Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair Research Articles

Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Structural Bioinductive Scaffold: A Biomechanical Study

Background: Elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with suture brace augmentation shows good time-zero biomechanical strength and a more rapid return to play compared with UCL reconstruction. However, there are concerns about overconstraint or stress shielding with nonabsorbable suture tape. Recently, a collagen-based bioinductive absorbable structural scaffold has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for augmentation of soft tissue repair. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to assess the initial biomechanical performance of UCL repair augmented with this scaffold. We hypothesized that adding the bioinductive absorbable structural scaffold to primary UCL repair would impart additional time-zero restraint to the valgus opening. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight cadaveric elbow specimens—from midforearm to midhumerus—were utilized. In the native state, elbows underwent valgus stress testing at 30o, 60o, and 90o of flexion, with a cyclical valgus rotational torque. Changes in valgus rotation from 2- to 5-N·m torque were recorded as valgus gapping. Testing was then performed in 4 states: (1) native intact UCL—with dissection through skin, fascia, and muscle down to an intact UCL complex; (2) UCL-transected—distal transection of the ligament off the sublime tubercle; (3) augmented repair with bioinductive absorbable scaffold; and (4) repair alone without scaffold. The order of testing of repair states was alternated to account for possible plastic deformation during testing. Results: The UCL-transected state showed the greatest increase in valgus gapping of all states at all flexion angles. Repair alone showed similar valgus gapping to that of the UCL-transected state at 30° (P = .62) and 60° of flexion (P = .11). Bioinductive absorbable scaffold–augmented repair showed less valgus gapping compared with repair alone at all flexion angles (P = .021, P = .024, and P = .024 at 30°, 60°, and 90°, respectively). Scaffold-augmented repair showed greater gapping compared with the native state at 30° (P = .021) and 90° (P = .039) but not at 60° of flexion (P = .059). There was no difference when testing augmented repair or repair alone first. Conclusion: UCL repair augmented with a bioinductive, biocomposite absorbable structural scaffold imparts additional biomechanical strength to UCL repair alone, without overconstraint beyond the native state. Further comparative studies are warranted. Clinical Relevance: As augmented primary UCL repair becomes more commonly performed, use of an absorbable bioinductive scaffold may allow for improved time-zero mechanical strength, and thus more rapid rehabilitation, while avoiding long-term overconstraint or stress shielding.

Clinical outcomes after primary repair for thumb ulnar collateral ligament ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is no consensus on the best surgical technique for treating thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) ruptures. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates which primary repair technique and postoperative immobilization protocol result in the best clinical outcomes. A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline ALL Ovid, Web of Science Core Selection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Pain, stability, tip pinch strength, key pinch strength, grip strength, return to work and metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion were collected as postoperative outcomes. In total, 29 studies were included. All surgical techniques resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, with no significant differences between bone anchor reinsertion, suture fixation, K-wire fixation and a combination of techniques. K-wire immobilization resulted in worse postoperative pain, but similar stability compared to immobilization without a K-wire. Clinical outcomes after thumb UCL repair are excellent, with no differences in clinical outcomes noted among surgical techniques.

Operative Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury in Female Athletes.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction has been the standard surgical intervention for elite male athletes with UCL insufficiency. Recently, UCL repair and augmentation with an internal brace has been increasingly performed. To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes as well as return-to-sport rate after UCL repair in female athletes. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Included were 15 female athletes (mean age, 16.5 ± 3.5 years) who underwent UCL repair between 2011 and 2021 at a single institution. Data collected included age, sport played, competition level, symptom onset, previous surgeries, mechanism of injury, surgical intervention, and return to sport. Patients were contacted via phone at minimum 24-month follow-up, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Of the 15 female athletes, there were 4 cheerleaders, 3 softball players, 2 volleyball players, 2 soccer players, 1 gymnast, 1 tennis player, 1 dancer, and 1 javelin thrower. Ten of the 15 athletes (67%) competed at the high school level, 4 (26%) at the collegiate level, and 1 patient (7%) was a recreational volleyball player. In all patients, there was an acute onset of symptoms after injury. Ten patients underwent UCL repair with an internal brace (67% of athletes), while 5 underwent standard UCL repair. The median MEPS for athletes with and without an internal brace was 100 (range, 80-100). There was no significant difference of MEPS (P = .826) or SANE scores (P = .189) between the patients who received an internal brace and those who did not. Thirteen of the 15 athletes (86.7%) returned to sport. The UCL injuries in the female athletes in this study were the result of acute trauma. Primary UCL repair, both with and without internal bracing, was an effective surgical treatment for returning these athletes to sport.

