Underwent Emergency Laparotomy Research Articles

Oxygenation Index and Oxygen Saturation Index for Predicting Postoperative Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The OI was originally evaluated as a prognostic tool for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children and was an independent predictor for mortality in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Oxygenation index and OSI of 201 adult patients undergoing emergency surgery were evaluated at different time points. The primary objective of this study was to find the correlation between OI and OSI. The secondary objectives were to find the prognostic utility of OI and OSI for postoperative mechanical ventilation and mortality. Significant statistical correlation was found between OI and OSI both at the beginning (r 2 = 0.61; p < 0.001) and immediately after surgery (r 2 = 0.47; p < 0.001). Oxygen saturation index at the beginning [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) (95% CI) 0.76 (0.62-0.89); best cutoff 3.9, sensitivity 64% and specificity 45%] and immediately after surgery [AUROC (95% CI) 0.82 (0.72-0.92); best cutoff 3.57, sensitivity 79%, and specificity 62%] were reasonable predictors of the requirement of invasive ventilatory support. Exploratory analysis reported that older age (p = 0.02), higher total leukocyte count (p = 0.002), higher arterial lactate (p = 0.02), and higher driving pressure (p < 0.001) were independently associated with hospital mortality. In adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy under general anesthesia, OI and OSI were found to be correlated. Both metrics demonstrated reasonable accuracy in predicting the need for invasive ventilatory support beyond 24 hours and hospital mortality. Thakuria R, Ernest EE, Chowdhury AR, Pangasa N, Kayina CA, Bhattacharjee S, et al. Oxygenation Index and Oxygen Saturation Index for Predicting Postoperative Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):645-649.

The value of frailty assessments in older surgical patients undergoing emergency laparotomies in Singapore

Mortality in emergency laparotomy (EL) far exceeds that of elective bowel surgery, and standards for the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) in the UK were introduced due to the high mortality within 1 month of EL.1 In Singapore, 30-day mortality varies between 5.4% and 14.7% after EL.2,3 However, 30-day mortality in older patients has been reported to be as high as 31.5%.3

Assessing the impact of frailty in elderly patients undergoing emergency laparotomies in Singapore.

The global rise in ageing populations poses challenges for healthcare systems. By 2030, Singapore anticipates a quarter of its population to be aged 65 or older. This study addresses the dearth of research on frailty's impact on emergency laparotomy (EL) outcomes in this demographic, emphasising the growing significance of this surgical intervention. Conducted at 2 tertiary centres in Singapore from January to December 2019, a retrospective cohort study examined EL outcomes in patients aged 65 or older. Frailty assessment, using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), was integrated into demographic, diagnostic and procedural analyses. Patient data from Tan Tock Seng Hospital and Khoo Teck Puat Hospital provided a comprehensive view of frailty's role in EL. Among 233 participants, 26% were frail, revealing a higher vulnerability in the geriatric population. Frail individuals exhibited elevated preoperative risk, prolonged ICU stays, and significantly higher 90-day mortality (21.3% versus 6.4%). The study illuminated a nuanced connection between frailty and adverse outcomes, underlining the critical need for robust predictive tools in this context. Frailty emerged as a pivotal factor influencing the postoperative trajectory of older adults undergoing EL in Singapore. The integration of frailty assessment, particularly when combined with established metrics like P-POSSUM, showcased enhanced predictive accuracy. This finding offers valuable insights for shared decision-making and acute surgical unit practices, emphasising the imperative of considering frailty in the management of older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Effect of surgeon's seniority and subspeciality interest on mortality after emergency laparotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate effect of surgeon's seniority (trainee surgeon vs. consultant surgeon) and surgeon's subspeciality interest on postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL). A systematic review was conducted and reported according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the PRISMA statement standards, respectively. We evaluated all studies comparing the risk of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing EL between (a) trainee surgeon and consultant surgeon, and (b) surgeon without and with subspeciality interest related to pathology. Random effects modelling was applied for the analyses. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Analysis of 256 844 patients from 13 studies showed no difference in the risk of postoperative mortality between trainee-led and consultant-led EL (OR: 0.76, p = 0.12). However, EL performed by a surgeon without subspeciality interest related to the pathology was associated with a higher risk of postoperative mortality compared with a surgeon with subspeciality interest (OR: 1.38, p < 0.00001). In lower gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies, EL done by upper GI surgeons resulted in higher risk of mortality compared with lower GI surgeons (OR: 1.43, p < 0.00001). In upper GI pathologies, EL done by lower GI surgeons resulted in higher risk of mortality compared with upper GI surgeons (OR: 1.29, p = 0.05). While confounding by indication cannot be excluded, level 2 evidence with moderate certainty suggests that trainee-led EL may not increase the risk of postoperative mortality but EL by a surgeon with subspeciality interest related to the pathology may reduce the risk of mortality.

National Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Cirrhotic Blunt Trauma Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy Versus Non-operative Management: A Propensity Case-Matched Analysis.

This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes among severely injured trauma patients presenting with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries with a pre-diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) undergoing emergency laparotomy vs nonoperative management (NOM). This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File (ACS-TQIP-PUF) dataset from 2017 to 2021. Adults (≥18years) with a pre-existing diagnosis of LC who presented with severe blunt (ISS ≥ 16) isolated solid organ abdominal injuries and underwent laparotomy or NOM were included. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and in-hospital complications such as acute renal failure and deep vein thrombosis. 929 patients were included in this analysis, with 355 undergoing laparotomy and 574 managed nonoperatively. Laparotomy patients suffered greater in-hospital mortality (n = 186, 52.3% vs n = 115, 20.0%; P < .01), required significantly more blood within 4hours (8.9 units vs 4.3 units, P < .01), and had a significantly longer ICU-LOS (10.2days vs 6.7days, P < .01). In the 1:1 propensity score matched analysis of 556 matched patients, in-hospital mortality was greater for laparotomy patients (52.3% vs 20.0%, P < .01). Laparotomy was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched trauma patients, longer ICU-LOS, and more blood products given at 4hours compared to NOM. These findings illustrate that NOM may be a safe approach in managing severely injured trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries and a pre-diagnosis of LC.

Validation of the emergency surgery score (ESS) in a UK patient population and comparison with NELA scoring: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

Accurate risk scoring in emergency general surgery (EGS) is vital for consent and resource allocation. The emergency surgery score (ESS) has been validated as a reliable preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes in EGS but has been studied only in the US population. Our primary aim was to perform an external validation study of the ESS in a UK population. Our secondary aim was to compare the accuracy of ESS and National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) scores. We conducted an observational cohort study of adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy over three years in two UK centres. ESS was calculated retrospectively. NELA scores and all other variables were obtained from the prospectively collected Emergency Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Scottish Audit (ELLSA) database. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respectively. A total of 609 patients were included. Median age was 65 years, 52.7% were female, the overall mortality was 9.9% and 23.8% were admitted to ICU. Both ESS and NELA were equally accurate in predicting 30-day mortality (c-statistic=0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.85) for ESS and c-statistic=0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.88) for NELA, p=0.196) and predicting postoperative ICU admission (c-statistic=0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.81) for ESS and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) for NELA, p=0.092). In the UK population, ESS and NELA both predict 30-day mortality and ICU admission with no statistically significant difference but with higher c-statistics for NELA score. Both scores have certain advantages, with ESS being validated for a wider range of outcomes.

Comparison of Xylazine and Lidocaine Infusion versus Medetomidine Continuous Rate Infusion during General Anesthesia with Isoflurane in Horses Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy.

