Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Research Articles

Letter to editor: Is it Uniportal-VATS feasible in pericardial cyst treatment? Comment on: “A case series: Uniportal VATS excision of pericardial cyst in symptomatic patients”

Letter to editor: Is it Uniportal-VATS feasible in pericardial cyst treatment? Comment on: “A case series: Uniportal VATS excision of pericardial cyst in symptomatic patients”

Our surgical technique for primary spontaneous pneumothorax via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (incision size: 1.8 cm).

Our surgical technique for primary spontaneous pneumothorax via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (incision size: 1.8 cm).

Stapler-induced vascular injury during uniportal VATS lobectomy: lessons learned from a rare complication case

BackgroundDue to advances in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the majority of lung resections can be performed safely via VATS with low morbidity and mortality. However, pulmonary artery (PA) bleeding often requires emergency conversion to thoracotomy, potentially leading to a life-threatening situation. We report a case of pulmonary artery injury caused by an unexpected stapler-tissue interaction during uniportal VATS lobectomy, highlighting the importance of recognizing and managing such rare complications to improve patient outcomes.Case presentationA 63-year-old man underwent uniportal VATS left upper lobectomy for a suspected primary lung cancer. During the procedure, unexpected bleeding occurred from the third branch of the pulmonary artery (A3) after withdrawal of an unfired stapler. The protruding staple of the A3 stump was inadvertently hooked and stretched by the groove of the staple anvil. Although the bleeding was controlled by compression with the lung, the injured A3 stump required repair. Due to the extensive intimal injury near the central part of the left main pulmonary artery and the potential risk of fatal postoperative complications, we converted to open thoracotomy for definitive vascular repair by suturing. The patient had no postoperative complications and was discharged on postoperative day 8.ConclusionsThis case report provides valuable lessons regarding the rare stapler-related vascular injury during uniportal VATS lobectomy. It is important to note that even during non-vascular dissection, unexpected stapler-tissue interactions can lead to bleeding. To prevent the vessel stump entanglement with stapler components, maintaining separation between the stapler and staple stumps is crucial. In uniportal VATS, manipulation during stapler insertion is one of the most challenging phases for instrument interference, requiring increased caution to prevent complications such as the vascular injury described in this case. Thorough preoperative planning, specific intraoperative precautions, and adapted safety protocols that address the limitations of uniportal VATS are essential for effective management of potential complications. Although techniques for thoracoscopic vascular control exist, they are not always feasible and conversion to open thoracotomy should be considered when necessary to ensure patient safety.

Mini-Invasive Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Which Is the Surgeon's Best Approach for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery?

Objectives: The choice of the best Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) surgical approach is still debated. Surgeons are often faced with the choice between innovation and self-confidence. The present study reports the experience of a high-volume single institute, comparing data of uni-portal, bi-portal and tri-portal VATS, to find out the safest and most effective mini-invasive approach, leading surgeon's choice. Methods: Between 2015 and 2022, a total of 210 matched patients underwent VATS lobectomy for early-stage cancer, using uni-portal (fifth intercostal space), bi-portal (seventh space for optic and the fifth), and tri-portal (seventh and the fifth/four) access. Patients were matched for age, BPCO, smoke, comorbidities, lesions (size and staging) to obtain three homogenous groups (A: uni-portal; B: bi-portal; C: tri-portal). The surgeons had comparable expertise. Data were retrospectively collected from institutional database and analyzed. Results: No differences were detected considering time of surgery, length of hospital stay, complications, conversion rate, specific survival, and days of chest tube length of stay. Better results on chest tube removal were described in group A (mean 1.1 days) compared to B (mean 2.6 days) and C (mean 4.7 days); nevertheless, they not statistically significant (p = 0.106). Conclusions: No significant differences among the groups were described, except for the reduction in chest tube permanence in group A. This allows to hypothesize an enhanced recovery after surgery in this group but the different approaches in this series seem to guarantee comparable safety and effectiveness. Considering no superiority of one method above the others, the best suggested approach should be the one for which the surgeon feels more confident.

