Decompression Of Ulnar Nerve Research Articles

Comparing scissors and scalpels to a novel surgical instrument: a biomechanical sectioning study

BackgroundThis study introduces a novel surgical instrument to reduce iatrogenic nerve injuries during procedures such as carpal tunnel and ulnar nerve decompression surgery. These injuries often result from direct damage to surrounding tissues by surgical instruments, whose designs have remained largely unchanged over the past decades. The novel device is a modified surgical forceps that has a deployable surgical scalpel that runs along a groove on the forceps. This design protects important anatomical structures while allowing fast dissection and cutting of fascial layers.MethodsThe process used to develop a novel instrument included computer-aided design (CAD) modeling, 3D printing for prototyping, and the fabrication of an aluminum prototype. Biomechanical testing was performed with the novel device, iris scissors, bandage scissors, and a scalpel on an MTS Static Materials Test System. The peak force to slide-cut, number of cut attempts, and percentage cut on first attempt were compared between the prototype and traditional surgical tools. The materials cut in testing were Ace™ bandage, stockinette, and gauze. Statistical analyses were performed using Welch’s t-tests and Fisher’s exact tests.ResultsCompared to conventional bandage and iris scissors, the novel surgical instrument required significantly less force to cut through an Ace™ bandage, stockinette, and gauze (p < 0.01). The number of cuts required to transect those same materials with the novel device was comparable to that of the scalpel and bandage scissors. Additionally, while there were no differences between the novel device and the other devices for an Ace™ bandage and stockinette, the novel device tended to cut a greater percentage of gauze in one pass than did the iris scissors.ConclusionThe novel surgical instrument designed in this study required less force compared to conventional scissors, demonstrated cutting efficiency similar to that of a scalpel blade, and had more safety features than either instrument. This study highlights the value of collaboration between biomedical engineering and orthopedic surgery departments on innovation in medical technology, through which new technologies with improved design and functionality demonstrate the potential to reduce iatrogenic injuries.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes of a Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant: A Case Series

Abstract Purpose Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC), scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC), and Kienbock's disease are some of the most common pathologies to result in arthritis of the wrist in patients with a relatively high functional demand. An option for treatment where there are not two cartilage surfaces suitable for articulation to allow either a proximal row carpectomy (PRC) or partial fusion is to perform a PRC combined with resurfacing of the capitate using a pyrocarbon implant (RCPI). The purpose of this study was to examine the medium-term survivorship, clinical-, and patient-reported outcomes of the RCPI in a case series of patients. Methods Survivorship was assessed in 46 patients at approximately 21 months or greater (range = 21–144, median follow-up = 67). Of these, 36 patients completed patient-reported outcome measures (Visual Analogue Scales, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand–short form, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Global Rating of Change) at 21 months or greater. Patient population was 42% (n = 16) female, average age was 59 (range = 25–79), and majority had the operation on their right hand (78%, n = 35). Results Implant survival can be confirmed until most recent follow-up at a median of 60 months (range = 21–144), with Kaplan–Meier analysis indicating an 83% survival probability at 10 years. Complications at 21 months or greater were observed in 11 patients (24%), with 9 (20%) patients receiving further surgery (7 wrist fusions, 1 ulnar nerve decompression, and 1 distal radioulnar joint replacement [RCPI in situ]). Time to revision was a mean of 20 months (range = 4–39). Comparison between passive range of motion at 21 months to 4 years and &gt;5 years showed no significance (p &gt; 0.5), suggesting 2- to 4-year outcomes are maintained midterm. Conclusions The RCPI extends the indications for PRC where there is unsatisfactory cartilage on the proximal capitate, the lunate facet of the radius, or both. It provides a safe and effective treatment for pain relief and improved functional use of the hand for SLAC and SNAC arthritis without the increased morbidity of more complex arthroplasty or total wrist arthrodesis. Level of Evidence IV, case series

Understanding risk factors for revision surgery after cubital tunnel release: Analysis of patient selection, surgeon, and clinical factors

