Unilateral Transtibial Amputation Research Articles

Persons with Unilateral Transtibial Amputations Modulate Ipsilateral Hip and Contralateral Ankle Joint Work to Accelerate and Decelerate Walking

ABSTRACT Introduction Loss of power production at the ankle joint contributes to many problems people with unilateral transtibial (UTT) amputation experience during walking. Little is known about walking acceleration and deceleration, which is common in daily living and may require substantial compensatory behaviors from the residual lower-limb joints. Objective The aim of this study was to quantify individual lower-limb joint contributions to walking acceleration and deceleration in people with UTT amputations. We hypothesized that joint work on the prosthetic limb would be primarily modulated at the hip, and joint work on the sound limb would be primarily modulated at the ankle. Study Design The study is a repeated-measures design. Methods Six K3 level ambulators with UTT amputations participated. Participants performed a total of 40 walking trials while wearing their own nonarticulated dynamic prosthetic foot and socket. Each trial consisted of walking along a straight walkway. After walking approximately 2 m, participants received a cue instructing them to perform one of three walking conditions: continue walking at a constant average velocity, rapidly accelerate, or rapidly decelerate. We used ground reaction forces and motion capture data to derive joint kinematics and kinetics during the three walking conditions. We used one-way repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to identify significant differences between conditions. Results For the sound limb, positive hip and ankle work was significantly greater during acceleration compared with constant average velocity or deceleration conditions, and negative knee work was significantly greater during acceleration compared with deceleration. For the prosthetic limb, negative ankle work was significantly greater during acceleration compared with deceleration. Conclusions People with UTT amputation who use nonarticulated prostheses primarily modulated joint work on their sound limb to accelerate or decelerate walking speed. Clinical Relevance Characterizing compensatory behaviors of people with a UTT amputation is important for understanding injury mechanisms, informing clinical guidelines, and improving future ankle-foot prosthesis designs.

Variable-stiffness prosthesis improves biomechanics of walking across speeds compared to a passive device

Ankle push-off power plays an important role in healthy walking, contributing to center-of-mass acceleration, swing leg dynamics, and accounting for 45% of total leg power. The majority of existing passive energy storage and return prostheses for people with below-knee (transtibial) amputation are stiffer than the biological ankle, particularly at slower walking speeds. Additionally, passive devices provide insufficient levels of energy return and push-off power, negatively impacting biomechanics of gait. Here, we present a clinical study evaluating the kinematics and kinetics of walking with a microprocessor-controlled, variable-stiffness ankle-foot prosthesis (945 g) compared to a standard low-mass passive prosthesis (Ottobock Taleo, 463 g) with 7 study participants having unilateral transtibial amputation. By modulating prosthesis stiffness under computer control across walking speeds, we demonstrate that there exists a stiffness that increases prosthetic-side energy return, peak power, and center-of-mass push-off work, and decreases contralateral limb peak ground reaction force compared to the standard passive prosthesis across all evaluated walking speeds. We demonstrate a significant increase in center-of-mass push-off work of 26.1%, 26.2%, 29.6% and 29.9% at 0.75 m/s, 1.0 m/s, 1.25 m/s, and 1.5 m/s, respectively, and a significant decrease in contralateral limb ground reaction force of 3.1%, 3.9%, and 3.2% at 1.0 m/s, 1.25 m/s, and 1.5 m/s, respectively. This study demonstrates the potential for a quasi-passive microprocessor-controlled variable-stiffness prosthesis to increase push-off power and energy return during gait at a range of walking speeds compared to a passive device of a fixed stiffness.

Effects of prosthetic stiffness and added mass on metabolic power and asymmetry in female runners with a leg amputation.

