Unilateral Hearing Loss Research Articles

The Otoacoustic Emissions in the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening: An Update on the European Data (2004 to 2024)

Background: The reported data on European universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) practices tend to be scarce, despite the fact that the European Union project, EUScreen, collected unofficial data from 38 collaborating European institutions. The objectives of this systematic review were as follows: (a) to identify the most recent (in a 20-year span) literature information about UNHS programs in Europe and (b) to provide data on the procedures used to assess the population, the intervention policies, and on the estimated prevalence of congenital hearing loss with emphasis on the bilateral hearing loss cases. Methods: Queries were conducted via the Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases for the time period of 2004–2024. The Mesh terms used were “OAE”, “Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening”, “congenital hearing loss” and “well babies”. Only research articles and review papers of European origin were considered good candidates. The standard English language filter was not used, in order to identify information from non-English-speaking scientific communities and groups. Results: Very few data and reports were identified in the literature search. Eleven manuscripts were identified corresponding to eight UNHS programs. Except in Poland, most of the data refer to regional and not national programs. The screening coverage estimates of all programs exceed 90%; infants were mostly assessed by a three-stage protocol (TEOAE + TEOAE + AABR), followed by a clinical ABR test. The average prevalence (i.e., from well babies AND NICU infants) of bilateral hearing loss ranged from 0.5 to 20.94 per 1000 (Zurich sample). Infants presenting unilateral or bilateral hearing losses were first rehabilitated by hearing aids and consequently (>15 mo) by cochlear implants. Conclusions: Even though UNHS programs are well-established clinical practices in the European States, the amount of information in the literature about these programs is surprising low. The existing data in the timespan 2004–2024 corroborate the international UNHS data in terms of coverage and bilateral hearing loss prevalence, but there is a strong need to supplement the existing information with the latest developments, especially in the area of hearing loss rehabilitation.

Expert opinion on candidacy for bone conduction hearing implants Osia System and Baha Connect System.

<b>Introduction:</b> Bone conduction hearing implants (BCHI) are a widely used rehabilitation solution for patients with conductive hearing loss (CHL), mixed hearing loss (MHL), or single-sided deafness (SSD).<b>Aim:</b> This expert review presents candidacy criteria considerations when choosing between active transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing devices (Osia<sup></sup> System) and passive percutaneous bone-conduction hearing devices (Baha<sup></sup> Connect System) to help streamline the decision-making process in those contexts where economics have a major impact on professionals' and patients' choice.<b>Methods:</b> Eight experts participated in two online surveys and two virtual meetings to discuss real-world clinical experience to highlight treatment approaches and factors considered when counseling the patients and selecting an optimal BCHI solution. Key considerations for decision-making were recorded following consensus from all experts.<b>Conclusions:</b> Aspects in decision making include the requirement to use local <i>versus</i> general anesthesia for the implantation procedure, bone thickness, considerations for future magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures, and patient preference. Increased risk of skin infections, requirements for cleaning and managing the implant site, particularly for those with limited dexterity, as well as esthetic concerns could make the Baha<sup></sup> Connect System unsuitable for some patients. In these cases, the Osia<sup></sup> System may provide clear advantages, particularly in patients for whom good hearing performance is a priority, and this would need to be discussed individually with the patient in a multidisciplinary setting. Conversely, for patients requiring minimally invasive surgery, who have contraindications for general anesthesia or require frequent head MRI scans in the future, the Baha Connect System may be more suitable.

