Ultrasound-guided Interscalene Block Research Articles

Comparison of the analgesic effects of infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block and interscalene block under ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Objective: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block and interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Methods: A total of 74 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University from December 2023 to February 2024 were prospectively included, whose age ranged from 18 to 80 years and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅲ. Patients were divided into two groups using block randomization: infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block group (observation group) and interscalene block group (control group), with 37 cases in each group. In the anesthesia preparation room, all patients received nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all patients following surgery. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain within 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included the highest NRS score within 48 hours postoperatively, the amount of sufentanil used via PCIA within 48 hours postoperatively, the incidence of rescue analgesia and rebound pain, QoR-40 scores, and the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours. The non-inferiority margin for the AUC of NRS scores between the two types of regional nerve blocks was set at "2.6". Results: A total of 35 patients were included in the observation group [17 males, 18 females, aged (58.1±9.1) years], and 36 patients were included in the control group [12 males, 24 females, aged (57.0±9.8) years]. The AUC of the NRS scores at rest within 24 hours post-operation was 51.7±10.9 in the observation group and 62.6±13.6 in the control group. The difference in AUC between the two groups was -10.9 (95%CI:-16.8--5.1), with the upper limit of the 95%CI falling below the predefined non-inferiority margin of "2.6" (non-inferiority P<0.001). The highest NRS score [M (Q1, Q3)] within 48 hours post-surgery was 3 (3, 4) in the control group, which was significantly higher than the observation group's score of 2 (2, 3) (P<0.001). During the postoperative period of 0-12 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly higher than the control group's dose of 8 (6, 10) μg (P<0.001). During the postoperative period of 12-24 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 8 (8, 10) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly lower than the control group's median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg (P<0.001). During the postoperative period of 24-48 hours, there was no statistically significant difference in the dose of sufentanil between the two groups of patients (P=0.548). In the observation group, the incidence of rescue analgesia within 48 hours postoperatively was 0 (0/35), which was lower than that of the control group at 22.2% (8/36) (P=0.010). The occurrence of rebound pain in the observation group was 0 (0/35), and the control group was 11.1% (4/36), no statistically significant difference was found between two groups (P=0.130). In the observation group, the QoR-40 score within 24 hours post-operation was 180.2±3.2, which was higher than the control group's score of 175.8±4.7 (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours between the two groups (P=0.372). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block demonstrates a comparable analgesic effect to interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery within the first 24 hours postoperatively.

A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Background &amp; Objectives: Arthroscopic surgery is a preferred approach for shoulder surgeries due to its documented advantages of early postoperative recovery. However, postoperative pain remains a concern for which different techniques are used. Interscalene block (ISB), using dexmedetomidine (DXM) or dexamethasone (DXA) as adjuvants to local anesthetics (LA), is a common analgesic method. We conducted this comparative study to establish if any one of the adjuvants is better in terms of postoperative analgesia. Methodology: Patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were assigned randomly to three groups: Group A (LA alone), Group B (ISB with DXM), and Group C (ISB with DXA). Assessment of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, time to first rescue analgesic, and rescue analgesic (ketorolac) consumption were recorded. Results: Intraoperative and postoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure showed no significant differences among the three groups, suggesting comparable hemodynamic control. VAS pain scores were equivalent at 1, 2 and 6 h postoperatively, but at 12, 18 and 24 h, Groups B and C demonstrated significantly lower scores compared to Group A (P &lt; 0.001). Time to first rescue analgesic was prolonged in Groups B and C, indicating improved and longer-lasting analgesia. Groups B and C consumed considerably less ketorolac overall than Group A (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: While all three groups exhibited equivalent intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic control, the addition of dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to local anesthetics for interscalene block prolonged postoperative analgesia, reduced pain scores at 12, 18 and 24 h, delayed time to first rescue, and decreased total analgesic consumption. Both adjuvants showed advantages over local anesthetics alone, emphasizing their potential in multimodal analgesia for shoulder arthroscopy. Abbreviations: ISB - Interscalene block; DXM - Dexmedetomidine; DXA - Dexamethasone; HR – Heart Rate; MAP – Mean Arterial Pressure; VAS Visual Analog Scale. Trial registry: PACTR202210507488378 Keywords: Analgesia; Analgesia, postoperative; Dexmedetomidine; Dexamethasone; Interscalene block; Pain, postoperative; Shoulder arthroscopy Citation: Nashaat P, Mohamed O, George S, Mohammed A, Samy E. A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(5):850−858; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i5.2566 Received: June 13, 2024; Reviewed: June 20, 2024; Accepted: July 18, 2024

