Unplanned Critical Care Admission Research Articles

Predictive value of the National Early Warning Score 2 for hospitalised patients with viral respiratory illness is improved by the addition of inspired oxygen fraction as a weighted variable

ObjectivesThe National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is validated for predicting acute deterioration, however, the binary grading of inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) may limit performance. We evaluated the incorporation of...

Outcome following unplanned critical care admission after lung resection

Objective(s)Patients undergoing lung resection are at risk of perioperative complications, many of which necessitate unplanned critical care unit admission in the postoperative period. We sought to characterize this population, providing an up-to-date estimate of the incidence of unplanned critical care admission, and to assess critical care and hospital stay, resource use, mortality, and outcomes. MethodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung resection in participating UK hospitals over 2 years. A comprehensive dataset was recorded for each critical care admission (defined as the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation and/or renal replacement therapy), in addition to a simplified dataset in all patients undergoing lung resection during the study period. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with critical care outcome. ResultsA total of 11,208 patients underwent lung resection in 16 collaborating centers during the study period, and 253 patients (2.3%) required unplanned critical care admission with a median duration of stay of 13 (4-28) days. The predominant indication for admission was respiratory failure (68.1%), with 77.8% of patients admitted during the first 7 days following surgery. Eighty-seven (34.4%) died in critical care. On multivariable regression, only the diagnosis of right ventricular dysfunction and the need for both mechanical ventilation and renal-replacement therapy were independently associated with critical care survival; this model, however, had poor predictive value. ConclusionsAlthough resource-intensive and subject to prolonged stay, following unplanned admission to critical care after lung resection outcomes are good for many patients; 65.6% of patients survived to hospital discharge, and 62.7% were discharged to their own home.

The Impact of Initial Postoperative Destination on Unplanned Critical Care Admissions After Lung Resection

Despite an increasing proportion of patients undergoing lung resection being managed postoperatively in a ward-based environment, studies analyzing the impact of initial postoperative destination (IPD) on perioperative outcomes and unplanned critical care admission (UCCA) are lacking. A single-center retrospective review. A cardiothoracic surgery center in the Northwest of England. A total of 3,841 patients between 2012 and 2018. All patients underwent lung resection. Patients were classified as either IPD ward or IPD critical care. Outcomes assessed included in-hospital and 90-day mortality and UCCA. Differences in mortality rates between groups were assessed using the chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables independently associated with 90-day mortality and UCCA. In total, 23.8% (n=913) of patients went to critical care as their IPD. Overall in-hospital mortality was 1.6% (n=62), and 90-day mortality was 2.9% (n=112). The rate of UCCA was 10.5% (n=404) and was significantly higher for IPD ward patients compared to IPD critical care patients (11.9% v 6.2%, p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality rates after UCCA were 5.2% (IPD ward) and 19.3% (IPD critical care) (p < 0.001). Advanced age, worse pulmonary function, IPD ward, and timing of surgery were all independently associated with UCCA. Most patients undergoing lung resection can be managed safely postoperatively in a ward-based environment. Short-term mortality is higher after UCCA, with patients who experience readmission to critical care at the highest risk of death. Patients should receive additional monitoring immediately following discharge from critical care.

P-OGC06 The effect of surgical complications on long-term prognosis following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer

Abstract Background Globally, oesophageal cancer incidence continues to increase. In recent years, surgical and oncological advancements have increased survival rates. Despite this, survival remains &amp;lt;50% at five-years for patients treated with curative oesophagectomy. Previous data has suggested post-operative complications may play a role in long-term increased mortality in oesophageal cancer patients. This study aimed to examine the effect of adverse in-hospital events following oesophagectomy on the long-term prognosis for oesophageal cancer, including assessing the effect of cumulative complication burden using data from a single high-volume academic unit in the UK. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma was performed to assess the relationship between in-hospital events and long-term survival. Analysis was limited to patients who survived to 90 days post-oesophagectomy (n = 380). Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier survival curves and multivariate cox-regression, adjusting for variables known to influence survival. The absolute magnitude of effect of complications on survival was assessed using the risk-adjusted population attributable fraction (PAF), which estimates the percentage improvement in survival if specified complications were removed. Results Complications occurred in 251 patients (66.1%). ≥CD3a complications (HR1.65, 95%CI 1.15-2.38, p &amp;lt; 0.010) and unplanned critical care admissions (HR2.24, 95%CI 1.45-3.46, p &amp;lt; 0.001) were independently associated with worse prognosis whereas pulmonary complications and anastomotic leak were not. A CCI &amp;gt;30 was the optimum cut-point for OS (HR1.94, 95%CI 1.36-2.78, p &amp;lt; 0.001), and after weighting to remove confounding bias median survival was shorter with CCI&amp;gt;30 (28vs72 months, p &amp;lt; 0.001). There was no difference in median survival when CCI&amp;gt;30 occurred from major or multiple minor complications (31 vs 21 months, p = 0.096). The risk adjusted PAF for CCI&amp;gt;30 was 8.5% (95%CI 3.6-13.1%). Conclusions Long-term survival following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer is significantly affected by major complications and unplanned critical care admissions. The cumulative effect of multiple post-operative minor complications is comparable to the effect of major complications on long-term survival from oesophageal cancer, and cause a substantial number of potentially preventable deaths, even in patients who survive to discharge.

