Unilateral Nerve-sparing Groups Research Articles

Optimizing Nerve Sparing in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Investigation of Traditional and Modified Endopelvic Fascia Preservation Techniques.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men. In 2000, Abbou performed the first robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, and radical prostatectomy has developed rapidly. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a valuable therapeutic option for the management of localized Pca. To present the functional outcome of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using traditional and modified endopelvic fascia preservation methods in a single center in Vietnam. We prospectively analyzed a series of 65 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2020 to 2023. All of those were operated by DaVinci Si system robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Twenties patients were applied with a modified nerve-sparing technique, intrafascial dissection, and lateral prostatic fascia preservation, leaving the lateral tissue, including the neurovascular bundle, untouched and covered. We used the traditional approach, intrafascial nerve-sparing with open endopelvic fascia and lateral prostatic fascia in 45 cases. Patients were followed up to 12 months to assess the continence and erectile function by using IIEF-5 and EPIC questionnaires. The study sample included 65 cases; the mean patient age was 64.21 ± 6.68, erection rate after surgery at six months in bilateral NS was 36.58% (15/41) in the traditional group, and 68.42% (13/19) in the modified group (p=0.028). The patient did not recover erectile ability in the group of elderly patients (>65 years old) and unilateral nerve-sparing group. The continence rate six months after surgery was 86.66 % in the conventional group and 85% in the modified group, with no significant difference between the two groups. In the potency group, the IIEF-5 score was 13 ± 4.9, and the EPIC-26 score was 62.20 ± 10.04. Erectile ability in the modified group was better than the traditional group at six months after surgery. Our results showed better potency recovery in the modified group. These results should be tested in future research with randomized studies.

The impact of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on lower urinary tract function: Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and frequency volume charts.

To elucidate the effects of a nerve-sparing (NS) procedure on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and urinary function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), the associations between the NS procedure and LUTS and urinary function were investigated. The participants in this study were 200 consecutive patients who underwent RARP. These patients were categorized into unilateral and bilateral NS groups and the non-NS group. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) index, frequency-volume chart, uroflowmetry, 1-h pad test, and the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire were evaluated before and after RARP. The total IPSS score was significantly lower in the unilateral (P = 0.03) and bilateral NS groups (P = 0.03) than in the non-NS group after RARP. Diurnal maximum voided volume (MVV) values were significantly greater in the bilateral NS group than in the non-NS group after RARP (P = 0.002). Nocturnal frequency was significantly decreased in the unilateral NS group than in the non-NS group after RARP (3 months P = 0.01, 12 months P = 0.01). Erectile function was significantly better in both the unilateral NS group (P < 0.0001) and the bilateral NS group (P = 0.02) than in the non-NS group 12 months after RARP. The NS procedure in RARP has the possibility to improve not only erectile function, but also LUTS, owing to both the increase of MVV and the decrease of nocturia. Therefore, the NS procedure is also recommended from the viewpoint of early improvement of LUTS and lower urinary tract dysfunction after RARP.

Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: The University of Leipzig Experience of 2000 Cases

Review of experience with endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) for localized prostate cancer. 2000 patients underwent EERPE. Mean age of the patients was 63.2 (41-77) years. Mean preoperative PSA was 10.2 ng/ml (0.64-82 ng/ml). 601 patients had undergone previous surgery. The functional and oncological outcomes were reviewed. Mean operation time was 156 (50-320) min. Complication rate according to Clavien system was: 0.45% intraoperatively, 8.6% in the early and 0.3% in the late postoperative period. Positive surgical margins were found in 127 patients with pT2 stage (9.7%) and in 237 patients with pT3 stage (34.4%). 44/937 lymphadenectomies (4.7%) had positive lymph nodes. Mean catheterization time was 6.3 days. After 12 months, 92% of the patients were completely continent, 7% needed 1-2 pads/day and 1% used more than 2 pads daily.730 patients underwent nerve sparing procedure. The 12 month potency rates with or without administration of PDE 5 inhibitors were 34.1% in the unilateral nerve sparing group and 67.7% in the bilateral group. In the intrafascial nsEERPE group, after 12 months, 93.2% of the patients were completely continent, 7.1% required 1-2 pads per day and 0.6% more than 2 pads per day. Twelve months potency rate for unilateral and bilateral nerve sparing intrafascial procedure was 33.3% and 78.5 % respectively. The rate of positive surgical margins was 6.3% in pT2 and 21.2% in pT3 specimens. Functional and oncological results of this large series are promising. The recently introduced intrafascial nsEERPE further improves the outcome of the procedure.