Diaphragm-sparing efficacy of subparaneural upper trunk block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Inter-scalene block (ISB) is associated with an inevitable risk of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (HDP). To reduce the risk of HDP, an upper trunk block (UTB) has been proposed at the brachial plexus division level. We hypothesised that UTB would be associated with a lower incidence of HDP than ISB while providing sufficient analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Randomised controlled trial. A tertiary teaching hospital. Seventy patients aged 20 to 80 years undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Ultrasound-guided ISB or UTB was performed with 5 ml 0.75% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the incidence of complete HDP, assessed by diaphragm excursion using ultrasound, defined as a decrease to 25% or less of baseline or occurrence of paradoxical movement. Postoperative pulmonary function change, pain scores, opioid consumption and pain-related outcomes were the secondary outcomes. The UTB group had a significantly lower incidence of complete HDP than the ISB group [5.9% (2/34) vs. 41.7% (15/36); absolute difference, 35.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 17.8 to 53.7%; P < 0.001]. The postblockade decline in pulmonary function was more pronounced in the ISB group than that in the UTB group. The pain score at 1 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups (ISB vs. UTB group: median 0 vs. 1; median difference, -1; 95% CI, -2 to 0.5). No significant difference was observed in any other secondary outcomes. UTB was associated with a lower incidence of HDP compared with ISB while providing excellent analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ) identifier: KCT0007002. Chungnam National University Hospital Institutional Review Board No. 2021-12-069.

Comparison of analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block with liposomal bupivacaine after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Objective: To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A total of 40 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from October to November 2023 were prospectively included, whose American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅱ. They were divided into modified superior trunk block group (group S) and interscalene brachial plexus block group (group I) by random number table according to different nerve block methods, with 20 cases in each group. Local anesthetics was a mixture of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride injection in equal volume. Patients in group S were injected 5 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided modified superior trunk block, and patients in group I were injected with 15 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided traditional interscalene block respectively. Both groups underwent superficial cervical plexus block (5 ml mixture). Standardized general anesthesia and standardized postoperative analgesia were followed. The primary outcome measures included 48 h resting numerical rating scale (NRS) scores after surgery and the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) at 30 min after block. The secondary outcome measures included resting NRS scores during the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), 12, 24, and 36 h after surgery, postoperative opioid consumption and satisfaction with analgesia, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration, and the incidence of perioperative adverse reactions. The non-inferiority cut-off value of resting NRS scores for patients in group S was set as"1 point"at each observation time point after surgery. Results: In group S, one patient was excluded because the target nerve was blocked by the subclavian vein and could not be blocked, nineteen patients [11 males and 8 females, aged (52.2±9.0) years] were eventually included. In group I, there were 7 males and 13 females, aged (55.0±5.1) years. Resting NRS scores of group S and Group I at 48 h after surgery were 0 (0, 0) and 0 (0, 0.8) point, respectively, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). The median difference was 0 (95%CI:0-0) point and the upper 95%CI was 0 point, which was lower than the preset non-inferiority cut-off value"1 point"(non-inferiority P<0.001). The incidence of HDP in group S and group I were 5% (1/19) and 75% (15/20), respectively, with statistically significant (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in resting NRS scores at PACU and 12, 24, 36 h after surgery, opioid dosage, satisfaction with analgesia, SpO2 at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration between two groups (all P>0.05). No respiratory adverse events such as hypoxemia and airway spasm occurred in two groups after extubation. One patient in group I showed symptoms of breath shortness when entering PACU, and 3 patients felt uncomfortable due to prolonged numbness and weakness of the blockade limb (>2 days). No nerve block procedures and opioid drugs relative adverse reactions and no neurological complications happened in both groups. Conclusion: Liposomal bupivacaine usage for modified superior trunk block can provide long-term postoperative analgesic effects which is noninferior to traditional interscalene brachial plexus block and causes less HDP in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

“Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block combined with intra-articular injection of bupivacaine versus ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy”

“Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block combined with intra-articular injection of bupivacaine versus ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy”

A prospective randomized comparative study of analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene block

Abstract Background: Ultrasound (USG)-guided interscalene block (ISB) provides excellent anesthesia and analgesia for humerus surgery. Various adjuvants have been used to improve the quality of block and duration of analgesia. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DXM) and dexamethasone (DXA) as an adjuvant to 0.75% ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block among patients undergoing humerus surgery. Settings and Design: The study design was a prospective randomized comparative study at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: After ethical approval and CTRI registration, 52 patients of 18–60 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiology Grade I–II, scheduled for proximal and mid-shaft humerus surgery were randomly allocated in Groups A and B. Group A (n=26) received Ropivacaine 0.75% (20 ml) along with DXM 0.5 µg/ Kg and 2 ml saline (total 22 ml) and Group B (n=26) received Ropivacaine 075% along with DXA 8 mg (total 22 ml). ISB was performed with an in-plane technique using a linear probe. Duration of analgesia, block characteristics (onset, complete sensory, and motor block), and complications were recorded and compared for 24 h. Statistical Analysis: Data were statistically analyzed with Social Science Statistics. Student’s unpaired t-test and Chi-square tests were used, and all statistical tests were examined with P ≤ 0.05 level of significance. Results: The duration of analgesia in Group B was significantly longer than Group A (13 h 12 min ± 2 h 33 min–8 h 48 min ± 1 h 52 min, P &lt; 0.00001). The groups were comparable regarding block characteristics, baseline demographics, and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters. Conclusion: DXA as an adjuvant to ropivacaine provides analgesia for longer duration compared to DXM in USG-guided ISB.

Anaesthetic Management of a Patient with Guillain-Barré Syndrome undergoing Proximal Humerus Fracture Surgery: A Case Report

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an autoimmune disorder which can present in acute and chronic forms. It is an inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. These patients pose potential perioperative risks of autonomic dysfunction and respiratory muscle weakness. The current case report shows a 66-year-old female with a history of a fall at home eight days prior to surgery, diagnosed with a right-sided proximal humerus fracture. The patient was a diagnosed case of GBS and hypertension since five years. For GBS, she had a history of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission for both upper and lower limb muscle weakness and breathlessness. She recovered with treatment of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIg) and oxygen therapy. The weakness improved gradually over time but did not fully recover. The patient continued to have weakness in both lower and upper limbs prior to surgery. The patient underwent Joshi’s External Stabilising System (JESS) fixation surgery for the right proximal humerus fracture. Ultrasound-guided (USG) interscalene and superficial cervical plexus block were performed in view of pre-existing muscle weakness and to reduce the requirement of postoperative ventilator support. The intraoperative course was uneventful. The patient’s sensory and motor power returned to the same prior to surgery after the block’s effects subsided.

The effect of block side on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters in patients who had interscalene block for upper limb surgery.

The administration of interscalene block (ISB) may lead to several hemodynamic effects, likely due to the diffusion of local anesthetic to nearby structures such as carotid sinus baroreceptors. This study aimed to compare hemodynamic and respiratory changes resulting from right and left-sided ISB. A retrospective analysis was conducted on adults who had ultrasound-guided ISB for upper limb surgery between January 2020 and December 2021. All patients had ISB with bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% mixture following premedication. Demographic data, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured before and after the block at regular intervals. Block characteristics, surgical and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) durations, intraoperative analgesic requirements, and side effects were analyzed. A total of 94 patients had ISB for upper limb surgery, 54 for the right and 40 for the left-sided surgeries. Patients' data were analyzed in two groups according to the block side. Increased arterial blood pressure was observed in both groups after the block compared to the control values. Systolic arterial pressure from 10 to 30 minutes, diastolic arterial pressure at the 25th minute, and mean arterial pressure at the 15th, 20th, and 25th minutes were significantly higher on the right-sided blocks. Heart rate, SpO2, analgesic requirements, block characteristics, and PACU durations did not differ between the groups. Ultrasound-guided ISB-applied patients demonstrated increased blood pressure compared to control values. This increase, without concurrent changes in heart rate, was more pronounced in right-sided ISB. These findings indicate that careful hemodynamic monitoring is necessary whenever hypertension should be avoided for the patients.

