Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Research Articles

The feasibility of double stent strategy in left main true bifurcation with small and large angle change between diastole and systole: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) registry.

Provisional single stenting strategy (PSS) is a default strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD). Previous study reported that a bifurcation angle change (BAC) between end diastole and systole was associated with outcomes after PCI with double stent strategy (DSS) for ULMD. However, there are no data comparing outcomes after PCI with PSS versus DSS according the degree of BAC. We evaluated outcomes after PCI with PSS versus DSS for true ULMD with small and large BAC. We identified 566 patients with true ULMD underwent PCI in three high-volume centers. We calculated the BAC in ULMD between end-diastole and systole before stenting with 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment. We defined small (BAC < 7.0°) and large BAC (≥7.0°) group. We compared clinical outcomes after PCI with PSS versus DSS in each cohort after propensity score adjustment. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure (TLF), which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction. In small BAC cohort, TLF rate was significantly lower in DSS group than in PSS group (12.5% vs. 20.1%, adjusted HR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79; p = 0.006). In contrast, in large BAC cohort, TLF rate was significantly higher in DSS group than in PSS group (54.9% vs. 29.0%, adjusted HR 2.25; 95% CI, 1.50-3.38; p < 0.001). The TLF rate after PCI with DSS was significantly lower in true ULMD with small BAC compared to PSS even after propensity score adjustment. In contrast, it was significantly higher in those with large BAC.

Double Kissing Mini-Culotte Stenting in Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Under Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance: Immediate and Short-Term Outcomes

IntroductionCulotte stenting is an effective strategy for left main coronary bifurcation lesions. Increased side branch ostial restenosis is the main drawback of Culotte stenting. This is due to a napkin ring or potential gap produced at the ostium of the side branch. A bench study by Toth et al. has shown that additional sequential kissing balloon dilation before main vessel stenting can prevent this deformity. AimWe report immediate and short-term results of Double Kissing (DK) mini-Culotte stenting with a one-year angiographic follow-up. MethodsForty-five patients of distal left main (LM) disease underwent DK mini-Culotte stenting at our center between March 2020 and December 2022 under Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) guidance. ResultsOut of 45 patients [male:35(77.77%); mean age:63.67±4.94years], chronic coronary syndrome was present in 26(57.8%) and unstable angina in rest. All lesions were Medina (1,1,1), (0,1,1), or (1,0,1) with a median Syntax score of 28 (IQR=23-29). All procedures were technically successful with no adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis). Under OCT guidance, adequate minimal stent area (MSA) of 13.28 ± 0.77mm2, 8.25 ± 0.29 mm2, and 7.54 ± 0.45mm2 was achieved in LM, left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCx) respectively. Adequate stent expansion of >80% was achieved in all cases. At the end of 1 year, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was 2.2%. Further, one (2.2%) patient developed restenosis of the side branch which was managed conservatively. ConclusionDK mini-Culotte stenting in the distal left main bifurcation has shown promising results and is effective in preventing side branch stent deformation and its sequelae of in-stent restenosis.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions in elderly people.

In the elderly people with unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often selected as first choice treatment strategy because of perioperative high risk of coronary artery bypass graft surgery due to their large number of comorbidities. Also, some recent papers reported that geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is also strongly associated with clinical outcomes after interventional procedures in elderly patients. We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD and the impact of GNRI in elderly patients. We identified 669 non dialysis patients treated with current generation drug-eluting stent for ULMD from MITO registry. We divided the patients to the following 2 groups; elderly group (n = 240, age ≥75) and young group (n = 429, age <75). Additionally, we could calculate GNRI and divided elderly group into 2 group based on the median value of the GNRI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in elderly group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-4.02; p = 0.001]. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in low GNRI elderly group compared to other 2 groups (Adjusted HR of elderly with low GNRI: 3.56, 95%CI (1.77-7.14), p < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality was comparable between two groups. TLR rate was significantly lower in elderly group (adjusted HR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.97; p = 0.035). The elderly had higher all-cause mortality after PCI for ULMD compared to young people. Especially, the elderly with low GNRI were extremely associated with poorer outcomes.

Optical Coherence Tomography Predictors of SIde Branch REstenosis after unprotected Left Main bifurcation angioplasty using double kissing crush technique (OP-SIBRE LM Study).