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to identify and characterize factors that may contribute to revision surgery following primary cubital tunnel release (CuTR) surgery. MethodsA retrospective study was performed by reviewing all patients who underwent CuTR at a single institution between 2014 and 2021. Only primary in situ CuTR surgeries were included. Exclusion criteria were any case of primary ulnar nerve transpositions or ulnar nerve decompression surgery related to pathology other than isolated ulnar neuropathy (ie. elbow fracture repair, medial epicondylitis debridement, etc.). Revision surgery was defined as return to the operating room by the index surgeon or another surgeon within the same practice for repeat ulnar nerve decompression and/or transposition. Patient demographics and surgical information was analyzed to determine factors that may be associated with revision surgery following primary in situ ulnar nerve decompression. ResultsA total of 1367 patients met inclusion criteria. Revision rate following primary CuTR was 1.2 ​% (n ​= ​16). Of the factors evaluated, younger age (46.6 vs 57.0 years) and a history of cervical stenosis had a higher correlation with undergoing a revision. Patients who had revision surgery were more likely to have negative electrodiagnostic studies versus those who did not. Otherwise, there was no association between sex, race, tobacco use, medical comorbidities, symptom severity, bilateral symptoms, or concurrent surgery and the subsequent need for revision ulnar nerve decompression. ConclusionsFollowing primary in situ CuTR, younger age or a history of cervical stenosis may be at higher risk of undergoing revision surgery. Additionally, patients without electrodiagnostic evidence of ulnar neuropathy may have less reliable outcomes versus those who have a positive nerve study. Given the unpredictable nature of ulnar nerve surgery, further prospective data including diagnostic imaging and biomechanical evaluation of patients following ulnar nerve release may help provide a deeper understanding of this unique patient population. Level of evidencePrognostic, level IV.

Return to Activity Following Isolated Ulnar Nerve Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Ulnar neuropathy is one of the more commonly diagnosed mononeuropathies; despite this, a definitive surgical treatment strategy has not been widely agreed upon. In this study, we systematically review the literature and assess return to play or activity outcomes in patients with neuritis or neuropathy undergoing in situ decompression, subcutaneous transposition, or submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. We hypothesized that ulnar nerve transposition or decompression in the absence of concomitant ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) pathology would have a high rate of return to activity. Relevant studies were generated from 1975 to 2023 using PubMed, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus. Articles reporting on return to play or activity outcomes following isolated ulnar nerve transposition or decompression for ulnar neuritis were included. Studies evaluating patients with concomitant UCL injury or revision surgery were excluded. A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, ranging from 1977 to 2021. There were a total of 358 patients with a reported return to play or activity status across all studies with an average age of 27.2 years (range, 11-75). Successful return to play, activity, or work was reported in 303 patients (84.6%). Patients undergoing transposition, subcutaneous (n = 232) and submuscular (n = 20), had return rates of 87.9% and 95%, respectively. Patients undergoing in situ decompression (n = 106) had return rates of 75.5%. This systematic review found an 84.6% return to activity rate following ulnar nerve transposition or decompression in the absence of concomitant UCL pathology. Overall, transposition or decompression of the ulnar nerve provides a favorable return to activity rates and with appropriate indications and surgical technique will likely yield a successful return.

WALANT office based endoscopic cubital tunnel release

Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is a common condition caused by compression of the ulnar nerve around the medial elbow. Surgical treatment usually involves open in situ ulnar nerve decompression unless ulnar nerve instability is noted. Endoscopic techniques for cubital tunnel release have been developed and implemented with excellent patient and surgeon satisfaction. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release can be performed in an office based procedure room under wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet principles. We present our setup and technique for performing an endoscopic cubital tunnel release procedure in an office based setting under local anesthesia. Methods: Local anesthesia is injected along the course of the ulnar nerve on the medial arm and forearm extending 10 cm proximal and distal to the medial epicondyle. After allowing approximately 30 min for appropriate vasoconstriction, the patient is placed in a supine position with the arm abducted and externally rotated position. The endoscopic cubital tunnel release is then performed. Discussion: Our described technique eliminates the need for placement of a prophylactic tourniquet and thereby the need for the procedure to be performed within an OR setting. It also utilizes a single-stage anesthetic administration, which facilitates ease of completion and performance in an office based setting. There is a significant cost savings when endoscopic cubital tunnel release is performed in an office-based procedure room compared to in the operating room. Conclusions: Office-based endoscopic cubital tunnel release can be safely performed utilizing WALANT techniques, leading to high patient satisfaction and decreased overall cost of care. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV

Wide-awake surgery using local anaesthesia with adrenaline for ulnar nerve decompression and medial epicondylectomy.