Performance-Based Outcomes after Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Professional Pitchers.

To compare performance in baseball pitchers before and after revision ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery using performance metrics. Case series. Public online database. Players who underwent revision UCL surgery between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Players were included if they were Minor League (MiLB) or Major League (Major League baseball [MLB]) pitchers. Players were excluded if they were not pitchers, if they underwent their revision surgery as an amateur, or if there is no record of their primary reconstruction surgery. Revision UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction). Return to sport (RTS) rate, RTS time, pitch velocity, and pitch spin rate. Sixty-five pitchers underwent revision UCL surgery. MiLB pitchers had a shorter RTS time after their primary surgery (15.62 vs 20.77 months, P < 0.01) compared with MLB pitchers but similar RTS times after their revision reconstruction (19.64 vs 18.48 months, P = 0.44). There was also no difference in return to play (RTP) rate overall after primary versus revision reconstruction (P = 1.00). Major League baseball pitchers also had decreased RTS time after primary compared with revision reconstruction (15.62 vs 19.64 months, P < 0.01) but similar RTP rates (P = 0.28). Finally, MLB pitchers had similar pitch breakdowns, velocities, and spin rates before and after their primary and revision repair or reconstruction. Both revision UCL repair and reconstruction can return pitchers to preinjury performance levels. Pitchers and teams should be properly counseled on realistic RTP times and postsurgery performance when discussing revision UCL surgeries.

Concomitant internal joint stabilizer augmentation with isometric lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair for unstable elbow dislocations: a surgical technique

Complex unstable elbow fracture dislocations can be a challenging pathology to treat for orthopedic surgeons. Historical treatment methods of persistent elbow instability after bony and ligamentous pathology have been addressed include prolonged immobilization, trans-articular pinning, and static or hinged external fixators. However, they can be associated with significant complications and unacceptable rates of unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. As a result, a movable internal fixator known as an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) was developed to help mitigate these complications. The IJS, when utilized, often is inserted at the origin of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). The rotating humeral pin of the IJS must be placed in the elbow’s center axis of rotation at the distal humerus to function properly. The competition for the same footprint makes concomitant anatomic repair of the LUCL challenging. This paper seeks to describe a surgical technique that allows for isometric humeral pin placement of the IJS without sacrificing the ability to restore the LUCL to its anatomic footprint by combining the LUCL suture anchor and IJS humeral pin sites.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Treated With and Without Augmentation: A Network Meta-analysis of Controlled Laboratory Studies

Background: Treatment of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears with suture tape augmentation has gained interest given preliminary reports of favorable biomechanical characteristics. No study to date has quantitatively assessed the biomechanical effects of multiple augmentation techniques relative to the native UCL. Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled laboratory studies to assess and comparatively rank biomechanical effects of UCL repair or reconstruction with or without augmentation. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in January 2023. A frequentist network meta-analytic approach was used to perform mixed-treatment comparisons of UCL repair and reconstruction techniques with and without augmentation, with the native UCL as the reference condition. Pooled treatment estimates were quantified under the random-effects assumption. Competing treatments were ranked in the network meta-analysis by using point estimates and standard errors to calculate P scores (greater P score indicates superiority of treatment for given outcome). Results: Ten studies involving 206 elbow specimens in which a distal UCL tear was simulated were included. UCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation (AugRecon) restored load to failure to a statistically noninferior magnitude (mean difference [MD], –1.99 N·m; 95% CI, –10.2 to 6.2 N·m; P = .63) compared with the native UCL. UCL reconstruction (Recon) (MD, –12.7 N·m; P < .001) and UCL repair with suture tape augmentation (AugRepair) (MD, –14.8 N·m; P < .001) were both statistically inferior to the native UCL. The AugRecon condition conferred greater load to failure compared with Recon (P < .001) and AugRepair (P = .002) conditions. AugRecon conferred greater torsional stiffness relative to all other conditions and was not statistically different from the native UCL (MD, 0.32 N·m/deg; 95% CI, –0.30 to 0.95 N·m/deg; P = .31). Medial ulnohumeral gapping was not statistically different for the AugRepair (MD, 0.30 mm; 95% CI, –1.22 to 1.82 mm; P = .70), AugRecon (MD, 0.57 mm; 95% CI, –0.70 to 1.84 mm; P = .38), or Recon (MD, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, –0.02 to 2.05 mm; P = .055) conditions compared with the native UCL. P-score analysis indicated that AugRecon was the most effective treatment for increasing ultimate load to failure and torsional stiffness, whereas AugRepair was the most effective for minimizing medial gapping. Conclusion: AugRecon restored load to failure and torsional stiffness most similar to the parameters of the native UCL, whereas Recon and AugRepair did not restore the same advantageous properties at time zero. Medial ulnohumeral gapping during a valgus load was minimized by all 3 treatments. Based on network interactions, AugRecon was the superior treatment approach for restoring important biomechanical features of the UCL at time zero that are jeopardized during a complete distal tear.