Similar to nonamputees, female athletes with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) using running-specific leg prostheses (RSPs) may have worse running economy and higher rates of running-related injury than male athletes. Optimizing RSP configuration for female athletes could improve running economy and minimize biomechanical asymmetry, which has been associated with running-related injury. Nine females with a TTA ran at 2.5 m/s while we measured metabolic rates and ground reaction forces. Subjects used an RSP with a manufacturer-recommended stiffness category, one category less stiff and two categories less stiff than recommended. Use of an RSP two categories less stiff resulted in 3.0% lower net metabolic power (P = 0.04), 7.8% lower affected leg stiffness (P = 6.01 × 10-4), increased contact time asymmetry (P = 0.04), and decreased stance average vertical ground reaction force asymmetry (P = 0.04) compared with a recommended stiffness category RSP. Lower RSP stiffness (kN/m) values were associated with lower net metabolic power (P = 0.02), lower affected leg stiffness (P = 1.36 × 10-4), longer affected leg contact time (P = 1.46 × 10-4), and similar affected leg peak and stance-average vertical ground reaction force compared with higher RSP stiffness values. Subjects then used the RSP stiffness category that elicited the lowest net metabolic power with 100 g, 200 g, and 300 g added distally. We found no significant effects of added mass on net metabolic power, biomechanics, or asymmetry. These results suggest that female runners with a TTA could decrease metabolic power during running while minimizing biomechanical asymmetries, which have been associated with running-related injury, by using an RSP two categories less stiff than manufacturer recommended.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Females with unilateral transtibial amputation can improve running performance through reductions in net metabolic power by using a running-specific prosthesis (RSP) that is less stiff than manufacturer-recommended. Lower RSP stiffness values are associated with greater leg stiffness and contact time asymmetry, and lower stance-average vertical ground reaction force asymmetry. However, we found that adding mass to the RSP did not affect net metabolic power and stance-phase biomechanical asymmetries during running.

Greater than recommended stiffness and power setting of a stance-phase powered leg prosthesis can improve step-to-step transition work and effective foot length ratio during walking in people with transtibial amputation.

People with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) using a passive-elastic prosthesis exhibit lower positive affected leg trailing work (ALtrail Wpos) and a greater magnitude of negative unaffected leg leading work (ULlead Wneg) during walking than non-amputees, which may increase joint pain and osteoarthritis risk in the unaffected leg. People with TTA using a stance-phase powered prosthesis (e.g., BiOM, Ottobock, Duderstadt, Germany) walk with increased ALtrail Wpos and potentially decreased magnitude of ULlead Wneg compared to a passive-elastic prosthesis. The BiOM includes a passive-elastic prosthesis with a manufacturer-recommended stiffness category and can be tuned to different power settings, which may change ALtrail Wpos, ULlead Wneg, and the prosthesis effective foot length ratio (EFLR). Thirteen people with TTA walked using 16 different prosthetic stiffness category and power settings on a level treadmill at 0.75-1.75m/s. We constructed linear mixed effects models to determine the effects of stiffness category and power settings on ALtrail Wpos, ULlead Wneg, and EFLR and hypothesized that decreased stiffness and increased power would increase ALtrail Wpos, not change and decrease ULlead Wneg magnitude, and decrease and not change prosthesis EFLR, respectively. We found there was no significant effect of stiffness category on ALtrail Wpos but increased stiffness reduced ULlead Wneg magnitude, perhaps due to a 0.02 increase in prosthesis EFLR compared to the least stiff category. Furthermore, we found that use of the BiOM with 10% and 20% greater than recommended power increased ALtrail Wpos and decreased ULlead Wneg magnitude at 0.75-1.00m/s. However, prosthetic power setting depended on walking speed so that use of the BiOM increased ULlead Wneg magnitude at 1.50-1.75m/s compared to a passive-elastic prosthesis. Ultimately, our results suggest that at 0.75-1.00m/s, prosthetists should utilize the BiOM attached to a passive-elastic prosthesis with an increased stiffness category and power settings up to 20% greater than recommended based on biological ankle values. This prosthetic configuration can allow people with unilateral transtibial amputation to increase ALtrail Wpos and minimize ULlead Wneg magnitude, which could reduce joint pain and osteoarthritis risk in the unaffected leg and potentially lower the metabolic cost of walking.

