Unfavorable Intermediate-risk Research Articles

Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer and Surgical Guidance: A Prospective Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Survivors of surgically managed prostate cancer may experience urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Our aim was to determine if 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography CT (PSMA-PET) in addition to multiparametric (mp) MRI scans improved surgical decision-making for nonnerve-sparing or nerve-sparing approach. We prospectively enrolled 50 patients at risk for extraprostatic extension (EPE) who were scheduled for prostatectomy. After mpMRI and PSMA-PET images were read for EPE prediction, surgeons prospectively answered questionnaires based on mpMRI and PSMA-PET scans on the decision for nerve-sparing or nonnerve-sparing approach. Final whole-mount pathology was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and McNemar's test was used to compare imaging modalities. The median age and PSA were 61.5 years and 7.0 ng/dL. The sensitivity for EPE along the posterior neurovascular bundle was higher for PSMA-PET than mpMRI (86% vs 57%, P = .03). For MRI, the specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curves were 77%, 40%, 87%, and 0.67, and for PSMA-PET were 73%, 46%, 95%, and 0.80. PSMA-PET and mpMRI reads differed on 27 nerve bundles, with PSMA-PET being correct in 20 cases and MRI being correct in 7 cases. Surgeons predicted correct nerve-sparing approach 74% of the time with PSMA-PET scan in addition to mpMRI compared to 65% with mpMRI alone (P = .01). PSMA-PET scan was more sensitive than mpMRI for EPE along the neurovascular bundles and improved surgical decisions for nerve-sparing approach. Further study of PSMA-PET for surgical guidance is warranted in the unfavorable intermediate-risk or worse populations. NCT04936334.

High-volume prostate biopsy core involvement is not associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence following 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy monotherapy

PurposePercentage of positive cores involved on a systemic prostate biopsy has been established as a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcomes and is a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) independent parameter for unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Most data from a radiation standpoint was published in an era of conventional fractionation. We explore whether the higher biological dose delivered with SBRT can mitigate this risk factor.MethodsA large single institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with 5-fraction SBRT without ADT. Pathology results were reviewed to determine detailed core involvement as well as Gleason score (GS). High-volume biopsy core involvement was defined as ≥ 50%. Weighted Gleason core involvement was reviewed, giving higher weight to higher-grade cancer. The PSA kinetics and oncologic outcomes were analyzed for association with core involvement.ResultsFrom 2009 to 2018, 1590 patients were identified who underwent SBRT for localized PCa. High-volume core involvement was a relatively rare event observed in 19% of our cohort, which was observed more in patients with small prostates (p < 0.0001) and/or intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.005). Higher PSA nadir was observed in those patients with low-volume core involvement within the intermediate-risk cohort (p = 0.004), which was confirmed when core involvement was analyzed as a continuous variable weighted by Gleason score (p = 0.049). High-volume core involvement was not associated with biochemical progression (p = 0.234).ConclusionsWith a median follow-up of over 4 years, biochemical progression was not associated with pretreatment high-volume core involvement for patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT alone. In the era of prostate SBRT and MRI-directed prostate biopsies, the use of high-volume core involvement as an independent predictor of unfavorable intermediate risk disease should be revisited.

Updated 5-year results for short course abiraterone acetate and LHRH agonist for unfavorable intermediate and favorable high-risk prostate cancer.

Combined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) improves outcomes for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Treatment intensification with abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AAP) provides additional benefit for high-risk disease. We previously reported 3-year outcomes of a single-arm prospective multicenter trial (AbiRT trial) of 33 patients with unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) and favorable high risk (FHR) prostate cancer undergoing short course, combination therapy with ADT, AAP, and RT. Here we report the final analysis demonstrating a high rate of testosterone recovery (97%) and excellent biochemical progression-free survival (97%) at 5 years. These data support comparative prospective studies of shorter, more potent ADT courses in favorable high-risk prostate cancer.

Predictors of PSMA positivity at initial staging of prostate cancer.

