Unacceptable Adverse Events Research Articles

An open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-center, tandem two-stage designed phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant in women with recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive gynecological malignancies (FUCHSia study)

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate fulvestrant efficacy in women with estrogen receptor-positive low-grade gynecological cancers. The primary objective was to determine the response rate. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival, clinical...

Abstract RF02-06: AVIATOR/TBCRC045: A randomized phase II study of vinorelbine (N) + trastuzumab (H) alone or combined with avelumab (A) +/- utomilumab (U) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT03414658)

Abstract Background: Chemotherapy (chemo) + H is standard of care therapy for pts with refractory HER2+ MBC. It is unknown whether the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or a 4-1BB agonist (U) improves efficacy of standard chemo + H for this population. Methods: Eligible pts had HER2+ MBC previously treated with H, pertuzumab (P), and T-DM1. Pts previously treated with N or ICI were excluded. 100 pts were randomized 1:2:2 to tx with NH, NHA, or NHAU. ER status and presence of liver metastases were stratification factors. The original co-primary objectives were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) of (1) NHA vs NH; and (2) NHAU vs NHA. In 2021, due to discontinuation of clinical development of U, an unplanned interim futility analysis reviewed by IDMC led to closure of NHAU and randomization of the final 13 pts to NH or NHA. For the comparison of NH vs NHA, with 60 pts randomized (20 vs 40) there was 88% power for a log-rank test to detect improvement in median PFS (mPFS) from 2 to 4 mos with one-sided alpha of 0.1. Corresponding 2-sided 80% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for the stratified Cox model hazard ratios (HR), along with stratified one-sided log-rank p-value. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety/tolerability. Results: 100 pts were randomized from 7/2018-3/2023, and 97 pts started tx on trial: 18 NH, 45 NHA, and 34 NHAU (prior to its closure). Pts were 99% female, with median age 54 yrs (range 26-78 yrs); 70% White, 14% Black, and 8% Asian; 7% were Hispanic. 66% of pts had hormone receptor-positive tumors, and 76% had visceral metastases. All pts were previously treated with H, P, and T-DM1, and 17% had prior trastuzumab deruxtecan. 63% of pts had received ≥3 lines of HER2 tx for MBC (range 1-13 lines), and median interval from MBC diagnosis to randomization was 32 mos (interquartile range 22-61 mos). mPFS and ORR results are shown in the Table. One patient remained progression-free on tx at analysis. NHA was associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared to NH (HR=0.56 (80% CI 0.37-0.86, p=0.04)). No difference in PFS was observed between NHAU vs NHA (HR=1.20 (80% CI 0.84-1.73) as final estimate after closure of NHAU for futility). Of 9 pts with confirmed responses in NHA arm, 3 pts had DOR >12 mos. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were similar by tx: 61% NH, 62% NHA, and 67% NHAU. There were no grade 5 treatment-related AEs. Immune-related all grade AEs in the A-containing arms (n=79 safety-evaluable pts treated with A) included: AST increase (n=15), ALT increase (n=9), hyper/hypothyroidism (n=8), adrenal insufficiency (n=2), and pneumonitis (n=1), of which two events were grade 3 (adrenal insufficiency and AST increase) and none were grade 4. Only 3 pts (1 in NHA; 2 in NHAU) stopped trial tx for unacceptable AEs. Required baseline and on-tx biopsies were performed; PD-L1 and TIL data will be presented. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated significant improvement in PFS with addition of avelumab to NH among pts with heavily pre-treated HER2+ MBC. 4-1BB agonist did not improve PFS. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to report results of chemo/H +/- ICI in HER2+ MBC. Further investigation of ICI with chemo/H for pts with refractory HER2+ MBC is warranted, and the potential predictive value of immune biomarkers should be explored. *one-sided stratified log rank test p-value Citation Format: Adrienne Waks, Ruichao Shi, Meredith Regan, Chau Dang, Cesar Santa-Maria, Kelly Westbrook, Vandana Abramson, Rashmi Murthy, Rita Nanda, Hope Rugo, Amy Clark, Candace Mainor, Claire Dees, Valentina Hoyos, Kathy Miller, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Natasha Hunter, Sun Young Oh, Michelle DeMeo, Amanda Okpoebo, Erin Elias, Busem Kurt, Nancy Lin, Mothaffar Rimawi, Antonio Wolff, Elizabeth Mittendorf, Shom Goel, Sara Tolaney, Sherene Loi, Ian Krop. AVIATOR/TBCRC045: A randomized phase II study of vinorelbine (N) + trastuzumab (H) alone or combined with avelumab (A) +/- utomilumab (U) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT03414658) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr RF02-06.

The Efficacy and Safety of Inetetamab and Pyrotinib in Combination with Vinorelbine for Second-line Therapy and Beyond in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-institution Clinical Experience.

