Unperturbed Replication Research Articles

SNF2L suppresses nascent DNA gap formation to promote DNA synthesis.

Nucleosome remodelers at replication forks function in the assembly and maturation of chromatin post DNA synthesis. The ISWI chromatin remodeler SNF2L (or SMARCA1) travels with replication forks but its contribution to DNA replication remains largely unknown. We find that fork elongation is curtailed when SNF2L is absent. SNF2L deficiency elevates replication stress and causes fork collapse due to remodeling activities by fork reversal enzymes. Mechanistically, SNF2L regulates nucleosome assembly to suppress post-replicative ssDNA gap accumulation. Gap induction is not dependent on fork remodeling and PRIMPOL. Instead, gap synthesis is driven by MRE11 and EXO1 indicating susceptibility of nascent DNA to nucleolytic cleavage and resection when SNF2L is removed. Additionally, nucleosome remodeling by SNF2L protects nascent chromatin from MNase digestion and gap induction highlighting a critical role of SNF2L in chromatin assembly post DNA synthesis to maintain unperturbed replication.

RTF2 controls replication repriming and ribonucleotide excision at the replisome

DNA replication through a challenging genomic landscape is coordinated by the replisome, which must adjust to local conditions to provide appropriate replication speed and respond to lesions that hinder its progression. We have previously shown that proteasome shuttle proteins, DNA Damage Inducible 1 and 2 (DDI1/2), regulate Replication Termination Factor 2 (RTF2) levels at stalled replisomes, allowing fork stabilization and restart. Here, we show that during unperturbed replication, RTF2 regulates replisome localization of RNase H2, a heterotrimeric enzyme that removes RNA from RNA-DNA heteroduplexes. RTF2, like RNase H2, is essential for mammalian development and maintains normal replication speed. However, persistent RTF2 and RNase H2 at stalled replication forks prevent efficient replication restart, which is dependent on PRIM1, the primase component of DNA polymerase α-primase. Our data show a fundamental need for RTF2-dependent regulation of replication-coupled ribonucleotide removal and reveal the existence of PRIM1-mediated direct replication restart in mammalian cells.

Abstract IA023: The role of RTF2 in replication and replication stress response

Abstract The replisome faithfully coordinates the essential process of genome duplication despite genomic sequences or lesions that slow or stall replication fork progression, collectively termed replication stress. Such lesions threaten the accurate transmission of the genome; as such, cells have evolved many mechanisms of replication fork protection and repair to ensure that the genome is fully replicated within the confines of S phase. Our group has previously characterized the essential protein Replication Termination Factor 2 (RTF2) as one such facilitator of replication control during both unperturbed and stalled conditions. During unperturbed replication, RTF2 localizes the Ribonuclease H2 heterotrimer (RNase H2) to replication forks, where RNase H2 facilitates the removal of ribonucleotides aberrantly incorporated into the genome to ensure replication fork speeds and promote the completion of genome duplication. When the replisome encounters fork-stalling lesions, however, RTF2-RNase H2 are removed from the replisome through the action of proteasome shuttle proteins DNA Damage Inducible 1 and 2 (DDI1/2) to promote replication restart dependent upon PRIM1, the primase subunit of DNA polymerase α. Further, we find that cells depleted of RTF2 accumulate mitotic markers, including phosphorylated FOXM1 and cyclin B1, during S phase and exhibit abnormal nuclear structures. Together, these findings suggest that RTF2-deficient cells bypass the S/G2 checkpoint, in which ATR functions to suppress CDK1 activity and mitotic progression while replication is ongoing and implicate RTF2 as a mediator of replication checkpoint control. Citation Format: Agata Smogorzewska, Cayla Broton, Nicolas J. Blobel, Brooke Conti. The role of RTF2 in replication and replication stress response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: DNA Damage Repair: From Basic Science to Future Clinical Application; 2024 Jan 9-11; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(1 Suppl):Abstract nr IA023.