(1) The main goals of general anesthesia include pain management and a safe anesthetic protocol for smooth recovery. In this retrospective study, we compared two anesthetic protocols for general anesthesia with isoflurane during emergency laparotomy: sedation with xylazine and the intraoperative infusion of lidocaine (X group) versus medetomidine as a preoperative sedation and intraoperative infusion (M group). (2) The medical records of horses who underwent emergency laparotomies between 2016 and 2023 were reviewed. According to the anesthetic protocol, patients were allocated to the X or M groups. Data about the horse, signalment, history, and anesthetic variables were analyzed. (3) Group X had a significantly higher heart rate (HR), lower respiratory rate (RR) and mean and diastolic arterial pressure (MAP/DAP). A progressive increase in HR and RR was observed in both groups. Group X underwent a decrease in RR and an increase in DAP. In Group M, a decrease in MAP and DAP was observed. Group M exhibited a longer recovery time with similar recovery scores. Both protocols provided safe anesthesia for emergency laparotomy, with minor cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Minor respiratory depression was detected when xylazine was used, while recovery was longer with medetomidine.

Is barbed better? Evaluation of triclosan-coated barbed suture on wound complications following emergency laparotomy.

Emergent laparotomy is associated with significant wound complications including surgical site infections (SSIs) and fascial dehiscence. Triclosan-coated barbed (TCB) suture for fascial closure has been shown to reduce local complications but primarily in elective settings. We sought to evaluate the effect of TCB emergency laparotomy fascial closure on major wound complications. Adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were prospectively evaluated over 1 year. Patients were grouped into TCB versus polydioxanone (PDS) for fascial closure. Subanalysis was performed on patients undergoing single-stage laparotomy. Primary outcomes were SSI and fascial dehiscence. Multivariate analysis identified independent factors associated with SSI and fascial dehiscence. Of the 206 laparotomies, 73 (35%) were closed with TCB, and 133 (65%) were closed with PDS. Trauma was the reason for laparotomy in 73% of cases; damage-control laparotomy was performed in 27% of cases. The overall rate of SSI and fascial dehiscence was 18% and 10%, respectively. Operative strategy was similar between groups, including damage-control laparotomy, wound vac use, skin closure, and blood products. Surgical site infection events trended lower with TCB versus PDS closure (11% vs. 21%, p = 0.07), and fascial dehiscence was significantly lower with TCB versus PDS (4% vs. 14%, p < 0.05). Subanalysis of trauma and nontrauma cases showed no difference in SSI or fascial dehiscence. Multivariable analysis found that TCB decreased the likelihood of fascial dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.07; p < 0.05) following emergency laparotomy. Increased odds of fascial dehiscence were seen in damage-control laparotomy (odds ratio, 3.1; p < 0.05). Emergency laparotomy fascial closure with TCB showed significantly decreased rates of fascial dehiscence compared with closure with PDS and a strong trend toward lower SSI events. Triclosan-coated barbed suture was independently associated with decreased fascial dehiscence rates after emergency laparotomy. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

A three-year retrospective analysis of variables and their relationships as outcome indicators following emergency laparotomies in octogenarians: insights from a single institutional experience

Background: This retrospective study aims to specifically assess the morbidity and mortality outcomes linked to emergency laparotomies in a subset of patients aged 80 years and above, referred to as octogenarians. The objective is to gain insights into the specific challenges and outcomes faced by this elderly population undergoing emergency laparotomies. Methods: This retrospective analysis focused on emergency laparotomies in octogenarians between June 2020 and June 2023, involving 62 cases out of 370 total emergency laparotomies conducted across various age groups. Using a standardized proforma, data was collected, and statistical analysis was performed with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS). Results: In this study involving 62 elderly patients (mean age 84) undergoing emergency laparotomies, common diagnoses included adhesional small bowel obstruction (32.3%)and large bowel obstruction due to diverticular disease (21.0%). Approximately 22.6% of cases were malignant, emphasizing the diverse nature of the cohort. A significant portion (56.5%) underwent bowel resection, and 16.1% had a stoma. Notably, 100% of patients were not seen by geriatrics, indicating potential gaps in comprehensive assessment despite the absence of geriatrician involvement, the overall mortality rate was 21%, emphasizing the potential impact of geriatrician reviews. Conclusions: In summary, emergency major abdominal surgery poses significant risks, particularly for frail and elderly individuals with multiple co-morbidities. Recognizing frailty as an independent risk factor is crucial and highlights areas of potential improvement in this area with early involvement of geriatricians.

Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: 11 Case-Series Study in 2 Years at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the management, clinical features and outcome of caesarean scar pregnancies. Study Design: Descriptive case series. Settings: Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad Pakistan. Duration: Two years from 1st June 2019 to 31st May 2021. Methods: Medical records of the women with diagnosis of CSP were retrieved. The study included cases with gestational ages ranging from 5 weeks to 9 weeks who were referred to us. All the information regarding demographics, age, gestational age, symptoms at presentation, number of Caesarean sections, obstetric and gynecological history, ultrasound images, treatment given to the patients and hospital stay were retrieved from charts of the patients. Results: In this study, 11 cases of CSP were treated. One patient had pain in lower abdomen, two of 11 patients had no symptoms, 3 had lower abdominal pain with vaginal bleeding and 5 had vaginal bleeding only. All patients had history of caesarean sections. Gestational age of these patients was from 5 to 9 weeks. Five patients were treated with Methotrexate (MTX), 3 underwent emergency laparotomy and 3 were managed conservatively. Conclusion: Early diagnosis and management of patients having caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies can reduce the complications associated with this condition.

Evaluating the Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) in Predicting Postoperative Outcomes Following Emergency Laparotomy: Insights From an Indian Tertiary Center.

To determine the predictive value of Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) with regard to mortality and morbidity rates of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The ESSranging from 0 to 29 is an extensive risk calculator based on 22 variables including important parameters like demographics, preoperative treatment, comorbidities, and laboratory values. Twenty patients who underwent emergency laparotomy were preoperatively assessed and ESS was calculated for each. After establishment of diagnosis and resuscitation, the patient was taken up for emergency laparotomy. Postoperatively, patients were monitored clinically as well as with laboratory and radiological investigations as per case needed till discharge and further followed up physically in OPD/ward or interviewed telephonically for 30 days on a weekly basis. Incidence of mortality and morbidity in terms of postoperative complications, ICU admission, reoperation and readmission among the cases occurring within 30 days of procedure were recorded. ESS correlated well with the outcome in the current study, 10 out of 14 patients with score less than 8 were discharged without any complications. Mean ESS was higher among non-survivors. Ability of ESS to predict postoperative mortality, morbidity and ICU stay was proven statistically with c-statistics of 0.853, 0.84, 0.879 respectively. ESS was found to be a good predictor for the development of postoperative lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (c-statistic=0.828), sepsis (c-statistic=0.867), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (c-statistic=0.805), acute kidney injury (AKI) (c-statistic=0.804). ESS showed poor correlation with reoperation and readmission rates. The current study underscores the critical importance of employing risk stratification throughESSfor patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. By employing ESS, healthcare professionals can accurately anticipate resuscitation requirements and stabilize patients preoperatively. This proactive approach enables the identification and optimization of patients unsuitable for immediate surgery, facilitating informed decisions on targeted treatment, surgical intervention, and postoperative care pathways.

Association between frailty, long-term mortality and functional outcomes for older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy.

An increasing number of older patients are undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL). Frailty is thought to contribute to adverse outcomes in this group. The best method to assess frailty and impacts on long-term mortality and other important functional outcomes for older EL patients have not been fully explored. A prospective multicenter study of older EL patients was conducted across four hospital sites in New Zealand from August 2017 to September 2022. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used to measure frailty-defined as a CFS of ≥5. Primary outcomes were 30-day and one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity, admission for rehabilitation, and increased care level on discharge. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted, adjusting for age, sex, and ethnicity. A total of 629 participants were included. Frailty prevalence was 14.6%. Frail participants demonstrated higher 30-day and 1-year mortality-20.7% and 39.1%. Following adjustment, frailty was directly associated with a significantly increased risk of short- and long-term mortality (30-day aRR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5, 4.3, p=<0.001, 1-year aRR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5, 2.8, p<0.001). Frailty was correlated with a 2-fold increased risk of admission for rehabilitation and propensity of being discharged to an increased level of care, complications, and readmission within 30days. Frailty was associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality up to 1-year and other functional outcomes for older patients undergoing EL. Identification of frailty in older EL patients aids in patient-centered decision-making, which may lead to improvement in outcomes.