Clinical Outcomes for Adult Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implantees Exceeding the 5% Candidacy Criterion

Objectives: While single-sided deafness cochlear implants (SSD-CIs) have now received regulatory approval in the United States, candidate-ear candidacy criteria (no better than 5% word-recognition score) are stricter than for traditional CI candidates (50 to 60% speech recognition, best-aided condition). SSD implantation in our center began before regulatory approval, using a criterion derived from traditional candidacy: 50% consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word-identification score in the candidate ear. A retrospective analysis investigated whether SSD patients exceeding the 5% CNC criterion nevertheless benefitted from a CI as assessed by spatial-hearing tests (speech understanding in noise [SIN] and localization) and by a patient-reported outcome measure quality-of-life instrument validated for patients with CIs. Design: A retrospective chart review assessed the clinical experience of a single CI center. Subjects consisted of 27 adult CI recipients with SSD (N = 21) or asymmetric hearing loss (AHL; N = 6) implanted since September 2019 with at least 3 months of postoperative follow-up. Patients with revision surgery or simultaneous labyrinthectomy and CI surgery were excluded from the sample. Subjects were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative CNC scores measured under best-aided conditions with a behind-the-ear hearing aid in the sound field at 0.9 m from a front loudspeaker, and the better ear masked using an insert earphone with 45 dB HL speech-weighted noise. The “MEETS” group had preoperative CNC word scores <5%; the “EXCEEDS” group had scores >5%. The clinical protocol also included intelligibility tests using AzBio sentences in the same test conditions as CNC; binaural spatial testing (broadband-noise sound localization, and matrix-sentence speech-reception thresholds in spatially separated noise) using a custom-built 7-speaker array; and the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL) instrument. To evaluate CI benefit, preoperative unaided performance was compared with postoperative binaural (acoustic ear + CI ear) performance at a clinic visit closest to 6 months postsurgery. Results: Of 27 SSD-CI recipients, 11 subjects exceeded the 5% preoperative CNC candidacy criterion. Both the MEETS and EXCEEDS groups improved significantly on all 5 primary study outcome measures (CI-alone CNC and AzBio, binaural SIN and sound localization, and CIQOL). The only statistically significant differences observed between the MEETS and EXCEEDS groups were that preoperative CNC and AzBio scores were significantly higher for the EXCEEDS group, as expected given that the groups were defined based on preoperative speech-perception scores in quiet. There were no statistically significant differences between the MEETS and EXCEEDS groups in postoperative scores in any test or in the magnitude of the improvement from preoperative to postoperative assessment. Conclusions: SSD- and AHL-CI recipients exceeding the 5% CNC preoperative candidacy criterion significantly improved in CI-alone speech perception, spatial hearing, and subjectively reported CIQOL outcomes and the observed benefits were indistinguishable from SSD- and AHL-CI recipients who met the 5% criterion. A less-restrictive SSD-CI and AHL-CI candidacy criterion should be considered, and larger-scale clinical trials to evaluate CI efficacy using a less-stringent candidate-ear criterion are warranted.

Cochlear implant usage in single sided deafness and factors affecting usage

Objectives The primary objective was to examine duration of daily cochlear implant (CI) usage at 12 and 24 months post-operatively in single sided deafness (SSD). The secondary objective was to examine factors that could affect CI usage. Methods Retrospective cohort of patients with SSD who received CI from January 2015 to March 2020. CI usage was evaluated at 12 and 24 months. Hearing loss duration, tinnitus scores and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were correlated with CI usage at 12 months. Results Usage data was available for 54 patients at 12 months and 38 patients at 24 months. The mean usage was 8.2 h/day (SD 4.2) at 12 months, 7.0 h/day (SD 5.1) at 24 months. 5 out of 54 (9.3%) and 7 out of 38 patients (18.4%) were non-users at 12 and 24 months post-operatively. An improved mean SNR score from pre-operative 4.4 dB (SD 2.8) to – 0.70 dB (SD 4.2) at 12 months post-operative was positively correlated with CI usage at 12 and 24 months. Hearing loss duration and tinnitus scores were not associated with CI usage. Conclusions 18.4% of our patients were non-users at 24 months. Mean usage at 24 months was 7.0 h/day. Improved hearing in noise at 12 months was correlated with better usage.

Auditory Rehabilitation in Single-Sided-Deafened Patients after Surgery to the Cerebellopontine Angle for Vestibular Schwannoma: What Is the Patient’s Choice?

