Underwent Revision Hip Arthroplasty Research Articles

One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Introduction: The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes, postoperative reinfection rates, and complication rates in patients undergoing one-stage versus two-stage surgical revision for periprosthetic hip infection. Methods: The study population included adult patients who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty. Comparative studies have compared two-stage and one-stage revision strategies. Searches were conducted using the major databases. Review Manager software was used to estimate the effects. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted. Results: Nine cohort studies including 2,502 hips were included. The success rate did not show significant differences between the groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 3.37). No difference was noted in reinfection (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.56-1.19). Life quality per Harris Hip Score was higher for one-stage revision strategies (mean difference [MD] 9.00, 95% CI 2.23-15.78). No differences were noted in mortality, aseptic loosening, or revision rates. Age (MD 2.32, 95% CI 1.34-3.29) and body mass index (BMI) (MD 1.88, 95% CI 0.38-3.38) were lower in the two-stage group. Sinus tract presence was higher in the one-stage group (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.95). Paprosky I acetabulum was higher in the one-stage group, and Paprosky III was higher in the two-stage group. Conclusions: The results did not demonstrate notable clinical differences between one-stage and two-stage hip arthroplasties, regardless of the treated microorganism. However, the quality of life may be somewhat better in the one-stage group. Age, body mass index, and Paprosky classification are factors that influence procedure selection.

Long-term outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting with cemented cups and trabecular metal for revision hip arthroplasty: a follow-up study.

Revision hip arthroplasty in the presence of complex acetabular deficiencies is challenging. Cement, allograft, reconstruction rings and porous trabecular metal now provide versatile options for acetabular fixation and restoration of acetabular offset. We compare acetabular impaction bone grafting (AIBG) and trabecular metal (TM) cups at long-term follow-up. 53 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed from local joint registry data. 36 patients were revised using AIBG and 17 with TM. Median clinical follow-up was 9.57 (2.46-18.72) years and 9.65 (7.22-12.46) years, respectively. 82% of the TM group and 63% of the AIBG group were ⩾ Paprosky 2C. Re-revision was considered failure. Radiographs demonstrating 5 mm of femoral head migration and 5° of acetabular component inclination change were considered loose. Patients receiving AIBG were younger (68 vs. 74 years) with a longer interval from initial arthroplasty to revision (17 vs. 13 years). Revisions in both groups were indicated most commonly for failed cementing (AIBG 88.9% vs. TM 70.5%). No TM reconstructions underwent re-revision, with only 1 failing at 6.3 years, compared with 9 AIBG re-revisions. When revising for sepsis, 33% of AIBG revisions failed. AIBG demonstrated high failure rates at long-term follow-up when compared to TM constructs. We recommend the use of AIBG in small cavitary defects only. We strongly advise against its use in the setting of significant bony defects and for prosthetic joint infection.

RECONSTRUCTION OF PAPROSKY TYPE III ACETABULAR BONE DEFECTS IN REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING A COMBINATION OF CAGE AND MORSELIZED ALLOGRAFTS

The management of severe acetabular bone defects poses a complex challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. Although biological fixation materials are currently dominant, cage has played an important role in complex acetabular revision in the past decades, especially when a biological prosthesis is not available. The purpose of this study is to report the long-term clinical and radiographic results of Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular bone defects revised with cage and morselized allografts.We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with cage and morselized allografts between January 2007 and January 2019. Forty-three patients were followed up. There were 19 Paprosky type IIIA bone defect patients and 24 Paprosky type IIIB bone defect patients and 7 patients of the 24 were also with pelvic discontinuity. Clinical assessment included Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12). Radiographic assessment included cage stability, allografts incorporation, and center of rotation.All patients were followed up with a mean follow-up of 10.6 years, HHS and SF-12 improved significantly at last follow-up in comparison to the preoperative. There were 2 re-revisions, one at 5 years after surgery, another at 13.6 years after surgery. Two patients had nonprogressive radiolucency in zone III and the junction of zone II and zone III at the bone implant interface. Allografts of 40 (93%) cases incorporated fully.The combination of cage and morselized allograft is an alternative option for acetabular revision with Paprosky type III bone defects with satisfactory long-term follow-up results.

REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE SICKLE-CELL DISEASE: CHALLENGES AND EARLY OUTCOMES

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has proved to be an effective treatment modality for sickle-cell hip arthropathy (mosaic-like dense bone due to infarcts). However, mode of failure, survival rates and challenges associated with revision hip arthroplasty in sickle-cell disease patients are mostly unknown.We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from all patients with sickle-cell disease who underwent revision hip arthroplasty from 2016. Patient, surgery, medical and surgical complications related data were collected. The pinnacle and reclaim revision system with gription augments (JJ) was used in all patients. Pre-op and post-op clinical outcome data (both objective and subjective, HOOS Jr and OHS) were recorded. Cumulative success rates were recorded with re-revision surgery as an end point.We performed fifteen revision THAs on 13 patients (mean follow up of 6.6 years). The mean age of the patients was 48 years (range, 30–59). At final follow-up, a statistically significant improvement of mean OHS and HOOS JR scores eas found in all patients. reported (OHS: 34.0 and HOOS JR: 77.7). Cumulative success rate was 100% for re-revision for all reasons at 6 years. Five intensive care unit (ITU) admissions, two vaso-occlusive sickle cell crises, one transfusion-related complication and one acute chest syndrome (ACS) were recorded. On admission, the mean percentage of HbS was 75.25% (64.6–86.4%).Revision arthroplasty in sickle-cell disease patients poses increased risks, with medical and surgical challenges. However, with careful preparation, planning and a multi-disciplinary team approach, revision arthroplasty can result in excellent clinical outcomes and excellent functional scores in the majority of patients in the short and mid-term.

Intraoperative cell salvage in revision hip arthroplasty.

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the evidence for the use of intraoperative cell salvage in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, and specifically to analyze the available data in order to quantify any associated reduction in the use of allogenic blood transfusion, and the volume which is used. An electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was completed from the date of their inception to 24 February 2022, using a search strategy and protocol created in conjunction with the PRISMA statement. Inclusion criteria were patients aged > 18 years who underwent revision hip arthroplasty when cell salvage was used. Studies in which pre-donated red blood cells were used were excluded. A meta-analysis was also performed using a random effects model with significance set at p = 0.05. Of the 283 studies which were identified, 11 were included in the systematic review, and nine in the meta-analysis. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the proportion of patients requiring allogenic transfusion between groups, with an odds ratio of 0.331 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.165 to 0.663) associated with the use of cell salvage. For a total of 561 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty who were treated with cell salvage, 247 (44.0%) required allogenic transfusion compared with 418 of 643 patients (65.0%) who were treated without cell salvage. For those treated with cell salvage, the mean volume of allogenic blood which was required was 1.95 units (390 ml) per patient (0.7 to 4.5 units), compared with 3.25 units (650 ml) per patient (1.2 to 7.0 units) in those treated without cell salvage. The mean difference of -1.91 units (95% CI -4.0 to 0.2) in the meta-analysis was also significant (p = 0.003). We found a a significant reduction in the need for allogenic blood transfusion when cell salvage was used in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, supporting its routine use in these patients. Further research is required to determine whether this effect is associated with types of revision arthroplasty of differing complexity.

Accuracy of Personalized Computed Tomographic 3D Templating for Acetabular Cup Placement in Revision Arthroplasty.

Background: Revision hip arthroplasty presents a surgical challenge, necessitating meticulous preoperative planning to avert complications like periprosthetic fractures and aseptic loosening. Historically, assessment of the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) templating has focused exclusively on primary hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined the accuracy of 3D templating for acetabular revision cups in 30 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Utilizing computed tomography scans of the patients' pelvis and 3D templates of the implants (Aesculap Plasmafit, B. Braun; Aesculap Plasmafit Revision, B. Braun; Avantage Acetabular System, Zimmerbiomet, EcoFit 2M, Implantcast; Tritanium Revision, Stryker), we performed 3D templating and positioned the acetabular cup implants accordingly. To evaluate accuracy, we compared the planned sizes of the acetabular cups in 2D and 3D with the sizes implanted during surgery. Results: An analysis was performed to examine potential influences on templating accuracy, specifically considering factors such as gender and body mass index (BMI). Significant statistical differences (p < 0.001) in the accuracy of size prediction were observed between 3D and 2D templating. Personalized 3D templating exhibited an accuracy rate of 66.7% for the correct prediction of the size of the acetabular cup, while 2D templating achieved an exact size prediction in only 26.7% of cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2D and 3D templating methods regarding gender or BMI. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 3D templating improves the accuracy of predicting acetabular cup sizes in revision arthroplasty when compared to 2D templating. However, it should be noted that the predicted implant size generated through 3D templating tended to overestimate the implanted implant size by an average of 1.3 sizes.

