Undertreatment Of Pain Research Articles

32 A randomized controlled trial of virtual reality-based distraction for intravenous cannulation-related distress in children

Abstract Background Children commonly experience under-treated pain and distress related to medical procedures, such as intravenous insertions (IVI), leading to both short- and long-term negative consequences for patients and their caregivers. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising tool to ameliorate procedure-related distress in the paediatric healthcare setting; however, existing evidence has largely employed custom VR software, which can be expensive and inaccessible. As such, we aimed to characterize whether commercially available VR applications are effective in reducing children’s procedure-related distress. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of commercially available VR-based distraction when added to standard of care (SOC, which included topical anesthetic cream), in reducing distress for children undergoing IVI in the paediatric emergency department (PED). Design/Methods Children aged 6 to 17 years requiring IVI in a Canadian PED were recruited for a two-arm randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was child distress, measured using the Observational Scale of Behavioural Distress – Revised (OSBD-R, score range 0-23.5). Secondary outcomes included child pain intensity (measured with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, score range 0-10) and caregiver anxiety [measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-S), score range 20-80] during the procedure. Trial registration number: NCT04291404C. Results 82 children and their caregivers were included. 41 children received VR distraction in addition to SOC (mean age 10.8 years, SD 3.0), while 41 children received SOC alone (mean age 11.3 years, SD 2.8). There was no significant difference between OSBD-R-measured distress in the VR arm (mean 1.05, SD 1.52) compared to the SOC arm (mean 0.71, SD 1.40) (p = 0.08). There was no significant reduction in procedural pain intensity in the VR group (mean 4.20,SD 3.10) compared to the SOC group (mean 4.10, SD 3.20) (p = 0.85). There was no difference in caregiver STAI-S score immediately following IVI in the VR arm (mean 32.3, SD 11.3) versus the SOC arm (mean 32.3, SD 11.9) (p = 0.86). Conclusion VR distraction therapy employing commercially available software was not associated with reduction in procedural distress or pain, above that provided with SOC in the PED, for children undergoing IVI. This result highlights the need for more accessible custom VR distraction software, created to meet the unique psychological needs of children undergoing medical procedures. Further study is needed to directly compare custom versus commercially available VR software for this application.

A conceptual model for assessing the risk of unidentified pain

Untreated or undertreated pain is well established as a significant problem, but unidentified pain is a distinct construct that still needs to be clearly modeled or fully described. This paper aims to develop a conceptual model of unidentified pain in humans with the goal of future development of an unidentified pain risk tool. A multi-phase process was employed consisting sequentially of 1) brainstorming followed by consensus building, 2) peer-review and publication of an integrative theoretical review protocol for “unidentified pain,” 3) conduct of the integrative review, and 4) a repeated brainstorming session to identify areas of risk for unidentified pain to produce a conceptual model. Brainstorming led to a consensus on “unidentified pain” as the concept of interest, followed by developing a review protocol. Twenty-four abstracts were reviewed after database searches, and four articles were included for full-text review. Three pain risk areas (hazards) were identified: cognition/communication problems, being alone or in the absence of a surrogate/proxy report, and the presence of known painful conditions or treatments and a conceptual model was developed. The hazards are posited to have the potential to both interact and be cumulative, increasing the risk for unidentified pain. There is currently no risk tool for assessing unidentified pain. The development of this conceptual model will be used for future development and psychometric testing of a tool to recognize the risk for unidentified pain in humans. PerspectiveThis focus article describes the development a conceptual model for the concept of unidentified pain in humans. This pain may occur in individuals who experience one or more interactive and cumulative hazards: cognition/communication problems, being alone, absence of a surrogate/proxy report, or presence of known painful conditions or treatments.

The Role of the Cardiac Surgery Patient in Pain Management: The Patient Perspective.

