Ulnar Head Prosthesis Research Articles

Long-term survivorship of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

IV.

Clinical outcome and survival rate of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis for reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint depending on co-morbidity and different indications.

Ulnar head prostheses have been developed to restore the integrity of the DRUJ and relieve pain. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcome of the clinical and radiographic results as well as the survival rate of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) depending on co-morbidity and different indications. The Herbert ulnar head prosthesis was implanted in 62 patients. In the majority of the patients, the indication was given due to pain during forearm rotation. This was on account of painful instability of the distal ulna following Bowers (59.7%) or Kapandji procedure (16.1%), Darrach procedure (8.1%) or painful post-traumatic (12.9%) or primary osteoarthritis (3.2%). Of the 62 patients, 34 were men and 28 women. The mean age at the time of operation was 49years (range 18-84years). A clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed including pain scale, range of motion, grip strength and the DASH and modified Mayo wrist scores. The average follow-up was 84.5months (range 8-206months), and statistically significant reduction of pain was observed (p < 0.05). The range of motion of pro- and supination improved slightly, but not significantly, whereas the DASH score improved significantly from 56 to 43 (p < 0.05). Patients without an arthrodesis achieved better results in the DASH and in the modified Mayo wrist score. In 39 cases, a small amount of bone resorption was seen at the collar of the prosthesis in the follow-up radiographs. A revision surgery was necessary in 14 patients. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate after 15years was 90.3%. The long-term results of the UHP are encouraging regardless of different indications with a survival rate of more than 90% 7years following surgery, high patient satisfaction and good clinical and radiographic results. IV.

3D analysis of the distal ulna with regard to the design of a new ulnar head prosthesis

Study designA retrospective, single center, data analysis.ObjectivePersistent pain and instability are common complications after distal ulnar head arthroplasty. One main reason may be the insufficient representation of the anatomical structures with the prosthesis. Some anatomical structures are neglected such as the ulnar head offset and the ulnar torsion which consequently influences the wrist biomechanics.MethodsCT scans of the ulnae of forty healthy and asymptomatic patients were analyzed in a three-dimensional surface calculation program. In the best fit principle, cylinders were fitted into the medullary canal of the distal ulna and the ulnar head to determine their size. The distance between the central axes of the two cylinders was measured, which corresponds to the ulnar offset, and also their rotational orientation was measured, which corresponds to the ulnar torsion.ResultsThe mean medullary canal diameter was 5.8 mm (±0.8), and the ulnar head diameter was 15.8 mm (±1.5). The distance between the two cylinder axes was 3.89 mm (±0.78). The orientation of this offset was at an average of 8.63° (±15.28) of supination, reaching from 23° pronation to 32° supination.ConclusionWith these findings, a novel ulnar head prosthesis should have different available stem and head sizes but also have an existing but variable offset between these two elements. A preoperative three-dimensional analysis is due to the high variation of offset orientation highly recommended. These findings might help to better represent the patients natural wrist anatomy in the case of an ulnar head arthroplasty.Level of EvidenceIII.

Twenty-Year Experience With Primary Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty From a Single Institution

The use of implant arthroplasty in the distal radioulnar joint is increasing. Two main types of implants are commonly used, ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) and hemi or semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. The literature consists mainly of small patient series. The purpose of this study was to examine our long-term outcomes of distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. Patient data were collected in a patient registry from 2000 to 2019. The follow-up included radiographic examination, physical examination, Mayo Wrist Scores, pain level, range of motion, and grip strength. Reoperations were recorded. The implants were a semi-constrained prosthesis and a metallic UHP. The mean age at surgery was 50 years. Patient demographics were similar, but the semi-constrained group had a higher preoperative percentage of instability (85 vs 52 percent). The median follow-up time was 30 months for the semi-constrained implants group and 102 months for the UHP group. A total of 53 primary semi-constrained total joint arthroplasties and 102 UHPs were included. The grip strength and Mayo Wrist Score improved for both the implant groups. Pain reduced in 76% of the patients. Supination improved for the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty group. Lifting capacity was better in the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty patients. The unadjusted reoperation rate was 23% for the semi-constrained implants group and 34% for the UHP group. Twenty-two implants were bilateral; these had comparable results to unilateral implants. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated 94% survival rate for the semi-constrained implants group and 87% survival for the UHP group after 5 years. The risk factors associated with reoperation for the combined implant group included younger age at surgery, previous wrist surgery, ulnar shortening, and wrist fusion. Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty improved functional outcomes in both the implant groups, but reoperations were frequent. The semi-constrained implants group had better lifting capacity. The bilateral implants had comparable outcomes to the unilateral implants. Therapeutic IV.