Kaempferol attenuates wear particle-induced inflammatory osteolysis via JNK and p38-MAPK signaling pathways

Ethnopharmacological relevanceWear particle-induced inflammatory osteoclast activation is a master contributor to periprosthetic osteolysis, which can cause pathological bone loss and destruction. Hence, inhibiting inflammation and osteoclastogenesis is an important strategy for preventing wear particle-induced osteolysis. To date, there are no FDA-approved non-surgical pharmacotherapies for arresting periprosthetic osteolysis. Kaempferol (KAE), a natural flavonol abundant in many traditional Chinese herbal medicines, has been shown to have protective effects against inflammatory bone diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, but no previous study has evaluated the effects of KAE on wear particle-induced osteolysis. Aim of the studyThe study aimed to investigate the effects of KAE on wear particle-induced inflammatory osteolysis and osteoclast activation, and further explore the underlying mechanisms. Materials and methodsTiAl6V4 metal particles (TiPs) were retrieved from the prosthesis of patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening. A mouse calvarial osteolysis model was used to investigate the effects of KAE on wear particle-induced inflammatory osteolysis in vivo. Primary bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) were used to explore the effects of KAE on osteoclast differentiation and bone-resorbing activity as well as the underlying mechanisms in vitro. ResultsIn the present study, we found that KAE alleviated wear particle-induced inflammatory bone loss in vivo and inhibited osteoclast differentiation and function in vitro. Furthermore, we revealed that KAE exerted anti-osteoclastogenic effects by downregulating JNK and p38-MAPK signaling as well as the downstream NFATc1 expression. ConclusionsKAE is an alternative therapeutic agent for preventing and treating periprosthetic osteolysis and aseptic loosening.

Standardized 3D-printed trabecular titanium augment and cup for acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of standardized three-dimensional (3D)-printed trabecular titanium (TT) cups and augments to reconstruct most acetabular defects.MethodsWe included 58 patients with Paprosky type II and III acetabular bone defects who underwent revision hip arthroplasty between 2015 and 2018. Patients who were revised without 3D-printed augments, and cases who were lost to follow-up and died during follow-up were excluded. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. A Kaplan–Meier survivorship curve was generated. The mean follow-up was 64.5 (range 49–84) months.ResultsIn total, 48 (82.8%) acetabular revisions were performed using standardized 3D-printed TT cups and augments, and a retrospective review was conducted on 43 revisions. The average position of the vertical center of rotation and leg length discrepancy were significantly decreased from 42.4 ± 9.1 mm and 38.4 ± 10.7 mm to 22.8 ± 3.4 mm and 4.1 ± 3.0 mm, respectively. Non-progressive radiolucent lines were observed in 3 (7.5%) acetabular components with no indications for revision. The mean Harris hip score, Oxford hip score and EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire score increased from 33.0 ± 10.7, 11.4 ± 3.4 and 0.29 ± 0.09 to 80.3 ± 8.8, 35.8 ± 2.4 and 0.71 ± 0.10, respectively. The revision-free survival rate of the acetabular component was 93.0% (40/43), with a rate of revision for aseptic loosening of 2.3% (1/43).ConclusionStandardized 3D‑printed TT augments and cups could be used to reconstruct the majority of Paprosky type II and III acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty and demonstrated encouraging results at mid-term follow-up.

Comparison of patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty and patients undergoing re-revision.