One and a half million cardiac surgeries are completed worldwide each year where undertreated postoperative pain increases the risk of patient morbidity and mortality. Patient-centered pain management is recommended to improve patient outcomes but there is insufficient information regarding how the patient views their role. The objective of this study is to explore cardiac surgery patients' perspectives on their role in postoperative pain management. This study used an interpretive phenomenological design and convenience sampling. Six participants who had undergone cardiac surgery were recruited from a cardiac rehabilitation program in Western Canada. The first author conducted semi-structured digitally recorded interviews. Sociodemographic characteristics and measures of anxiety and depression were also collected. Emergent thematic analysis of the qualitative data generated three themes: attitude, coping and care, and communication. The findings of this study address a gap in the literature with regard to patients' perceived roles in pain management. There is a complex relationship between patient attitude, coping and care, and communication which, in turn, influences how patients view their role within the pain management continuum. These themes contribute to the development of the patient role within the pain management continuum and form an integrated feedback loop. The patient's attitude contributes to their ability to cope with pain and participate in pain assessment and management. Furthermore, their ability to cope and desire to participate influences the development of their attitude. These findings may enhance providers' understanding of the patient's perspective and improve pain management outcomes.

Assessment and Treatment of Pain in Hospitalized Children at a Tertiary Children's Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Survey.

(1) Background: Acute pain in hospitalized children remains under-recognized and under-treated. Our objective is to benchmark pain assessment, documentation, treatment, and patient experience in children admitted to a US children's hospital. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-method survey of pain for children hospitalized ≥24 h. Charts were reviewed for modalities of pain assessment and treatment for all inpatients. If pain was documented, patients/caregivers were surveyed regarding their experience with pain and its management. (3) Results: Chart review: All 107 patients had ≥1 pain score documented. A total of 47 patients had a pain score ≥0, 35 (74.5%) of whom had ≥1 moderate-severe score. Seventy (65.4%) patients received ≥1 intervention for pain, including medications from ≥1 class (e.g., opioids) (n = 55, 51.4%) and/or integrative/non-pharmacologic intervention(s) (n = 39, 36.4%). There were assessment and documentation gaps. Patient survey: A total of 39 (83.0%) interviews were attempted; 25 (53.2%) were completed. The worst pain was mostly caused by acute illness (n = 13, 52%) and painful procedures (n = 10, 40%). Suggestions for improvement included increasing the use of integrative modalities and optimizing patient-clinician communication. (4) Conclusions: All patients admitted ≥24 h had ≥1 pain score documented; however, gaps in documentation were common. Multimodal treatment and integrative modalities were underutilized. Procedures were a frequent cause of under-treated pain, prompting an institution-wide quality improvement project.

Improving Pain Self-Management Among Rural Older Adults With Cancer

Undertreated cancer pain is a major public health concern among older adults in rural communities. Interventions to improve pain management among this vulnerable population are needed. To test the feasibility, acceptability, and changes in pain outcomes from exposure to an adapted intervention, Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (CA-HELP), to improve patients' communication about pain to their clinicians. Older adults with cancer (aged ≥65 years) who were residing in a noninstitutional rural setting and receiving outpatient care at a rural-based clinic in Tennessee were enrolled in the study, in which everyone received the intervention, in May 2022. All patients were given assessments at baseline and 1 week after intervention. Mean score differences were analyzed using 1-tailed paired sample t tests (α = .05). Data were analyzed in June 2022. The adapted version of CA-HELP included an 18-page patient-facing workbook and a 30-minute telephone coaching call with a registered nurse to coach patients on pain education and communication techniques to discuss pain with their medical team. Feasibility was examined through accrual and completion rates. Acceptability was measured by helpfulness, difficulty, and satisfaction with the intervention. Changes in outcomes were measured using mean score differences from pre-post assessments of pain self-management, self-efficacy for communicating with clinicians about pain, patient-reported pain, and misconceptions about pain. Among the 30 total participants, the mean (SD) age was 73.0 (5.1) years; 17 participants (56.7%) were female, 5 (16.7%) were Black or African American, 30 (100%) were non-Hispanic or non-Latino, 24 (80.0%) were White, 16 (53.3%) had less than a high school education, and 15 (50.0%) reported income less than $21 000 per year. Based on accrual and completion rates of 100%, this intervention was highly feasible. Fidelity rates for delivering intervention components (100%) and communication competence (27 participants [90%]) were also high. Regarding acceptability, all patients rated the intervention as helpful, with the majority (24 participants [80%]) rating it as "very helpful." Most patients rated the intervention as "not at all difficult" (27 participants [90%]), enjoyed participating (21 participants [70%]), and reported being "very satisfied" (25 participants [83.3%]). Pre-post changes in outcomes suggested significant improvements in pain self-management and self-efficacy for communicating with clinicians about pain, as well as significant reductions in patient-reported pain and pain misconceptions. In this case-series study of CA-HELP, results suggested the adapted version of CA-HELP was feasible and acceptable and showed changes in pain-related outcome measures among older adults with cancer in a rural setting.