Impact of Unilateral Sural Nerve Graft on Recovery of Potency and Continence Following Radical Prostatectomy: 3-Year Longitudinal Study

We conducted a 3-year longitudinal study assessing the impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy. A total of 113 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy were classified into 3 groups according to the degree of nerve sparing, that is unilateral nerve preservation with contralateral sural nerve graft interposition, bilateral nerve sparing and unilateral nerve sparing. Urinary continence and potency were estimated by the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index questionnaire. Patients in the nerve sparing plus sural nerve graft group were younger than those in the bilateral nerve sparing or unilateral nerve sparing groups. At baseline the unilateral nerve sparing plus sural nerve graft group and the bilateral nerve sparing group reported better sexual function than the unilateral nerve sparing group (62.1 and 61.5 vs 49.9, p<0.05). The bilateral nerve sparing group showed more rapid recovery than the unilateral nerve sparing plus sural nerve graft group after radical retropubic prostatectomy (p<0.01). After 24 months there were no significant differences observed between the bilateral nerve sparing and the unilateral nerve sparing plus sural nerve graft group (28.7 vs 32.9). The bilateral nerve sparing group reported a better sexual function score than the unilateral nerve sparing group throughout the postoperative period (p<0.05). The bilateral nerve sparing group maintained significantly better urinary function at 1 month after radical retropubic prostatectomy than the unilateral nerve sparing plus sural nerve graft group (p <0.05). After 3 months these groups were almost continent. The unilateral nerve sparing group reported lower urinary function scores during the first year compared to the other groups. The nerve graft procedure may contribute to the recovery of urinary function as well as sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy. This finding needs to be validated in a randomized trial.

Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases

We herein review our experience with endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) as a first line therapy for localized prostate cancer. A series of 1,300 patients underwent EERPE ("wide excision", standard nervesparing technique (nsEERPE), or intrafascial nsEERPE). The mean age of the patients was 63.3 years. Preoperative PSA mean value was 10.1 ng/ml. A total of 415 patients had undergone previous surgical procedure in the lower abdomen (n = 336) and prior surgery of the prostate (n = 79), respectively. The EERPE was employed in all cases without any specific selection criteria. Mean operative time was 153 (50-320) min. including lymphadenectomy with no conversion to open surgery. Seven intraoperative, 91 early and 4 late complications occurred. The transfusion rate was 0.9%. Positive surgical margins were found in 83 patients with pT2 stage (9.8%) and in 154 patients in pT3 stage (34.3%). The mean catheterization time was 6.2 days. The 12 month follow up indicated continence rate of 91.9% and potency rates of 34% in the unilateral nerve sparing group and 69.8% in the bilateral group. In the intrafascial nsEERPE group potency rates were 33.3% (unilateral) and 79.1% (bilateral) after 12 months. Postoperative positive surgical margins rate were 6.1% for pT2 and 20% for pT3 and the complications rate 4%. The results of this large series of 1,300 patients are promising. The recently introduced intrafascial nsEERPE further ameliorates the outcome of the procedure.

Impact of unilateral interposition sural nerve graft on the recovery of sexual function after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men: A preliminary study

To determine the effect of an interposition nerve graft on sexual function after radical prostatectomy. This study includes 64 patients, without hormonal therapy, who underwent a radical prostatectomy and intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of cavernous nerve preservation. Twelve patients underwent a unilateral interposition sural nerve graft (UNG) for the resected neurovascular bundle. Twenty-one and 31 patients underwent bilateral nerve-sparing (BNS) and unilateral nerve-sparing (UNS) surgery without a nerve graft, respectively. As the age of patients was significantly younger in the UNG group than in the other groups, age-matched analysis also was conducted. Sexual function, evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire using the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index, was compared statistically among the three groups. In the age-matched analysis, the postoperative sexual function (SXF) score of the UNG group showed an intermediate level of recovery between those of the BNS and UNS groups at 12 months and reached the same level as the score at 12 months of the BNS group at 18 months postoperatively. The difference in the SXF score between the UNG and UNS groups began to appear after 6 months postoperatively and increased steadily with time. However, the background factors, such as the baseline SXF score, the usage rate of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, and the rate of comorbidities were different between the UNG and UNS groups. The difference of the SXF score between the UNG and UNS groups increased with time after 6 months postoperatively. However, it might be difficult at present to attribute a better recovery of the SXF score to the nerve graft because of the difference in the background factors between the groups.

Intraoperative Electrophysiological Confirmation of Neurovascular Bundle Preservation during Radical Prostatectomy: Long-term Assessment of Urinary and Sexual Function

We investigated the longitudinal recovery of urinary and sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) using an intraoperative electrophysiological test to confirm the functional preservation of the neurovascular bundle (NVB). A total of 70 patients who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in our survey. During RP, electrophysiological testing was performed to confirm the NVB preservation. The NVB was electrostimulated and the responses were observed by monitoring the intracavernous or intraurethral pressure changes. All patients were classified into three groups according to the degree of nerve-sparing [a bilateral nerve-sparing group (BNS), a unilateral nerve-sparing group (UNS) and a non-nerve-sparing group (NNS)] based on the macroanatomical as well as the electrophysiological assessment. Both urinary and sexual function were measured before and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after RP by a self-administered questionnaire. The concordance rate of nerve-sparing or non-nerve-sparing between the electrophysiological and macroanatomical assessment was 80%. According to the electrophysiological data, the BNS maintained significantly better urinary function at 3 months after RP than the NNS and UNS. After 6 months, each group had almost recovered continence. When considering sexual function, the BNS showed better sexual function scores than the NNS throughout the post-operative periods and the UNS at 2 years. According to the macroanatomical assessment, however, these differences were significant. Nerve-sparing RP as confirmed by intraoperative electrophysiological test may contribute significantly to the early recovery of continence and greater rate of sexual function after RP.