Background: Surgical resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS) can be responsible for single-sided deafness (SSD). Hearing restoration can be a challenge both for the otolaryngologist and the patient. Patients and Methods: In a retrospective series, we analyzed the charts of SSD patients operated on for VS from 2005–2021, checking which type of hearing rehabilitation was chosen. All patients who wanted a hearing restoration underwent a hearing in noise test (HINT) in a stereo auditorium with and without a bone-anchored hearing device (BAHD) worn with a headband on the deaf side. Then, they had a preimplantation one-month trial with the BAHD at home vs. contralateral routing of signal (CROS) or BiCROS (with contralateral signal amplification) hearing aids (HAs). Results: Among 52 charts of the included adult SSD patients, only 29 (56%) eventually chose a hearing rehabilitation device (14 BAHD). Only one BAHD patient required a device explantation for skin complications, but then asked for reimplantation. Another one swapped the BAHD for HAs 2.5 years after. Two patients only occasionally used their BAHD with a headband. Nine patients preferred HAs, mainly BiCROS. Their contralateral hearing was significantly less than BAHD patients (p < 0.05), and only three used their HAs every day. Conclusions: Hearing rehabilitation in SSD patients after VS surgical resection is chosen in about 50% of cases. In complement of HINT, a real-life comparative hearing trial helps patients chose the best device, with good long-term results when a BAHD is chosen. HAs are preferred when contralateral hearing is altered but are not always worn.

Audiometric Profiles Across a Clinical Population of Children With Hyperacusis.

Hyperacusis (sound sensitivity) is well documented among adults, but little is known about hyperacusis in children. Here, we assess relationships among the presence of hyperacusis, audiometric profiles, and nonauditory factors in a pediatric clinical population. A retrospective review of clinical records from 329 children, ages 2-17 years, was performed to assess the prevalence of hyperacusis and correlations among hearing status, behavioral or communication concerns, and the presence of hyperacusis. In 329 study participants, 18% reported hyperacusis (58% male and 42% female). No significant sex or age differences were found. Hyperacusis was more likely to occur alongside normal hearing or with unilateral hearing loss relative to bilateral hearing loss. Among children with hyperacusis, there was a high prevalence of audiovestibular problems, mental health concerns, speech and language delays, difficulty in school, and behavioral problems. Tinnitus was also found to be comorbid with hyperacusis, but the comorbidity was less than that reported in adults. This study identified common hearing profiles and critical comorbidities in a large clinical cohort of children with hyperacusis. These results demonstrate the urgent need for standardized multidisciplinary assessment and treatment protocols for pediatric hyperacusis.

Cochlear implantation for children with single-sided deafness: parents’ perspectives

ABSTRACT Historically, cochlear implantation is reserved for those with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. However, indications have expanded to include Single-Sided Deafness (SSD) because of the known benefits of binaural hearing and the limitations of unilateral hearing, especially for children developing linguistic and cognitive skills. This study aimed to provide a qualitative perspective of lived experiences of children with SSD who use a cochlear implant (CI), as perceived and reported by their parents. An online questionnaire was developed and distributed to evaluate outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with SSD residing in New Zealand and the United States. Qualitative content analysis of open-ended questions identified themes, including: (1) motivating factors; (2) benefits of amplification; (3) challenges associated with the CI journey; and (4) advice to parents. Parents described benefits and challenges as a result of cochlear implantation, such as access to sound and academic and psychosocial development, as well as subjective improvements in spatial hearing, reduced listening fatigue, enhanced academic performance, and changes in quality of life. The difference that bilateral hearing makes to a child’s development is difficult to precisely define but parental insights offer valuable perspective to healthcare providers when considering what some consider an elective procedure.

Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Retrospective Observational Study.