Decortication with uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for empyema due to postoperative esophageal leakage: a report of two pediatric cases

BackgroundVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered useful for the treatment of parapneumonic empyema in children. However, thoracoscopic management of empyema due to esophageal leakage as an operative complication has not been well described in the literature.Case presentationWe successfully decorticated severe empyema using uniport VATS in 2 children (a 2-year-old boy who suffered esophageal perforation after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery, and a 7-month-old girl who had anastomotic leakage after thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia). In these patients, we noticed that pleural effusion rapidly progressed to empyema and caused respiratory insufficiency due to wide-range coverage by fibrotic pleural rind that was successfully decorticated under video-assisted vision from a mini-thoracotomy, followed by spontaneous healing of the leakage.ConclusionsWe did not attempt to closely approach or try to repair the esophageal leakage. We believe that this is an important tip for these situations.

A retrospective analysis of simultaneous bilateral uniportal thoracoscopic surgeries for multiple primary bilateral pulmonary nodules

BackgroundThere are no standard treatment options for bilateral multiple pulmonary nodules requiring resection. This study aimed to summarize the experience of simultaneous bilateral uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of bilateral multiple primary pulmonary nodules.MethodsThe clinical data of 65 cases of simultaneous bilateral uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral multiple primary pulmonary nodules treated were retrospectively analyzed. These cases were treated within The Ninth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital between January 2018 and November 2020. Parameters related to the surgery, perioperative aspects, surgical techniques, pathology results, and postoperative complications were examined.ResultsAll surgeries were conducted through uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, with no instances of intraoperative conversion to thoracotomy. Fifty-three patients further underwent CT-guided Hookwire localization for the localization of pulmonary nodules. A total of 189 nodules were resected using multiple surgical procedures, with a malignancy rate of 86.2%. The average operation time was 226 ± 77.4 min, the average thoracic drainage duration was 3.1 ± 1.5 days, the average 24 h pleural drainage was 385.9 ± 157.4 mL, the average postoperative hospital stay was 8.6 ± 2.4 days, and the average blood loss was 77.2 ± 33.8 mL. Post-surgery, all patients were transferred to the ward safely within 12 h. 15.38% of patients have prolonged drainage time, and 12.31% of patients experience complications such as lung infection, arrhythmia, and venous thrombosis.ConclusionThe selected cases undergoing simultaneous bilateral uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the management of bilateral multiple primary pulmonary nodules demonstrated favorable outcomes. Our observations indicate the safety and feasibility of this procedure, providing an individualized and precise treatment approach for affected patients.

Evaluation of the safety of drainless uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a two-institution retrospective study

Evaluation of the safety of drainless uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a two-institution retrospective study

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Thoracic Surgery Requiring One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Intraoperative fluid management based on pulse pressure variation has shown potential to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve clinical outcomes in various surgical settings. However, its efficacy and safety have not been assessed in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. Methods: Patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery approach were randomly assigned to two groups. In the PPV group, fluid administration was guided by the pulse pressure variation parameter, while in the near-zero group, it was guided by conventional hemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome was the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio 15 min after extubation. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the first three postoperative days, and the length of hospital stay. Results: The PaO2/FiO2 ratio did not differ between the two groups (364.48 ± 38.06 vs. 359.21 ± 36.95; p = 0.51), although patients in the PPV group (n = 44) received a larger amount of both crystalloids (1145 ± 470.21 vs. 890 ± 459.31, p = 0.01) and colloids (162.5 ± 278.31 vs 18.18 ± 94.68, p = 0.002) compared to the near-zero group (n = 44). No differences were found in extubation time, type and number of PPCs, and length of hospital stay. Conclusions: PPV-guided fluid management in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation does not improve pulmonary gas exchange as measured by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and does not seem to offer clinical benefits. Additionally, it results in increased fluid administration compared to fluid management based on conventional hemodynamic parameters.

Uniportal Laser-Assisted Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy (U-LA-VATS) for Lung Metastasectomy: Technical Description, Peri-Operative Results and Pertinent Literature Review.

