Unexpected Safety Findings Research Articles

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Macitentan in Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Results from MERIT and its Open-Label Extension.

Evidence for use of pulmonary arterial hypertension targeted-therapies in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is limited. In MERIT-1, the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan improved hemodynamic and functional parameters versus placebo in patients with inoperable CTEPH over a 24-week double-blind (DB) period. Its open-label (OL) extension study (MERIT-2) provides long-term safety/efficacy data. MERIT-2 (NCT02060721) was a multicenter, single-arm, OL, phase 2 extension study of MERIT-1. Patients completing MERIT-1 were eligible to receive 10 mg macitentan once-daily in MERIT-2. Safety and efficacy (6-min walk distance [6MWD] and change in World Health Organization functional class [WHO FC]) were assessed in all patients in MERIT-2 regardless of treatment received in DB (All patients MERIT-2 OL macitentan 10mg group) and the subgroup of patients receiving DB macitentan in MERIT-1 (Long-term [DB/OL] macitentan 10mg subgroup). Of the 80 patients randomized in MERIT-1, 76 entered MERIT-2 (All patients MERIT-2 OL macitentan 10mg group): 40 who received DB macitentan (DB-macitentan patients) and 36 DB placebo (DB-placebo patients). Median (interquartile range) macitentan exposure in the All patients MERIT-2 OL macitentan 10mg group was 45.5 (26.0, 66.1) months. During the OL period, treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) were reported in 72 (94.7%) patients; most frequent were worsening of pulmonary hypertension (19.7%), decreased hemoglobin (18.4%) and upper respiratory tract infection (15.8%). Fourteen (18.4%) patients died; none were assessed as macitentan-related. At Month 6 post-OL baseline, mean (standard deviation) change in 6MWD was - 0.4m (43.62) for DB-macitentan patients and 10.7m (45.63) for DB-placebo patients; the majority had unchanged (83.3%) or improved (12.5%) WHO FC. Safety/efficacy analyses were consistent in the Long-term (DB/OL) macitentan 10 mg subgroup. These analyses provide long-term safety/efficacy data in patients with inoperable CTEPH treated with macitentan. No unexpected safety findings occurred; reported AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of macitentan. At 6 months post-OL baseline, DB-placebo patients modestly improved 6MWD; DB-macitentan patients maintained improvements observed in MERIT-1. WHO FC was largely unchanged. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02021292; NCT02060721.

Alternative Complement Pathway Inhibition with Iptacopan in IgA Nephropathy.

The alternative complement pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Iptacopan specifically binds to factor B and inhibits the alternative pathway. In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adults with biopsy-confirmed IgA nephropathy and proteinuria (defined as a 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of ≥1 [with protein and creatinine both measured in grams]) despite optimized supportive therapy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive oral iptacopan (200 mg) or placebo twice daily for 24 months while continuing to receive supportive therapy. The primary objective of this prespecified interim analysis was to assess the efficacy of iptacopan as compared with that of placebo in reducing proteinuria at month 9; the primary end point was the change from baseline in the 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio at month 9. The proportion of patients who had a 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of less than 1 at month 9 without receiving rescue or alternative medication or undergoing kidney-replacement therapy (dialysis or transplantation) was a secondary end point. Safety was also assessed. The effect of iptacopan on kidney function will be assessed at the end of the 2-year double-blind treatment period. The main trial population included 222 patients in the iptacopan group and 221 in the placebo group. The interim efficacy analysis included the first 250 patients who underwent randomization in the main trial population (125 patients in each group) and who remained in the trial until month 9 or discontinued the trial by month 9. Safety was assessed in all the patients in the main trial population. At month 9, the adjusted geometric mean 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was 38.3% (95% confidence interval, 26.0 to 48.6; two-sided P<0.001) lower with iptacopan than with placebo. The reduction in proteinuria was supported by consistent results in secondary end point analyses. There were no unexpected safety findings with iptacopan. The incidence of adverse events that occurred during the treatment period was similar in the two groups; most events were mild to moderate in severity and reversible. No increased risk of infection was observed. Among patients with IgA nephropathy, treatment with iptacopan resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria as compared with placebo. (Funded by Novartis; APPLAUSE-IgAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04578834.).

Long-Term Safety of Gantenerumab in Participants with Alzheimer's Disease: A Phase III, Double-Blind, and Open-Label Extension Study (Marguerite RoAD).

Gantenerumab is an anti-amyloid-β immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody for subcutaneous (SC) administration. The efficacy and safety of low-dose (105 mg or 225 mg) gantenerumab were investigated in Marguerite RoAD (MR; NCT02051608), a Phase III, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled study in participants with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. Following a preplanned futility analysis of the SCarlet RoAD study (NCT01224106), MR was converted into an open-label extension (OLE). The DB study aimed to assess the efficacy of gantenerumab compared with placebo from baseline to Week 104 in participants with mild AD dementia. Following conversion to an OLE, this objective became exploratory, as the OLE assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of SC gantenerumab at doses of up to 1,200 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in OLE participants. Eligible DB study participants were offered the opportunity to receive gantenerumab up-titrated to 1,200 mg Q4W. Safety and tolerability were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), physical and neurologic examinations, and adverse event monitoring. Overall, 225 participants were rolled over from the DB part of MR and received ≥1 gantenerumab dose in the OLE. The median treatment duration was 123 weeks. Fifty-nine (26.2%) and 41 (18.2%) participants had amyloid-related imaging abnormality (ARIA)-edema and ARIA-hemorrhage MRI findings, respectively. ARIA findings were manageable with MRI monitoring and dose intervention; most were asymptomatic. There were no unexpected safety findings. SC gantenerumab at doses of up to 1,200 mg Q4W were well tolerated in participants with mild AD dementia.

The efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs: The Soli-D randomized controlled trial.

To compare the efficacy and safety of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) with premixed insulin, insulin degludec plus insulin aspart (IDegAsp), in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drug(s) (OADs). In Soli-D, a 24-week, multicentre, open-label, study, insulin-naïve adults were randomized 1:1 to once-daily injections of iGlarLixi (n = 291) or IDegAsp (n = 291), with continued metformin ± sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints included superiority in HbA1c change and body weight (BW) change at week 24. Hypoglycaemia rates were also assessed. At week 24, iGlarLixi showed non-inferiority and superiority over IDegAsp in HbA1c reduction (least squares [LS] mean difference: -0.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.33, -0.07]; P < .001 for non-inferiority; [97.5% CI: -0.35, -0.05]; P = .003 for superiority). iGlarLixi decreased BW and IDegAsp increased BW from baseline to week 24, with a statistically significant LS mean difference of -1.49 kg in favour of iGlarLixi (97.5% CI: -2.32, -0.66; P < .001). Event rates (per person-year) for American Diabetes Association (ADA) Level 1, 2 or 3 hypoglycaemia were lower for iGlarLixi (1.90) versus IDegAsp (2.72) (relative risk: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.98). No ADA Level 3 hypoglycaemia or unexpected safety findings were reported. In Chinese people with T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs, once-daily iGlarLixi provided better glycaemic control with BW benefit and lower hypoglycaemia event rates versus IDegAsp.

Effect of Secukinumab Versus Adalimumab Biosimilar on Radiographic Progression in Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From a Head-to-Head Randomized Phase IIIb Study.

Spinal radiographic progression is an important outcome in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). The objective of the phase IIIb SURPASS study was tocompare spinal radiographic progression in patients with radiographic axial SpA treated with secukinumab (interleukin-17A inhibitor) versus adalimumab biosimilar (Sandoz adalimumab [SDZ-ADL]; tumor necrosis factor inhibitor). Biologic-naive patients with active radiographic axial SpA, at high risk of radiographic progression (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] ≥5 mg/L and/or ≥1 syndesmophyte[s] on spinal radiographs), were randomized (1:1:1) to secukinumab (150/300 mg) or SDZ-ADL (40 mg). The proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change from baseline [CFB] in modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score [mSASSS] ≤0.5) on secukinumab versus SDZ-ADL at week 104 (primary endpoint), mean CFB-mSASSS, proportion of patients with ≥1 syndesmophyte(s) at baseline with no new syndesmophyte(s), and safety were evaluated. Overall, 859 patients (78.5% male, mSASSS 16.6, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 7.1, hsCRP 20.4 mg/L, and 73.0% with ≥1 syndesmophyte[s]) received secukinumab 150 mg (n = 287), secukinumab 300 mg (n = 286), or SDZ-ADL (n = 286). At week 104, the proportion of patients with no radiographic progression was 66.1%, 66.9%, and 65.6% (P = not significant, both secukinumab doses) and mean CFB-mSASSS was 0.54, 0.55, and 0.72 in secukinumab 150 mg, secukinumab 300 mg, and SDZ-ADL arms, respectively. Overall, 56.9%, 53.8%, and 53.3% of patients on secukinumab 150 mg, secukinumab 300 mg, and SDZ-ADL, respectively, with ≥1 syndesmophyte(s) at baseline did not develop new syndesmophyte(s) by week 104. There were no unexpected safety findings. Spinal radiographic progression over two years was low with no significant difference between secukinumab and SDZ-ADL arms. The safety of both treatments was consistent with previous reports.

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the Combined OPUS/OrPHeUS Studies.

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) carries a worse prognosis than other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Data regarding use of PAH-specific therapies in patients with PoPH are sparse as they are usually excluded from clinical trials. This analysis describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety profiles in patients with PoPH newly initiating macitentan in the USA using the OPUS/OrPHeUS combined dataset. OPUS was a prospective, US, multicenter, observational drug registry (April 2014-June 2020); OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter chart review (October 2013-March 2017). Additional information regarding patients' liver disease was retrospectively collected for patients with PoPH in OPUS. The OPUS/OrPHeUS dataset included 206 patients with PoPH (median age 58years; 52.4% female), with baseline cirrhosis and liver test abnormalities reported in 72.8% and 31.6% of patients respectively. Macitentan was initiated as combination therapy in 74.8% of patients and median (Q1, Q3) exposure to macitentan was 11.9 (3.1, 26.0) months. One-year Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence limit, CL) of patients free from all-cause hospitalization and survival were 48.6% (40.7, 56.0) and 82.2% (75.1, 87.4). Of the 96 patients with PoPH in OPUS, 29.2% were classified as in need of liver transplant due to underlying liver disease during the study; transplant waitlist registration was precluded because of PAH severity for 32.1% and 17.9% were transplanted. Hepatic adverse events (HAE) were experienced by 49.0% of patients; the most common being increased bilirubin (16.0%), ascites (7.3%), and hepatic encephalopathy (5.8%); 1.5% and 21.8% of patients discontinued macitentan as a result of HAE and non-hepatic adverse events. There were no unexpected safety findings in patients with PoPH treated with macitentan. These data add to the evidence supporting the safety and tolerability of macitentan in patients with PoPH. A graphical abstract is available with this article. OPsumit® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; OPsumit® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688; www. gov .