283 Background: PSMA-based imaging improves detection of metastatic disease for initial staging of men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) with higher accuracy compared to conventional imaging. PSMA imaging is now being increasingly adopted for initial local and distant metastatic staging. We sought to determine the contribution of clinical and pathological factors associated with PSMA positive nodal or metastatic disease. Methods: We retrospectively identified 404 men diagnosed with PCa who underwent initial staging with Gallium-68 or F-18 piflufolastat (DCFPyL) PSMA PET/CT across our eleven-hospital system from July 2021-December 2022. Patient characteristics, including demographic, clinical, pathologic, and imaging variables were obtained. PSMA positivity representing a suspicious nodal or distant lesion was determined based on radiology reports, histopathology, and other imaging modalities, and equivocal or likely benign lesions were counted as negative. Patients with prior diagnosis (&gt;6 months) of PCa (n=42) or incomplete clinical history (n=22) were excluded. Clinical variables were compared with Wilcoxon Rank Test, Chi square, and Fishers’ exact test as well as univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Number of risk factors for patients with unfavorable intermediate or very high risk disease was also examined. PSA was log transformed. Statistical significance was defined as p&lt;0.05. Results: 103/340 patients (30.3%) had PSMA imaging findings concerning for nodal or distant metastatic disease. Patients with positive finding were less likely to be Black, and had higher PSA, biopsy Gleason Grade Group, and higher presumptive NCCN risk. Stratifying by pre-scan NCCN risk group, PSMA positivity was observed in no patients with favorable intermediate risk PCa (n=17), 9.8% (12/123) with unfavorable intermediate risk PCa, 29% (25/86) with high risk PCa, and 58% (66/114) with very high risk PCa. Stratifying by number of risk factors, there were significant differences in scan positivity comparing unfavorable intermediate risk disease with 1 vs ≥2 risk factors (4.2% vs 17%, p=0.03) and very high risk disease with 1 risk vs ≥2 risk factors (49% vs 72%, p=0.01). On multivariable analysis, NCCN classification stratified by risk factors was associated with PSMA positivity while Black race was inversely associated (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11, 0.82, p=0.03). Conclusions: Initial staging with PSMA PET/CT identified local regional or metastatic disease in 30% of PCa patients. A substantial proportion of unfavorable intermediate risk men were N1 or M1 based on PSMA positivity, particularly those with multiple unfavorable intermediate risk features. The clinical benefit for PSMA PET/CT in patients with favorable intermediate risk PCa is low. Limitations include retrospective design (including possible selection bias for patients with equivocal lesions on conventional imaging) and a limited number of black men in the cohort.

Patterns of PSMA PET/CT scan usage for initial staging and recurrence in a multi-centered hospital system.

36 Background: PET PSMA-based imaging for prostate cancer staging has been approved since late 2020 and was widely available in our medical system by July 2021. We sought to examine the patterns of use of PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging for staging since this time. Methods: We retrospectively identified men who were diagnosed with presumptive NCCN unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR), high risk, or very high risk (VHR) and men who underwent staging work-up for biochemical recurrence (BCR) from July 2021 – June 2023. Patient clinical, pathological, and imaging variables were collected. Sufficient conventional imaging for initial staging was defined as the use of a bone scan and one or more of an MRI or CT scan. The date of staging was determined by the initiation of staging with conventional imaging or the date of PSMA scan if used. Results: In the study period, 899 men were diagnosed with presumptive NCCN UIR-VHR disease. Among these individuals 32% (290/899) underwent no or insufficient staging, 26% (230/899) underwent staging with conventional imaging only, and 42% (379/899) underwent initial staging evaluations that included PET PSMA. The frequency of PET PSMA used for initial staging increased from 24% (20/82) to 80% (167/208) over the 2-year study period. 1173 men with biochemical recurrence who underwent a staging work-up were identified. Median PSA of these men was 1.37 ng/mL (IQR 0.23, 6.59 ng/mL). The frequency of PET PSMA imaging increased in these men from 91% (225/246) to 98% (296/303) over the 2-year study period. When ordering both PSMA and conventional imaging for initial staging, providers tended to order PSMA scans after initial conventional imaging orders (72%) rather than before (18%) or on the same day (11%). Conclusions: The use of PSMA PET/CT imaging rose since its implementation in our system in July 2021 with PSMA PET being utilized in 80% of patients being initially staged and 98% of those staged at BCR. Conventional imaging and Axumin PET are rarely used in BCR. If both PET PSMA and conventional imaging were ordered for initial staging, PET PSMA was typically performed after conventional imaging. Growing data may inform best sequencing and use of conventional imaging in the PSMA-PET era.

Update from the PSMA-dRT trial: A randomized phase III trial of PSMA-PET prior to definitive radiation therapy for unfavorable intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer.

291 Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has superior diagnostic accuracy for detecting regional and distant metastases compared to conventional imaging (CT, bone scan, and MRI) in men with prostate cancer. This has the potential to guide definitive radiation therapy (dRT) patient selection and planning. Whether the use of improved diagnostic accuracy imaging improves patient outcomes remains to be demonstrated in clinical trials. Methods: This multi-institutional phase III randomized clinical trial (PSMA-dRT, NCT04457245) was designed to randomize 312 men with unfavorable intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer 1.08:1 between receiving (n=162) and not receiving (n=150) a PSMA PET/CT prior to starting dRT. Treating radiation oncologists incorporated the PSMA PET/CT into radiotherapy planning. All other imaging modalities were allowed in the control arm. There were no prespecified androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or dRT dose and volumes protocols. The primary endpoint was 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 54 patients were randomized between November 2020 and December 2021 (25 to PSMA PET/CT and 29 to control). The trial closed early following FDA approval and insurance coverage of PSMA PET/CT, since treatment without PSMA PET/CT in the control group was no longer acceptable for many patients and physicians. Among patients staged with PSMA PET/CT in the intervention group, 14 patients (58.3%) had localized miT2b-cN0M0 disease, 6 (25.0%) had locally advanced disease (miT3a-bN0M0), 3 (12.5%) had regional disease (miN1M0), and 1 (4.2%) had nodal and distant disease (miN1M1b). Four patients (16.7%) were upstaged relative to their staging at time of randomization. All three patients with miN1M0 disease received pelvic lymph node irradiation as part of their dRT course. The patient with miN1M1b disease received upfront ADT with abiraterone acetate and prednisone followed by consolidative radiotherapy to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. With a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range: 17.6-26.3 months), there were no cases of biochemical failure (PSA &gt;2 ng/mL above nadir), radiographic or biopsy-proven recurrence, salvage therapy, or prostate cancer death in either arm. Two-year PFS was 93.8% in the PSMA PET/CT arm (due to 2 non prostate cancer deaths) and 100% in the control arm. There was no significant difference in PFS between the PSMA PET/CT and control arms ( P=0.13). Conclusions: PSMA PET/CT upstaged 17% of patients compared to prior baseline staging, which allowed for more accurate treatment planning. Due to early termination, this trial was underpowered to assess the effect of PSMA PET/CT on PFS. PSMA-dRT is currently under submission for complete enrollment and data pooling at German sites. Clinical trial information: NCT04457245 .