The aim of this study is to compare the demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics of patients who underwent revision hip replacement surgery and those who underwent re-revision surgery. The secondary outcome is the investigation of the factors that play a role in estimating the time between primary arthroplasty surgery and revision surgery.The patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty in our clinic between 2010- 2020, patients with at least 2 years of follow-up, and who underwent re-revision surgery if needed were included. Demographic and clinical data were investigated.Of the 153 patients who met the study criteria, 120 (78.5%) underwent revision (Group 1) and 33 (21.5%) underwent re-revision (Group 2). The mean age of Group 1 was 53.5 (32-85), and of Group 2 was 67 (38-81) (p=0.003). In both groups, patients who underwent hip replacement due to fracture had more revisions and re-revisions (p=0.794). While 53.3 of the patients in Group 1 did not need additional implants, 72.7% of the patients in Group 2 needed additional implants (p=0.010). Fracture-dislocation, fistula, and the need for debridement after the revision were statistically significantly higher in patients who underwent re-revision. Harris hip scores (HHS) were statistically lower in patients who went for re-revision.The need for reoperation in patients who have undergone revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery is due to the fact that the patient's age is advanced and the indication for surgery is a fracture. While the rate of fistula, fracture, dislocation, and debridement increases after re-revision surgeries, the HHS values that indicate clinical success also decrease. We believe that studies with larger participation and longer follow-up periods are needed to explain this issue better.

Анализ биохимических показателей сыворотки крови у больных с ревизионным эндопротезированием тазобедренного сустава и нарушением углеводного обмена

INTRODUCTION: Along with increase in the number of hip arthroplasty surgeries, the number of complications after them also increases. Laboratory diagnostics, being a unified method for determining the risks of complications and relapses, indicates the need for a comparative analysis of standard laboratory parameters in patients with carbohydrate metabolism disorders (CMD) before revision arthroplasty. AIM: To evaluate changes in the biochemical parameters of blood serum of patients with impaired carbohydrate metabolism before revision arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of anamnesis, morphometry and main blood parameters of patients who underwent treatment for osteoarticular pathology and purulent osteology in inpatient facility from 2011 to 2019 were processed and analyzed. The first group included 115 patients (33% of the total amount of examined patients) with revision hip arthroplasty having no disorders in carbohydrate metabolism in history. The second group included 103 patients (30%) who underwent revision hip arthroplasty and had diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, and early forms of carbohydrate metabolism disorders as comorbidities. The third group included 73 patients (21%) with periprosthetic infection of the hip joint without history of carbohydrate metabolism disorders. The fourth group included 56 patients (16%) with periprosthetic infection, with disorders of carbohydrate metabolism. RESULTS: The results obtained in the study groups were intercompared and compared with the reference intervals established by the reagent manufacturers for each study method. In the studies, no statistically significant differences were found in the biochemical parameters of blood of patients with aseptic revision arthroplasty, depending on the existing disorders of carbohydrate metabolism. When comparing biochemical parameters of blood of patients with periprosthetic infection, statistically significant differences depending on the presence of CMD, were found in three parameters. Patients with disorders of carbohydrate metabolism had higher blood levels of glucose, creatinine and urea, which, however, remained within the normal range. Two biochemical parameters of the blood of patients of all four groups were beyond the standard limits — C-reactive protein and albumin-globulin ratio. In patients with endoprosthesis instability, bilirubin, creatinine, and albumin values changed depending on the presence of an infectious process in the joint, and creatinine and urea, depending on carbohydrate metabolism disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the presence of an infectious process or disorders of carbohydrate metabolism, these parameters require closer attention in the preoperative period in patients with endoprosthesis instability. Patients with periprosthetic infection of the hip joint with carbohydrate metabolism disorders require laboratory monitoring of kidney function, protein fractions, and C-reactive protein even with normal results of biochemical blood tests.