Chronic shoulder pain due to spinal accessory nerve palsies present opportunities for improved care integration.

Aim: Chronic shoulder pain due to iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve (SAN) injury continues to be under-recognized, resulting in delayed time-to-diagnosis and poorer outcomes. Solutions are needed to improve the management of this condition, which can be challenging as care needs to be coordinated across pain management, neurophysiology, rehabilitationand reconstructive surgery.Cases: We present a series of sixpatients with shoulder pain refractory to conservative pain treatments to highlight how SAN injuries continued to be missed and treatment delayed, even at advanced care centers. The time to diagnosis of SAN palsy took an average of 21months and treatment was inconsistent for all patients.Discussion: None of the sixcases had initial suspicion of SAN palsy and only onepatient received targeted SAN injury care. SAN treatment should be started as early as possible so that patients can be referred for prompt surgical evaluation if they fail conservative management. Integrated care pathways may be a solution for formalizing multidisciplinary team involvement and improving SAN injury outcomes.Conclusion: Systemic processes, such as integrated care pathways, are needed to optimize early recognition and targeted treatment of SAN injury and may be beneficial for other underdiagnosed and undertreated neuropathic pain conditions.

Pharmacological treatment of pain in Swedish nursing homes: Prevalence and associations with cognitive impairment and depressive mood.

Chronic pain is highly prevalent in nursing home residents and often occurs with depression as well as cognitive impairment, which can severely influence and limit the expression of pain. The present cross-sectional study aimed to estimate the prevalence of pain, depressive mood, and cognitive impairment in association with pharmacological treatment against pain and depressive symptoms among Swedish nursing home residents. We found an overall pain prevalence of 52.8%, a prevalence of 63.1% for being in a depressive mood, and a prevalence of cognitive impairment of 68.3%. Among individuals assessed to have depressive mood, 60.5% were also assessed to have pain. The prevalence of pharmacological treatment for pain was 77.5 and 54.1% for antidepressants. Prescription of pharmacological treatment against pain was associated with reports of currently having pain, and paracetamol was the most prescribed drug. A higher cognitive function was associated with more filled prescriptions of drugs for neuropathic pain, paracetamol, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which could indicate an undertreatment of pain in those cognitively impaired. It is important to further explore the relationship between pain, depressive mood, and cognitive impairment in regard to pain management in nursing home residents.

A real-world study of the quality of Outpatient Pain Management in patients with Cancer.

Up to 40% patients with cancer reporting pain may not receive optimal analgesia indicating inadequate treatment of pain. We examined the patterns of outpatient pain management in patients with cancer who reported pain. We used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for outpatient visits from 2006 to 2018 for patients with any cancer and reporting pain. The primary outcome was prescription of pain medications among these patients. We performed multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with analgesic prescriptions among patients with cancer who reported pain. We captured an estimated total of 412 million outpatient visits of which 22 million visits dealt with patients with cancer reporting pain. An estimated total of 13.8 million (61.33%) patient visits had pain reported but were not prescribed any pain medications. 5.5 million (24.44%) patient visits had non-opioid analgesic prescription while opioid analgesics were prescribed during 3.2 million (14.22%) visits. Patients who were black, aged 45-64 years, residing in rural geographical areas, visiting medical subspecialty practices, and having cancers of the respiratory and digestive systems had higher odds of receiving opioid prescription. As one of the largest pain management studies among patients with cancer in the outpatient setting, covering 412 million patient visits, our study shows that a significant proportion of patients with cancer who reported pain did not receive a prescription for analgesics suggesting a possibility of undertreatment of pain. Undertreatment of pain continues to remain a major unmet need in patients with cancer.

Pain Management in Pediatric Patients: Evidence-Based Practices and Future Directions for Pediatric Surgical Nurses

This article provides an overview of managing pain in the pediatric population for the surgical nurse. Proper assessment of pediatric pain, newborn to age 18, is reviewed, including appropriate pain scales and self-report of pain. Pain management, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches, is stated. Innovative practices such as virtual reality and educational tool kits for families are reviewed. Special considerations in the pediatric population, including undertreatment of pain in infants, preprocedural pain treatment, and postoperative pain, are included. The importance of educating, aligning expectations, and communicating among the healthcare team, patients, and families is discussed.