Among the two stent strategies, contemporary evidence favors double kissing crush technique (DKC) for complex unprotected distal left main bifurcation (UdLMB) lesions. However one of the major challenges to these lesions is side branch (SB) restenosis. Our aim was to identify optical coherence tomographic (OCT) characteristics that may predict SB restenosis (SBR) after UdLMB angioplasty using DKC technique. This was a single-center, retrospective study that included 60 patients with complex UdLMB disease, who underwent OCT-guided angioplasty using DKC technique. Angiographic follow-up was performed in all patients at 1 year to identify patients with SBR. Patients with SBR groupwere compared with patients without SBR(NSBR group) for OCT parameters during index procedure. Twelve (20%) patients developed SBRat 1-year follow-up. The SBR group had longer SB lesion (18.8 ± 3.2 vs. 15.3 ± 3.7 mm, p = 0.004) and neo-metallic carinal length (2.1vs. 0.1 mm, p < 0.001) when compared to the NSBR group. Longer neo-metallic carinal length was associated with the absence of the dumbbell sign, presence of hanging stent struts across the SB ostium on OCT of final MB pullback. On multivariate regression analysis, SB distal reference diameter (DRD) and SB stent expansion were identified as independent predictors of SBRwith SB-DRD of ≤2.8 mm (area under curve-0.73, sensitivity-83.3%, and specificity-62.5%) and SB stent expansion of ≤89% (area under curve-0.88, sensitivity-83.3%, andspecificity- 81.2%) as the best cut off values to predict SBR. SB DRD and SB stent expansion are the OCT predictors of future SBRafter UdLMB angioplasty using DKC technique.

Impact of Stent Expansion Index on Stent Failure After Left Main Stenting

Impact of the stent expansion index (EXPI) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) has been not completely understood especially in current-generation drug-eluting stent (cDES) era. We evaluated the impact of EXPI on clinical outcomes after PCI with cDES for ULMD. We identified 342 patients treated with cDES for ULMD and postintervention intravascular ultrasound between January 2010 and December 2019. In this study, the ratio of minimum stent area (MSA) to reference vessel area at the MSA site was adopted to assess the stent expansion. We defined the patients with the first and second tertile as low-intermediate EXPI group and those with the third tertile as high EXPI group and compared the clinical outcomes between both groups. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF). TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) ,and myocardial infarction. The MSA was located in the ostium of left anterior descending coronary artery in most cases (318 of 342 patients; 93.0%). There were no significant differences between both groups in the baseline clinical, lesion, and procedural characteristics. The high EXPI group had lower TLF rate than the low-intermediate EXPI group (10.2% vs 19.9%, log-rank p=0.033). In conclusion, this is the first report that the higher ratio of MSA to reference vessel area at the MSA site, which was defined as stent EXPI, was associated with more favorable clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD.

Stepwise Provisional versus Planned Double Stenting Strategies in Treating Unprotected Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comprising 11,672 Patients.

Provisional stenting is the preferred strategy for non-left main bifurcation lesions. However, its superiority over planned double stenting for unprotected left main distal bifurcation (UPLMB) lesions remains unclear. Previous studies have reported conflicting results. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the outcomes of provisional stenting to planned double stenting for UPLMB lesions were identified. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation (TVR), target lesion revascularisation (TLR), all-cause death, cardiac death and stent thrombosis (ST). Aggregated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was conducted if was 50% or p 0.01. Publication bias analysis was considered if more than 10 studies were enrolled. Two RCTs and 19 observational studies comprising 11,672 patients were enrolled. Provisional stenting had a significantly lower incidence of MACE, mainly driven by TLR and TVR. Double stenting had a significantly lower incidence of cardiac death. In addition, patients undergoing provisional stenting had a lower tendency towards the occurrence of MI, while patients undergoing double stenting had a lower tendency towards all-cause death and ST. A provisional stenting strategy was associated with lower MACE, TVR and TLR but higher cardiac death. Further investigation is needed through RCTs to assess which strategy performs better.

The impact of chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after current generation drug-eluting stent implantation for left main distal bifurcation lesions: the Milan and New-Tokyo registry

Objectives. The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) is not fully understood in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI using cDES for ULMD according to CKD severity based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Design. We identified 720 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using cDES for ULMD at three high volume centers between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients to the following five groups according to eGFR. Each group was defined as follows: no CKD (60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hemodialysis (HD). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). Results. TLF occurred more frequently in severe CKD and HD group compared with other three groups. Conclusions. The patients who have severe CKD or are on HD, were extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD even with cDES.