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is a well-established treatment that is able to contribute to the cure of oligometastatic cancer. Surgery should adopt the most lung-sparing approach possible to preserve pulmonary function (and, consequently, the quality of life) and to spare the lung for potential additional lung resections. In this framework, laser technology has been introduced in recent decades, but only few experiences combining laser technology with VATS approaches have been reported till now. The main focus of this manuscript is to report our institutional experience in performing lung-sparing laser-assisted PM by uniportal VATS (uniportal laser-assisted VATS: U-LA-VATS). The surgical technique and peri-operative results from our series of patients were herein presented and compared with the pertinent literature. Methods: Between March 2021 and November 2023, among 98 patients who underwent PM, a total of 24 patients (18 men (75%); 6 women (25%); mean age 61.4 years; age range 13-83 years) were treated with laser-assisted PM at our institution. Patients who underwent anatomical resection were excluded for the purpose of the analysis. The U-LA-VATS procedure adopted a modified laser-assisted lung resection technique for performing PM via VATS. Dedicated instruments are used, characterized by a long shape and a curved shape, with distal and proximal articulations. A surgical laser system (Thulium + Diodo OUTPUT 30-10 W, Quanta System S.p.a., Solbiate Olona, Italy) was used, and a 550-μm sterile optical fibre conducted through a specific thoracoscopic handpiece was introduced in the lowest part of the incision. Peri-operative results were analysed in all cohort and compared according to the surgical technique. Moreover, these results were compared with those reported in the literature. Comprehensive research of the literature was conducted on PubMed from 2000 to 2024. A review was performed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: In 12 cases (50%), thulium laser-assisted resection was performed using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), and in the other cases (12, 50%), a (mini)thoracotomy access was adopted. In the thoracotomy group, the mean duration of surgery was 95 ± 57.7 min; meanwhile, it was 73.5 ± 35.5 in the uniportal VATS group. At the univariate analysis, this difference resulted to be statistically significant (p value 0.025). We did not observe intra-operative complications or remarkable malfunction of the laser system. We also did not report major complications after surgery; also the air-leak rate was 8.3% and 0% after thoracotomic and VATS procedures, respectively. Surgical margins were free from disease in all cases. Major and minor post-op complication rates were similar in both groups. The mean hospitalization after surgery was 2.9 ± 0.3 days for the uniportal VATS group and 3.7 ± 0.9 days for the thoracotomy group, this difference being statistically significant at the univariate analysis (p value = 0.015). Conclusions: U-LA-VATS is a safe and effective procedure, able to combine a parenchymal sparing exeresis with a mini-invasive approach. This procedure is associated with a shorter hospital stay compared with PM performed by a thoracotomic approach. Compared with the selected works for the review, our series is the only one describing the use of laser resection combined with a uniportal VATS approach.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of different suction pressure for speeding non-ventilated lung collapse in uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial

BackgroundThe bronchial suction has been applied in speeding lung collapse. Low suction pressure may not speed lung collapse, but high pressure causes occult lung injury. The aim of the study was to explore efficacy and safety of different suction pressure for speeding lung collapse.MethodsEighty-four subjects undergoing uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were randomly assigned for non-suction (Group 0), -10 cmH2O suction pressure (Group − 10), and − 30 cmH2O suction pressure (Group − 30). The primary outcome were the lung collapse scores (LCS) at 0 min (T0) after the visualization of the lung using a 10-point visual analogue scale and area under the curve (AUC) of LCS over time. The secondary outcomes included disconnection from the ventilator, the assessment of occult lung injury using NOS-3 expression, histologic scores of lung injury, and lung W/D weight ratio, intraoperative hypoxemia, the incidence of perioperative pulmonary complications.ResultsBoth the LCS at T0 and AUC analysis showed that compared with Group 0, Group − 10 and Group − 30 significantly achieved good lung collapse (P < 0.05), but no difference between Group − 10 and Group − 30. Four patients in Group 0 were treated with disconnection maneuver. The assessment of occult lung injury showed no differences.ConclusionsApplying − 10 cmH2O suction pressure for 1 min when pleural incision is a relatively safe method to promote lung collapse without the occurrence of occult lung injury.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2200062991. Registered on 26/08/2022.