Transtibial osseointegration following unilateral traumatic amputation: An observational study of patients with at least two years follow-up

ImportanceMost patients use a traditional socket prosthesis (TSP) to ambulate independently following transtibial amputation. However, these patients generally require prosthesis repairs more than twice annually and an entirely new prosthesis every two years. Furthermore, transtibial amputation patients have four times the skin ulceration rate of transfemoral patients, prompting more frequent prosthesis refitting and diminished use. Trans-Tibial osseointegration (TTOI) is a promising technique to address the limitations of TSP, but remains understudied with only four cohorts totaling 41 total procedures reported previously. Continued concerns regarding the risk of infection and questions as to functional capacity postoperatively have slowed adoption of TTOI worldwide. ObjectiveThis study reports the changes in mobility, quality of life (QOL), and the safety profile of the largest described cohort of patients with unilateral TTOI following traumatic amputation. DesignRetrospective observational cohort study. The cohort consisted of patients with data outcomes collected before and after osseointegration intervention. SettingA large, tertiary referral, major metropolitan center. ParticipantsTwenty-one skeletally mature adults who had failed socket prosthesis rehabilitation, with at least two years of post-osseointegration follow-up. Main outcomes and measuresMobility was evaluated by K-level, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). QOL was assessed by survey: daily prosthesis wear hours, prosthesis problem experience, general contentment with prosthesis, and Short Form 36 (SF36). Adverse events included any relevant unplanned surgery such as for infection, fracture, implant loosening, or implant failure. ResultsAll patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement post osseointegration surgery with respect to K-level, TUG, 6MWT, prosthesis wear hours, prosthesis problem experience, general prosthesis contentment score, and SF36 Physical Component Score (p < 0.01 for all). Three patients had four unplanned surgeries: two soft tissue refashionings, and one soft tissue debridement followed eventually by implant removal. No deaths, postoperative systemic complications, more proximal amputations, or periprosthetic fractures occurred. Conclusions and relevanceTTOI is likely to confer mobility and QOL improvements to patients dissatisfied with TSP rehabilitation following unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation. Adverse events are relatively infrequent and not further disabling. Judicious use of TTOI seems reasonable for properly selected patients. Level of evidence2 (Therapeutic investigation, Observational study with dramatic effect).

Comparison of Balance and Gait Pattern of Unilateral Transtibial Amputees Using Ranger and Dynamic Response Prosthetic Foot

Comparison of Balance and Gait Pattern of Unilateral Transtibial Amputees Using Ranger and Dynamic Response Prosthetic Foot

The biomechanical influence of transtibial Bone-Anchored limbs during walking

Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) using socket prostheses demonstrate asymmetric joint biomechanics during walking, which increases the risk of secondary comorbidities (e.g., low back pain (LBP), osteoarthritis (OA)). Bone-anchored limbs are an alternative to socket prostheses, yet it remains unknown how they influence multi-joint loading. Our objective was to determine the influence of bone-anchored limb use on multi-joint biomechanics during walking. Motion capture data (kinematics, ground reaction forces) were collected during overground walking from ten participants with unilateral TTA prior to (using socket prostheses) and 12-months after bone-anchored limb implantation. Within this year, each participant completed a rehabilitation protocol that guided progression of loading based on patient pain response and optimized biomechanics. Musculoskeletal models were developed at each testing timepoint (baseline or 12-months after implantation) and used to calculate joint kinematics, internal joint moments, and joint reaction forces (JRFs). Analyses were performed during three stance periods on each limb. The between-limb normalized symmetry index (NSI) was calculated for joint moments and JRF impulses. Discrete (range of motion (ROM), impulse NSI) dependent variables were compared before and after implantation using paired t-tests with Bonferroni-Holm corrections while continuous (ensemble averages of kinematics, moments, JRFs) were compared using statistical parametric mapping (p < 0.05). When using a bone-anchored limb, frontal plane pelvic (residual: pre = 9.6 ± 3.3°, post = 6.3 ± 2.5°, p = 0.004; intact: pre = 10.2 ± 3.9°, post = 7.9 ± 2.6°, p = 0.006) and lumbar (residual: pre = 15.9 ± 7.0°, post = 10.6 ± 2.5°, p = 0.024, intact: pre = 17.1 ± 7.0°, post = 11.4 ± 2.8°, p = 0.014) ROM was reduced compared to socket prosthesis use. The intact limb hip extension moment impulse increased (pre = -11.0 ± 3.6 Nm*s/kg, post = -16.5 ± 4.4 Nm*s/kg, p = 0.005) and sagittal plane hip moment impulse symmetry improved (flexion: pre = 23.1 ± 16.0 %, post = -3.9 ± 19.5 %, p = 0.004, extension: pre = 29.2 ± 20.3 %, post = 8.7 ± 22.9 %, p = 0.049). Residual limb knee extension moment impulse decreased compared to baseline (pre = 15.7 ± 10.8 Nm*s/kg, post = 7.8 ± 3.9 Nm*s/kg, p = 0.030). These results indicate that bone-anchored limb implantation alters multi-joint biomechanics, which may impact LBP or OA risk factors in the TTA population longitudinally.