Efficacy and Safety Is Maintained in Adult Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Receiving Pegcetacoplan for up to 3 Years

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening disease characterized by complement-mediated hemolysis and thrombosis. Pegcetacoplan, the first complement component 3 (C3) inhibitor for PNH, increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels in complement component 5 inhibitor (C5i)-experienced and -naive adult patients with PNH in 2 phase 3 clinical trials (PEGASUS [NCT03500549] and PRINCE [NCT04085601], respectively). This integrated analysis of data from the pivotal phase 3 trials and the subsequent open-label extension (study 307; NCT03531255) evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of pegcetacoplan for PNH treatment. Methods: For this integrated analysis, baseline was defined as the initiation of pegcetacoplan, regardless of when in the trials this occurred. Patients initially received pegcetacoplan 1080 mg subcutaneously twice weekly; dose escalations to once every 3 days or 3 times weekly were permitted. Efficacy was evaluated from baseline up to Weeks 132 (2.5 years, PRINCE) and 156 (3 years, PEGASUS) by Hb, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; upper limit of normal [ULN] 226 IU/L), absolute reticulocyte count (ARC), and indirect bilirubin values; Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue scores; and transfusion avoidance rates (percentages of patients who did not require a transfusion during treatment). Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) during pegcetacoplan monotherapy for up to 3 years. Results: Of the 133 patients in the phase 3 trials (PEGASUS, 80; PRINCE, 53), 114 enrolled in the extension study (PEGASUS, 64; PRINCE, 50). At least 75% had received a transfusion in the year before enrolling in PEGASUS or PRINCE. Prior to pegcetacoplan initiation, mean (SD) Hb levels were 8.95 (1.09) g/dL in PEGASUS, 9.27 (1.44) g/dL in PRINCE, and 9.08 (1.24) g/dL in the total population; median (interquartile range) LDH levels were 217.0 (184.8, 276.5) IU/L in PEGASUS, 1964.0 (1409.0, 2503.3) IU/L in PRINCE; and mean (SD) FACIT-Fatigue scores were 31.6 (11.7) in PEGASUS, 36.6 (10.0) in PRINCE, and 33.6 (11.3) in the total population. After pegcetacoplan initiation, mean Hb levels markedly improved from baseline and remained stable through Weeks 132 (2.5 years, PRINCE) and 156 (3 years, PEGASUS) ( Figure). Median LDH rapidly decreased and stabilized below the ULN ( Figure). Improvements in ARC and indirect bilirubin were similarly maintained. Average FACIT-Fatigue scores increased (indicating less fatigue) rapidly and were maintained near the general population norm of 43.6. Annual transfusion avoidance ranged from 71%-79% in PEGASUS and 80%-86% in PRINCE, with 52% of patients from PEGASUS avoiding transfusion for up to 3 years of pegcetacoplan treatment and 67% of patients from PRINCE avoiding transfusion for up to 2.5 years. Overall, &amp;gt;92% patients had compliance rates of at least 95%. Over 3 years, most patients experienced an AE; SAEs were reported in 50.0% of patients, with 4.5% experiencing a SAE deemed related to pegcetacoplan. Overall, 17 patients discontinued pegcetacoplan due to an AE; of those, 9 discontinued due to a hemolytic disorder, 7 of which discontinued within 1 year of starting pegcetacoplan. Over 3 years, 4 (3.0%) deaths occurred, none were deemed related to pegcetacoplan; 3 (2.3%) patients experienced a thrombotic event (in the context of multiple associated comorbidities or discontinuation of pegcetacoplan) and no cases of meningitis were reported. Overall, no new or unexpected safety findings were identified. Conclusions: Rapid improvements in Hb, LDH, ARC, indirect bilirubin, and FACIT-Fatigue values were observed and maintained up to 3 years in C5i-experienced patients and up to 2.5 years in C5i-naive patients. The transfusion burden was significantly reduced. No new safety findings were identified. This analysis demonstrates sustained efficacy and continued safety of long-term pegcetacoplan for patients with PNH, regardless of prior C5i treatment.

Seven-Day Vein-to-Vein Point-of-Care Manufactured CD19 CAR T Cells (GLPG5201) in Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL Including Richter's Transformation: Results from the Phase 1 Euplagia-1 Trial

