Universal Health System Research Articles

1.X.1. Achieving universal health coverage: international lessons from Irish policy implementation

Abstract Health systems all over the world are struggling to meet population health needs and provide timely access to universal healthcare in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 occurred in Ireland in the early years of implementation of a national plan for universal healthcare, called Sláintecare. While many health systems are experiencing a retrenchment on universalism in the context of COVID-19, in Ireland despite tediously slow Sláintecare implementation, the pandemic provided a boost to reform implementation and universalism. The reason for this workshop is to draw on a publicly funded Health Research Board Applied Partnership Award, entitled ‘Foundations’, harnessing lessons from the Irish COVID-19 health system response to inform Sláintecare’s implementation https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/3-70/v1 The objectives of the workshop are to 1) provide academic research evidence from the Irish experience of universal health system reform during and since COVID-19; 2) to give participants space to reflect on the implications of the Irish universal health system reform on international health systems and policy; 3) to actively involve workshop participants in an engaged discussion on implementing universal health coverage in the context of COVID-19. The added value of the workshop is to share learnings from an academic research programme, which is coproducing evidence in partnership with the Irish health system, in a worldwide context, providing relevant and thought-provoking discussion and analysis for an international audience. Four separate inter-related presentations will draw on aspects of the Foundations’ research project. Presentation 1, Prof Sara Burke will outline recent academic literature on universalism and the politics of reform implementation in the context of COVID-19 and present a timeline of universal healthcare reform implementation since 2018 when Sláintecare was adopted by the Irish government (14 mins). Presentation 2, Dr Sarah Parker will detail a specific study which set out to advance understanding of how and to what extent COVID-19 has highlighted opportunities for change that enabled better access to universal, integrated care in Ireland, with a view to informing universal health system reform and implementation (10 mins). Presentation 3, Dr Katharine Schulmann and Carlos Bruen will present findings on the governance of reform implementation and implications for all health systems (10 mins). Presentation 4, Dr Philip Crowley, Health Service Executive (HSE) National Director of Strategy and Research and Chair of the Foundations’ research steering group will reflect how research findings can inform implementing reform and their implications for all health systems (6 mins). There will be four presentations totalling 40 mins, followed by questions and discussion chaired by an international expert/academic on universal health systems. Key messages • COVID-10 has highlighted how universal health coverage is more important than ever, however the pandemic has resulted in some retrenchment on universalism. • While data and research drove health system decision making during the pandemic, embedding research evidence into health system and policy reform remains challenging and can be politically opposed.

Territorial health inequalities in breast cancer mortality across France from 1968 to 2017

Abstract Background Territorial health inequalities are of growing concern in countries with universal health systems. From 2003, three successive national cancer plans were launched in France, aiming to improve prevention and treatment. Regions in France are responsible for strategic and financial management of healthcare within their boundaries, which, until 2016, included up to 8 departments. In this study, we analyze the evolution of between and within-region territorial inequalities in breast cancer mortality over 50 years. Methods We used direct and indirect standardization to analyze trends in breast cancer mortality for women aged 25 to 74 years between 1968 and 2017 in each department of metropolitan France. We analyzed the evolution of relative inequalities over time using standard errors of age-adjusted rates. We used multilevel Poisson regression to estimate how much the regional level contributed to territorial variation. Results Over the period 1968 to 1992, breast cancer standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) increased (+16%) while relative territorial inequalities decreased (-21%). After 1997, SMRs decreased (-23%) but territorial inequalities remained unchanged. In 18 out of 22 regions, inequalities were lower at the end than at the start of the study period. Period proved to be the most important determinant of variation in mortality. However, multilevel models also suggested that the regional level explained most of the remaining variation in each period (from 50% to over 80%). Conclusions Over the study period in most French regions, breast cancer mortality has decreased, and so have relative inequalities. Nevertheless, there is evidence that regions have performed differently. The proportion of variation explained by the regional level suggests the continued relevance of the health system on breast cancer mortality. Key messages • Territorial inequality in breast cancer mortality has decreased in France over the 1968-2017 period. • In most regions, disparities between departments have decreased.

