Undergoing Liver Surgery Research Articles

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder in surgical candidates for liver metastases: Prevalence, noninvasive diagnosis, and burden on surgical outcomes

Chemotherapy can cause vascular and metabolic liver injury in patients with liver metastases, but scarce data are available. We aimed to (i) describe the prevalence of porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) among patients undergoing resection for liver metastases; and (ii) assess whether liver (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurements could diagnose PSVD and predict postoperative complications. This is a prospective single-center study enrolling consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastases at a tertiary center. For each patient, we evaluated previous exposure to chemotherapy, comorbidities, elastography, type of surgery, histological features at the resection specimen, morbidity (post-hepatectomy liver failure and major complications according to Clavien-Dindo), and 90-day survival. Sixty-eight patients were included, of whom 60 (88%) had received chemotherapy. Twenty-nine (44%) patients had PSVD. Spleen stiffness measurements <21 kPa (negative predictive value 87%) and >40 kPa (positive predictive value 100%) could accurately diagnose PSVD. PSVD significantly increased the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (22% vs. 45%) and major complications (11% vs. 31%). Preoperative LSM was associated with postoperative morbidity. The cutoff LSMs <4.5 and >8 kPa predicted the risk of clinically significant post-hepatectomy liver failure (0%, 11%, and 33% in LSM <4.5, 4.5–8, and >8 kPa, respectively) and major complications (0%, 25%, 44% in LSM <4.5, 4.5–8, and >8 kPa, respectively). PSVD is very common among patients undergoing liver surgery for metastases, and it is associated with increased morbidity. LSM and spleen stiffness measurements can correctly identify patients with PSVD and those at risk of clinically relevant postoperative complications.

Efficacy and safety of robotic liver surgery for the elderly: A propensity-score matched analysis of short-term outcomes with open liver surgery at a single center in Denmark.

The incidence of liver tumors requiring surgical treatment continues to increase in elderly patients. This study compared the short-term results of robotic liver surgery (RLS) versus open liver surgery (OLS) for liver tumors in elderly patients. A prospective database including all patients undergoing liver surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital between July 2019 and July 2022 was managed retrospectively. Short-term surgical outcomes of the two main cohorts (OLS and RLS) and subgroups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) in elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with liver tumors. A total of 42 matched patients from each group were investigated: the RLS group had significantly larger tumor diameters, less blood loss (821.2 vs. 155.2 mL, p < .001), and shorter hospital stays (6.6 vs. 3.4 days, p < .001). Overall morbidity was comparable, while operative times were longer in the RLS group. The advantages observed with the robotic approach were replicated in the subgroup of minor liver resections. In patients ≥70 years, RLS for liver tumors results in significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays than OLS. RLS, especially minor liver resection, is safe and feasible in elderly patients with liver tumors.

Functional liver imaging score (FLIS) can predict adverse events in HCC patients

PurposeTo assess the performance of FLIS in predicting adverse outcomes, namely post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and death, in patients who underwent liver surgery for malignancies. MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent liver resection and 1.5 T gadoxetic acid MR were enrolled. PHLF and overall survival (OS) were collected. Two radiologists with 18 and 8 years of experience in abdominal imaging, blinded to clinical data, evaluated all images. Radiologists evaluated liver parenchymal enhancement (EnQS), biliary contrast excretion (ExQS), and signal intensity of the portal vein relative to the liver parenchyma (PVsQs). Reliability analysis was computed with Cohen’s Kappa. Cox regression analysis was calculated to determine which factors are associated with PHLF and OS. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed. Results150 patients were enrolled, 58 (38.7 %) in the HCC group and 92 (61.3 %) in the non-HCC group. The reliability analysis between the two readers was almost perfect (κ = 0.998). The multivariate Cox analysis showed that only post-surgical blood transfusions and major resection were associated with adverse events [HR=8.96 (7.98–9.88), p = 0.034, and HR=0.99 (0.781–1.121), p = 0.032, respectively] in the whole population. In the HCC group, the multivariable Cox analysis showed that blood transfusions, major resection and FLIS were associated with adverse outcomes [HR=13.133 (2.988–55.142), p = 0.009, HR=0.987 (0.244–1.987), p = 0.021, and HR=1.891 (1.772–3.471), p = 0.039]. The FLIS AUROC to predict adverse outcomes was 0.660 (95 %CIs = 0.484–0.836), with 87 % sensitivity and 33.3 % specificity (81.1–94.4 and 22.1–42.1). ConclusionsFLIS can be considered a promising tool to preoperative depict patients at risk of PHLF and death.

