Ultrasound-stimulated Microbubbles Research Articles

A Promising Therapeutic Strategy of Combining Acoustically Stimulated Nanobubbles and Existing Cancer Treatments.

In recent years, ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMBs) have gained great attention because of their wide theranostic applications. However, due to their micro-size, reaching the targeted site remains a challenge. At present, ultrasound-stimulated nanobubbles (USNBs) have attracted particular interest, and their small size allows them to extravasate easily in the blood vessels penetrating deeper into the tumor vasculature. Incorporating USNBs with existing cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or radiation therapy in several preclinical models has been demonstrated to have a profound effect on solid tumors. In this review, we provide an understanding of the composition and formation of nanobubbles (NBs), followed by the recent progress of the therapeutic combinatory effect of USNBs and other cancer therapies in cancer treatment.

Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles to enhance radiotherapy: A scoping review.

Primarily used as ultrasound contrast agents, microbubbles have recently emerged as a versatile therapeutic vector that can be 'burst' to deliver payloads in the presence of suitably optimised ultrasound fields. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) have recently demonstrated improvements in treatment outcomes across a variety of clinical applications. This scoping review investigates whether this potential translates into the context of radiation therapy by evaluating the application of this technology across all three phases of radiation action. Primary research articles, excluding poster presentations and conference proceedings, were identified through systematic searches of the PubMed NCBI/Medline, Embase/OVID, Web of Science and CINAHL/EBSCOhost databases, with additional articles identified via manual Google Scholar searching. Articles were dual screened for inclusion using the Covidence systematic review platform and classified against all three phases of radiation action. Overall, 57 eligible publications from a total of 1389 identified articles were included in the review, with studies dating back to 2012. Study heterogeneity prevented formal statistical analysis; however, most articles reported improved outcomes using USMB in the presence of radiation compared to that of radiation alone. These improvements appear to result from the use of USMB as either a biovascular disruptor causing tumour cell damage via indirect mechanisms, or as a localised treatment vector that directly increases tumour cell uptake of other therapeutic and physical agents designed to enhance radiation action. USMB demonstrate exciting potential to enhance the effects of radiation treatments due to their versatility and capacity to targetall three phases of radiation action.

Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles enhances radiosensitivity in cervical cancer

Background Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (USMB) therapy has proven efficacy of targeting tumor vasculature and enhancing the effect of radiation in tumor xenografts. In this investigation, we studied whether this treatment enhances the sensitivity of cervical cancer to radiation. Methods Human cervical cancer (ME-180 and SiHa) cells were treated with USMB or exposed to radiation (0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy) or radiation (8 Gy) in combination with USMB. Clone formation assay and CCK-8 assay were used to analyze the proliferation capacity of cells. Apoptosis and DNA double-strand breaks were detected using flow cytometry and immunofluorescence staining of gamma-H2AX (γ-H2AX), respectively. Matrigel tubule formation was performed to evaluate the angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. In xenograft model of SiHa cells, tumor tissue expression of CD31 was detected by immunohistochemistry. Results USMB and radiation synergistically restrained the growth of ME-180 and SiHa cells. USMB promoted radiation-induced apoptosis by enhancing the levels of proapoptotic proteins. Furthermore, USMB enhanced radiation-induced γ-H2AX foci to induce DNA double-strand breaks in cervical cancer cells. USMB in combination with radiation reduced the angiogenic capacity of endothelial cells in vitro. Moreover, USMB strengthened the inhibitory effect of radiation on tumor growth and angiogenesis in xenograft models. Conclusion In conclusion, USMB exposure effectively enhanced the destructive effect of radiation on cervical cancer, suggesting that USMB might be a promising sensitizer of radiotherapy to treat cervical cancer.

288 Enhancing Radioresponse using Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles in Murine Head and Neck Cancer

288 Enhancing Radioresponse using Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles in Murine Head and Neck Cancer

Ultrasound-stimulated Microbubbles for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Cells with Radiation and Nanoparticles: In vitro Study.

