Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery Research Articles

Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries

ObjectiveThis study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and wound infiltration (WI) for postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients were divided into two groups: ESPB (n = 40) and WI (n = 40). Postoperative pain intensity was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS) at multiple time points within 24 h. Additionally, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction were evaluated.ResultsBoth ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, with no significant differences in VAS scores. However, the ESPB group demonstrated a significantly longer duration of analgesia, a shorter time to first rescue analgesia, and lower total tramadol consumption (50 ± 60 mg vs. 100 ± 75 mg; p = 0.010) than did the WI group. Furthermore, a trend toward reduced PONV incidence was observed in the ESPB group, likely due to its opioid-sparing effect.ConclusionWhile both ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, ESPB demonstrated a distinct advantage by offering a longer duration of analgesia and significantly reducing opioid consumption. These findings suggest that ESPB is more effective than WI for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal surgeries, providing prolonged pain relief and improving patient outcomes. Further studies are warranted to explore its long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.govPRS: NCT06567964 Date: 08/21/2024 Retrospectively registered.

Transthyretin amyloidosis in patients with spinal stenosis who underwent spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Accumulation of transthyretin amyloids (ATTR) is detected in ligamentum flavum in about 1/3 of patients underwent surgery for spinal stenosis. However, the significance of this finding is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the incidence and importance of ATTR in patients with spinal stenosis who underwent spinal surgery. The primary outcome measure was incidence of ATTR in patients with spinal stenosis. English language observational studies published within 10 years period were searched in Pubmed and Taylor and Francis databases. Nine articles were included in the systematic review. The incidence of positive ATTR among patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery was 48% (95%CI 38-58%). ATTR deposits were found in the lumbar region the most frequently. Seven studies showed that patients with positive ATTR were older than those with negative. Five studies investigated and found a significant relationship between the ligamentum flavum thickness and positive ATTR. Five studies investigated cardiac involvement among patients with positive ATTR. ATTR deposits are frequently found in older patients with spinal stenosis, especially in the lumbar region. The presence of ATTR deposits is related to ligamentum flavum thickness.

The cross-sectional area of gluteal muscle on multiaxial CT scan as a predictor for diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with degenerative lumbar disease.

This study examined the predictive value of the gluteal muscle index (GMI) for diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with degenerative lumbar disease (DLD), highlighting the need for effective diagnostic markers in this population. This prospective observational study included 202 elderly patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery. Muscle indices for psoas, paraspinal, and gluteal muscles were measured using multiaxial computed tomography. Sarcopenia was diagnosed per the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria. Statistical analysis comprised univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of sarcopenia. Of patients, 77% were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The GMI and psoas muscle index (PMI) were identified as significant predictors of sarcopenia in the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed their predictive value, with higher indices correlating with a reduced risk of sarcopenia (GMI odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.92-0.97; PMI OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92-0.98, both P < .001). The GMI serves as a reliable predictor of sarcopenia in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for DLD, suggesting a significant role of gluteal muscles in diagnosing sarcopenia. Incorporating GMI into clinical assessments is critical to better manage and diagnose sarcopenia in this population.

Comparison of Oswestry Disability Index Scores Between Surgical Candidates and General Population: Insights into Evaluation Criteria for Spine Surgery.

A mixed-methods investigation with both retrospective and prospective components. Determine the mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores for individuals who underwent surgical intervention compared to a non-surgical population and identify threshold values that distinguish between these groups. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) quantifies disability in patients with low back pain and commonly serves as a significant determinant in lumbar spine pathology and surgical outcomes. An empirically established ODI threshold can aid in optimizing surgical decision-making processes. This study retrospectively analyzed 557 patients who consulted with a spine surgeon and subsequently underwent lumbar spine surgery from 2019 to 2023. Additionally, ODI scores were surveyed from 797 individuals in the general American population using the CloudResearch Connect platform, with participants matched for age and sex according to US census data. Mean ODI scores stratified by age group and sex were calculated for each cohort. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized to ascertain ODI cutoff values for different demographics. The retrospective cohort demonstrated a higher disability level with an overall mean ODI of 34.7 (95% CI [33.1, 36.2]) for ages 18-89. In contrast, the general population surveyed had a mean ODI of 14.4 (95% CI [13.3, 15.4]). An ROC-derived ODI threshold of 16.5 within the comprehensive age group of 18-89 exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.68. The ODI values identified in this study offer benchmarks that can assist in the evaluation process for spine surgery. These findings highlight the importance of considering ODI scores as part of a comprehensive clinical evaluation, rather than as standalone indicators for surgical intervention. Further prospective validation of these findings and their integration into clinical practice is recommended for future research.