Background Despite treatment advances, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) remain incurable. Patients (pts) with concurrent Richter's transformation (RT) have poor prognoses with limited treatment options. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products targeting CD19 have shown activity in pts with CLL/SLL or RT, yet data are limited and no therapies are approved. Due to limited treatment options and short survival of pts with RT, rapid treatment delivery is essential. A novel decentralized and automated point-of-care (PoC) manufacturing model was developed to administer fresh, autologous CAR-T treatments within 7 days of apheresis. An update on the Phase (Ph) 1 Euplagia-1 trial of PoC manufactured GLPG5201 is presented. Methods Euplagia-1 (CTIS: 2022-501686-47-00) is a Ph1/2 study of PoC-manufactured GLPG5201 in pts with R/R CLL or SLL, including pts with RT. Pts with CD19+ R/R CLL/SLL with ≥2 prior therapy lines are eligible. Pts with RT are eligible regardless of prior therapy. GLPG5201, an anti-CD19/41BB CAR-T therapy, is administered as a fresh product following fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Upon screening, pts receive daily ibrutinib until leukapheresis. The primary objectives are safety and determining a recommended Ph2 dose (Ph1), and objective response rate (ORR; Ph2). Secondary objectives include additional efficacy measures, pharmacokinetics and feasibility of PoC manufacturing. Results As of April 26, 2023, 12 pts were enrolled in Ph1 at dose level (DL) 1 (35×10 6 CAR+ T cells, n=6) or DL2 (100×10 6 CAR+ T cells, n=6) at a single institution. All pts were diagnosed with R/R CLL, 7/12 with concurrent RT. Median age was 66 years (range 58-71); 8/12 pts were male. Median prior lines of therapy were 4 (range 2-10); 10/12 pts received a BTK inhibitor, 9/12 pts venetoclax, and 1 pt an allogeneic stem-cell transplant. Five of 7 pts with RT relapsed after, or were refractory to, R-CHOP. Six of 12 pts had a TP53 mutation, 1 pt had a 17p deletion; 11 pts had an unmutated IGHV status and 2 had a complex karyotype reported. GLPG5201 was manufactured for all pts and administered as a fresh infusion. Median vein-to-vein time was 7 days (range 7-14). Due to lower manufactured CAR+ T cell yield, 3 pts received DL1 instead of the intended DL2. A preserved early memory phenotype for CD4+ and CD8+ CAR T cells was observed in the final product, compared with apheresis starting material ( Figure). Most treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were Grade 1-2; most Grade ≥3 events were hematological ( Table). Six (50%) pts had Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with no CRS Grade ≥3. No neurotoxicity was reported. A dose limiting toxicity occurred in 1 pt (Grade 4 neutropenia, DL2), which was manageable and within expectations in this pt population. No unexpected GLPG5201-related toxicities were observed; no deaths occurred while pts were on study. Eleven pts responded to treatment (best ORR 92%). Complete response (CR) was observed for 9 pts (CR rate [CRR] 75%). ORR and CRR were 83% and 67% at DL1, and 100% and 83% at DL2, respectively. All but 1 pt with RT responded (ORR 86%); CR was achieved by 5/7 pts with RT (CRR 71%). One pt with RT was refractory with CD19-negative disease. At the time of analysis, 9/11 (82%) pts had ongoing responses; duration was up to 9 months post-infusion (median follow-up 3.2 months; range 1-9). Two pts progressed after an initial response, 1 pt with CD19-negative disease. Robust CAR T-cell expansion was observed in all pts by qPCR, with a median maximum expansion of 4.4×10 5 copies/µg DNA (C max). Median T max was 14 days (range 9-20 days). Median AUC 0-28d was 5.3×10 6 copies/µg DNA × days. GLPG5201 could be detected in peripheral blood up to 9 months post-infusion. Conclusion Data from 12 pts enrolled in the Ph1 Euplagia-1 study demonstrate that PoC CAR-T manufacturing with a short vein-to-vein time is feasible. GLPG5201 is administered as a fresh product; median vein-to-vein time is 7 days. There are no unexpected safety findings, and no CRS Grade ≥3 or any ICANS are reported. Efficacy data are encouraging, with a 92% best ORR and 75% CRR; 6/7 pts with RT responded. With this novel PoC manufacturing model, an early phenotype of less differentiated CAR T cells is preserved in the final product. GLPG5201 demonstrates rapid in vivo expansion and durable persistence post-infusion . Euplagia-1 is ongoing, and updated data will be presented.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Pill Combination of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Chinese Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia Inadequately Controlled by Statin Treatment (ROZEL): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Many patients with primary hypercholesterolemia do not achieve their plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with statin alone under a recommended dose of statin (e.g., 10 mg rosuvastatin) in China. The objective of this phase III study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new single-pill combination (SPC) of rosuvastatin 10 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (R10/E10) in this population. This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia inadequately controlled with statin alone. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive SPC R10/E10 or R10. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of SPC R10/E10 vs. R10 in reducing the LDL-C levels after 8 weeks. This trial randomized 305 participants to SPC R10/E10 (n = 153) and R10 (n = 152). The superiority of SPC R10/E10 over R10 was demonstrated with the least square (LS) mean difference of percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 8: - 13.85% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 20.15% to - 7.56%, P < 0.0001). The proportion of participants who achieved the LDL-C target (< 2.6 mmol/l) at week 8 was larger with SPC R10/E10 (n = 80, 54.1%) than with R10 (n = 42, 29.2%) (Odds ratio = 2.80, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.61, P < 0.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported. The results suggest that SPC R10/E10 improve LDL-C reduction and goal achievement in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled on statin therapy, without new safety findings. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04669041).

Off-target pharmacological activity at various kinases: Potential functional and pathological side effects

In drug discovery, during the lead optimization and candidate characterization stages, novel small molecules are frequently evaluated in a battery of in vitro pharmacology assays to identify potential unintended, off-target interactions with various receptors, transporters, ion channels, and enzymes, including kinases. Furthermore, these screening panels may also provide utility at later stages of development to provide a mechanistic understanding of unexpected safety findings. Here, we present a compendium of the most likely functional and pathological outcomes associated with interaction(s) to a panel of 95 kinases based on an extensive curation of the scientific literature. This panel of kinases was designed by AbbVie based on safety-related data extracted from the literature, as well as from over 20 years of institutional knowledge generated from discovery efforts. For each kinase, the scientific literature was reviewed using online databases and the most often reported functional and pathological effects were summarized. This work should serve as a practical guide for small molecule drug discovery scientists and clinical investigators to predict and/or interpret adverse effects related to pharmacological interactions with these kinases.