Postoperative neurological symptoms following arthroscopic shoulder surgery with interscalene block: an exploratory secondary analysis of pooled randomized controlled trial data

ObjectivePostoperative neurological symptoms (PONS) are recognized complications of regional anesthesia and orthopedic surgery. We aimed to better characterize prevalence and potential risk factors in a homogeneous population of randomized, controlled...

Cost Analysis of Low-Volume Versus Standard-Volume Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.

Background Economic evaluation has become an essential decision-making tool for health systems worldwide. This study was aimed at estimating the difference in the use of healthcare resources, days on sick leave, and costs between patients undergoing a standard-volume versus a low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Methods This is a post-hoc cost analysis of a double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Forty-eight patients undergoing ultrasound-guided interscalene block received either 10 ml or 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Analyses involved the public healthcare payer perspective (including visits to general practitioners, nursing staff, physiotherapy facilities, hospital admissions, outpatient diagnostic tests, etc.) and the limited societal perspective, including productivity losses (days on sick leave). Measurements were made at one-month and one-year follow-ups post-intervention. Differences in costs were estimated using two-part models adjusted by the costs incurred in the previous year. Results Subjects in the 10 ml group made greater use of general practitioner visits (mean difference [95% CI]: 3.35 [0.219 to 6.49]; p=0.036) and diagnostic tests (2.43 [0.601 to 4.26]; p=0.009), but less use of physical therapy (-12.9 [-21.7 to -4.06]; p=0.004). Mean (SD) cost differences from the public healthcare payer's perspective were 1,461.34 $ (1,541.62) and 1,024.08$ (943.83) for the 10 ml and 20 ml groups, respectively (p=0.293). From the limited societal perspective, the differences were as follows: 7,036.53$ (8,077.58) and 8,666.56$ (9,841.10), respectively (p=0.937). While there were no differences in the above parameters at the one-month follow-up. Conclusion The volume reduction proposed following interscalene block resulted in meaningful, albeit not statistically significant, clinical benefits and lower costs from a limited societal perspective for shoulder surgery. Thus, healthcare use and days on sick leave are variables to be taken into consideration when calculating the economic impact of surgical procedures.

Evaluation of perfusion index as an objective indicator of successful interscalene block

Background: Interscalene nerve blocks are commonly performed for surgeries of the upper limb. Assessment methods for evaluation of blocks are conventional and subjective. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate perfusion index (PI) as an objective indicator for assessing successful ultrasound guided interscalene block. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study included adult patients undergoing upper limb surgery (humerus and shoulder) under USG guided interscalene nerve block. PI was recorded at baseline (before LA administration), at every 2 min till 10 min, and then every 5 min till 30 min after the block in both the arms. The PI values were compared between the blocked and unblocked arms at all observed time points. PI ratio was calculated as the ratio between PI at 15 min after block and the baseline PI. Results: The PI increased significantly in the blocked limb after local anesthetic injection and there was a statistically significant difference in PI values between the blocked and unblocked arms at all-time points. Both PI and PI ratio at 15 min after injection showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for block success at cutoff values of 3.2 and 2.04, respectively. Conclusion: PI maybe used as an objective indicator of successful interscalene nerve block. PI &gt;3.2 and PI ratio &gt;2.04 at 15 min are accurate predictors for block success.