Thermographic assessment of skin temperature after lumbar spine surgery: Useful method for detection of wound complications? A pilot study.

Wound complications after lumbar spine surgery may result in prolonged hospitalization and increased morbidity. Early identification can trigger appropriate management. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of infrared-based wound assessment (FLIR) after lumbar spine surgery in the context of identifying wound healing disorders. 62 individuals who underwent lumbar spine surgery were included. The immediate postoperative course was studied, and the patient's sex, age, body mass index (BMI), heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, numeric rating scale for pain (NRS), C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte, and hemoglobin levels were noted and compared to thermographic measurement of local surface temperature in the wound area. Measurement of local surface temperature in the wound area showed a consistent temperature distribution while it was uneven in case of wound healing disorder. In this instance, the region of the wound where the wound healing disorder occured had a lower temperature than the surrounding tissue (p> 0.05). This study demonstrates the ongoing importance of clinical wound assessment for early detection of complications. While laboratory parameter measurement is crucial, FLIR may serve as a cost-effective supplemental tool in clinical wound evaluation. Patient safety risks appear minimal since local ST is measured without touch.

Mindfulness vs. Physiotherapy vs. Medical Therapy: Uncovering the Best Postoperative Recovery Method for Low Back Surgery Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Single Institution's Experience.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness therapy compared to traditional physiotherapy and usual care in alleviating postoperative pain and improving functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ninety patients undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF) who presented persistent low back pain after surgery were prospectively followed for one year. They were randomly divided into three groups: mindfulness therapy, physiotherapy, and medical therapy. The primary outcome was the improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score postoperatively and at six months follow-up. Both mindfulness and physiotherapy groups showed significant improvement in ODI scores compared to the control group, with mean variations of 10.6 and 11.6 points, respectively, versus 4.9 points in the control group. There was no significant difference between mindfulness and physiotherapy (p = 0.52), but both were superior to medical care (p < 0.0001 for physiotherapy and p = 0.0007 for mindfulness). This study demonstrated that mindfulness therapy is more effective than usual care in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. In our cohort, its efficacy was comparable to that of physiotherapy, making it a viable alternative, especially when access to healthcare services is restricted, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should validate the findings of this study and examine the long-term effects on surgical patient populations.

Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis.

Existing literature does not establish the superiority of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block or the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block in pain relief and reducing opioid consumption in lumbar spine surgeries. This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to discern their relative efficacy and safety. This meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESP and TLIP blocks in lumbar spine surgeries. The primary outcome was 24-h opioid consumption, and secondary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1 h and 24 h and various complications. PubMed, Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, EMBASE databases and cross-references were electronically searched. Two authors extracted data independently, cross-checked, and analysed them using RevMan 5.4. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR), while continuous outcomes were presented as standardised mean differences (SMDs) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Among 1107 articles, six RCTs (492 patients) were finally included. The ESP block demonstrated lower 24-h opioid consumption compared to TLIP [SMD -0.32 (95% CI: -0.50, -0.14); P < 0.001, I 2 = 83%]. At 1 and 24 h, ESPB yielded significantly lower VAS scores compared to TLIP [1 h: SMD -0.38 (95% CI: -0.57, -0.18); P < 0.001, I 2 = 83%; 24 h: SMD -0.57 (95% CI: -0.76, -0.37); P < 0.001, I 2 = 73%]. No significant difference was noted in adverse events. In comparison to the TLIP block, the ESP block has significantly lower 24-h opioid consumption and VAS scores at 1 and 24 h in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Using Multimodal Assessments to Reevaluate Depression Designations for Spine Surgery Candidates.