Co-producing research on universal health system reform in the context of COVID-19

Abstract Issue How to co-produce and embed research into universal health system reform implementation in the context of COVID-19. In many respects the pandemic revolutionised the use of data and research, with near real-time data informing key health policy and system decisions. This was evident in the production of publicly available data sets tracking COVID-19 infection as well as health system dashboard tracking activity in real-time and influencing day-to-day decisions made. How can this use of data and research evidence become the norm for all health system reform and policy decisions? Results The Foundations’ research project is a partnership project in place since Autumn 2019. Initially focused on producing evidence to inform the design and implementation of new regional areas with the Department of Health Sláintecare Reform Office and the Irish national Health Service Executive as partners. When COVID-19 occurred all work on the regions was paused the research pivoted to harness the learnings form the COVID-19 response to inform universal health system reform. The partnership applied research nature of the programme allowed research to be coproduced and co-designed with health system leaders, meant the researchers understood if and when it was possible to engage with partners and how to feed result into the health system at the earliest opportunity. Lessons Trust and pre-existing working relationships with partners allowed the research to pivot and to continue during the pandemic. The applied partnership nature of the research meant that at times the health system was very engaged in the research and at other times (eg during COVID waves and surges or the cyber-attack) there was limited engagement. The co-production nature of the research allowed a dynamic, ongoing, two-way learning between the health system and the research team. It is extremely difficult to measure impact of research on health system and reform decisions.

The politics of universal health system reform in the context of COVID-19

Abstract Background Implementing universalism is more a political than a technical project. With this in mind, Ireland devised a ten-year plan through political consensus to deliver universal healthcare - Sláintecare. The COVID-19 pandemic occurred early in its implementation. Methods This is qualitative research drawing on international literature on universal health system reform in the context of COVID-19 as well as the politics of health reform. The overall research programme is co-produced with the Irish health system. A timeline and analysis of the reform journey is drawn from documentary analysis of key policy documents, parliamentary reports and key informant interviews. Results Despite a policy commitment since 2005, universal healthcare implementation only became government policy in Ireland 2018. While whole system reform and implementation progress has been slow, the COVID-19 health system response boosted aspects of universalism and reform. All COVID-related services during the pandemic were universal, free at the point of delivery, as are most new services introduced since 2021. Despite the political consensus holding through a change government and the pandemic, and significant additional investment in the public health system, there remain many obstacles to reform. These include different stakeholder understanding of implementing universalism in Ireland especially in the context of COVID-19, how best to implement universal healthcare and the politics of delivering reform. Conclusions Contrary to other countries’ experience during COVID, Ireland pursued its policy aim of delivering universalism and expanded services provided universally, free at the point of delivery, with a focus on enhanced community care. The universalism applied to COVID-related prevention and care, new women’s health and chronic disease management services. Despite progress, government has yet to legislate for a universal entitlement to care and obstacles to reform implementation remain.

How to not revert to type: learnings from the pandemic response for universal health system reform

Abstract Background Understanding of the opportunities and learnings for health system change that have arisen during the pandemic is still emerging. Situated in the Irish health reform context of Sláintecare, the programme which aims to deliver universal, integrated healthcare, this study set out to generate evidence on the processes that impacted access to universal, integrated care during COVID-19, with a view to informing universal health system reform and implementation. Methods The study, which is qualitative, was underpinned by a co-production approach with Irish health system leadership. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 health system professionals (including managers and frontline workers) from a range of responses to explore their experiences during the pandemic. Following thematic analysis, a complexity-informed approach guided the interpretation of the findings. Results A range of factors facilitated better access to integrated care during the crisis, falling under three key themes (1) nurturing whole-system thinking through a clear, common goal and shared information base; (2) harnessing, sharing and supporting innovation; and (3) prioritizing trust and relationship-building in a human-centred health system. Conclusions Alongside establishing health system structures, we must also incorporate alternative approaches to reform that recognise the value of shared sense-making in an interdependent system, while also allowing for innovation, exploration and learning; and acknowledging the role of social dynamics in driving change.