Ulnar nerve decompression with medial epicondylectomy was performed under Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) for cubital tunnel syndrome. Prospective investigation showed that WALANT is a safe and effective method of anaesthesia with good patient satisfaction.

Ulnar Nerve Hydrodissection at the Elbow With Ultrasound Guidance

Background: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is common, and treatment ranges from bracing and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to surgical decompression. Prior to surgical intervention, some patients may opt to receive perineural injections to the ulnar nerve. The goal of this injection is to reduce pain, improve symptoms, and decrease nerve cross-sectional area through mechanical decompression. While the use of hydrodissection as a treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome has been well studied, there are few studies evaluating its utility in UNE. Indications: Ultrasound-guided perineural injections can be used to alleviate symptoms of UNE caused by compression. The use of a gel stand-off technique is helpful in maintaining adequate visualization of the needle with a steeper needle angle. Technique Description: The procedure was carried out with patient supine, shoulder abducted to 90°, and the forearm supinated. A 15-6 MHz linear array ultrasound transducer was used to localize the right ulnar nerve proximal to the retrocondylar groove at an area of focal hypoechogenicity and increased nerve cross-sectional area. A 3 mL mixture of 2 mL of 1% lidocaine and 1 mL of 10 mg/mL dexamethasone was injected using a sonographically guided in-plane anterior-to-posterior technique. Results: Our patient was seen 3 weeks after her right-sided ulnar nerve hydrodissection and had experienced temporary reduction in symptoms. Discussion/Conclusion: UNE is a common cause of focal neuropathy. Most patients will experience adequate relief of symptoms with conservative treatment modalities. If patients do not experience adequate symptom relief, ultrasound-guided ulnar nerve injection is a minimally invasive option that can provide symptom relief. However, if patients continue to experience significant symptom burden, it is reasonable to discuss surgical options for ulnar nerve decompression. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The Crossing Motor Ulnar Nerve Branch at Elbow.

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common nerve entrapment, and understanding the anatomy is crucial for the success of the nerve release. During ulnar nerve release for cubital tunnel syndrome, a motor branch is frequently encountered crossing anteriorly over the ulnar nerve from its medial/ulnar side proximally to the lateral/radial side distally. Little has been noted about this crossing branch in the literature. In this anatomic study, we sought to characterize this branch further and discuss its potential significance in cubital tunnel release. We performed a cadaveric dissection of 48 elbow specimens as if performing a cubital tunnel release. We assessed for the presence of the crossing motor branch of the ulnar nerve and measured the distance from the medial epicondyle to the branch takeoff and to its target of innervation. Of our 48 specimens, 34 (71%) were noted to have a crossing motor branch at the area of compression by the deep flexor carpi ulnaris muscle fascia (common aponeurosis). On average, the distance from the medial epicondyle to the branch origin from the ulnar nerve was 18.2 mm and to the target muscle innervation was 28.4 mm. Identifying this branch is important for performing a cubital tunnel release, and awareness of this anatomy during ulnar nerve decompression procedures may help avoid injury to this motor branch.

Risk Factors for Rescue Opioid Prescription After Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Concerns regarding the ongoing opioid epidemic have led to heightened scrutiny of postoperative opioid prescribing patterns for common orthopedic surgical procedures. This study investigated patient- and procedure-specific risk factors for additional postoperative opioid rescue prescriptions following ambulatory cubital tunnel surgery. A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent cubital tunnel surgery at 2 academic medical centers between June 1, 2015 and March 1, 2020. Patient demographics, comorbidities, prior opioid history, and surgical variables were recorded. The primary outcome was postoperative rescue opioid prescription. Univariate and bivariate statistical analyses were performed. Two hundred seventy-four patients were included, of whom 171 (62%) underwent in situ ulnar nerve decompression and 103 (38%) underwent ulnar nerve decompression with anterior transposition. The median postoperative opioid prescription amount was 90 morphine equivalent units (MEU) for the total cohort, 77.5 MEU for in situ ulnar nerve decompression, and 112.5 MEU for ulnar nerve decompression with transposition. Twenty-two patients (8%) required additional rescue opioid prescriptions postoperatively. Female sex, fibromyalgia, chronic opioid use, chronic pain diagnosis, and recent opioid were associated with the need for additional postoperative rescue opioid prescriptions. While most patients do not require additional rescue opioid prescriptions after cubital tunnel surgery, chronic pain patients and patients with pain sensitivity syndromes are at risk for requiring additional rescue opioid prescriptions. For these high-risk patients, preoperative collaboration of a multidisciplinary team may be beneficial for developing a perioperative pain management plan that is both safe and effective.

