Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears Research Articles

Overarm Training Tolerance: A Pilot Study on the Use of Muscle Oxygen Saturation as a Biomarker.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears occur due to the prolonged exposure and overworking of joint stresses, resulting in decreased strength in the flexion and extension of the elbow. Current rehabilitation approaches for UCL tears involve subjective assessments (pain scales) and objective measures such as monitoring joint angles and range of motion. The main goal of this study is to find out if using wearable near-infrared spectroscopy technology can help measure digital biomarkers like muscle oxygen levels and heart rate. These measurements could then be applied to athletes who have been injured. Specifically, measuring muscle oxygen levels will help us understand how well the muscles are using oxygen. This can indicate improvements in how the muscles are healing and growing new blood vessels after reconstructive surgery. Previous research studies demonstrated that there remains an unmet clinical need to measure biomarkers to provide continuous, internal data on muscle physiology during the rehabilitation process. This study's findings can benefit team physicians, sports scientists, athletic trainers, and athletes in the identification of biomarkers to assist in clinical decisions for optimizing training regimens for athletes that perform overarm movements; the research suggests pathways for possible earlier detection, and thus earlier intervention for injury prevention.

Changes in Pitch Velocity and Selection in Major League Baseball Pitchers Following the Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is a soft-tissue stabilizer of the elbow, that is commonly injured among baseball pitchers due to excess valgus stress in overheadthrowing motions. The location of a UCL tear typically ranges from the central aspect of the ligamentto an avulsion-type injury at its proximal insertion site on the medialepicondyle of the humerus, or its distal insertion site on the ulna. The effect of UCL reconstruction on pitching performance has become a well-studied topic in medical literature. In our study, we aimed to identify general performance patterns amongst those having undergone UCL reconstruction surgery. Data for patients with UCL reconstruction performed between 2010 and 2020 were extracted from publicly available databases. Pitching data was extracted from Brooks Baseball, a publicly available database for Major League Baseball (MLB) player statistics. We identified patients who played at least one full season after surgery and rehabilitation. Patient characteristics were evaluated for intergroup differences. Of 109 patients with UCL reconstruction, 87 were included in the final analysis. Compared to the preoperative group, the average postoperative fastball usage rate was less despite there being an increase in the off-speed usage rate. Velocity analysis demonstrated shifts of less than 1% for all three pitch groups compared to preoperative velocity average values (all P-values <0.05). Earned Run Average (ERA)+demonstrates a decrease in the postoperative group; this finding was not significant (P=0.61). Patients treated surgically demonstrated a throwing tendency for theirsecondary and tertiary pitches and a decreased usage of fastballs. Further studies areneeded to explore the factors contributing to the change in pitching performance.

Ulnar collateral ligament repair in professional baseball players

Background: While initial reports of surgical repair of ulnar collateral ligament tears are promising, studies detailing post-repair outcomes are lacking. This study explores the effectiveness of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair in returning professional baseball players to their pre-injury level of play. Our hypothesis is that professional baseball players undergoing UCL repair will have successful outcomes and high return to sport rates after surgery.Methods: Publicly available databases were utilized to search for data on professional baseball players who underwent UCL repair from 2016 to 2021. Players undergoing primary UCL repair with an internal brace were included. Amateur players were excluded as were those undergoing revision UCL repair or UCL reconstruction. Results: Of the 11 pitchers who underwent UCL repair, minor league baseball (MiLB) pitchers returned to the sport at an average of 17.5 months. MiLB pitchers had similar earned run averages (ERAs), games played, innings pitched, and walks plus hits per inning pitched ratios (WHIPs) before and after surgery. Four major league baseball (MLB) pitchers (80%) returned to the sport at 9.55 months. MLB pitchers played fewer games and pitched fewer innings than before the surgery, but their ERAs and WHIPs were similar before and after surgery. Pitch velocity and spin rates after surgery varied based on pitch type. The seven positional players who underwent UCL repair showed no differences in batting or fielding performance before and after surgery.Conclusions: UCL repair can successfully return both pitchers and positional players at both the MiLB and MLB levels to play at pre-injury performance levels. Repair can be considered as an option for qualifying injuries in players hoping to maximize performance after surgery with minimal recovery time.Level of Evidence: IV.