Comparative Analysis of Treatment Patterns in DoD Beneficiaries With Malignant Central Nervous System Tumors: A Focus on Care Setting.

Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are deadly and disproportionately affect younger men and women in the age range of most active-duty service members. Timely and appropriate treatment is important to both survival and quality of life of patients. Information on treatment factors across direct care (DC) and private sector care (PSC) networks may be important for provider training and staffing for the DoD. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment patterns for patients with MBT within the DoD's universal access Military Health System (MHS), comparing DC and PSC networks. The Military Cancer Epidemiology database was used to identify patients 18 years and older who were diagnosed with an MBT between 1999 and 2014 who received primary treatment. Differences in first treatment type and time from diagnosis to initial treatment between DC and PSC were assessed using chi-square and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. Frequency of treatment initiation beyond the 28-day TRICARE Prime access standard for Specialty Care was also compared between care settings using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Then logistic regression models generated odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with care setting. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests compared survival between DC and PSC. The study included 857 patients, with n = 540 treated in DC and n = 317 treated in PSC. The proportion of patients receiving each initial treatment type did not differ by care setting (P = .622). Median time from diagnosis to initial treatment (interquartile range) varied significantly between DC at 6 (0 to 25) days and PSC at 12 (0 to 37) days for all treatment types combined (P < .001). For all years combined, treatment was initiated beyond 28 days for 21% of patients using DC compared to 31% of patients using PSC (P = .001). The odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days for a patient treated in PSC were 1.61 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.33, P = .012) compared to patients treated in DC when controlling for demographic, military, tumor, and patient variables. Survival did not differ by care setting (P = 1.000). Based on the available data between 1999 and 2014, care setting was associated with differences in time to initial treatment and odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days among DoD beneficiaries with MBT receiving care in the MHS. Information on these differences may help inform MHS leadership decisions on the most appropriate location for military provider training and staffing.

72 Hospital level of service, rural-urban hospital location, and neonatal resuscitation interventions at birth: A population-based study in Alberta, Canada from 2000-2020

Abstract Background Advanced neonatal resuscitation interventions (ANRIs: endotracheal intubation, chest compressions, and epinephrine) are rarely needed for infants born at ≥34 weeks gestational age (GA). However, healthcare providers (HCPs) in community hospitals can encounter the need for ANRIs, while having less experience and resources than HCPs in centers with neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Understanding practice differences between hospitals of different levels of service (LofS) and rural/urban location can inform quality improvement to reduce health disparities. Objectives To examine how hospital level of service and rural/urban location relate to ANRI rates in Alberta, Canada, a universal public health system with standardized Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training. Design/Methods All live births ≥34 weeks GA in Alberta from 2000-2020 inclusive were examined using retrospective, population-level administrative data from the Alberta Perinatal Health Program (APHP). Hospitals (n=97) were contacted to determine annual LofS during the study period, with levels (0,1A/B/C,2,3) based on provincial obstetrical triage for availability of delivery support, cesarean-sections, obstetricians, paediatricians/neonatologists, and NICUs. Hospitals were further subcategorized by population and proximity to metropolitan centers.(Table 1) Rates of individual interventions or any ANRI were compared. Results There were 971,403 live births during the study period with a mean GA of 38.9 weeks; 1.6% were missing ANRI data, 955,835 births were included. Most occurred in hospitals with level 2 (57.4%) or level 3 (21.8%) NICUs; few occurred at sites with no delivery support (Level 0, 0.1%). ANRI rates were intubation (0.8%), chest compression (0.2%), and epinephrine (0.02%), any ANRI (0.96%, ~1/1000 live births). However, chest compression rates progressively decrease, and intubation rates progressively increase as LofS increases.(Table 1, Figure 1) When considering rural/urban location, there were outliers in chest compression rates in remote 0 (25.4/1000 live births) and metro-influenced 1A (30.2/1000 live births), intubation in remote 1C (33.3/1000 live births) and metro 0 (193.5/1000 live births) and epinephrine in metro 0 (64.5/1000 live births). Conclusion In this population-based cohort study of ≥34 weeks births, there were higher chest compressions rates and lower intubations rates at hospitals without NICUs despite standardized training. Reasons for this difference require further investigation; potential solutions such as targeted outreach education and introduction of laryngeal mask airways could be explored.