Influence of Walking Over Unexpected Uneven Terrain on Joint Loading for Individuals With Transtibial Amputation.

Individuals with transtibial amputation (TTA) experience asymmetric lower-limb loading which can lead to joint pain and injuries. However, it is unclear how walking over unexpected uneven terrain affects their loading patterns. This study sought to use modeling and simulation to determine how peak joint contact forces and impulses change for individuals with unilateral TTA during an uneven step and subsequent recovery step and how those patterns compare to able-bodied individuals. We expected residual limb loading during the uneven step and intact limb loading during the recovery step would increase relative to flush walking. Further, individuals with TTA would experience larger loading increases compared to able-bodied individuals. Simulations of individuals with TTA showed during the uneven step, changes in joint loading occurred at all joints except the prosthetic ankle relative to flush walking. During the recovery step, intact limb joint loading increased in early stance relative to flush walking. Simulations of able-bodied individuals showed large increases in ankle joint loading for both surface conditions. Overall, increases in early stance knee joint loading were larger for those with TTA compared to able-bodied individuals during both steps. These results suggest that individuals with TTA experience altered joint loading patterns when stepping on uneven terrain. Future work should investigate whether an adapting ankle-foot prosthesis can mitigate these changes to reduce injury risk.

Hemodynamic and Metabolic Responses to Moderate and Vigorous Cycle Ergometry in Men Who Have Had Transtibial Amputation.

Adults who have had an amputation face barriers to having an active lifestyle which attenuates cardiorespiratory fitness. Prior studies in amputees typically involve treadmill walking or arm ergometry, yet physiological responses to bilateral leg cycling are less understood. This study assessed the hemodynamic and metabolic responses to moderate and vigorous cycle ergometry in men who have had a transtibial amputation (TTA). Five men who had had a unilateral TTA (age = 39 ± 15 yr) and six controls (CONs) without an amputation (age = 31 ± 11 yr) performed two 20 min bouts of cycling differing in intensity. Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and oxygen consumption (VO2) were measured during moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) and high intensity interval exercise (HIIE) using thoracic impedance and indirect calorimetry. In response to MICE and HIIE, the HR and VO2 levels were similar (p > 0.05) between groups. Stroke volume and CO were higher (p < 0.05) in the CONs, which was attributed to their higher body mass. In men with TTAs, HIIE elicited a peak HR = 88%HRmax and substantial blood lactate accumulation, representing vigorous exercise intensity. No adverse events were exhibited in the men with TTAs. The men with TTAs show similar responses to MICE and HIIE versus the CONs.

Sagittal and transverse ankle angle coupling can influence prosthetic socket transverse plane moments.