Clinical and Functional Results of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair for Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Elbow.

Background Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow arises from damage to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). While various methods exist for reconstructing or repairing the LUCL's attachment to the humerus, the most effective approach remains debatable. This study aims to assess the outcomes of directly repairing the LUCL when the injury occurs at the humeral attachment. Methodology This retrospective study, conducted at the Royal Berkshire Foundation Trust NHS hospital in Reading, UK, assessed outcomes through a review of 15 patients who underwent direct repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament between 2017 and 2022, evaluating a range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the Nestor grading system. Results This study included nine males and six females, with an average age of 38.8 years. Most LUCL injuries arose from elbow dislocation (46.7%). The average follow-up period for patients was 26 months. At the final assessment, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score reached 99. According to the Nestor grading system, 12 patients achieved excellent results, and three had good outcomes. On average, there was an 11.3° loss of final extension and 5° of final flexion, yet achieving a comparable pronation-supination arch to the contralateral side. Conclusion Direct repair of the LUCL for elbow posterolateral rotary instability yielded excellent outcomes, obviating ligament reconstruction. Recognized as minimally invasive, it accelerates recovery, minimizes trauma, and offers a cost-effective procedure for managing instability.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation: Can You Overtighten?

Background: There has been a renewed interest and, recently, wider implementation of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair in throwing athletes because of improvement in ligament repair technology and corresponding outcome data. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical parameters and failure mode between 2 brace-tightening techniques for UCL repair. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eleven matched pairs of cadaveric arms were procured. One limb from each pair underwent UCL repair with suture tape augmentation with either (1) attempted restoration of physiologic ligament tension or (2) maximal tension. Each specimen was subjected to 10 cycles of subfailure valgus torque at 90º of flexion in the intact state after UCL avulsion and then after UCL repair. Specimens were then torqued to failure. Articular contact mechanics, linear gap distance, angular displacement, failure torque, failure stiffness, and suture tape pull-through length were recorded. Two-way analysis of variance and paired t tests were used to test for statistical differences. Results: There was a significant effect (P = .01) of tightening on joint contact area. There was a significant decrease in gap distance (P = .03) and angular displacement (P = .004) from the torn condition to the repaired condition for the maximum tension group, without a significant difference in gap distance from the intact condition. Failure torque and stiffness were not significantly different between groups, although there was a significant difference (P = .001) in the overall suture tape pull-through length. Conclusion: Although there are potential physiologic changes at time zero—including significant decreases in contact area, normalized gap distance, and normalized angular displacement with maximal tension repair—examination of failure biomechanics suggests that these effects may be mitigated over time within the construct by suture tape pull-through at the tape-anchor interface. Neither method of UCL repair with suture tape augmentation resulted in overconstraint of the elbow joint compared with the native ligament biomechanics. Clinical Relevance: As more long-term outcome data from UCL repair with suture tape augmentation emerge, there will be wider implementation with various techniques to tension the suture tape. Examining the potential biomechanical sequelae of the UCL repair construct applied under maximal tension will help further refine recommendations for surgeons who utilize this technique for UCL repair.