Outcomes following Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty in the Setting of Total or Partial Wrist Fusion.

Purpose To evaluate the functional outcome and complications following primary ulnar head or total distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty in patients who have a partial or total wrist fusion. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 33 primary DRUJ implants in 31 patients who had a partial or total wrist fusion. Follow-up time averaged 67 months. There were 11 partial and 22 total wrist fusions with 22 ulnar head prosthesis and 11 total DRUJ implants. The mean age of the patients was 49 years. Eighty-one percent had previous surgeries with an average number of 4.6 previous wrist procedures. Pre- and postoperative pain levels were recorded. Mayo Wrist Scores were calculated. Grip strength, range of motion (ROM), and post-operative complications were noted. Results The pain scores improved in 67% of the patients. The Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly from a mean of 39 preoperatively to 51 postoperatively. The grip strength and pro-supination remained stable. The wrist ROM also remained stable in the patients with partial wrist fusions. During the follow-up period, 10 (30%) of the DRUJ implants were explanted, with a trend toward higher explantation rates in total wrist fusions with one in the partial fusion group and nine in the total wrist fusion group. Four of the explantations happened in the first postoperative year. Nineteen (61%) of the patients required a second surgery for a DRUJ implant-related complication; this rate was similar between the partial and total fusion groups. Conclusions DRUJ replacement resulted in improved pain scores and Mayo wrist scores in the majority of patients; however, the combination of primary DRUJ arthroplasty and total wrist fusion was associated with high complication rates. Surgeons should be aware of the high complication rate seen with DRUJ arthroplasty when combined with total wrist fusion.

Salvage of Painful Porous Coated Stem Ulnar Head Prosthesis With Semiconstrained Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty

To determine the functional outcome and complications after conversion from a painful and unstable ulnar head prosthesis to a semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. We conducted a retrospective review of 11 ulnar head prostheses in 10 patients with porous coated stems that were revised to semiconstrained prostheses. The median age of the patients was 47 years. The median number of wrist surgeries prior to conversion was 4 (range, 1-9). The median time from the ulnar head implant to the revision surgery was 47 months. Pre- and postoperative pain levels were recorded. Mayo Wrist Scores were calculated. Grip strength, range of motion, and complications and reoperations were recorded. All patients reported moderate or severe pain before surgery, whereas 3 patients reported moderate pain after surgery. The Mayo Wrist Score improved considerably from a median of 50 before surgery to 65 after surgery. The grip strength and forearm pronation-supination showed no change following surgery. The median wrist flexion-extension range improved considerably. Follow-up was a median of 64 (range, 15-132) months after revision surgery. Removal of the ulnar head implant was described as difficult by the surgeons, except in 1 case where the implant was loose. Resection of bone from the distal ulna was often necessary. One patient needed a reoperation requiring prosthesis removal for aseptic loosening of the stem 5 years after revision. There were 2 nondisplaced periprosthetic fractures successfully treated with cast immobilization and 2 additional minor complications, 1 postoperative stitch abscess, and 1 extensor carpi ulnaris tendinitis. Conversion from an ulnar head implant to a semiconstrained prosthesis provided improved pain scores and function with a low reoperation rate in this patient series. Removal of an ulnar head prosthesis can be technically challenging, but it can be performed leaving enough bone stock for immediate implantation of a semiconstrained implant. Therapeutic V.

A three-dimensional virtual morphometry study of the sigmoid notch of the distal radius.

Our primary objectives were to create a reliable, noninvasive method for three-dimensional morphometry of deep bony parameters within the sigmoid notch of the distal radius, to identify its morphological patterns, and to identify any significant variation between the left and the right wrists. Our secondary objectives were to obtain morphometric values that could represent our population and to identify any possible ethnic variations. Computed tomography scans of 102 wrists from 51 healthy individuals were analyzed using a virtualization software. Four anatomical parameters at the distal radius sigmoid notch, namely, the radius of curvature, depth, version angle, and sagittal slope were measured. Morphological patterns of the sigmoid notch surface were identified. The results were statistically analyzed to assess the reliability of the technique and were compared with previously published literature. Comparing our findings with previously published values, our study revealed a slightly larger radius of curvature and sagittal slope, while revealing a smaller depth and version. We identified the S-type, C-type, and ski-slope morphological variants. The flat-face morphological variant, however, was not identified. The sigmoid notch at the left and right wrists were similar, except for the radius of curvature. This study demonstrates a noninvasive, fast, reliable, and reproducible technique for analyzing the sigmoid notch of the distal radius. In wrist injuries with intact distal radius sigmoid notch but involving comminuted fractures of the ulnar head, ulnar head replacement may be indicated. In such cases, analysis of the ipsilateral intact sigmoid notch would allow us to prepare an ulnar head prosthesis of appropriate size.