The leading nonhereditary cause of childhood sensorineural hearing loss has been attributed to congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV). Sensorineural hearing loss can be unilateral (UHL) or bilateral (BHL), and may be progressive. Our objective was to describe the characteristics, clinical nature and follow-up of ears in cCMV-associated UHL. This 16-year retrospective study was performed at Schneider's Medical Center, Israel. Data were collected from all cCMV infants with UHL at birth who were treated with antiviral treatment initiated within the first 4 weeks of life and had a follow-up period of at least 1 year. We enrolled 67 infants diagnosed with UHL at birth: 17 (25%) with mild hearing loss, 22 (33%) with moderate hearing loss and 28 (42%) with severe hearing loss. At the last follow-up visit, 7 (41%) ears in the mild hearing loss group improved to normal hearing, 8 (47%) ears exhibited no change and 2 (12%) ears deteriorated. In the moderate hearing loss group, 9 (41%) ears improved, 7 (32%) remained static and 6 (27%) deteriorated to the severe hearing loss group. One (4%) ear in the severe hearing loss group showed improvement. Of the 67 ears with normal hearing at birth, 4 (6%) ears deteriorated. This study assessed and elucidated the characteristics, clinical nature and long-term follow-up of both the affected and unaffected ears diagnosed with UHL due to cCMV. These data are crucial when medical and/or surgical interventions are considered.

Outcome Evaluation of BAHA Attract System Implantations.

Bone Anchored Hearing Aids (BAHAs) are currently well-utilized for treatment of hearing-impaired patients with unilateral or bilateral mixed and conductive hearing loss as well as patients with single sided deafness. The objective of this study is to evaluate outcome of BAHA Attract system in terms of surgical, functional,audiological and cosmetic results This is a prospective observational study of 15 consecutive patients of single sided deafness (SSD) who qualified for and underwent BAHA Attract surgery at a tertiary care hospital over a duration of two years. Parameters analysed were: (1) Surgery and wound healing, (2) Post-operative functional results (Bern Benefit for Single sided deafness questionnaire (BBSSQ)), (3) audiological results (free field speech in noise audiometry in two situations: with signal from implanted side and from contralateral side), (4) Cosmetic results (introduction of novel Three Points Scoring System (TPSS). Clinico-radiological planning of surgical site for implant is also described.Mean surgical time was 39 minutes and healing was uneventful in 73 % of patients. All patients reported improvement in all ten hearing situations with maximum improvement for sound localization. Significant improvement of speech in noise was seen especially when signal was presented from implanted side. All patient had full score in TPSS for cosmesis except one patient. This was the same patient in whom clinico-radiologically planned site was discarded intraoperatively due to overpneumatised temporal bone.BAHA Attract system is safeand effective solution for single sided deafness with acceptable cosmesis.

Perception of voice cues and speech-in-speech by children with prelingual single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant

Voice cues, such as fundamental frequency (F0) and vocal tract length (VTL), help listeners identify the speaker's gender, perceive the linguistic and emotional prosody, and segregate competing talkers. Postlingually implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) users seem to have difficulty in perceiving and making use of voice cues, especially of VTL. Early implanted child CI users, in contrast, perceive and make use of both voice cues better than CI adults, and in patterns similar to their peers with normal hearing (NH).In our study, we investigated the perception and use of voice cues in children with single-sided deafness (SSD) who received their CI at an early age (SSD+CI), in an attempt to bridge the gap between these two groups. The SSD+CI children have access to bilateral auditory information and often receive their CI at an early age, similar to CI children. They may also have dominant acoustic representations, similar to CI adults who acquired hearing loss at a later age. As such, the current study aimed to investigate the perception and use of voice cues by a group of nine early-implanted children with prelingual SSD. The study consisted of three experiments: F0 and VTL discrimination, voice gender categorization, and speech-in-speech perception. In each experiment, the results of the SSD group are compared to children and adults with CIs (for their CI ear) and with typical hearing (for their NH ear).Overall, the SSD+CI children had poorer VTL detection thresholds with their CI compared to their NH ear, while their F0 perception was similar across ears. Detection thresholds for both F0 and VTL with their CI ear was comparable to those of bilaterally implanted CI children, suggesting that SSD+CI children do not only rely on their NH ear, but actually make use of their CI. SSD+CI children relied more heavily on F0 cues than on VTL cues for voice gender categorization, with cue weighting patterns comparable to those of CI adults. In contrast to CI children, the SSD+CI children showed limited speech perception benefit based on F0 and VTL differences between the target and masker speaker, which again corresponded to the results of CI adults. Altogether, the SSD+CI children make good use of their CI, despite a good-hearing ear, however, the perceptual patterns seem to fall in-between those of CI children and CI adults. Perhaps a combination of childhood neuroplasticity, limited experience with relying only on the CI, and a dominant acoustic representation of voice gender explain these results.