Opioid-Sparing Analgesic Effects from Interscalene Block Impact Anesthetic Management During Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block (UISB) is commonly used to alleviate postoperative pain during shoulder arthroscopy. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative advantages and analgesic effects of preoperative UISB. In this retrospective observational study, a total of 170 patients underwent shoulder arthroscopy at a tertiary medical center in southern Taiwan throughout 2019. After applying the exclusion criteria, 142 of these cases were included, with 74 and 68 in the UISB group and control groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the evaluation of intraoperative morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption. Secondary outcomes were sevoflurane consumption, the use of intraoperative antihypertensive drugs, and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and in the ward at 24 h after surgery. Preoperative UISB effectively reduced opioids and volatile gases during surgery, supported by a 48.1% and 14.8% reduction in the median intraoperative MME and sevoflurane concentrations, respectively, and showed less need for antihypertensive drugs. The preoperative UISB group also showed significantly better performance on the VAS in both the PACU and ward. Taken together, the preoperative UISB reduced not only intraoperative MME and sevoflurane consumption but also had satisfactory VAS scores in both the PACU and ward without any symptomatic respiratory complications. In summary, preoperative UISB is a reliable adjuvant analgesic technique and a key factor in achieving opioid-sparing and sevoflurane-sparing anesthesia and multimodal analgesia during shoulder arthroscopy.

Comparison between analgesic effect of ultrasound guided interscalene block versus shoulder block versus suprascapular nerve block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Background: Shoulder arthroscopy is associated with severe post-operative pain, which causes significant discomfort to the patient, interfering with recovery and rehabilitation. The aim of this work was to compare efficacy of intra and post operative analgesia of inter-scalene block (ISB), shoulder block (SHB) and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) for shoulder arthroscopic surgeries. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled double blinded research was carried out on 90 cases, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, admitted for shoulder arthroscopy under general anesthesia (GA). Cases were equally randomized to: Group I: underwent ISB by 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5%, group II: underwent SHB by 10 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5% was injected below the supraspinatus (SS) fascia and another 10 ml was injected at axillary nerve and group III: underwent SSNB by 10 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5%. All blocks were ultrasound guided, before induction of GA.Results: Visual Analogue Scale at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hr, number of cases required rescue analgesia and required fentanyl intraoperatively and intraoperative fentanyl consumption and postoperative meperidine consumption were significantly higher in SSNB versus groups ISB and SHB (P value < 0.05) and was insignificantly different between ISB and SHB. Time to first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly earlier in SSNB versus groups ISB and SHB (p<0.001) and was insignificantly different between ISB and SHB. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were significantly higher in SSNB versus groups ISB and SHB (P= 0.031), hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis and Horner syndrome were significantly higher in ISB versus groups SHB and SSNB (p<0.001).Conclusions: Both SHB and ISB blocks have similar efficacy in hemodynamic stability, analgesia, incidence PONV and cases’ satisfaction. SSNB group showed inferior results in these parameters versus both SHB and ISB. However, ISB was associated with more complications versus groups SHB and SSNB.

Comparative study between the effect of ultrasound Guided interscalene block versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery

Comparative study between the effect of ultrasound Guided interscalene block versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery

Efficacy of surgeon-directed suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks in shoulder arthroscopy: a 3-arm prospective randomized controlled trial

The use of regional anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy improves perioperative pain control, thereby reducing the need for opioids and their recognized side effects. Occasionally one type of block is not suitable for a patient's anatomy or comorbidities or requires a specially trained anesthetist to safely perform. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of 3 different nerve blocks for pain management in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. A 3-arm, blinded, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective, unilateral shoulder arthroscopic procedures between August 2018 and November 2020 was conducted at a single center. One hundred and thirty participants were randomized into 1 of 3 regional anesthesia techniques. The first group received an ultrasound-guided interscalene block performed by an anesthetist (US+ISB). The second group received an ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block and an axillary nerve block by an anesthetist (US+SSANB). The final group received a suprascapular nerve block without ultrasound and an axillary nerve block under arthroscopic guidance by an orthopedic surgeon (A+SSANB). Intraoperative pain response, analgesia requirements, and side effects were recorded. Visual analogue pain scores and opioid doses were recorded in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and daily for 8 days following the procedure. Twelve patients withdrew from the study after randomization, leaving 39 participants in US+ISB, 40 in US+SSANB, and 39 in A+SSANB. The US+ISB group required significantly lower intraoperative opioid doses than US+SSANB and A+SSANB (P<.001) and postoperatively in PACU (P<.001). After discharge from hospital, there were no differences between all groups in daily analgesia requirements (P=.063). There was significantly more nerve complications with 6 patient-reported complications in the US+ISB group (P=.02). There were no reported differences in satisfaction rates between groups (P=.41); however, the A+SSANB group was more likely to report a wish to not have a regional anesthetic again (P=.04). The US+ISB group required lower opioid doses perioperatively; however, there was no difference between groups after discharge from PACU. The analgesia requirements between the US+ SSANB and A+ SSANB were similar intraoperatively and postoperatively. A surgeon-administered SSANB may be a viable alternative when an experienced regional anesthetist is not available.