Opioid Dose Reductions by Sex and Race in a Cohort of Patients in a Family Medicine Clinic.

The 2022 Centers for Disease Control's "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Pain in United States" called for attention and action toward reducing disparities in untreated and undertreated pain among Black and Latino patients. There is growing evidence for controlled substance safety committees (CSSC) to change prescribing culture, but few have been examined through the lens of health equity. We examined the impact of a primary care CSSC on opioid prescribing, including by patients' race and sex. We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Our primary outcome was a change in prescribed morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at baseline (2017) and follow-up (2021). We compared the differences in MME by race and sex. We also examined potential intersectional disparities. We used paired t test to compare changes in mean MME's and logistic regression to determine associations between patient characteristics and MME changes. Our cohort included 93 patients. The mean opioid dose decreased from nearly 200 MME to 136.1 MME, P < .0001. Thirty percent of patients had their dose reduced to under 90 MME by follow-up. The reduction rates by race or sex alone were not statistically significant. There was evidence of intersectional disparities at baseline. Black women were prescribed 88.5 fewer MME's at baseline compared with their White men counterparts, P = .04. Our findings add to the previously documented success of CSSCs in reducing opioid doses for chronic nonmalignant pain to safer levels. We highlight an opportunity for primary care based CSSCs to lead the efforts to identify and address chronic pain management inequities.

Child and Parent Risk and Resilience Factors as Predictors of Long-term Recovery in Youth Undergoing Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Undertreated pediatric postsurgical pain negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functioning and may lead to chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Predictors of recovery have been identified but more research is needed, particularly regarding resilience, social factors, and long-term effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate child and parent risk and resilience factors as predictors of long-term postsurgical recovery for adolescents. Participants were patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), 12 to 18 years old, undergoing spinal fusion, and their parents. Recruitment occurred at the orthopedic units at 4 hospitals in Belgium. Data were collected before surgery (T0), at 3 (T1) and 6 weeks (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) post surgery. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the predictive effect of pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, psychological flexibility, and pain acceptance on long-term functioning, HRQOL, and pain. The sample comprised 100 adolescents and 61 parents. Pain at T0, T1, and T3 and adolescent pain catastrophizing (T0) predicted health-related quality of life, functioning, and pain at T4 (while pain at T2 predicted HRQOL and pain). Parent pain catastrophizing predicted pain at T4. Adolescent and parental psychological flexibility predicted HRQOL, and parent psychological flexibility also predicted pain at T4. Adolescent acceptance at T1 predicted pain, and acceptance at T2 predicted HRQOL, at T4. The study identified pain and adolescent pain catastrophizing as risk factors, and adolescent and parental psychological flexibility and adolescent pain acceptance as resilience factors, for long-term recovery in youths undergoing spinal fusion. Postsurgical pain management targeting these factors may therefore promote recovery for these adolescents.

Documenting Race and Gender Biases in Pain Assessment and a Novel Intervention Designed to Reduce Biases

Disparities in pain care are well-documented such that women and people of color have their pain undertreated and underestimated compared to men and White people. One of the contributors of the undertreatment of pain for people of color and women may be the inaccurate assessment of pain. Understanding the pain assessment process is an important step in evaluating the magnitude of and intervening on pain disparities in care. In the current work, we focus on documenting intersectional race and gender biases in pain assessment and present the results of a novel intervention for reducing these biases. Across 3 studies (N = 532) and a mini meta-analysis using real videotaped people in pain as stimuli, we demonstrate that observers disproportionately underestimated women of color’s pain compared to all other groups (men of color, White women, and White men). In study 3 (N = 232), we show that a novel intervention focused on behavioral skill building (ie, practice and immediate feedback) significantly reduced observers’ pain assessment biases toward marginalized groups compared to all other types of trainings (raising awareness of societal biases, raising awareness of self-biases, and a control condition). While it is an open question as to how long this type of intervention lasts, behavioral skills building around assessing marginalized people’s pain more accurately is a promising training tool for health care professionals. PerspectiveThis article demonstrates the underestimation of pain among people of color and women. We also found support that a novel intervention reduced observers’ pain assessment biases toward marginalized groups. This could be used in medical education or clinical care to reduce intersectional pain care disparities.