Unveiling a Rare Phenomenon: Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Skin Prick Testing.

The skin prick test (SPT) is a standard method for diagnosing allergic diseases, while sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) remains a perplexing condition often of unknown etiology. We present a unique case of SSNHL emerging shortly after an SPT, suggesting a potential link between allergic reactions and inner ear disorders. A 27-year-old male presented with unilateral hearing loss following an SPT for allergic rhinitis. Audiometric findings revealed SSNHL in the affected ear. Treatment with corticosteroids led to a full recovery of hearing function. This case highlights the rare occurrence of SSNHL possibly triggered by a type 1 allergic reaction to an SPT. Prompt corticosteroid therapy proved effective in restoring hearing. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between allergies and SSNHL and explore alternative treatment options.

Genetic testing for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss in the era of gene therapy.

To summarize indications, methods, and diagnostic yields for genetic testing for pediatric hearing loss. Genetic testing has become a cornerstone of clinical care for children with sensorineural hearing loss. Recent studies have shown the efficacy of gene panels and exome sequencing for any child with sensorineural hearing loss. Recent findings have underscored the importance of a diagnosis in clinical care. Clinical trials for gene therapy for hearing loss have begun. Genetic testing has become critical for personalized care for children with hearing loss. Recent studies have shown a 43% overall diagnostic yield for genetic testing for pediatric hearing loss, though the diagnostic yield may range from 10 to 60% depending on clinical features. Syndromic diagnoses comprise 25% of positive genetic tests for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss. While diagnostic yield is lower for children with unilateral or asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss, the likelihood of syndromic hearing loss finding is higher. An early and accurate genetic diagnosis is required for participating in clinical trials for gene therapy for hearing loss.

The effect of right versus left long-term single-sided deafness on sound source localization

The effect of right versus left long-term single-sided deafness on sound source localization

Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness in Pediatric Patients: A Critical Assessment of Usage Rate.

To assess the usage rate of pediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD). Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary care pediatric referral center. Pediatric patients who underwent CI for SSD. CI with requisite audiometric follow-up. Device use and audiometric testing. Sixty-six patients were implanted for SSD between 8/2015 and 7/2023 at a median age of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 1.7-7.7 yr). The cause of hearing loss was unknown in the majority of cases (28 patients, 42%), with cytomegalovirus being the most common known cause (17 patients, 26%). Hearing loss was prelingual in 38 patients (58%). Post-implantation, 12 patients (18%) were identified as lost to follow-up. For the remaining 54 patients, the median length of audiometric follow-up was 1.4 years (interquartile range, 0.9-2.2 yr). At last evaluation, only 10 of these 54 patients (19%) were designated as users (≥6 h per day), and 13 patients (24%) were designated as limited users (>2 but <6 h per day). Of patients capable of performing speech-in-noise testing (n = 13), 11 patients (85%) showed improvement on BKB-SIN SNR-50 testing with their implant on versus off with a mean improvement of 3 dB. Notably, 4 of these 11 patients (36%) were categorized as nonusers despite this benefit. Despite audiometric benefit from CI in the pediatric SSD population, usage rates over time remain markedly lower than anticipated at a high-volume, well-resourced tertiary care pediatric center. No influencing factors were identified, warranting critical assessment to ensure appropriate resource allocation.