This study aims to investigate the radiation enhancement effects of ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) with X-rays and nanoparticles on pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Sonazoid™ microbubbles were used for USMB treatment with a commercially available ultrasound unit. The characterization of the microbubbles before and after ultrasound exposure with different mechanical parameters was evaluated microscopically. Two pancreatic cancer cell lines, MIAPaCa-2 and PANC-1, were treated with different concentrations of microbubbles in combination with 150 kVp X-rays and hydrogen peroxide-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Cell viability was evaluated using a water-soluble tetrazolium dye and a colony formation assay. In addition, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by the combined treatment were assessed. The number of burst microbubbles increased with ultrasound's higher mechanical index and the exposure time. A significant radiation enhancement effect with a significant increase in ROS levels was observed in MIAPaCa-2 cells treated with USMB and 6 Gy X-rays, whereas it was not significant in PANC-1 cells treated with the same. When a higher concentration of USMB was applied with X-rays, no radiation enhancement effects were observed in either cell line. Moreover, there was no radiation enhancement effect by USMB between cells treated with and without nanoparticles. The results indicate that USMB treatment can additively enhance the therapeutic efficacy of radiation therapy on pancreatic cancer cells, while the synergistic enhancement effects are likely to be cell type and microbubble concentration dependent. In addition, USMB did not improve the efficacy of nanoparticle-induced radiosensitization in the current setting.

Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for head and neck cancer: A phase 1 clinical trial

Background and purposePreclinical research demonstrated that the exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) to focussed ultrasound within the targeted tumour upregulates pro-apoptotic pathways and enhances radiation-induced tumour cell death. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (MRgFUS-MB) for head and neck cancers (HN). Materials and methodsThis prospective phase 1 clinical trial included patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent HN cancer (except nasopharynx malignancies) for whom locoregional radiotherapy with radical- or palliative-intent as deemed appropriate. Patients with contraindications for microbubble administration or contrast-enhanced MR were excluded. MR-coupled focussed ultrasound sonicated intravenously administered microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. Patients receiving 5–10 and 33–35 radiation fractions were planned for 2 and 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments, respectively. Primary endpoint was toxicity per CTCAEv5.0. Secondary endpoint was tumour response at 3 months per RECIST 1.1 criteria. ResultsTwelve patients were enrolled between Jun/2020 and Nov/2023, but 1 withdrew consent. Eleven patients were included in safety analysis. Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 0.3–38). Most patients had oropharyngeal cancer (55 %) and received 20–30 Gy/5–10 fractions (63 %). No systemic toxicity or MRgFUS-MB-related adverse events occurred. The most severe acute adverse events were radiation-related grade 3 toxicities in 6 patients (55 %; dermatitis in 3, mucositis in 1, dysphagia in 6). No radiation necrosis or grade 4/5 toxicities were reported. 8 patients were included in the 3-month tumour response assessment: 4 had partial response (50 %), 3 had complete response (37.5 %), and 1 had progressive disease (12.5 %). ConclusionsMRgFUS-MB treatment was safe and associated with high rates of tumour response at 3 months.

Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for breast cancer: A Phase 1 clinical trial.

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy is combined with focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (FUS-MB) treatment. The acoustic exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) within the target volume causes bubble cavitation, which induces perturbation of tumour vasculature and activates endothelial cell apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Subsequent irradiation of a microbubble-sensitised tumour causes rapid increased tumour death. The study here presents the mature safety and efficacy outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB) treatment, a radioenhancement therapy for breast cancer. This prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase 1 clinical trial included patients with stages I-IV breast cancer with in situ tumours for whom breast or chest wall radiotherapy was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04431674). Patients were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or microbubble administration. Patients underwent 2 to 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments throughout radiotherapy. An MR-coupled focussed ultrasound device operating at 800 kHz and 570 kPa peak negative pressure was used to sonicate intravenously administrated microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were tumour response at 3 months and local control (LC). A total of 21 female patients presenting with 23 primary breast tumours were enrolled and allocated to intervention between August/2020 and November/2022. Three patients subsequently withdrew consent and, therefore, 18 patients with 20 tumours were included in the safety and LC analyses. Two patients died due to progressive metastatic disease before 3 months following treatment completion and were excluded from the tumour response analysis. The prescribed radiation doses were 20 Gy/5 fractions (40%, n = 8/20), 30 to 35 Gy/5 fractions (35%, n = 7/20), 30 to 40 Gy/10 fractions (15%, n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (10%, n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3 to 29). Radiation dermatitis was the most common acute toxicity (Grade 1 in 16/20, Grade 2 in 1/20, and Grade 3 in 2/20). One patient developed grade 1 allergic reaction possibly related to microbubbles administration. At 3 months, 18 tumours were evaluated for response: 9 exhibited complete response (50%, n = 9/18), 6 partial response (33%, n = 6/18), 2 stable disease (11%, n = 2/18), and 1 progressive disease (6%, n = 1/18). Further follow-up of responses indicated that the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LC rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84%, 100%]), 88% (95% CI [75%, 100%]), and 76% (95% CI [54%, 100%]), respectively. The study's limitations include variable tumour sizes and dose fractionation regimens and the anticipated small sample size typical for a Phase 1 clinical trial. MRgFUS-MB is an innovative radioenhancement therapy associated with a safe profile, potentially promising responses, and durable LC. These results warrant validation in Phase 2 clinical trials. clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04431674.