This study aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of inetetamab and pyrotinib in combination with vinorelbine in second-line therapy and beyond in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with HER2-positive MBC admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2021 were selected. For patients who could not receive antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) during second-line (2nd-line) or third-line and beyond (≥ 3rd-line) anti-HER2 therapy, inetetamab + pyrotinib + vinorelbine was used for treatment until unacceptable adverse events occurred or the disease progressed, as evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 every 2 cycles. The progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse reactions were recorded. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to explore the prognostic factors influencing the curative effect. Overall, 52 patients were included; 13 patients received 2nd-line treatment, and 39 patients received ≥ 3rd-line treatment. The median PFS (mPFS) for all patients treated with inetetamab + pyrotinib + vinorelbine was 7 months. The mPFS of the 2nd-line subgroup was significantly better than that of the ≥ 3rd-line subgroup (17 vs. 5 months, P = 0.001). The mPFS of the subgroups that received trastuzumab (H) or trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP) only was significantly better than that of the H or HP and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) subgroups (8 vs. 5 months, P = 0.030). The mPFS of the HER2 resistance subgroup was better than that of the HER2 refractoriness subgroup (14 vs. 7 months, P = 0.025). Cox regression analysis showed that the treatment line (2nd-line more so than ≥ 3rd-line) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. In addition, the ORR and CBR of 2nd-line patients were significantly higher than those of ≥ 3rd-line patients (69.2% vs. 30.8% and 92.3% vs. 64.1%, respectively). The most common hematological toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia, and the most common nonhematological toxicity was diarrhea. Inetetamab and pyrotinib in combination with vinorelbine have good efficacy in ≥ 2nd-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC with controllable toxicity, and the combination is a new treatment option, especially for patients who cannot use ADCs in 2nd-line treatment.

A Phase I Study of the Oral Dual-Acting Pan-PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor Bimiralisib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Bimiralisib is a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor demonstrating antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. The objectives of this study were to identify a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), a dosing schedule, and adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received oral bimiralisib to determine the MTD of one continuous (once daily) and two intermittent schedules (A: Days 1, 2 weekly; B: Days 1, 4 weekly) until progression or unacceptable AEs occurred. The MTD for the continuous schedule was 80 mg, with grade three fatigue as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). No MTD was reached with intermittent schedules, with only one DLT in schedule B. PK analysis suggested that 140 mg (schedule A) was within the biologically active dose range and was selected for further exploration. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs were hyperglycemia (76.2%) in the continuous schedule, and nausea (56-62.5%) in schedules A and B. The most frequent treatment-emergent > grade three AE for all schedules combined was hyperglycemia (28.6%, continuous schedule; 12.0%, schedule A; 12.5%, schedule B). There was one partial response in a head and neck squamous cancer patient with a NOTCH1T1997M mutation. Bimiralisib demonstrated a manageable AE profile consistent with this compound class. Intermittent schedules had fewer > grade three AEs, while also maintaining favorable PK profiles. Intermittent schedule A is proposed for further development in biomarker-selected patient populations.

Low-dose Paclitaxel with Pembrolizumab Enhances Clinical and Immunologic Responses in Platinum-refractory Urothelial Carcinoma.

Single-agent checkpoint inhibition is effective in a minority of patients with platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma; therefore, the efficacy of combining low-dose paclitaxel with pembrolizumab was tested. This was a prospective, single-arm phase II trial with key inclusion criteria of imaging progression within 12 months of platinum therapy and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤1. Treatment was pembrolizumab 200 mg day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for up to eight cycles unless progression or unacceptable adverse events (AE). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) with overall survival (OS), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and safety as key secondary endpoints. Change in circulating immune cell populations, plasma, and urinary miRs were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients were treated between April 2016 and June 2020, with median follow-up of 12.4 months. Baseline median age was 68 years, with 81% men and 78% non-Hispanic White. ORR was 33% by intention to treat and 36% in imaging-evaluable patients with three complete responses. Six-month PFS rate was 48.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 28.7-65.2] and median OS 12.4 months (95% CI: 8.7 months to not reached). Common ≥ grade 2 possibly-related AEs were anemia, lymphopenia, hyperglycemia, and fatigue; grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 56%, including two immune-mediated AEs (pneumonitis and nephritis). Responding patients had a higher percentage of circulating CD4+IFNγ+ T cells. Levels of some miRs, including plasma miR 181 and miR 223, varied in responders compared with nonresponders. The addition of low-dose paclitaxel to pembrolizumab is active and safe in platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma. We found that combining pembrolizumab with low-dose paclitaxel may be effective in patients with urothelial carcinoma progressing on platinum chemotherapy, with favorable safety profiles.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated survival results from a phase II trial (DESTINY-Breast01)

Primary analysis of the multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II DESTINY-Breast01 trial (median follow-up 11.1 months) demonstrated durable antitumor activity with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). We report updated cumulative survival outcomes with a median follow-up of 26.5 months (data cut-off 26 March 2021). Patients with HER2-positive mBC resistant or refractory to T-DM1 received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. The ORR by ICR was 62.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.5% to 69.0%] in patients who received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks (n= 184). Median OS was 29.1 months (95% CI 24.6-36.1 months). Median PFS and DoR were 19.4 months (95% CI 14.1-25.0 months) and 18.2 months (95% CI 15.0 months-not evaluable), respectively. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 183 patients (99.5%), and 99 patients (53.8%) had one or more grade ≥3 TEAEs. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in 15.8% of patients (n= 29), of which 2.7% (n= 5) were grade5. These updated results provide further evidence of sustained antitumor activity of T-DXd with a consistent safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive mBC.