Minimally invasive tools are necessary for the modern practice of liver surgery.

Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is performed for other gastrointestinal applications. At our centre, all liver resections are systematically performed using a minimally invasive approach. This study aimed to describe our experience in minimising open surgery and emphasised the importance of minimally invasive surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 260 patients who underwent liver surgery and compared the surgical outcomes between the open and MILR groups. A total of 154 patients (68%) underwent MILR. The proportion of patients who underwent prior abdominal surgery and resection was higher in the open surgery group. However, the proportion of patients with liver cirrhosis was similar between the two groups. The MILR group was superior in terms of operative time, blood loss, Pringle manoeuvre rate and mean hospital stay. In addition, major complication and bile leak rates were lower in the MILR group. No significant differences in the tumour size, number of lesions or underlying liver pathology were observed between the two groups. Acceptable outcomes can be achieved even when the minimally invasive approach is considered the primary option for all patients who require liver resection. Minimally invasive tools are necessary for the modern practice of liver surgery; therefore, laparoscopic or robotic surgery should be included in the armamentarium of liver surgeons.

The effect of liver surgery and fluid strategy on renin activity and aldosterone and anti-diuretic hormone levels: a secondary analysis of the GALILEO trial

BackgroundIt is unknown whether liver surgery leads to increased RAAS activity and anti-diuretic hormone (ADH) levels and subsequent fluid accumulation. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the peri-operative fluid strategy changes this effect. MethodsThis is a pre-planned post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial which compared restrictive (n = 20) versus liberal fluid strategy (n = 20) in patients undergoing liver surgery. Primary outcomes for the current study were the difference in hormone levels after anaesthesia induction and after liver resection. Fluid overload was defined as a ≥10% increase in weight. ResultsRenin activity (6 [2.1–15.5] vs. 12 [4.6–33.5]) and ADH levels (6.0 [1.7–16.3] vs. 3.8 [1.6–14.7]) did not differ significantly before and after resection. However, aldosterone levels were significantly higher after resection (0.30 [0.17–0.49] vs. 0.69 [0.31–1.21] ). Renin activity and aldosterone levels did not differ between the groups. ADH was significantly higher in the restrictive strategy group (1.6 [1.1–2.1] vs 5.9 [3.8–16.0]). No differences in hormone levels were found in patients with and without fluid overload. DiscussionAldosterone levels increased after liver surgery but renin activity and ADH levels did not. ADH levels were higher in the restrictive group. Development of post-operative fluid overload was not associated with RAAS activity or ADH levels.

Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing liver resection.

The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has demonstrated significant advantages for patients by mitigating surgical stress and expediting recovery across a spectrum of surgical procedures worldwide. This investigation seeks to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol specifically in the context of major liver resections within our geographical region. Our department conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, gathered from consenting individuals who underwent liver resections from January 2018 to December 2023. The assessment encompassed baseline characteristics, preoperative indications, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications among patients undergoing liver surgery. Among the included 184 patients (73 standard care, 111 ERAS program), the baseline characteristics were similar. Median postoperative hospital stay differed significantly: 5 days (range: 3-13 days) in ERAS, and 11 days (range: 6-22 days) in standard care (p < 0.001). Prophylactic abdominal drainage was less in ERAS (54.9%) than in standard care (86.3%, p < 0.001). Notably, in ERAS, 88.2% initiated enteral feeding orally on postoperative day 1, significantly higher than in standard care (47.9%, p < 0.001). Early postoperative mobilization was more common in ERAS (84.6%) than in standard care (36.9%, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 21.9% in standard care, and 8.1% in ERAS (p = 0.004). Our investigation highlights the merits of ERAS protocol; adherence to its diverse components results in significant reduction in hospital length of stay, and reduced occurrence of postoperative complications, improving short-term recovery post liver resection.