The intact foot and ankle comprise a complex set of joints that allow rotation in multiple planes of motion. Some of these motions are coupled, meaning rotation in one plane induces motion in another. One such coupling is between the sagittal and transverse planes. For every step, plantar- and dorsi-flexion motion is coupled with external and internal rotation of the shank relative to the foot, respectively. There is no prosthetic foot available for prescription that mimics this natural coupling. The purpose of this study was to determine if a sagittal:transverse ankle angle coupling ratio exists that minimizes the peak transverse plane moment during prosthetic limb stance. A novel, torsionally active prosthesis (TAP) was used to couple sagittal and transverse plane motions using a 60-watt motor. An embedded controller generated transverse plane rotation trajectories proportional to sagittal plane ankle angles corresponding to sagittal:transverse coupling ratios of 1:0 (rigid coupling analogous to the standard-of-care), 6:1, 4:1, 3:1, and 2:1. Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation were block randomized to walk in a straight line and in both directions around a 2 m circle at their self-selected speed with the TAP set at randomized coupling ratios. The primary outcome was the peak transverse plane moment, normalized to body mass, during prosthetic limb stance. Secondary outcomes included gait biomechanic metrics and a measure of satisfaction. Eleven individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations participated in the study. The 6:1 coupling ratio resulted in reduced peak transverse plane moments in pairwise comparisons with 3:1 and 2:1 coupling ratios while walking in a straight line and with the prosthesis on the outside of the circle (p < .05). Coupling ratio had no effect on gait biomechanic metrics or satisfaction. The general pattern of results suggests a quadratic relationship between the peak transverse plane moment and coupling ratio with a minimum at the 6:1 coupling ratio. The coupling ratio did not appear to adversely affect propulsion or body support. Subjects indicated they found all coupling ratios to be comfortable. While a mechatronic prosthesis like the TAP may have limited commercial potential, our future work includes testing a robust, passive prosthetic foot with a fixed coupling ratio.

Frequency of Low Back Pain and its Effect on Function and HealthRelated Quality of Life across Three Levels of Lower Limb Amputation: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Amputation is a profoundly life-altering event that can have both physical and psychological impacts on individuals. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the frequency of low back pain and its effect on function and health-related quality of life in individuals with various levels of lower limb amputation. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study at the Pakistan Institute of Prosthetic and Orthotics Peshawar (PIPOS) from May to September 2020, 264 participants were purposively selected. Inclusion criteria: males and females aged 18-65 with unilateral transfemoral, knee disarticulation, or transtibial amputations. Exclusion criteria: hearing/speech impairments, hip pathology, or bilateral lower limb amputation. Data collected via selfadministered questionnaires, including the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). Data analyzed using SPSS v.25. Results: Of the 264 participants, 219 were males (83%), and 45 were females (17%). There was significant connection between before and after amputation back pain (P &lt; 0.05). However, no notable link was observed between low back pain and the three amputation levels (P &gt; 0.05). Moreover, there was no statistical disparity in disability based on the level of amputation (P &gt; 0.05). Significantly, low back pain differed across all quality of life domains (P &lt; 0.05), except for mental and physical health. In contrast, no statistical variation was noted in the quality of life among the three amputation levels (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion: This study underscores the prevalence of low back pain in lower limb amputees. However, we did not find a clear association between low back pain and specific amputation levels (unilateral transfemoral, knee disarticulation, or transtibial amputation). Additionally, low back pain appears to impact disability and select aspects of quality of life, such as physical function, social function, and general health in individuals with lower limb amputation.

What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis.

People with lower limb loss (LLL) have reduced physical activity (PA). There is evidence of physical and psychosocial predictors of PA in older adults with limb loss. However, these 2 areas (physical/psychosocial) have not been evaluated in the same analysis. To describe and identify predictors of PA in individuals with LLL. Cross-sectional study. Secondary analysis of data from a multisite Canadian randomized control trial involving community-dwelling prosthetic ambulators with unilateral transtibial or transfemoral amputation (N = 72). The dependent variable was the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly. Potential predictors were four step square test, 2-minute walk test, Short Physical Performance Battery, Life Space Assessment, walking while talking test, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale. Seventy-two community-dwelling lower limb prosthesis users were enrolled. The sample included 62 male participants (86%), and 58 participants (81%) had transtibial amputation. The average age of participants was 65 (8.9) years, and for 49 participants (70%), the amputation was over 24 months ago. The total mean Standard Deviation (SD) Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly score was 153.2 (88.3), with scores of 148.1 (11.4) and 184.5 (24.7) for male and female participants, respectively. Regression analysis identified Life Space Assessment (β = 1.15, p = 0.007) and Short Physical Performance Battery (β = 3.51, p = 0.043) as statistically significant predictors accounting for 25% of the variance in PA. Community mobility and physical performance are the most meaningful predictors of PA. Future research should examine additional factors (e.g., environment, motivation). Understanding the predictors for PA after LLL would improve clinical practice as clinicians would have increased knowledge to modify and improve training.

Effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based structured exercise program in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation: a randomized controlled study

Purpose The study aimed to compare the effects of home exercise alone and telerehabilitation combined with home exercise in individuals with transtibial amputation. Materials and methods The telerehabilitation group (n = 24) received telerehabilitation combined with home exercise, while the control group (n = 24) received home exercise alone. Outcomes included the timed up-and-go (TUG) test and the 30-second chair-stand test (30CST), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The analysis used a 2 × 2 mixed repeated measures ANOVA. Results The group-by-time interactions were significant for TUG (p = 0.002, F[1;41] = 10.74) and 30CST (p = 0.001, F[1;41] = 11.48). The mean difference (6th week-baseline) was −0.49 for TUG and 0.95 for 30CST in the telerehabilitation group and −0.14 for TUG and 0.13 for 30CST in the control group. There were statistically meaningful group-by-time interactions on the ABC (p = 0.0004, F[1;41] = 14.47), the TAPES-activity restriction (p = 0.0001, F[1;41] = 28.96), TAPES-prosthesis satisfaction (p = 0.004, F[1;41] = 9.19), and the NHP (p = 0.0002, F[1;41] = 16.07) favoring the telerehabilitation group. Conclusions Telerehabilitation combined with home exercise can offer greater benefits in improving gait, muscle strength, balance confidence, activity restriction, prosthesis satisfaction, and quality of life compared to home exercise alone for individuals with transtibial amputation. Implications for rehabilitation Exercise helps individuals with lower limb amputation overcome their physical limitations and enables them to use their prostheses effectively. Physiotherapy and rehabilitation after amputation are not at the desired level, and individuals with lower limb amputation encounter various difficulties in accessing physiotherapy. Telerehabilitation has great potential to facilitate access to physiotherapy for individuals with amputation and reduce resource utilization. In a relatively small sample of amputees, this study shows that telerehabilitation-based exercise improves physical health and quality of life.

Comparing spinal loads in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation with and without chronic low back pain: An EMG-informed approach

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA), likely due in part to biomechanical factors. Here, three-dimensional full-body kinematics and kinetics during level-ground walking, at a self-selected and three controlled speeds (1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 m/s), were collected from twenty-one persons with unilateral transtibial LLA, with (n = 9) and without cLBP (n = 12). Peak compressive, mediolateral, and anteroposterior L5-S1 spinal loads were estimated from a full-body, transtibial amputation-specific OpenSim model and compared between groups. Predicted lumbar joint torques from muscle activations were compared to inverse dynamics and predicted and measured electromyographic muscle activations were compared for model evaluation and verification. There were no group differences in compressive or anterior shear forces (p > 0.466). During intact stance, peak ipsilateral loads increased with speed to a greater extent in the cLBP group vs. no cLBP group (p=0.023), while during prosthetic stance, peak contralateral loads were larger in the no cLBP group (p=0.047) and increased to a greater extent with walking speed compared to the cLBP group (p=0.008). During intact stance, intact side external obliques had higher activations in the no cLBP group (p=0.039), and internal obliques had higher activations in the cLBP group at faster walking speeds compared to the no cLBP group. Predicted muscle activations demonstrated similar activation patterns to electromyographic-measured activations (r = 0.56–0.96), and error between inverse dynamics and simulated spinal moments was low (0.08 Nm RMS error). Persons with transtibial LLA and cLBP may adopt movement strategies during walking to reduce mediolateral shear forces at the L5-S1 joint, particularly as walking speed increases. However, future work is needed to understand the time course from pain onset to chronification and the cumulative influence of increased spinal loads over time.