Low Rates of Postoperative Complications and Revision Surgery After Primary Medial Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair

To evaluate the incidence of early postoperative complications and revision surgery in patients who underwent primary medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair with minimum of 2-year follow-up. A retrospective review of a national insurance database was conducted to identify patients with MUCL injuries who underwent primary MUCL repair between 2015 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients >40 years of age and those who had concomitant elbow fractures or dislocations, lateral UCL injures, medial epicondylitis, elbow arthritis, or a history of previous elbow injury/surgery were excluded. The number of patients who underwent a concomitant ulnar nerve procedure (transposition or decompression) during the primary MUCL repair was recorded. Complications within 90 days of surgery and the incidence and timing of subsequent ipsilateral ulnar nerve surgery or revision MUCL surgery were assessed. A total of 313 patients (63.6% male) were included. The mean age was 20.3 ± 6.9 years, and mean follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.3 years. Concomitant ulnar nerve transposition or decompression was performed in 34.2% (N=107). The early postoperative complication rate was 7.3% (N= 23). The most common complication was ulnar neuropathy (5.8%, N= 18). Wound complications, elbow stiffness, and medial epicondyle fractures were much less common (N= 5). Sixteen of 18 (88.9%) patients with postoperative ulnar neuropathy underwent transposition or decompression at the time of primary repair. Of these 18 patients, 5 (27.8%) underwent a subsequent ulnar nerve surgery (1 primary and 4 secondary), with the majority occurring within 6 months. The incidence of revision MUCL surgery was low (1.0%, N=3), with all 3 patients undergoing MUCL reconstruction. There was a low incidence of early postoperative complications (7.3%) and 2-year revision MUCL surgery (1.0%) in young patients who underwent primary MUCL repair with no additional ligamentous, fracture, and dislocation-related diagnoses. All 3 (1.0%) MUCL revisions underwent reconstruction. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Using Linked Knotless Suture Anchors

This article presents an adaptation of the internal brace ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair technique using knotless suture anchors, which shows promise for improved postsurgical functionality and a shortened recovery period in patients with UCL injuries. Traditional methods of UCL reconstruction often require a lengthy 12- to 18-month recovery period, presenting a significant challenge for athletes keen to return to their sport. The modified technique uses smaller sutures and drill holes, thereby eliminating the need for larger anchors and simplifying the surgical process. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive exploration of the rehabilitation protocol involved after surgery, which includes various phases of physical therapy and use of the “thrower’s ten” program to improve shoulder and elbow stability, strength, and mobility. This technique paves the way for a promising alternative to traditional UCL reconstruction or repair methods, with the potential to significantly enhance clinical outcomes, improve recovery times, and positively impact athletes’ lives.

Tommy John Ligament Repair with Ulnar Collateral Ligament Internal Brace

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries commonly occur in overhead athletes as a result of excess valgus stress on the elbow and can be functionally debilitating, requiring surgical intervention. Since the advent of the first initial UCL reconstruction technique pioneered by Dr. Frank Jobe performed on professional baseball player Tommy John, UCL, or Tommy John Ligament reconstruction has successfully returned athletes to sport following injury and shown enhanced clinical outcomes with minimal complication rates. Tommy John surgery continues to evolve with the development of various techniques over recent years. This technical note describes a UCL repair with an internal brace using knotless suture anchors and aims to contribute to the current literature a technique that is efficacious and reproducible and offers satisfactory stability, functionality, and return to play.

MRI spectrum of injuries to the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint ulnar collateral ligament with a proposed expanded classification of injuries in American football players.

Injuries to the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint are of both historic and modern interest for athletes and non-athletes alike. The thumb metacarpophalangeal joint requires stability in both flexion and extension utilizing a combination of static and dynamic stabilizers. This article reviews the magnetic resonance imaging categorization of thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries and proposes two additional injury patterns seen in high-level and professional athletes who play American football. In addition to the direct magnetic resonance imaging findings in collateral ligament tears, secondary findings of rotation and subluxation can be seen at the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint due to the altered physiologic forces on the joint. Internal brace augmentation via suture tape of a traditional ulnar collateral ligament repair is a novel surgical technique that provides protection during initial healing and the ensuing remodeling phase following repair or reconstruction, resulting in a faster return to play.

Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Repair Using Suture Augmentation, Anchors, and Bone Tunnels

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with suture augmentation has been increasingly used to treat UCL pathology in overhead athletes. For the appropriately indicated patient, UCL repair with suture augmentation without reconstruction has promising results. Advantages of repair with suture augmentation include earlier return to sport, low complication rate, and decreased operative time since there is no need for graft harvest. Previously reported techniques use suture anchors with high-tensile and collagen-coated nonabsorbable sutures. This article provides an alternative augmentation method using a combination of anchors and bone tunnels to obtain an isometric repair.

Paper 21: Functional Outcomes of Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair with Internal Bracing in Athletes

Objectives: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary restraint to valgus stress in the elbow. Injury to this ligament can occur in the setting of acute trauma as well as chronic overuse as seen in baseball players and other overhead athletes. Injury to the UCL continues to be a major source of morbidity in overhead-throwing athletes, with the incidence of UCL tears increasing dramatically over the past 15 years. UCL reconstruction using palmaris longus or hamstring autograft (also known as Tommy John surgery) has been considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of symptomatic UCL injuries in overhead athletes for decades. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in UCL repair. In 2016, Dugas et al described the novel use of a collagen-dipped internal brace to augment UCL repair with encouraging biomechanical results from a cadaveric study. To date, only two studies have reported outcomes for this novel approach to UCL repair with internal brace (IB) augmentation, both with encouraging results. It is thought that the main advantages of UCL repair with IB augmentation compared to UCL reconstruction are comparable return to sport rates with a more rapid postoperative recovery, as well as restoration of normal anatomy that eliminates the need for an autograft and the associated complications of graft harvesting. Given the paucity of data examining this new surgical approach, this study seeks to add clinical outcome data for UCL repair to the scientific literature. The goal of this project is to evaluate functional outcomes following primary ulnar collateral ligament repair using internal brace augmentation and to describe new advancements in the surgical technique for this procedure. Methods: Approval was obtained from the Columbia University Irving Medical Center Institutional Review Board. A retrospective review of the electronic medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent medial UCL repair with internal brace augmentation between 2016 and 2022 was performed. All procedures were performed at a single tertiary institution and all patients were under the direct medical care of the senior author. Only patients with a focal UCL injury, such as a distal or proximal avulsion tear, were selected for UCL repair with internal brace augmentation. Evidence of chronic attritional disease, including calcification on MRI, or extensive ligamentous injury were contraindications to UCL repair. Additionally, only patients undergoing primary UCL repair with internal brace augmentation were included; those with prior UCL reconstructions or repairs were excluded as were patients with insufficient clinical follow-up data. Included in the chart review were patient demographics, level of sport, injury characteristics, preoperative imaging findings, operative data, and postoperative clinical outcomes including complications and reoperations. Patient reported outcomes were collected from the Pitch Registry, a national database maintained by Major League Baseball (MLB). Primary outcomes for this study include the ability to return to play (RTP) at the same previous level or higher, the time to return to competition, complications, and reoperations. Results: A total of 56 patients were included in this study (mean age at surgery was 19.5 ± 4.5 years; 55 men and 1 woman). The majority were baseball players (n=52) of which 43 were pitchers, while the remaining athletes played football, wrestled, or competed in Jujitsu. Twenty-eight were high school athletes, 23 played at the collegiate level, 4 played recreationally, and 1 played professionally. Symptoms of UCL injury preceded surgery by an average of 7.5 ± 15.0 months. The UCL was partially torn in 39 patients and fully torn in the remaining 17 patients, and it was torn proximally in 18, distally in 37, and mid-substance in 1 patient. The mean preoperative Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score was 61.5 ± 15.3, the mean preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 71.6 ± 14.9, and the mean preoperative Youth Throwing Score (YTS) was 40 ± 14. A concomitant arthroscopic osteophyte debridement and synovectomy was performed in 10 cases and a concomitant ulnar nerve transposition was performed in 4 cases. There were no intra-operative complications. The mean length of follow-up was 12.1 ± 7.1 months. Of the total cohort, 51 (91.0%) patients were able to return to play at an average of 7.8 ± 2.4 months. There were 4 reoperations (7.1%) including a single revision UCL reconstruction, 2 ulnar nerve transpositions, and 1 arthroscopic osteophyte debridement. Conclusions: Primary UCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a viable alternative to UCL reconstruction as supported by a rapid return to play and a low complication rate. There remains a paucity of data examining this encouraging and novel surgical approach. Additional data and analysis examining functional outcomes and optimal patient selection will be critical to address the rising epidemic of UCL injuries in young athletes.