New Diagnostic-Based Systematic Classification for Skier's Thumb Injuries: A Revision That is Needed

Abstract Background Acute injuries to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the first metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPj), commonly referred to as Skier’s thumb injuries, can be further categorized into different types based on bone lesions and joint instability. However, none of the existing classifications encompasses all types and combinations of injuries. A unified classification system that provides direct treatment recommendations for each type is required, particularly for cases with no clear indications. Aims To develop a new classification system for acute UCL injuries of the first MCPj that comprehensively defines all possible combinations and types of injuries and facilitates treatment decision-making for each specific type in daily clinical practice. Methods The retrospective study included patients with acute UCL lesions who underwent conservative or operative treatment at our clinic between 2018 and 2023. This classification addresses ligamentous or osseous lesions, fracture fragment size and dislocation, ligament configuration (e.g. Stener lesions), and joint stability. Correlated radiography, ultrasonography, MRI, and intraoperative findings were used to define all combinations and variants of skier`s thumb injuries. Pre-therapeutic joint stability was characterized according to the criteria established in the literature. Dislocation criteria for bone lesions were defined in a preliminary observer trial. The classification was applied by three hand surgeons with different training levels. Treatment applied and a 3-months follow-up was documented. Results In 213 patients with acute UCL tears, the new classification was consistently applied, and the treatment derived was largely aligned with the recommendations in the literature for both absolute and relative indications for splint or operative therapy. The vast majority of the patients were stable after 3 months. Conclusion This new classification is the first to combine the clinical and radiological aspects of skier`s thumb injuries into one classification and encompasses all variants. It is comprehensive, can be easily applied retrospectively, and provides clear treatment recommendations in most cases.

Trends in Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repairs and Reconstructions and an Analysis Between Low- and High-Volume Surgical Centers: A 10-Year Study in New York State.

Elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) is the gold standard for operative treatment of UCL tears, with renewed interest in UCL repairs. To (1) assess trends in rates of UCLR and UCL repair and (2) identify predictors of complications by demographic, socioeconomic, or surgical center volume factors. Descriptive epidemiology study. Patients who underwent UCLR or UCL repair at New York State health care facilities between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively identified; concomitant ulnar nerve procedures among the cohort were also identified. Surgical center volumes were classified as low (<99th percentile) or high (≥99th percentile). Patient information, neighborhood socioeconomic status quantified using the Area Deprivation Index, and complications within 90 days were recorded. Poisson regression analysis was used to compare trends in UCLR versus UCL repair. Multivariable regression was used to determine whether center volume, demographic, or socioeconomic variables were independent predictors of complications. A total of 1448 UCL surgeries were performed, with 388 (26.8%) concomitant ulnar nerve procedures. UCLR (1084 procedures; 74.9%) was performed more commonly than UCL repair (364 procedures; 25.1%), with patients undergoing UCL repair more likely to be older, female, and not privately ensured and having undergone a concomitant ulnar nerve procedure (all P < .001). With each year, there was an increased incidence rate ratio for UCL repair versus UCLR (β = 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02-1.23]; P = .022). The authors identified 2 high-volume centers (720 UCL procedures; 49.7%) and 131 low-volume centers (728 UCL procedures; 50.3%). Patients undergoing UCL procedures at high-volume centers were more likely to be younger and male and receive workers' compensation (all P < .001). UCL repair and ulnar nerve-related procedures were both more commonly performed at low-volume centers (P < .001). There were no significant differences in 3-month infection, ulnar neuritis, instability, arthrofibrosis, heterotopic ossification, or all-cause complication rates between low- and high-volume centers. The only significant predictor for all-cause complication was Medicaid insurance (OR, 2.91 [95% CI, 1.20-6.33]; P = .011). A rising incidence of UCL repair compared with UCLR was found in New York State, especially among female patients, older patients, and nonprivate payers. There were no differences in 3-month complication rates between high- and low-volume centers, and Medicaid insurance status was a predictor for overall complications within 90 days of operation.

A systematic review of the outcomes of partial ulnar collateral ligament tears of the elbow in athletes treated non-operatively with platelet-rich plasma injection

Background This study aimed to analyze the effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for partial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears in athletes and predicted positive outcomes. Methods The researchers systematically reviewed the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies with clinical outcomes of PRP for partial UCL tears. They excluded studies that did not stratify data by tear type or included surgical management. Results Five studies with 156 patients were included. The timing, amount, platelet concentration, type, and number of PRP injections were highly variable among the studies. However, 75% (n = 97/127) of athletes returned to sport (RTS) at a weighted average of 82.1 days (37–84) after PRP injection. One study showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Two studies showed positive outcomes in the modified Conway scale, complete reconstitution of the UCL in 87% of patients on MRI, and significant improvement in the humeral-ulnar joint space after PRP injection via ultrasound. The Coleman methodology score (CMS) averaged 48/100, indicating an overall poor quality of evidence. Conclusion This review demonstrates favorable RTS, clinical, and radiographic outcomes in patients receiving PRP for partial UCL tears, but the literature remains heterogeneous and of low quality. Level of Evidence III