O26: Sarcopenia versus clinical frailty scale in predicting the risk of postoperative mortality after emergency laparotomy: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract Objectives To compare predictive significance of sarcopenia and clinical frailty scale (CFS) in terms of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Methods In compliance with STROCSS statement standards a retrospective cohort study with prospective data collection approach was conducted. The study period was between January 2017 and January 2022. All adult patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pathology who underwent emergency laparotomy in our centre were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality. The predictive value of sarcopenia and CFS were compared using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 1043 eligible patients were included. The risk of 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality were 8%, 10%, and 11%, respectively. ROC curve analysis suggested that sarcopenia is a significantly stronger predictor of 30-day mortality (AUC: 0.87 vs 0.70, P&amp;lt;0.0001), in-hospital mortality (AUC: 0.79 vs 0.67, P=0.0011), and 90-day mortality (AUC: 0.79 vs 0.67, P=0.0009) compared with CFS. Moreover, multivariable binary logistic regression analysis identified sarcopenia as an independent predictor of mortality [Coefficient: 4.333, OR: 76.16 (95% CI 37.06-156.52), P&amp;lt;0.0001] but not the CFS [Coefficient: 0.096, OR: 1.10 (95% CI 0.88–1.38), P=0.4047]. Conclusions Sarcopenia is a stronger predictor of postoperative mortality compared with CFS in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. It cancels out the predictive value of clinical frailty scale in multivariable analyses; hence among the two variables, sarcopenia deserves to be included in preoperative predictive tools.

O25: Accuracy of NELA score in predicting the risk of mortality following emergency laparotomy in patients aged above and below 80: A cohort study

Abstract Objectives To compare accuracy of National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) score in predicting the risk of mortality following emergency laparotomy in patients aged above and below 80. Methods In compliance with STROCSS statement standards a retrospective cohort study was conducted. The study period was between January 2017 and January 2022. All adult patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pathology who underwent emergency laparotomy in two centres were included. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Hosmer &amp; Lemeshow test were conducted to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of NELA score in predicting the risk of 30-day mortality in patients aged above and below 80 years. Results A total of 1458 eligible patients were included; 289 patients were aged above 80 with median age of 84 (IQR 81-87) and 1168 patients were aged below 80 with median age of 60 (IQR 46-71). The risk of 30-day mortality was 13.5 % in the above 80 group and 8% in the below 80 group. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of NELA score was 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.83) in the above 80 group and 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.91) in the below 80 group. The score was not well-calibrated for either groups. Conclusions The NELA score is less accurate in predicting the risk of mortality following emergency laparotomy in patients aged above 80 compared to younger patients. This may be explained by the fact that it does not take into account the measures of age-related decline in physical status of the patients.

Evaluation of Outcomes of Subcutaneous Negative Suction Drain in Emergency Laparotomy in Children with Peritonitis