Three Episodes of Postanesthesia Paradoxical Vocal Cord Motion Disorder in the Same Patient: A Case Report.

Postanesthesia paradoxical vocal cord motion disorder (PVCMD) is often benign. However, if not recognized, PVCMD can lead to unnecessary treatments. Our patient had 3 different surgeries over a period of 20 months. The first episode of PVCMD occurred after a shoulder surgery, and the patient was reintubated. PVCMD was correctly diagnosed and treated successfully with reassurance after an ulnar nerve decompression. The third episode of PVCMD occurred after a cervical fusion surgery. Prevertebral edema from surgery further compromised the airways. Our case demonstrates the challenges of identifying and managing perioperative PVCMD, especially when surgical complications confound the airway management.

Ulnar Nerve Decompression With Subcutaneous Transposition

Background: Medial-sided elbow injuries are becoming increasingly common among throwing athletes due to overuse and increased specialization at early ages. High valgus stress and repetitive elbow flexion/extension during throwing not only affects the ligaments and dynamic support of the elbow, but commonly affects the ulnar nerve. Indications: Management of cubital tunnel syndrome is initially rest, therapy, and functional training; however, if conservative measures do not appropriately address the ulnar neuropathy, surgical decompression with subcutaneous transposition is a reliable treatment option. Technique Description: An incision is created over the medial epicondyle. The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve is identified and protected. The ulnar nerve is identified and tagged with a vessel loop to allow for appropriate handling of the nerve. Decompression of the ulnar nerve begins proximally by spreading the tissues superficial to the ulnar nerve and splitting the fascia overlying it. Then, dissection deep to the nerve is performed. A small strip of the medial intermuscular septum will be used as a sling to hold the nerve securely in the transposed position. This is released proximally and the distal attachment to the medial epicondyle is left in place. Decompression is then continued distally by releasing the superficial fascia over the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) and a portion of the deep FCU muscle belly and fascia. The nerve is decompressed circumferentially, while preserving penetrating branches to the FCU as able. Ultimately, the ulnar nerve is decompressed 10 cm proximal and 10 cm distal to the medial epicondyle. The intermuscular septum is then pulled over the nerve, checked for appropriate length, and sutured in place both posterior and anterior to the ulnar nerve. Results: Symptom improvement after decompression and transposition is high (&gt;90%); however, performance outcomes in overhead and throwing athletes is variable, and return to previous or higher level of play ranges from 60% to 90%. Discussion/Conclusion: Ulnar nerve decompression and transposition can reliably address underlying symptoms, but results are mixed for return to sport outcomes in overhead and throwing athletes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Immediate Versus Delayed Mobilization After Cubital Tunnel Release Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose: It is unknown whether early mobilization after cubital tunnel decompression improves functional outcomes without increasing complication risks. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of early mobilization compared to delayed mobilization of the elbow after ulnar nerve decompression. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing adults who received early mobilization or late mobilization were included. Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PEDro, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization database were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. Results: Of the 2183 studies identified and screened, five studies (two RCT and three observational) totaling 224 patients (232 elbows) were included in this review. Evidence from two RCTs (100 patients) suggests that early mobilization may result in a large reduction in the amount of time needed to return to work (mean difference 40.1 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-64 days earlier, I2 = 85%, low-certainty evidence) and little to no difference in grip strength (0 kg, 95% CI = −0.17 to 0.17, I2 = 0%, low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference in adverse events or range of motion (low to very-low certainty evidence). Pooled results from the three observational studies showed similar findings (very low-certainty evidence). There were no studies that evaluated upper extremity related quality of life. Conclusion: Immobilizing patients for periods longer than 3 days appears to delay patient's return to work with no appreciable clinical benefit.