Management of ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball athletes: An online survey in Japanese surgeons

BackgroundThe management of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries widely varies among surgeons. Although various treatment options have been proposed including surgical and conservative treatments, no golden standard treatment strategy has been established of yet. The American survey reported an overall experienced and well-trained cohort of surgeons often reached consensus opinions on how to approach UCL injury. However, the consensus among Japanese surgeons on the treatment of UCL injuries remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to survey current trends among Japanese orthopaedic surgeons in the treatment of UCL injuries in baseball players. MethodsAn online survey was distributed to the active members of the Japanese doctor's network for baseball injury prevention, which was formed by partial members of the medical committee in the Japan Baseball Council. The survey was composed of three sections: demographics of the surveyees, preferred operative and nonoperative management of UCL injuries, and five fictional clinical case scenarios of baseball players with a UCL injury. ResultsThe 131 e-mailed invitations to society members yielded 78 completed online surveys with a participation rate of 60%. Sixty-four respondents (82%) reported >15 years of clinical experience. Sixty-five respondents (83%) performed ≤5 UCL reconstructions per year. As nonsurgical management of UCL injuries, seventy-four surgeons (95%) preferred physiotherapy followed by intraarticular injection (46%). For surgical management, seventy-three surgeons (93%) preferred UCL reconstruction. Of the five case scenarios, a consensus was reached in three cases: to perform surgery on the patient with full-thickness UCL tear. When operative management was the preferred option, a consensus was reached to perform UCL reconstruction. ConclusionJapanese doctors involved in the treatment of baseball injuries reached a consensus to indicate high-level athletes with a full-thickness UCL tear for surgery. When operative management was the preferred option, a consensus was reached to perform UCL reconstruction. These results may contribute to the decision-making for managing UCL injuries.

The Utility of Stress Ultrasound in Identifying Risk Factors for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear: A Longitudinal Study of 203 Professional Baseball Players

Background: Injuries to the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are common among baseball pitchers due to repetitive stress on the soft tissue stabilizers of the elbow during pitching. Dynamic stress ultrasound (SUS) can be used to evaluate the UCL and ulnohumeral joint to identify anatomic risk factors of those who will require UCL reconstruction (UCLR). Purpose: To determine whether any adaptive or morphological changes detectable on SUS can predict injury to the UCL in professional baseball pitchers. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 203 professional baseball pitchers who underwent SUS at preseason training sessions over the course of 18 years were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: those without a history of shoulder, arm, elbow, or forearm surgery or injuries (healthy cohort; n = 184) and those who underwent UCLR the same season as SUS (UCLR cohort; n = 19). Ligament thickness, joint spacing, and laxity were compared. An additional matched cohort analysis was conducted using 10 players from each group to detect differences in the progression of UCL and ulnohumeral joint measures in the year before injury. Results: The UCLR cohort, when compared with the healthy cohort, had higher relative (ie, nondominant-side measurements subtracted from dominant-side measurements) resting ulnohumeral joint space (median, 0.50 vs 0.20 mm, respectively; P = .006) and higher rates of hypoechoic foci (57.9% vs 30.4%, respectively; P = .030). Players of both groups had similar dominant UCL thickness (P = .161), ulnohumeral joint space at rest (P = .321), space under stress (P = .498), and laxity (P = .796). Groups did not differ in terms of relative UCL thickness, ulnohumeral joint space under stress, or relative laxity. In the year before UCL injury, the UCLR cohort, compared with the matched healthy cohort, had a greater increase in mean dominant UCL thickness (0.94 vs –0.60 mm, respectively; P = .038) and a greater increase in relative median UCL thickness (1.35 vs –0.35 mm, respectively; P = .045). Players in the healthy cohort were statistically older than those in the UCLR cohort (23 vs 22 years, respectively; P = .004). No differences in ulnohumeral stress spacing or laxity were detected. Conclusion: SUS of players who underwent UCLR demonstrated a progressive increase in UCL thickness over 1 year, higher rates of hypoechoic foci, and increased ulnohumeral rest space compared with SUS of uninjured players.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Treated With and Without Augmentation: A Network Meta-analysis of Controlled Laboratory Studies