251. THE COMPARISON OF UNIPORTAL VERSUS MULTIPORTAL VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A PROPENSITY-WEIGHTED ANALYSIS

Abstract Background Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been widely used, however, there are few studies on uniportal VATS for esophagectomy. Methods Data from patients with clinical stage T1–3/N0/M0 thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent surgery between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to assess the outcomes. Results Overall, 55 patients who underwent uniportal, and 212 patients who underwent multiportal, VATS were identified. Surgery-related postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1–2) occurred less frequently after uniportal than multiportal VATS in both crude and IPTW models (10.1% versus 28.8%, respectively; P = 0.018). The median postoperative length of stay was 9 (9–10) days in the uniportal VATS and 10 (9–14) days in the multiportal VATS group (P = 0.006 after IPTW). Upon IPTW analysis, in uniportal and multiportal VATS groups, the rates of pneumonia (grades 1-2) were 7.3% and 23.2% (P = 0.037). The visual analog scale (VAS) was administered on postoperative first 7 days and were significantly lower in the uniportal VATS group (P &amp;lt; 0.001). No surgical mortality was observed in the uniportal VATS group, and the survival benefit between the two groups was comparable before (P = 0.320) and after IPTW (P = 0.824). Conclusion Uniportal VATS for esophagectomy resulted in a lower rate of postoperative complications with less postoperative pain, and is practical for treating patients with esophageal cancer.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Minor Procedures.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) is becoming popular for major lung resections, even for more complex procedures. The technique initially described for minor procedures seems more difficult to reproduce and has a longer learning curve. This review aims to describe the evolution from multiportal to uVATS and to explore its feasibility and reproducibility by identifying its drawbacks and limitations. Research from PubMed was obtained with the terms [uniportal] AND [surgery] OR [single-port] AND [thoracic surgery] OR [VATS]. Papers concerning pediatric cases and non-English papers were excluded. Individual case reports were also excluded. uVATS seems to be widely adopted and performed for minor procedures. The applicability of uVATS for different indications is discussed, even though practically all thoracic surgical interventions can be performed through a single incision. The transition from conventional three-port VATS to uVATS is described in this paper. An increasing number of thoracic surgeons worldwide have adopted this approach, even for major complex anatomical lung resections. Regarding the performance of minor thoracic interventions, we believe this technique is easily reproducible with a short learning curve because the instruments do not cross each other, and intraoperative movements remain intuitive. It is therefore a feasible, safe, and efficacious technique. For these reasons, we believe uVATS should be offered to all patients undergoing minor thoracoscopic procedures.

Periareolar approach in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for right middle lobectomy: a novel technique

BackgroundUniportal thoracoscopic right middle lobectomy (RML) poses greater technical challenges than other lobectomies. Although two-port thoracoscopy offers convenience, it results in heightened surgical trauma and scarring. The periareolar incision is rarely used in lobectomy while known for its cosmetic advantages. This study presents the periareolar access (combining a periareolar port and a 1-cm port) for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in RML, comparing it with the traditional uniportal technique in both male and female patients.MethodsEighty patients who underwent RML were randomly divided into two groups: the periareolar VATS (PV) approach (n = 40) and the uniportal VATS (UV) approach (n = 40) from August 2020 to February 2023. All patients were followed up for 1 year and clinical data were collected and analyzed.ResultsNo significant differences in complications, blood loss, duration of chest tube placement, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between two methods. However, the PV group exhibited significantly shorter operative time, reduced postoperative visible scarring and lower visual analogue scores (VAS) for postoperative pain (P < 0.05). Additionally, the PV group demonstrated significantly higher cosmetic and satisfaction scores at the 6-month postoperative assessment (P < 0.05). Notably, breast ultrasound follow-up revealed two cases injuries of the mammary glands in female patients, and sensory function of most nipple and areola remained intact except two cases in all PV group patients.ConclusionsPeriareolar VATS emerges as a promising alternative approach for RML, providing clear benefits in pain management and cosmetic outcomes, while maintaining safety and convenience.Graphical

Non-palpable Pulmonary Nodules and Uniportal-VATS: Radio-guided Localization (ROLL) Experience of a Lung Multidisciplinary Team.