Surgeon-administered intraoperative brachial plexus block for open shoulder surgery - a novel and safe technique.

In the era of outpatient shoulder surgery, bundled payment, safe, predictable, and time-efficient pain management strategies for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) are important. Ultrasound-guided interscalene blocks (ISBs), currently the gold standard for postoperative pain management after shoulder surgery, can be highly operator dependent, time-consuming, and not without complications. We developed a new surgical technique of surgeon-administered intraoperative brachial plexus block in patients undergoing SA open shoulder surgery using the deltopectoral approach. This procedure could be performed after the exposure, either at the beginning or end of the bony work. This procedure is simple, safe, and effective. We did not notice any complications that are typically seen with ISB-like respiratory depression secondary to phrenic nerve palsy, rebound pain after the block wore off, and pain related conversion of outpatient SA to inpatient, over the period of four years (2018-2022). This technique has additional advantages over the established "gold standard" ISB in terms of time and cost savings and improved operating room efficiency.

EFFECT OF DEXAMETHASONE AS AN ADJUVANT TO BUPIVACAINE IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED INTERSCALENE BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK IN UPPER ARM SURGERIES

Background:Ultrasound (US) in regional anaesthesia offers a new standard in nerve location and identification, allows real-time imaging of nerves and direct needle guidance.In present study we have access efficacy and safety of Dexamethasone as adjuvant to US guided Interscalene block for Upper arm surgeries. Aims:The study was conducted to compare the efficacy of Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine in ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block to provide intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing upper arm surgeries and to evaluate Hemodynamic Stability Methods:Present study was conducted at tertiary care hospital on 60 patients posted for elective upper arm surgeries, with ASA grade I and II, in age group of 18-70 years. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups – Group A and Group B. All patients were given ultrasound guided interscalene block with 15 ml of 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine. Inj. Dexamethasone 8mg was added to local anaesthetic drug in Group A and 0.9% normal saline 2ml was added in Group B. All patients received 17 ml of volume of study drug perineurally. All blocks were successful to provide surgical anaesthesia and analgesia.Both the groups were evaluated for onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia, perioperative haemodynamic stability, total number of analgesic requests in 24 hours and any adverse reactions/complications. Results: Both the groups were comparable with respect to patient characteristics. In our study, Onset of sensory block was faster in Group A (3.866 ± 1.33 mins)compared to Group B (7.566 ± 1.67 mins) (p value &lt;0.0001). Onset of motor block was faster in Group A (7.933mins) compared to Group B (11.733 mins) (p &lt;0.0001). Duration of mean sensory block was longer in Group A (904 mins) compared to Group B (305.33mins)(p&lt;0.0001).Duration of mean motor block was longer in Group A (861 mins) compared to Group B (264.33mins) (p&lt; 0.0001). Mean Duration of analgesia was longer in Group A (1455.86 mins)compared to Group B (806.16 mins) (p&lt;0.0001). Total number of analgesic requests was less in Group A (1.2 ) compared to Group B (2.37 ) (p &lt;0.0001).Both groups showed perioperative haemodynamic stability. And no adverse reactions or complications were observed in any patient in Group A, whereas 2 patients (6.67%) in Group B had Postoperative Nausea Vomiting.