Poster 205: Performance and Return to Sport Following Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair with Internal Brace Augmentation in Professional Baseball Players

Objectives: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) has been the gold standard treatment for symptomatic UCL injuries in throwing athletes. Recently, a novel technique of UCL repair with suture augmentation has been described and shown promising biomechanical as well as clinical results in a few small series of nonprofessional athletes. An added advantage of this technique over UCLR is that it affords the potential ability to return to competitive throwing with an accelerated timeline of 6-7 months as opposed to 12-18 months. No prior work has described the outcomes of this technique in professional athletes. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and rate of return to prior level of sport as well as athletic performance of professional baseball players following UCL repair with Internal Brace augmentation. Methods: This study included all professional Major League Baseball (MLB) and Minor League Baseball (MiLB) players who underwent primary UCL repair with Internal Brace from January 2016 to June 2021. Demographic and performance data were recorded for each player. Performance metrics were then compared from one year preinjury against one year postoperative metrics. The return to play date was recorded. Univariate statistical analysis was performed to compare preinjury to postoperative performance (p&lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant). Results: Fifteen players met inclusion criteria (8 MLB and 7 MiLB). Mean age was 28.2 +/- 4.06 years at time of surgery. There were 10 pitchers and 5 position players. All injuries were to the dominant extremity. No players underwent revision surgery during the study period. 93.3% (14/15) of players returned to sport and eventually prior level of competition. Average time to return to sport was 11.5 +/- 4.27 months and average time to prior level of competition was 12.1 +/- 4.61 months. When comparing competitive performance of players that returned successfully, one year preinjury to one year postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference observed in performance [Table 1]. Conclusions: This study demonstrates promising early results of UCL repair with Internal Brace augmentation in professional baseball players. 93.3% of players were able to return to sport in under 12 months. All players, pitcher and position, that returned to sport were able to return to their prior level of play. No statistically significant drop in performance was observed in players that were able to return to play. Further clinical evaluation of UCL repair with Internal Brace augmentation and direct comparison of this procedure with UCL reconstruction is warranted. [Table: see text]

Factors Important to Patient Decision-Making After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury in Competitive High School and Collegiate Baseball Players.

Patients are faced with several treatment decisions after an ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury: nonoperative versus operative treatment, repair versus reconstruction, and immediate versus delayed surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors important to patients when deciding which treatment to pursue after a UCL injury. We hypothesized that (1) length of time away from sports and seasonal timing would be important to patients and (2) treatment decision-making would be heavily influenced by how many and which seasons of their baseball career would be missed. Cross-sectional study. High school and collegiate baseball players with UCL tears treated at an academic institution were surveyed retrospectively on their sports participation at the time of injury and their UCL injury treatment decisions. Respondents rated the influence of various factors on a 5-point Likert scale, and they selected the top 3 factors and the single most important factor influencing their treatment decisions. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between player characteristics and factors important to their treatment decision. A total of 83 athletes completed the survey; 40 were in high school and 43 were in college at the time of injury; 7 were treated nonoperatively and 76 underwent surgery (66 immediately and 10 in a delayed fashion), 10 with UCL repair and 66 with UCL reconstruction. The ability to play competitive baseball in the long term was very important or extremely important to 90% of players, while the ability to play in the short term was very important or extremely important to 17%. Length of recovery and seasonal timing were also important factors for 53% and 54% of players, respectively, and almost all (90%) highly valued advice from a surgeon. Possible failure of nonoperative treatment leading to increased time away and the possible loss of 2 consecutive baseball seasons heavily influenced decision-making in 41% of respondents. Survey respondents were driven by the desire to play baseball in the long term. Treatment decisions were influenced by the length of recovery and by the seasonal timing of their injury, both of which affect how many and which seasons of baseball a player may miss. Patients found advice from their surgeon to be extremely important to decision-making.