Comparison of the Accuracy of 2D and 3D Templating for Revision Total Hip Replacement

Revision hip arthroplasty is a challenging surgical procedure, especially in cases of advanced acetabular bone loss. Accurate preoperative planning can prevent complications such as periprosthetic fractures or aseptic loosening. To date, the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) templating has been evaluated only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. We retrospectively investigated the accuracy of 3D personalized planning of reinforcement cages (Burch Schneider) in 27 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Personalized 3D modeling and positioning of the reinforcement cages were performed using computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis of each patient and 3D templates of the implant. To evaluate accuracy, the sizes of the reinforcement cages planned in 2D and 3D were compared with the sizes of the finally implanted cages. Factors that may potentially influence planning accuracy such as gender and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed. There was a significant difference (p = 0.003) in the accuracy of correct size prediction between personalized 3D templating and 2D templating. Personalized 3D templating predicted the exact size of the reinforcement cage in 96.3% of the patients, while the exact size was predicted in only 55.6% by 2D templating. Regarding gender and BMI, no statistically significant differences in planning accuracy either for 2D or 3D templating were observed. Personalized 3D planning of revision hip arthroplasty using Burch Schneider reinforcement cages leads to greater accuracy in the prediction of the required size of implants than conventional 2D templating.

Strategy to avoid vascular injuries in revision total hip arthroplasty with intrapelvic implants.

Our objective was describing an algorithm to identify and prevent vascular injury in patients with intrapelvic components. Patients were defined as at risk to vascular injuries when components or cement migrated 5 mm or more beyond the ilioischial line in any of the pelvic incidences (anteroposterior and Judet view). In those patients, a serial investigation was initiated by a CT angiography, followed by a vascular surgeon evaluation. The investigation proceeded if necessary. The main goal was to assure a safe tissue plane between the hardware and the vessels. In ten at-risk patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty and submitted to our algorithm, six were recognized as being high risk to vascular injury during surgery. In those six high-risk patients, a preventive preoperative stent was implanted before the orthopaedic procedure. Four patients needed a second reinforcing stent to protect and to maintain the vessel anatomy deformed by the intrapelvic implants. The evaluation algorithm was useful to avoid blood vessels injury during revision total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open2022;3(11):859-866.

3D reconstruction protocol in complex acetabular defects

The current paper describes the protocol used in our clinic for 3D imaging, reconstruction and printing of complex acetabular defects that are used for surgical planning of complex acetabular defects. Surgical guides have also been developed to aid optimal acetabular reamer placement in order to recreate the optimal hip rotation centre for each patient undergoing revision hip arthroplasty that has impaired acetabular bone stock

Differential microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern in periprosthetic hip joint infections: a matched-cohort analysis comparing direct anterior versus lateral approach

BackgroundIn recent years, total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach (DAA) has become more common. Little is known on the influence of the surgical approach on the microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern in periprosthetic hip joint infections. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern in periprosthetic hip joint infections comparing the direct anterior versus lateral approach in a matched-cohort analysis at a single institution.MethodsPatients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty due to PJI following primary total hip arthroplasty with culture positive microbiology were analyzed. In all study patients, both the primary surgery and the revisions surgery were performed at the same institution. Only patients in whom primary surgery was performed via a direct anterior or lateral approach were included (n = 87). A matched cohort analysis was performed to compare the microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern in PJI following direct anterior (n = 36) versus lateral (n = 36) primary THA.ResultsWe identified both a significantly different microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern in PJI comparing direct anterior versus lateral approach THA. Cutibacterium avidum was obtained more frequently in the anterior subgroup (22.2% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.028). In the subgroup of infections with Staphylococcus aureus (n = 12), methicillin resistance was detected in 3/5 cases in the direct anterior group versus 0/7 cases in the lateral group (p = 0.045). Overall, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common causative microorganism in both groups (direct anterior: 36.1%; lateral: 27.8%, p = 0.448).ConclusionThe present study indicates a potential influence of the localization of the skin incision in THA on the microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern in PJI. Cutibacterium avidum seemed to be a more common causative microorganism in PJI in patients who underwent direct anterior compared to lateral approach THA.