The ROX index has greater predictive validity than NEWS2 for deterioration in Covid-19.

BackgroundPatients admitted to hospital with Covid-19 are at risk of deterioration. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) is widely recommended, however it's validity in Covid-19 is not established and indices more specific for respiratory failure may be more appropriate. We aim to describe the physiological antecedents to deterioration, test the predictive validity of NEWS2 and compare this to the ROX index ([SpO2/FiO2]/respiratory rate).MethodA single centre retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were admitted to a medical ward, between 1/3/20 and 30/5/20, with positive results for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Physiological observations and the NEWS2 were extracted and analysed. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac arrest, unplanned critical care admission or death within 24 hours. A generalized linear model was used to assess the association of physiological values, NEWS2 and ROX with the outcome.FindingsThe primary outcome occurred in 186 patients (26%). In the preceding 24 hours, deterioration was most marked in respiratory parameters, specifically in escalating oxygen requirement; tachypnoea was a late sign, whilst cardiovascular observations remained stable. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.815 (95% CI 0.804–0.826) for NEWS2 and 0.848 (95% CI 0.837–0.858) for ROX. Applying the optimal level of ROX, the majority of patients triggered four hours earlier than with NEWS2 of 5.InterpretationNEWS2 may under-perform in Covid-19 due to intrinsic limitations of the design and the unique pathophysiology of the disease. A simple index utilising respiratory parameters can outperform NEWS2 in predicting the occurrence of adverse events.

Trial of remote continuous versus intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): a feasibility randomised controlled trial

BackgroundDespite medical advances, major surgery remains high risk with up to 44% of patients experiencing postoperative complications. Early recognition of postoperative complications is crucial in reducing morbidity and preventing long-term disability. The current standard of care is intermittent manual vital signs monitoring, but new wearable remote monitors offer the benefits of continuous vital signs monitoring without limiting the patient’s mobility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and clinical outcomes of continuous remote monitoring after major surgery.MethodsThe study was a randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel group, feasibility trial. Adult patients undergoing elective major surgery were randomly assigned to receive continuous remote monitoring and normal National Early Warning Score (NEWS) monitoring (intervention group) or normal NEWS monitoring alone (control group). Continuous remote monitoring was achieved using the SensiumVitals® wireless patch which is worn on the patient’s chest and monitors heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature continuously, and alerts the nurse when there is deviation from pre-set physiological norms. Feasibility was assessed by evaluating recruitment rate, adherence to protocol and randomisation and the amount of missing data. Clinical outcomes included time to antibiotics in cases of sepsis, length of hospital stay, number of critical care admissions and rate of hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-six patients were randomised between October 2018 and April 2019: 67 to the control group and 69 to the intervention group. Recruitment was completed prior to the 12 month target with a high rate of eligibility and consent. Missing data was limited only to questionnaire responses; no participants were lost to follow-up and only one participant was withdrawn due to loss of capacity. The number of patients classed as ‘drop-out’ due to design (8.1%) were less than anticipated, and there were no participants who crossed over into the alternative trial allocation group. Seventeen participants in the intervention group (28%) did not adhere to the monitoring protocol. No formal comparisons between arms was undertaken; however, participants had fewer unplanned critical care admissions (1 versus 5) and had a shorter average length of hospital stay (11.6 days (95% confidence interval 9.5–13.7 days) versus 16.2 days (95% confidence interval 11.3–21.2 days)) in the continuous vital signs monitoring group. The time taken to receive antibiotics in cases of sepsis was similar in both arms. A cost-utility analysis indicated that the remote monitoring system was cost-saving when compared to standard NEWS monitoring alone.ConclusionsIt is feasible to perform a large-scale randomised controlled trial of continuous remote monitoring after major surgery. Progression to a definitive multicentre randomised controlled trial would be appropriate, taking consideration of factors, such as patient adherence, that might mask the potential benefit of additional monitoring.Trial registrationISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN16601772. Registered 30 August 2017.