A phase 2 study of neoadjuvant PARP inhibition followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer with BRCA1/2 gene alterations (NePtune).

TPS353 Background: Patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer have an increased risk of relapse following RP. Approximately 6% of patients with high-risk disease harbor germline alterations in the DNA repair pathway, of which BRCA1/2 alterations are the most common. Patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations have higher rates of aggressive disease, distant metastases, and worse survival compared to non-carriers. Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor which demonstrates improved overall survival in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer with BRCA1/2 germline and somatic alterations. Additionally, olaparib has demonstrated improved invasive disease-free survival as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 HER-2 negative breast cancer. Novel, multimodal treatment strategies for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer with germline or somatic BRCA1/2 may improve outcomes for these patients. Methods: We designed a multicenter phase 2 single arm study evaluating neoadjuvant olaparib in combination with a LHRH agonist for 6 months followed by RP. Eligible patients include those with a Gleason score ≥4+3=7, PSA &gt;20 ng/mL or T3 disease (by DRE or prostate MRI) and lymph node &lt;20 mm. Patients with intraductal carcinoma are eligible independent of Gleason score, PSA, or T stage. Patients must have a germline or somatic BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations identified on standard of care molecular profiling. Eligible patients receive olaparib 300 mg by mouth twice daily and a LHRH agonist for 6 months followed by RP. The primary endpoint is the rate of a pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimum residual disease (MRD, tumor ≤5 mm) as determined by central pathology review. Secondary endpoints include PSA response, surgical staging at RP, positive margin rate, time to testosterone recovery, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include quality of life assessment, proportion of downstaging on multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI), correlation of mpMRI with pathologic response, and tissue based molecular predictors of response and resistance. The sample size was estimated based a Binomial Exact test to assess the null hypothesis of the pCR/MRD rate ≤10% with one-sided 5% significance level. If the observed rate from this study is ≥32.5%, to have 90% power to conclude that the pCR/MRD rate is above 10%, a total of 30 patients will be enrolled. We can reject the null hypothesis if there are at least 7 responses. This trial is enrolling patients through the Hoosier Cancer Research Network. The study is activated at the University of California San Diego and University of Pennsylvania. Sites pending activation include: Johns Hopkins Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University, and University of Buffalo. Clinical trial information: NCT05498272 .

Development and Optimization of a Subtraction-Normalized Immunocyte Profiling Signature for Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Risk Stratification.

Less invasive decision support tools are desperately needed to identify occult high-risk disease in men with prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS). For a variety of reasons, many men on AS with low- or intermediate-risk disease forgo the necessary repeat surveillance biopsies needed to identify potentially higher-risk PCa. Here, we describe the development of a blood-based immunocyte transcriptomic signature to identify men harboring occult aggressive PCa. We then validate it on a biopsy-positive population with the goal of identifying men who should not be on AS and confirm those men with indolent disease who can safely remain on AS. This model uses subtraction-normalized immunocyte transcriptomic profiles to risk-stratify men with PCa who could be candidates for AS. Men were eligible for enrollment in the study if they were determined by their physician to have a risk profile that warranted prostate biopsy. Both training (n = 1017) and validation cohort (n = 1198) populations had blood samples drawn coincident to their prostate biopsy. Purified CD2+ and CD14+ immune cells were obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and RNA was extracted and sequenced. To avoid overfitting and unnecessary complexity, a regularized regression model was built on the training cohort to predict PCa aggressiveness based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network PCa guidelines. This model was then validated on an independent cohort of biopsy-positive men only, using National Comprehensive Cancer Network unfavorable intermediate risk and worse as an aggressiveness outcome, identifying patients who were not appropriate for AS. The best final model for the AS setting was obtained by combining an immunocyte transcriptomic profile based on 2 cell types with PSA density and age, reaching an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.77). The model significantly outperforms (P < .001) PSA density as a biomarker, which has an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.73). This model yields an individualized patient risk score with 90% negative predictive value and 50% positive predictive value. While further validation in an intended-use cohort is needed, the immunocyte transcriptomic model offers a promising tool for risk stratification of individual patients who are being considered for AS.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy boost for unfavorable prostate cancer: five-year outcomes

PurposeIntensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with brachytherapy boost for unfavorable prostate cancer has been shown to improve biochemical relapse-free survival compared to IMRT alone. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a less-invasive alternative to brachytherapy. Early outcomes utilizing SBRT boost suggest low rates of high-grade toxicity with a maintained patient-reported quality of life. Here, we report the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) of patients treated with IMRT plus SBRT boost.Materials and methodsBetween 2008 and 2020, 255 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were treated with robotic SBRT (19.5 Gy in three fractions) followed by fiducial-guided IMRT (45–50.4 Gy) according to an institutional protocol. For the first year, the patient’s PSA level was monitored every 3 months, biannually for 2 years, and annually thereafter. Failure was defined as nadir + 2 ng/mL or a rising PSA with imaging suggestive of recurrence. Detection of recurrence also included digital rectal examination and imaging studies, such as MRI, CT, PET/CT, and/or bone scans. PFS and PCSS were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsThe median follow-up period was 71 months. According to the NCCN risk classification, 5% (13/255) of the patients had favorable intermediate-risk disease, 23% (57/255) had unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, 40% (102/255) had high-risk disease, and 32% (83/255) had very high-risk disease. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered to 80% (204/255) of the patients. Elective pelvic lymph node IMRT was performed in 28 (10%) patients. The PFS for all patients at 5 years was 81% (favorable intermediate risk, 91%; unfavorable intermediate risk, 89%; high-risk, 78%; and very-high risk, 72%). The PCSS for all patients at 5 years was 97% (favorable intermediate risk, 100%; unfavorable intermediate risk, 100%; high risk, 100%; and very high risk, 89%).ConclusionThe incidence of failure following IMRT plus SBRT for unfavorable prostate cancer remains low at 5 years.

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer through urine metabolomic signatures: A large-scale validated study

PurposeCurrently, there are no accurate markers for predicting potentially lethal prostate cancer (PC) before biopsy. This study aimed to develop urine tests to predict clinically significant PC (sPC) in men at risk.MethodsUrine samples from 928 men, namely, 660 PC patients and 268 benign subjects, were analyzed by gas chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrophotometry (GC/Q-TOF MS) metabolomic profiling to construct four predictive models. Model I discriminated between PC and benign cases. Models II, III, and GS, respectively, predicted sPC in those classified as having favorable intermediate risk or higher, unfavorable intermediate risk or higher (according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groupings), and a Gleason sum (GS) of ≥ 7. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).ResultsIn Models I, II, III, and GS, the best AUCs (0.94, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively; training cohort, N = 603) involved 26, 24, 26, and 22 metabolites, respectively. The addition of five clinical risk factors (serum prostate-specific antigen, patient age, previous negative biopsy, digital rectal examination, and family history) significantly improved the AUCs of the models (0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.87, respectively). At 90% sensitivity, 48%, 47%, 50%, and 36% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. These models were successfully validated against an independent validation cohort (N = 325). Decision curve analysis showed a significant clinical net benefit with each combined model at low threshold probabilities. Models II and III were more robust and clinically relevant than Model GS.ConclusionThis urine test, which combines urine metabolic markers and clinical factors, may be used to predict sPC and thereby inform the necessity of biopsy in men with an elevated PC risk.

Risk Factors Predicting Relapse 10 Years Following Extreme Dose-Escalated SBRT for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Is De-Intensification Feasible in Unfavorable Subgroups?

Adding short-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiotherapy is recommended in unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) prostate cancer (PCa). Data supporting the addition of ADT to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in intermediate-risk (IR) patients are limited. Given ADT has well-documented toxicities, we sought to identify the UIR prognostic factors that predict for relapse following SBRT without ADT. We combined results from two mature multicenter trials to determine if extreme dose-escalated SBRT yielded UIR subgroups in which the omission of ADT may be considered. Between 2008 and 2011, two prospective national trials enlisted 39 centers to enroll 285 patients with IR PCa: 182 had Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) and 103 had MSK UIF PCa. All were treated with a non-coplanar robotic SBRT platform using real-time tracking of implanted fiducials. Two dose regimens were used: 40Gy in 5 fractions of 8Gy, and 38Gy in 4 fractions of 9.5Gy. ADT was not allowed. Univariate and multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed for relapse free survival (RFS): relapse included pathologic or radiographic failure, initiation of salvage or systemic therapy, or biochemical relapse by the nadir + 2 definition. Insufficient events prevented similar analyses for local control, metastasis-free and PCa-specific survival. Examined risk factors included dose regimen, clinical T-stage, Gleason score, pre-treatment PSA, % positive biopsy cores, and number of unfavorable risk factors (URFs). All reported rates are actuarial, using Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was 8.1 years. 71 patients were followed 10 years. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of toxicity, local failure, RFS, overall nor metastasis-free survival between the two dose regimens. For the entire group, 10-year overall survival was 82.9%, RFS was 83.2%, and the local failure rate was 3.6%. On univariate analysis, primary Gleason pattern 4 (PGP4) and >2 URFs predicted for RFS. On multivariate analysis, only PGP4 (hazard ratio: 3.71, p = 0.0053) was statistically significant. Examining the UIR subgroup, the only predictor for RFS was PGP4 (HR: 3.64, p = 0.0253). 10-year RFS was 88.4% for FIR and 89.1% for UIR without PGP4; this fell to 58.5% in patients with a PGP4. Following dose-escalated SBRT monotherapy, 10-year RFS rates were favorable in UIR patients without PGP4. Extreme dose escalation appeared to effectively address UIR factors correlating with tumor bulk (i.e., CS T2b, >50% cores+, PSA 10-20), but was less effective with biologically aggressive pathology (PGP4). A randomized trial, ideally including genomic classification, would be necessary to determine if dose-escalated SBRT allows de-intensification (omission of ADT) in such biologically less aggressive UIR subgroups. The high relapse rate observed in UIR patients with PGP4 affirms the need for adjuvant ADT in this subgroup.

Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Different High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Dose Regimens for Favorable and Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

To present long-term efficacy outcomes of prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy monotherapy using 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 27 Gy in 2 fractions for men with favorable and unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. Patients treated with HDR brachytherapy monotherapy for NCCN favorable (FIR) or unfavorable (UIR) intermediate risk prostate cancer from 1999-2020 were identified in a prospectively maintained, single institution database. Patients with less than two years of follow-up and those treated with single fraction HDR brachytherapy were excluded. Biochemical failure was determined using Phoenix criteria. 10-year biochemical control (BC), local control (LC), and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Two hundred sixty-seven patients were included. One hundred eighty-nine had FIR and 78 had UIR prostate cancer, with median follow-up of 9.6 years and 7.2 years, respectively. Of the 189 patients with FIR prostate cancer, 59 (31.2%) received 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 26 (13.7%) received 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 104 (55.0%) received 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Of the 78 patients with UIR prostate cancer, 20 (25.6%) received 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 11 (14.1%) received 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 47 (60.2%) received 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Date ranges of treatment for the respective fractionation schedules were 1999-2010, 2007-2016, and 2009-2020. Upfront androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given to 12 (6.3%) patients with FIR and 10 (12.8%) patients with UIR. 10-year rates of BC for FIR and UIR patients were 90.1% and 78.8% (p = 0.004), respectively. 10-year rates of LC were 92.4% and 85.0% (p = 0.06), respectively. 10-year rates of DM were 1.9% and 4.7% (p = 0.12), respectively. For FIR patients, 10-year BC rates were 96.2% for patients receiving 38 Gy in 4 fractions vs. 86.3% (p = 0.07) for those treated with the 2-fraction regimens, while 10-year LC rates were 97.9% and 89.0% (p = 0.049), respectively. Within the UIR subset, the 10-year BC rates for patients receiving 38 Gy in 4 fractions and patients receiving treatment in 2 fractions were 95.0% and 70.6% (p = 0.038). 10-year LC rates were 100% and 77.8% (p = 0.045), respectively. 10-year BC rates by treatment schedule are shown in the table below. HDR brachytherapy monotherapy results in excellent long-term local control for intermediate risk prostate cancer. Improvements in biochemical and local disease control for patients treated with 38 Gy in 4 fractions warrants consideration of prospective study of optimal treatment dosing regimens.

High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy Alone for Treatment of Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.

To demonstrate the feasibility of high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) as monotherapy for unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) prostate cancer by comparing survival outcomes of HDR BT alone against external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) + HDR BT boost, +/- androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) using propensity-score matched (PSM) data. This retrospective study queried two data registries collecting patient data from 1991 to present. 633 patients with UIR prostate cancer treated with HDR BT alone, HDR BT+EBRT or HDR+EBRT+ADT were included. HDR BT patients received 42-45Gy/6 fractions (fx) or 27 Gy/2 fx. For HDR BT+EBRT, the HDR dose was 20-24 Gy/2 fx, 24 Gy/4 fx, or 15 Gy/1 fx. EBRT patients received 45 Gy/25 fx to the prostate +/- pelvic nodes. GU/GI toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Time-to-event analyses were carried out to evaluate the relationship between treatments and five primary endpoints of interest: freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBC), freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM), freedom from local failure (FFLF), cancer specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) at 5 years. PSM was performed with one-to-n matching. Logistic regression was used to estimate the respective propensity scores. The five potential confounders identified were T-stage, Gleason score, pre-treatment PSA, age, and percent positive cores. Balance was checked using the standardized mean difference of covariates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted on the matched data. Toxicity analysis was performed via association between a change in pre- and post-treatment GU/GI toxicity status and the treatment group, as well as incidence of post-treatment severe GI/GU toxicity (grade 3 or higher) and the treatment group. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test comparison between the three cohorts demonstrated no significant difference in all survival outcomes FFBC, FFDM, FFLF, CSS, OS (p = 0.15, 0.19, 0.29, 0.57, 0.28, respectively). Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard regression showed no differences in HR for FFBC and OS (p = 0.95, 0.11) with addition of EBRT, or with EBRT+ADT (p = 0.17, 0.24); no fit was obtainable for FFDM, CSS, FFLF. Toxicities between the three cohorts were not significantly different when comparing post-treatment and baseline GI/GU symptoms (p = 0.53/1). No Grade 2 or 3 GI toxicities were identified, while 8%/1% HDR patients, 10%/1% HDR+EBRT patients, and 12%/2% HDR+EBRT+ADT patients experienced Grade 2/3 GU toxicities. The incidence of grade 3 or higher GU toxicities between the three groups was not significantly different (p = 0.91). This propensity-score matched study demonstrates the feasibility of HDR BT alone for effective treatment of UIR prostate cancer when compared to HDR+EBRT or HDR+EBRT+ADT, while potentially minimizing the added toxicities of EBRT and the undesirable side effect profile of ADT.