Technical trick: buttress plate fixation of comminuted capitellum fractures with combined suture repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament

Technical trick: buttress plate fixation of comminuted capitellum fractures with combined suture repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament

Poster 206: What are the Indications for Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Baseball Players? An MRI Case-based Study

Objectives: Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) tears are common in baseball players. When non-operative management fails; reconstruction or repair may be necessary to restore physical function. There is no clear consensus regarding the indications for surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tear characteristics, or the indications for selecting repair over reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to define the indications for UCL surgery based on MRI and to elucidate indications for UCL repair vs reconstruction. Methods: Twenty-six orthopaedic surgeons who treat baseball players were surveyed. Forty-five MRIs were reviewed: 15 without UCL tears, 15 with intra-operatively confirmed partial-thickness tears, and 15 with full-thickness tears. Factors investigated included ligament characteristics (peri-ligamentous or osseous edema, ligament hypertrophy, calcification, partial or full-thickness tearing) and location (proximal, mid-substance, or distal). Surgeons were given a clinical scenario and asked whether 1) surgery was indicated and 2) whether repair or reconstruction was recommended. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) helped identify significant predictors for both queries. Results: The odds of recommending surgical treatment compared to non-operative treatment were 2.4x more likely for a proximal partial-thickness tear, 3.2x for distal partial-thickness tear, 5.1x for distal full- thickness tear, and 7.0x for proximal full-thickness tear (p&lt;0.001). Significant indications for repair included distal partial (OR=1.6, 95%CI 1.0, 2.1, p&lt;0.001) and full-thickness tears (OR=1.7, 95%CI 1.1, 2.3, p&lt;0.001). Repair was 3x less likely recommended for mid-substance full-thickness tears (OR=3.0, 95%CI - 5.0, -1.0, p=0.004). Ultrasound stress testing was requested in 78% of partial tears. Conclusions: Among surgeons surveyed, the highest odds for recommending operative treatment were proximal full-thickness tears, then distal full-thickness, distal partial-thickness, and proximal partial- thickness tears. Repair was most appropriate for partial and full-thickness distal tears, but relatively contraindicated for complete mid-substance UCL tears. Ultrasound stress testing was frequently requested for partial tears. Given the lack of consensus among surgeons, future prospective registries are necessary to determine whether these factors associate with clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Function After Surgical Repair of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Thumb

The purpose of this study was to report prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes of patients who underwent open thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair and to find risk factors associated with poor patient-reported outcomes. Patients undergoing open surgical repair for a complete thumb UCL rupture were included between December 2011 and February 2021. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) total scores at baseline were compared to MHQ total scores at three and 12 months after surgery. Associations between the 12-month MHQ total score and several variables (i.e., sex, injury to surgery time, K-wire immobilization) were analyzed. Seventy-six patients were included. From baseline to three and 12 months after surgery, patients improved significantly with a mean MHQ total score of 65 (standard deviation [SD] 15) to 78 (SD 14) and 87 (SD 12), respectively. We did not find any differences in outcomes between patients who underwent surgery in the acute (<3 weeks) setting compared to a delayed setting (<6 months). We found that patient-reported outcomes improve significantly at three and 12 months after open surgical repair of the thumb UCL compared to baseline. We did not find an association between injury to surgery time and lower MHQ total scores. This suggests that acute repair for full-thickness UCL tears might not always be necessary. Therapeutic II.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Internal Bracing Repair Technique for High-Grade Partial Proximal Tears in the Throwing Athlete

The use of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with concomitant internal bracing for throwing athletes is a viable treatment option, but must take into account tear location, ligament quality, the expected length of the athlete's career, desire to advance to the next level of competition, and age. There has been increased interest in repair of UCL injuries in overhead athletes due to advancements in surgical technique, as well as improved technologies of anchor and suture material. In addition, return to sport can be accelerated compared to reconstruction. In this Technical Note, we demonstrate an ulnar collateral ligament repair technique, with internal bracing augmentation for high-grade partial proximal tears in the throwing athlete that is reliable, strong, and easily reproducible.