Surgical resection with a minimally invasive approach is the standard for diagnosing and treating solitary pulmonary nodules. A computed tomography (CT)-guided technetium99m-macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) injection-based procedure has been employed for small and non-palpable lung nodule radio-guided preoperative localization (ROLL). This procedure is usually followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study retrospectively evaluated the feasibility, clinicopathologic outcomes, and complications of this localization radio-guided procedure followed by uniportal VATS. This retrospective study included 63 patients with suspicious lung nodules who underwent 99mTc-MAA CT-guided localization before uniportal VATS. The analysis examined the imaging and procedure characteristics, procedural risks, successful intra-operative localization, wedge resection, conversion from VATS to open thoracotomy, the reason, and histological diagnosis for each nodule. Also, it was evaluated how nodule and procedure features affected successful intra-operative localization. All patients were diagnosed using a CT scan, and 90.4% had a PET scan at basal staging. A round-glass morphology was present in 9.6% of cases, whereas most had a solid appearance. The mean nodule size was 9.78 mm (maximal tumoral diameter) with a 1-23 mm range. The mean distance from the pleural surface was 15.6 mm (range=1-117 mm). The detection rate of the 99mTc-MAA CT-guided localization procedure was 100%. Surgical procedures were uniportal VATS and transpleural thoracoscopy in 52 (82.5%) and 11 (17.5%) patients, respectively. The intraoperative localization rate was 98.4%. Pneumothorax represented the most frequent complication (6.3%), with one case clinically significant and three only with minimal radiological evidence. Pathology confirmed radical excision in all cases. Lung nodule localization with CT-guided 99mTc-MAA followed by uniportal VATS is feasible with a high success rate and low complication rate.

Safety and efficacy of surgically performed continuous superficial serratus anterior plane block in uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery.

The 'surgically performed' continuous superficial serratus anterior plane block (continuous s-SAPB) was never described before in uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (uniportal VATS) surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the technique. Between March 2022 and April 2023, 50 patients, undergone uniportal VATS surgery at our thoracic surgery department, were scheduled for a surgically performed continuous s-SAPB as post-operative analgesia protocol. The mean execution time for the block was 3.92 ± 2.56 min. Ten patients (20%) required morphine for a visual analogue scale (VAS) score >4 immediately after surgery. The recorded VAS score at chest tube removal was 1.87 ± 1.41, whereas 2 h after the manoeuvre was 0.42 ± 0.72. No complication related to block insertion was recorded. The onset of chronic pain was observed in a total of 2 patients (4%). The surgically performed continuous s-SAPB in uniportal VATS seems to be safe and easy to perform, and it provides a satisfactory analgesic effect.

Application of drainage strategy with bi-pigtail catheters in patients undergoing lobectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery.

There are no standard guidelines regarding the number and size of chest tubes that should be selected after thoracic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of adopting a drainage strategy with bi-pigtail catheters (BPCs) on patients undergoing lobectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). A retrospective study was performed of patients undergoing uniportal lobectomy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology between August 2021 and August 2022. The patients were divided into the following two groups according to the drainage strategy adopted: (I) a traditional chest tube (TCT) group; and (II) a BPC group. The outcomes measured included postoperative complications, as measured by the Clavien-Dindo method, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores of the patients after surgery. In total, 868 patients underwent lung resection during the study period, after exclusion, the data of 470 patients who underwent uniport lobectomy were reviewed (235 in the TCT group, and 235 in the BPC group). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline data (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications (7.7% vs. 19.1%) and postoperative VAS pain scores at 7-24 hours (3.3±1.0 vs. 3.7±1.5) and 25-48 hours (3.1±0.8 vs. 3.6±1.5) were significantly lower in the BPC group than the TCT group (all P<0.001). Additionally, the postoperative length of stay (4.6±1.5 vs. 5.4±4.5 days) and the collapse rate of the residual lung (19.2%±9.1% vs. 20.9%±9.6%) of the BPC group were better than those of the TCT group (P<0.05). The results of univariable and multivariable analyses showed that a drainage strategy with a TCT was an independent risk factor for decreased postoperative complications, and reduced moderate or severe pain scores at 7-24 and 25-48 hours after surgery. Our drainage strategy with BPCs decreased the incidence of postoperative complications and alleviated the postoperative pain of patients undergoing lobectomy by uniportal VATS and is safe and feasible.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomic Lung Resection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Case-Matched Analysis.

