Understanding Of Problem-based Learning Research Articles

University Pre-Professional Program: A Transitional Phase from Didactic to PBL Pedagogy.

The College of Science and Health Professions offers the University Pre-Professional Program (UPPP) to newly enrolled students. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in preparing students to become self-directed learners and to seek students' perceptions about student-centered teaching. A quantitative quasi-experimental study that used a pre and post-test survey in two stages, before and after semester-4. A self-developed questionnaire was distributed online. The t-test showed students (n=701) after semester-4 had a significant increase in the understanding of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) (t (699) = -8.27, p < 0.01), PBL dynamics (t (699) = -5.12, p < 0.01), learning and dynamics of Case-Based Learning (CBL) and Self-Directed Learning (SDL) (t (699) = -6.48, p < 0.01), and facilitators' role in such curriculum (t (699) = -3.41, p < 0.01). The ANOVA showed students attending various courses perceived the program variables differently (Learning in PBL p = 0.08, PBL dynamics p < 0.01, CBL and SDL dynamics p < 0.01, role of facilitator in PBL p < 0.01). Regarding the resources used by students during the basic medical sciences courses, no significant difference was observed between the study groups (p = 0.06). However, the only significant difference observed was in their satisfaction with the question related to assessment and course (p < 0.01). The UPPP improved students' understanding of student-centered teaching and learning approaches, especially the PBL. Thus, UPPP helps students shift their learning habits from didactic to student-centered modern learning approaches. Variation among different students' groups could be attributed to their previous academic background and change in learning medium to English. This study suggests that preparatory teaching programs like UPPP are helpful for students interested in joining the bachelor's programs in countries like Saudi Arabia where English is not a native language.

Facilitators’ perspectives of the factors that affect the effectiveness of problem-based learning process

Many educational researchers have established problem-based learning (PBL) as a total approach to education – both a product and a process – from a pedagogical instructional strategy to skills development to assessment. This study provides qualitative evidences from educational practitioners in various professional disciplines, namely, Medicine, Engineering, Dentistry, and Science in Ireland and Hong Kong, on some of the identifiable issues that affect the effectiveness of the PBL process: the actual problem, the assessment, the students’ pre-college learning culture and the facilitator’s role. Given the increasing level of faculty interest in PBL in higher education, it is evident that training and guidelines must be provided. Moreover, clear understanding of PBL and communications between curriculum developers and PBL facilitators are vitally important for ensuring effectiveness of PBL implementation. Findings also suggest that the pre-college learning culture is least influential on PBL effectiveness, provided that students are given numerous opportunities to work collaboratively from the start of their university studies.

Problem-based learning (PBL) and speech-language pathology: A tutorial

The aim of this tutorial is to provide an introduction to problem-based learning (PBL), particularly as applied to speech-language pathology (SLP) programs. The tutorial is aimed at the reader who is less familiar with this learning approach. Additionally, it serves as a framework for the articles that follow in this special issue on PBL programs in SLP and other clinical education programs. A brief history of PBL is provided and the rationale and context for this approach are identified. PBL is defined and differentiated from related educational approaches. Different models and variations of PBL are outlined. The key components of PBL are further illustrated using the tutorial cycle. Finally, we present one specific case of a PBL-based SLP program in detail. This tutorial will provide a deeper understanding of PBL for many higher educators in SLP. The strengths of this approach are outlined and the challenges are identified, particularly for those contemplating converting an existing “traditional” course or curriculum.

Nursing students’ views on the effectiveness of problem-based learning

A descriptive study was conducted with 28 nursing students in Macao and 23 nursing students in Shanghai to explore students' views on the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL). The PBL Evaluation Questionnaire was used. It used a 20-item self-report Likert scale with a 5-point response choice (1=ineffective and 5=very effective). The value of the content validity index tested by five experts was determined as one and the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.90. The test-retest reliability with a two-week internal check was 0.89. Two open-ended questions were asked to determine students' comments on the positive and negative features of PBL. The response rate was 100%. Overall, students considered PBL to be moderately effective with a mean of 3.58 (S.D.=0.52). Students from Macao considered PBL to be less effective than students from Shanghai. However, half of the Macao students and 21.74% of the Shanghai students indicated that PBL was a time-consuming and stressful process that involved an increased workload. A small number of students indicated that sometimes the information they received was vague and this resulted in a lack of student confidence. It is clear that the initial implementation of PBL is not always a smooth process. Tutors should be prepared to provide students with substantial support in developing their understanding of PBL, and help students develop appropriate strategies for coping and engaging in the PBL learning process.