Background: Treatment of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears with suture tape augmentation has gained interest given preliminary reports of favorable biomechanical characteristics. No study to date has quantitatively assessed the biomechanical effects of multiple augmentation techniques relative to the native UCL. Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled laboratory studies to assess and comparatively rank biomechanical effects of UCL repair or reconstruction with or without augmentation. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in January 2023. A frequentist network meta-analytic approach was used to perform mixed-treatment comparisons of UCL repair and reconstruction techniques with and without augmentation, with the native UCL as the reference condition. Pooled treatment estimates were quantified under the random-effects assumption. Competing treatments were ranked in the network meta-analysis by using point estimates and standard errors to calculate P scores (greater P score indicates superiority of treatment for given outcome). Results: Ten studies involving 206 elbow specimens in which a distal UCL tear was simulated were included. UCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation (AugRecon) restored load to failure to a statistically noninferior magnitude (mean difference [MD], –1.99 N·m; 95% CI, –10.2 to 6.2 N·m; P = .63) compared with the native UCL. UCL reconstruction (Recon) (MD, –12.7 N·m; P < .001) and UCL repair with suture tape augmentation (AugRepair) (MD, –14.8 N·m; P < .001) were both statistically inferior to the native UCL. The AugRecon condition conferred greater load to failure compared with Recon (P < .001) and AugRepair (P = .002) conditions. AugRecon conferred greater torsional stiffness relative to all other conditions and was not statistically different from the native UCL (MD, 0.32 N·m/deg; 95% CI, –0.30 to 0.95 N·m/deg; P = .31). Medial ulnohumeral gapping was not statistically different for the AugRepair (MD, 0.30 mm; 95% CI, –1.22 to 1.82 mm; P = .70), AugRecon (MD, 0.57 mm; 95% CI, –0.70 to 1.84 mm; P = .38), or Recon (MD, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, –0.02 to 2.05 mm; P = .055) conditions compared with the native UCL. P-score analysis indicated that AugRecon was the most effective treatment for increasing ultimate load to failure and torsional stiffness, whereas AugRepair was the most effective for minimizing medial gapping. Conclusion: AugRecon restored load to failure and torsional stiffness most similar to the parameters of the native UCL, whereas Recon and AugRepair did not restore the same advantageous properties at time zero. Medial ulnohumeral gapping during a valgus load was minimized by all 3 treatments. Based on network interactions, AugRecon was the superior treatment approach for restoring important biomechanical features of the UCL at time zero that are jeopardized during a complete distal tear.

Analysis of patient-directed search content and online resource quality for ulnar collateral ligament injury and surgery

Patients use the Internet to learn information about injuries, yet online content remains largely unstudied. This study analyzed patient questions posed online regarding ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears or UCL surgical management. Three separate search strings about UCL tear and UCL surgery were queried on the Google search engine. The 300 most commonly asked questions were compiled for each topic and associated webpage information was collected from the "People also ask" section. Questions were categorized using the Rothwell classification and webpages by Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. The most frequent UCL tear questions were "how long does it take to heal a torn UCL?" and "what is nonsurgical treatment for the UCL?" The most frequent UCL surgery question was "can you retear your UCL after surgery?" The Rothwell classification of questions for UCL tear/UCL surgery was 55%/32% policy, 38%/57% fact, and 7%/11% value with highest subcategories being indications/management (46%/25%) and technical details (24%/25%). The most common webpages were academic (39%/29%) and medical practice (24%/26%). Mean JAMA score for all 600 webpages was low (1.2), with journals (mean=3.4) having the highest score. Medical practice (mean=0.5) and legal websites (mean=0.0) had the lowest JAMA scores. Only 30% of webpages provided UCL-specific information. Online UCL patient questions commonly pertain to technical details and injury management. Webpages suggested by search engines contain information specific to UCL tears and surgery only one-third of the time. The quality of most webpages provided to patients is poor, with minimal source transparency.

Reliability of ulnar collateral ligament findings in magnetic resonance imaging.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are common in baseball players. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most used imaging modality for UCL injuries, the inter-rater reliability of MRI analyzing specific characteristics of UCL pathology has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to define the inter-rater reliability of MRI for evaluating UCL characteristics. Three surgeons analyzed 45 noncontrast MRIs: 15 without UCL tears, 15 with intraoperatively confirmed partial-thickness tears, and 15 with intraoperatively confirmed full-thickness tears. Findings evaluated included ligament characteristics (periligamentous or osseous edema, ligament hypertrophy, calcifications, and partial- or full-thickness tearing) and location of the pathology (proximal, midsubstance, or distal). Fleiss' κ coefficients were used to assess interobserver reliability. There were high rates of agreement for midsubstance (κ: 0.50) and distal (κ: 0.69) ligament edema and proximal osseous edema (κ: 0.48). There were low rates of agreement for proximal ligament edema (κ: 0.08), ligament thickening (κ: -0.02 to 0.20), and proximal to midsubstance calcifications (κ: -0.04 to 0.10). Midsubstance (κ: 0.55) and distal full-thickness tears (κ: 0.63) demonstrated higher agreement than proximal (κ: 0.29). Proximal partial-thickness tears (κ: 0.45) had higher agreement than midsubstance (κ: -0.02) or distal (κ: -0.02). In our study, there was high inter-rater reliability regarding proximal osseous edema, midsubstance, and distal ligament edema and full-thickness tears. There was no agreement for midsubstance and distal partial-thickness UCL tears, but fair agreement for proximal tears. UCL tissue characteristics including ligament thickening and calcifications demonstrated low agreement. Challenges remain in effectively evaluating UCL tissue characteristics on noncontrast MRIs.