Assessment by a multidisciplinary team conference affects treatment strategy and overall survival in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundThe aim of this retrospective observational study was to investigate the geographical or sex differences in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLM) in terms of assessment by a multidisciplinary team conference (MDT), curative treatment, and overall survival. MethodAll sCRLM patients in the South-East Health Care Region of Sweden from 2009 to 2015 were included (n = 615). Data were derived from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, Swedish Registry of Liver and Bile Surgery and medical records. ResultsPatients who had a hepatobiliary unit (HBU) at the nearest hospital were more likely to undergo liver surgery (HBU+, 37% (n = 106), compared to HBU−, 22% (n = 60); p = 0.001) and had a better median survival (p < 0.001). No sex differences were observed. In multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival, assessment by an MDT that included a liver surgeon was independently linked to better survival (HR 0.574, 0.433–0.760). ConclusionThere were no sex differences in access to liver surgery or overall survival, however, there were geographical inequalities, where residency near a hospital with HBU was associated with increased overall survival and the possibility to receive liver surgery. Assessment at MDT with liver surgeon present was associated with greater survival, indicating its important role for treatment.

From morbidity reduction to cost-effectiveness: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations in minimal invasive liver surgery

PurposeMinimal-invasive liver surgery (MILS) reduces surgical trauma and is associated with fewer postoperative complications. To amplify these benefits, perioperative multimodal concepts like Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS), can play a crucial role. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness for MILS in an ERAS program, considering the necessary additional workforce and associated expenses.MethodsA prospective observational study comparing surgical approach in patients within an ERAS program compared to standard care from 2018—2022 at the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Cost data were provided by the medical controlling office. ERAS items were applied according to the ERAS society recommendations.Results537 patients underwent liver surgery (46% laparoscopic, 26% robotic assisted, 28% open surgery) and 487 were managed by the ERAS protocol. Implementation of ERAS reduced overall postoperative complications in the MILS group (18% vs. 32%, p = 0.048). Complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade II incurred the highest costs (€ 31,093) compared to minor (€ 17,510) and no complications (€13,893; p < 0.001). In the event of major complications, profit margins were reduced by a median of € 6,640.ConclusionsEmbracing the ERAS society recommendations in liver surgery leads to a significant reduction of complications. This outcome justifies the higher cost associated with a well-structured ERAS protocol, as it effectively offsets the expenses of complications.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Remifentanil on Emergence Agitation During Awakening from Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Pediatric Liver Surgery.

BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex) combined with remifentanil on emergence agitation (EA) during awakening from sevoflurane anesthesia for pediatric liver surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty children who underwent liver surgery in our hospital were prospectively selected and randomly allocated into group A (placebo+remifentanil+sevoflurane) or group B (Dex+remifentanil+sevoflurane). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at different time points, agitation score during awakening, behavioral status, pain level, and the incidence of postoperative adverse effects were compared in both groups. RESULTS Children in group B had lower HR and MAP levels immediately after tracheal extubation and 5 min after tracheal extubation than those in group A. The Aono's scores, PAED agitation scores, and CHIPP scores at 15 min and 30 min of admission to the PACU were lower in group B than in group A. The incidence of agitation during postoperative anesthesia awakening was lower in group B in contrast to group A. There was no significant difference in postoperative adverse reactions between group A and group B. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric liver surgery, the use of Dex+remifentanil+sevoflurane anesthesia can reduce the incidence of EA during the awakening period, stabilize hemodynamic levels, and relieve postoperative pain, and has fewer postoperative adverse effects, which warrants clinical application.

Safety of perioperative intravenous lidocaine in liver surgery - A pilot study.

Perioperative lidocaine infusion has many interesting properties such as analgesic effects in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery. However, its use is limited in liver surgery due to its hepatic metabolism. This prospective, monocentric study was conducted from 2020 to 2021. Patients undergoing liver surgery were included. They received a lidocaine infusion protocol until the beginning of hepatic transection (bolus dose of 1.5 mg kg-1, then a continuous infusion of 2 mg kg-1 h-1). Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured four times during and after lidocaine infusion. Twenty subjects who underwent liver resection were analyzed. There was 35% of preexisting liver disease before tumor diagnosis, and 75% of liver resection was defined as "major hepatectomy." Plasmatic levels of lidocaine were in the therapeutic range. No blood sample showed a concentration above the toxicity threshold: 1.6 (1.3-2.1) μg ml-1 one hour after the start of infusion, 2.5 (1.7-2.8) μg ml-1 at the end of hepatic transection, 1.7 (1.3-2.0) μg ml-1 one hour after the end of infusion, and 1.2 (0.8-1.4) μg ml-1 at the end of surgery. Comparative analysis between the presence of a preexisting liver disease or not and the association of intraoperative vascular clamping or not did not show significant difference concerning lidocaine blood levels. Perioperative lidocaine infusion seems safe in the field of liver surgery. Nevertheless, additional prospective studies need to assess the clinical usefulness in terms of analgesia and antitumoral effects.