The economic cost of malaria in Brazil from the perspective of the public health system.

This paper presents an economic evaluation aimed at estimating malaria-related health care expenditures in Brazil from the perspective of the public health system. Comprehensive estimates of the costs of malaria remain scarce, in part because of limited data. Brazil has a universal health system (Sistema Único de Saúde-SUS) in which all cases of malaria are diagnosed and treated. In addition, antimalarial drugs are only available through the SUS. We compiled comprehensive data from multiple administrative sources. Expenditure indicators were calculated for municipalities and states in the Brazilian Amazon, a region where more than 99% of the country's malaria cases are concentrated. We also developed a digital platform that allows interactive visualization of the malaria cost indicators, disaggregated by cost type and geography. Our results show that control and prevention activities are the primary cost in all states, followed by human resources and disease treatment. Expenditures per malaria notification in the Amazon ranged from PPP (purchasing power parity)-US$59.00 (2017) to PPP-US$77.00 (2016), while per capita expenditures remained relatively stable at around PPP-US$3.50. The malaria cost estimates presented here contribute to a better negotiation of the financial resources needed by the NMCP and are one of the critical pieces of information for a strategic plan of activities needed to achieve the elimination goal.

Health care system factors associated with receipt of treatment and treatment intent in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A population-based study in Ontario

PurposeStage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, with a spectrum of anatomic extent, health status, and treatment approaches. Receipt of treatment and its intent should be independent of health system factors where care quality is optimal. We investigated the degree that modifiable health system factors are associated with receipt of treatment and treatment intent in stage III NSCLC in a large, universal health system. MethodsThis was a population-based, retrospective cohort study with health administrative data from Ontario, Canada, 2010–2018 for those aged ≥ 20 years, with AJCC 7 or 8 stage III NSCLC. We explored system factors associated with NSCLC treatment: region of residence, diagnostic interval, travel distance, advanced radiation (e.g. IMRT, VMAT) and systemic therapy treatment volumes and year of treatment. The relative risk (RR) of (1) any treatment versus no treatment, and (2) palliative versus non-palliative treatment was determined, using multivariable stepwise Poisson regression models. We adjusted for patient, disease and treatment factors. ResultsWe identified 7,093 people with stage III NSCLC between 2010 and 2018. There were no system factors associated with receipt of treatment versus no treatment in adjusted analysis. The major system factor associated with palliative intent was region of residence (RR: Region ranges from 0.88 to 1.67, p < 0.001). Stratifying by era (2010–2012 vs. 2013–2015 vs. 2016–2018), there was an increase in receipt of curative treatment and use of advanced radiotherapy techniques and immunotherapy over time, but regional variation of treatment intent was similar. ConclusionsRegion of residence emerged as the major health system factor associated with treatment intent for stage III NSCLC. This variation remained, even as advances in radiotherapy and systemic therapy were adopted. Our study suggests possible opportunities to improve care outcomes by addressing unexplained regional variation in care.