Depression is common in spine surgery candidates and may influence postoperative outcomes. Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) can overcome limitations of existing depression screening methods (e.g., recall bias, inaccuracy of historical diagnoses) by longitudinally monitoring depression symptoms in daily life. In this study, we compared EMA-based depression assessment with retrospective self-report (a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) and chart-based depression diagnosis in lumbar spine surgery candidates. We further examined the associations of each depression assessment method with surgical outcomes. Adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery (n = 122) completed EMAs quantifying depressive symptoms up to 5 times daily for 3 weeks preoperatively. Correlations (rank-biserial or Spearman) among EMA means, a chart-based depression history, and 1-time preoperative depression surveys (PHQ-9 and Psychache Scale) were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to categorize PHQ-9 questions as somatic or non-somatic; subscores were compared with a propensity score-matched general population cohort. The associations of each screening modality with 6-month surgical outcomes (pain, disability, physical function, pain interference) were analyzed with multivariable regression. The association between EMA Depression scores and a depression history was weak (rrb = 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14 to 0.52]). Moderate correlations with EMA-measured depression symptoms were observed for the PHQ-9 (rs = 0.51 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.63]) and the Psychache Scale (rs = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.76]). Compared with the matched general population cohort, spine surgery candidates endorsed similar non-somatic symptoms but significantly greater somatic symptoms on the PHQ-9. EMA Depression scores had a stronger association with 6-month surgical outcomes than the other depression screening modalities did. A history of depression in the medical record is not a reliable indication of preoperative depression symptom severity. Cross-sectional depression assessments such as PHQ-9 have stronger associations with daily depression symptoms but may conflate somatic depression symptoms with spine-related disability. As an alternative to these methods, mobile health technology and EMAs provide an opportunity to collect real-time, longitudinal data on depression symptom severity, potentially improving prognostic accuracy. Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Spaghetti Sign: Nerve Root Redundancy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) seen in conjunction with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are well-described radiographic findings. Several studies suggest their presence may be a negative prognostic indicator of postoperative outcome. Our hypothesis was that severe RNR (informally known as the spaghetti sign [SS]) can serve as a reliable marker of LSS that would benefit from surgical decompression. We sought to evaluate a grading scale for RNR, characterize the association with stenosis, and investigate the clinical implications of RNR. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 72 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery from 2016 to 2018 at 1 institution. Preoperative T2 magnetic resonance imaging scans were graded by 3 reviewers for severity of stenosis (0-4), severity of RNR (0-3), and rostral versus caudal RNR. SS was defined as RNR score ≥2 (clear-cut or marked nerve root irregularity). Preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index scores were analyzed by stenosis and RNR severity. Seventy-one (98%) patients had severe stenosis (score ≥3) and 25 (35%) had a SS. SS was 100% specific for high-grade stenosis. If patients had a SS, it was more likely rostral (P=0.02). Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index scores improved significantly, but there were no differences related to RNR score, presence of SS, or stenosis severity. The study demonstrated that there is a significant association between SS and severe LSS and that presence of RNR is not a negative prognostic indicator for postoperative outcomes.

Comparison of Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) Mode and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) Mode in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery in the Prone Position

Abstract Background The prone position is commonly required to enable surgical access during lumbar spine surgery. When a patient moves into the prone position, inferior vena cava obstruction causes reduced venous return and increase thoracic pressure results in reduced left ventricular compliance, leading to a decreased cardiac index (CI). Aim of the Work The aim of this study, we will compare the effects of the VCV and PCV on peak airway pressure (P peak), ETCO2 as a primary outcome ABG, SPO2, and hemodynamics as MAP, HR and as a secondary outcome in the prone position. Patients and Methods This prospective, single blinded study included 60 patients who assigned randomly into two equal groups: group A: patients on volume-controlled ventilation mode VCV and group B: patients on pressure-controlled ventilation mode PCV. Results Baseline characteristics (age, sex, BMI, ASA physical status, duration of anesthesia and surgery) were insignificantly different between both groups. Heart rate and MAP at supine and prone positions at all time measurements were insignificantly different between both groups. P peak and SpO2 at supine and prone positions at all time measurements were insignificantly different between both groups. Respiratory rate and ETCO2 at supine and prone positions at all time measurements were insignificantly different between both groups. Conclusion No significant difference between two modes of ventilation VCV and PCV in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position as regard P peak, ETCO2, SPO2, and hemodynamics.

Discrepancy between global- and disease-specific outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery.