Enhanced recovery after liver surgery in cirrhotic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundFew studies have assessed enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in liver surgery for cirrhotic patients. The present meta-analysis assessed the impact of ERAS pathways on outcomes after liver surgery in cirrhotic patients compared to standard care.MethodsA literature search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing ERAS protocols versus standard care in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery were included. The primary outcome was post-operative complications, while secondary outcomes were mortality rates, length of stay (LoS), readmissions, reoperations, and liver failure rates.ResultsAfter evaluating 41 full-text manuscripts, 5 articles totaling 646 patients were included (327 patients in the ERAS group and 319 in the non-ERAS group). Compared to non-ERAS care, ERAS patients had less risk of developing overall complications (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31–0.61, p < 0.001). Hospitalization was on average 2 days shorter for the ERAS group (mean difference − 2.04, 95% CI − 3.19 to − 0.89, p < 0.001). Finally, no difference was found between both groups concerning 90-day post-operative mortality and rates of reoperations, readmissions, and liver failure.ConclusionIn cirrhotic patients, ERAS protocol for liver surgery is safe and decreases post-operative complications and LoS. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the results of the present analysis.

Implementation of an ERAS protocol on cirrhotic patients in liver resection: a cohort study.

The development of laparoscopic liver surgery, the improvement in the perioperative care programs, and the surgical innovation have allowed liver resections on selected cirrhotic patients. However, the great majority of ERAS studies for liver surgery have been conducted on patients with normal liver parenchyma, while its application on cirrhotic patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of an ERAS protocol in cirrhotic patients who underwent liver surgery. We present an analytical observational prospective cohort study, which included all adult patients who underwent a liver resection between December 2017 and December 2019 with an ERAS program. We compare the outcomes in patients cirrhotic (CG)/non-cirrhotic (NCG). A total of 101 patients were included. Thirty of these (29.7%) were patients ≥ 70 cirrhotic. 87% of the both groups had performed > 70% of the ERAS. Oral diet tolerance and mobilization on the first postoperative day were similar in both groups. The hospital stay was similar in both groups (2.9days/2.99days). Morbidity and mortality were similar; Clavien I-II (CG: 44% vs NCG: 30%) and Clavien ≥ III (CG: 3% vs NCG: 8%). Hospital re-entry was higher in the NCG. Overall mortality of the study was 1%. ERAS protocol compliance was associated with a decrease in complications (ERAS < 70%: 80% vs ERAS > 90%: 20%; p: 0.02) and decrease in severity of complications in both study groups. The application of the ERAS program in cirrhotic patients who undergo liver surgery is feasible, safe, and reproducible. It allows postoperative complications, mortality, hospital stay, and readmission rates comparable to those in standard patients.

Outcomes of liver surgery: A decade of mandatory nationwide auditing in the Netherlands

BackgroundIn 2013, the nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit (DHBA) was initiated. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in indications for and outcomes of liver surgery in the last decade. MethodsThis nationwide study included all patients who underwent liver surgery for four indications, including colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and intrahepatic– and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA – pCCA) between 2014 and 2022. Trends in postoperative outcomes were evaluated separately for each indication using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses. ResultsThis study included 8057 procedures for CRLM, 838 for HCC, 290 for iCCA, and 300 for pCCA. Over time, these patients had higher risk profiles (more ASA-III patients and more comorbidities). Adjusted mortality decreased over time for CRLM, HCC and iCCA, respectively aOR 0.83, 95%CI 0.75–0.92, P < 0.001; aOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.75–0.99, P = 0.045; aOR 0.40, 95%CI 0.20–0.73, P < 0.001. Failure to rescue (FTR) also decreased for these groups, respectively aOR 0.84, 95%CI 0.76–0.93, P = 0.001; aOR 0.81, 95%CI 0.68–0.97, P = 0.024; aOR 0.29, 95%CI 0.08–0.84, P = 0.021). For iCCA severe complications (aOR 0.65 95%CI 0.43–0.99, P = 0.043) also decreased. No significant outcome differences were observed in pCCA. The number of centres performing liver resections decreased from 26 to 22 between 2014 and 2022, while median annual volumes did not change (40–49, P = 0.66). ConclusionOver time, postoperative mortality and FTR decreased after liver surgery, despite treating higher-risk patients. The DHBA continues its focus on providing feedback and benchmark results to further enhance outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures (PROM/PREM) in Patients Undergoing Liver Surgery with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®): An Exploratory Study.