Focal Boosted IMRT Treatment of Prostate Cancer to 84 Gy in 28 Fractions: Preliminary Clinical Outcomes and Dosimetry

The FLAME trial reported that focal boosting of prostate tumor to 95 Gy in 35 fractions improves biochemical control. However, this treatment is not commonly used in the United States. We investigated a focally boosted treatment of 84 Gy in 28 fractions (EQD2 108 Gy, BED 252 Gy). Between 2019-2022, men with unfavorable intermediate risk (uIR) and high risk (HR) prostate cancer were enrolled on a prospective registry and received a novel IMRT regimen. The dose levels were 84 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) as defined on mpMRI (T2W and ADC) with no added margin, 70 Gy to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles, and optional 50.4 Gy to elective pelvic lymph nodes (all 28 fractions). Patients received fiducial markers and hydrogel spacer. The treatment planning goal was to cover 95% of the GTV at 84 Gy, and also meet the target and normal tissue dosimetry criteria of the hypofractionated treatment arm of NRG-GU005. VMAT was used for treatment delivery. ADT was given at the discretion of the treating physician. A total of 20 men were included in the study, 2 (10%) uIR and 18 (90%) HR. 9 (45%) tumors were GS 7, 7 (35%) were GS 8, and 4 (20%) were GS 9. There were 13 (65%) stage cT1, 4 (20%) cT2 and 3 (15%) cT3. One (5%) patient received short term ADT, 18 (95%) long term ADT, and 1 (5%) refused ADT. 18 (90%) men received elective nodal radiation. The mean baseline PSA was 25.1 (range 4.2-73.4). The median baseline IPSS score was 11.1 (IQR 4.5-12), and 4 patients had severe baseline urinary symptoms (IPSS ≥20). The mean baseline prostate volume was 57.4 cc (range 26.8-198.3). The mean volume of the 84 Gy boost target was 7.1 cc (range 2.3-15.0) and the mean proportion of the prostate boosted was 14.8% (range 2% - 47%). There were 10 (50%) men with 1 boost target, 6 (30%) with two, 3 (15%) with three, and 1 (5%) had 4 boost targets. Targets were located in peripheral zone (85%), transition zone (30%), and central zone (5%). Patients met all per-protocol normal tissue criteria of NRG-GU005, except for bladder D0.03cc. The mean±SD (Gy) rectum D15%, D25%, and D30% were 51±5, 45±5, 42±4. The mean±SD (Gy) bladder D0.03cc, D30%, D50% were 79±4, 50±8, 38±10. At a median follow up time of 21.3 months (range 7.1-38.2), no patients have developed biochemical progression, local recurrence, distant progression, or death from prostate cancer. One patient died at 18 months from metastatic colorectal cancer, unrelated to prostate cancer treatment. Acute grade 1-2 GU toxicity occurred in 13 (65%) patients, and acute grade 1-2 GI toxicity occurred in 4 (20%) patients. No patients developed grade 3+ acute or late GU or GI toxicity. Two patients required temporary foley catheter for obstruction during RT, and both had IPSS >20 at baseline. The patient who refused ADT had a PSA bounce of magnitude 2.2 ng/mL at 14 months, PSA values declined without additional treatment. A novel 28-fraction focal boosted IMRT treatment is feasible and has an acceptable early toxicity profile. Oncologic results are promising but require longer follow up.