Background: Emergency laparotomy for peritonitis is associated with the highest rates of infective complication, especially surgical site infection (SSI) and it's linked to higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of subcutaneous negative suction drain in emergency laparotomy in children with peritonitis. Methodology: This prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka from January, 2020 to December 2021 over a period of two years. A total of 64 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy with features of peritonitis were enrolled in this study as per selection criteria. They were divided into two groups equally. Subcutaneous negative suction drain was used in Group A patients, and in Group B patient’s standard of care was provided. Patients were followed up to 30thpostoperative day. Outcome was evaluated by superficial surgical site infection (s-SSI), wound dehiscence, secondary suturing and duration of hospital stay. Superficial surgical site infection(s-SSI) assessed by CDC criteria of surgical site infection on 3rd, 5th, 7th, 14th&amp; 30thpostoperative day. Microsoft Excel was used for data analysis. Results: Mean age of the study populations in Group A was 8.41 ± 2.27 years and Group B was 8.95 ± 2.27 years. Male were predominant than female in both the two groups. s-SSI was observed significantly(p=0.016) lower in Group A (9.4%) than Group B (34.4%). Culture &amp; sensitivity growth was observed significantly(p=0.020) lower in Group A (6.3%) than Group B (28.1%). Wound dehiscence was (9.4%) in Group A and (28.1%) in Group B. Secondary suturing was (3.1%) and (15.6%) in Group A and Group B respectively. Duration of hospital stay was found significantly (p=0.011) lesser in Group A than Group B (6.68 ± 2.14 vs 8.50 ± 3.29) days. Conclusion: Subcutaneous negative suction drain reduces the post-operative superficial ..

Blunt Trauma-Induced Diaphragmatic Hernia: Surgical Strategy and Outcomes

Blunt trauma-induced diaphragmatic hernia (DIH) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. Prompt diagnosis and management are crucial for successful outcomes. We present the case of a 40-year-old male who sustained blunt abdominal and chest trauma resulting in a left DIH with extensive gastrointestinal involvement. The patient underwent emergency laparotomy with primary repair of the diaphragmatic defect and resection of gangrenous stomach and bowel segments. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well and was discharged on day 14. Diagnosis of DIH relies on high clinical suspicion and radiological imaging, with CT scan being the modality of choice. Management involves surgical repair, either by primary closure or with the use of mesh, depending on the extent of the injury and presence of infection. Mortality rates are high in emergency repairs, especially when associated with bowel necrosis and perforation. This case highlights the importance of early recognition and timely intervention in DIH. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for DIH in patients presenting with a history of trauma and respiratory or abdominal symptoms. Improving awareness and understanding of abdominal injuries in trauma centers can help in early diagnosis and appropriate management, ultimately leading to better outcomes for patients with DIH.

Effectiveness of Continuous versus Interrupted Closure of Midline Wound in Emergency Laparotomies in Terms of Wound Dehiscence

Background: Midline laparotomy is widely recognized as the preferred technique for abdominal surgeries due to its simplicity and the effective exposure it provides. Despite its prevalence, the optimal method for closing the incision remains a topic of debate among surgeons, particularly when balancing the risk of wound dehiscence with the practicalities of surgical practice. The mechanical properties of suture materials and techniques, such as continuous versus interrupted suturing, directly influence wound integrity during the critical postoperative period. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and complication rates of continuous versus interrupted suturing techniques in midline laparotomies, with a focus on the incidence of wound dehiscence. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 180 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, divided into two groups: continuous closure (Group A) and interrupted closure (Group B). The study was conducted at Lady Reading Hospital MTI, Peshawar, with ethical committee approval. Participants were informed, consented, and demographic data were recorded. Suture techniques were performed by an experienced surgeon, and patients were monitored for wound dehiscence up to the 15th postoperative day. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results: Group A reported a wound dehiscence rate of 14.4%, with an effectiveness rate of 85.6%. In comparison, Group B showed a significantly lower dehiscence rate of 5.6% and an effectiveness rate of 94.4%. The age-wise distribution of effectiveness indicated no statistically significant difference between the groups across various age ranges, with P-values ranging from 0.2766 to 0.6037. Gender-wise, males and females also did not show significant differences in effectiveness between the two groups. Conclusion: Interrupted suturing for midline laparotomy closures showed a lower incidence of wound dehiscence compared to continuous suturing. However, factors such as increased surgery time and cost, along with postoperative issues like stitch sinus formation, need consideration. Further large-scale studies are recommended to evaluate the long-term outcomes and provide a more comprehensive assessment of the two techniques.