Midterm Outcomes of the Use of a Spherical Ulnar Head Prosthesis for Failed Sauvé-Kapandji Procedures

The use of a spherical ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) for the treatment of symptomatic radioulnar convergence after Sauvé-Kapandji (SK) procedure has shown promising results in the short term. This study aims to evaluate the midterm outcome of the original cohort of patients treated with this technique. Seventeen patients with unstable ulnar stumps confirmed both clinically and radiographically were studied. The etiology for the initial SK procedure included posttraumatic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) incongruity, primary DRUJ arthrosis, and dysplastic DRUJ. Fourteen of the 17 patients had a minimum of 2, and a maximum of 6, operations prior to having a spherical UHP. All patients suffered from severe pain with difficulty in performing work and daily activities. Ceramic UHP was used for all patients, except 2 in whom a cobalt chrome head was used. The average follow-up was 6 years (range, 4-17 years). A marked reduction in pain was observed with 11 patients reporting that they remained pain free. The range of motion of the wrist and power grip was maintained and showed a statistically significant improvement at the late follow-up. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score also significantly improved from 77 to 41. There were no signs of prosthetic loosening at the midterm follow-up. The 2 patients with cobalt chrome prostheses had pain and osteolysis requiring revision to total DRUJ prosthesis. Two patients with dorsal prosthetic subluxation were successfully treated with distal radial osteotomy. The midterm results of ceramic spherical UHP for failed SK procedures in this small patient series are encouraging. Therapeutic IV.

Ulnar Head Replacement: 21 Cases; Mean Follow-Up, 7.5 Years

To report clinical and radiographic outcomes for the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis after a mean of 7.5 years (range, 2.0-12.5 years). We performed 22 Herbert ulnar head prosthesis arthroplasties between 2000 and 2011. Five were primary procedures, and the remaining 17 were done after an average of 2 (range, 1-5) previous operations. The mean age at surgery was 55 years (range, 31-74 years). Follow-up including clinical examination, standardized questionnaires, and radiographic examination was done after mean 7.5 years (range, 2.0-12.5 years) in 21 cases. We used the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire, and the Mayo wrist score questionnaire. Pain and satisfaction were evaluated with a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Measurements of range of motion and strength for grip were recorded. Wrist range of motion was not affected by the arthroplasty except for supination, which significantly improved from 55° to 70°. At follow-up, grip strength averaged 25 kg (range, 10-48 kg) in the operated wrists and 31 kg (range, 8-74 kg) on the contralateral side. Visual analog scale-pain averaged 2.9 (range, 0-8.7) during activity and 1.7 (range, 0-7) at rest. Satisfaction VAS was 8.9 (range, 4.3-10). Five patients had VAS-pain above 5 during activity, and 1 patient was dissatisfied and regretted having undergone arthroplasty. Mean outcomes were 27 (range, 5-50) for Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand measure, 31 (range, 0-90) for the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, and 71 (range, 30-90) for the Mayo wrist score. One patient was reoperated with capsuloplasty 9 months after the arthroplasty owing to recurrence of painful instability. Full stability was not achieved but the pain resolved. None of the implants showed any radiographic signs of loosening. The Herbert ulnar head prosthesis was a safe method of treatment and provided satisfactory midterm results for selected cases of distal radioulnar joint disorders. Increased knowledge of performance for ulnar head implant arthroplasty may aid surgical decision making for distal radioulnar joint disorders. Therapeutic IV.

Salvage of Failed Resection Arthroplasties of the Distal Radioulnar Joint Using an Ulnar Head Prosthesis: Long-term Results

Salvage of Failed Resection Arthroplasties of the Distal Radioulnar Joint Using an Ulnar Head Prosthesis: Long-term Results

Ulnar head replacement and related biomechanics.

A stable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is mandatory for the function and load transmission in the wrist and forearm. Resectional salvage procedures such as the Darrach procedure, Bowers arthroplasty, and Sauvé-Kapandji procedure include the potential risk of radioulnar instability and impingement, which can lead to pain and weakness. Soft tissue stabilizing techniques have only limited success rates in solving these problems. In an attempt to stabilize the distal forearm mechanically following ulnar head resection, various endoprostheses have been developed to replace the ulnar head. The prostheses can be used for secondary treatment of failed ulnar head resection, but they can also achieve good results in the primary treatment of osteoarthritis of the DRUJ. Our experience consists of twenty-five patients (follow-up 30 months) with DRUJ osteoarthritis who were treated with an ulnar head prosthesis, with improvement in pain, range of motion, and grip strength. An ulnar head prosthesis should be considered as a treatment option for a painful DRUJ.