Current Evidence and Future Perspective for Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.

Coronary bifurcation lesions account for 15%-20% of all percutaneous coronary interven tions and are associated with greater procedural complexity and consequently at higher risk for cardiac adverse events. Early clinical trials in the interventional approach to bifurcation lesions supported provisional stenting. However, the most recent randomized studies have indicated potentially superior results using a double-kissing crush technique, particularly for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions. Moreover, many operators recently favor double-kissing mini-culotte, nanocrush, and double-kissing nanocrush stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions. In this review, we describe the traditional and novel bifurcation stenting techniques and the current evidence for each and review general principles for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.

Prognostic Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Cardiac Mortality After Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main Distal Bifurcation: the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry

BackgroundThere are scarce data about the incidence and impact on clinical outcomes of target lesion revascularization (TLR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. ObjectivesWe evaluated the incidence and impact on clinical outcomes of TLR after PCI using cDES for ULMD. MethodsWe identified 720 patients treated with cDES for ULMD at New Tokyo Hospital (Matsudo, Japan), San Raffaele Scientific Institute and EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus (Milan, Italy) between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients in 2 groups; TLR group (n = 107), no TLR group (n = 613). The TLR group was comprised patients undergoing a repeat revascularization by PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting of the target lesion. Analysis using propensity score adjustment was also performed. The primary endpoint was cardiac mortality. Additionally, we analyzed the impact of TLR for each main branch (MB) or side branch on cardiac mortality using multivariate Cox regression analysis. ResultsCardiac mortality was significantly higher in TLR group than in no TLR group (adjusted HR 1.96; 95 % CI, 1.50–3.62; p = 0.032). Cardiac mortality was also significantly higher in TLR group after propensity score adjustment. TLR for MB was identified as an independent predictor of cardiac death on multivariate Cox regression analysis. ConclusionsThe TLR, especially the TLR for MB, after PCI even with cDES for ULMD, was strongly associated with worse cardiac mortality.

Impact of Left Main Calcium With Chronic Kidney Disease on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Narrowings (from the Milan and New-Tokyo Registry)

Limited data are available about the association between coronary artery calcification and chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess the association between coronary artery calcification and chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after PCI. We identified 1,391 patients treated with drug-eluting stent for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD), including 604 without calcified lesions (noncalcified left main group) and 787 with calcified ULMD (calcified left main group) in Japan and Italy. We divided the calcified group into the following 2 groups: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 (n=687) and <30 (n=100) and compared the clinical outcomes. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction. TLF occurred more frequently in the calcified group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.71, p=0.01), especially in calcified ULMD with eGFR <30 (adjusted hazard ratio relative to the other 2 groups 2.59, 95% confidence interval 1.60 to 4.18, p <0.001). In conclusion, the calcified ULMD treated with PCI was associated with poorer clinical outcomes than noncalcified ULMD, especially in those with eGFR <30.

The importance of proximal optimization technique with intravascular imaging guided for stenting unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions: The Milan and New-Tokyo registry.

This study evaluated the 5-years outcomes of intracoronary imaging-guided proximal optimization technique (POT) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD). The long-term effects of POT with intracoronary imaging guide in PCI for ULMD have been unclear. Between January 2005 and December 2015, we identified 1832 consecutive patients who underwent DES implantation for ULM distal bifurcation lesions. Of them, 780 (56.1%) patients underwent POT with intravascular imaging guidance (optimal expansion group). Residual 611 (43.9%) patients did not undergo either POT or intravascular imaging or both (suboptimal expansion group). Analysis using propensity score adjustment was performed. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction. TLF rate at 5 years was significantly lower in optimal expansion group than that in suboptimal expansion group [adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI (0.48-0.87), p= 0.004]. Cardiac mortality was significantly lower in optimal expansion group than that in suboptimal expansion group [adjusted HR 0.46, 95% CI (0.27-0.79), p= 0.004]. The multivariable analysis identified POT with intravascular imaging guide [adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI (0.48-0.87), p= 0.004] as an independent predictor of TLF. Intravascular imaging guided POT was strongly associated with the reduced risk of TLF at 5 years after PCI for ULMD, mainly driven by reducing cardiac mortality.