A phase 2 trial of defibrotide for the prevention of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome

AbstractChimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy represents a major advance in cancer immunotherapy; however, it can be associated with life-threatening neurotoxicity linked to blood-brain barrier disruption and endothelial activation. Defibrotide was shown to reduce endothelial cell activation in vitro and is approved in the United States for treatment of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) in patients with renal or pulmonary dysfunction after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and in the European Union for severe VOD/SOS after HCT in patients aged >1 month. Defibrotide may stabilize the endothelium during CAR-T therapy and reduce the rate of CAR-T–associated neurotoxicity. This phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of defibrotide for prevention of CAR-T–associated neurotoxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel. Part 1 established the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 6.25 mg/kg); 20 patients (from parts 1 and 2) receiving the RP2D were evaluable for efficacy. Rate of CAR-T–associated neurotoxicity by day 30 (primary end point) was ∼50%, lower than reported in the ZUMA-1 trial (64%). Median event duration of grade ≥3 neurotoxicity was 7 days. No unexpected defibrotide-related safety findings and defibrotide-related treatment-emergent adverse events or deaths were reported. Results showed modest reduction in rate of CAR-T–associated neurotoxicity and high-grade neurotoxicity event duration relative to historical data; however, reduction was unlikely to meet the primary end point, so the study was terminated early. Nevertheless, results contribute valuable data for potential therapeutic insight on the management of CAR-T–associated neurotoxicity. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03954106.

A pooled subgroup analysis of glucarpidase treatment in 86 pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients receiving high-dose methotrexate therapy in open-label trials.

Delayed methotrexate elimination can occur in patients undergoing high-dose methotrexate cancer treatment. Effectiveness of glucarpidase for rapidly reducing methotrexate concentrations was shown in compassionate-use trials in patients aged 0-84years. We performed post hoc analyses of infants (≥28days to <2years), children (≥2 to <12years), adolescents (≥12 to <15years), and young adults (≥15 to <25years) from four multicenter, open-label, single-arm, glucarpidase compassionate-use trials. Patients had toxic methotrexate levels due to delayed methotrexate elimination and/or renal dysfunction, and received glucarpidase (50U/kg). The primary endpoint was clinically important reduction (CIR) in plasma methotrexate (methotrexate ≤1μmol/L at all post-glucarpidase measurements) based on high-performance liquid chromatography. Among 86 patients included in efficacy analyses, CIR was achieved by zero of one infant (0.0%), five of 16 children (31.3%), seven of 24 adolescents (29.2%), and 26/45 young adults (57.8%). Median methotrexate reduction was 98.7% or higher in each group 15minutes post-glucarpidase. Patients with pre-glucarpidase methotrexate less than 50μmol/L (35/42, 83.3%) were more likely to achieve CIR than those with methotrexate 50μmol/L or higher (1/37, 2.7%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was paresthesia, occurring in three adolescents (4.5%) and six young adults (5.2%). No other treatment-related adverse event occurred in 5% or higher of any age group. After accounting for pre-glucarpidase methotrexate levels, glucarpidase efficacy at inducing CIR in pediatric/young adult patients was consistent, with efficacy observed in the overall study population (i.e., patients aged 0-84), and no unexpected safety findings were observed. These findings demonstrate glucarpidase (50U/kg) is an effective and well-tolerated dose for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients.

178-OR: Better Glycemic Control with Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec vs. Once-Daily Insulin Degludec in Insulin-Naïve Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 3)

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) vs once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in insulin-naïve adults with T2D were examined in ONWARDS 3 (NCT04795531), a 26-week, randomized, double blind, double dummy, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial. Participants (n=588) were randomized 1:1 to icodec or degludec. Key outcomes are shown in the table. The primary endpoint was A1C change from baseline (BL) to week 26. Estimated mean A1C change was greater with icodec (−1.57%; BL: 8.55%) vs degludec (−1.36%; BL: 8.48%); estimated treatment difference −0.21%-points (95% CI −0.34, −0.08), confirming non-inferiority (p&amp;lt;0.0001) and superiority (p=0.0016). Level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia rates were numerically but not statistically significantly higher with icodec vs degludec in the on-treatment period. Odds of achieving A1C &amp;lt;7% without level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia were statistically significantly higher with icodec vs degludec. There were no significant differences in weekly insulin dose from week 24 to 26 or body weight change from BL to week 26 between arms. No unexpected safety findings were observed. Overall, once-weekly icodec demonstrated superior A1C reduction vs once-daily degludec with low level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia rates in both arms. Icodec may facilitate insulin treatment acceptance and adherence by reducing basal insulin injections from ≥365 to 52 per year. Disclosure I.Lingvay: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk A/S, Lilly Diabetes, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi, Consultant; Carmot Therapeutics, Inc., Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp., Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Pfizer Inc., Intercept, Intarcia, Valeritas, TargetRWE, Shionogi, Zealand Pharma, Structure, Bayer, Research Support; Novo Nordisk A/S, Boehringer-Ingelheim. M.Asong: Employee; Novo Nordisk. C.Desouza: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk A/S, Bayer Inc., Consultant; Asahi Kasei Corporation, Research Support; Eli Lilly and Company. P.Gourdy: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Bayer Inc., Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp., Novartis, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Research Support; Novo Nordisk, Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim. S.Kar: None. A.G.Vianna: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Board Member; Abbott Diabetes, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Research Support; Novo Nordisk, Anji Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic. T.Vilsbøll: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Mundipharma, Merck &amp; Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. S.M.Vinther: Employee; Novo Nordisk. Y.Mu: Speaker's Bureau; Abbott Diabetes, Boehringer Ingelheim Inc., Novo Nordisk (China), Sanifit. Funding Novo Nordisk A/S