Wrist &amp; Hand

The August 2012 Wrist &amp; Hand Roundup360 looks at: the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis; the five-year outcome for wrist arthroscopic surgery; four-corner arthrodesis with headless screws; balloon kyphoplasty for Kienböck's disease; Mason Type 2 radial head fractures; local infiltration and intravenous regional anaesthesia for endoscopic carpal tunnel release; perilunate injuries; and replanting the amputated fingertip.

Salvage of Failed Resection Arthroplasties of the Distal Radioulnar Joint Using an Ulnar Head Prosthesis: Long-term Results

The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis for painful instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) following resection of the ulnar head. Twenty-three patients were treated with a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis in 3 international hand centers. One patient was excluded from the study because a septic prosthesis had to be removed after 3 months. Sixteen of the remaining 22 patients could be assessed at 2 follow-up times, 28 months (range, 10-43 mo) and 11 years and 2 months (range, 97-158 mo) after surgery, for DRUJ stability, forearm rotation, grip strength, pain level (0-10), and satisfaction (0-10). Standardized radiographs of the wrist were evaluated for displacement of the ulnar head and loosening or bony reactions at the sigmoid notch or the ulna shaft. All patients demonstrated a clinically stable DRUJ at the latest examination, and no patient required further surgery at the DRUJ since the short-term evaluation in 1999. Average pain measured 3.7 before surgery, 1.7 at the short-term follow-up, and 1.7 at the long-term follow-up; patients' satisfaction, 2.2, 8.2, and 8.9; pronation, 73°, 86°, and 83°; supination, 52°, 77°, and 81°; and grip strength, 42%, 72%, and 81% of the unaffected side. All clinical parameters improved significantly from before surgery to the short-term follow-up, with no further statistically significant change between the short-term and long-term follow-up. Radiographs demonstrated no signs of stem loosening or incongruity of the DRUJ. The previously reported short-term results with the Herbert prosthesis did not deteriorate in the long term. Reconstruction of the DRUJ with this prosthesis in painful radioulnar impingement following ulnar head resection is a reliable and reproducible procedure with lasting results.

Treatment of post-traumatic degenerative changes of the radio-carpal and distal radio-ulnar joints by combining radius, scaphoid, and lunate (RSL) fusion with ulnar head replacement

Distal radial fractures are a common type of fracture. In the case of intra-articular fractures, they often result in post-traumatic arthrosis. The objective of this study is to describe a novel alternative to the established salvage techniques for the treatment of post-traumatic arthrosis of the radio-carpal and distal radio-ulnar joints (DRUJ). Six patients with radio-carpal and DRUJ arthrosis were treated with a combined radius, scaphoid, and lunate (RSL) arthrodesis and as a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis. Follow-up consisted of both radiographic and functional assessments. Functional measurements were noted both pre- and postoperatively. No non-union or pseudoarthrosis was seen; neither did any of the ulnar head prostheses show loosening. Clinical examination showed an improvement in strength, pain, and range of movement, as well as a decrease in disability. Combining RSL arthrodesis with a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis, which deals with pain while retaining partial wrist movement, can be an alternative to established salvage procedures.

Biomechanical evaluation of the dynamic radioulnar convergence after ulnar head resection, two soft tissue stabilization methods of the distal ulna and ulnar head prosthesis implantation

The biomechanical performance of the Darrach procedure, its stabilizing methods and the effectiveness of an ulnar head prosthesis was evaluated in this experiment. The purpose of this study was to: (1) analyze the dynamic effects of the resection of the distal ulna on radioulnar convergence; and (2) evaluate the mechanical performance of two soft tissue stabilizing procedures (pronator quadratus advancement flap and ECU/FCU tenodesis) for the unstable distal ulnar stump and the implantation of an ulnar head prosthesis (uHead) following a distal ulnar resection (Darrach procedure) on radioulnar convergence. With a dynamic PC-controlled forearm simulator, cadaveric forearm rotation was actively and passively performed while simultaneously loading the relevant muscles. The resultant total forearm torque and the three-dimensional kinematics of the ulna, radius and third metacarpal were simultaneously recorded in seven fresh-frozen cadaver upper extremities. The resection of the distal ulna created an extreme instability of the forearm with movement of the radius toward the ulna (0.92-0.38 cm compared to the intact state) in each particular loading condition. The implantation of the ulnar head prosthesis effectively restored the stability of the DRUJ by simulating the geometry of the ulnar head. There were significantly better results after the implantation of the prosthesis compared with the Darrach and the soft tissue stabilization procedures. This study provides laboratory validity to the option of implanting an ulnar head endoprosthesis as an attempt to stabilize the distal forearm with instability after Darrach resection in lieu of performing soft tissue stabilization techniques.