A Phase II Study of Isatuximab in Combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Progressing on or after One Line of Lenalidomide-Containing Therapy

Introduction Relapse in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) is a common occurrence, resulting in a continued need for novel treatment approaches. Isatuximab (Isa), a monoclonal antibody (mAb), combined with pomalidomide (Pom) and dexamethasone (Dex), is indicated for the treatment of pts with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received ≥2 prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IsaPomDex in pts with MM relapsing for the first time after one line of treatment containing lenalidomide (Len). Methods EAE115 (NCT05298683) is an ongoing, investigator-initiated, phase II, prospective, open-label, multicenter study aiming to enroll 108 pts. Eligible pts are adults with documented MM who have evidence of progressive disease, by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, on or after treatment with only one prior line of anti-myeloma therapy with lenalidomide (≥2 cycles, alone or in combination) and a proteasome inhibitor. Pts must also have adequate bone marrow and hepatic function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤2. Excluded are pts with previous anti-myeloma therapy with any anti-CD38 mAb, pomalidomide, or stem cell transplant within 12 weeks before treatment initiation. Pts receive six 28-day cycles of Isa 10 mg/kg (once weekly [QW] by intravenous [IV] infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in cycle 1 and days 1 and 15 in subsequent cycles), Pom 4 mg (per Os on days 1-21, each cycle), and Dex 40 mg or 20 mg for pts ≥75 years old (per Os or IV on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, each cycle). Fifteen to 60 minutes before Isa infusions, patients receive pre-medications to mitigate potential infusion-related adverse reactions. Following initial 6 cycles, pts achieving at least very good partial response (VGPR) are randomized 1:1 to receive Isa (Q2W or Q4W) plus PomDex, and pts achieving <VGPR continue treatment with Isa (Q2W) plus PomDex. Treatment is given until progressive disease, death, unacceptable adverse events (AEs), lost to follow-up, or consent withdrawal. The study primarily evaluates the overall response rate (ORR; defined as partial response [PR] or better) to IsaPomDex therapy at six months. Adverse events are classified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Herein, we present safety and efficacy data for all treated patients (cut-off date 15/05/23. Results Twenty pts had received at least one dose by the cut-off date, of whom 16 (80.0%) were continuing with IsaPomDex treatment; four (20.0%) pts had discontinued due to physician or pt decision or progressive disease or death. At baseline (cycle 1, day 1), pts had a median age of 72.0 years (range: 60.0-85.0), 10 (50.0%) were male, and 13 (65.0%) had ECOG PS 0. Eleven (55.0%) pts were at stage II by the revised International Staging System, 9 (45.0%) pts had lytic bone lesions, 5 (25.0%) pts had high-risk cytogenetics, and 1 (5.0%) pt had soft-tissue plasmacytomas (Table 1). Regarding previous treatment outcomes, 14 (70.0%) pts had achieved ≥VGPR (stringent complete response, 2 [10.0%] pts; complete response, 2 [10.0%] pts; VGPR, 10 [50%] pts). Five (25%) and 1 (5.0%) pts achieved partial and minimal response, respectively. Six (30.0%) pts had received ASCT in the prior line. At a median follow-up of 3.4 (range: 0.6-6.1) months, the median number of IsaPomDex cycles received was 3.0 (range: 1.0-7.0); one (5.0%) pt received six treatment cycles. Of the 18 (90.0%) response evaluable pts (2 pts were ongoing without 2 efficacy assessments) VGPR and PR were achieved by 4/18 (22.2%) and 9/18 (50.0%) pts, respectively. ORR was achieved by 13/18 (72.2%) pts, and the median (range) time from IsaPomDex study dose to first response (≥PR) was 1.0 (range: 0.9-1.3) months. Thirteen (65.0%) pts had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). Of these pts, 10 (50.0%) had a ≥1 grade (gr)≥3 TEAE and 4 (15.0%) had ≥1 gr ≥3 serious TEAE. The most common TEAEs were neutropenia in 9 pts (45.0%), anaemia in 3 pts (15.0%) and fatigue in 3 pts (15.0%). The most common gr ≥3 TEAE was neutropenia in 7 pts (35.0%) (Table 2). Conclusions Second-line treatment with IsaPomDex in pts with MM who have progressed on or after one Len-containing line of treatment appears to be effective, although longer follow-up is needed to assess its efficacy. No new safety signals were observed with the combination.

482. SECOND-LINE OF CAMRELIZUMAB PLUS NIMOTUZUMAB IN ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA (ESCC): A SINGLE-ARM, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 2 TRIAL