SUMOylation of HNRNPA2B1 modulates RPA dynamics during unperturbed replication and genotoxic stress responses

Replication protein A (RPA) is a major regulator of eukaryotic DNA metabolism involved in multiple essential cellular processes. Maintaining appropriate RPA dynamics is crucial for cells to prevent RPA exhaustion, which can lead to replication fork breakage and replication catastrophe. However, how cells regulate RPA availability during unperturbed replication and in response to stress has not been well elucidated. Here, we show that HNRNPA2B1SUMO functions as an endogenous inhibitor of RPA during normal replication. HNRNPA2B1SUMO associates with RPA through recognizing the SUMO-interacting motif (SIM) of RPA to inhibit RPA accumulation at replication forks and impede local ATR activation. Declining HNRNPA2SUMO induced by DNA damage will release nuclear soluble RPA to localize to chromatin and enable ATR activation. Furthermore, we characterize that HNRNPA2B1 hinders homologous recombination (HR) repair via limiting RPA availability, thus conferring sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. These findings establish HNRNPA2B1 as a critical player in RPA-dependent surveillance networks.

POLθ processes ssDNA gaps and promotes replication fork progression in BRCA1-deficient cells.

Polymerase theta (POLθ) is an error-prone DNA polymerase whose loss is synthetically lethal in cancer cells bearing breast cancer susceptibility proteins 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) mutations. To investigate the basis of this genetic interaction, we utilized a small-molecule inhibitor targeting the POLθ polymerase domain. We found that POLθ processes single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps that emerge in the absence of BRCA1, thus promoting unperturbed replication fork progression and survival of BRCA1 mutant cells. A genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen uncovered suppressors of the functional interaction between POLθ and BRCA1, including NBN, a component of the MRN complex, and cell-cycle regulators such as CDK6. While the MRN complex nucleolytically processes ssDNA gaps, CDK6 promotes cell-cycle progression, thereby exacerbating replication stress, a feature of BRCA1-deficient cells that lack POLθ activity. Thus, ssDNA gap formation, modulated by cell-cycle regulators and MRN complex activity, underlies the synthetic lethality between POLθ and BRCA1, an important insight for clinical trials with POLθ inhibitors.

Abstract 2128: Single-cell replication dynamics in genomically unstable cancers

Abstract Background: Single-cell whole genome sequencing (scWGS) methods such as direct library preparation (DLP) provide amplification-free capture of cells in all cycle phases and have enabled rich interrogation into the cell to cell genomic diversity of cancer genomes. Previous DLP-driven clonal evolution studies removed S-phase cells as replicated loci confounded phylogenetic inference from somatic copy number aberrations (CNAs), leaving single-cell replication timing (scRT) as an unstudied property. We thus developed a method that assigned S-phase cells to phylogenetic clones and used such assignments to infer scRT profiles in aneuploid cell lines and tumors. We applied this method to determine the relative proliferation rate between clones and obtain a single-cell picture of DNA replication fork progression for genomically unstable cancers. Methods: S-phase cells were assigned to phylogenetic clones based on copy number profile similarity and subsequently scRT profiles were inferred by normalizing out the effects of clonal, subclonal, and cell-specific CNAs before binarizing each genomic bin as replicated or unreplicated. scRT heterogeneity was quantified via a summary statistic representing the aggregate difference between expected and observed replication times (T-width). The scRT profiles were grouped into clone- and sample-level pseudobulks (aggregations of single cells) to determine genomic regions with differential replication timing. We then assessed the ability of S-phase enrichment to predict clonal expansions on time-series patient-derived xenografts of HER2+ and triple negative breast cancers that were either treatment-naive or exposed to cisplatin. In addition, we studied genetically engineered cell lines with inactivated DNA damage response genes (TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2) and primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer samples to quantify scRT heterogeneity at different states of genomic instability. Results: We analyzed 15 datasets containing over 25,000 cells with ~1/3 of cells in S-phase. Time-series datasets revealed that S-phase enriched clones were highly proliferative in the treatment-naive setting and were most sensitive to cisplatin. T-width values calculated from inferred scRT profiles increased as a function of genomic instability, with the degree of heterogeneity varied between genomic regions. Clone-level pseudobulk replication timing profiles revealed that whole-chromosome aneuploidies were more likely to have unperturbed replication timing compared to complex structural variants such as translocations, inversions, and micronuclei. Conclusions: Our time-series results show that S-phase cells enable the prediction of clone-specific proliferation and chemosensitivity using scWGS data from a single time point. The quantification of scRT heterogeneity across our collection of data implicates dysfunctional DNA replication as both driver and consequence of genomic instability. Citation Format: Adam C. Weiner, Andrew McPherson, Sohrab P. Shah. Single-cell replication dynamics in genomically unstable cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2128.