Reproducibility of pathologic scoring systems for periprosthetic adverse local tissue reactions: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundSeveral previous studies have described broad histologic classifications of peri-prosthetic reactions that likely reflect the underlying mechanism of arthroplasty failure; however, a consensus has not yet been reached about the relative importance of individual observations. Question/PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner repeatability of commonly used histopathologic grading methods, and to determine the utility of assigning a more simple, global categorization in patients undergoing revision THA surgery of implants with a variety of bearing combinations. MethodsBetween March 2013 and February 2020, a total of 2131 patients underwent revision hip arthroplasty surgery at a one center, of which 12% (248 of 2131) of patients were enrolled. Two pathologists independently reviewed microscope slides of periprosthetic tissue from these patients, of which 425 slides (229 hips, 222 subjects) were reviewed by both pathologists. Separate slides were used for a priori training of the pathologists. Slides were evaluated with the Campbell Aseptic Lymphocyte-dominant Vasculitis-Associated Lesion (ALVAL) score, the Oxford ALVAL score as modified by Grammatopolous, the Fujishiro and Natu scores, and a proposed simplified pattern classification, similar to that of Krenn et al., that incorporates individual factors of these existing scoring methods and was previously shown to correspond to Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Gwet’s AC1 and AC2 coefficients and correspondence analysis was used to examine associations between individual factors of prior scoring methods with the proposed major pattern. ResultsAlmost perfect inter-rater repeatability (Gwet’s AC2 > 0.8) was found for 71% (15/21) of the individual factors, and substantial interrater agreement was found for the proposed major overall pattern (Gwet’s AC1: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.72–0.85). Correspondence analysis was able to explain 89–91% of data variability and was able to identify individual features not commonly associated with a major pattern, but discriminatory of the major pattern, such as “Lymph Cuff Thickness 0.25–0.5″ with ALVAL. ConclusionIn contrast to prior examinations, excellent interrater agreement was found that may be attributable to a priori training of raters with a test set of slides or difficulty of interpreting grading criteria. The proposed simplified major pattern classification may facilitate evaluation of histopathologic tissue samples.

Patients satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty

Background: Total hip arthroplasty is a surgery in which the diseased ball and socket of the hip joint is completely removed and replaced with artificial materials and satisfaction is a state felt by a person who has experienced a performance or an outcome that fulfill his or her expectation. Prevalence of total hip arthroplasty is 5.26%. Objectives: The objective of the study was to determine the patient satisfaction level after primary total hip arthroplasty. Methods: This was a descriptive cross sectional study with a sample size of 51 patients. Both genders are included with an age range of 45-65years and the patients who enrolled six months after surgery. Those patients were excluded who refused to participate in the study, those patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty and patients who have any congenital deformity of lower limb. A self-administrated patient-satisfaction questionnaire was used. The questionnaire was valid and reliable and used in a previous study. Data was analyzed by using Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS). Value of Cronbach's alpha was 0.86 which was considered highly reliable. Informed consent was obtained from every single patient. Results: Mean age of patients was 55.72, with range minimum 46 years to maximum 65 years. Satisfaction after six months of total hip arthroplasty in patients was somewhat high, 46.1% and the percentage of patients who were dissatisfied was 8.8%. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction is higher after total hip arthroplasty. Patients are satisfied with the result of the surgery, improving pain and improving functional activities.

Excellent Midterm Results of Triflange Patient Matched Implants for Extensive Acetabular Bone Defect.

PurposeReconstruction of extensive acetabular bone defects is one of the most challenging problems encountered by arthroplasty surgeons. Triflange patient matched implants (PMI) offer the potential advantages of immediate, rigid fixation with a superior individualized fit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic midterm results of PMI in extensive acetabular defect reconstruction.Materials and MethodsThe current prospectively designed retrospective review examined 13 consecutive patients (5 males and 8 females) with a mean age of 69 years undergoing revision hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type 3B acetabular defects reconstructed using PMI between October 2011 and December 2016. A successful result was defined as a postoperative increase in Harris hip score (HHS) of >20 points with a radiographically stable implant (assessed with hip X-rays) and no need for additional acetabular reconstruction.ResultsTwelve out of the 13 patients in the study were available for follow-up with mean duration of 50 months. One patient died during the study period due to an unrelated cause. The mean HHS increased from 41 to 82 points. Eleven out of 12 acetabular components were well fixed and pelvic discontinuity healed in all patients.ConclusionCustom triflange PMI is an excellent option for management of complex and extensive acetabular defects with or without pelvic discontinuity.

Diagnostic value of fluoroscopy-guided hip aspiration for periprosthetic joint infection.