Abstract Background Anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab monotherapy is recommended for the treatment of advanced second-line ESCC. However, the long-term survival is limited, and new effective treatments are needed. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is usually over-expressed in more than 50% of ESCC patients(pts), and is a potential target for the treatment of ESCC. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combination with camrelizumab and nimotuzumab (EGFR inhibitor) as second-line treatment for advanced ESCC. Methods This ongoing phase II trial in four sites in China enrolled pts aged 18–75 with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC that progressed or were intolerant after first-line treatment, and ECOG PS score of 0–1. Pts received 200 mg intravenous camrelizumab (Q2W) plus 400 mg intravenous nimotuzumab (QW) in 4-week cycles until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AEs) or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS). Results From 2/2021 to 4/2023, 28 of the planned 42 pts with an average 63 years old had been enrolled, including 18 (64%) males and 21 (75%) patients with an ECOG PS score of 1. Nine pts had previously used anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody. Among the 21 evaluable pts, 8 pts achieved partial response (PR), 13 pts stable disease (SD), illustrating an ORR of 38.0% and a DCR of 100%. Median PFS was not reached. 82.1% pts experienced adverse event(AE), with 21.4% being grade ≥ 3. The most frequent AE were RCCEP (57.1%), neutrophil count decreased (17.8%), white blood cell decreased (14.2%). Conclusions Camrelizumab plus nimotuzumab demonstrated encouraging clinical efficacy and acceptable safety as second-line treatment, and might be a favorable option for pts with advanced ESCC. The study enrollment is ongoing, and further survival and safety data will be reported in the future. Clinical trial information: NCT03766178.

TIPS-03 A PHASE 1 STUDY OF GALLIUM MALTOLATE (GAM) IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)

Abstract Glioblastoma remains the most aggressive malignant brain tumor with universally poor prognosis. New treatments are needed which target novelpathways. GBM cells have significantly greater requirements for iron and display markedly higher levels of transferrin receptors for iron uptake and ferritin for iron storage than surrounding normal astrocytes. The increased intracellular iron pool drives GBM activity. Previously, we showed that since gallium shares certain chemical properties with iron, it can inhibit malignant cell growth by disrupting tumor iron homeostasis. Recently, we reported that GaM is cytotoxic to GBM cell lines and stem cells but not to microvascular endothelial cells. In rodent orthotopically implanted human GBM xenografts, orally administered GaM reduced tumor volume and prolonged animal survival. These preclinical studies form the basis for our Phase 1 study which evaluates GaM in patients with recurrent GBM. The trial will follow a 3 + 3 phase 1 dose escalation design. Three to six patients at each dose level will receive GaM 500 mg/d, 1000 mg/d, or 1500 mg/day for a minimum of two 28-day cycles. Patients age >= 18 years with histologically confirmed GBM or molecular GBM with recurrent measurable disease are eligible. In the absence of measurable disease, pathologic confirmation of recurrence is required. Primary objectives are to determine a maximum-tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose. Safety/tolerability will be assessed. Secondary objectives include disease assessments and evaluation of PFS and OS. Correlative studies planned are sequential blood levels of gallium, iron, Tf, ferritin, and hepcidin. Available tumor tissues will be examined for the expression iron biomarkers by immunochemistry. The study is currently enrolling. Patients will receive study drug until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, patient withdrawal, or death. To date, 5 patients received GaM 500 mg/d without DLT and 4 patients started GaM 1000 mg/d.

A phase II study of olaparib (AZD2281) in patients (Pts) with metastatic/advanced urothelial carcinoma and other genitourinary (GU) tumors with DNA-repair defects.

TPS4607 Background: Olaparib is a poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in tumor cells with dysfunctional DNA damage repair (DDR) from loss of function of BRCA or other DDR genes. It improves survival in advanced ovarian, pancreatic, prostate and breast carcinoma with DDR gene alterations and is FDA approved for these indications. PARP inhibitors still have an undefined role in non-prostate GU tumors. We hypothesize that PARP inhibitors will have activity in DDR deficient tumors, regardless of histology. We are conducting a phase 2 trial of olaparib in non-prostate GU cancers with DDR gene defects. Methods: Eligible pts must have metastatic/advanced urothelial carcinoma or other non-prostate GU cancers and have measurable disease by RECIST 1.1. Pts in Cohorts 1 and 2 must harbor tumor or liquid pathologic DDR alterations identified by FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) panel and reviewed by a molecular genetics review panel: Cohort 1 includes BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BAP1, MSH2, PALB2, and BRIP1 alterations, and pts with high tumor mutational burden (TMB) (>15 mutations/megabase); Cohort 2 (exploratory cohort) includes ABL1, ATR, ATRX, BARD1, BRD4, CCND1, CHEK1, CHEK2, DOTIL, FANCC, FANCE, FANCG, FANCL, IKBKE, MEN1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NPM1, PMS2, POLD1, POLE, RAD51, SMARCB1, STEK11, and TP53 alterations. Cohort 3 (natural history) will include pts without pathologic alterations in any Cohort 1 or 2 genes. Pts with eligible gene alterations (Cohorts 1 and 2) will be given olaparib 300mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse events, withdrawal of consent or death. They will have circulating tumor cells (CTCs) collected at baseline and every 4 weeks, and CT restaging every 8 weeks. Pts in Cohort 3 will receive standard of care treatment and have baseline CTC collection and be followed for survival. The primary objective is to evaluate the objective response rates (ORR) in Cohorts 1 and 2. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. In these cohorts, the trial will have a Simon optimal two-stage design. In Cohort 1, 25 evaluable pts will be required to provide 90% power with alpha = 0.1 to differentiate between a promising ORR of 30% versus an unacceptably low ORR of 10%. In Cohort 2, 35 evaluable pts will be required to provide 90% power with alpha = 0.05 to differentiate between a promising ORR of 30% versus an unacceptably low ORR of 10%. Exploratory objectives include estimating the distribution of DDR alterations in non-prostate GU malignancies, assessing the effectiveness of NGS in detecting DDR alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), assessing levels of baseline CTCs and changes in CTC level with olaparib, and correlating with clinical outcomes. This is an ECTCN network clinical trial and is open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03375307 .