Paper 18: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of the Modified Jobe vs. Modified Docking Techniques for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in the Elbow

Objectives: Overhead throwing athletes, notably pitchers, subject the elbow to tremendous valgus stress, and numerous studies have demonstrated an increasing incidence of ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow (UCL) injury. However, surgical reconstruction has transformed this injury from career-ending to career-interruptive. Two primary techniques exist for UCL reconstruction (UCLR): 1) the Modified Jobe and 2) the Modified Docking techniques. Prior biomechanical comparisons have reported equivalent ulnohumeral stability. Systematic reviews of clinical studies have suggested that the Docking technique may result in improved rates of return to play (RTP) and fewer complications, but these comparisons have been indirect and complicated by changes in technique. Our objective was to perform the first prospective, randomized comparison of UCLR utilizing the Modified Jobe or Modified Docking technique as measured by Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score, Andrews-Timmerman score, and Conway-Jobe score. As secondary outcomes, we sought to compare pre- and postoperative imaging characteristics, required tourniquet times, rate of complications, and RTP data. We hypothesized that no difference exists between the two techniques with regard to any of the above outcomes. Methods: This study was a single-surgeon, prospective, randomized trial comparing the Modified Jobe and Modified Docking techniques for primary UCLR. Patients were eligible if they had clinical and radiographic evidence of UCL injury and participated in overhead sports. Patients were excluded if they were not an overhead athlete, lacked clinical and radiographic evidence of a UCL tear, or had a history of previous elbow surgery. An a priori power analysis was performed utilizing historic data from both techniques to generate a sample size of 80 (40 in each group). All patients were randomized to one of the two techniques for UCLR using a standardized, contralateral gracilis autograft. All patients underwent the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol including throwing and batting progressions. Patient reported outcomes (PROs; KJOC score, Andrews-Timmerman score, and Conway-Jobe score) were obtained preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 years postoperative. Pre- and post-operative imaging including both stress ultrasound (SUS) and magnetic resonance (MRI/MRA) were obtained. Additional information including demographics, intraoperative data, complications, and RTP data were collected. T-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to calculate differences between continuous data. Chi-Square or Fisher’s Exact were used for categorical data. Results: There were 40 patients (38M/2F) enrolled in the Jobe group and 40 patients (39M/1F) enrolled in the Docking group. Demographics including sex ratio, age, time between injury and surgery, and sport and level of play were similar between groups. Detailed patient demographic data is given in Table 1. Six patients in the Jobe group and eight patients in the Docking group underwent concomitant anterior subcutaneous UNT (p=0.769). Gracilis autograft harvest and closure required similar mean tourniquet time in both groups (28.7 minutes in Jobe group vs 28.3 minutes in Docking group; p=0.721). However, UCLR required significantly longer upper extremity tourniquet time in the Jobe group (101.0 minutes vs. 92.0 minutes; p=0.008). Preoperatively, patients reported similar levels of function via all PROs. Postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year and 18 months, both groups reported similar PROs. At two years, patients reported similar scores in terms of Andrews Timmerman and Conway Jobe scores, however the Docking group reported significantly higher mean KJOC scores (75.0 vs 85.0; p=0.025). Following surgery, both groups took a similar mean time to swing a bat, to begin tossing, and to begin a mound program. Of the patients that returned for two year follow up in clinic, 28/32 in the Jobe group returned to play at a mean of 13.4 months, compared to 27/27 in the Docking group who returned to play at 14.3 months (p=0.166). Detailed patient outcome data is given in Table 2. All grafts were intact and showed progressive healing on MR and SUS at final radiographic follow-up. There were no significant differences in the rate of complications. One patient in the Docking group required reoperation with revision ulnar nerve decompression with transposition for persistent ulnar nerve symptoms. No patient in the Jobe group required reoperation. Conclusions: This study is the first and only prospective, randomized trial evaluating the outcomes of the Modified Jobe and Modified Docking techniques for UCLR. The study identified high rates of good-to-excellent results with equivalent RTP rates and time to RTP for both techniques. Surgeons should continue to utilize the technique with which they are most comfortable, but the Docking technique demonstrated reduced tourniquet times and superior KJOC scores at 2 years. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Managing Ulnar Nerve Subluxation With a Medial Intermuscular Septum Sling.