Evaluation of Magnesium as an Adjuvant in Ropivacaine Induced Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Interscalene block is a commonly performed procedure for surgery of shoulder and upper arm, however very few studies have studied the effect of magnesium sulphate when added in interscalene block.&#x0D; Aims: The primary aim was to compare block characteristics along with postoperative analgesia and the secondary aim was to study the side effect profile and postoperative analgesic requirements.&#x0D; Methods: We randomly recruited 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II patients, undergoing surgeries of the shoulder to receive ultrasound-guided interscalene block with 1 mL normal saline or 150 mg Magnesium sulphate added to 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine.&#x0D; Statistical analysis used: Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 21.0) was used for analysing the data. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact probability test were used for categorical variables; while the continuous variables were compared by unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.&#x0D; Results: With the addition of magnesium sulphate, onset of sensory (10.03 ± 1.03 vs 12.73 ± 1.14 min) and motor block (15.17 ± 2.02 min vs 17.87 ± 1.41) was hastened. The duration (sensory 528.00 ± 14.98 min vs 376.83 ± 13.16 min, motor 429.83 ± 11.57 min vs 319.97 ± 6.800 min) and postoperative analgesia (527.77 ± 21.96 min vs 402.97 ± 12.83 min) (p &lt; 0.001) were all prolonged by magnesium sulphate, with resultant decrease in requirement of postoperative analgesic dosage.&#x0D; Conclusion: Magnesium when added to local anaesthetics in interscalene block, effectively improves all characteristics of block and provides better postoperative analgesia.

Ultrasound-guided interscalene block versus intravenous analgesia and sedation for reduction of first anterior shoulder dislocation

PurposeThis study aims to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene block (US-ISB) with that of intravenous analgesia and sedation (IVAS) in reducing first shoulder dislocation. Material and methodsA prospective study was performed in 66 patients with first anterior shoulder dislocation in emergency department. The patients were divided into a US-ISB (n = 32) group and an IVAS (IVAS n = 34) group. The procedure time (anesthesia, reduction, and hospital times), pain score (before, during, and after reduction), reduction attempts, complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe anesthesia time (P < 0.01) and reduction time (P < 0.01) were shorter and the hospital time (P < 0.01) was longer in the IVAS group than in the US-ISB group. No significant differences in preoperative (P = 0.18) and postoperative (P = 0.27) pain scores were found between the two groups, but the intraoperative score of the US-ISB group was significantly higher than that of the IVAS group. More reduction attempts (P < 0.01) were recorded in the US-ISB group than that in the IVAS group. Complications (P < 0.01) such as nausea, vomiting, headache, and hypoxia occurred more frequently in the IVAS group than in the US-ISB group. No significant difference in patient satisfaction was observed between two groups (P = 0.96). ConclusionCompared with IVAS group, US-ISB group reduces the time to discharge and achieves lesser complication. The pain score and reduction attempt are lower in the IVAS group than in the US-ISB group.

Abstract No. : ABS1071: Comparison of three different volumes of local anaesthetics in incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis in ultrasound-guided interscalane brachial plexus block -A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims:The incidence of diaphragmatic palsy following Interscalene brachial plexus block(IBPB) is almost 100% where the drug volume plays an indispensable role. This study compared the incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis and success rate following IBPB using three different volumes of local anaesthetics(LA).Methods:Ninety patients undergoing shoulder and arm surgeries under IBPB using ultrasound were randomly allocated into three groups based on volume of LA: Group A(10ml), group B(15ml), and group C(20ml). The drug administered was 0.75% ropivacaine with 50 µg dexmedetomidine under ultrasound guidance. Diaphragm excursion was measured before and 30 minutes after the block on the side of surgery. The incidence of diaphragmatic palsy and its degree were noted. The success rate following block, the onset of sensory blockade, duration of postoperative analgesia and, adverse effects were observed in all three groups.Results:The demographic data, duration of surgery and success rate following block were statistically insignificant. Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (<25%,25-75%,>75%) in group A(29,1,0), group B(17,13,0), and group C(15,8,7) was statistically significant (P-value<0.001)(figure 1). The difference in onset of sensory blockade in group A(7.06±0.73min), group B(6.23±0.72min) and group C(4.61±0.63min) was statistically significant with a P-value<0.001. The duration of postoperative analgesia in group A(440±48.42min) group B(429±44.48min), and group C(411±51.37min), was comparable (Pvalue-0.0719). Five patients in group C developed hoarseness of voice postoperatively which was managed conservatively.Figure 1Comparison of diaphragmatic paresis in the three groupsConclusion:Lower LA volumes in ultrasound guided interscalene block is associated with lower incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis with a similar success rate and duration of postoperative analgesia. Higher volume of drug yields faster onset of the sensory blockade.