Efficacy, safety, and molecular response predictors of oral ixazomib and short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL.

Patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) generally require treatment but experience normal survival, emphasizing the need for simpler, safer therapies. Proteasome inhibitors target aberrant signaling pathways within iNHL and have manageable toxicities. We evaluated the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib as initial monotherapy, and combined with rituximab, for first-line treatment of iNHL. Treatment-naïve patients with iNHL needing therapy received oral ixazomib 4 mg weekly until progressive disease or unacceptable adverse events. A 4-week course of rituximab was added during month 7. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) during the ixazomib monotherapy window. Correlations included gene expression profiling and response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Thirty-three patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) (n= 20), marginal zone lymphoma (n= 7), and other iNHL were treated with a median follow-up of 30.3 months. During the 6-month ixazomib window, the ORR was 24%, including 35% in FL. The best ORR over the entire study period was 52% overall and 65% in FL; complete response was achieved in 33% and 45%, respectively. The median duration of response was 25.8 months (range, 0-49.7), and the 24-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-67) and 91% (95% CI, 74-97), respectively. Ixazomib was well tolerated. Baseline downregulation of proteasome genes, PSMB9 (P= .03) and PSMB8 (P= .007), were associated with response. All evaluated patients generated anti-S antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with a median of 254.9 binding arbitrary unit per mL. Ixazomib demonstrated efficacy alone and with short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL while exhibiting favorable toxicity, convenience, and retention of the B-cell immune response. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02339922.

PH-sensitive molybdenum (Mo)-based polyoxometalate nanoclusters have therapeutic efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease by counteracting ferroptosis

Current therapeutic drugs for ulcerative colitis (UC) remained inadequate due to drug dependence and unacceptable adverse events. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) played a critical role in the occurrence and development of UC, which most likely benefited from treatment in scavenging ROS. In this study, we developed a pH-sensitive molybdenum-based polyoxometalate (POM) nanocluster, which might contribute to site specific colonic delivery and enhance systemic efficacy of UC treatment. Our results demonstrated that POM displayed robust ROS scavenging ability in vitro. POM could significantly alleviate the enteric symptoms and inflammatory indicators in DSS-induced UC mouse models. Flow cytometry showed an effective diminishment of macrophages, neutrophils and T cells infiltration after POM administration in UC models. Also, for the first time, we demonstrated that POM interfered with metabolic pathway associated to oxidative stress and partially improved the abnormal production of intestinal metabolites in UC to some extent. Benefiting from the ROS scavenging ability, POM attenuated ferroptosis in DSS induced UC, as evidenced by increase of GSH, down-expression of GPX4 and improvement in mitochondrial morphological changes. Meanwhile, there were no side effects on normal tissues. Thus, our powerful therapeutic effects pioneered the application of POM for safer and more effective POM-based UC therapy.

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan vs irinotecan as second-line treatment in pancreatic cancer patients: a randomized-controlled open-label Phase II study.

Limited second-line therapeutic options are available for metastasis pancreatic cancer (mPC). We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan (IROX) in mPC patients. This is an open-label, Phase 2, randomized study of mPC patients (aged 18-75 years) who failed when using gemcitabine plus S-1 as first-line therapy. Block randomization with a block size of four was used to randomly assign patients (1:1) between October 2015 and December 2017 to receive either IROX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 160 mg/m2) or irinotecan monotherapy (irinotecan 180 mg/m2) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate, and adverse event rate. A total of 74 patients were enrolled in this study, including 44 males and 30 females, with an average age of 61 years. The median overall survival was 10.2 and 6.7 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-1.2; P = 0.20) and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 and 2.3 months (adjusted HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < 0.01) in the IROX group and irinotecan group, respectively. The overall response rates were 18.4% (7/38) in the IROX group and 5.5% (2/36) in the irinotecan group (P = 0.06). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 34% (13/38) of patients in the IROX group and 19% (7/36) of patients in the irinotecan group (P = 0.15). IROX had no significant survival benefit over irinotecan monotherapy in our study. However, IROX reduced the risk of disease progression by 60%, with acceptable toxicity.

Isatuximab Plus Pomalidomide/Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide/Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (ICARIA-MM): Characterization of Subsequent Antimyeloma Therapies