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is a lifestyle-altering peripheral neuropathy lacking a consensus for optimal surgical management. We describe creation of a fascial "V-sling" without ulnar nerve transposition, which is associated with increased surgical morbidity compared with decompression. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel technique with effective ulnar nerve decompression and subluxation prevention by creating a fascial sling in patients with CuTS and ulnar nerve subluxation. We reviewed records of 39 elbows in 35 patients who underwent in situ ulnar nerve decompression and creation of a fascial sling in a "V" configuration to stabilize the nerve in its native position. We examined patient demographics, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, and patient outcomes. Chi-square and student's t test were used for all analysis. A total of 37 extremities in 33 patients undergoing nerve decompression had nerve subluxation confirmed intraoperatively. There was a statistically significant change in preoperative and postoperative SANE scores of 64.5 and 82.3, respectively. Mean QuickDASH scores decreased significantly from 49.3 preoperative to 10.8 postoperative. The long-term QuickDASH scores obtained at mean of 564 days were maintained at 10.76. This study describes a novel technique for treating CuTS by achieving in situ nerve decompression and addressing ulnar nerve subluxation with creation of an intermuscular septal sling. The technique improved functional outcomes and provided symptomatic relief, while avoiding risks commonly associated with nerve transposition.

CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE DIHYDRATE DEPOSITION DISEASE OF ELBOW WITH ULNAR NERVE NEUROPATHY: A CASE REPORT

Crystal deposition disorders are one of the causes of inflammatory arthropathy. A rare variety of this disorder is Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate deposition disease. It is usually seen in the elderly and progresses as calcifications in and around the joint i.e. Chondrocalcinosis with repeated synovitis leading to degenerative changes of large and unusual or non-weight-bearing joints. It is a case report of 43 years housewife with a gradually enlarging mass at posteromedial aspect of the left elbow with ulnar nerve weakness for 1 year. Radiographs revealed degenerative joint with periarticular calcifications. The electrodiagnostic test showed ulnar nerve demyelination and axonal neuropathy. Surgical excision with decompression of ulnar nerve was done. Histopathology revealed features consistent with Pseudogout. Subsequent follow-up resulted in improvement of nerve function with no clinicoradiological evidence of recurrence. So, degenerative changes with periarticular calcifications in non-weight-bearing joints should be suspected for pseudogout. It may be associated with compressive neuropathy.

Quantifying the Impact of COVID-19 on Hand and Wrist Surgery Procedural Volume: A National Analysis of 381,046 Cases

The purpose of this study is to quantify and describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on procedural volume trends in hand and wrist surgery in 2020 through early 2022 at multiple centers. In this retrospective comparative study, a real-time, national, federated research database was utilized to identify patients of interest from 56 healthcare organizations across the United States. Patients were queried from March 1, 2018, through February 28, 2022. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were chosen using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Hand Fellowship procedure requirements. Common hand and wrist surgeries exhibited substantial fluctuations in procedural volume per healthcare organization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Time periods with considerable procedural volume decreases corresponded with surges of increased COVID-19 caseloads and the emergence of COVID-19 variants. Periods of procedural volume increase occurred in summer 2020 as well as immediately following distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine to the general public. Fixation of metacarpal fracture, fixation of phalangeal fracture, tendon transfer, flexor tendon repair, and extensor tendon repair consistently showed decreased volumes over the study period. In contrast, ulnar nerve decompression was the only procedure to experience a statistically significant increase in volume over an entire year (2021) as compared to before the pandemic. Major milestones of the COVID-19 pandemic correlated with fluctuations in the number of hand and wrist procedures performed across the United States. Future studies should seek to evaluate the impact of patient backlogs and individual procedure fluctuations on financial impacts, patient outcomes, and orthopaedic trainee experience.

Migraine Headaches in Patients with Upper Extremity Compressive Neuropathy.

Upper extremity nerve compression syndromes and migraines caused by nerve entrapment have many similarities, including patient presentation, anatomical findings, and treatment by surgical decompression of affected nerves. Parallels between the two conditions point toward the possibility of shared predisposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between migraine and upper extremity nerve compression. Nine thousand five hundred fifty-eight patients who underwent nerve decompression surgery of the upper extremity (median, ulnar, and radial nerves and thoracic outlet syndrome) as identified by CPT and International Classification of Diseases codes were included in the analysis. International Classification of Diseases codes for migraine and comorbidities included as part of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were identified. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed. Median nerve decompression (OR, 1.3; 95 percent CI, 1.0 to 1.8; p = 0.046) and multiple nerve decompressions (OR, 1.7; 95 percent CI, 1.2 to 2.5; p = 0.008) were independently associated with higher rates of migraine compared to ulnar nerve decompression and thoracic outlet syndrome. Older age and male sex had a negative association with migraine. History of psychiatric disease, rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases, hypothyroidism, hypertension, and chronic pulmonary disease were independently associated with migraine headache. Patients who undergo median and multiple nerve decompression are more likely to experience migraine headache. It is important to recognize this overlap and provide comprehensive patient screening for both conditions. This shared predisposition and better understanding of a common disease mechanism and genetics may provide greater insight into the pathogenesis and therefore treatment of these clinical problems. Risk, III.

