the type of transplant. Viral infections, age, and acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV were risk factors for worse overall survival in multivariate analyses: one virus HR 2.53 (95% CI 1.03-6.17) P=.04, two or more viruses HR 3.51 (95% CI 1.37-9) P<.01, age HR 1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.05) P<.01 and acute GVHD II-IV HR 1.97 (95% CI 1.13-3.43) P=.01. Also, age over 50y HR 4.25 (95% CI 2.01-8.97) P<.001, second CMV reactivation or having both CMV and BK polyomavirus (BKV) HR 2.65 (95% CI 1.26-5.56) P=.01 and acute GVHD grades II-IV HR 2.23 (95% CI 1.12-4.43) P=.022 were risk factors for nonrelapse mortality in the multivariate analyses. In conclusion, multiple DNA-virus infections are frequent in both haplo-HSCT and UD-HSCT and a risk factor for worse overall survival.

High-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Matched and Mismatched Unrelated Donor Transplantation

The optimal prophylaxis regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the setting of single-locus mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is unclear. The use of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) after haploidentical transplantation is effective at overcoming the negative impact of HLA disparity on survival. Limited information is available regarding the efficacy of this strategy in alloHSCT from MMUDs. Most of the published studies have used the triple immunosuppressant model of haploidentical transplant combining PTCy with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate. In our study, we propose the use of a simpler GVHD prophylaxis protocol comprising PTCy in combination with tacrolimus for MMUD and matched unrelated donor (MUD) alloHSCT. We performed a retrospective analysis of 109 consecutive recipients of alloHSCT from unrelated donors (MMUD, n=55; MUD, n=54) in a single center. Graft source was primarily peripheral blood (98%). No differences were observed between the MMUD and MUD groups with respect to 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD; 31% versus 32%, respectively, P=.9), grade III to IV aGVHD (9% versus 7%, P=.7), and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 2 years (18% versus 14%, P=.6). Both groups showed similar cumulative incidence of 1 year nonrelapse mortality (13% versus 9%; P=.5) and 3-year relapse rates (24% versus 25%, P=.7). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 3 years for MMUD and MUD were 56% and 57% (P=.9) and 64% and 65% (P=.6), respectively. The 3-year probability of survival free of moderate/severe cGVHD and relapse was 56% and 55%, respectively. GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy and tacrolimus achieves low rates of severe aGVHD and cGVHD, as well as good survival outcomes, in recipients of both MMUD and MUD peripheral blood alloHSCT. This strategy overcomes the negative impact of single-locus HLA disparity.

G-CSF-Primed Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Haploidentical Transplantation Could Achieve Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes for Acute Leukemia Patients in the First Complete Remission: A Registered Study.

G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (G-PB) harvest is the predominant graft for identical sibling donor and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, but it was controversial in haploidentical related donor (HID) HSCT. In this registry study, we aimed to identify the efficacy of HID G-PB HSCT (HID-PBSCT) for acute leukemia (AL) patients in first complete remission (CR1). Also, we reported the outcomes for the use of G-PB grafts in comparison with the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts in HID HSCT recipients. Sixty-seven AL patients in CR1 who received HID-PBSCT were recruited at Institute of Hematology, Peking University. Patients who received haploidentical HSCT using the combination of G-BM and G-PB harvests in the same period were enrolled as controls (n=392). The median time from HSCT to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days (range, 9–19 days) and 12 days (range, 8–171 days), respectively. The 28-day cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment after HSCT was 98.5% and 95.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade II–IV and grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 29.9% (95%CI 18.8–40.9%) and 7.5% (95%CI 1.1–13.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of total and moderate-severe chronic GVHD were 54.9% (95%CI 40.9–68.8%) and 17.4% (95%CI 6.7–28.0%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 13.9% (95%CI 5.4–22.5%) and 3.4% (95%CI 0–8.1%), respectively. The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 84.7% (95%CI 74.7–94.7%) and 82.7% (95%CI 73.3–92.1%) respectively. Compared with the HID HSCT recipients using the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts, the engraftments of neutrophil and platelet were both significantly faster for the G-PB group, and the other clinical outcomes were all comparable between the groups. In multivariate analysis, graft types did not influence the clinical outcomes. Overall, for the patients with AL CR1, G-PB graft could be considered an acceptable graft for HID HSCT recipients. This study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03756675.