Introduction: Based on the primary analysis of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study (NCT02990338), isatuximab (Isa), an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) in several countries for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least 2 prior treatments, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Here, we describe updated, longer-term efficacy data following subsequent therapy. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to Isa-Pd (n=154) or Pd (n=153), with stratification by age (<75 vs ≥75) and number of prior lines (2-3 versus more than >3). Isa 10 mg/kg was administered weekly for the first 4-week cycle and every 2 weeks thereafter. In each cycle, both treatment arms received pomalidomide 4 mg (days 1-21) and weekly dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Treatment was given until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse events, or patient choice. The final overall survival analysis was planned when 220 death events occurred. Results: As of March 14, 2022, 16 (10.4%) patients receiving Isa-Pd and 3 (2.0%) patients receiving Pd were still on treatment; 101 (65.6%) and 117 (76.5%) patients, respectively, discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Median treatment duration was longer with Isa-Pd vs Pd (47.6 vs 24.0 weeks). After a median 52.4 months of follow-up, a clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) benefit was observed in favor of Isa-Pd vs Pd after 220 events (Jan 27, 2022; median: 24.6 vs 17.7 months; hazard ratio 0.776 [95% CI: 0.594-1.1015]; one-sided P=0.0319; significance level: P=0.02). Further antimyeloma treatment was given to 102 (66.2%) patients receiving Isa-Pd and 119 (77.8%) patients receiving Pd (regardless of the reason for treatment discontinuation in both arms), with a median of 2 and 1 further regimens, respectively. Of the patients receiving subsequent therapy, 22.5% (23/102) in the Isa-Pd arm and 59.7% (71/119) in the Pd arm received daratumumab. The most common further antimyeloma treatments for patients in the Isa-Pd arm were corticosteroids (n=88/102; 86.3%), alkylating agents (n=71/102; 69.6%), and proteasome inhibitors (n=70/102; 68.6%); the most common treatment received in the first subsequent line was a proteasome inhibitor (n=54/102; 52.9%). The most common further antimyeloma treatments for patients in the Pd arm were corticosteroids (n=94/119; 79.0%), monoclonal antibodies (n=75/119; 63.0%), and proteasome inhibitors (n=69/119; 58.0%); the most common treatment received in the first subsequent line was daratumumab (n=52/119; 43.7%). The overall response rate (ORR) for the first subsequent line of therapy was 28.8% (23/80) for the Isa-Pd arm and 35.3% (30/85) for the Pd arm. The ORR for patients receiving daratumumab-based regimens as the first subsequent line was 25.0% (2/8) for the Isa-Pd arm and 40.5% (17/42) for the Pd arm. The ORR for patients receiving daratumumab as monotherapy or with steroids in any subsequent line was 12.5% (1/8) for the Isa-Pd arm and 36.7% (11/30) for the Pd arm. The ORR for patients receiving daratumumab in combination with immunomodulatory agents, alkylating agents, or proteasome inhibitors in any subsequent line was 28.6% (4/14) for the Isa-Pd arm and 44.8% (13/29) for the Pd arm. Progression-free survival (PFS) on first subsequent line for patients receiving daratumumab was 2.2 months for the Isa-Pd arm and 5.7 months for the Pd arm. PFS on first subsequent line for patients receiving treatment excluding daratumumab was 4.6 months for the Isa-Pd arm and 5.2 months for the Pd arm. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that the majority of patients with RRMM require multiple lines of subsequent therapy, even after receiving a triplet combination that includes a monoclonal antibody. The immediate use of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with currently available combinations appears to be less effective in the Isa-Pd arm. The more frequent use of subsequent daratumumab in Pd (59.7%) compared with Isa-Pd (22.5%) may have affected the power to detect statistically significant OS given the sample size, as well as reflecting the efficacy of this approach in the management of RRMM. Funding: Sanofi.

Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: IKEMA Subgroup Analysis by Prior Transplantation

In the era of highly active novel agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the role, ideal timing, and impact of transplantation on further therapy after relapse remains a matter of debate. The impact of prior transplantation on treatment benefit from monoclonal antibodies in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) is largely unknown. Few Phase 3 studies of monoclonal antibody combinations with proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulatory agents have reported outcomes according to transplantation status. This subgroup analysis examined efficacy and safety in patients from the Phase 3 IKEMA study with and without previous transplantation. IKEMA (NCT03275285) was a randomized, open-label, multinational, parallel-group Phase 3 study that investigated isatuximab (Isa), an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, combined with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd; experimental group) versus Kd (control group) in 302 patients with RRMM and 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Patients were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to either Isa-Kd or Kd, with stratification by number of prior lines (1 versus more than 1) and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage (I or II versus III versus not classified). Treatment was given until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse events, or patient choice. Of the 302 randomized patients in IKEMA, 185 (61.3%) had received a prior transplant, comprising 116 of 179 (64.8%) patients in the Isa-Kd arm and 69 of 123 (56.1%) patients in the Kd arm. After a median follow-up of 20.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with prior transplant was not reached with Isa-Kd versus 19.15 months with Kd (hazard ratio [HR]=0.60; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.16). After a median follow-up of 20.8 months, median PFS in patients without prior transplant was not reached with Isa-Kd versus 18.99 months with Kd (HR=0.44; 99% CI, 0.18-1.05). The overall response rate in patients with prior transplant was 87.9% (Isa-Kd) versus 85.5% (Kd). More patients in the Isa-Kd arm achieved a complete response or better compared with the Kd arm (43.1% versus 29.0%). The overall response rate in patients without prior transplant was 84.1% (Isa-Kd) versus 79.6% (Kd). More patients in the Isa-Kd arm achieved a complete response or better compared with the Kd arm (33.3% versus 25.9%). The minimal residual disease negativity rate was higher with Isa-Kd versus Kd in patients with (31.9% versus 13.0%) and without prior transplantation (25.4% versus 13.0%). In patients with prior transplant, Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common with Isa-Kd; however, no increases in serious TEAEs or definitive treatment discontinuations were seen versus Kd. Among patients without prior transplant, serious treatment-related TEAEs were similar, and there were fewer TEAEs leading to definitive discontinuation with Isa-Kd. The most common Grade 3 or higher TEAEs in patients with and without prior transplant were hypertension and pneumonia. For patients who underwent prior transplantation, Isa-Kd is an effective treatment option. Overall, these data demonstrate that Isa-Kd represents a standard of care for patients with RRMM, regardless of prior transplant status.