In Vivo Effect of Partial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear Location on Ulnohumeral Joint Gapping With Stress Ultrasound in Baseball Pitchers

Background: Stress ultrasonography (SUS) has provided clinicians with an alternative means of evaluating ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury by dynamically assessing ulnohumeral joint space gapping under applied valgus stress. However, 3 previous cadaveric studies have evaluated the biomechanical effect of partial UCL tears at different anatomic locations with conflicting results. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to use in vivo data from patients with magnetic resonance (MR)–confirmed partial UCL tears to determine if anatomic partial tear location influenced the resultant stability of the elbow in terms of ulnohumeral joint gapping on SUS. It was hypothesized that no difference would be seen in the amount of ulnohumeral joint gapping based on MR-identified anatomic partial UCL tear location. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients diagnosed with elbow injury from 2015 to 2020 were screened to identify competitive baseball pitchers with a partial UCL tear who received an SUS. Partial UCL tear was diagnosed via surgeon and radiologist interpretation of elbow MR imaging (MRI) as well as confirmation at the time of surgery as documented in the operative report. Demographic, injury, and treatment data were collected from the clinic notes, MRI reports, and stress ultrasound reports. Ulnohumeral joint gapping on SUS was calculated as the difference between ulnohumeral joint gapping without valgus stress versus ulnohumeral joint gapping with valgus stress (delta) as performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Results: Overall, 60 male baseball pitchers (age, 19.2 ± 2.1 years), including 22 (37%) high school, 26 (43%) collegiate, and 12 (20%) professional pitchers, were evaluated. Regarding the location of partial UCL tears, 32 (53%) pitchers had proximal tears and 28 (47%) had distal tears. The mean delta value cohort was 2.1 ± 1.1 mm, and 34 pitchers (57%) had delta values >2.0 mm. Ulnohumeral joint gapping (high school [1.9 mm] vs collegiate [2.6 mm] vs professional [1.6 mm]; P = .004) and the percentage of pitchers with delta values >2.0 mm (45% vs 77% vs 33%; P = .017) differed based on level of competition. After controlling for age, body mass index, and level of competition in a multivariate linear regression, tear location was not related to ulnohumeral joint gapping (P = .499). Conclusion: No difference was observed in the amount of ulnohumeral joint gapping on SUS in symptomatic baseball pitchers with MR-identified partial UCL tears at differing anatomic locations. The findings of this study are contrary to previous cadaveric studies that have evaluated the effects of UCL tear characteristics on delta laxity.

Poster 206: What are the Indications for Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Baseball Players? An MRI Case-based Study

Objectives: Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) tears are common in baseball players. When non-operative management fails; reconstruction or repair may be necessary to restore physical function. There is no clear consensus regarding the indications for surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tear characteristics, or the indications for selecting repair over reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to define the indications for UCL surgery based on MRI and to elucidate indications for UCL repair vs reconstruction. Methods: Twenty-six orthopaedic surgeons who treat baseball players were surveyed. Forty-five MRIs were reviewed: 15 without UCL tears, 15 with intra-operatively confirmed partial-thickness tears, and 15 with full-thickness tears. Factors investigated included ligament characteristics (peri-ligamentous or osseous edema, ligament hypertrophy, calcification, partial or full-thickness tearing) and location (proximal, mid-substance, or distal). Surgeons were given a clinical scenario and asked whether 1) surgery was indicated and 2) whether repair or reconstruction was recommended. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) helped identify significant predictors for both queries. Results: The odds of recommending surgical treatment compared to non-operative treatment were 2.4x more likely for a proximal partial-thickness tear, 3.2x for distal partial-thickness tear, 5.1x for distal full- thickness tear, and 7.0x for proximal full-thickness tear (p&lt;0.001). Significant indications for repair included distal partial (OR=1.6, 95%CI 1.0, 2.1, p&lt;0.001) and full-thickness tears (OR=1.7, 95%CI 1.1, 2.3, p&lt;0.001). Repair was 3x less likely recommended for mid-substance full-thickness tears (OR=3.0, 95%CI - 5.0, -1.0, p=0.004). Ultrasound stress testing was requested in 78% of partial tears. Conclusions: Among surgeons surveyed, the highest odds for recommending operative treatment were proximal full-thickness tears, then distal full-thickness, distal partial-thickness, and proximal partial- thickness tears. Repair was most appropriate for partial and full-thickness distal tears, but relatively contraindicated for complete mid-substance UCL tears. Ultrasound stress testing was frequently requested for partial tears. Given the lack of consensus among surgeons, future prospective registries are necessary to determine whether these factors associate with clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]