Exploring the relationship between language, postoperative pain, and opioid use

Racial and ethnic disparities in pain management are well documented. Differences in pain assessment and management by language have not been studied in the postoperative setting in gynecologic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the association between language and immediate postoperative pain management by comparing pain assessments and perioperative opioid use in non-English speakers and English speakers. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative outcomes between non-English-speaking patients and English-speaking patients who had undergone a gynecologic oncology open surgery between July 2012 and December 2020. The primary language was extracted from the electronic medical record. Opioid use is expressed in oral morphine equivalents. Proportions are compared using chi-square tests, and mean values are compared using 2-sample t tests. Although interpreter services are widely available in our institution, the use of interpreters for any given inpatient-provider interaction is not documented. Between 2012 and 2020, 1203 gynecologic oncology patients underwent open surgery, of whom 181 (15.1%) were non-English speakers and 1018 (84.9%) were English speakers. There was no difference between the 2 cohorts concerning body mass index, surgical risk score, or preoperative opioid use. Compared with the English-speaking group, the non-English-speaking group was younger (57 vs 54 years old, respectively; P<.01) and had lower rates of depression (26% vs 14%, respectively; P<.01) and chronic pain (13% vs 6%, respectively; P<.01). Although non-English-speaking patients had higher rates of hysterectomy than English-speaking patients (80% vs 72%, respectively; P=.03), there was no difference in the rates of bowel resections, adnexal surgeries, lengths of surgery, intraoperative oral morphine equivalents administered, blood loss, use of opioid-sparing modalities, lengths of hospital stay, or intensive care unit admissions. In the postoperative period, compared with English-speaking patients, non-English-speaking patients received fewer oral morphine equivalents per day (31.7 vs 43.9 oral morphine equivalents, respectively; P<.01) and had their pain assessed less frequently (7.7 vs 8.8 checks per day, respectively; P<.01) postoperatively. English-speaking patients received a median of 19.5 more units of oral morphine equivalents daily in the hospital and 205.1 more units of oral morphine equivalents at the time of discharge (P=.02 and P=.04, respectively) than non-English-speaking patients. When controlling for differences between groups and several factors that may influence oral morphine equivalent use, English-speaking patients received a median of 15.9 more units of oral morphine equivalents daily in the hospital cohort and similar oral morphine equivalents at the time of discharge compared with non-English-speaking patients. Patients who do not speak English may be at risk of undertreated pain in the immediate postoperative setting. Language barrier, frequency of pain assessments, and provider bias may perpetuate disparity in pain management. Based on this study's findings, we advocate for the use of regular verbal pain assessments with language-concordant staff or medical interpreters for all postoperative patients.

The Associations Between Opioid Use Disorder and Healthcare-Related Outcomes in Vaso-occlusive Crisis.

In patients who experience frequent vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), opioid dependence may be due to a need for pain control as opposed to addiction; the implications of opioid use disorder (OUD) in this population are unclear. To compare outcomes in hospitalizations for VOC in those with a history of OUD to those without a history of OUD. A retrospective assessment of hospitalizations for adults in the USA with a primary discharge diagnosis of VOC using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019. We also compared VOC hospitalizations to hospitalizations for all other reasons to assess differences in OUD-associated clinical factors. In total, 273,460 hospitalizations for VOC; 23,120 (8.5%) of these hospital stays involved a secondary diagnosis of OUD. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and cost. Mortality was a secondary outcome. Hospital length of stay was increased (mean 6.2 vs 4.9days) in patients with OUD (adjusted rate ratio = 1.24, 95% CI 1.20-1.29, p < 0.001). Mean cost was also higher in those with OUD ($9076) than those without OUD ($8020, p < 0.001). Mortality was decreased in VOC hospitalizations in those with OUD, but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.028-1.48, p = 0.30). OUD is associated with increased length of stay and costs in patients with VOC. While there are many possible explanations, providers should consider undertreatment of pain due to addiction concerns as a potential factor; individualized pain plans to mitigate this challenge could be explored.