The advantages of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are well-recognized in several studies. However, in the cases of advanced lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), the role of VATS is still questionable, with concerns about safety, technical feasibility, and oncological completeness. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nCT on patients who had undergone uniportal VATS (U-VATS) anatomic lung resections for lung cancer, by comparing the short-term outcomes of patients after nCT with case-matched counterparts (treated by surgery alone). We performed a retrospective, comparative study enrolling 927 patients (nCT: 60; non-nCT:867) who underwent U-VATS anatomic lung resections from 2014 to 2020 in two centers. Data were collected in a shared database with standardized variables' definition. Propensity score matching using 15 baseline preoperative patients' characteristics was performed in order to minimize selection-confounding factors between the two groups, which then were directly compared in terms of perioperative outcomes. After propensity score matching, two groups of 60 patients had been defined. The nCT-group had a higher conversion rate compared to the control group (13.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.003) without an increase in operation time or cardiopulmonary complications. In addition, no differences between the two groups were recorded in terms of prolonged air leaks, length of stay, and readmission. U-VATS after nCT is a feasible approach, showing a similar rate of cardiopulmonary complications and length of stay when compared with the control group. However, it remains a challenging surgery due to its great technical complexity as well as the clinical status of the patients.

Safety of one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy

ObjectivesUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy (U-VATS-P) is feasible and safe from a perioperative standpoint. How to choose the proper chest tube and drainage method is important in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of one 8.5-Fr (1Fr = 0.333 mm) pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after U-VATS-P.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon’s experience with U-VATS-P for lung cancer from May 2016 to September 2022. Patients were managed with one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after U-VATS-P. The clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsIn total, 77 patients had one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter placed for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after U-VATS-P for lung cancer. The mean age was 60.9\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}7.39 (40–76) years; The mean FEV1 was 2.1\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}0.6 (l/s), and the mean FEV1% was 71.2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}22.7. The median operative time was 191.38\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}59.32 min; the mean operative hemorrhage was 109.46\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}96.56 ml; the mean duration of postoperative chest tube drainage was 6.80\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}2.33 days; the mean drainage volumes in the first three days after operation were 186.31\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}50.97, 321.97\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}52.03, and 216.44\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}35.67 ml, respectively; and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.90\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\pm$$\\end{document}2.58 days. No patient experienced complications resulting from chest tube malfunction. Ten patients experienced minor complications. One patient with nonlife-threatening empyema and bronchopleural fistula required short rehospitalization for anti-inflammatory therapy and reintubation. Three patients with chylothorax were treated with intravenous nutrition. Four patients had atrial fibrillation that was controlled by antiarrhythmic therapy. Two patients had more thoracic hemorrhagic exudation after the operation, which was found in time and was cured effectively, so they were discharged from the hospital uneventfully after early hemostatic therapy and nutritional support.ConclusionsAll patients in this study received early postoperative rehabilitation, and the rate of relevant complications was low. We therefore recommend a single 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage as an effective, safe and reliable drainage method for the management of U-VATS-P.

Safety and perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has recently become an alternative approach for many minimally invasive thoracic procedures, but although its surgical effectiveness has been proven, still its feasibility and safety are debated and unclear. the objective of this study was to compare the safety and perioperative outcomes of U-VATS versus multiportal VATS (M-VATS). This was a comparative follow-up randomised controlled clinical trial, carried out on 36 randomly selected eligible patients, and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria for VATS, they were assigned randomly into two groups: Study Group I including 18 patients undergoing U-VATS with conventional treatment using standard chest tube drainage and Control Group II including 18 patients undergoing M-VATS) with the same conventional treatment using standard chest tube drainage and served as a comparable control group. Patients in the U-VATS Group 1 had faster operation time, and with reduced blood loss, pleural drainage and post-operative hospitalisation, they also experienced lower average post-operative pain score on comparison with those in M-VATS Group II (P < 0.001), respectively. For either group, there were no hospital deaths or infections. There was no noticeable difference between the two groups in terms of the number of resected lymph nodes or the rates of intraoperative or post-operative complications (P > 0.05). U-VATS is feasible and safe in eligible selected patients with favourable short-term perioperative outcomes (operative time, duration of pleural drainage, post-operative pain, early ambulation, duration of hospital stay as well as the risk of perioperative complications), and it can be considered the preferred approach in minimally invasive thoracic procedures that open up for the possibility of fast-track thoracic surgeries.

Comparative clinical experience of subcostal VATS versus conventional uniportal lateral VATS approach.

The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach. All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed. The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30-83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46-89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group. Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.