INTRAOPERATIVE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL CONFIRMATION OF URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

To determine the actual effect of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) on postoperative urinary continence we used intraoperative electrophysiological testing to confirm functional preservation of the neurovascular bundle (NVB). A total of 85 patients undergoing RP for localized prostate cancer were studied. During RP NVB preservation was assessed macroanatomically. Electrophysiological testing was then performed to confirm NVB preservation. The NVB was electrostimulated and responses were observed by monitoring intracavernous or intraurethral pressure changes. All patients were classified into 3 groups according to the degree of nerve sparing, that is a bilateral nerve sparing group, a unilateral nerve sparing group and a nonnerve sparing group, based on macroanatomical assessment as well as on electrophysiological assessment. Postoperative continence in each group was then determined. Urinary continence at baseline, and 3 and 6 months postoperatively was studied using a self-administered questionnaire. With electrophysiological assessment 20.6% of macroanatomically determined NVB preservations were reclassified. Analysis of the data on groups classified accurately by electrophysiological testing showed that the bilateral nerve sparing group maintained postoperative urinary function significantly more than the unilateral nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing groups. However, when only macroanatomical assessment was considered, no significant difference among the groups was found in urinary function. Electrophysiological assessment revealed that bilateral NVB preservation contributes to early recovery of urinary continence after RP. Thus, intraoperative electrophysiological assessment is useful for predicting postoperative quality of life.

Efficacy and factors associated with successful outcome of sildenafil citrate use for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy

Objectives To assess the efficacy and factors associated with successful treatment of sildenafil citrate for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Of the 470 patients who underwent RP at our institution between July 1998 and January 2000, 227 (48%) sought treatment for erectile dysfunction, and 174 (37%) were prescribed sildenafil citrate. The starting dose was 50 mg, which was increased to 100 mg if the patient did not have a positive response. Of the 174 patients, 104 (59.8%) had undergone a bilateral nerve-sparing (NS) procedure, 28 (16.1%) had undergone a unilateral NS procedure, and 42 (24.1%) had undergone a non-NS procedure. Erectile function was assessed by the abridged five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire, referred to as the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), at baseline and 1 year after sildenafil use. The patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed to find factors associated with a successful outcome, which was defined as successful vaginal intercourse. Association with success was assessed by chi-square analysis and the Cochran Armitage test for trend. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used, with an overall significance level of 0.05 for each factor assessed. Results The mean age was 60.1 ± 6.25 years, and the mean interval from RP to drug use was 3 months. After treatment with sildenafil, 100 (57%) of 174 patients responded to the drug: 79 (76%) of 104 in the bilateral NS group, 15 (53.5%) of 28 in the unilateral NS group, and 6 (14.2%) of 42 in the non-NS group. SHIM analysis showed that the magnitude of the improvement was greater in the bilateral NS group (19.97 ± 1.12) than in the unilateral NS (15.89 ± 3.38) or non-NS (10.06 ± 2.0) groups ( P <0.020). Four factors were significantly associated statistically with a successful outcome: the presence of at least one neurovascular bundle, a preoperative SHIM score of 15 or greater, age 65 years old or younger, and interval from RP to drug use of more than 6 months ( P <0.001). Conclusions The efficacy of sildenafil citrate after RP correlated with the degree of neurovascular bundle preservation, preoperative erectile function status, age, and interval before starting treatment.

Patient Reported Sexual Function Following Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

We evaluated the sexual function of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We assessed the effect of unilateral or bilateral preservation of the neurovascular bundle on the ability to achieve erections and have sexual intercourse postoperatively. Between May 1998 and September 2001, 232 men underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer at our institution. Sexual function questionnaires were given to the patients preoperatively. The study included 143 patients who were potent preoperatively. After the procedure the surgeon noted whether he performed unilateral, bilateral or no nerve sparing. Sexual function questionnaires were collected at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Of the 143 patients, 100, 80, 48 and 26 responded to the questionnaire at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. Of the nonnerve sparing group 11.7%, 11.1%, 16.6% and 30%, of the unilateral nerve sparing group 20%, 35%, 41.6% and 50% and of the bilateral nerve sparing group 32.5%, 41.1%, 29.1% and 87.5% respectively reported spontaneous erections 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, respectively. The overall incidence of positive lateral surgical margins in pT2 cases treated with a nerve sparing procedure was 8.4%. The overall rate of patients who had erections preoperatively and maintained erections after surgery (53.8%) is comparable to the results for open surgery. Patients with bilateral preservation did better than those with unilateral preservation. Our preliminary results show a promising rate of potency at 1 year after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.