Quality of life after emergency laparotomy: a systematic review

BackgroundEmergency laparotomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure that has higher post-operative morbidity and mortality than elective surgery. Previous research has identified that patients valued postoperative quality of life (QoL) more than the risk of mortality when deciding to undergo emergency surgery. Current pre-operative scoring and risk stratification systems for emergency laparotomy do not account for or provide prediction tools for post-operative QoL. This study aims to systematically review previous literature to determine post-operative QoL in patients who undergo emergency laparotomy.MethodsA literature search was undertaken in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify studies measuring post-operative QoL in patients who have had emergency laparotomy up to 29th April 2023. Mean QoL scores from the studies included were combined to calculate the average effect of emergency laparotomy on QoL. The primary outcome of the review was postoperative QoL after emergency laparotomy when compared with a comparator group. Secondary outcomes included the quality of included studies.ResultsTen studies in the literature assessing the QoL of patients after emergency laparotomy were identified. Three studies showed that patients had improved QoL and seven showed worse QoL following emergency laparotomy. Length of time for QoL to return to baseline varied ranged from 3 to 12 months post-operatively. Length of hospital stay was identified as an independent risk factor for poorer QoL post-surgery.ConclusionsOutcome reporting for patients who undergo emergency laparotomy should be expanded further to include QoL. Further work is required to investigate this and elicit factors that can improve QoL post-operatively.

Intra-abdominal Pressure Measurement as a Predictor of Postoperative Wound Complications in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Introduction Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) hampers the effective functioning of intra- and extra-abdominal organs. Despite the abundance of knowledge, routine measurement of IAP still needs to be widely incorporated in managing at-risk patients. The present study intends to assess the need for IAP measurement on abdominal wound healing in emergency laparotomy patients. Methods This prospective study was carried out over 24 months in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The IAP was measured at admission, immediately after surgery, and during the early postoperative period at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The patients were evaluated for the development of wound-related complications over a follow-up period of three months post-operatively. Results Seventy-two patients were enrolled. At admission, 54 (75%) patients had intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), of which three patients had evidence of abdominal compartment syndrome. Thirty-one (43%) patients developed postoperative wound infections. The overall incidence of wound infection was significantly higher in patients with IAH (54.3% vs. 24%, p-value = 0.04, Pearson's Chi-squared test). The frequency of wound dehiscence was greater (19.6 % vs. 4.3 %, p-value 0.14, Fischer's exact test) in patients with IAH. The median duration of hospital stay (13 vs. 8 days, p-value 0.02, Mann-Whitney U test) and healing time (30.5 vs. 18 days, p-value 0.02, Mann-Whitney U test) was significantly higher in patients with IAH. Conclusion Measurement of IAP is a relatively simple procedure that should be incorporated into the routine postoperative care of surgical patients. The presence of elevated IAP can identify the subset of patients at risk of increased postoperative wound complications.

Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) scoring system in predicting postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: A retrospective study.

There is paucity of studies on preoperative risk assessment tools in patients undergoing emergency surgery. The present study evaluated the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification system in patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy. This retrospective study included 60 adult patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy for perforation peritonitis. The clinical details, ASA PS classification, laboratory investigations and postoperative course of patients were retrieved from their medical records. Based on these details, APACHE II and ACS-NSQIP were calculated for the patients. The study's primary outcome was the accuracy of the preoperative APACHE II, ACS-NSQIP risk calculator and ASA PS class in predicting the postoperative 30-day mortality of patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of APACHE II, ACS-NSQIP score, and ASA PS classification for mortality 30 days after surgery was 0.737, 0.694 and 0.601, respectively. The P value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test of scoring systems was 0.05, 0.25 and 0.05, respectively. AUC for postoperative complications was 0.799 for APACHE II, 0.683 for ACS-NSQIP and 0.601 for ASA PS classification. H-L test of these scoring systems for complications after surgery revealed P values of 0.62, 0.36 and 0.53, respectively. Compared to the ACS-NSQIP and ASA PS classification system, the APACHE II score has a better discriminative ability for postoperative complications and mortality in adult patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy.