Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis In Children Research Articles

Modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy vs. laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.

Modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (mERAT) has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of appendicitis. However, data from children in large samples are lacking. The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy between mERAT and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. We retrospectively analyzed 594 patients with suspected uncomplicated appendicitis from October 2018 to May 2021. A pool of 294 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were ultimately enrolled in this study (228 and 66 patients in mERAT and LA, respectively). Given the differences in baseline clinical data (gender, age), the regression equation including differences in clinical baseline, grouping factor, and white blood cell count was established to address the influence of potential confounding factors. The initial success rate of mERAT management was 96.9%, and the recurrence rate was 6.9% in the mERAT group and 1.7% in the LA group within 1 year, which was no significant difference. But the mERAT group had a lower rate of adverse events. Finally, those results indicated that the treatment modalities, LA or mERAT, had no significant effect on initial success rate (P = 0.99) or recurrence rate (P = 0.17) within 1 year, but a significant effect on the adverse events rate during hospitalization (P = 0.01) in the multivariate regression analysis. Among children with uncomplicated appendicitis, an initial mERAT management strategy had a success rate of 96.9%, which was similar to the LA group at 1 year. This follow-up supports the feasibility of mERAT alone as an alternative to surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis.

Outcomes of Conservative Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Children

Background: Pediatric healthcare is evolving, with acute appendicitis being a common issue. Traditionally, appendectomy has been the standard treatment. However, recent literature suggests that conservative antibiotic treatment could be a viable option, particularly for uncomplicated cases in children. Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of conservative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. Methods: From July 2017 to March 2019, a prospective observational study was conducted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, involving 62 children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. They received conservative treatment, including supportive care, for five days. Patients who responded positively within 24 hours continued for at least five days before discharge and underwent a 6-month follow-up. Results: The study encompassed 62 patients, with a mean age of 8.95 years, and a slight male predominance (61.3% male, 38.7% female). Clinical findings revealed a notable decrease in pain intensity (9.42 to 0.77), temperature (101.02º to 98.90º), and inflammatory markers (CRP: 28.13 ± 11.56 mg/L to 9.78 ± 7.50 mg/L) from admission to day 5. The mean duration of hospital stay was 5.26 ± 0.63 days. Remarkably, 95.1% of patients successfully recovered with conservative treatment, while 4.9% required surgery as part of their treatment course. Conclusion: This study found some potential benefits of conservative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. Significant improvements in clinical parameters and a high success rate emphasize its potential as a viable alternative to surgery in select cases, warranting further exploration in pediatric healthcare practices.

Assessing micro- vs macro-costing approaches for treating appendicitis in children with appendicectomy or non-operatively

ObjectivesWe conducted a health economic sub-study within a feasibility RCT comparing a non-operative treatment pathway as an alternative to appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. The objectives were to understand and assess data collection tools and methods and to determine indicative costs and benefits assessing the feasibility of conducting a full economic evaluation within the definitive trial.MethodsWe compared different methods of estimating treatment costs including micro-costing, hospital administrative data (PLICS) and health system (NHS) reference costs. We compared two different HRQoL instruments (CHU-9D and EQ-5D-5L) in terms of data completeness and sensitivity to change over time, including potential ceiling effects. We also explored how the timing of data collection and duration of the analysis could affect QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) and the results of the cost-utility analysis (CUA) within the future RCT.ResultsUsing a micro-costing approach, the total per treatment costs were in alignment with hospital administrative data (PLICS). Average health system reference cost data (macro-costing using NHS costs) could potentially underestimate these treatment costs, particularly for non-operative treatment. Costs incurred following hospital discharge in the primary care setting were minimal, and limited family borne costs were reported by parents/carers. While both HRQoL instruments performed relatively well, our results highlight the problem of ceiling effect and the importance of the timing of data collection and the duration of the analysis in any future assessment using QALYs and CUA.ConclusionsWe highlighted the importance of obtaining accurate individual-patient cost data when conducting economic evaluations. Our results suggest that timing of data collection and duration of the assessment are important considerations when evaluating cost-effectiveness and reporting cost per QALY.Clinical trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN15830435.

Covid-19 Pandemic Strategy for Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis with Antibiotics- Risk Categorization and Shared Decision-Making

BackgroundDuring the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a protocol was adopted by our department on antibiotics treatment for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis (AUA). Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of non-operative treatment (NOT), compared to upfront laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), for AUA in children during the pandemic. MethodOur prospective comparative study was conducted from May 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021. Patient selection criteria included: age ≥5 years, abdominal pain duration ≤48 h, ultrasound (US)/Computered Tomography scan confirmation of AUA, US appendiceal diameter 6–11 mm with no features of perforation/abscess collection and no faecolith. For NOT patients, intravenous antibiotics were administered for 24–48 h followed by oral for 10-day course. Comparison was performed between patients whose parents preferred NOT to those who opted for up-front appendectomy. Primary outcomes were NOT success at index admission, early and late NOT failure rates till 27 months. Secondary outcomes were differences in complication rate, hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost between groups. Results77 patients were recruited: 43 (55.8%) underwent NOT while 34 (44.2%) patients opted for LA. Success of NOT at index admission was 90.7% (39/43). Overall, NOT failure rate at 27 months’ follow-up was 37.2% (16/43). Of the NOT failures, 1 appendix was normal on histology while only 1 was perforated. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between both groups except for LOS of late NOT failure. Cost for upfront LA was nearly thrice that of NOT. ConclusionOur stringent COVID protocol together with shared decision-making with parents is a safe and feasible treatment option during a crisis situation. Level of EvidenceTreatment study, Level II.

Discriminatory capacity of serum total bilirubin between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children: a systematic review and a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

This study aimed to examine the ability of serum total bilirubin (STB) to discriminate between complicated and uncomplicated paediatric acute appendicitis (PAA). We conducted a systematic review of the literature that involved an extensive search in the main databases of medical bibliography (Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, OVID, Scopus, Cochrane Library). Two independent reviewers selected the relevant articles based on the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of the selected articles was assessed using the QUADAS2 index. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. A synthesis of the results, a standardization of the metrics and a random-effect meta-analysis were performed. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed in subgroup analysis by study design. In addition, a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis was performed. This review included 8 studies with data from 3634 participants aged between 0 and 18years (2230 with uncomplicated PAA and 1404 with complicated PAA). The random-effects meta-analysis showed significantly higher mean STB in the complicated PAAgroup than in theuncomplicated PAAgroup (difference = 0.27; 95%CI 0.06-0.48) and high heterogeneity (I2 = 96%). In subgroup analyses by study design, the difference remained significant in prospective studies. The DTA meta-analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.83 (95%CI 0.79-0.86) and pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68.53% (95%CI 48.35%-83.51%) and 81.12% (95%CI 67.76%-89.78%), respectively. Mean values of STB are higher in children with complicated than uncomplicated acute appendicitis, and the diagnostic yield of STB seems to be high. Due to the high heterogeneity between studies, these results must be interpreted with caution.

＜Editors' Choice＞ Advantages of gasless single-port transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children in China: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Gasless transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy is an approach used increasingly to treat uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UAA). However, there is limited information on its clinical effects and value in the Chinese pediatric population. This study retrospectively reviewed patients with UAA treated in two pediatric institutions from January 2018 through October 2021. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups by operative technique: gasless transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (gasless-TULAA, n=142) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA, three-port, n=126). The perioperative clinical data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operation time, time to postoperative ambulation, time to first postoperative exhaust, hospitalization expenses, and postoperative complications (incision infection, intestinal obstruction, and residual abdominal abscess), were compared between the two groups. Operations in both groups were successfully conducted without converting to open surgery. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in age and BMI in the two groups. Compared with CLA, gasless-TULAA showed significantly shorter operation time, earlier postoperative ambulation, shorter postoperative exhaust time, and lower hospital cost (p < 0.001). All patients were followed for 3 months, and postoperative complications were observed in three patients: two patients in the gasless-TULAA group (one with surgical wound effusion, one with intra-abdominal abscess), and one patient in the CLA group (surgical wound infection); there was no significant difference between the groups. Notably, 38 patients initially treated by gasless-TULAA were converted because of intraoperative factors. The gasless-TULAA technique had potential benefits: shortened operation time, better outcome, and greater cost-efficiency. These superiorities are worthy of future large-scale prospective study.

Discriminatory capacity of serum interleukin-6 between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children: a prospective validation study

BackgroundSerum interleukin-6 (IL-6) has a moderate diagnostic performance in pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA). The evidence regarding its capacity to discern between complicated and uncomplicated PAA is scarce.MethodsWe designed a prospective observational study to validate serum IL-6 as a marker for diagnostic classification between complicated and uncomplicated PAA. This study included 205 patients divided into three groups: (1) patients who underwent major outpatient surgery (n = 57); (2) patients with non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP) in whom the diagnosis of PAA was excluded (n = 53), and (3) patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAA (n = 95). The PAA patients were further classified as uncomplicated or complicated PAA. IL-6 concentration was determined in all patients at diagnosis. Comparative statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the Fisher exact test and the Kruskall Wallis test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated.ResultsMedian (interquartile range, IQR) serum IL-6 values were 2 pg/mL (2.0–3.4) in group 1, 3.9 pg/mL (2.4–11.9) in group 2, and 23.9 pg/mL (11.1–61.0) in group 3 (P < 0.001). Among the participants in group 3, those with uncomplicated PAA had median (IQR) serum IL-6 values of 17.2 pg/mL (8.5–36.8), and those with complicated PAA had 60.25 pg/mL (27.1–169) serum IL-6 (P < 0.001). At the cut-off point of 19.55 pg/mL, the AUC for the discrimination between patients in group 2 vs. 3 was 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–0.90], with a sensitivity of 61.3% and a specificity of 86.8. The AUC for the discrimination between patients with uncomplicated and complicated PAA was 0.77 (95% CI 0.68–0.86) and the cut-off point was 25.90 pg/mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 65.6%, respectively.ConclusionsSerum IL-6 has a good performance in discerning between complicated and uncomplicated PAA. A score including clinical and radiological variables may increase the diagnostic performance of this molecule.

Non-Operative Management of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children

Objective: To compare the efficacy of non-surgical conservative management with surgical management in cases of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.&#x0D; Study design: Prospective comparative study.&#x0D; Settings: Pediatric surgery Department, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College Sukkur.&#x0D; Study duration: 1st February 2020 to 31st May 2021.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: Ninety patients of either gender with age range from 5-12 years, diagnosed as uncomplicated acute appendicitis, were divided in two groups. Group C patients were managed conservatively with antibiotics (ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg/day, amikacin 10mg/kg/day and metronidazole 22.5 mg/kg/day) and maintenance fluids were started. Patients were observed for improvement or any signs of deterioration. Those who deteriorated within 24 hours were managed with surgical management immediately. Follow-ups were carried out after discharge on the 7th day, 1 month, and six months. Patients reporting a recurrence of symptoms were managed with appendicectomy. Group S patients were managed with appendicectomy with the open technique. Patients were observed for post-operative complications.&#x0D; Results: Demographic data of both groups was comparable. In group C, 34 (75.56%) patients were successfully treated with conservative management, whereas in group S, 39 (86.67%) were successfully treated with surgical management. The difference was insignificant with a p-value of 0.114. In group C, 5 (11.11%) patients did not respond to conservative management and they were managed with appendicectomy and recurrence of symptoms was seen in 6 (13.33%) patients in group C, they were also managed with appendicectomy. In group S, 6 (13.33%) patients suffered post-operative complications. Mean length of stay in hospital was 4.31±1.20 and 4.09±1.12 days in group C and S respectively. This difference was statistically insignificant with a p-value of 0.368.&#x0D; Conclusion: It is concluded in our study that uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children can be successfully managed with non-surgical conservative management.

New Criteria Could Improve the Success Rate of Non-operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Children.

Background: Most studies addressing non-operative management for acute appendicitis have focused on adults, and there are limited data available for children. We aimed to evaluate the results of successful non-operative management in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis with our “additional criteria” and find which factors could be affecting the success rate and which cases could be candidates for non-operative management.Materials and methods: A total of 54 patients who were diagnosed with acute uncomplicated appendicitis and received non-operative management were re-evaluated retrospectively. Defining uncomplicated appendicitis was based on the duration of symptoms (<24 hours), clinical history, and radiologic findings. The radiologic evaluation was based on ultrasonography and computed tomography. The patients received an intravenous antibiotic combination (sulbactam/ampicillin, gentamicin, clindamycin) for five days at the hospital; the treatment was completed after 10 days with an oral antibiotic combination (amoxicillin/clavulanate, metronidazole). The cases have a follow-up period of up to two years.Results: The mean patient age and follow-up time were 13.0 ± 4 years and 41.6 ± 13 months, respectively. The mean leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and appendix diameter values were 15.48 ± 6.4 × 109/L, 11.79 ± 24.5 mg/dL, and 7.76 ± 1.4 mm on admission, and 6.86 ± 12.4 × 109/L, 4.17 ± 10.3 mg/dL, and 5.82 ± 1.6 mm on the second day, respectively. This decrease in WBC/CRP values and appendix diameter was statistically significant (p < 0.001). None of the patients had an early failure, complication, or adverse event. Recurrent appendicitis occurred in only five cases (9%) that were treated by laparoscopic appendectomy during the follow-up.Conclusion: Non-operative management for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children regarding long-term outcomes with our criteria was satisfactory and initial success rates were excellent.

Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT.

Although non-operative treatment is known to be effective for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children, randomised trial data comparing important outcomes of non-operative treatment with those of appendicectomy are lacking. The objectives were to ascertain the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway with appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. This was a mixed-methods study, which included a feasibility randomised controlled trial, embedded and parallel qualitative and survey studies, a parallel health economic feasibility study and the development of a core outcome set. This study was set in three specialist NHS paediatric surgical units in England. Children (aged 4-15 years) clinically diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis participated in the feasibility randomised controlled trial. Children, their families, recruiting clinicians and other health-care professionals involved in caring for children with appendicitis took part in the qualitative study. UK specialist paediatric surgeons took part in the survey. Specialist paediatric surgeons, adult general surgeons who treat children, and children and young people who previously had appendicitis, along with their families, took part in the development of the core outcome set. Participants in the feasibility randomised controlled trial were randomised to a non-operative treatment pathway (broad-spectrum antibiotics and active observation) or appendicectomy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible patients recruited to the feasibility trial. Data were sourced from NHS case notes, questionnaire responses, transcribed audio-recordings of recruitment discussions and qualitative interviews. Overall, 50% (95% confidence interval 40% to 59%) of 115 eligible patients approached about the trial agreed to participate and were randomised. There was high acceptance of randomisation and good adherence to trial procedures and follow-up (follow-up rates of 89%, 85% and 85% at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, respectively). More participants had perforated appendicitis than had been anticipated. Qualitative work enabled us to communicate about the trial effectively with patients and families, to design and deliver bespoke training to optimise recruitment and to understand how to optimise the design and delivery of a future trial. The health economic study indicated that the main cost drivers are the ward stay cost and the cost of the operation; it has also informed quality-of-life assessment methods for future work. A core outcome set for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people was developed, containing 14 outcomes. There is adequate surgeon interest to justify proceeding to an effectiveness trial, with 51% of those surveyed expressing a willingness to recruit with an unchanged trial protocol. Because the feasibility randomised controlled trial was performed in only three centres, successful recruitment across a larger number of sites cannot be guaranteed. However, the qualitative work has informed a bespoke training package to facilitate this. Although survey results suggest adequate clinician interest to make a larger trial possible, actual participation may differ, and equipoise may have changed over time. A future effectiveness trial is feasible, following limited additional preparation, to establish appropriate outcome measures and case identification. It is recommended to include a limited package of qualitative work to optimise recruitment, in particular at new centres. Prior to proceeding to an effectiveness trial, there is a need to develop a robust method for distinguishing children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from those with more advanced appendicitis, and to reach agreement on a primary outcome measure and effect size that is acceptable to all stakeholder groups involved. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15830435. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

CONservative TReatment of Appendicitis in Children: a randomised controlled feasibility Trial (CONTRACT)

ObjectiveTo establish the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared with appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.DesignFeasibility...

The modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus antibiotic therapy alone for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children.

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is an emerging endoscopic treatment modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) supported by several case series. However, to date, systematic studies have not been conducted in children and the prospective comparative data are lacking. Moreover, due to a concern for future malignancy risk in children from ionizing radiation, we used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) instead of endoscopic retrograde appendiceal radiography (ERAR). Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized control clinical trial to compare the modified ERAT (mERAT) to antibiotic therapy in children with AUA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility and of mERAT in the treatment of hospitalized children with AUA. Children with AUA, confirmed by ultrasonography and or abdominal computed tomography, were consecutively enrolled from October 2018 to February, 2020. They were randomly assigned to receive mERAT or routine antibiotic treatment. Patients were followed until May, 2020. Th primary outcome variable was the duration of relief of the abdominal pain after treatment. We collected patient's demographics, ultrasonic imaging findings, colonoscopy findings, and treatment outcomes of the mERAT and adverse even associated with mERAT. A total of 83 children were enrolled. 36 were randomized to mERAT and 47 to antibiotics treatment. All children in the mERAT group had endoscopic confirmed acute uncomplicated appendicitis, and there were no significant complications. However, 9 of patients in antibiotic group were poor responsive to treatment and switched to mERAT. The overall success rate of treatment with mERAT (100%) was significantly higher than that of antibiotics (80.9%) (P = 0.004). The median time to discharge was significantly shorter in mERAT group than in antibiotics treatment group [6.0 ± 1.76days] (P = 0.004). mERAT provide a new alternative therapeutic option for childhood with AUA, especially for families who are reluctant to undergo an appendectomy.

Spontaneous recovery from uncomplicated acute appendicitis

Background: Historically, acute appendicitis requires surgical treatment. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in treating uncomplicated cases in a conservative way. The development in radiological and laboratory diagnosis has allowed for better possibilities of identification and watchful waiting of simple appendicitis. Objectives: The aim of the study was a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of conservative treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children diagnosed based on clinical, laboratory and sonographic signs. Materials and methods: The diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitis was based on the clinical signs, laboratory tests and ultrasound findings. Two clinical criteria, one laboratory criterion and two sonographic criteria, were assumed as a clear diagnosis of appendicitis. the retrospective assessment was conducted among 382 children who were hospitalised for suspected appendicitis. In those we identified a group of 66 children who met the criteria of acute appendicitis. The efficacy of conservative treatment in patients who met the criteria mentioned above was evaluated. Results: Within the period of at least one year, 89.4% of patients (59/66) were not re-hospitalised for recurrent symptoms. Eventually, 92.4% of patients (61/66) included in the study did not require surgical treatment. Conclusion: Uncomplicated acute appendicitis should be initially treated conservatively with watchful waiting. The vast majority of uncomplicated appendicitis cases can resolve spontaneously.

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children: Case series

IntroductionSingle-port laparoscopy has been used in any areas of surgery, including appendectomy, to reduce the operative stress and enhance postoperative recovery procedure. This paper introduces our attempt to perform single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional laparoscoopic instruments and a needle-type grasping forceps (SLAN), which has dominant advantage in cosmetic appearance. MethodsWe report six pediatric patients who underwent SLAN for uncomplicated appendicitis from April to November 2019. SLAN was performed transumbilically, while conventional laparoscopic instruments and needle-type grasping forceps were both used. After routine intracorporeal appendectomy was completed, the pathological appendix was extracted through the single-port site, while a 10 mm trocar was used to avoid incision infectious. Clinical data and postoperative follow-up data were collected and analyzed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of this novel technique. ResultsSLAN was successfully performed in all six pediatric patients. The median operative time, first exhaust time after surgery, pain score of postoperative day 1, and postoperative hospital stay were 69 (range, 50−85) min, 1.33 (range, 1–2) d, 0.83 (range, 0–3) score, 1.5 (range, 1–2) d, respectively. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were noted, while no incision infectious, adhesive intestinal obstruction, and abdominal abscess were observed with 2–9 months follow up. DiscussionThough there are many methods to perform single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, the use of needle grasping forceps in laparoscopic appendectomy has been confirmed a new choice for uncomplicated appendicitis in children. ConclusionSLAN is a feasible and safe technique to treat acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children. To be emphasized, surgeons must strictly grasp the indications for this surgery.

The contemporary appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children

BackgroundNational, procedure-specific clinical registries are increasingly available in surgery, although data about children have lagged behind. Data related to the surgical management of appendicitis in children have become available recently and can be used to inform patient and family expectations and to identify clinical areas in need of ongoing improvement. MethodsCases of acute, uncomplicated appendicitis in children (<18 years of age) were extracted from the 2017 pediatric appendectomy-targeted file of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Epidemiologic data were generated across 5 domains: (1) patient characteristics/severity, (2) preoperative imaging patterns, (3) characteristics of the operation, (4) pathologic outcomes, and (5) postoperative morbidity and mortality. ResultsThe final sample included 9,507 appendectomies for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis performed at 106 hospitals. The population was predominantly male (60.6%), involving children 6 to 12 years of age (55.3%). Only 2.9% of patients did not have imaging before their appendectomy. Overall, 38.2% received a computed tomography; however, patients transferred with imaging received computed tomography at 3.8 times the rate of those with only local (ie, operating hospital) imaging. Laparoscopy was used in 94.6% of cases, with 1.1% converted to open. Negative appendectomy and complication rates were 3.3% and 2.1%, respectively. Children ≤5 years of age had 2.3 greater odds of negative appendectomy than children 6 to 17 years of age. ConclusionChildren undergoing operation for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis have excellent clinical outcomes, although children ≤5 years of age have an increased risk of negative appendectomy. Despite guidelines against their use, more than one-third of children received a computed tomography before operation, driven predominantly by transferring hospitals.

Outcomes of extracorporeal, transumbilical versus intracorporeal laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children and adolescents: A retrospective observational cohort study

BackgroundAn extracorporeal (ECA), transumbilical appendectomy has been proposed as a treatment for appendicitis. This study assessed the 30-day perioperative outcomes and cost between ECA and traditional intracorporeal (ICA) techniques for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. MethodsIRB approval was obtained for this retrospective cohort study of acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children aged 4 to 17 between April 2014 and April 2017. Patients were grouped based on ICA versus ECA. Operative time, length of stay, and complication rates were recorded. ResultsA total of 289 patients were included, and of these 217 underwent ICA, and 72 underwent ECA. Median weight-for-age percentile was the only demographic characteristic different between groups (ECA 50 [0.1–100] vs. ICA 71 [0–100]; p < 0.01). Median operative time was significantly shorter in the ECA group (21.0 min [8.0–61.0] vs. 38.0 min [19.0–87.0]; p < 0.0001). Length of stay and complication rates were similar between groups. The median per case cost was significantly lower in the ECA group (CAD$ 593.05 range: 499.70–900.81 vs. CAD$ 858.78 range: 490.36–1106.29; p < 0.001). ConclusionsExtracorporeal transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with shorter operative times and no increased risk of 30-day postoperative complications in children and adolescents. This offers a new operative approach that may reduce hospital cost and resources. Level of evidenceIII.

Management of uncomplicatted accute appendicitis in children

Purpose: To review the existing evidence in 2017-2018 and spreading the information, with solid scientific basis, regarding the use of no operative treatment for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Methods: A literature search for the years 2017/2018 was performed using the following descriptors: uncomplicated acute appendicitis, children, paediatric appendicitis, pediatric appendicitis, management, medical treatment, clinical treatment, antibiotics treatment, no operative treatment and surgical treatment, appendectomy. Randomized controlled trials were considered the best source of information. Results: On the reviewed literature, one can say that the no operative approach for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children presents similar outcome, hospital length of stay, antibiotic days, reduced degree and duration of pain, and overall perioperative complication rates, but there may be more inpatient readmissions and missing other diseases when compared with surgical treatment. However, this new approach reduces negative appendectomy rate, shorter days of sick leave and care leave, expedited return for the child go back to school and other normal activities, decreased hospital charge and less long term complications. Conclusion: Antibiotics treatment alone appears to be a safe first-line therapy in selected children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis and deserves a randomized controlled trial in tertiary hospitals in Brazil. Those patients who require future appendectomy do not experience significant complications. A multicenter Brazilian trial comparing antibiotics-first to appendectomy, including outpatient management, is feasible to evaluate efficacy and safety of this new approach.