Brazil’s Unified Health System: the fight for a universal right in an unequal country

This article analyzes Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS), established by the 1988 Constitution. The article initially presents the previous trajectory of national health policy and the context of democratization in the 1980s, which favored health reform and created a public, universal, and comprehensive health system. It then explores the advances and contradictions recorded in more than three decades of implementation of the SUS. The main advances observed were the creation of institutional mechanisms compatible with the federative arrangement and social participation, political and administrative decentralization, the national expansion of access to health, changes in the health care model, including strengthening primary care, and improvements in health indicators. On the other hand, the persistence of structural problems and disputes between different health agendas, with differences between governments, led to contradictions in financing and public-private relations in health. Despite the differences between countries, the analysis of the Brazilian case provides lessons on the challenges in building universal health systems in Latin America.

Experiences of central child health services teams regarding a special governmental investment in child health services

BackgroundHistorically marked by a high infant mortality rate, Sweden’s healthcare reforms have successively led to a robust, decentralized universal child health system covering over 97% of the population 0–5 years. However, inequities in health have become an increasing problem and the public health law explicitly states that health inequities should be reduced, resulting in various government initiatives. This study examines the experiences of Central Child Health Services (CCHS) teams during the implementation of the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement between the State and the regions starting in 2017. The agreement aimed to enhance child health service accessibility, especially in socio-economically disadvantaged areas, but broadly stated guidelines and the short-term nature of funding have raised questions about its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to understand the experiences of CCHC teams in implementing the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement, focusing on investment decisions, implementation efforts, as well as facilitators and barriers to using the funds effectively.MethodsCCHC teams were purposefully sampled and invited via email for interviews, with follow-ups for non-respondents. Conducted from January to October 2023, the interviews were held digitally and recorded with individuals familiar with the agreement’s implementation within these teams. Both authors analyzed the transcripts thematically, applying Braun and Clarke’s framework. Participants represented a cross-section of Sweden’s varied healthcare regions.ResultsThree main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: “Easy come, easy go,” highlighting funding uncertainties; “What are we supposed to do?” expressing dilemmas over project prioritization and partner collaboration; and “Building castles on sand,” focusing on the challenges of staff retention and foundational program stability. Respective subthemes addressed issues like fund allocation timing, strategic decision-making, and the practical difficulties of implementing extended home visiting programs, particularly in collaboration with social services.ConclusionsThis study uncovered the challenges faced in implementing the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement across different regions in Sweden. These obstacles underline the need for precise guidelines regarding the use of funds, stable financing for long-term project sustainability, and strong foundational support to ensure effective interprofessional collaboration and infrastructure development for equitable service delivery in child health services.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Telemedicine Optometric-Based Assessment for Screening Diabetic Retinopathy in a Country with a Universal Public Health System.

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a new telemedicine optometric-based screening program of diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared with traditional models' assessments in a universal European public health system. Methods: A new teleophthalmology program for DR based on the assessment of retinographies (3-field Joslin Vision Network by a certified optometrist and a reading center [IOBA-RC]) was designed. This program was first conducted in a rural area 40 km from the referral hospital (Medina de Rioseco, Valladolid, Spain). The cost-effectiveness was compared with telemedicine based on evaluations by primary care physicians and general ophthalmologists, and to face-to-face examinations conducted by ophthalmologists. A decision tree model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of both models, considering public and private costs. The effectiveness was measured in terms of quality of life. Results: A total of 261 patients with type 2 diabetes were included (42 had significant DR and required specific surveillance by the RC; 219 were undiagnosed). The sensitivity and specificity of the detection of DR were 100% and 74.1%, respectively. The telemedicine-based DR optometric screening model demonstrated similar utility to models based on physicians and general ophthalmologists and traditional face-to-face evaluations (0.845) at a lower cost/patient (€51.23, €71.65, and €86.46, respectively). Conclusions: The telemedicine-based optometric screening program for DR in a RC demonstrated cost savings even in a developed country with a universal health care system. These results support the expansion of this kind of teleophthalmology program not only for screening but also for the follow-up of diabetic patients.