Racial Bias in Pain Measurement Frequency in ICU and its Impact on Early Readmission

A significant portion of hospitalizations result in readmissions, many of which are preventable. Additionally, over a quarter of admissions necessitate intensive care unit (ICU) stays. These trends impose significant strain on healthcare systems, leading to penalties and reduced reimbursements for healthcare facilities. Consequently, reducing readmissions stands as a critical priority for healthcare institutions, with a specific focus on ICU processes and procedures. While some healthcare processes, such as vital sign monitoring, are consistent across patient cohorts, disparities in pain management have been well-documented. Existing research predominantly explores biases in outpatient settings, particularly in the underestimation and undertreatment of pain for Black patients. However, these biases can extend to the frequency of pain measurements in ICUs, where continuous monitoring plays a pivotal role in patient care. This study investigates disparities in pain measurement frequencies in ICUs for patients of different races and their impact on early readmission rates. Utilizing a dataset of ICU stays from a major U.S. healthcare institution, we employ mediation analysis with instrumental variables by performing a two-step mediation analysis using an IV-Probit estimator to answer these research questions. Our findings reveal that the frequency of pain measurements in the ICU stays partially mediates the relationship between a patient's race and the probability of early readmission. Specifically, Black patients receive fewer pain measurements during their ICU stays compared to White patients, increasing their likelihood of 30-day readmission. This study represents the first to demonstrate that bias in pain management extends to the frequency of pain measurements in intensive care settings, shedding light on a critical aspect of healthcare disparities and their impact on readmission rates. The implications of our findings span healthcare practice, operations, and the growing body of literature on healthcare equity, offering valuable insights into addressing these disparities.

Measures to Improve Nurses' Pain Management

Pain is the most common medical issue that older people face in a long-term care facility. Registered nurses have a critical role in helping residents manage their pain. This research looked at measures to improve pain management practices in long-term care facilities in Ontario. The site for this research was a chosen long-term care facility in Ontario, Canada, a 160-bed nursing home for the elderly that provides various nursing and medical care services. Semi-structured focus group interviews lasting about an hour were done. This study's population consisted of 45 nurses. The researcher chose a sample of 25 registered nurses using a purposive sampling strategy. The data was reviewed using qualitative data analysis to detect recurring concerns. This research revealed the necessity of identifying measures to improve pain management and reinforcing good practices in long-term care homes; better pain management practices are necessary to manage pain in a long-term care home. This study demonstrated the importance of recognizing and overcoming measures to improve pain management and reinforce good practices in long-term care homes. Therefore, improved measures to improve pain management practices are required to manage pain in a long-term care home effectively. Education about safe pain management will help to prevent the undertreatment of pain and its negative consequences. The overall benefits of measures to improve pain management practices in long-term care homes expand nurses' clinical knowledge in the care of residents living in nursing homes.

Preventing and Treating Pain and Anxiety during Needle-Based Procedures in Children with Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Introduction: Children with cancer experience significant pain and anxiety during needle-based procedures. Undertreated pain in children has long-lasting consequences and reduces the efficacy of subsequent analgesic efforts. A validated quality improvement (QI) intervention, known as the "Children's Comfort Promise", includes (1) topical anesthetics, (2) sucrose or breastfeeding for infants, (3) comfort positioning, and (4) distraction techniques, and has been shown to be highly effective in decreasing procedural pain and anxiety in children. However, there is limited data about the adoption, adaptation, and implementation of these interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: A QI pilot project utilizing the Model for Improvement of the "Global Comfort Promise" was implemented in four global pediatric cancer hospitals (Lima, Peru; Barretos, Brazil; Pietermaritzburg, South Africa; and Manila, Philippines). Between August 2021 and January 2023, the pilot sites identified a specific aim, co-designed the measurement strategy with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and adopted, adapted, and implemented the project at their individual sites. Results: A total of 2,185 different procedures were recorded in the first year of implementation. Most patients were less than 10 years old (60.5%) and solid tumors (37.9%) were the most common diagnosis. Overall, healthcare professionals (98.3%) were satisfied with the procedures. Parents and patients reported that only 33.7% of patients experienced pain during the procedure. All (100%) parents and patients felt the healthcare teams adequately addressed their child's pain. Median self-reported adherence to ≥2 interventions was 98.0%. Challenges to the implementation of the QI initiative included lack of training, turnover of the medical staff, maintaining staff enthusiasm, and access to topical anesthetics. Each site had unique change ideas to implement the initiative. Conclusions: This multi-site, multi-country QI initiative was feasible and was successfully adopted, adapted, and implemented in the LMIC context to improve procedural pain in children (Global Comfort Promise). Additionally, this intervention resulted in high satisfaction of both healthcare professionals and patients/families. Further work is needed to overcome the challenges of topical anesthetic access and education of the workforce. Additional plans include modifying the Global Comfort Promise to include high-quality communication and expanding to additional sites with further refinement of the implementation strategy.