Salvage of Failed Resection Arthroplasties of the Distal Radioulnar Joint using an Ulnar Head Prosthesis – Long Term Results: Level 4 Evidence

Salvage of Failed Resection Arthroplasties of the Distal Radioulnar Joint using an Ulnar Head Prosthesis – Long Term Results: Level 4 Evidence

Isoelastic Distal Ulnar Head Prosthesis: An In Vitro Joint Simulator Study

A prosthetic ulnar head that matches the mechanical properties of the sigmoid notch of the radius may produce a superior clinical outcome. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of an ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) ulnar head prosthesis as a bearing material and compared the tribology (wear properties) with that of a cobalt chrome (CoCr) distal ulnar replacement. We compared the friction properties, termed lubricity of the UHMWPE ulnar head prosthesis and polished CoCr ulnar head in an in vitro joint simulator with physiologic saline maintained at body temperature. Wear of the UHMWPE ulnar head and polished CoCr ulnar head against a synthetic bone counterface for 1 million cycles was simulated in the in vitro joint simulator. Finally, we studied the fatigue of the UHMWPE prosthesis for 3.1 million cycles of cyclic loading. Both the fatigued and nonfatigued surface were studied with thermal analysis to characterize the UHMWPE prosthesis. The dynamic coefficient of friction for the UHMWPE prosthesis was 0.087 +/- 0.016 and was not significantly different from the polished CoCr coefficient. The synthetic counterface bone wear was 45 times less for the UHMWPE ulnar head prosthesis compared with the polished CoCr head. Both the thermal properties and the viscoelastic moduli for the fatigued UHMWPE remained unchanged compared with unloaded specimens. Ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene is a low-friction material with stable fatigue properties. In addition, in light of its low modulus of elasticity, the UHMWPE ulnar head prosthesis demonstrated low synthetic bone counterface wear compared with the polished cobalt chrome alloy prosthesis. In vitro joint simulation showed that there is a potential role for the UHMWPE ulnar head prosthesis in distal radioulnar joint prosthetic arthroplasty.

Case report: Revision of failed Sauvé-Kapandji procedure with an ulnar head prosthesis

The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure has been developed in order to solve distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) disorders. Postoperative results are variable. Complications such as painful ulnar stump, ulnar instability and loss of grip strength have often been described. We report the case of a painful ulnar stump instability resulting from a Sauvé-Kapandji procedure. After several attempted salvage procedures, a custom-made Herbert distal ulnar head prosthesis was implanted. Long-term results showed complete pain relief, improvement of the range of motion and satisfactory grip strength recovery. Our findings confirm that the Herbert custom-made ulnar head prosthesis appear to be a reliable salvage solution for failed Sauvé-Kapandji procedures.

Ulnar Head Replacement

Recent years have seen an increasing awareness of the anatomical and biomechanical significance of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). With this has come a more critical approach to surgical management of DRUJ disorders and a realization that all forms of "excision arthroplasty" can only restore forearm rotation at the expense of forearm stability. This, in turn, has led to renewed interest in prosthetic replacement of the ulnar head, a procedure that had previously fallen into disrepute because of material failures with early implants, in particular, the Swanson silicone ulnar head replacement. In response to these early failures, a new prosthesis was developed in the early 1990s, using materials designed to withstand the loads across the DRUJ associated with normal functional use of the upper limb. Released onto the market in 1995 (Herbert ulnar head prosthesis), clinical experience during the last 10 years has shown that this prosthesis is able to restore forearm function after ulnar head excision and that the materials (ceramic head and noncemented titanium stem), even with normal use of the limb, are showing no signs of failure in the medium to long term. As experience with the use of an ulnar head prosthesis grows, so does its acceptance as a viable and attractive alternative to more traditional operations, such as the Darrach and Sauve-Kapandji procedures. This article discusses the current indications and contraindications for ulnar head replacement and details the surgical procedure, rehabilitation, and likely outcomes.

Treatment of Failed Sauvé-Kapandji Procedures with a Spherical Ulnar Head Prosthesis

Treatment of Failed Sauvé-Kapandji Procedures with a Spherical Ulnar Head Prosthesis