Adaptation of Physical Environment in Health Care Institutions for People with Disabilities Caused by Musculoskeletal System and Connective Tissue Disease

The UN World Health Organization has set a goal to ensure people-oriented universal, equal, sustainable and high quality health systems which would give priority to prevention of diseases, continuous perfection of quality, integrated provision of services, assurance of continuous care, development of patients’ self-care, relocation of care close to home by 2020. People with disabilities and their opportunities to equally participate in the health system like other citizens occurred in the high focus because over recent decades various international documents acknowledge that, despite various measures and obligations, people with disabilities face violations of their rights in various spheres of living worldwide. The paper presents the research that aimed at investigating the adaptation of physical environment in health care institutions focused on people with disabilities caused by the disease of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. The research suggests that people with disabilities caused by the disease of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue face a greater burden, and the disability has become an obstacle to their enjoyment of human rights and freedoms in the health system. This testifies to the fact that the Lithuanian state does not guarantee this part of its citizens the same quality of health services as other citizens, as provided for in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006).

Immigrant and Racialized Populations' Cumulative Exposure to Discrimination and Associations with Long-Term Conditions During COVID-19: A Nationwide Large-Scale Study in Canada.

This cross-sectional study examines associations between the race-migration nexus, cumulative exposure to intersectional discrimination (2years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic), and long-term conditions. A nationwide self-selected sample (n = 32,605) was obtained from a Statistics Canada's Crowdsourcing online survey from August 4 to 24, 2020. Binary and multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine disparities by the race-migration nexus in accumulative experiences of multiple situations- and identity-based discrimination and their relations with long-term conditions, after controlling for sociodemographic covariates. During the pandemic, discrimination stemming from racialization - such as race/skin color (24.4% vs 20.1%) and ethnicity/culture (18.5% vs 16.5%) - and cyberspace (34.1% vs 29.8%) exaggerated relative to pre-pandemic period; compared to Canadian-born (CB) whites, the likelihood of experiencing multiple discrimination increased alongside the domains of discrimination being additively intersected (e.g., identity-based, all p's < 0.001) among CB racialized minorities (ORs 2.08 to 11.78), foreign-born (FB) racialized minorities (ORs 1.99 to 12.72), and Indigenous populations (ORs 1.62 to 8.17), except for FB whites (p > 0.01); dose-response relationships were found between cumulative exposure to multiple discrimination and odds of reporting long-term conditions (p's < 0.001), including seeing (ORs 1.63 to 2.99), hearing (ORs 1.83 to 4.45), physical (ORs 1.66 to 3.87), cognitive (ORs 1.81 to 3.79), and mental health-related impairments (ORs 1.82 to 3.41). Despite a universal health system, Canadians who are CB/FB racialized and Indigenous populations, have a higher prevalence of cumulative exposure to different aspects of discrimination that are associated with multiple long-term conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Equity-driven solutions are needed to tackle upstream determinants of health inequalities through uprooting intersectional discrimination faced by racialized and immigrant communities.

Comparative Analysis of Health Outcomes Between Migrants and Native Spaniards

In 2012, Spain enacted a law which changed its Universal Health System from ensuring government funded healthcare for all residents, regardless of immigration status, to restricting migrant healthcare access. This study investigates health records from 2017, one year before this restrictive legislation was repealed, to determine if such legislative action coincides with disparities in health outcomes between migrants to Spain and native Spaniards. Because a health record analysis from 2012 suggests that migrants in Spain exhibited poorer overall health even before the legislative restrictions, we hypothesized that migrant communities would continue to demonstrate lower health outcomes than native Spaniards while these restrictions were enforced. We extracted nationality and health data from the Spanish Ministry of Health’s 2017 National Health Survey. We grouped thirteen health sub-indicators into four main health indicators to compare the general physical and mental well-being of migrants and native Spaniards. These main indicators included disease prevalence, risk factors for future infirmities, mental health, and self-perceived health. After quantifying interviewees’ responses, we compared population means of migrants and natives for each sub-indicator through an unpaired t-test of means to determine trend significance. We integrated the results of sub-indicator comparisons to determine overall trends in the four main indicators. With only one exception, all eight sub-indicators for disease prevalence demonstrated decreased prevalence among migrant populations which indicates lower overall disease for migrants compared to native Spaniards. This trend continued for self-perceived health as well as all sub- indicators used to assess mental health and predisposition to future illnesses. These results suggest that migrants in Spain are healthier than their native counterparts. The better health outcomes experienced by the migrants relative to native Spaniards contradict our hypothesis. Nevertheless, previous findings explain these results as demonstrative of an established phenomenon, the “healthy migrant effect,” in which migrants typically demonstrate higher healthcare outcomes than their native counterparts. The observed “healthy migrant effect” despite legislative restrictions on migrant healthcare access, as well as the effect’s apparent disappearance during the aftermath of Spain’s 2008 economic recession, suggests that the health disparities between migrants and natives correlated more directly with a nation’s economic well-being than their legislative actions.