Clinical impact of bifurcation angle change between diastole and systole in complex stenting for left main distal bifurcation: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry.

We assessed the impact of pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bifurcation angle change (BAC) on clinical outcomes. There are little available data about the impact of BAC in unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) PCI. We identified consecutive 300 patients with ULMD underwent complex stenting using drug-eluting stent in three high-volume centers (Tokyo and Milan). We measured the widest BA of ULMD at both end-diastole and end-systole before stenting with two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment and calculated the BAC value as a difference of two BA value in each lesion. We divided them into small and large BAC group according to the median BAC value (7.2°). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction. TLF rate at 3-year was significantly higher in the large BAC group than in the small BAC group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.40-10.1; p< .001). TLR rate for left main (LM) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) and ostial left circumflex artery (LCXos) at 3-year were significantly higher in large BAC group than in small BAC group (adjusted HR 5.91; 95% CI, 2.03-17.2; p= .001 and adjusted HR 10.6; 95% CI, 5.20-21.6; p< .001, respectively). A large BAC before stenting is strongly associated with adverse events after complex stenting for ULMD, mainly driven by repeat PCI for restenosis of the LCXos and of the LM-LAD.

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Distal Bifurcation (From the Milan and New–Tokyo (MITO) Registry)

The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is not fully understood in drug eluting stent era. We identified 512 consecutive DM patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions at New Tokyo Hospital, San Raffaele Scientific Institute and EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus between January 2005 and December 2015. We analyzed according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Each group was defined as follows; no CKD (60 ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45), and severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30). The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction. The rate of TLF was significantly higher in the severe CKD group than that in the other groups (Adjusted HR of severe CKD relative to the others 3.64, [1.86 to 7.11], p < 0.001). Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in the severe CKD group than that in the other groups (Adjusted HR of severe CKD relative to the others 6.43, [2.19 to 18.9], p = 0.001). Target lesion revascularization rate was comparable in 4 groups (Adjusted HR of severe CKD relative to the others 1.71, [0.60 to 4.82], p = 0.31). In conclusions, in DM patients, those with severe CKD was extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Clinical outcomes of double stent strategy for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions using current generation drug eluting stent comparing to early generation drug eluting stent; The Milan and New Tokyo (MITO) registry.

There are only little data available on the comparison of clinical outcomes between a early generation drug eluting stent (eDES) and a current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with double stent strategy (DSS) for unprotected distal left main disease (ULMD). Between April 2005 and December 2015, we recruited 452 consecutive ULMD patients treated with DSS (eDES, 236 patients; cDES, 216 patients). In this study, eDES included Cipher, Taxus, and Endeavor and cDES included Ultimaster, Resolute family, Xience family, Promus family, Synergy, and Nobori. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI) during the median follow-up period of 1,809(IQR: 1,190-2,510) days. In entire population, the rate of overall TLR was significantly lower in cDES group than that in eDES group (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.96, p = .032). The rate of TLR for the ostium of LCX was significantly lower in cDES group than that in eDES group (adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-0.99, p = .047). Cardiac mortality, the rate of TLR for LM-LAD, MI and definite/probable ST did not significantly differ between both groups. The results were preserved in the propensity adjusted population. cDES significantly improved the clinical outcomes in population treated with DSS mainly driven by the reduction of TLR for the ostium of LCX.

P6530Clinical outcomes of dialysis patients treated with current generation DES for left main distal bifurcation

Abstract Objectives We assessed clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (ULM) using current generation drug eluting stents (cDES) in hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to general populations. Methods We identified 1269 consecutive patients who underwent PCI for ULM distal bifurcation lesions. Of them, 563 patients were treated with cDES (512 non HD and 51 HD patients). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). Results HD group was more likely to have diabetes mellitus (70.0% vs. 45.8%, p=0.002), peripheral artery disease (56.0% vs. 14.9%, p&lt;0.001), and lower ejection fraction (52.6% vs. 56.3%, p=0.026). The rate of TLF at 3 years was significantly higher in the HD group (adjusted Hazard ratio [HR] 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54–4.37; p&lt;0.001). Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in the HD group (adjusted HR 4.49; 95% CI, 2.07–9.74; p&lt;0.001). The rates of TLR for LM-left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex ostium (LCXos) were significantly higher in the HD group (LMT-LAD: adjusted HR 3.10; 95% CI, 1.31–7.33; p=0.01, LCXos: adjusted HR 2.56; 95% CI, 1.32–4.94; p=0.005). The rate of MI was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions Hemodialysis was strongly associated with adverse events after PCI for ULM distal bifurcation lesions even with cDES.