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between patient-perceived changes in health and commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in lumbar spine surgery. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar decompression, or lumbar fusion at a single academic institution from 2017 to 2023. Correlation between the global rating of change (GRC) questionnaire, a 5-item Likert scale (much better, slightly better, about the same, slightly worse, and much worse), and PROMs (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale for back and leg pain, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary, and PROMIS physical function) was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. A total of 1871 patients (397 microdiscectomies, 965 decompressions, and 509 fusions) were included. A majority of patients in each group rated their lumbar condition as much better at each postoperative time point compared with preoperatively and reported improved health status at each postoperative time point compared with the previous follow-up visit. Statistically significant but weak to moderate correlations were found between GRC and change in PROM scores from the preoperative time point. Correlation between GRC and change in PROM scores from the prior visit showed some statistically significant correlations, but the strengths ranged from very weak to weak. A majority of patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy, decompression, or fusion endorsed notable improvements in health status in the early postoperative period and continued to improve at late follow-up. However, commonly used PROMs demonstrated very weak to moderate correlations with patient-perceived changes in overall lumbar spine-related health status as determined by GRC. Therefore, currently used PROMs may not be as sensitive at detecting these changes or may not be adequately reflecting changes in health conditions that are meaningful to patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

Lumbar spine surgery is associated with a significant degree of moderate-to-severe perioperative pain which can be alleviated by using different pain-relieving modalities; of these, erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine have promise. To compare the analgesic efficacy between intrathecal morphine (ITM) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. A total of 74 patients aged between 20 and 65 years of either sex were posted for elective lumbar spine surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients received 0.3 mg intrathecal morphine andGroup B received bilateral erector spinae plane block at L3 level by using 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine before starting the surgery for perioperative analgesia. In the perioperative period, pain was assessed by hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), numeric rating scale (NRS), and patient satisfaction score. Result: The difference in heart rate and mean arterial pressure was found to be statistically significant between groups at three, six, 12, and 24 hours (p<0.05). The patients who required rescue analgesia in Group A and Group B were 23 (62.2%) and 37 (100%) patients in the first 24 hours. The rate of complication was higher in Group A than in Group B (45% vs 5.4%). The patient satisfaction score was found to be better in Group A than in Group B. Intrathecal morphineprovides more substantial and extended analgesia up to 48 hours postoperatively as compared to erector spinae plane block.

Effectiveness of Electroacupuncture for Managing Urinary Retention Post Lumbar Spine Surgery: a retrospective single-cohort study.

Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a frequent complication following surgical procedures, characterized by an acute inability to void, leading to additional complications and extended hospitalization. Acupuncture has been shown to be effective in facilitating spontaneous urination and alleviating anxiety in patients experiencing poor urination. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of electroacupuncture in the management of POUR in patients who have undergone lumbar spine surgery. This retrospective study conducted at the National Hospital of Acupuncture in Vietnam and reviewed the medical records of patients over 18 years old who underwent lumbar spine surgery and were diagnosed with POUR between January to December 2019. Electroacupuncture was administered at five specific acupuncture points Qugu (CV2), Zhongji (CV3), Zhibian (BL54), Pangguanshu (BL28), and Kunlun (BL60). This study monitored key parameters related to the effectiveness of the acupuncture treatment, including the number of acupuncture treatment sessions required until a patient was successfully treated was recorded, with a maximum of three acupuncture treatment sessions per patient, the time elapsed until urination following the treatment (minutes), and urinary bladder volume before and after treatment (mL). The study demonstrated a 93.3% success rate in treating POUR with electroacupuncture. A significant reduction in post-void residual volume was noted, and patients could void within 30 minutes post-treatment. No significant differences in treatment effectiveness were observed across difference genders and age groups. Electroacupuncture proved to be a highly effective treatment for POUR in patients post-lumbar spine surgery, with a rapid response time and substantial reduction in PVR. However, the retrospective nature of the study and single-center focus limit its generalizability. Future research incorporating randomized controlled trials or multi-center observational studies are recommended to validate these findings and explore the potential of acupuncture in POUR management on a broader scale.

Leveraging machine learning to develop a postoperative predictive model for postoperative urinary retention following lumbar spine surgery.

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is the inability to urinate after a surgical procedure despite having a full bladder. It is a common complication following lumbar spine surgery which has been extensively linked to increased patient morbidity and hospital costs. This study hopes to development and validate a predictive model for POUR following lumbar spine surgery using patient demographics, surgical and anesthesia variables. This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 903 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery over the period of June 2017 to June 2019 in a tertiary academic medical center. Four hundred and nineteen variables were collected including patient demographics, ICD-10 codes, and intraoperative factors. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (LASSO) regression and logistic regression models were compared. A decision tree model was fitted to the optimal model to classify each patient's risk of developing POUR as high, intermediate, or low risk. Predictive performance of POUR was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). 903 patients were included with average age 60 ± 15 years, body mass index of 30.5 ± 6.4 kg/m2, 476 (53%) male, 785 (87%) white, 446 (49%) involving fusions, with average 2.1 ± 2.0 levels. The incidence of POUR was 235 (26%) with 63 (7%) requiring indwelling catheter placement. A decision tree was constructed with an accuracy of 87.8%. We present a highly accurate and easy to implement decision tree model which predicts POUR following lumbar spine surgery using preoperative and intraoperative variables.