Paper 11: Utility of Objective Testing for Initiation of a Throwing Program Following Shoulder and Elbow Surgery in Competitive Baseball Players

Paper 11: Utility of Objective Testing for Initiation of a Throwing Program Following Shoulder and Elbow Surgery in Competitive Baseball Players

Prevalence, management, and outcomes of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty: a case-control study and review of the literature

Neurologic injury is a rare and potentially devastating complication of shoulder arthroplasty. Patients typically present with a mixed plexopathy or mononeuropathy, most commonly affecting the axillary and radial nerves. Given the paucity of studies available on the topic, our goal was to elucidate the prevalence of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty and to describe the treatment course and outcomes of neurologic injuries. This is a retrospective case-control study performed at a single, urban, academic institution. Consecutive patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2020 were reviewed, and patients with a documented nerve injury were identified. A control group of patients without nerve injury were selected in a 2:1 ratio controlling for age and procedure type (TSA vs. RSA; primary vs. revision). Data collected included demographics, comorbidities as per the Charlson Comorbidity Index, radiographic evaluations, surgical and implant details, patient-reported outcome measures, and perioperative complications. Of 923 patients, 33 (3.6%) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury: 10 (2.1%) after TSA, 23 (5.0%) after RSA, and 3 (7.8%) after revision arthroplasty. Axillary mononeuropathy was most common (42%), followed by brachial plexopathies (18%). There was no significant difference in age, sex, race, body mass index, and preoperative diagnoses between groups. Patients with nerve injury had fewer comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index <3, 33 vs. 65%, P<.001). Patients with nerve injury had higher rates of cervical spine pathology (15 vs. 6%; P= .15) and increased postoperative lateralization (8.9 mm [7.2] vs. 5.5 mm [7.3]; P<.06). The majority (91%) were managed with observation alone. Three (9%) underwent an additional procedure: carpal tunnel release (1, 3%), ulnar nerve decompression (1, 3%), and ulnar nerve transposition (1, 3%) for peripheral compressive neuropathies. At the final follow-up, 19 (57%) nerves fully recovered, and 14 (43%) showed mild residual sensorimotor dysfunction. The mean time to first sign of recovery and ultimate recovery were 11 (7.2) and 36 (23.5) weeks, respectively. At the final follow-up, patients with nerve injury performed worse on patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog score pain (2.2 vs. 1.0, P<.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (67.8 vs. 84.8, P<.001), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (62 vs. 77, P= .009). Nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty is rare, occurring in 3.6% of our patient population. Axillary mononeuropathy and brachial plexopathies are the most common. Most patients can be managed expectantly with observation and will recover at least partial nerve function, although clinical outcomes remain inferior to those without nerve complication.

Takotsubo Syndrome in a Young Patient After a Neurosurgical Operation

Cardiomyopathy syndrome (stress-cardiomyopathy) is an acute reversible systolic dysfunction of left (or rare right) ventricle without stenotic atherosclerosis and/or thrombosis of coronary artery. We are presenting a case of stress-cardiomyopathy after the neurosurgery. Aim : The aim of this observation is to demonstrate a case of takotsubo syndrome in a young patient in the early postoperative period. Key points : A 21-years-old woman was hospitalized in the neurosurgery department. Hospitalization was performed due to persistent pain in the left elbow joint with irradiation to left 4 &amp; 5 hand fingers as well as dysfunction of the left elbow joint, as a result of previous surgical intervention for a fracture one year before. Due to the lack of a positive effect from conservative therapy, it was decided to conduct a second surgical treatment. Decompression of the left ulnar nerve was performed at the level of the cubital canal with its transposition. This was complicated by the development of takotsubo syndrome in the postoperative period, confirmed by echocardiography, ECG, as well as the absence of atherosclerotic changes in the coronary artery according to coronary angiography. Conclusio n: The early postoperative period may complicate of development of takotsubo syndrome, in the neurosurgical operations and in the young age too.