The safety of paediatric surgery between COVID‐19 surges: an observational study

SummaryDespite the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, elective paediatric surgery must continue safely through the first, second and subsequent waves of disease. This study presents outcome data from a children's hospital in north‐west England, the region with the highest prevalence of COVID‐19 in England. Children and young people undergoing elective surgery isolated within their household for 14 days, then presented for real‐time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) within 72 h of their procedure (or rapid testing within 24 h in high‐risk cases), and completed a screening questionnaire on admission. Planned surgery resumed on 26 May 2020; in the four subsequent weeks, there were 197 patients for emergency and 501 for elective procedures. A total of 488 out of 501 (97.4%) elective admissions proceeded, representing a 2.6% COVID‐19‐related cancellation rate. There was no difference in the incidence of SARS‐CoV‐2 among children and young people who had or had not isolated for 14 days (p > 0.99). One out of 685 (0.1%) children who had surgery re‐presented to the hospital with symptoms potentially consistent with SARS‐CoV‐2 within 14 days of surgery. Outcomes were similar to those in the same time period in 2019 for length of stay (p = 1.0); unplanned critical care admissions (p = 0.59); and 14‐day hospital re‐admission (p = 0.17). However, the current cohort were younger (p = 0.037); of increased complexity (p < 0.001) and underwent more complex surgery (p < 0.001). The combined use of household self‐isolation, testing and screening questionnaires has allowed the re‐initiation of elective paediatric surgery at high volume while maintaining pre‐COVID‐19 outcomes in children and young people undergoing surgery. This may provide a model for addressing the ongoing challenges posed by COVID‐19, as well as future pandemics.

Critical care after major surgery: a systematic review of risk factors for unplanned admission.

Critical care admission may be necessary for surgical patients requiring organ support or invasive monitoring in the peri-operative period. Unplanned critical care admission poses a potential risk to patients and pressure on services. Existing guidelines base admission criteria on predicted risk of 30-day mortality; however, this may not provide the best predictor of which patients would benefit from this service, and how unplanned admission might be avoided. A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane database and the grey literature identified 44 studies assessing risk factors for unplanned critical care admission in adult populations undergoing non-cardiac, non-thoracic and non-neurological surgery. Comparative, quantitative analysis of the admission criteria was not feasible due to heterogeneity in study design. Age, anaemia, ASA physical status, body mass index, comorbidity burden, emergency surgery, high-risk surgery, male sex, obstructive sleep apnoea, increased blood loss and operative duration were all independent risk factors for unplanned critical care admission. Age, body mass index, comorbidity extent and emergency surgery were the most common independent risk factors identified in the USA, UK, Asia and Australia. These risk factors could be used in the development of a risk tool or decision tree for determining which patients might benefit from planned critical care admission. Future work should involve testing the sensitivity and specificity of these measures, either alone or in combination, to guide planned critical care admission, reduce patient deterioration and unplanned admissions.

Ventilatory inefficiency adversely affects outcomes and longer-term survival after planned colorectal cancer surgery

