Ultrabrief Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy Research Articles

Seizure EEG Quality in Right Unilateral Ultrabrief ECT.

The aims of this study were to compare threshold and suprathreshold ictal electroencephalograms (EEGs) in right unilateral (RUL) ultrabrief (UB) electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and to identify the differences between these EEGs. This study is a retrospective review of 125 pairs EEGs from titration and subsequent sessions across a 2-year period. All EEGs were independently rated for by 2 assessors using a scale based on qualities of an EEG used to guide ECT treatment dose adequacy, for example, midictal amplitude, regularity, interhemispheric coherence, seizure end point, and postictal suppression. The scores of threshold and suprathreshold EEGs were compared within and between groups based on 2 ECT types, that is, RUL UB ECT and RUL brief pulse (BP) ECT. Paired t tests showed a statistically significant difference in between threshold and suprathreshold EEG scores in RUL UB ECT. There were no statistically significant differences between corresponding scores for RUL UB ECT and RUL BP ECT threshold and suprathreshold EEGs. There is a significant difference between the quality of threshold and suprathreshold EEGs in RUL UB ECT when measured with an EEG rating scale. Visual rating of ictal EEGs is as reliable in discriminating between threshold and suprathreshold seizure in RUL UB ECT as it is in RUL BP ECT.

Ultrabrief Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy for the Treatment of the Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia with Lewy Bodies.

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a debilitating disorder associated with a number of distressing neuropsychiatric symptoms. There is currently limited guidance regarding the most effective strategies of managing these symptoms, and both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies are often used. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been reported as a potential nonpharmacologic method to alleviate some of these debilitating neuropsychiatric symptoms. However, there remains a paucity of evidence in current literature. This report aims to add to existing literature regarding ECT in DLB by highlighting successful treatment in seven cases. Our study is a retrospective case series of 7 patients with DLB who received treatment with ultrabrief (UB) right unilateral (RUL) ECT for the treatment of agitation and depressive symptoms. Participants included patients with a diagnosis of DLB who were admitted to Emory University Hospital at Wesley Woods from 2011 to 2020 presenting with agitation and/or depressive symptoms after failing pharmacologic intervention. Patients underwent UB RUL ECT administered by a board-certified psychiatrist. After treatment, Pittsburg Agitation Scale and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scales were recorded as measures of agitation and clinical improvement, respectively. All 7 patients responded to UB RUL ECT with marked improvement in their presenting symptoms of agitation and/or depression without significant adverse effects from treatment. Ultrabrief RUL ECT seems to be a safe and effective treatment of the agitative and depressive features of DLB.

Ultra-brief right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of late-life bipolar disorder

BackgroundBipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) accounts for 10-25% of all mood disorders in the geriatric population and 5% of all inpatient admissions to geropsychiatric units. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for all phases of BPAD, though only a few studies have focused on BPAD in the geriatric population. This study examines the safety and efficacy of ultra-brief right unilateral (UBRUL) ECT for patients with late-life bipolar depression (BD). MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with late-life BD who received UBRUL ECT treatments. Symptomatic response was measured using pre- and post-ECT Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) scores. Clinical improvement and cognitive change were measured using Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) and Electroconvulsive Cognitive Assessment (ECCA) scores. ResultsTwenty-Seven elderly patients (mean age 69.1 ± 7.7 years) were included in the analysis. Baseline QIDS-SR16 was 17.3 ± 5.3 and BDI-II 30.0 ± 9.2. 80.0% (16/20) and 57.1% (4/7) of patients achieved response (50.0% decline) in their QIDS-SR16 and BDI-II scores, respectively. Remission rates in QIDS-SR16 (post-ECT scores ≤5) and BDI-II (post-ECT scores ≤12) were 65.0% (13/20) and 42.9% (3/7), respectively. Mean QIDS-SR16 and BDI-II scores were reduced by a statistically significant 68.2% and 50.5%, respectively (two-tailed, paired p-values <0.01) after ECT. CGI-I of ≤2 was attained by 85.2% (23/27) of patients. 85.7% (12/14) of patients saw no change or improvement in ECCA scores. LimitationsInherent complications of chart review regarding quality, availability, and homogeny of data. ConclusionsUBRUL ECT is a safe and effective treatment for patients presenting with late-life BD.

Double-Blinded Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial Comparing Cognitive Side Effects of Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral ECT to 0.5 A Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST).

Background: Concerns over cognitive side effects (CSE) of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) still limit its broader usage for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The objectives of this study were to (1) examine the CSE of Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST) at 0.5 A compared to Ultra-brief Right Unilateral (UB-RUL) ECT using Time to Reorientation (TRO) as the main acute primary outcome, and (2) to compare effects on depressive symptoms between the two treatment groups. Methods: Participants were referred for ECT, consented for the study, and were randomized to a course of LAP-ST or standard UB-RUL ECT. TRO and depression were measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Results: Eleven patients consented. Of these, eight with a current major depressive episode (MDE) of unipolar or bipolar disorders were randomized. TRO was faster for the LAP-ST (mean = 6.8 min; SE = 4.9) than standard RUL ECT (mean = 15.5 min; SE = 6.5). Depression improved similarly in the two arms of the study from baseline (MADRS: LAP-ST = 41.0; SE = 2.0, RUL = 39.0; SE = 3.8) to endpoint (MADRS score: LAP-ST = 8.0; SE7.2, RUL = 9.5; SE = 3.8). Conclusions: This pilot, randomized and blinded clinical trial, suggests that the LAP-ST (at 0.5 A) has faster reorientation and possibly lower CSE compared to standard RUL-UB ECT. Caution is advised in interpreting these results due to the small sample size of this pilot study. Thus, future studies with similar design are warranted for replicating these findings.