Updated Findings of the Phase II LCMC3 Trial of Lung Cancer Patients

Lung Cancer: Lung CancerResults from an exploratory analysis of the Phase II LCMC3 trial showed that patients with resectable Stage IB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received adjuvant atezolizumab following neoadjuvant atezolizumab and resection had improved disease-free survival compared with those who were not administered adjuvant atezolizumab. These findings, presented during the 2023 European Lung Cancer Congress, also demonstrated a trend toward improved overall survival among patients who underwent adjuvant atezolizumab (Abstract 145MO). “Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (IO) treatment without adjuvant treatment in CheckMate 816 has shown to improve pathologic responses and event-free survival outcomes,” noted study author David P. Carbone, MD, PhD, the Barbara J. Bonner Chair in Lung Cancer Research and Director of the James Thoracic Center at The James Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. “However, it is completely unclear what the role of adjuvant immunotherapy is after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and there is no current study testing the role of adjuvant IO.” LCMC3 (NCT02927301) is an open-label, single-arm, Phase II study of neoadjuvant followed by optional adjuvant atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) in resectable NSCLC. The primary endpoint—major pathological response (MPR)—was met with an observed MPR rate of 20 percent after neoadjuvant atezolizumab in patients without EGFR or ALK alterations who underwent surgery (Nature Med 2022; doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01962-5). Carbone and colleagues report updated disease-free survival, overall survival, and safety data from patients who received adjuvant atezolizumab versus those who did not. Methods & Findings Patients eligible for this study included those 18 years or older who had Stage IB-IIIA or select IIIB NSCLC, as well as an ECOG performance status of 0-1. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (≤10% viable tumor cells). Secondary endpoints included pathologic response by PD-L1 and radiographic response by PD-L1, TMB, neoantigen, and GEP. Disease-free survival, overall survival, and biomarkers were exploratory endpoints. Safety was also examined during the adjuvant phase. Study participants received neoadjuvant atezolizumab (1,200 mg IV for ≤2 cycles) followed by surgery. Individuals without disease progression had the option to undergo adjuvant atezolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤12 months. With a data cutoff of October 21, 2022, the primary efficacy population included 137 patients without EGFR/ALK alterations who had surgery and MPR assessment. Of those, 53 (39%) received adjuvant atezolizumab and 84 (61%) did not. The baseline characteristics between these two groups were generally well-balanced, according to Carbone. However, he did note that patients who received adjuvant atezolizumab had a higher rate of squamous NSCLC (47% vs. 31%). They were also more likely to have a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of 50 percent or higher (40% vs. 27%) and MPR status (42% vs. 8%) when compared to their counterparts who did not receive adjuvant atezolizumab. Study authors reported an updated 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rate for the entire cohort of 72 percent and 82 percent, respectively. Disease-free and overall survival rates for Stage I/II were 75 percent and 82 percent, and 68 percent and 81 percent for Stage III. In the MPR-evaluable population, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 83 percent for those who were given adjuvant atezolizumab versus 64 percent for those who did not receive this treatment. Among patients without MPR (n=108), Carbone reported a 3-year disease-free survival of 80 percent for individuals who underwent adjuvant atezolizumab compared with 62 percent for those who did not. Three-year overall survival was 87 percent and 75 percent, respectively. Carbone reported no unexpected safety findings. Among patients in the adjuvant atezolizumab safety population (n=57), any-grade adverse events (AEs) were observed in 96 percent of patients, including Grade 3/4 (40%) and Grade 5 (5%) adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade were reported in 63 percent of patients. Twenty-one percent had a Grade 3 treatment-related adverse event. Study authors reported that 23 percent of patients experienced any-grade AEs that led to treatment discontinuation, including 19 percent with Grade 3/4 (19%) and Grade 5 (2%) adverse events. Immune-mediated adverse events were seen in 46 percent of patients treated with adjuvant atezolizumab. This included 16 percent with a Grade 3/4 event. Study authors reported that 33 percent of patients experienced any-grade immune-mediated treatment-related adverse events with 16 percent being Grade 3/4. Significance & Implications This exploratory analysis suggests that LCMC3 patients with resectable NSCLC who received adjuvant atezolizumab may have improved disease-free survival and showed a trend toward improved overall survival when compared with those who did not receive adjuvant atezolizumab, according to Carbone. “The non-MPR subgroup also showed a trend toward improved disease-free survival and overall survival in patients who received adjuvant atezolizumab,” he said, while also emphasizing that adjuvant atezolizumab was well-tolerated with no new safety concerns. “This single-arm study showed that outcomes were better than anticipated in patients who received adjuvant atezolizumab, which may prompt further studies of IO monotherapy,” Carbone concluded. Catlin Nalley is a contributing writer.