Factors Important to Patient Decision-Making After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury in Competitive High School and Collegiate Baseball Players.

Patients are faced with several treatment decisions after an ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury: nonoperative versus operative treatment, repair versus reconstruction, and immediate versus delayed surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors important to patients when deciding which treatment to pursue after a UCL injury. We hypothesized that (1) length of time away from sports and seasonal timing would be important to patients and (2) treatment decision-making would be heavily influenced by how many and which seasons of their baseball career would be missed. Cross-sectional study. High school and collegiate baseball players with UCL tears treated at an academic institution were surveyed retrospectively on their sports participation at the time of injury and their UCL injury treatment decisions. Respondents rated the influence of various factors on a 5-point Likert scale, and they selected the top 3 factors and the single most important factor influencing their treatment decisions. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between player characteristics and factors important to their treatment decision. A total of 83 athletes completed the survey; 40 were in high school and 43 were in college at the time of injury; 7 were treated nonoperatively and 76 underwent surgery (66 immediately and 10 in a delayed fashion), 10 with UCL repair and 66 with UCL reconstruction. The ability to play competitive baseball in the long term was very important or extremely important to 90% of players, while the ability to play in the short term was very important or extremely important to 17%. Length of recovery and seasonal timing were also important factors for 53% and 54% of players, respectively, and almost all (90%) highly valued advice from a surgeon. Possible failure of nonoperative treatment leading to increased time away and the possible loss of 2 consecutive baseball seasons heavily influenced decision-making in 41% of respondents. Survey respondents were driven by the desire to play baseball in the long term. Treatment decisions were influenced by the length of recovery and by the seasonal timing of their injury, both of which affect how many and which seasons of baseball a player may miss. Patients found advice from their surgeon to be extremely important to decision-making.

Paper 21: Functional Outcomes of Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair with Internal Bracing in Athletes