3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

ObjectivesThe present study aimed to investigate the difference in target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years after double kissing (DK) crush stenting versus provisional stenting (PS) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation (UPLMb) lesions. BackgroundThe multicenter and randomized DKCRUSH-V (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial) study showed fewer 1-year TLF after DK crush for UPLMb lesions compared with PS. The study reports the 3-year clinical outcome of the DKCRUSH-V study. MethodsA total of 482 patients with UPLMb lesions who were randomly assigned to either the DK crush group (DK group) or PS group in the DKCRUSH-V study were followed for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a TLF at 3 years. Stent thrombosis (ST) was the safety endpoint. Patients were classified by lesion’s complexity and NERS (New Risk Stratification) II or SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score. ResultsAt 3 years, TLF occurred in 41 (16.9%) patients in the PS group and in 20 (8.3%) patients in the DK group (p = 0.005), mainly driven by increased target vessel myocardial infarction (5.8% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.017) and target lesion revascularization (10.3% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.029). Definite or probable ST rate at 3 years was 4.1% in the PS group and 0.4% in the DK group (p = 0.006). Notably, DK crush was associated with a significant reduction in both primary and secondary endpoints for patients with complex lesions or at high risk. ConclusionsProvisional stenting for UPLMb lesions was associated with significantly increased rates of TLF and ST over 3 years of follow-up. Further randomized study is warranted to confirm the benefits of DK crush stenting for complex UPLMb lesions. (Double Kissing and Double Crush versus Provisional T Stenting Technique for the Treatment of Unprotected Distal Left Main True Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized, International, Multi-center Clinical Trial; ChiCTR-TRC-11001213).

Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study.

The present study aimed to investigate the difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years after double-kissing (DK) crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (LMDBLs). The multicenter and randomized DKCRUSH-III (Comparison of double kissing crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective study) showed that DK crush stenting was associated with fewer MACE at 1-year follow-up in patients with LMDBLs compared with culotte stenting. Here, we report the 3-year clinical outcome of the DKCRUSH-III study. A total of 419 patients with LMDBLs who were randomly assigned to either the DK crush or culotte group in the DKCRUSH-III study were followed for 3 year. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a MACE at 3 years. Stent thrombosis (ST) was the safety endpoint. Patients were classified by simple and complex LMDBLs according to the DEFINITION (Definition and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents) study criteria. At 3 years, MACE occurred in 49 patients the culotte group and in 17 patients in the DK crush group (cumulative event rates of 23.7% and 8.2%, respectively; p < 0.001), mainly driven by increased myocardial infarction (8.2% vs. 3.4%, respectively; p = 0.037) and target-vessel revascularization (18.8% vs. 5.8%, respectively; p < 0.001) between groups. Definite ST rate was 3.4% in the culotte group and 0% in the DK crush group (p = 0.007). Complex LMDBLs were associated with a higher rate of MACE (35.3%) at 3 years compared with a rate of 8.1% in patients with simple LMDBLs (p < 0.001), with an extremely higher rate in the culotte group (51.5% vs. 15.1%, p < 0.001). Culotte stenting for LMDBLs was associated with significantly increased rates of MACE and ST. (Double Kissing [DK] Crush Versus Culotte Stenting for the Treatment of Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-III, a Multicenter Randomized Study Comparing Double-Stent Techniques; ChiCTR-TRC-11001877).