BackgroundImpaired cardiorespiratory reserve is an accepted risk factor for patients having major surgery. Ventilatory inefficiency, defined by an elevated ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide excretion (VE/VCO2), and measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), is a pathophysiological characteristic of patients with cardiorespiratory disease. We set out to evaluate the prevalence of ventilatory inefficiency in a colorectal cancer surgical population, and its influence on surgical outcomes and long-term cancer survival. MethodsIn this retrospective study of 1375 patients who had undergone preoperative CPET followed by colorectal cancer surgery, we used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify an optimal value of VE/VCO2 associated with 90-day mortality. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate whether this degree of ventilatory inefficiency was independently associated with decreased survival, both after surgery and in the longer term. ResultsWe identified an optimal VE/VCO2 >39 cut-off for predicting 90-day mortality; 245 patients (17.8%) had VE/VCO2 >39, of which 138 (10% of total cohort) had no known cardiorespiratory risk factors. Ventilatory inefficiency was independently associated with death at 90-days (8.2% mortality vs 1.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09–7.84), with death after unplanned critical care admission (OR=4.45; 95% CI, 1.37–14.46) and with decreased survival at 2 yr (OR=2.21; 95%, 1.49–3.28) and 5 yr (OR=2.87; 95% CI, 1.54–5.37) after surgery. ConclusionsA significant proportion of patients having colorectal cancer surgery have ventilatory inefficiency observed on CPET, the majority of whom have no history of cardiorespiratory risk factors. This group of patients has significantly decreased survival both after surgery and in the long-term, irrespective of cancer stage. Survival might be improved by formal medical evaluation and intervention in this group.

Critical care usage after major gastrointestinal and liver surgery: a prospective, multicentre observational study

BackgroundPatient selection for critical care admission must balance patient safety with optimal resource allocation. This study aimed to determine the relationship between critical care admission, and postoperative mortality after abdominal surgery. MethodsThis prespecified secondary analysis of a multicentre, prospective, observational study included consecutive patients enrolled in the DISCOVER study from UK and Republic of Ireland undergoing major gastrointestinal and liver surgery between October and December 2014. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore associations between critical care admission (planned and unplanned) and mortality, and inter-centre variation in critical care admission after emergency laparotomy. ResultsOf 4529 patients included, 37.8% (n=1713) underwent planned critical care admissions from theatre. Some 3.1% (n=86/2816) admitted to ward-level care subsequently underwent unplanned critical care admission. Overall 30-day mortality was 2.9% (n=133/4519), and the risk-adjusted association between 30-day mortality and critical care admission was higher in unplanned [odds ratio (OR): 8.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.51–19.97) than planned admissions (OR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.43–3.85). Some 26.7% of patients (n=1210/4529) underwent emergency laparotomies. After adjustment, 49.3% (95% CI: 46.8–51.9%, P<0.001) were predicted to have planned critical care admissions, with 7% (n=10/145) of centres outside the 95% CI. ConclusionsAfter risk adjustment, no 30-day survival benefit was identified for either planned or unplanned postoperative admissions to critical care within this cohort. This likely represents appropriate admission of the highest-risk patients. Planned admissions in selected, intermediate-risk patients may present a strategy to mitigate the risk of unplanned admission. Substantial inter-centre variation exists in planned critical care admissions after emergency laparotomies.

Using predicted 30 day mortality to plan postoperative colorectal surgery care: a cohort study

BackgroundPreoperative identification of high-risk surgical patients might help to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. Using a patient’s predicted 30 day mortality to plan postoperative high-dependency unit (HDU) care after elective colorectal surgery might be associated with reduced postoperative morbidity. MethodsThe 30 day postoperative mortality was predicted for 504 elective colorectal surgical patients in a preoperative clinic. The prediction was used to determine postoperative surgical ward or HDU care. Those with a predicted 30 day mortality of 1–3% mortality, and thus deemed at intermediate risk, had either planned HDU care (n=68) or planned ward care (n=139). The main outcome measures were emergency laparotomy and unplanned critical care admission. ResultsThere were more emergency laparotomies and unplanned critical care admissions in patients with a predicted 30 day mortality of 1–3% who went to an HDU after surgery compared with patients who went to a ward: 0 vs 14 (10%), P=0.0056 and 0 vs 22 (16%), P=0.0002, respectively. ConclusionsPlanned postoperative critical care was associated with a lower rate of complications after elective colorectal surgery.

The South African Surgical Outcomes Study: A 7-day prospective observational cohort study.