Is an Elevated Preoperative CRP Level a Predictive Factor for Wound Healing Disorders following Lumbar Spine Surgery?

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 3019 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery over a decade in our department. The study aimed to assess the predictors of wound healing disorders, focusing on laboratory values, particularly inflammatory parameters. Of the 3019 patients, 2.5% (N = 74) experienced deep or superficial wound healing disorders, showing the significant correlation between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and these disorders (p = 0.004). A multivariate analysis identified several factors, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac comorbidity, surgical duration, dural injury, and blood loss, as being correlated with wound healing disorders. Demographic factors, pre-existing conditions, and perioperative variables play a role in the occurrence of adverse effects related to wound healing disorders. Elevated CRP levels serve as an indicator of increased infection risk, though they are not a definitive diagnostic tool for wound healing disorders.

Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to consolidate the evidence regarding the prognostic influence of sarcopenia in degenerative lumbar spine surgeries. A literature search of public databases was conducted up to Nov 15, 2023 using combinations of the key words "sarcopenia" and "lumbar spine surgery". Eligible studies were those that focused on adults undergoing decompression or fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases, and compared the outcomes between patients with and without preoperative sarcopenia. Primary outcomes were change in ODI and back and leg pain VAS pain scores. Secondary outcomes were changes in Eq.5D, JOA, SFHS-p scores, and LOS. Ultimately, nine retrospective studies with a total of 993 patients were included. Sarcopenic patients exhibited significantly worse functional improvement as assessed by ODI compared to non-sarcopenic patients (pooled standardized mean difference [pSMD] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.90). Back pain (pSMD = 0.31, 95% CI:0.15-0.47) and leg pain (pSMD = 0.21, 95% CI:0.02 - 0.39) improvement were also less in sarcopenic patients. Non-sarcopenic patients had greater improvements in Eq.5D (pSMD = 0.25) and SFHS-p (pSMD = 0.39), and shorter LOS (pSMD = 0.62). As compared to patients without sarcopenia, those with sarcopenia undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative diseases have lower improvements in functional ability, quality of life, physical health, pain relief and extended hospitalization compared to those without sarcopenia.

The effect of preemptive retrolaminar block on lumbar spinal decompression surgery.

Spinal decompression surgery causes severe pain. Retrolaminar block (RLB) is block, which is done by infiltration of local anesthetic to block spinal nerves between the lamina and superior costotransversospinalis muscle. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of RLB on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Secondary aims are effects on additional anesthetic and analgesic consumption. The sixty (60) patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery between May 2020 and May 2021 under general anesthesia with or without applied preemptive RLB for postoperative analgesia were included in this prospective observational study. Group I received ultrasound-guided preemptive RLB. In Group II, no intervention was performed. Postoperative VAS scores were compared in groups as primary outcome, perioperative additional anesthetic and analgesic needs were compared as secondary outcome. There was a significant difference between the groups in favor of the RLB group in terms of postoperative VAS scores at rest [1.33 (0.33-3.509)] and movement [2.40 (1.20-4.00)] (p < 0.001). Perioperative sevoflurane consumption was significantly low in block group (p < 0.001). Postoperative tramadol consumption was lower in Group I compared with Group II [Group 1: 200 (100-300); Group 2: 37.5 (0-200); p < 0.001]. Preemptive RLB may be used to reduce patients' pain in lumbar decompression surgery as well as to be part of a multimodal analgesia and anesthesia regimen to reduce anesthetic and analgesic drug consumption. Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT04209907).

Relationship between facet joint osteoarthritis and lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy: a cross-sectional study.