Trends in pain undertreatment among lung cancer patients at the EOL: Analysis of urban city medical insurance data in China.

Cancer-related pain is one of the common priority symptoms in advanced lung cancer patients at the end-of-life (EOL). Alleviating pain is undoubtedly a critical component of palliative care in lung cancer. Our study was initiated to examined trends in opioid prescription-level outcomes as potential indicators of undertreated pain in China. This study used data on 1330 patients diagnosed with lung cancer of urban city medical insurance in China who died between 2014 and 2017. Opioid prescription-level outcomes were determined by annual trends of the proportion of patients filling an opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents, and morphine milligram equivalents per day (MMED) at the EOL (defined as the 60 days before death). We further analyzed monthly changes in the number of opioid prescriptions filled, MMED, and mean daily dose of opioids per prescription (MDDP) of the last 60 days of life by year at death and age, respectively. A total of 959 patients with exact dates of death were included, with 432 cases (45.06%; 95% CI: 44.36%-45.77%) receiving at least one opioid prescription at the EOL. The declining trends were shown in the proportion of patients filling any opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents and MMED, with an annual decrease of 0.341% (p = 0.01), 104.23 mg (p = 0.011) and 2.84 mg (p = 0.014), respectively. Within the 31-60 days to the 0-30 days of life, the MMED declined 6.08 mg (95% CI: -7.14 to -5.03; p = 0.000351), while the number of opioid prescriptions rose 0.66 (95% CI: 0.160-1.16; p = 0.025). Like the MMED, the MDDP fell 4.11 mg (95% CI: -5.86 to -2.37; p = 0.005) within the last month before death compared to the previous month. Terminal lung cancer populations in urban China have experienced reduced access to opioids at the EOL. The clinicians did not prescribe a satisfactory dose of opioids per prescription, while the patients suffered increasing pain in the last 30 days of life. Sufficient opioid analgesic administration should be advocated for lung cancer patients during the EOL period.

Perioperative Opioid-Related Harms: Opportunities to Minimize Risk.

Although substantial attention has been given to opioid prescribing in the United States, opioid-related mortality continues to climb due to the rising incidence and prevalence of opioid use disorder. Perioperative care has an important role in the consideration of opioid prescribing and the care of individuals at risk for poor postoperative pain- and opioid-related outcomes. Opioids are effective for acute pain management and commonly prescribed for postoperative pain. However, failure to align prescribing with patient need can result in overprescribing and exacerbate the flow of unused opioids into communities. Conversely, underprescribing can result in the undertreatment of pain, complicating recovery and impairing well-being after surgery. Optimizing pain management can be particularly challenging for individuals who are previously exposed to opioids or have critical risk factors, including opioid use disorder. In this review, we will explore the role of perioperative care in the broader context of the opioid epidemic in the United States, and provide considerations for a multidisciplinary, comprehensive approach to perioperative pain management and optimal opioid stewardship.

A secondary analysis: the impact of pre-existing chronic pain among patients with cancer presenting to the emergency department with acute pain.

Patients with cancer may experience pain from cancer itself or its treatment. Additionally, chronic pain (CP) predating a patient's cancer diagnosis may make the etiology of pain less clear and the management of pain more complex. In this brief report, we investigated differences in biopsychosocial characteristics, pain severity, and opioid consumption, comparing groups of cancer patients with and without a history of CP who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a complaint of cancer-related pain. This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study included patients with cancer who presented to the ED with a complaint of pain (≥ 4/10). Sociodemographic, clinical, psychological, and pain characteristics were assessed in the ED and subsequent hospitalization. Mann-Whitney U-, T-, and Chi-square tests were used to compare differences between patients with and without pre-existing CP before cancer. Patients with pre-existing CP had lower income (p = 0.21) and less formal education (p = 0.25) and were more likely to have a diagnosis of depression or substance use disorder (p < 0.01). Patients with pre-existing CP reported significantly greater pain severity in the ED and during hospitalization compared to those without pre-existing CP (p < 0.05), despite receiving greater amounts of opioid analgesics (p = 0.036). Identifying a history of pre-existing CP during intake may help identify patients with cancer with difficult to manage pain, who may particularly benefit from multimodal interventions and supportive care. In addition, referral of these patients for themanagement of co-occurring pain disorders may help decrease the usage of the ED for undertreated pain.