The history of inequality: the deep-acting ideological and institutional influences

Abstract After reviewing evidence on long-run national trends in inequality since the 1320s and the history of ideas and measures of inequality, the focus is on the history of institutions which have influenced the trends in inequality. Here, the major surprise for many will be to learn that a progressively funded universal social security, health and welfare system was instituted by Elizabeth I in 1601. The welfare state was not invented but restored by the Labour government of 1945–51, decreasing inequalities substantially. In 1834, the parliament had reduced the Elizabethan Poor Law to a deterrent workhouse system, its funding halved in accord with the ideas of Bentham, Malthus and economic liberalism. Since 1979, the successor ideology of neo-liberalism has again increased inequality by reducing the progressivity of taxes and restraining expenditure on public services. After 1979, child poverty more than doubled to over 30% and has never returned to previous lower levels.

Filipino Immigrants in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain: Health and Access to Services.

The Philippines is a source of labor for many countries. Roughly 10 million overseas Filipinos are working and living outside of the Philippines. This paper examines the association between sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, educational level, and income) and self-rated physical and mental health, access to healthcare, and health habits among immigrant Filipinos living in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. Through convenience sampling, Filipino migrants (n = 103) aged 18 years and above participated in the online survey between October 2022 and March 2023. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis and chi-square. Almost all respondents self-rated their health as excellent and very good. Female respondents are more affected by mental health. Most are enrolled in the Universal Health System of Spain (public insurance). There is more utilization of private health insurance among respondents aged 60 years and above and high-wage earners. Cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking are associated with males. More than half of the respondents perform weekly exercise occasionally or never. These findings suggest a potential need for targeted interventions with an emphasis on the practice of preventive health and the promotion of healthy lifestyles, especially among financially disadvantaged migrants with lesser health access.

The paradox of growing technical capacities with low global governance: a review of Voluntary National Reviews’ SDG health-related indicators

BackgroundThis study delves into the States’ accountability for health-related Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators from 2016 to 2020. An analysis of Voluntary National Reviews (VNR) is employed as an instrument to scrutinize the alignment of States’ indicators with the global indicator framework, shedding light on global health governance within the context of the 2030 Agenda and States’ strategic prioritization. A curation of 60 health-related indicators from 195 VNRs, produced during the aforementioned period, is organized into thematic groups.ResultsOur results highlight a concerning discrepancy in the reporting frequency of various health-related themes. The findings reveal a paradoxical coexistence characterized by the concurrent strengthening and diminution of the global health governance articulated in the Agenda’s global health governance. This manifests in the increased utilization and consistency of health-related indicators over the study years, coupled with an emphasis on infectious diseases and child and maternal health indicators. Conversely, a discernible governance decline is evidenced by the inadequate representation of health-related indicators in VNRs, notably within the domains of universal health coverage and health system indicators. Furthermore, High-Income States exhibit diminished accountability.ConclusionsThe VNRs unveil a paradox wherein burgeoning technical capacity coexists with governance deficits, a phenomenon attributable to both statistical capabilities and political preferences. The prevalent use of proxy indicators in VNRs oversimplifies the presentation of official indicators, thereby compromising the aspirational goal of pioneering statistical innovations for measuring intricate issues in the SDGs. In light of our conceptualization of the 2030 Agenda’s global health as a regime complex governance, we advocate for comprehensive investigations into each health regime cluster. This approach aims to unravel disputes, discern patterns, and elucidate States’ preferences concerning specific thematic areas. Functioning as an accountability mechanism for the Agenda’s governance, VNRs underscore States’ adaptability and short-term learning capabilities, offering valuable insights for identifying harmful goal prioritization. The discretionary nature of indicator selection by States in the VNRs, enabled by the Agenda’s proposition of a contextual adaptation of the SDGs and a blind eye to the guideline’s request to review all SDG indicators, highlights a critical flaw in the VNR as an accountability mechanism.