To assess the value of preoperative joint aspiration in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty and to compare these with the clinical findings, serum markers, and intraoperative findings. Fluoroscopically guided hip aspirations in patients with pain after hip arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed from January 2014 to December 2018. All hips underwent subsequent revision hip arthroplasty. Antibiotics were discontinued at least 2weeks before the aspiration. The 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria served as a standard of reference for PJI. Clinical, serum, synovial, and intraoperative parameters were recorded in all patients. Correlations between all parameters with PJI diagnosis were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models with ROC analysis. In 202 hips that included 91 septic hips, hip aspiration (AUC = 0.78) and intraoperative (0.80) parameters performed better than serum-based tests (0.64) and clinical parameters (0.68) in detecting PJI. Using MSIS criteria as a standard of reference, hip aspiration had a sensitivity of 64.0% and an accuracy of 78.5% for cultures and a sensitivity of 74.2% and an accuracy of 82.1% for synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils% (PMN%). Results substantially improved sensitivity after excluding patients that were treated with antibiotics, particularly culture results. Preoperative hip aspiration showed good diagnostic performance in diagnosing PJI compared with MSIS criteria as a standard of reference. But a negative result from aspirate could not rule out PJI. Based on our findings, hip aspiration is an essential test for treatment planning in patients with pain after hip arthroplasty.

Comparison of clinical characteristics and 10-year survival rates of revision hip arthroplasties among revision time groups.

IntroductionNo significant regression has been reported in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rates despite substantial progress in implant technologies and surgical techniques. It is critical to investigate how patient demographics, THA indications, surgical techniques, types of implants, and other factors influence the frequency of early and late revision surgery. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and 10-year survival rates of revision hip arthroplasties among revision time groups.Material and methodsThe clinical data of 396 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty between 2005 and 2011 were evaluated in this multi-centre study. Patients were assigned to one of four revision time groups based on the interval between the index hip arthroplasty and the revision surgery (< 2, 2–5, 5–10, and > 10 years).ResultsThere were significant differences among revision time groups in terms of aetiology for primary hip arthroplasty, indications for revision hip arthroplasty, and types of revision procedures. Patients with hip dysplasia more frequently received revision hip arthroplasty within 2 years in contrast to those with osteoarthritis. Revision hip arthroplasties due to periprosthetic infection and instability were conducted earlier compared to aseptic loosening. The overall 10-year survival rate of revision hip arthroplasty was 83.2%, and it was highest for the very early revisions (< 2 years).ConclusionsAccording to our results, early revision hip arthroplasty was found to be mostly dependent on surgery-related factors rather than demographic factors. On the other hand, we observed that survival rates of very early revision hip arthroplasties are higher than late revision hip arthroplasties.

Is large femoral head a better option than a conventional femoral head primary total hip arthroplasty in Indian population

&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Study aimed to assess and compare the functional outcome in patients underwent the large femoral head THA and conventional femoral head THA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; It is a comparative prospective cross sectional study conducted among the patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty through postero-lateral approach at department of orthopaedics Vydehi institute of medical sciences, Bengaluru during the period of July 2017 to July 2019. Patients aged between 18-80years of both genders undergoing Primary THA for Osteoarthritis (OA), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Post traumatic arthritis, Avascular necrosis (AVN), Acute fracture neck of femur, Non-union fracture neck of femur (NOF). Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty in Intertrochanteric fracture, Acetabular fracture and patients undergoing Revision Hip Arthroplasty were excluded from study. Patients were grouped as the ones treated with large femoral head THA and conventional femoral head THA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;This series consisted of 36 patients with 44 diseased hips treated with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Out of 36 patients, 9 patients (25%) belonged to an age group of below 30 years of age, 10 patients (27.8%) belonged to the age group between 31-40 years of age, 8 patients (22.2%) belonged to the age group 41-51 years of age and 9 patients (25%) belonged to age group of 51-60 years of age. The mean level of Modified Harris Hip score and improvement of movements in all planes was found to be statistically significantly in the patients treated with large femoral head primary THA compared to those treated with conventional method. (p&amp;lt;0.001)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Study has shown improved functional outcome (Modified harris hip score) and range of movement in the patients treated with the large femoral head primary THA as compared to those treated with a conventional femoral head.&lt;/p&gt;