Survival Analysis and Clinical Outcomes between Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Carboplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced-stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Single-center Cohort Study.

Palliative chemotherapy using platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was recommended as one of the standard treatments in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with negative EGFR mutation. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) and those treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine (CG). We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing PC and CG at Hatyai Hospital between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was survival analysis, and the secondary outcome was chemotherapy-related adverse events, and the rate and reason for stopping chemotherapy. The median overall survivals of both groups was comparable (9.0 months for the PC group and 9.6 months for the CG group; log-rank, p=0.287). The CG group had a higher incidence of adverse events (89.7% vs. 77.9%, p=0.010) and tended to have a lower rate of chemotherapy discontinuation (29.6% vs. 41.2%, p=0.080) than the PC group. In the multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR]=0.351; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.158-0.780; p=0.010) and higher performance status (OR=76.374; 95%CI, 32.533-179.295; p<0.001) were independent predictive factors for stopping chemotherapy. In the proportional hazards model, the factors associated with decreased survival included higher performance status (hazard ratio [HR]=1.939; 95%CI, 1.388-2.709; P<0.001) and discontinuation of chemotherapy (HR=2.572; 95%CI, 1.792-3.691; p=<0.001). These two platinum-based regimens had comparable effects on overall survival. The CG group had a higher incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events, while the PC group had a marginally significantly higher rate of stopping chemotherapy from unacceptable adverse events and deterioration of patients' clinical status.

A Real-World Study of Optimal Treatment with Anlotinib First-Line Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PurposeTo observe the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in a real-word environment, explore the optimal treatment regimen for patients with aHCC using anlotinib as a first-line treatment.Patients and MethodsData from 62 patients with aHCC who received anlotinib single-drug first-line therapy between February 2019 and November 2021. Patients received anlotinib monotherapy, which may be interrupted or discontinued or changed in the event of unacceptable or severe adverse events (AEs) or failure to inhibit tumor progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsAmong the 62 patients, in the best overall response assessment, there were 12 with complete response (CR; 19.4%), 17 with partial response (PR; 27.4%), 25 with stable disease (SD; 40.3%), and 8 with progressive disease (PD; 14.5%). The ORR and DCR were 46.8% and 87.1%, respectively. Among the 11 patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors after disease progression, three (27.3%) had CR, one (9.1%) had PR, three (27.3%) had SD, and four (36.4%) had PD. Therefore, the ORR and DCR were 36.4% and 63.6%, respectively. The median PFS for anlotinib monotherapy was 7.37 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.88–8.86) and the median OS did not reach. AEs occurred in 95.2% of patients during anlotinib monotherapy, with the most common being thrombocytopenia (51.6%). The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 38.7%.ConclusionAnlotinib is effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment for patients with aHCC. Treatment with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors after disease progression has also shown preliminary efficacy and safety; therefore, sequential therapy with anlotinib-TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors may be an effective treatment for patients with aHCC.

521MO Efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy (PM) for advanced clear cell gynaecological cancer (CCGC): Phase II PEACOCC trial

Advanced CCGC has poor prognosis with 2nd line objective response rates (ORR) to standard chemotherapy ranging from 0-8%. As PD-L1 expression, PD-1+ tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, pro-inflammatory cytokine signalling, high tumour mutational burden and preliminary clinical activity with PD-1 inhibitors are described in CCGC, we investigated PM for advanced CCGC. PEACOCC is a Phase II, multicentre, single arm, academic, UK trial in patients (pts) with advanced CCGC who had ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy with progression (PD) at study entry. Pembrolizumab 200mg iv q21 days was given until PD (RECIST v1.1), unacceptable adverse event (AE), 2 years (y) PM reached, patient or clinician decision. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks (w) (H0≤15%; H1≥33%; 5% 1-sided a; 90% power). Secondary endpoints included ORR, duration of response (DOR), PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety. From 4/3/19–20/10/21 49pts were enrolled, 48 evaluable. Median age 58.5y (32–77y), ECOG 0/1 54.2%/45.8%, 85.4% ovarian CCGC. Median prior lines systemic therapy 2 (1–6); 19pts (39.6%) had received anti-angiogenic therapy. 42pts completed median 4 cycles PM (1–25), 6pts (12.5%) continue PM. 16.7% pts had Grade (G)3 treatment-related AE (TRAE) of hyperthyroidism (n=2), acute kidney injury (AKI), raised alanine aminotransferase, raised alkaline phosphatase, anaemia, encephalitis and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). There were no G4 or G5 TRAE. 3pts (6.3%) discontinued PM due to TRAEs. The PFS rate at 12w was 43.8% (90%CI:31.5-56.6) exceeding the pre-stated lower bound of 15%. Best ORR was 25.0% (90%CI:15.1-37.3) [1 complete, 11 partial], with 1y DOR rate 47.7% (95%CI:14.1-75.6). After a median follow-up of 2.1y, median PFS was 12.2w (95%CI:5.9-32.9) and median OS 71.0w (95%CI:29.1-137.6). The PEACOCC trial indicates that PM is a highly effective therapy in heavily pre-treated pts with advanced CCGC: 43.8% pts were alive and progression-free at 12w. Furthermore, clinical outcomes were durable with limited toxicity. These promising results justify consideration of pembrolizumab monotherapy as a new standard-of-care for advanced CCGC.