Objectives: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary restraint to valgus stress in the elbow. Injury to this ligament can occur in the setting of acute trauma as well as chronic overuse as seen in baseball players and other overhead athletes. Injury to the UCL continues to be a major source of morbidity in overhead-throwing athletes, with the incidence of UCL tears increasing dramatically over the past 15 years. UCL reconstruction using palmaris longus or hamstring autograft (also known as Tommy John surgery) has been considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of symptomatic UCL injuries in overhead athletes for decades. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in UCL repair. In 2016, Dugas et al described the novel use of a collagen-dipped internal brace to augment UCL repair with encouraging biomechanical results from a cadaveric study. To date, only two studies have reported outcomes for this novel approach to UCL repair with internal brace (IB) augmentation, both with encouraging results. It is thought that the main advantages of UCL repair with IB augmentation compared to UCL reconstruction are comparable return to sport rates with a more rapid postoperative recovery, as well as restoration of normal anatomy that eliminates the need for an autograft and the associated complications of graft harvesting. Given the paucity of data examining this new surgical approach, this study seeks to add clinical outcome data for UCL repair to the scientific literature. The goal of this project is to evaluate functional outcomes following primary ulnar collateral ligament repair using internal brace augmentation and to describe new advancements in the surgical technique for this procedure. Methods: Approval was obtained from the Columbia University Irving Medical Center Institutional Review Board. A retrospective review of the electronic medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent medial UCL repair with internal brace augmentation between 2016 and 2022 was performed. All procedures were performed at a single tertiary institution and all patients were under the direct medical care of the senior author. Only patients with a focal UCL injury, such as a distal or proximal avulsion tear, were selected for UCL repair with internal brace augmentation. Evidence of chronic attritional disease, including calcification on MRI, or extensive ligamentous injury were contraindications to UCL repair. Additionally, only patients undergoing primary UCL repair with internal brace augmentation were included; those with prior UCL reconstructions or repairs were excluded as were patients with insufficient clinical follow-up data. Included in the chart review were patient demographics, level of sport, injury characteristics, preoperative imaging findings, operative data, and postoperative clinical outcomes including complications and reoperations. Patient reported outcomes were collected from the Pitch Registry, a national database maintained by Major League Baseball (MLB). Primary outcomes for this study include the ability to return to play (RTP) at the same previous level or higher, the time to return to competition, complications, and reoperations. Results: A total of 56 patients were included in this study (mean age at surgery was 19.5 ± 4.5 years; 55 men and 1 woman). The majority were baseball players (n=52) of which 43 were pitchers, while the remaining athletes played football, wrestled, or competed in Jujitsu. Twenty-eight were high school athletes, 23 played at the collegiate level, 4 played recreationally, and 1 played professionally. Symptoms of UCL injury preceded surgery by an average of 7.5 ± 15.0 months. The UCL was partially torn in 39 patients and fully torn in the remaining 17 patients, and it was torn proximally in 18, distally in 37, and mid-substance in 1 patient. The mean preoperative Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score was 61.5 ± 15.3, the mean preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 71.6 ± 14.9, and the mean preoperative Youth Throwing Score (YTS) was 40 ± 14. A concomitant arthroscopic osteophyte debridement and synovectomy was performed in 10 cases and a concomitant ulnar nerve transposition was performed in 4 cases. There were no intra-operative complications. The mean length of follow-up was 12.1 ± 7.1 months. Of the total cohort, 51 (91.0%) patients were able to return to play at an average of 7.8 ± 2.4 months. There were 4 reoperations (7.1%) including a single revision UCL reconstruction, 2 ulnar nerve transpositions, and 1 arthroscopic osteophyte debridement. Conclusions: Primary UCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a viable alternative to UCL reconstruction as supported by a rapid return to play and a low complication rate. There remains a paucity of data examining this encouraging and novel surgical approach. Additional data and analysis examining functional outcomes and optimal patient selection will be critical to address the rising epidemic of UCL injuries in young athletes.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Function After Surgical Repair of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Thumb

The purpose of this study was to report prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes of patients who underwent open thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair and to find risk factors associated with poor patient-reported outcomes. Patients undergoing open surgical repair for a complete thumb UCL rupture were included between December 2011 and February 2021. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) total scores at baseline were compared to MHQ total scores at three and 12 months after surgery. Associations between the 12-month MHQ total score and several variables (i.e., sex, injury to surgery time, K-wire immobilization) were analyzed. Seventy-six patients were included. From baseline to three and 12 months after surgery, patients improved significantly with a mean MHQ total score of 65 (standard deviation [SD] 15) to 78 (SD 14) and 87 (SD 12), respectively. We did not find any differences in outcomes between patients who underwent surgery in the acute (<3 weeks) setting compared to a delayed setting (<6 months). We found that patient-reported outcomes improve significantly at three and 12 months after open surgical repair of the thumb UCL compared to baseline. We did not find an association between injury to surgery time and lower MHQ total scores. This suggests that acute repair for full-thickness UCL tears might not always be necessary. Therapeutic II.

What are the indications for medial ulnar collateral ligament surgery in baseball players? An MRI case-based study.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are common in baseball players. When nonoperative management fails; reconstruction or repair may be necessary to restore physical function. There is no clear consensus regarding the indications for surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tear characteristics or the indications for selecting repair over reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to define the indications for UCL surgery based on MRI and to elucidate indications for UCL repair vs. reconstruction. Twenty-six orthopedic surgeons who treat baseball players were surveyed. Forty-five MRIs were reviewed: 15 without UCL tears, 15 with intraoperatively confirmed partial-thickness tears, and 15 with full-thickness tears. Factors investigated included ligament characteristics (periligamentous or osseous edema, ligament hypertrophy, calcification, partial or full-thickness tearing) and location (proximal, midsubstance, or distal). Surgeons were given a clinical scenario and asked whether 1) surgery was indicated and 2) whether repair or reconstruction was recommended. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) helped identify significant predictors for both queries. The odds of recommending surgical treatment compared to nonoperative treatment were 2.4× more likely for a proximal partial-thickness tear, 3.2× for distal partial-thickness tear, 5.1× for distal full-thickness tear, and 7.0× for proximal full-thickness tear (P<.001). Significant indications for repair included distal partial (OR=1.6, 95% CI 1.0, 2.1, P<.001) and full-thickness tears (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.1, 2.3, P<.001). Repair was 3× less likely recommended for midsubstance full-thickness tears (OR=3.0, 95% CI -5.0, -1.0, P=.004). Ultrasound stress testing was requested in 78% of partial tears. Among surgeons surveyed, the highest odds for recommending operative treatment were proximal full-thickness tears, then distal full-thickness, distal partial-thickness, and proximal partial-thickness tears. Repair was most appropriate for partial and full-thickness distal tears, but relatively contraindicated for complete midsubstance UCL tears. Ultrasound stress testing was frequently requested for partial tears. Given the lack of consensus among surgeons, future prospective registries are necessary to determine whether these factors associate with clinical outcomes.