A basal-level activity of ATR links replication fork surveillance and stress response

Mammalian cells use diverse pathways to prevent deleterious consequences during DNA replication, yet the mechanism by which cells survey individual replisomes to detect spontaneous replication impediments at the basal level, and their accumulation during replication stress, remain undefined. Here, we used single-molecule localization microscopy coupled with high-order-correlation image-mining algorithms to quantify the composition of individual replisomes in single cells during unperturbed replication and under replicative stress. We identified a basal-level activity of ATR that monitors and regulates the amounts of RPA at forks during normal replication. Replication-stress amplifies the basal activity through the increased volume of ATR-RPA interaction and diffusion-driven enrichment of ATR at forks. This localized crowding of ATR enhances its collision probability, stimulating the activation of its replication-stress response. Finally, we provide a computational model describing how the basal activity of ATR is amplified to produce its canonical replication stress response.

Mechanisms for Maintaining Eukaryotic Replisome Progression in the Presence of DNA Damage.

The eukaryotic replisome coordinates template unwinding and nascent-strand synthesis to drive DNA replication fork progression and complete efficient genome duplication. During its advancement along the parental template, each replisome may encounter an array of obstacles including damaged and structured DNA that impede its progression and threaten genome stability. A number of mechanisms exist to permit replisomes to overcome such obstacles, maintain their progression, and prevent fork collapse. A combination of recent advances in structural, biochemical, and single-molecule approaches have illuminated the architecture of the replisome during unperturbed replication, rationalised the impact of impediments to fork progression, and enhanced our understanding of DNA damage tolerance mechanisms and their regulation. This review focusses on these studies to provide an updated overview of the mechanisms that support replisomes to maintain their progression on an imperfect template.

A Distinct Basal-Level Activity of ATR Facilitates Replication Fork Surveillance

Mammalian cells employ diverse pathways to prevent deleterious consequences during DNA replication, yet the mechanism by which cells survey individual replisomes to detect spontaneous replication impediments at the basal level, and their accumulation during replication stress, remains undefined. Here, we utilized Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy coupled with High-Order-Correlation image data-mining algorithms, to quantify the spatial configurations of individual replisomes in single cells during unperturbed replication and under replicative stress. We identified a distinct basal-level activity of ATR that monitors and regulates the amounts of RPA at forks to prevent its accumulation. Replication-stress amplifies the basal activity of ATR through increased volume of ATR-RPA interaction and enrichment of ATR at forks. This localized crowding of ATR enhances its collision probability, stimulating the activation of its replication-stress response. Finally, we provide a computational model describing how the basal activity of ATR is amplified to produce its canonical replication-stress response.

Two components of DNA replication-dependent LexA cleavage

Induction of the SOS response, a cellular system triggered by DNA damage in bacteria, depends on DNA replication for the generation of the SOS signal, ssDNA. RecA binds to ssDNA, forming filaments that stimulate proteolytic cleavage of the LexA transcriptional repressor, allowing expression of > 40 gene products involved in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation. Here, using a DNA replication system reconstituted in vitro in tandem with a LexA cleavage assay, we studied LexA cleavage during DNA replication of both undamaged and base-damaged templates. Only a ssDNA-RecA filament supported LexA cleavage. Surprisingly, replication of an undamaged template supported levels of LexA cleavage like that induced by a template carrying two site-specific cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. We found that two processes generate ssDNA that could support LexA cleavage. 1) During unperturbed replication, single-stranded regions formed because of stochastic uncoupling of the leading-strand DNA polymerase from the replication fork DNA helicase, and 2) on the damaged template, nascent leading-strand gaps were generated by replisome lesion skipping. The two pathways differed in that RecF stimulated LexA cleavage during replication of the damaged template, but not normal replication. RecF appears to facilitate RecA filament formation on the leading-strand ssDNA gaps generated by replisome lesion skipping.