Non-cardiac surgical morbidity and mortality is a major global public health burden. Sub-Saharan African perioperative outcome data are scarce. South Africa (SA) faces a unique public health challenge, engulfed as it is by four simultaneous epidemics: (i) poverty-related diseases; (ii) non-communicable diseases; (iii) HIV and related diseases; and (iv) injury and violence. Understanding the effects of these epidemics on perioperative outcomes may provide an important perspective on the surgical health of the country. To investigate the perioperative mortality and need for critical care admission in patients undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery in SA. A 7-day national, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of all patients ≥16 years of age undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery between 19 and 26 May 2014 at 50 public sector, government-funded hospitals in SA. The study included 3 927/4 021 eligible patients (97.7%) recruited, with 45/50 hospitals (90.0%) submitting data that described all eligible patients. Crude in-hospital mortality was 123/3 927 (3.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6 - 3.7). The rate of postoperative admission to critical care units was 255/3,927 (6.5%; 95% CI 5.7 - 7.3), with 43.5% of admissions being unplanned. Of the surgical procedures 2,120/3,915 (54.2%) were urgent or emergency ones, with a population-attributable risk for mortality of 25.5% (95% CI 5.1 - 55.8) and a risk of admission to critical care of 23.7% (95% CI 4.7 - 51.4). Most patients in SA's public sector hospitals undergo urgent and emergency surgery, which is strongly associated with mortality and unplanned critical care admissions. Non-communicable diseases have a larger proportional contribution to mortality than infections and injuries. However, the most common comorbidity, HIV infection, was not associated with in-hospital mortality. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02141867).

Factors Associated With Survival After Resection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma in 314 Patients

specialized preoperative clinics may improve resource allocation and postoperative outcome. Background. An analysis of perioperative factors that were independently associated with survival up to 1000 days after scheduled colorectal adenocarcinoma resections in 314 patients. Methods. The association of 16 perioperative variables with postoperative survival and critical care unit (CCU) admission after scheduled resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma between September 2005 and March 2009 was analysed using multivariable Cox regression analyses and Fisher’s exact tests. Results. We followed survivors for a mean of 983 days (range 696–1000 days). Average annual postoperative mortality was 8.5%, 14% after surgery performed in 2005, and 3% after surgery in 2009. Risk of mortality was independently associated with five variables after stratifying for date of surgery: attending a preoperative high-risk clinic [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, P¼0.006], worse World Health Organization performance status (HR 2.1, P¼0.001), BMI (HR 0.92, P¼0.009), higher nodal stage (HR 2.6, P,0.0001), and unplanned critical care admission (HR 7.2, P,0.0001). Patients who attended the preoperative clinic (207) were older, with worse renal function and ASA grade, than those who did not (107). Planned postoperative critical care admission was more common in patients who attended the high-risk clinic (24% vs 12%, P¼0.01) and may have partly accounted for the observed mortality difference.

Factors associated with survival after resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma in 314 patients

An analysis of perioperative factors that were independently associated with survival up to 1000 days after scheduled colorectal adenocarcinoma resections in 314 patients. The association of 16 perioperative variables with postoperative survival and critical care unit (CCU) admission after scheduled resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma between September 2005 and March 2009 was analysed using multivariable Cox regression analyses and Fisher's exact tests. We followed survivors for a mean of 983 days (range 696-1000 days). Average annual postoperative mortality was 8.5%, 14% after surgery performed in 2005, and 3% after surgery in 2009. Risk of mortality was independently associated with five variables after stratifying for date of surgery: attending a preoperative high-risk clinic [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, P=0.006], worse World Health Organization performance status (HR 2.1, P=0.001), BMI (HR 0.92, P=0.009), higher nodal stage (HR 2.6, P<0.0001), and unplanned critical care admission (HR 7.2, P<0.0001). Patients who attended the preoperative clinic (207) were older, with worse renal function and ASA grade, than those who did not (107). Planned postoperative critical care admission was more common in patients who attended the high-risk clinic (24% vs 12%, P=0.01) and may have partly accounted for the observed mortality difference. Immediate perioperative care may have prolonged effects on postoperative survival. Specialized preoperative assessment clinics may reduce mortality after colorectal surgery.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures.