Reliability of the Unilateral Hearing Loss in Youth Instrument for Children With Single-Sided Deafness

Reliability of the Unilateral Hearing Loss in Youth Instrument for Children With Single-Sided Deafness

Anatomy-based fitting improves speech perception in noise for cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness

Abstract Objective To evaluate objective and subjective hearing outcomes in experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness (SSD CI) who used fitting maps created via anatomy-based fitting (ABF) and clinically-based fitting (CBF). Participants Twelve SSD CI users with postlingual hearing loss. Intervention OTOPLAN (Version 3. (MED-EL) was used to determine intracochlear electrode contact positions using post-operative high-resolution flat panel volume computed tomography. From these positions, the corresponding center frequencies and bandwidths were derived for each channel. These were implemented in the clinical fitting software MAESTRO to yield an ABF map individualized to each user. Main Outcome Measures ABF and CBF maps were compared. Objective speech perception in quiet and in noise, binaural effects, and self-perceived sound quality were evaluated. Results Significantly higher speech perception in noise scores were observed with the ABF map compared to the CBF map (mean SRT50: -6.49 vs. -4.8 dB SNR for the S0NCI configuration and − 3.85 vs. -2.75 dB SNR for the S0N0 configuration). Summation and squelch effects were significantly increased with the ABF map (0.86 vs. 0.21 dB SNR for summation and 0.85 vs. -0.09 dB SNR for squelch). No improvement in speech perception in quiet or spatial release from masking were observed with the ABF map. A similar level of self-perceived sound quality was reported for each map. Upon the end of the study, all users opted to keep the ABF map. This preference was independent of the angular insertion depth of the electrode array. Conclusions Experienced SSD CI users preferred using the ABF map, which gave them significant improvements in binaural hearing and some aspects of speech perception.

Cortical mechanisms of across-ear speech integration investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

This study aimed to investigate integration of alternating speech, a stimulus which classically produces a V-shaped speech intelligibility function with minimum at 2-6 Hz in typical-hearing (TH) listeners. We further studied how degraded speech impacts intelligibility across alternating rates (2, 4, 8, and 32 Hz) using vocoded speech, either in the right ear or bilaterally, to simulate single-sided deafness with a cochlear implant (SSD-CI) and bilateral CIs (BiCI), respectively. To assess potential cortical signatures of across-ear integration, we recorded activity in the bilateral auditory cortices (AC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFC) during the task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). For speech intelligibility, the V-shaped function was reproduced only in the BiCI condition; TH (with ceiling scores) and SSD-CI conditions had significantly higher scores across all alternating rates compared to the BiCI condition. For fNIRS, the AC and DLPFC exhibited significantly different activity across alternating rates in the TH condition, with altered activity patterns in both regions in the SSD-CI and BiCI conditions. Our results suggest that degraded speech inputs in one or both ears impact across-ear integration and that different listening strategies were employed for speech integration manifested as differences in cortical activity across conditions.

Vestibular schwannoma-related increased labyrinthine post-gadolinium 3D-FLAIR signal intensity and association with hearing impairment.

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are benign neurogenic tumors commonly associated with progressive unilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and vestibular symptoms. Growing evidence links signal changes in the VS-adjacent labyrinth with sensorineural hearing loss. This study seeks to quantify the association of labyrinthine signal on post-gadolinium 3D-FLAIR imaging correlates with hearing loss and to evaluate potential longitudinal changes over time. Selected patients were identified from a prospectively maintained VS registry. Mean signal intensity ratios of the bilateral labyrinth and pons were measured on 3D-FLAIR post-gadolinium MRI. Correlations with paired audiometric data including pure tone average (PTA), word recognition score (WRS), and AAO-HNS hearing class within one year were evaluated. 125 studies obtained from 2015 to 2022 among 66 patients undergoing observational management for sporadic VS were analyzed. Increased signal intensity was noted of the VS-affected labyrinth/contralateral labyrinth (mean ratio 1.56, SD 0.58). Increased signal intensity was associated with increased PTA on both labyrinthine (correlation coefficient [CC] 0.20, p=0.03) and pontine comparisons (CC 0.24, p=0.006), and with decreased WRS on pontine comparisons (CC -0.18, p=0.04). Increased signal intensity was significantly associated with non-serviceable AAO-HNS C/D hearing when intensities were compared to the pons (p=0.01) but not the contralateral labyrinth (p=0.1). Among 44 patients with available follow-up, no statistically significant associations were identified between audiometric data and signal changes over the same interval. Increased 3D-FLAIR post-gadolinium labyrinthine signal is associated with sensorineural hearing loss; however, its relationship with hearing trajectory remains unclear. Overall findings suggest that while post-gadolinium 3D-FLAIR techniques are sensitive to inner ear involvement associated with VS, the driving mechanism and their temporal relationships with labyrinthine signal intensity and hearing impairment remain unknown. AAO-HNS =American Academy of Otolaryngology -Head and Neck Surgery. BLB =blood-labyrinth barrier. CPA = cerebellopontine angle. IAC = internal auditory canal. PTA = pure tone average; SIR = signal intensity ratio. VS = vestibular schwannoma. WRS = word recognition score.