Optimal Treatment Parameters for Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles in Upregulating Proliferation and Stemness of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Ultrasound-targeted microbubble disruption (UTMD) is a widely used technique to improve the differentiation and proliferation capacity of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), but the optimal therapeutic parameters for UTMD are unclear. In this study, we aimed to find the appropriate peak negative pressure (PNP), which is a key parameter for enhancing the stemness properties and proliferation of MSCs. Experiments were performed in UTMD group, ultrasound (US) group under different PNP exposure conditions (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MPa), and control group. Apoptosis safety was analyzed by flow cytometry and MSC proliferation was measured at 12, 24, and 36 hours after irradiation by cell counting kit 8. The expression of the stemness genes NANOG, OCT-4, and SOX-2 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The results showed that the 1.5 MPa UTMD-treated group had the highest proliferation capacity of MSCs at 24 hours. ELISA or quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction results showed that UTMD treatment of the 1.5 MPa group significantly upregulated the expression of the stemness genes NANOG, SOX-2, and OCT-4. In conclusion, the appropriate peak PNP value of UTMD was 1.5 MPa, and 1.5 MPa-mediated UTMD group obviously promoted MSCs proliferation and maintained stemness by upregulating the expression of stemness genes.

The role of fluid flow patterns in microbubble-mediated endothelial cell membrane permeabilization

Blood flow dynamics vary throughout the circulatory system, influencing the pathophysiology of vascular endothelium. We investigated endothelial cell response to ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles across diverse anatomical sites by mimicking assorted blood flow patterns. First, we examined the effect of culture condition on cell sensitivity to sonication by culturing HUVECs either statically or under pulsatile flow (8 or 16 dyn/cm2) for two days. Flow chambers were then co-perfused with microbubbles and propidium iodide under pulsatile flow (8 or 16 dyn/cm2) and sonicated (1MHz, 20 cycles, 1ms PRI, 300kPa) using an acoustically coupled microscope. Additionally, in a subset of studies we investigated ultrasound-assisted endothelial permeability under both pulsatile and oscillatory flow patterns. Compared to static, cells cultured under pulsatile flow resulted in 1.2 to 2.0-fold increase in the percentage of permeabilized endothelial cells (p < 0.0001). Next, compared to sonication under laminar flow (15–30 ml/min), endothelial permeability was significantly augmented under pulsatile flow, ranging from 1.3 to 2.1-fold. Additionally, compared to laminar flow, oscillatory flow at ∼16 ml/min with 0.5 Hz oscillation resulted in a 1.76-fold enhancement in cell perforation, yet yielded no observable permeability at slower flow rates (∼8 ml/min). These findings highlight the influence of local blood flow dynamics on ultrasound-mediated cell permeabilization.

Ultrasound-Based Radiation Enhancement: Concepts, Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications.