CONTRACT Study - CONservative TReatment of Appendicitis in Children (feasibility): study protocol for a randomised controlled Trial

BackgroundCurrently, the routine treatment for acute appendicitis in the United Kingdom is an appendicectomy. However, there is increasing scientific interest and research into non-operative treatment of appendicitis in adults and children. While a number of studies have investigated non-operative treatment of appendicitis in adults, this research cannot be applied to the paediatric population. Ultimately, we aim to perform a UK-based multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost effectiveness of non-operative treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children, as compared with appendicectomy. First, we will undertake a feasibility study to assess the feasibility of performing such a trial.Methods/designThe study involves a feasibility RCT with a nested qualitative research to optimise recruitment as well as a health economic substudy. Children (aged 4–15 years inclusive) diagnosed with acute uncomplicated appendicitis that would normally be treated with an appendicectomy are eligible for the RCT. Exclusion criteria include clinical/radiological suspicion of perforated appendicitis, appendix mass or previous non-operative treatment of appendicitis. Participants will be randomised into one of two arms. Participants in the intervention arm are treated with antibiotics and regular clinical assessment to ensure clinical improvement. Participants in the control arm will receive appendicectomy. Randomisation will be minimised by age, sex, duration of symptoms and centre. Children and families who are approached for the RCT will be invited to participate in the embedded qualitative substudy, which includes recording of recruitment consultants and subsequent interviews with participants and non-participants and their families and recruiters. Analyses of these will inform interventions to optimise recruitment. The main study outcomes include recruitment rate (primary outcome), identification of strategies to optimise recruitment, performance of trial treatment pathways, clinical outcomes and safety of non-operative treatment. We have involved children, young people and parents in study design and delivery.DiscussionIn this study we will explore the feasibility of performing a full efficacy RCT comparing non-operative treatment with appendicectomy in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Factors determining success of the present study include recruitment rate, safety of non-operative treatment and adequate interest in the future RCT. Ultimately this feasibility study will form the foundation of the main RCT and reinforce its design.Trial registrationISRCTN15830435. Registered on 8 February 2017.

Conservative antibiotic treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis is feasible

Appendectomy versus conservative antibiotic treatment (CAT) for children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) remains unresolved, with concerns regarding the practicality of CAT. We analyzed our center's experience with CAT for AUA, using a protocol with strict inclusion, exclusion and treatment criteria. Non-randomized, prospective cohort study included all children admitted betwee 2014 and 2016, with clinical and laboratory tests suspicious for AUA. Data collected included clinical signs and symptoms; laboratory, ultrasound and pathology results. Follow-up was conducted through clinic visits, telephone conversations and national registry analysis. Included in CAT: 362 children, 19 underwent appendectomy within 1-2days. Overall, 75 were readmitted for recurrent acute appendicitis during 22months (6-43) follow-up. Thirty were treated successfully with antibiotics a second time. The remaining 45 had appendectomy. Overall, 86.8% underwent CAT with no surgery. Histology of all recurrent AUA revealed no perforations. We confirm the feasibility of conservative management of AUA in children. A rigorous diagnostic plan with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria will lead to high success rate of CAT with a strong safety profile. CAT does not compete with surgery or render appendectomy unnecessary. It is a safe alternative to surgery in selected cases.

Non-operative Management for Uncomplicated Appendicitis: An Option to Consider.

The main goal of our study was to assess a 7 days long course of antibiotics for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. From March 2014 to November 2015, all patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis have been considered to be treated by only antibiotics. Inclusion criteria included clinical (tenderness), biological (C-reactive protein [CRP] < 50), and radiological features (diameter > 6 mm). All patients were treated with intravenous amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (100 mg/kg/day) for 2 days (six doses). At the end of the treatment, clinical and paraclinical examinations included blood samples at day 7 and ultrasound (US) scan at 3 months. A total of 166 patients were treated and followed up prospectively during the study period. Mean age at diagnosis was 10.8 ± 0.6 years. All children, but four were discharged with a clinical improvement after 48 hours and six intravenous antibiotics injection according to our protocol. Four children required surgery during the initial hospitalization period.Initial ultrasound scan showed a mean diameter of 7.85 ± 1.6 mm, with inflamed fat in 124 patients (74.7%). At Day 7, the diameter was 5.2 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.0001).During a median follow-up of 18.8 months (3.5-18), 22 patients (13.25%) had to be managed for a novel episode of acute appendicitis after a median period of 138 days (13-270). None had to be managed for a complicated appendicitis. Non-operative treatment (NOT) is a safe alternative for the management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. Further study should be conducted to determine relapse risk factors.