ERAS® (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) is an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach focusing on optimizing outcomes after surgery through structured clinical pathways. This study aimed to assess patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM/PREM), which are not routinely assessed after liver surgery within an ERAS® protocol. Routine outcome parameters were extracted from clinical documentation. Using qualitative content analysis, PROM and PREM were retrospectively identified in 13 case records. In a prospective survey of 10 participants, PROM was assessed at three timepoints using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. PREM were collected at discharge. The following PROM categories occurred in the retrospective content analysis: appetite (84.6%), pain/discomfort (76.9%), mobility (69.2%), wound condition (69.2%), and weight (61.5%). The categories of continuity of care (92.0%) and information, communication, education (69.0%) emerged as PREM. Descriptive changes in health state were shown for all EQ-5D-5L dimensions and timepoints. At discharge, mobility, selfcare, usual activities, and pain/discomfort tended to be worse, whereas anxiety/depression decreased gradually from preoperatively to the 4 week follow-up. There was high satisfaction with interprofessional care services and experienced cooperation between professionals. PROM and PREM are helpful to incorporate patients' perspectives after liver surgery within an ERAS® pathway and should be collected routinely in clinical practice.

Comparison of the LiMAx test vs. the APRI+ALBI score for clinical utility in preoperative risk assessment in patients undergoing liver surgery – A European multicenter study

IntroductionPosthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains the main reason for short-term mortality after liver surgery. APRI+ALBI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio (APRI) combined with albumin-bilirubin grade (ALBI), score and the liver function maximum capacity test (LiMAx) are both established preoperative (preop) liver function tests. The aim of this study was to compare both tests for their predictive potential for clinically significant PHLF grade B and C (B+C). Materials and methods352 patients were included from 4 European centers. Patients had available preop APRI+ALBI scores and LiMAx results. Predictive potential for PHLF, PHLF B+C and 90-day mortality was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calculation of the area under the curve (AUC). Published cutoffs of ≥ −2.46 for APRI+ALBI and of <315 for LiMAx were assessed using chi-squared test. ResultsAPRI+ALBI showed superior predictive potential for PHLF B+C (N = 34; AUC = 0.766), PHLF grade C (N = 20; AUC = 0.782) and 90-day mortality (N = 15; AUC = 0.750). When comparing the established cutoffs of both tests, APRI+ALBI outperformed LiMAx in prediction of PHLF B+C (APRI+ALBI ≥2.46: Positive predictive value (PPV) = 19%, negative predictive value (NPV) = 97%; LiMAx <315: PPV = 3%, NPV = 90%) and 90-day mortality (APRI+ALBI ≥2.46: PPV = 12%, NPV = 99%; LiMAx <315: PPV = 0%, NPV = 94%) ConclusionIn our analysis, APRI+ALBI outperformed LiMAx measurement in the preop prediction of PHLF B+C and postoperative mortality, at a fraction of the costs, manual labor and invasiveness.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Postoperative Arrhythmia after Liver Surgery.

New-onset postoperative arrhythmia (PA) has previously been described as a pivotal risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality after visceral surgery. However, there is a lack of data concerning liver surgery. The incidence and impact of new-onset postoperative arrhythmia after liver surgery was, therefore, analyzed in a monocentric study. In total, n = 460 patients (221 female, 239 male) who underwent liver surgery between January 2012 and April 2020 without any prior arrhythmia in their medical history were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical monitoring started with the induction of anesthesia and was terminated with discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate care unit (IMC). Follow-up included documentation of complications during the hospital stay, as well as long-term survival analysis. Postoperative arrhythmia after liver surgery was observed in 25 patients, corresponding to an incidence of 5.4%. The occurrence of arrhythmia was significantly associated with intraoperative complications (p < 0.05), liver fibrosis/cirrhosis (p < 0.05), bile fistula/bile leakage/bilioma (p < 0.05), and organ failure (p < 0.01). Survival analysis showed a significantly poorer overall survival of patients who developed postoperative arrhythmia after liver surgery (p < 0.001). New-onset postoperative arrhythmia after liver surgery has an incidence of only 5.4% but is significantly associated with higher postoperative morbidity and poorer overall survival.