Cross-Comparison Individual Patient Level Analysis of Three Gene Expression Signatures in Localized Prostate in over 50,000 Men

Risk stratification guides the management of localized prostate cancer. Multiple commercial gene expression biomarkers have been developed to improve estimates of prognosis, however the 22-gene Decipher genomic classifier (22-GC) is the only test with level 1 evidence supporting its use per NCCN guidelines. It is unknown whether other commercial signatures, Oncotype (GPS) or Prolaris (CCP), are sufficiently correlated to negate the differences in evidence supporting these commercial tests. Herein, we aim to perform a cross-comparison of these signatures in a large cohort of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who underwent whole transcriptome gene expression microarray analysis on their primary tumor biopsy specimen were included. The 22-GC score was calculated by Veracyte using a commercially locked model. Individual genes in each of the GPS and CCP gene signatures were identified, and the gene weights in each signature were retrained for prediction of metastasis in a multi-institutional cohort of 1,574 men with long-term outcome data. This was performed to improve correlation performance of GPS and CCP given only the 22-GC was trained for prediction of metastasis. For each of the three signatures, both continuous and categorical scores were calculated. Linear regression and spearman correlations were calculated both on univariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for age, grade group, PSA, and T-stage. A total of 50,881 patients were included (15,379 (30.2%) NCCN low-risk, 14,773 (29.0%) favorable intermediate-risk, 15,544 (30.5%) unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 5,185 (10.2%) high/very high-risk) with a median age of 68 years, and a median PSA of 6.2 ng/mL. On linear regression, the GPS model had poor goodness-of-fit to the 22-GC with an R2 of 0.36, as did the CCP model to the 22-GC with an R2 of 0.32. For CCP, the linear sum of the 31-genes was also tested but had inferior performance (R2 0.28) compared to the reoptimized CCP model. Results were similar on multivariable analysis adjusting for age, PSA, clinical stage and grade group. Spearman correlation between the continuous GPS model scores and the 22-GC was moderate at 0.59, as was the correlation between CCP model and the 22-GC of 0.54. CCP is a measure of proliferation, but in 22-GC high-risk patients, the majority (64.1%) of patients had low-average proliferation and only 35.9% had high proliferation, potentially explaining the lack of strong correlation. There is minimal to moderate correlation between the 22-GC and GPS or CCP gene expression signatures tested. Therefore, these tests should not be viewed as interchangeable, and utilization should be based on the level of evidence supporting each gene expression biomarker.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use among Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy across a Statewide Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium

For men with intermediate (INT) risk prostate cancer, the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) reduces risk of PSA failure, distant metastasis, and cancer-related mortality. Moreover, the relative reduction in cancer-related adverse outcomes with ADT use appears consistent across all INT risk subgroups. The absolute benefit of ADT, however, varies by baseline risk. In contemporary practice, it is unknown which clinical factors are most strongly associated with intended ADT use. Therefore, we sought to identify such factors within the diverse practices of the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC). Patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive radiation therapy were enrolled from 6/9/20 to 11/4/22 (n = 599). Standardized patient, physician, and physicist forms were used to collect baseline and follow-up information. Intended ADT use, defined by the treating physician, was prospectively collected and is the primary outcome of this analysis. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) associations with patient (age, race, comorbidities), tumor (T stage, Gleason, percent cores positive, and PSA), and practice-related (academic vs private) factors were performed. In addition, advanced modality testing (PET, MRI, and genomic classifiers) was available as of March 2021, and subgroup analysis were performed where appropriate. A total 351 patients across 26 centers were enrolled with INT risk disease. ADT use was intended for 46% of men (n = 162/351) which differed by men with NCCN favorable INT (21%, n = 22/105) vs unfavorable INT risk disease (57%, n = 140/246), p<0.001. Sixty two percent (n = 100/162) had an intended ADT duration of 4-6 months and 21% (n = 34/162) had ≥12 months. Older age was associated with ADT use (70 vs 67, p < 0.01); there were no significant differences by race or comorbidities number. MVA showed Gleason 4+3 (OR 4.61 [2.91 - 7.42]) and > = 50% positive cores (2.56 [1.52 - 4.37]) were significantly associated with ADT use. No significant differences were noted based on practice setting. Pelvic MRI was obtained for 71% of men (n = 197/279), genomic classifiers in 47% (n = 130/279), and PET in 2% (n = 6/282). In the subset with MRI (n = 197), adverse features (ECE, SVI, or equivocal LNs) were associated with intended ADT use (OR 3.0 [1.4 - 7.1]) after adjustment for NCCN favorable/unfavorable INT risk classification. Within a state-wide consortium, intended ADT use for intermediate prostate cancer is most strongly associated with Gleason score, ≥50% positive cores, NCCN unfavorable intermediate risk classification, and adverse features on MRI. Nearly half of men had genomic classifier testing underscoring the importance ongoing trials such as NRG/GU 010.

European Association of Nuclear Medicine Focus 5: Consensus on Molecular Imaging and Theranostics in Prostate Cancer

BackgroundIn prostate cancer (PCa), questions remain on indications for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and PSMA radioligand therapy, integration of advanced imaging in nomogram-based decision-making, dosimetry, and development of new theranostic applications. ObjectiveWe aimed to critically review developments in molecular hybrid imaging and systemic radioligand therapy, to reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the current state of the art in PCa. Design, setting, and participantsThe results of a systematic literature search informed a two-round Delphi process with a panel of 28 PCa experts in medical or radiation oncology, urology, radiology, medical physics, and nuclear medicine. The results were discussed and ratified in a consensus meeting. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisForty-eight statements were scored on a Likert agreement scale and six as ranking options. Agreement statements were analysed using the RAND appropriateness method. Ranking statements were analysed using weighted summed scores. Results and limitationsAfter two Delphi rounds, there was consensus on 42/48 (87.5%) of the statements. The expert panel recommends PSMA PET to be used for staging the majority of patients with unfavourable intermediate and high risk, and for restaging of suspected recurrent PCa. There was consensus that oligometastatic disease should be defined as up to five metastases, even using advanced imaging modalities. The group agreed that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA should not be administered only after progression to cabazitaxel and that [223Ra]RaCl2 remains a valid therapeutic option in bone-only metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Uncertainty remains on various topics, including the need for concordant findings on both [18F]FDG and PSMA PET prior to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy. ConclusionsThere was a high proportion of agreement among a panel of experts on the use of molecular imaging and theranostics in PCa. Although consensus statements cannot replace high-certainty evidence, these can aid in the interpretation and dissemination of best practice from centres of excellence to the wider clinical community. Patient summaryThere are situations when dealing with prostate cancer (PCa) where both the doctors who diagnose and track the disease development and response to treatment, and those who give treatments are unsure about what the best course of action is. Examples include what methods they should use to obtain images of the cancer and what to do when the cancer has returned or spread. We reviewed published research studies and provided a summary to a panel of experts in imaging and treating PCa. We also used the research summary to develop a questionnaire whereby we asked the experts to state whether or not they agreed with a list of statements. We used these results to provide guidance to other health care professionals on how best to image men with PCa and what treatments to give, when, and in what order, based on the information the images provide.

5-Years Analysis of Effectivity and Toxicity of Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis.

We retrospectively analyzed the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and occurrence of late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy. In the period from January 2013 to June 2018, 853 patients with prostate cancer were treated with an ultra-hypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE/five fractions). The mean PSA value was 6.7 (0.7-19.7) µg/L. There were 318 (37.3%), 314 (36.8%), and 221 (25.9%) patients at low (LR), favorable intermediate (F-IR), and unfavorable intermediate risk (U-IR), respectively. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 197 (23.1%) patients, and 7 (0.8%) patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. The whole group of patients reached median follow-up time at 62.7 months, and their mean age was 64.8 (40.0-85.7) years. The bDFS rates and late toxicity profile were evaluated. Median treatment time was 10 (7-38) days. Estimated 5-year bDFS rates were 96.5%, 93.7%, and 91.2% for low-, favorable intermediate-, and unfavorable intermediate-risk groups, respectively. Cumulative late toxicity (CTCAE v4.0) of G2+ was as follows: gastrointestinal (GI)-G2: 9.1%; G3: 0.5%; genitourinary (GU)-G2: 4.3%, and no G3 toxicity was observed. PSA relapse was observed in 58 (6.8%) patients: 16 local, 22 lymph node, 4 bone recurrences, and 10 combined sites of relapse were detected. Throughout the follow-up period, 40 patients (4.7%) died, though none due to prostate cancer. Ultra-hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy is an effective treatment for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with long-term bDFS rates comparable to other techniques. It is promising for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and has acceptable long-term GI and favorable GU toxicity.

LDR-Brachytherapy monotherapy appears unsuited for NCCN unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients

BackgroundTo validate the subdivision of intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) into favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) and unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) PCa in a historical patient cohort and to compare 2 different radiotherapy regimens. MethodsPatients with intermediate-risk (IR) PCa, treated either by 125J-LDR-brachytherapy monotherapy (BT) or by combined-modality radiation therapy (CRT), were retrospectively subclassified into FIR and UIR and reanalyzed with regard to biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and log-rank tests were applied to estimate survival probabilities and compare survival, respectively. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression. ResultsOf 490 IR patients, 252 had received BT (86.5% FIR, 13.5% UIR), and 238 had received CRT (30% FIR, 70% UIR). Retrospective analysis revealed that BRFS at 10 years was 81% for BT, and 94% for CRT in FIR patients. For UIR patients, BRFS at 10 years was 37% for BT, and 89% for CRT. MFS at 10 years for FIR patients was 87% for BT, and 94% for CRT. For UIR patients MFS at 10 years was 78% for BT, and 95% for CRT. In multivariable analysis treatment (BT vs. CRT) was the single associated factor for biochemical recurrence, and for metastases in the UIR group (BFRS, P < 0.001, HR 16.07 (CI 4.23–61.10); MFS, P = 0.011, HR 8.43 (CI 1.62–43.9). ConclusionsSubclassification of IR prostate cancer into FIR and UIR subcategories appears mandatory. For FIR patients, outcomes after BT monotherapy were acceptable. However, clinical failure after 125J-LDR-BT in UIR patients was notably increased, suggesting that BT monotherapy was less successful in this risk group. In contrast, the outcome in UIR patients after CRT was excellent.

PP04 Presentation Time: 9:47 AM: Outcomes of Patients with Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy with or without Androgen Deprivation Therapy

PP04 Presentation Time: 9:47 AM: Outcomes of Patients with Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy with or without Androgen Deprivation Therapy