Strategic Alliances in Global Health: Innovative Perspectives in the Era of Sustainable Development.

This article discusses current challenges in the field of global health and the World Health Organization's (WHO) strategies to address them. It highlights the importance of measuring the health impacts of global recession and globalization and the need for human-centered approaches to sustainable development. Emphasis is placed on commitment to health equity and the use of strategic partnerships for health at global, national, and local levels. Improving the health and well-being of populations, as well as public health equity, are core principles of the 2030 Agenda for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These principles are expressed in SDG 3, which promotes universal access to health services and systems and recognizes global health as a basic human right. It highlights the importance of strategic partnerships to combat emerging health crises, improve public health indices, and address the burden of chronic disease. These partnerships are contemplated in SDG 17 and are manifested in different modalities, such as network governance, cross-sector collaboration, public-private partnership, and social participation. This diversity of alliances has played an important role in scaling up and strengthening universal health systems around the world, including in Latin America and the Caribbean. The text concludes by presenting the essential characteristics of these inter-organizational and inter-institutional alliances in the field of global health.

Universal health coverage and equal access in Sweden: a century-long perspective on macro-level policy

BackgroundWhen today’s efforts to achieve universal health coverage are mainly directed towards low-income settings, it is perhaps easy to forget that countries considered to have universal, comprehensive and high-performing health systems have also undergone this journey. In this article, the aim is to provide a century-long perspective to illustrate Sweden’s long and ongoing journey towards universal health coverage and equal access to healthcare.MethodsThe focus is on macro-level policy. A document analysis is divided into three broad eras (1919–1955; 1955–1989; 1989–) and synthesises seven points in time when policies relevant to overarching goals and regulation of universal health coverage and equal access were proposed and/or implemented. The development is analysed and concluded in relation to two egalitarian goals in the context of health: equality of access and equal treatment for equal need.ResultsOver the past century, macro-level policy evolved from the concept of creating access for the neediest and those reliant on wages for their survival to a mandatory insurance with equal right to healthcare for all. However, universal health coverage was not achieved until 1955, and individuals had to rely on their personal financial resources to cover the cost at the time of care utilization until the 1970s. It was not until 1983 that legislation explicitly stated that access to healthcare should be equal for the entire population (horizontal equity), while a vertical equity-principle was not added until 1997. Subsequently, ideas of free choice and privatization have gained significance. For instance, they aim to increase service access, addressing the Swedish health system’s Achilles’ heel in this regard. However, the principle of equal access for all is now being challenged by the emergence of private health insurance, which offers quicker access to services.Conclusions: brief summary and potential implicationsIt can be concluded that there is no perpetual Swedish healthcare model and various dimensions of access have been the focus of policy discussion. The discussion on access barriers has shifted from financial to personal and organizational ones. Today, Sweden still ranks high in terms of affordability and equity in international comparisons: although not as well as a decade ago. Whether this marks the beginning of a new trend intertwined with a decline in Sweden’s welfare ‘exceptionalism’, or is a temporary decline remains to be assessed in the future.