Decreasing Treatment Duration of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Using Daily Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Instead of Bitemporal ECT.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for depression, but the standard 2 to 3 times weekly treatment course results in a total treatment duration of >2 weeks. We explored the viability of decreasing treatment duration by using daily right unilateral ultrabrief (RULUB) ECT instead of standard bitemporal (BT) ECT. This study involved a retrospective review of records of inpatients 18 to 64 years of age who were treated between 2012 and 2017 at a large tertiary ECT center. Lead placement/technique, treatment duration (days from first to last ECT), number of ECT treatments, and scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HamD-24) were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way analysis of variance and t tests. Of 214 patients, 112 started daily RULUB ECT (86 were completers and 26 were eventually switched to BT), and 83 started and completed BT ECT. Daily RULUB completers finished their course of ECT 6.5 days faster than those who received BT ECT (11.7 vs. 18.2 d, P<0.0001), while the number of ECT treatments did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (daily RULUB 8.6 treatments vs. BT 8.3 treatments, P=0.4402). There were no significant differences in the final PHQ-9 or HamD-24 depression scores between the 2 groups. One case of significant cognitive impairment was observed in the daily RULUB group. Daily RULUB ECT compared with BT ECT allowed depression to be treated faster and with similar efficacy. Randomized controlled trials, which include the use of formal cognitive and physical side effect measures, are needed to further explore the viability of daily RULUB ECT.

Ultrabrief Electroconvulsive Therapy for Mania: Data From 11 Acute Treatment Courses.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment of mania. Ultrabrief ECT is a novel modality that is associated with fewer cognitive adverse effects than the standard pulse width brief pulse ECT. It has been well studied in depression. However, its use in mania is not yet known. Following a retrospective chart view, we report a small sample of patients who had Right Unilateral Ultrabrief ECT (RUB-ECT) for mania. Eleven RUB-ECTs were identified for 9 patients; 72.8% remission rate was observed with RUB-ECT. Two patients required switch into bitemporal ECT in view of minimal clinical response and 1 patient to right unilateral brief pulse ECT because of poor seizure parameters. All patients achieved remission eventually. The possible mechanisms of ECT in mania and clinical implications of ultrabrief ECT are discussed.

An Open-Label, Pilot Study of Daily Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Pulse Electroconvulsive Therapy

Right unilateral ultrabrief (RUL-UB) pulse width electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has attracted much research attention recently due to its smaller effect on memory than is associated with other forms of ECT, such as bitemporal placement or unilateral standard pulse width. However, RUL-UB has demonstrated slower antidepressant efficacy in comparison to the other techniques. One method to enhance the speed of response to RUL-UB ECT is administration of 5 times a week (termed "daily") treatments as opposed to the more standard twice or thrice weekly schedule. In this open label study, we treated 20 depressed patients with daily RUL-UB treatments for up to 2 weeks (ie, 10 treatments) using standardized assessments of depression and retrograde amnesia. Response and remission rates were commensurate with those reported in other recent studies using this technique with twice or thrice weekly treatment frequencies, and there was no clinically significant effect on retrograde memory function. We conclude that daily administration of RUL-UB ECT may shorten the duration of the course of ECT treatments without compromising cognition. A randomized trial comparing this technique to a thrice weekly schedule of RUL-UB treatments is indicated.

Treatment of Catatonia With Ultrabrief Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Case Series.

Catatonia is a syndrome heterogeneous with regard to presentation and etiology. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains the first-line treatment for catatonia. Literature review reveals only a few published case reports on the use of right unilateral (RUL) ECT in catatonia, 1 case report on ultrabrief RUL ECT, and an absence of evidence on the relative effectiveness and tolerability of RUL versus bilateral ECT in treating catatonia. In contrast, there are multiple reports in the literature of robustly dosed bilateral ECT, often administered on consecutive days. Reasons for choosing this intervention over the better-tolerated RUL treatment include assumptions about its relative speed and/or breadth of efficacy. Here we present a case series of 13 catatonic patients treated in an academic center over the course of the last 3 years. Our experience suggests that ultrabrief RUL ECT can rapidly and effectively treat catatonia from diverse etiologies.

Relative Ineffectiveness of Ultrabrief Right Unilateral Versus Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy in Depression

Bilateral (BL) electrode placement delivered at 2.5 times the initial seizure threshold (ST; 2.5 x ST) is the gold standard method for seizure delivery during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). However, there is a growing interest in using a high dose (6 x ST) with ultrabrief right unilateral (UB-RUL) electrode placement to reduce the incidence of possible short-term memory problems associated with BL ECT. Although studies have found UB-RUL ECT to have similar effectiveness to BL ECT, the objective of this study was to determine potential differences in efficiency (ie, the number of treatments needed to reach remission). Electroconvulsive therapeutic data for 56 patients with depression treated during 2006 and 2007 were analyzed via retrospective chart review. A total of 26 patients were started on UB-RUL ECT, whereas 30 patients were started on brief pulse BL ECT. The patients started on high-dose UB-RUL ECT required significantly more treatments than the patients started on BL ECT (9.4 [3.3] vs 7.7 [2.8] treatments). Of the 26 patients started on UB-RUL ECT, 12 (46%) experienced a lack of effectiveness and/or insufficient seizure induction and were thus switched to BL ECT; the 8 patients switched because of lack of effectiveness received a mean (SD) of 12.2 (2.9) treatments, whereas the 4 patients switched because of insufficient seizure induction received a mean (SD) of 11.3 (3.6) treatments. These findings add to an emerging story of reduced efficiency of UB-RUL versus BL electrode placement for an index course of ECT for the treatment of depression.