Complex percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesion in a patient with cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Introduction: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a progressive form of coronary disease that defines the long term prognosis in heart transplant patients. The mortality of surgical revascularization in post-transplant patients is very high. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a relatively low periprocedural mortality and high acute angiographic success, but still high restenosis rate and poor long-term results. Bypass surgery (CABG) is considered the gold-standard for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease in non-transplant patients, especially with the distal bifurcation lesion. Optimal PCI techniques are needed to improve the results and complex double kissing crush technique seems to be promising. Case Report: We present a case of a 27-year-old patient who received heart transplant at the age of 24. During the second post-transplant year, he developed acute inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction and primary PCI of RCA was performed. An eccentric LMCA stenosis with an involvement of large ramus intermedius (RI) and almost occluded, minor left circumflex (LCx) were detected on control angio. We decided to perform PCI on this complex lesion with double kissing crush technique. Two wires were positioned distally to the lesions in both the LAD and ramus intermedius (RI). A stent was positioned in the RI with few proximal millimeters protruding into the LMCA, a balloon with a length long enough to cover the protruding stent segment was concurrently positioned in the LAD. The RI stent was deployed. The SB stent-balloon and wire were removed. The balloon in LAD was then inflated at a high pressure to crush the protruding RI stent. The RI ostium was rewired and dilated with a balloon. The bifurcation was then kissed with two balloons. Afterwards, a stent was deployed in the LMCA toward LAD at a high pressure. The RI ostium was rewired for the second time through the LMCA stent strut and dilated with a balloon at a high pressure. The final kissing balloon inflation in the bifurcation was performed at a high pressure and finished with proximal optimization of LMCA. The control angio performed 6 months later showed no signs of restenosis. Summary: The treatment of CAV is very challenging and while CABG remains a poor revascularization option, PCI of complex lesions such as those of LMCA require optimal technique to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events and prevent further graft deterioration.

The impact of main branch restenosis on long term mortality following drug‐eluting stent implantation in patients with de novo unprotected distal left main bifurcation coronary lesions: The Milan and New‐Tokyo (MITO) registry

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains one of the main limitations for percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected distal left main (UDLM). This study aims to demonstrate the impact of main-branch ISR (MB-ISR) on mortality and to clarify the optimal strategy. Between 2002 and 2008, 482 consecutive UDLM patients treated with drug eluting stent (sirolimus and paclitaxel) were evaluated. During follow-up period (median 52.6 months), MB-ISR occurred in 29, SB-ISR in 65, and MB/SB-ISR in 24. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the independent predictors of MB-ISR were calcification (HR 2.284, p = 0.016), true-bifurcation (HR 2.331, p = 0.024), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (insulin-DM) (HR 2.259, p = 0.048). Furthermore, final proximal postdilatation (FPPD) (HR 0.548, p = 0.077), full LM cover approach (FCA) (HR 0.605, p = 0.093) and greater MLD (HR 0.611, p = 0.062) had a tendency to reduce MB-ISR. Furthermore, the occurrence of MB-ISR within 1-year was associated with cardiac-death (HR 2.734, p = 0.017). The patients with MB-ISR had more comorbidities and complex lesions, resulting in higher risk of cardiac mortality as compared to the patients without MB-ISR. Presence of calcification, true-bifurcation and insulin-DM were associated with MB-ISR following UDLM intervention, while FCA, FPPD, and greater MLD seemed to be associated with the low occurrence of MB-ISR.

Comparison of Double Kissing Crush Versus Culotte Stenting for Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

The study aimed to investigate the difference in major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 1-year after double kissing (DK) crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (UPLMCA) distal bifurcation lesions. DK crush and Culotte stenting were reported to be effective for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. However, their comparative performance in UPLMCA bifurcation lesions is not known. A total of 419 patients with UPLMCA bifurcation lesions were randomly assigned to DK (n = 210) or Culotte (n = 209) treatment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a MACE at 1 year, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). In-stent restenosis (ISR) at 8 months was secondary endpoint, and stent thrombosis (ST) served as a safety endpoint. Patients were stratified by SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) and NERS (New Risk Stratification) scores. Patients in the Culotte group had significant higher 1-year MACE rate (16.3%), mainly driven by increased TVR (11.0%), compared with the DK group (6.2% and 4.3%, respectively; all p < 0.05). ISR rate in side branch was 12.6% in the Culotte group and 6.8% in the DK group (p = 0.037). Definite ST rate was 1.0% in the Culotte group and 0% in the DK group (p = 0.248). Among patients with bifurcation angle ≥70°, NERS score ≥20, and SYNTAX score ≥23, the 1-year MACE rate in the DK group (3.8%, 9.2%, and 7.1%, respectively) was significantly different to those in the Culotte group(16.5%, 20.4%, and 18.9%, respectively; all p < 0.05). Culotte stenting for UPLMCA bifurcation lesions was associated with significantly increased MACEs, mainly due to the increased TVR. (Double Kissing [DK] Crush Versus Culotte Stenting for the Treatment of Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-III, a Multicenter Randomized Study Comparing Double-Stent Techniques; ChiCTR-TRC-00000151).