The paraspinal muscles play an essential role in the stabilization of the lumbar spine. Lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy has been linked to chronic back pain and degenerative processes within the spinal motion segment. However, the relationship between the different paraspinal muscle groups and facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA) has not been fully explored. In this cross-sectional study, the authors analyzed adult patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery between December 2014 and March 2023 for degenerative spinal conditions and had preoperative MRI and CT scans. The fatty infiltration (FI) and functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) of the psoas, erector spinae, and multifidus muscles were assessed on axial T2-weighted MR images at the level of the upper endplate of L4 based on established studies and calculated using custom-made software. Intervertebral disc degeneration at each lumbar level was evaluated using the Pfirrmann grading system. The grades from each level were summed to report the cumulative lumbar Pfirrmann grade. Weishaupt classification (0-3) was used to assess FJOA at all lumbar levels (L1 to S1) on preoperative CT scans. The total lumbar FJOA score was determined by adding the Weishaupt grades of both sides at all 5 levels. Correlation and linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between FJOA and paraspinal muscle parameters. A total of 225 patients (49.7% female) with a median age of 61 (IQR 54-70) years and a median BMI of 28.3 (IQR 25.1-33.1) kg/m2 were included. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, and the cumulative lumbar Pfirrmann grade, only multifidus muscle fCSA (estimate -4.69, 95% CI -6.91 to -2.46; p < 0.001) and FI (estimate 0.64, 95% CI 0.33-0.94; p < 0.001) were independently predicted by the total FJOA score. A similar relation was seen with individual Weishaupt grades of each lumbar level after controlling for age, sex, BMI, and the Pfirrmann grade of the corresponding level. Atrophy of the multifidus muscle is significantly associated with FJOA in the lumbar spine. The absence of such correlation for the erector spinae and psoas muscles highlights the unique link between multifidus muscle quality and the degeneration of the spinal motion segment. Further research is necessary to establish the causal link and the clinical implications of these findings.

A Comparative Study of Wound Infections Following Wound Closure Using Staples and Absorbable Sutures Among Obese Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Background Infections of the wounds, organs, or spaces that develop following surgery are known as surgical site infections (SSIs). Theincidence of wound infections in obese patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery with the use of absorbable sutures versus staples for skin closurehas not been studied previously. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective observational study in our hospital where cases of lumbar spine surgery meeting the inclusion criteria were chosen retrospectively from March 2021 to March 2023. A total of 40patients aged >18 years and <75 years who underwent lumbar spine surgery were covered by this investigation. Two cohorts with 20 patients in each were chosen from thepopulation. Group A used a skin stapler to close wounds, whereas group B used absorbable sutures. The number of wound infections was the main result. Using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY), all data were analyzed after being entered into an Excel sheet (MicrosoftCorp., Redmond, WA). Results A total of 40 participants were included in this study, and it revealed that there was no discernible variation in the groups' mean age or gender distribution. There is a significantly higher incidence of SSI in the absorbable suture group (35%) compared to the staplegroup (15%). The mean duration in days for the development of SSI in the absorbable suture group (9.86±2.12) was early compared to the staple group (12.67±2.08), which was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion Compared to absorbable sutures, the current study showed a decreased incidence of surgical site infection in obese individuals receiving skin staples for wound closure.

Hemodynamic changes in the prone position according to fluid loading after anaesthesia induction in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a randomized, assessor-blind, prospective study

Introduction A change from the supine to prone position causes hemodynamic alterations. We aimed to evaluate the effect of fluid preloading in the supine position, the subsequent hemodynamic changes in the prone position and postoperative outcomes. Patients and methods This prospective, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted between March and June 2023. Adults scheduled for elective orthopaedic lumbar surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. In total, 80 participants were randomly assigned to fluid maintenance (M) or loading (L) groups. Both groups were administered intravenous fluid at a rate of 2 ml/kg/h until surgical incision; Group L was loaded with an additional 5 ml/kg intravenous fluid for 10 min after anaesthesia induction. The primary outcome was incidence of hypotension before surgical incision. Secondary outcomes included differences in the mean blood pressure (mBP), heart rate, pleth variability index (PVi), stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume index and cardiac index before surgical incision between the two groups. Additionally, postoperative complications until postoperative day 2 and postoperative hospital length of stay were investigated. Results Hypotension was prevalent in Group M before surgical incision and could be predicted by a baseline PVi >16. The mBP was significantly higher in Group L immediately after fluid loading. The PVi, SVV and PPV were lower in Group L after fluid loading, with continued differences at 2–3 time points for SVV and PPV. Other outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion Fluid loading after inducing general anaesthesia could reduce the occurrence of hypotension until surgical incision in patients scheduled for surgery in the prone position. Additionally, hypotension could be predicted in patients with a baseline PVi >16. Therefore, intravenous fluid loading is strongly recommended in patients with high baseline PVi to prevent hypotension after anaesthesia induction and in the prone position. Trial number KCT0008294 (date of registration: 16 March 2023)