Abstract CT242: KRYSTAL-16: A phase I/Ib trial of adagrasib (MRTX849) in combination with palbociclib in patients with advanced solid tumors with KRASG12C mutation

Abstract Background: KRAS is a key mediator of the RAS/MAPK signaling cascade and promotes cellular growth and proliferation. It is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer, and KRASG12C mutations occur in 3-4% of colorectal cancers (CRC) and in up to 14% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The investigational agent adagrasib, a potent, covalent inhibitor of KRASG12C, irreversibly and selectively binds to KRASG12C and locks it in its inactive state. Adagrasib was optimized for favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, including long half-life (~24 h), dose-dependent PK, and central nervous system penetration. Initial results have shown encouraging antitumor activity and tolerability of adagrasib monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with CRC or NSCLC harboring KRASG12C mutations. Cyclin D1 and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 are downstream of signaling pathways that lead to cellular proliferation. Palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, disrupts cancer cell proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest by preventing the G1 to S phase transition. Preclinical data in KRASG12C mouse models suggest enhanced antitumor activity when combining adagrasib and palbociclib compared with either agent as a monotherapy. Trial Design: KRYSTAL-16 (NCT05178888) is a multicenter phase I/Ib trial evaluating the safety, PK, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity of adagrasib in combination with palbociclib in patients with solid tumors harboring a KRASG12C mutation previously treated with at least 1 standard therapy. The first stage of the trial will comprise a PK lead-in to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions. Exploration of the dose and regimen will continue for the combination of adagrasib (starting dose 400 mg BID) and palbociclib, with expansion cohorts implemented as applicable to further evaluate the safety and preliminary clinical activity of the combination. Decisions regarding dose escalation, expansion, or de-escalation will be determined using the modified Toxicity Probability Interval (mTPI-2) design. Study endpoints include safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase II combination dose regimen (RP2D), plasma PK parameters, and preliminary clinical activity (objective response rate [RECIST v1.1], duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival). Patients will receive treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, patient withdrawal, or death. This study will be enrolling at sites in the United States. Citation Format: David Sommerhalder, Jeena Thevathasan, Xenophon Ianopulos, Weining Volinn, David Hong. KRYSTAL-16: A phase I/Ib trial of adagrasib (MRTX849) in combination with palbociclib in patients with advanced solid tumors with KRASG12C mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT242.

Camrelizumab in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment for nonoperative head and neck cancer: A comparative study.

6063 Background: We hypothesized that concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus concurrent and adjuvant camrelizumab as first-line treatmentwas associated with improved survival compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for nonoperative locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of this comparative study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of CCRT plus concurrent and adjuvant camrelizumab versus CCRT alone in nonoperative locoregionally advanced HNSCC. Methods: One hundred and eighty patients with nonoperative locoregionally advanced HNSCC (cancer of the oral cavity, oropharyngeal cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer and laryngeal cancer) received either CCRT plus concurrent and adjuvant camrelizumab (camrelizumab + CCRT group, n = 90) or CCRT alone (CCRT alone group, n = 90). Patients in both groups received curative cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The radiation dose was 70 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction). In camrelizumab + CCRT group, concurrent camrelizumab (200mg/day on days 1, 22, 43) was added to CCRT, followed by adjuvant camrelizumab (200mg, every 3 weeks for 6 months or until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events or withdrawal of consent). Results: Compared with CCRT alone, the addition of concurrent and adjuvant camrelizumab significantly improved complete response (CR) rates (92.2% vs. 80.0%; P = 0.018), 3-year disease free survival (DFS, 72.2% vs. 56.7%; P = 0.029), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS, 76.7% vs. 61.1%; P = 0.024), and overall survival (OS, 78.9% vs. 63.3%; P = 0.033). Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was higher in the camrelizumab + CCRT group (6.7% vs. 0.0%; P = 0.013). No statistically significant differences in other acute (mucositis, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, etc.) and late toxic effects (mucosal necrosis, trismus, cranial nerve palsy, etc.) were observed between the two groups. The addition of camrelizumab (CCRT plus camrelizumab vs. CCRT alone) was a significant independent prognostic factor for 3-year DFS, LRRFS and OS (P = 0.038, P = 0.032, and P = 0.048, respectively). Conclusions: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus concurrent and adjuvant camrelizumab as first-line treatment is associated with a considerable survival benefit, with acceptable adverse events, as compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, among patients with nonoperative locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Our ongoing prospective clinical trial (registered with chictr.org.cn, number ChiCTR2200056298) will further investigate the efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy for HNSCC.