A phase 3 double-blind study of the addition of tocilizumab vs placebo to cyclosporin/methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis

We determined the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in preventing grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplasia undergoing matched sibling donor (MSD) or volunteer unrelated donor (VUD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning across 5 Australian centers. A total of 145 patients (50 MSD, 95 VUD) were randomly assigned to placebo or TCZ on day −1. All patients received T-cell–replete peripheral blood stem cell grafts and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporin/methotrexate. A planned substudy analyzed the VUD cohort. With a median follow-up of 746 days, the incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD at day 100 for the entire cohort was 36% for placebo vs 27% for TCZ (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.26; P = .23) and 45% vs 32% (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-1.22; P = .16) for the VUD subgroup. The incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD at day 180 for the entire cohort was 40% for placebo vs 29% for TCZ (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.38-1.22; P = .19) and 48% vs 32% (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.30-1.16; P = .13) for the VUD subgroup. Reductions in aGVHD were predominantly in grade 2 disease. For the entire cohort, transplant-related mortality occurred in 8% vs 11% of placebo-treated vs TCZ-treated patients, respectively (P = .56), and overall survival was 79% vs 71% (P = .27). Median day to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was delayed by 2 to 3 days in TCZ-treated patients, whereas liver toxicity and infectious complications were similar between groups. In this phase 3 randomized double-blind trial, TCZ showed nonsignificant trends toward reduced incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD in recipients from HLA-matched VUDs but no improvements in long term-survival.

Association between preconditioning absolute lymphocyte count and transplant outcomes in patients undergoing matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning and anti-thymocyte globulin.

Background:Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) offers cure chance for various hematologic malignancies, but graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major impediment. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is used for prophylactic T-cell depletion and GVHD prevention, but there are no clear guidelines for the optimal dosing of ATG. It is suspected that for patients with low absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), current weight-based dosing of ATG can be excessive, which can result in profound T-cell depletion and poor transplant outcome.Methods:The objective of the study is to evaluate the association of low preconditioning ALC with outcomes in patients undergoing matched unrelated donor (MUD) alloSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and ATG. We conducted a single-center retrospective longitudinal cohort study of acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients over 18 years old undergoing alloSCT. In total, 64 patients were included and dichotomized into lower ALC and higher ALC groups with the cutoff of 500/μl on D-7.Results:Patients with preconditioning ALC <500/μl were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and higher infectious mortality. The incidence of acute GVHD and moderate-severe chronic GVHD as well as relapse rates did not differ according to preconditioning ALC. In multivariate analyses, low preconditioning ALC was recognized as an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS.Conclusion:Patients with lower ALC are exposed to excessive dose of ATG, leading to profound T-cell depletion that results in higher infectious mortality and shorter OS. Our results call for the implementation of more creative dosing regimens for patients with low preconditioning ALC.

Three distinct hematological malignancies from a single germ cell tumor: a case report

BackgroundThe association between non seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCTs) and hematological malignancies of rare lineage has been described in the literature. In some of these cases there is evidence that the leukemia derives from a pluripotent primitive clone present in the original germ cell tumor.Case presentationWe present a highly unusual case of a 23-year-old man of South Asian origin with a history of Klinefelter’s syndrome who initially developed mediastinal non seminomatous GCT. Following treatment with surgery and standard chemotherapy he went on to develop three different hematological malignancies of distinct lineages in sequential fashion over a short time period. Despite treatment with multiple intensive chemotherapy regimens and a matched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplant, he died 41 months after initial diagnosis of his GCT and 10 months after the first diagnosis of hematological malignancy.ConclusionsThis is an extreme case that highlights the pluripotency and aggressiveness of these GCT-derived hematological malignancies, and the need for novel therapeutic approaches.