Reflecting on the Essence of our Problem-Based Learning Discussions: The Importance of Faculty Development and our Continuous Quest for Applications of Problem-Based Learning

While problem-based learning (PBL) is a teaching strategy to promote critical thinking, creativity and self-directedness in learning is very important. It is the meaning of the learning, with a contextual understanding, that marks the significance of this approach in our healthcare education. At the 2008 Kaohsiung Medical University International Conference and Workshop on PBL, the scholarly discourse on sharing empirical findings and practical experience with various aspects of PBL brought forth the importance of the teachers' continued learning about the meaning, the dynamics of the process, and the pragmatic details of PBL. This quest for a continuous learning and understanding about PBL parallels our search to extend the classroom PBL into students' clinical experience. The development of clinical teachers in the understanding of PBL was explored as part of their experiential learning in clinical teaching after their PBL workshops. While the clinical teachers who participated in the project appreciated the merits of clinical PBL, the complex balance between patient service and student teaching--in an unpredictable clinical setting--has led to the use of a simulated clinical environment with simulated patients. We also piloted PBL for interprofessional education of undergraduate students of nursing and social work. The ways we can adopt PBL in various settings with different intents will help prepare our healthcare graduates in meeting the challenges of our ever more complex healthcare systems, and the demands of holistic patient care.

Introduction: Summarizing Findings and Looking Ahead to a New Generation of PBL Research

The articles in this issue eff ectively summarize three decades of Problem Based Learning (PBL) research. The meta-analysis (Walker & Leary) and meta-synthesis (Strobel & van Barneveld) articles review outcomes of studies conducted from 1976 to 2007 that compared a PBL curriculum to a traditional curriculum. The third article off ers a critique of assessments used in these studies. This commentary highlights the conclusions of the articles and their unique contributions to our understanding of PBL and the breadth of its impact. Issues to be addressed in future research are discussed.

Problem‐based learning: a viable approach in leadership development?

PurposeThe aim of the paper is to investigate problem‐based learning (PBL) as a viable approach in leadership development. It identifies several key factors, strategies and possible outcomes associated with this new approach to training.Design/methodology/approachReflective inquiry through storytelling was employed as a research tool to gather rich qualitative data from two PBL trainers and 18 senior management personnel in a Singapore engineering firm. In‐depth interviewing was conducted four months after a structured three‐day leadership training using PBL.FindingsThrough a content analysis, three important factors have been identified as contributing to the meaningfulness of leaders' learning process: problem definition; open communication; and utilization of resources. Also, appropriate handholding is required to facilitate participants' deeper understanding of PBL even after the training session.Research limitations/implicationsThe study has led to new theoretical perspectives of cognitive and behavioral learning. For instance, PBL has increased participants' capacity and propensity to learn through the interplay of adaptive and generative learning. Further, the dynamics of learning hinge on the notion of single‐ and double‐loop learning where acting (investigation), thinking (reflection) and learning (knowledge sharing) intersect.Practical implicationsA matrix eliciting a guided approach to PBL in leadership development is presented to make explicit the subtle complexity of the learning process. Through both a structured training to an unstructured operational phase, PBL has led leaders to the discovery of new roles, attitudes and knowledge required to meet current changing times.Originality/valuePBL is traditionally an educational tool, but its wider application manifested in leadership training offers an original perspective in human resource development. Of value is the attempt to quantity qualitative data, yielding considerable clarity in the way complex information is managed.

Staff comfort/discomfort with problem-based learning. A preliminary study

Crucial to the implementation and success of any educational program, especially problem-based learning (PBL), is the support and co-operation from staff involved in its use. It is suggested that this support and co-operation is dependent on their understanding of and comfort with the process especially when PBL may require substantial change in teaching practices. This paper reports the results of apilot survey of staff responses to several aspects of the PBL approach of which the authors became aware. The survey focuses on issues of comfort with the process, knowledge and understanding of PBL, and preparation for the teaching role in PBL. As a preliminary study, it provides some indicators of staff responses to PBL implementation as well as highlighting sources of comfort/discomfort with the process.