Open RoAD: Design and baseline characteristics of an open‐label rollover study evaluating long‐term safety and tolerability of subcutaneous gantenerumab in participants with early Alzheimer’s disease

AbstractBackgroundGantenerumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting aggregated beta‐amyloid (Abeta), is a potential disease‐modifying treatment for early (prodromal‐to‐mild) Alzheimer’s disease (AD). SCarlet RoAD (SR) (NCT01224106) and Marguerite RoAD (MR) (NCT02051608) were two Phase III trials which assessed the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC), low‐dose gantenerumab in participants with prodromal and mild AD, respectively, for up to 2 years. Following a gap period gantenerumab treatment was continued with uptitration to a dose of 1,200 mg monthly in open‐label extensions (OLE), which demonstrated substantial Abeta removal by positron emission tomography without new or unexpected safety findings. Here, we describe the study design, present baseline characteristics, and safety data from an additional open‐label, multicenter, rollover study, Open RoAD (OR) (NCT04339413), collecting long‐term safety and tolerability data for gantenerumab in participants who completed the SR OLE or MR OLE.MethodParticipants who completed either OLE study and were treated with doses up to 1,200 mg of gantenerumab for up to 5 years continue to receive the same dose of SC gantenerumab (every 4 weeks [q4w]) for 2 additional years in OR. The primary objective is to evaluate long‐term safety and tolerability by assessing adverse events, including amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities, and injection‐site reactions. Exploratory efficacy objectives include Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score. The long‐term effect of gantenerumab on pharmacodynamic measures and biomarkers will also be explored.Result Baseline characteristics Fifty‐nine participants from SR OLE and 56 participants from MR OLE received at least one dose of gantenerumab in OR. The median participant age at baseline was 78 years, and the majority of the participants were female (61%). Sixty‐seven percent of participants were apolipoprotein‐E‐e4 (APOE e4) carriers. The median total MMSE score at baseline was 16. Safety data will be presented. ConclusionThe RoAD studies are among the longest‐duration OLEs of an anti‐amyloid monoclonal antibody. Data from the OR study demonstrate that gantenerumab at doses of 1,200 mg administered SC q4w is well tolerated, with no new or unexpected safety findings in patients with early AD.

Updated phase I study results of PHE885, a T-Charge manufactured BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, for patients (pts) with r/r multiple myeloma (RRMM).

8004 Background: B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) targeted CAR-T cells are approved for RRMM. Long manufacturing time and high clinical demand limit access. T-Charge, an innovative platform that reduces manufacturing time to &lt;2 days and preserves T cell stemness, results in robust expansion and prolonged CAR T cell persistence. Here we report updated results from the Phase I trial of T-Charge manufactured, fully human, BCMA CAR-T PHE885 (NCT04318327). Methods: Eligible pts had RRMM after ≥2 prior lines of therapy (tx). Pts received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (or bendamustine) for lymphodepletion (LD) prior to PHE885 infusion. Primary objective was safety. Secondary objectives were clinical response and cellular kinetics. Results: As of December 22, 2022, 46 pts received PHE885 at the following doses: 2.5e6 (n=4), 5e6 (n=13), 10e6 (n=20), 14.3e6 (n=1), and 20e6 (n=8) CAR T cells. PHE885 was manufactured for 61% of pts at a single academic institution; these pts proceeded from apheresis to LD in a median of 16 days. Median age at enrollment was 65 y (range [R] 45-81), median prior lines of tx was 4 (R 2-10). 37% of pts had extramedullary disease; 96% were triple refractory. Despite aggressive disease, only 28% of pts required bridging chemotherapy, predominantly influenced by quick production time. 96% of pts experienced any gr cytokine release syndrome (CRS); 11% had gr 3 CRS. Median time to CRS onset was 8 (R 2-16) days and median duration was 4 (R 1-19) days. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 22% of pts; 7% had gr 3 ICANS. Dose limiting toxicities were experienced by 13% of pts and included gr 4 neutropenia, gr 4 lipase increase, gr 3 serum amylase increase, gr 3 neurotoxicity, gr 3 transaminitis, and gr 3 ejection fraction reduction. The most common tx-related gr ≥3 AEs included anemia (54%), neutropenia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (37%). Geo-mean peak PHE885 expansion (Cmax) was 276,000 copies/µg by qPCR and 70.6% of CD3+ T cells by flow cytometry (n=41). The PHE885 transgene was detected in 13/14 (93%) pts at 6 mo and 5/7 (71%) at 12 mo post infusion. T cells with early memory phenotype were preserved in the final product and persisted in pts post infusion. In 43 efficacy-evaluable pts, the ORR was 98%. At 10e6 dose (n=19), ORR was 100% and CRR was 42% (median follow-up of 4.9 mo [R 1.4-11.8]); 60% of 10 evaluable pts were MRD negative at 10-5 by NGS. Initial efficacy data at 20e6 and longer follow-up at active doses will also be presented. Conclusions: T-Charge manufactured PHE885 produced high response rates with no unexpected safety findings in heavily pretreated RRMM pts with aggressive disease. PHE885 expanded rapidly and showed durable persistence in vivo. Since conversion to CR/sCR has occurred as late as 18 months after infusion in this study, longer follow-up is ongoing to identify a recommended dose for future development. Clinical trial information: NCT04318327 .

Once-Daily Crisaborole Ointment, 2%, as a Long-Term Maintenance Treatment in Patients Aged ≥ 3 Months with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A 52-Week Clinical Study.

Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) used reactively often fail to achieve lasting disease control; many of these therapies are associated with safety concerns that limit long-term use. Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD that has potential as a long-term maintenance therapy. The aim was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of crisaborole once daily (QD) compared to vehicle QD as a maintenance therapy to reduce the incidence of flares in patients with AD who previously responded to crisaborole twice daily (BID). CrisADe CONTROL was a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 52-week, phase III study of patients aged ≥3 months with mild-to-moderate AD involving ≥5% treatable body surface area. Eligible patients received crisaborole BID during an open-label run-in period of up to 8 weeks. Responders were randomly assigned in the double-blind maintenance period to receive either crisaborole QD or vehicle QD. Responders were defined as patients who achieved Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) success (ISGA score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with a ≥ 2-grade improvement) and ≥ 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index total score (EASI-50) from baseline. Patients who experienced a flare (ISGA score ≥2) during the double-blind maintenance period switched to crisaborole BID for up to 12 weeks. During this period, patients were assessed every 4 weeks; if the flare resolved (ISGA score ≤ 1), patients resumed their assigned treatment. The primary endpoint was flare-free maintenance until onset of the first flare. Key secondary endpoints were number of flare-free days, number of flares, and maintenance of pruritus response until onset of the first flare. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was also analyzed. Overall, 497 patients entered the open-label run-in period with crisaborole BID, of which 270 patients were randomized into the 52-week double-blind maintenance period of the study. Of the 270 patients, 135 were randomly assigned to the crisaborole QD group and 135 were randomly assigned to the vehicle QD group. Median time of flare-free maintenance was longer for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (111 vs 30 days, respectively; p = 0.0034). The mean number of flare-free days was higher for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (234.0 vs 199.4 days, respectively; p = 0.0346). The mean number of flares was lower for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (0.95 vs 1.36, respectively; p = 0.0042). No clear trend was observed in maintenance of pruritus response between crisaborole- and vehicle-treated patients. Crisaborole was well tolerated, with no new or unexpected safety findings when used as maintenance treatment. Crisaborole QD was effective and well tolerated for long-term maintenance treatment and flare reduction in adult and pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate AD. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04040192, 31 July 2019.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of talazoparib monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors

Talazoparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of advanced breast and prostate cancers in Western populations. This open-label, phase 1 study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of talazoparib monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Molecularly unselected patients (≥18 years) with advanced solid tumors resistant to standard therapy received talazoparib (oral, 1 mg once daily). Primary endpoint was characterization of single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints evaluated safety, unconfirmed objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response. The safety population comprised 15 Chinese patients (median [range] age 53.0 [31.0–72.0] years). Single-dose median time to first occurrence of maximum observed concentration was 1.9 h; concentrations then declined with a mean terminal half-life (t1/2) of 67 h. Following multiple dosing, median Tmax was approximately 1.85 h with steady state generally achieved by Day 21. Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 86.7% (13/15) of patients (grade 3, 20.0%; grade 4, 13.3%). Two patients (13.3%) experienced serious treatment-related TEAEs. ORR (investigator-assessed) was 6.7% (95% CI: 0.2–31.9); one patient (6.7%) had a partial response. In patients with measurable disease at baseline, the ORR was 9.1% (1/11; 95% CI: 0.2–41.3; duration of response: 114 days); stable disease was achieved by 36.4% (4/11) of patients, and 54.5% (6/11) progressed by data cut-off. In Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors, the pharmacokinetic profile of talazoparib monotherapy (1 mg/day) was consistent with other patient populations. TEAEs were generally manageable with no unexpected safety findings. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04635631 [prospectively registered November 19, 2020])

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2a Study of Tildrakizumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Tildrakizumab is an anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody approved to treat moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02980705), patients with active AS, according to modified New York criteria and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Score ≥4, were randomized 1:1 to tildrakizumab 200 mg or placebo every 4 weeks until week 24. Thereafter, all patients received tildrakizumab 200 mg every 4 weeks until week 48. The primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving 20% improvement from baseline by Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS20) at week 24. This outcome was analyzed in subgroups defined by prior treatment experience, weight, age, and sex using the full analysis set. Safety was assessed through treatment-emergent adverse events. From December 5, 2017-September 3, 2019, 101 patients (76.2% male, 97% White) enrolled and were randomized to treatment. At week 24, the ASAS20 response rate was 74.0% in patients receiving tildrakizumab 200 mg (n = 50) versus 80.4% in placebo-treated patients (n = 51; treatment difference, -6.31%; 95% confidence interval, -22.34 to 9.71; p = 0.44). No difference in treatment effect by subgroups was observed. Tildrakizumab treatment was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. The study was terminated after the week 24 interim analysis due to lack of efficacy. Tildrakizumab treatment was generally well tolerated but did not improve ASAS20 response rate versus placebo in patients with AS.

Bronchodilator responsiveness testing with inhaled budesonide/formoterol in asthma

Background The choice of bronchodilators for responsiveness testing (BRT) is a clinical decision according to ATS/ERS. Since January 2019 we use budesonide/formoterol for BRT in asthma at our center in Argentina. The aim was to compare budesonide/formoterol with salbutamol for BRT in stable asthmatic patients that were followed up in a short-acting beta2 agonist (SABA)-free asthma center. Methods From the Hospital database, we found for the same patient at least one BRT using salbutamol 200 µg and another with budesonide/formoterol 320/9 µg. Results We found similar BRT between salbutamol and budesonide/formoterol in 101 asthmatic individuals (26 males) aged 38.14 ± 16.1 yrs (mean ± Standard deviation). The absolute response was 0.18 ± 0.21 L in FEV1 after salbutamol and 0.20 ± 0.22 L in FEV1 after budesonide/formoterol. Afterwards, we showed 202 patients tested with budesonide/formoterol; the mean absolute response was 0.21 ± 0.22 L in FEV1. There were no unexpected safety findings. Conclusions In asthmatic patients, we demonstrated similar efficacy between Budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol for BRT.