Despite advances in perioperative care, elective major vascular surgical procedures carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Remote ischaemic preconditioning is initiated by brief, non-lethal periods of ischaemia in a vascular bed different from the one which will be subjected to ischaemic insult during surgery. It has the potential to provide local tissue protection from further prolonged periods of ischaemia. The aim of this review was to compare the outcomes from vascular and endovascular surgical procedures with and without the use of remote ischaemic preconditioning. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (June 2011) and CENTRAL (2011, Issue 2). The authors searched MEDLINE via PubMed (July 2011), EMBASE (June 2011), and Science Citation Index Expanded (July 2011). We considered for inclusion all randomised controlled trials that evaluated the role of remote ischaemic preconditioning in reducing mortality and systemic injury in patients undergoing open vascular or endovascular surgery. We collected the data on characteristics of the trial, methodological quality, the remote ischaemic preconditioning stimulus used, mortality, morbidity, operating time and hospital stay from each trial. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using RevMan analysis. For each outcome we calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) based on an intention-to-treat analysis. We included four studies with a total of 115 patients randomised to undergo a vascular procedure with remote ischaemic preconditioning and 117 patients randomised to have the procedure without remote ischaemic preconditioning. None of the trials were of low risk of bias. There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.72). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for all other outcomes except reduced risk of myocardial infarction in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group, which was significant by the fixed-effect model (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.90) but not by the random-effects model (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.08). This positive effect was from the results of only one trial and was not consistently observed. Furthermore, it was noted that there was an observed trend of high incidence of unplanned critical care admission in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group, although this was not statistically significant (RR 2.15, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.33). Based on current evidence from small pilot trials, there are too few data to be able to say whether remote ischaemic preconditioning has any beneficial or harmful effects. The safety of this technique needs to be confirmed in adequately powered trials. Therefore, further randomised trials on this technique are required.

Investigating the effectiveness of critical care outreach services: a systematic review

We explored the impact of critical care outreach activity on patient and service outcomes and aimed to contribute to developing a typology of critical care outreach services. Following a sample search of Medline 15 relevant electronic databases were systematically searched from 1996 to 2004. Searches for publications from nine key authors and citations of eight key articles were performed. Hand searches of journals, bibliographies of reports and review articles, and conference abstracts were conducted. Relevant experts were contacted. A further two studies published after the review date were also included. Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion, conducted quality assessment and extracted data. Data were synthesised using narrative techniques. Seventeen papers and six brief reports were selected for inclusion from a list of 1,760 titles. As anticipated with a relatively new service such as critical care outreach, there were few controlled trials. There were two randomised controlled trials, 16 uncontrolled before and after studies, three quasi-experimental studies, one controlled before and after study and one post-only controlled study. The most frequent outcomes measured were mortality, cardiac arrest, unplanned critical care admissions from wards, length of stay, and critical care readmission rates. Although improvements in patient outcomes were found, the evidence in this review is insufficient to demonstrate this conclusively. The many differences in service delivery do not permit identification of service typology. Our findings point to a need for more comprehensive research of this expanding service in the United Kingdom.

Cardiovascular Events in the Postanesthesia Care Unit

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of four postanesthesia care unit (PACU) cardiovascular events to long-term outcomes (unplanned critical care admission or mortality) and to evaluate the contribution of anesthetic management compared with other perioperative factors in predicting these events. For patients admitted to the PACU after receiving general anesthesia (n = 18,380), the risk of long-term outcomes was examined for patients in the PACU with hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, or hypotension. Using logistic regression (P < 0.05), risk factors (grouped as patients, surgical, anesthetic, operating room observations, and other PACU observations) for each cardiovascular event were determined. For each factor grouping, the relative contributions to each cardiovascular event were compared using maximum likelihood chi-square analysis. Patients in the PACU with hypertension or tachycardia had more unplanned critical care admissions (2.6% and 4.0% vs. 0.2% for patients with no events) and greater mortality (1.9% and 2.3% vs. 0.3% and 0.4%) (P < 0.01). For PACU hypertension (rate 2.0%), age, smoking, renal disease, female gender, and angina were significant risk factors. For PACU tachycardia (0.9%), intraoperative tachycardia and dysrhythmia were the major contributors. Patient factors also increased the risk of bradycardia (2.5%); namely age, ASA physical status 1 or 2, and preoperative beta blocker therapy. For hypotension (2.2%), duration of surgery > 2 h, completion after 6 PM, and gynecologic intraabdominal procedures were significant risk factors. Compared to patient, surgical, intraoperative, or PACU observations, anesthetic factors studied (premedication, induction agent, ventilation, use of opioids) provided only a small contribution in predicting these events. Hypertension and tachycardia in the PACU, although infrequent, are associated with increased risk of unplanned critical care admission and mortality. Patient, surgical, intraoperative, or PACU observations contribute more to cardiovascular events in the PACU than do differences in anesthetic management identified in this study.