Modified motor unit properties in residual muscle following transtibial amputation

Objective. Neural signals in residual muscles of amputated limbs are frequently decoded to control powered prostheses. Yet myoelectric controllers assume muscle activities of residual muscles are similar to that of intact muscles. This study sought to understand potential changes to motor unit (MU) properties after limb amputation. Approach. Six people with unilateral transtibial amputation were recruited. Surface electromyogram (EMG) of residual and intact tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius (GA) muscles were recorded while subjects traced profiles targeting up to 20% and 35% of maximum activation for each muscle (isometric for intact limbs). EMG was decomposed into groups of MU spike trains. MU recruitment thresholds, action potential amplitudes (MU size), and firing rates were correlated to model Henneman’s size principle, the onion-skin phenomenon, and rate-size associations. Organization (correlation) and modulation (rates of change) of relations were compared between intact and residual muscles. Main results. The residual TA exhibited significantly lower correlation and flatter slopes in the size principle and onion-skin, and each outcome covaried between the MU relations. The residual GA was unaffected for most subjects. Subjects trained prior with myoelectric prostheses had minimally affected slopes in the TA. Rate-size association correlations were preserved, but both residual muscles exhibited flatter decay rates. Significance. We showed peripheral neuromuscular damage also leads to spinal-level functional reorganizations. Our findings suggest models of MU recruitment and discharge patterns for residual muscle EMG generation need reparameterization to account for disturbances observed. In the future, tracking MU pool adaptations may also provide a biomarker of neuromuscular control to aid training with myoelectric prostheses.

Changes in activities-specific balance confidence of active unilateral transtibial prosthesis users after provision of a self-aligning ankle foot.

Self-aligning ankle feet have an increased range of motion and are marketed to improve compliance over uneven terrain and increase function and balance; however, much of the existing literature focuses on the biomechanical aspect of these prostheses as opposed to patient-reported measures. To compare activities-specific balance confidence (ABC), health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), perceived mobility, gait speed, and step length before and after provision of a self-aligning ankle foot in the active unilateral transtibial prosthesis user. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Patient-reported and functional measures were captured for 85 users who were provided with a self-aligning ankle foot. Measures were recorded immediately before self-aligning ankle foot provision and again at 6 months afterward. The primary outcome was the ABC Score, along with the following secondary measures; HR-QoL using EQ-5D-5L Health Index Prosthetic Limb User Survey of Mobility and 10-meter timed walk test. The median age of the cohort was 55.2 years old and 71% were males, with the majority having their transtibial amputation due to trauma. There was a statistically significant improvement in ABC from 76 to 86% (p < 0.001) with a medium effect size. There was no statistically significant improvement in HR-QoL (p = 0.051), Prosthetic Limb User Survey of Mobility (p = 0.043), time taken to walk 10 m (p = 0.15) and step length (p = 0.003). Self aligning ankle feet increased ABC and step length with no detrimental effect on HR-QoL, perceived mobility or walking speed in those with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation.

Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level

Maintaining forward walking during human locomotion requires mechanical joint work, mainly provided by the ankle–foot in non-amputees. In lower-limb amputees, their metabolic overconsumption is generally attributed to reduced propulsion. However, it remains unclear how altered walking patterns resulting from amputation affect energy exchange. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of self-selected walking speed (SSWS) on mechanical works generated by the ankle–foot and by the entire lower limbs depending on the level of amputation. 155 participants, including 47 non-amputees (NAs), 40 unilateral transtibial amputees (TTs) and 68 unilateral transfemoral amputees (TFs), walked at their SSWS. Positive push-off work done by the trailing limb (WStS+) and its associated ankle–foot (Wankle-foot+), as well as negative collision work done by the leading limb (WStS-) were analysed during the transition from prosthetic limb to contralateral limb. An ANCOVA was performed to assess the effect of amputation level on mechanical works, while controlling for SSWS effect. After adjusting for SSWS, NAs produce more push-off work with both their biological ankle–foot and trailing limb than amputees do on prosthetic side. Using the same type of prosthetic feet, TTs and TFs can generate the same amount of prosthetic Wankle-foot+, while prosthetic WStS+ is significantly higher for TTs and remains constant with SSWS for TFs. Surprisingly and contrary to theoretical expectations, the lack of propulsion at TFs’ prosthetic limb did not affect their contralateral WStS-, for which a difference is significant only between NAs and TTs. Further studies should investigate the relationship between the TFs' inability to increase prosthetic limb push-off work and metabolic expenditure.