Microbubbles have emerged as versatile carriers used both for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Microbubbles in the presence of ultrasound waves undergo cavitation, generating bioeffects near the cell's vicinity. Studies have shown ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) to cause mechanical perturbation of endothelial cells, resulting in acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase)-induced ceramide production. Disruption of endothelial cells further causes vascular deterioration, leading to secondary tumor cell death. These effects are known to be synergistically higher when USMB is combined with radiation. This paper provides insight into the use of USMB as a potential radioenhancer. The possible underlying mechanism and therapeutic effects of combining USMB and radiation therapy are also presented.

Synchronous Intravital Imaging and Cavitation Monitoring of Antivascular Focused Ultrasound in Tumor Microvasculature Using Monodisperse Low Boiling Point Nanodroplets.

Focused ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles can induce blood flow shutdown and ischemic necrosis at higher pressures in an approach termed antivascular ultrasound. Combined with conventional therapies of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy, this approach has demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and profound synergistic antitumor effects. However, the lower cavitation threshold of microbubbles can potentially yield off-target damage that the polydispersity of clinical agent may further exacerbate. Here we investigate the use of a monodisperse nanodroplet formulation for achieving antivascular effects in tumors. We first develop stable low boiling point monodisperse lipid nanodroplets and examine them as an alternative agent to mediate antivascular ultrasound. With synchronous intravital imaging and ultrasound monitoring of focused ultrasound-stimulated nanodroplets in tumor microvasculature, we show that nanodroplets can trigger blood flow shutdown and do so with a sharper pressure threshold and with fewer additional events than conventionally used microbubbles. We further leverage the smaller size and prolonged pharmacokinetic profile of nanodroplets to allow for potential passive accumulation in tumor tissue prior to antivascular ultrasound, which may be a means by which to promote selective tumor targeting. We find that vascular shutdown is accompanied by inertial cavitation and complex-order sub- and ultraharmonic acoustic signatures, presenting an opportunity for effective feedback control of antivascular ultrasound.

Augmentation of tumour perfusion by ultrasound and microbubbles: A preclinical study

BackgroundHypoperfusion and the resulting hypoxia in solid tumours are critical causes of treatment resistance. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) enhance tumour perfusion in a mechanism named the “sononeoperfusion” effect, which may relieve tumour hypoperfusion and hypoxia. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal mechanical index (MI) and therapeutic ultrasound exposure time for the sononeoperfusion effect and preliminarily explore the mechanism of sononeoperfusion and its effect on tumours. MethodsA total of 155 mice bearing MC38 tumours were included in this study. A modified diagnostic ultrasound and microbubbles (Zhifuxian) was used for USMB treatment. Tumour perfusion was evaluated by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Hoechst 33342. The therapeutic pulse was operated with MIs of 0.1 to 0.5. The ultrasound exposure time was set from 150 s to 600 s. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) inhibition and NO, ATP, and phospho-eNOS (p-eNOS) detection were performed to explore the mechanisms of sononeoperfusion. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and tumour oxygen partial pressure (pO2) represent hypoxic tumour conditions. ResultsTumour perfusion was increased after USMB treatment at MIs of 0.1–0.4 and ultrasound exposure times of 150 s to 600 s, with optimal augmentation achieved at an MI of 0.3 and ultrasound exposure time of 450 s. The mean fluorescence intensity of Hoechst 33342 after USMB treatment was stronger than that of the control group. Biochemical assays showed a significant increase in ATP, p-eNOS and NO after USMB treatment. PO2 in tumour tissue increased significantly after USMB treatment and was maintained for more than 20 min. ConclusionsThe best sononeoperfusion effect was obtained with an MI of 0.3 and an ultrasound exposure time of 450 s. The effect is most likely related to NO and ATP increases. The sononeoperfusion effect might be a novel way to ameliorate tumour hypoperfusion and hypoxia.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Breast Tumor Response to Combined Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles and Hyperthermia Therapy Using Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Texture Analysis Method.

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a noninvasive imaging technique that can be used for assessing response to anticancer treatment. In the present study, tumor cell death response to the ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) and hyperthermia (HT) treatment was monitored in vivo using QUS. Human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231) were grown in mice and were treated with HT (10, 30, 50, and 60 minutes) alone, or in combination with USMB. Treatment effects were examined using QUS with a center frequency of 25 MHz (bandwidth range: 16 to 32 MHz). Backscattered radiofrequency (RF) data were acquired from tumors subjected to treatment. Ultrasound parameters such as average acoustic concentration (AAC) and average scatterer diameter (ASD), were estimated 24 hours prior and posttreatment. Additionally, texture features: contrast (CON), correlation (COR), energy (ENE), and homogeneity (HOM) were extracted from QUS parametric maps. All estimated parameters were compared with histopathological findings. The findings of our study demonstrated a significant increase in QUS parameters in both treatment conditions: HT alone (starting from 30 minutes of heat exposure) and combined treatment of HT plus USMB finally reaching a maximum at 50 minutes of heat exposure. Increase in AAC for 50 minutes HT alone and USMB +50 minutes was found to be 5.19 ± 0.417% and 5.91 ± 1.11%, respectively, compared to the control group with AAC value of 1.00 ± 0.44%. Furthermore, between the treatment groups, ΔASD-ENE values for USMB +30 minutes HT significantly reduced, depicting 0.00062 ± 0.00096% compared to 30 minutes HT only group, showing 0.0058 ± 0.0013%. Further, results obtained from the histological analysis indicated greater cell death and reduced nucleus size in both HT alone and HT combined with USMB. The texture-based QUS parameters indicated a correlation with microstructural changes obtained from histological data. This work demonstrated the use of QUS to detect HT treatment effects in breast cancer tumors in vivo.

Ultrasound-Induced Tumor Perfusion Changes and Doxorubicin Delivery: A Study on Pulse Length and Pulse Repetition Frequency.

To investigate the appropriate combination of pulse length (PL) and pulse repetition frequency (PRF) when performing ultrasound stimulated microbubble (USMB) to enhance doxorubicin (DOX) delivery to tumors. A total of 48 tumor-bearing mice were divided into four groups, namely groups A-D. The mice in groups B-D were treated with chemotherapy and USMB treatment with different combinations of PL and PRF, and group A was control. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging was conducted to analyze tumor blood perfusion. Fluorescence microscopy and high-performance liquid chromatography were used to qualitatively and quantitatively analyse DOX release. The structural changes of tumors were observed under light microscope and transmission electron microscope. Furthermore, another 24 tumor-bearing mice were treated with sonochemotherapy and some related inflammatory factors were measured to explore the underlying mechanism. With PL of three cycles and PRF of 2 kHz, the tumor perfusion area ratio increased by 26.67%, and the DOX concentration was 4.69 times higher than the control (P < .001). With PL of 34.5 cycles and PRF of 200 Hz, the tumor perfusion area ratio decreased by 12.7% and DOX did not exhibit increased extravasation compared with the control. Microvascular rupture and hemorrhage were observed after long PL and low PRF treatment. While vasodilation and higher levels of some vasodilator inflammatory factors were found after treatment with short PL and high PRF. USMB treatment using short PL and high PRF could enhance tumor blood perfusion and increase DOX delivery, whereas long PL and low PRF could not serve the same purpose.

A Novel Strategy to Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy: Results from the Prospective Phase I Clinical Trial of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles (MRgFUS+MB) Treatment for Breast Cancer

Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that tumor cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy (RT) is combined with focused-ultrasound (FUS)-stimulated microbubbles (MB) treatment. MBs are gas microspheres used as intravascular contrast agents. The acoustic exposure of MBs within the target volume causes bubbles cavitation that induces perturbation of tumor vasculature. This activates apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy, which would otherwise require high-dose radiotherapy (>8-10 Gy/fraction) to be activated. Subsequent irradiation of an MB-sensitized tumor causes increased anoxic tumor killing, which occurs in addition to canonical RT-induced DNA damage. Given the compelling results of preclinical data, we conducted a phase I clinical trial of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-stimulated MBs (MRgFUS+MB) treatment for breast cancer patients (pts). We report the safety and efficacy results of this new radio enhancement treatment. This is a single-center, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04431674). We included pts with stage I-IV breast cancer with tumor in situ for whom breast or chest wall RT was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team. Pts were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or MB administration. Pts underwent 2-3 MRgFUS+MB treatments throughout the RT course. We used an MR-coupled FUS-device operating at 500 KHz and 540 kPa peak negative pressure to deliver the treatment. The FUS sonicated intravenously administrated MB within the MR-guided target volume. Pts were monitored for 30-min post-procedure and subsequently treated with RT. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology for Adverse Events V5.0. Secondary outcomes were radiological response at 3 months and local control (LC) at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control. All pts signed a written consent form before study participation. We enrolled 18 females with 20 primary breast cancer treated with MRgFUS+MB therapy. The median age was 60 years (range, 44-90). The molecular subtypes consisted of basal-like (n = 3/20), luminal (n = 11/20), and HER2-enriched (n = 6/20). The prescribed dose was 20 Gy/5 fractions (n = 8/20), 30-35 Gy/5 fractions (n = 7/20), 30-40 Gy/10 fractions (n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3-29). All pts completed the planned MRgFUS+MB treatments. The only MRgFUS+MB treatment-related toxicity consisted of Grade 1 allergic reaction (mild cough) 30 minutes after the last MB injection. All worst acute toxicities were radiation dermatitis (Grade 3 = 2/20, Grade 2 = 2/20, Grade 1 = 14/20). At 3 months, 75% had partial (n = 6/20) or complete (n = 9/20) response, with a single progression. The LC rate at 1 year was 86%. MRgFUS+MB was a safe and efficient treatment that provided durable responses.

76 a Novel Strategy to Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy: Results from the Prospective Phase I Clinical Trial of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles (MRgFUS+MB) Treatment for Breast Cancer

76 a Novel Strategy to Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy: Results from the Prospective Phase I Clinical Trial of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles (MRgFUS+MB) Treatment for Breast Cancer

A Novel Strategy to Improve Radiotherapy Effectiveness: First-in-Human MR-guided Focused Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles (MRgFUS+MB) Radiation Enhancement Treatment

Background and aim: Preclinical in vitro and in vivo experiments suggest that radiation-induced tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when combined with focused-ultrasound (FUS)-stimulated microbubbles (MB). The acoustic exposure of MB in the tumour volume causes vasculature perturbation, activation of the acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) ceramide pathway, and resultant endothelial cell apoptosis. When the tumour is subsequently treated with radiation, there is increased endothelial cell death and anoxic tumour killing. Here we describe a first-in-human experience treating patients with magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-stimulated MB (MRgFUS+MB) radiation enhancement. Case presentation: A head and neck cancer patient with recurrent disease underwent radiotherapy for 5 separate sites of locoregional disease followed by systemic therapy. The first consisted of a course of 45 Gy in 5 fractions alone, the second of 30 Gy in 5 fractions with hyperthermia, and the three others of 20-30 Gy in 5 fractions along with MRgFUS+MB treatment. The treatment methodology used an MR-coupled FUS-device operating at 500 KHz and 540 kPa peak negative pressure with an insonification time of 750 ms spread over 5 minutes to stimulate intravenously administered MB within tumour target. All sites treated with stimulated MB had a complete radiological response, and subsequently, the patient’s other cutaneous metastatic disease disappeared. The patient has been under surveillance for over two years without active treatment or disease progression. Discussion: MRgFUS+MB was well-tolerated with no reported treatment-related adverse events, which can be attributed to the capability of FUS to selectively stimulate MB within the tumour volume while sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Sustained local control at all target sites aligns with earlier preclinical findings suggesting the radiation enhancement potential of FUS+MB. Conclusion: MRgFUS+MB represents a novel and promising therapy for enhancing radiation efficacy and improving therapeutic index with potential improvements in disease control.

In Vitro Radioenhancement Using Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles: A Comparison of Suspension and Adherent Cell States

Background: Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) have shown potential for enhancing radiation treatment via cavitation and sonoporation mechanisms. However, in vitro studies have produced inconsistent results, with adherent cells demonstrating no radioenhancement. This study aims to investigate the effect of cell adherence on in vitro radioenhancement using USMB and radiation. Method: Lung metastases of follicular thyroid carcinoma cells (FTC-238) and non-small cell lung carcinoma cells (NCI-H727) were treated, both when adhered and in suspension, using 1.6% (v/v) Definity™ microbubbles, ~90 s of 2 MHz ultrasound with mechanical index 0.9, and either 3 Gy or 6 Gy of megavoltage (MV) X-rays. The cell viability was measured using an MTS assay 72 h post-treatment, and statistical analysis was conducted using a three-way analysis of variance. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed for cells treated when adherent compared to suspended. An additive effect was detected in NCI-H727 cells treated in suspension, but not while adherent, while no enhancement was observed for FTC-238 cells in either culture state. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to directly compare the effect of cell adherence on the radioenhancement potential of USMB in vitro, and the first to do so using a metastatic cell line.