Does Prehabilitation Before Surgery Affect Return to Sport in Baseball Pitchers With Partial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears?

Purposeful rehabilitation before surgery (prehabilitation) has been researched and implemented in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tears. However, it is unclear whether prehabilitation would affect outcomes for baseball pitchers with partial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears. The purpose of this study was to determine whether baseball pitchers with partial UCL tears who completed ≥4 weeks of prehabilitation (prehab group) have different return to play (RTP) outcomes than pitchers with 0 to 3 weeks of preoperative physical therapy (no prehab group). We hypothesized that pitchers in the prehab group would have similar RTP rates compared with pitchers in the no prehab group. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Baseball pitchers of all competitive levels who underwent primary UCL reconstruction (UCLR) or UCL repair between 2010 and 2019 were included. Physician chart notes, magnetic resonance images, and operative notes were screened to confirm primary UCLR or UCL repair of a partial UCL tear and to identify whether the nonoperative treatment had been attempted. Patients were contacted via RedCap for postoperative complications, reoperations, RTP, and patient-reported outcomes (Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, Andrews-Timmerman score, Conway-Jobe score, and satisfaction). Overall, 105 baseball pitchers (n = 55 prehab group; n = 50 no prehab group) were included and evaluated at 3.4 ± 2.5 years postoperatively. Six pitchers underwent UCL repair, and 99 pitchers underwent UCLR. All demographic characteristics were similar between groups except the prehab group received a gracilis graft more frequently (76.5% vs 51.2%; P = .038). The RTP rate (prehab [88.1%] vs no prehab [93.8%]; P = .465) was similar between groups. All other postoperative outcomes were also similar between groups, including revision rates and patient-reported outcomes. Postoperative and patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between pitchers with partial UCL tears who performed rehabilitation before UCL surgery and pitchers who did not attempt a significant period of rehabilitation before UCL surgery. Clinicians should feel comfortable recommending rehabilitation for patients with partial UCL tears who wish to attempt a period of nonoperative treatment, as postoperative outcomes are not affected if UCL surgery is later needed.

Hidden Pitches in Major League Baseball: What Are the Injury Implications of These Often Overlooked Pitches?

Pitch counts are tightly monitored in Major League Baseball (MLB). Hidden pitches-including warm-up pitches before and between innings and pitches before the starting/relieving pitcher's appearance in a game-are not as closely monitored. To report the number of hidden pitches thrown per game and over the course of a season for a single organization. We hypothesized that players who threw more hidden pitches would be at an increased risk of injury compared with those who threw fewer hidden pitches. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. All pitchers who played for a single MLB organization in the 2021 season were included. Hidden pitches, in-game pitches, and total pitches thrown during all games in the season were recorded. Injuries to these pitchers were also recorded. Players were defined as having an injury if they spent any time on the injured list. Overall, 137 pitchers were included, 66 (48%) of whom sustained an injury and were placed on the IL during the 2021 season (mean time on IL, 53.6 ± 45.6 days). Of the 66 players who sustained an injury, 18 (27.3%) sustained an elbow injury, while 12 (18.2%) sustained a shoulder injury. Only 1 player sustained an ulnar collateral ligament tear. When comparing hidden pitches, in-game pitches, and total pitches between pitchers who sustained an injury and those who did not, there were no significant differences between groups (P = .150; P = .830; and P = .377, respectively). On average, hidden pitches made up 45.4% of the total number of pitches thrown during the course of the season. When evaluating the number of hidden pitches as a percentage of the total number of pitches thrown in a season, there was no significant difference between pitchers who sustained an injury and those who did not (P = .654). MLB pitchers who sustained an injury did not throw more hidden pitches than those who did not sustain an injury. Larger scale studies are needed to confirm the results of this single-team study.

Paper 22: Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear in Elite Baseball Pitchers: Do High School Showcase Exposures Predict Injury™

Paper 22: Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear in Elite Baseball Pitchers: Do High School Showcase Exposures Predict Injury™