Symmetric activity of DNA polymerases at and recruitment of exonuclease ExoR and of PolA to the Bacillus subtilis replication forks.

DNA replication forks are intrinsically asymmetric and may arrest during the cell cycle upon encountering modifications in the DNA. We have studied real time dynamics of three DNA polymerases and an exonuclease at a single molecule level in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis. PolC and DnaE work in a symmetric manner and show similar dwell times. After addition of DNA damage, their static fractions and dwell times decreased, in agreement with increased re-establishment of replication forks. Only a minor fraction of replication forks showed a loss of active polymerases, indicating relatively robust activity during DNA repair. Conversely, PolA, homolog of polymerase I and exonuclease ExoR were rarely present at forks during unperturbed replication but were recruited to replications forks after induction of DNA damage. Protein dynamics of PolA or ExoR were altered in the absence of each other during exponential growth and during DNA repair, indicating overlapping functions. Purified ExoR displayed exonuclease activity and preferentially bound to DNA having 5′ overhangs in vitro. Our analyses support the idea that two replicative DNA polymerases work together at the lagging strand whilst only PolC acts at the leading strand, and that PolA and ExoR perform inducible functions at replication forks during DNA repair.

Mcm10 has potent strand-annealing activity and limits translocase-mediated fork regression

The 11-subunit eukaryotic replicative helicase CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2-7, GINS) tightly binds Mcm10, an essential replication protein in all eukaryotes. Here we show that Mcm10 has a potent strand-annealing activity both alone and in complex with CMG. CMG-Mcm10 unwinds and then reanneals single strands soon after they have been unwound in vitro. Given the DNA damage and replisome instability associated with loss of Mcm10 function, we examined the effect of Mcm10 on fork regression. Fork regression requires the unwinding and pairing of newly synthesized strands, performed by a specialized class of ATP-dependent DNA translocases. We show here that Mcm10 inhibits fork regression by the well-known fork reversal enzyme SMARCAL1. We propose that Mcm10 inhibits the unwinding of nascent strands to prevent fork regression at normal unperturbed replication forks, either by binding the fork junction to form a block to SMARCAL1 or by reannealing unwound nascent strands to their parental template. Analysis of the CMG-Mcm10 complex by cross-linking mass spectrometry reveals Mcm10 interacts with six CMG subunits, with the DNA-binding region of Mcm10 on the N-face of CMG. This position on CMG places Mcm10 at the fork junction, consistent with a role in regulating fork regression.

Role of the Mre11 Complex in Preserving Genome Integrity.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are hazardous lesions that threaten genome integrity and cell survival. The DNA damage response (DDR) safeguards the genome by sensing DSBs, halting cell cycle progression and promoting repair through either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2/Nbs1 (MRX/N) complex is central to the DDR through its structural, enzymatic, and signaling roles. The complex tethers DNA ends, activates the Tel1/ATM kinase, resolves protein-bound or hairpin-capped DNA ends, and maintains telomere homeostasis. In addition to its role at DSBs, MRX/N associates with unperturbed replication forks, as well as stalled replication forks, to ensure complete DNA synthesis and to prevent chromosome rearrangements. Here, we summarize the significant progress made in characterizing the MRX/N complex and its various activities in chromosome metabolism.

PCNA ubiquitylation ensures timely completion of unperturbed DNA replication in fission yeast.