Sensorimotor function and standing balance in older adults with transtibial limb loss

BackgroundLimited research has focused on older prosthesis users despite the expected compounded effects of age and amputation on sensorimotor function, balance, and falls. This study compared sensorimotor factors and standing balance between older individuals with and without transtibial amputation, hypothesizing that prosthesis users would demonstrate worse sensorimotor function. Secondarily we assessed the relationship between standing balance and somatosensation in prosthesis users. MethodsThirteen persons with unilateral transtibial amputation (71.7 years) and 10 able-bodied controls (71.7 years) participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Passive joint range-of-motion, muscle strength, proprioception (joint position sense), tactile sensitivity, and standing balance (center-of-pressure sway) were compared between groups. A multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between proprioception and balance (without vision) in prosthesis users. FindingsOur hypotheses were generally not supported, with the only differences being reduced joint range-of-motion and strength in prosthesis users (with large effect sizes), but comparable sensation and balance. Notably, prosthesis users demonstrated better proprioception than controls as reflected through better joint position sense when the limb was non-weight bearing. Worse amputated limb proprioception was associated with better standing balance in prosthesis users. InterpretationOlder prosthesis users have impaired passive joint motion and muscle strength compared to controls that could challenge their ability to position and control the amputated limb to avoid falls during daily activities. However, their better amputated limb proprioception might help counteract those limitations by leveraging sensory feedback from the suspended limb. The relationship between amputated limb proprioception and standing balance suggests a nuanced relationship that warrants further study.

Quality of Life in People with Diabetes Mellitus and Unilateral Transtibial Amputation - Aspects of Using the Berg Balance Scale.

Approximately 40%-60% of all amputations are lower limb amputations (LLAs) related to diabetes mellitus (DM). The importance of quality of life (QoL) is increasingly recognized as after amputation. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to compare QoL (evaluated by Berg Balance Scale, BBS) in DM patients with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) using prosthesis (group A) with that of patients amputated due to other causes (group B). Overall, 32 patients completed two questionnaires: the 36-Item Health Survey (SF - 36) for QoL assessment and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale-Revised (TAPES-R). In group A, patients were significantly older (P < .05) with shorter periods of prosthesis use (P < .05) and had significantly lower (P = .008) adjustment to limitation (TAPES-R). Correlations were found between BBS score and SF-36, including physical functioning (P < .001, r = 0.682), energy and fatigue (P < .001, r = 0.643) and emotional well-being (P < .001, r = 0.644). In the TAPES-R, a large negative correlation was found between BBS and activity restriction (P = .001, r = -0.595). Poorer balance ability, greater activity limitation, and worse psychosocial adjustment to the prosthesis were found in patients with unilateral TTA and DM compared to TTA prosthesis users without DM.

Stimulation of peroneal nerves reveals maintained somatosensory representation in transtibial amputees.

Several studies have found changes in the organization of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) after amputation. This SI reorganization was mainly investigated by stimulating neighboring areas to amputation. Unexpectedly, the somatosensory representation of the deafferented limb has rarely been directly tested. We stimulated the truncated peroneal nerve in 24 unilateral transtibial amputees and 15 healthy controls. The stimulation intensity was adjusted to make the elicited percept comparable between both stimulation sides. Neural sources of the somatosensory-evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) to peroneal stimulation were localized in the contralateral foot/leg areas of SI in 19 patients and 14 healthy controls. We demonstrated the activation of functionally preserved cortical representations of amputated lower limbs. None of the patients reported evoked phantom limb pain (PLP) during stimulation. Stimulation that evoked perceptions in the foot required stronger intensities on the amputated side than on the intact side. In addition to this, stronger stimulation intensities were required for amputees than for healthy controls. Exploratorily, PLP intensity was neither associated with stimulation intensity nor dipole strength nor with differences in Euclidean distances (between SEF sources of the healthy peroneus and mirrored SEF sources of the truncated peroneus). Our results provide hope that the truncated nerve may be used to establish both motor control and somatosensory feedback via the nerve trunk when a permanently functional connection between the nerve trunk and the prosthesis becomes available.