Improved Binaural Hearing Effects and Sound Source Localization in Listeners with Simulated Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss: Effect of a Bone Conduction Device.

Objectives: It has been proven that patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL) may encounter typical problems associated with asymmetric hearing, especially in challenging listening environments. In this study, we aimed to determine how UCHL affects speech recognition under multisource competing environments and the ability of sound source localization, as well as whether assistance with a bone conduction device (BCD) can confer hearing benefits in such listening tasks. Design: Acquired UCHL was simulated using an earplug combined with an earmuff in 10 listeners (mean age: 29.9 ± 4.77 years) with bilateral normal hearing (NH), and a within-subject repeated-measures design was used to compare hearing results among three listening conditions: NH (both ears open, C1), unilateral plug (UP) (simulated UCHL, C2), and UP + BCD (simulated UCHL aided with a BCD, C3). The speech reception threshold (SRT) of summation, squelch, and head shadow (HS) effects and the mean absolute error of sound source localization were used as markers for binaural hearing abilities. Results: BCD assistance (C3) improved the summation and HS effects in all listeners with simulated UCHL, resulting in a lower (i.e., better) SRT than that observed in C2; however, no significant differences in squelch effects were observed between C2 and C3. Notably, most listeners exhibited more accurate sound source localization in C3 than in C2. Further, BCD assistance mainly improved localization accuracy when the noise stimuli were presented at low intensities and on the hearing-impaired (plugged) side, suggesting that the benefits of BCD for sound localization are not based on the reacquisition of binaural processing. Conclusions: The current results have clinical implications for the promotion of BCDs in patients with UCHL, especially those with acquired UCHL who are unable to undergo surgery.

Factors influencing auditory brainstem response changes in infants

BackgroundTo elucidate the factors influencing auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold improvement in infants. MethodsThis retrospective study included 626 infants who underwent ABR at the our Health and Medical Center between 2016 and 2020. Preliminary assessment indicated that 352 infants had an ABR threshold ≥40 dBnHL in both ears. A second ABR examination was conducted 5 months after delivery. The participants were divided into the improved (improvement ≥20 dBnHL) and unchanged (improvement <20 dBnHL) groups. The associations between risk factors were evaluated. Furthermore, we measured and compared the latencies of waves I, III, and V between participants with normal hearing and those in the improved and unchanged groups. ResultsThe improved and unchanged groups consisted of 185 and 167 participants, respectively. ABR deterioration occurred in one infant with unilateral congenital cytomegalovirus-associated hearing loss. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of otitis media with effusion and Down syndrome were factors contributing to ABR threshold improvement. In the ABR waveform analysis, patients in the improved group who had otitis media with effusion exhibited prolonged latencies of waves I, III, and V. Conversely, patients in the unchanged group who had Down syndrome showed shortened I–V interval. ConclusionsHalf of the infants tested the second time showed improvement in ABR threshold. Children with congenital syndromes (such as Down syndrome) or otitis media with effusion should undergo a second ABR examination or other auditory assessments to ensure an accurate diagnosis of hearing loss.