Radiation combined with ultrasound and microbubbles: A potential novel strategy for cancer treatment

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Several emerging technologies are helping to battle cancer. Cancer therapies have been effective at killing cancer cells, but a large portion of patients still die to this disease every year. As such, more aggressive treatments of primary cancers are employed and have been shown to be capable of saving a greater number of lives. Recent research advances the field of cancer therapy by employing the use of physical methods to alter tumor biology. It uses microbubbles to enhance radiation effect by damaging tumor vasculature followed by tumor cell death. The technique can specifically target tumor volumes by conforming ultrasound fields capable of microbubbles stimulation and localizing it to avoid vascular damage in surrounding tissues. Thus, this new application of ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) can be utilized as a novel approach to cancer therapy by inducing vascular disruption resulting in tumor cell death. Using USMB alongside radiation has showed to augment the anti-vascular effect of radiation, resulting in enhanced tumor response. Recent work with nanobubbles has shown vascular permeation into intracellular space, extending the use of this new treatment method to potentially further improve the therapeutic effect of the ultrasound-based therapy. The significant enhancement of localized tumor cell kill means that radiation-based treatments can be made more potent with lower doses of radiation. This technique can manifest a greater impact on radiation oncology practice by increasing treatment effectiveness significantly while reducing normal tissue toxicity. This review article summarizes the past and recent advances in USMB enhancement of radiation treatments. The review mainly focuses on preclinical findings but also highlights some clinical findings that use USMB as a therapeutic modality in cancer therapy.

Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles enhancement of fractionated radiation for tumor treatment.

Radiation therapy (XRT) causes numerous biological changes in tumor microenvironment. Radiation vascular response, due to endothelial disruption, can influence treatment outcomes in a dose-dependent manner. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) have also been demonstrated to create a vascular response in the tumor microenvironment and enhance tumor response when used in combination with XRT. Single doses of 8-10Gy are known to induce activation of acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase)-induced ceramide production, causing vascular damage. Destruction of vasculature results in endothelial apoptosis followed by tumor cell death. The effect of tumor response is known to be synergistic by 10-fold higher cell kill observed when USMB is combined with radiation. In this study, we used an USMB approach in combination with conventional low dose fractionated radiation to enhance endothelial cell responses to XRT in human PC3 prostate cancer xenograft model. Mice were divided into untreated, USMB therapy, fractionated XRT, and combined USMB therapy followed by XRT (USMB + XRT) groups. USMB therapy was delivered twice per week in the USMB-alone and combined USMB + XRT treatment groups over four weeks. Radiation treatments were delivered in fractions of 2Gy/day (total 40Gy in 20 fractions, BED10 = 48Gy) in the XRT-alone and combined USMB + XRT groups. The treatment outcome was evaluated using histopathology, power Doppler, and immunohistochemistry assays. Tumor growth assessment showed that sizes of tumors increased in the control and the single treatment groups over a treatment period of four weeks, but significantly decreased with the combined treatments of USMB + XRT. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated a statistically significant vascular disruption in mice that received treatment involving a full 4-week schedule of combined (USMB + XRT) treatments. A statistically significant increase in vascular disruption was demonstrated through CD68 and trichrome fibrosis staining. Changes in local perfusion assessed using high-frequency power Doppler imaging demonstrated attenuated blood flow in the combined group. This work demonstrates the efficacy of using USMB as a radiation sensitizer in a mouse model of human PC3 tumor xenograft. This radiation treatment enhancement modality has the advantage of targeting tumor vasculature with ultrasound stimulation that can be implemented prior to radiation treatment.