PCNA ubiquitylation on lysine 164 is required for DNA damage tolerance. In many organisms PCNA is also ubiquitylated in unchallenged S phase but the significance of this has not been established. Using Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we demonstrate that lysine 164 ubiquitylation of PCNA contributes to efficient DNA replication in the absence of DNA damage. Loss of PCNA ubiquitylation manifests most strongly at late replicating regions and increases the frequency of replication gaps. We show that PCNA ubiquitylation increases the proportion of chromatin associated PCNA and the co-immunoprecipitation of Polymerase δ with PCNA during unperturbed replication and propose that ubiquitylation acts to prolong the chromatin association of these replication proteins to allow the efficient completion of Okazaki fragment synthesis by mediating gap filling.

Multiple G-quartet structures in pre-edited mRNAs suggest evolutionary driving force for RNA editing in trypanosomes.

Mitochondrial transcript maturation in African trypanosomes requires a U-nucleotide specific RNA editing reaction. In its most extreme form hundreds of U’s are inserted into and deleted from primary transcripts to generate functional mRNAs. Unfortunately, both origin and biological role of the process have remained enigmatic. Here we report a so far unrecognized structural feature of pre-edited mRNAs. We demonstrate that the cryptic pre-mRNAs contain numerous clustered G-nt, which fold into G-quadruplex (GQ) structures. We identified 27 GQ’s in the different pre-mRNAs and demonstrate a positive correlation between the steady state abundance of guide (g)RNAs and the sequence position of GQ-elements. We postulate that the driving force for selecting G-rich sequences lies in the formation of DNA/RNA hybrid G-quadruplex (HQ) structures between the pre-edited transcripts and the non-template strands of mitochondrial DNA. HQ’s are transcription termination/replication initiation sites and thus guarantee an unperturbed replication of the mt-genome. This is of special importance in the insect-stage of the parasite. In the transcription-on state, the identified GQ’s require editing as a GQ-resolving activity indicating a link between replication, transcription and RNA editing. We propose that the different processes have coevolved and suggest the parasite life-cycle and the single mitochondrion as evolutionary driving forces.

Recombinase and translesion DNA polymerase decrease the speed of replication fork progression during the DNA damage response in Escherichia coli cells

The SOS response is a DNA damage response pathway that serves as a general safeguard of genome integrity in bacteria. Extensive studies of the SOS response in Escherichia coli have contributed to establishing the key concepts of cellular responses to DNA damage. However, how the SOS response impacts on the dynamics of DNA replication fork movement remains unknown. We found that inducing the SOS response decreases the mean speed of individual replication forks by 30–50% in E. coli cells, leading to a 20–30% reduction in overall DNA synthesis. dinB and recA belong to a group of genes that are upregulated during the SOS response, and encode the highly conserved proteins DinB (also known as DNA polymerase IV) and RecA, which, respectively, specializes in translesion DNA synthesis and functions as the central recombination protein. Both genes were independently responsible for the SOS-dependent slowdown of replication fork progression. Furthermore, fork speed was reduced when each gene was ectopically expressed in SOS-uninduced cells to the levels at which they are expressed in SOS-induced cells. These results clearly indicate that the increased expression of dinB and recA performs a novel role in restraining the progression of an unperturbed replication fork during the SOS response.

Poly(ADP-ribose) binding to Chk1 at stalled replication forks is required for S-phase checkpoint activation

Damaged replication forks activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), which catalyses poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) formation; however, how PARP1 or poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is involved in the S-phase checkpoint is unknown. Here we show that PAR, supplied by PARP1, interacts with Chk1 via a novel PAR-binding regulatory (PbR) motif in Chk1, independent of ATR and its activity. iPOND studies reveal that Chk1 associates readily with the unperturbed replication fork and that PAR is required for efficient retention of Chk1 and phosphorylated Chk1 at the fork. A PbR mutation, which disrupts PAR binding, but not the interaction with its partners Claspin or BRCA1, impairs Chk1 and the S-phase checkpoint activation, and mirrors Chk1 knockdown-induced hypersensitivity to fork poisoning. We find that long chains, but not short chains, of PAR stimulate Chk1 kinase activity. Collectively, we disclose a previously unrecognized mechanism of the S-phase checkpoint by PAR metabolism that modulates Chk1 activity at the replication fork.

Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance

Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for genome integrity. Recombination proteins participate in tolerating DNA lesions that interfere with DNA replication, but can also generate toxic recombination intermediates and genetic instability when they are not properly regulated. Here, we have studied the role of the recombination proteins Rad51 and Rad52 at replication forks and replicative DNA lesions. We show that Rad52 loads Rad51 onto unperturbed replication forks, where they facilitate replication of alkylated DNA by non-repair functions. The recruitment of Rad52 and Rad51 to chromatin during DNA replication is a prerequisite for the repair of the non-DSB DNA lesions, presumably single-stranded DNA gaps, which are generated during the replication of alkylated DNA. We also show that the repair of these lesions requires CDK1 and is not coupled to the fork but rather restricted to G2/M by the replicative checkpoint. We propose a new scenario for HR where Rad52 and Rad51 are recruited to the fork to promote DNA damage tolerance by distinct and cell cycle-regulated replicative and repair functions.

The Intra-S Phase Checkpoint Targets Dna2 to Prevent Stalled Replication Forks from Reversing

When replication forks stall at damaged bases or upon nucleotide depletion, the intra-S phase checkpoint ensures they are stabilized and can restart. In intra-S checkpoint-deficient budding yeast, stalling forks collapse, and ∼10% form pathogenic chicken foot structures, contributing to incomplete replication and cell death (Lopes et al., 2001; Sogo et al., 2002; Tercero and Diffley, 2001). Using fission yeast, we report that the Cds1(Chk2) effector kinase targets Dna2 on S220 to regulate, both in vivo and in vitro, Dna2 association with stalled replication forks in chromatin. We demonstrate that Dna2-S220 phosphorylation and the nuclease activity of Dna2 are required to prevent fork reversal. Consistent with this, Dna2 can efficiently cleave obligate precursors of fork regression-regressed leading or lagging strands-on model replication forks. We propose that Dna2 cleavage of regressed nascent strands prevents fork reversal and thus stabilizes stalled forks to maintain genome stability during replication stress.

The UNG2 Arg88Cys variant abrogates RPA-mediated recruitment of UNG2 to single-stranded DNA

In human cell nuclei, UNG2 is the major uracil-DNA glycosylase initiating DNA base excision repair of uracil. In activated B cells it has an additional role in facilitating mutagenic processing of AID-induced uracil at Ig loci and UNG-deficient patients develop hyper-IgM syndrome characterized by impaired class-switch recombination and disturbed somatic hypermutation. How UNG2 is recruited to either error-free or mutagenic uracil processing remains obscure, but likely involves regulated interactions with other proteins. The UNG2 N-terminal domain contains binding motifs for both proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication protein A (RPA), but the relative contribution of these interactions to genomic uracil processing is not understood. Interestingly, a heterozygous germline single-nucleotide variant leading to Arg88Cys (R88C) substitution in the RPA-interaction motif of UNG2 has been observed in humans, but with unknown functional relevance. Here we demonstrate that UNG2-R88C protein is expressed from the variant allele in a lymphoblastoid cell line derived from a heterozygous germ line carrier. Enzyme activity as well as localization in replication foci of UNG2-R88C was similar to that of WT. However, binding to RPA was essentially abolished by the R88C substitution, whereas binding to PCNA was unaffected. Moreover, we show that disruption of the PCNA-binding motif impaired recruitment of UNG2 to S-phase replication foci, demonstrating that PCNA is a major factor for recruitment of UNG2 to unperturbed replication forks. Conversely, in cells treated with hydroxyurea, RPA mediated recruitment of UNG2 to stalled replication forks independently of functional PCNA binding. Modulation of PCNA- versus RPA-binding may thus constitute a functional switch for UNG2 in cells subsequent to genotoxic stress and potentially also during the processing of uracil at the immunoglobulin locus in antigen-stimulated B cells.