Enhanced therapeutic outcomes with atezolizumab-bevacizumab and SIRT combination compared to SIRT alone in unresectable HCC: A promising approach for improved survival

BackgroundIntegrating immunotherapy with locoregional therapies marks a significant milestone in the realm of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment . This study aimed to assess the impact of addition of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab (AtezoBev) on the outcome patients treated with SIRT. MethodsWe conducted a study that included all Child-Pugh A HCC treated with SIRT since 2017. We examined the effects of the addition of 3 infusions of AtezoBev before the SIRT procedure and after SIRT on patients outcome (AtezoBev-SIRT group). Time-to-event data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test. ResultsThirty five HCC patients treated with SIRT were included, of whom 23 % also received AtezoBev infusions. The two groups were similar in terms of liver function and HCC parameters. The median OS was not reached for patients who received AtezoBev in combination with SIRT and 14 months for patients only treated by SIRT. The median PFS was higher in the group treated by SIRT and AtezoBev vs SIRT alone (11.3 months vs 5.8 months). In the global cohort, 8 patients presented a downstaging (23 %), 4 underwent liver surgery (1 in the AtezoBev-SIRT group) and 4 liver transplantation (1 in the AtezoBev-SIRT group) ConclusionsThe administration of AtezoBev, both before and after SIRT, is associated with enhanced OS and PFS outcomes compared to SIRT alone for unresectable HCC.

Textbook outcome in elderly patients undergoing liver surgery

Textbook outcome in elderly patients undergoing liver surgery

Diagnostic Accuracy of Plain Computed Tomography to Detect the Morphological Variations of Liver: An Update

Introduction: The prevalence of accessory fissures (AFs) in the liver ranges from 6% to 56%, as reported by cadaveric studies, which is much higher than the prevalence of 25% on computed tomography (CT) scans. Despite reporting many morphological variations in the liver by various cadaveric studies worldwide, the imaging studies are very few. Radiological imaging of patients undergoing liver surgery is a routine preoperative investigation. Despite there are several occasions where liver variations occur as a surprise during surgery which reflects on the diagnostic capacity of CT. Materials and Methods: Sixty cadaveric livers removed and stored in 10% Formalin were studied for all morphological abnormalities. The same livers were analyzed separately by anatomists by gross examination and radiologists by plain CT imaging. The radiologists were blinded from the gross examination findings. The data obtained by both methods were compared and the diagnostic accuracy of CT was estimated. Results: The common surface morphological variations detected were AFs, accessory lobes (ALs), pons hepatis (PH), and multilobed caudate and quadrate lobes (QLs). Out of the total 89 AFs identified by gross examination, only 73 could be detected by CT scan, thus the sensitivity of CT scan in detecting AFs is 82%. Similarly, the sensitivity of CT scan in detecting ALs, PH, and multilobed caudate, and QL was 64% (low), 81%, and 19% (very low), respectively. Thus, plain CT has variable sensitivity depending on the morphological variation. Conclusions: This study has highlighted some of the diagnostic inaccuracies that may arise during plain CT examination of the liver in a person posted for liver surgery or a person with abdominal trauma. Contrast-enhanced CT scans can circumvent many of these problems. Lack of awareness of these issues may affect the normal course of treatment and prognosis in such patients.

The Association between Preoperative Vitamin D Levels and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Liver Metastasis Surgery.

(1) Background: Over the past several years, there has been a renewed interest with regard to the effect of pre-operative vitamin D levels on post-surgical outcomes. Pre-operative vitamin D deficiency has been associated with many negative post-operative outcomes. However, the role of vitamin D in postoperative outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection is relatively uninvestigated. Our study investigated the correlation between preoperative vitamin D levels and postoperative complications in patients undergoing resection for CRLM. (2) Methods: We retrospectively examined the post-operative course of 109 patients, who were evaluated based upon preoperative vitamin D levels: the first group had vitamin D levels less than 25 nmol/L (VIT D < 25 nmol/L) (n = 12) vs. the second group who had vitamin D levels equal to or greater than 25 nmol/L (VIT D ≥ 25 nmol/L) (n = 97). (3) Results: Patients with lower pre-operative vitamin D levels (VIT D < 25 nmol/L) had significantly higher rates of blood transfusions (33.3% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.01), post-operative surgical complications (50% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.009), and infectious complications (25% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.04). However, there was no difference in overall survival seen between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that patients with preoperative vitamin D deficiency (defined as preoperative vitamin D levels less than 25 nmol/L) may have an increased risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer.